Appendix D Aesthetic Resources

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix D Aesthetic Resources APPENDIX D AESTHETIC RESOURCES AESTHETIC RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page D.1 Caliente Rail Alignment .............................................................................................................. D-2 D.2 Mina Rail Alignment ................................................................................................................. D-46 D.3 References.................................................................................................................................. D-71 LIST OF TABLES Table Page D-1 BLM visual resource management classes and objectives. ......................................................... D-2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page D-1 Visual resource management classifications and key observation points along the Caliente rail alignment ................................................................................................................. D-3 D-2 View northeast from key observation point 1 at U.S. Highway 93 in Dry Lake Valley toward the Burnt Springs and Chief Ranges................................................................................ D-4 D-3 View north from key observation point 1 on U.S. Highway 93 in Dry Lake Valley. Highland Range on right .............................................................................................................. D-4 D-4 View north from key observation point 2 on U.S. Highway 93 toward location of Staging Yard Caliente-Indian Cove option ............................................................................................... D-5 D-5 Simulation of Staging Yard Caliente-Indian Cove option in view north from key observation point 2....................................................................................................................... D-5 D-6 Simulation of train approaching Staging Yard Caliente-Indian Cove option in view north from key observation point 2 ....................................................................................................... D-6 D-7 View north-northwest from key observation point 3 on U.S. Highway 93 .................................D-6 D-8 View north-northeast from key observation point 4 on U.S. Highway 93 .................................. D-7 D-9 Simulation of rock conveyor and construction trains on the Caliente alternative segment (closest to viewer) and quarry siding in view north-northeast from key observation point 4 ......D-7 D-10 View north-northeast from key observation point 5 on U.S. Highway 93 over location of Staging Yard Caliente-Upland option..........................................................................................D-8 D-11 Simulation of Staging Yard Caliente-Upland option in view north-northeast from key observation point 5....................................................................................................................... D-8 D-12 View north-northeast from key observation point 6 on U.S. Highway 93 at location where rail line would cross highway ........................................................................................... D-9 D-13 Simulation of U.S. Highway 93 crossing over rail line in view north-northeast from key observation point 6....................................................................................................................... D-9 D-14 Simulation of train on rail line at U.S. Highway 93 crossing over rail line in view north-northeast from key observation point 6 ............................................................................D-10 D-15 View west from key observation point 7 on U.S. Highway 93 just north of rail line crossing, toward Highland Range and Bennett Pass .................................................................. D-10 DOE/EIS-0369 D-iii AESTHETIC RESOURCES LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Figure Page D-16 Simulation of track in view west from key observation point 7 ................................................D-11 D-17 Simulation of train close to U.S. Highway 93 in view west from key observation point 7....... D-11 D-18 View south from key observation point 8 along U.S. Highway 93 at intersection with State Route 319, toward Big Hogback....................................................................................... D-12 D-19 View north from key observation point 8 along U.S. Highway 93 at intersection with State Route 319.................................................................................................................. D-12 D-20 View south from key observation point 9 at Miller Point in Cathedral Gorge Park toward rail alignment location ............................................................................................................... D-13 D-21 Panorama from northwest to northeast from key observation point 10 on State Route 318, toward location of rail line crossing........................................................................................... D-13 D-22 Simulation of crossing structure and train on rail line in view northwest to northeast from key observation point 10............................................................................................................ D-13 D-23 View west toward Timber Mountain and northern Seaman Range from key observation point 11 off county road west of State Route 318 north of rail line crossing ............................D-14 D-24 Simulation of track in view west from key observation point 11 ..............................................D-14 D-25 Simulation of track and train in view west from key observation point 11 ............................... D-15 D-26 View east-northeast from key observation point 12 on Timber Mountain Pass Road toward location of rail line crossing........................................................................................... D-15 D-27 Simulation of track and signals at rail line crossing of Timber Mountain Pass Road in view east-northeast from key observation point 12 ...............................................................D-16 D-28 Simulation of train at rail line crossing of Timber Mountain Pass Road in view east-northeast from key observation point 12 ............................................................................D-16 D-29 View northeast from key observation point 13 on a county road in south Garden Valley. ....... D-17 D-30 Simulation from key observation point 13 of track on Garden Valley alternative segment 2 in foreground, Garden Valley alternative segments 1 and 3 in background, coming from east entry to valley ............................................................................................... D-17 D-31 Simulation of train on Garden Valley alternative segment 2 in view northeast from key observation point 13................................................................................................................... D-18 D-32 View south from key observation point 14 on county road in middle of Garden Valley toward south end of the Golden Gate Range ............................................................................. D-18 D-33 Simulation from key observation point 14 of track on nearby Garden Valley alternative segment 1, distant Garden Valley alternative segment 2, and more distant Garden Valley alternative segment 8 ................................................................................................................. D-19 D-34 Simulation of train on Garden Valley alternative segment 1 in view south from key observation point 14................................................................................................................... D-19 D-35 View northwest toward Quinn Canyon Range from key observation point 15 on county road south of Garden Valley ...................................................................................................... D-20 D-36 Simulation of track on Garden Valley alternative segment 1 (background) and Garden Valley alternative segment 2 in view northwest from key observation point 15....................... D-20 D-37 Simulation of trains on Garden Valley alternative segment 2 (closest to viewer) and Garden Valley alternative segment 1 in view northwest from key observation point 15 .......... D-21 DOE/EIS-0369 D-iv AESTHETIC RESOURCES LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Figure Page D-38 View northwest toward the Quinn Canyon Range from key observation point 16 on top of a City mound.............................................................................................................................. D-21 D-39 Simulation of track on Garden Valley alternative segment 1 (midground) and Garden Valley alternative segment 3 (background) in view northwest from key observation point 16 ...................................................................................................................................... D-22 D-40 Simulation of trains on Garden Valley alternative segment 1 and Garden Valley alternative segment 3 in view northwest from key observation point 16 ..................................D-22 D-41 View west-southwest from key observation point 16 on top of a City mound over Garden Valley between the Worthington and Quinn Canyon Ranges ...................................................D-23 D-42 Simulation of track on Garden Valley alternative segment 1 across midground of view, Garden Valley alternative segment 3 more distant, in view west-southwest from key observation point 16..................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Crd Title P1.Ai
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This chapter describes the potential environmental impacts of constructing and operating a railroad along the Caliente rail alignment or the Mina rail alignment. An impact would be any change, positive or negative, from the existing (baseline) conditions described in Chapter 3 for each environmental resource area. The No-Action Alternative represents a continuation of baseline conditions. Glossary terms are shown in bold italics. DOE/EIS-0369D 4-1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 4.1 Introduction This chapter begins with a description of impacts associated with the No-Action Alternative (Section 4.1.1). As Proposed Action: To determine a described in Section 2.3, under the No-Action Alternative, rail alignment within a rail corridor in which to construct and operate a the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) railroad to transport spent nuclear would not select a rail alignment or build a railroad within fuel, high-level radioactive waste, the Caliente rail corridor or the Mina rail corridor and and other materials from an existing would relinquish public lands withdrawn or segregated from railroad in Nevada to a repository at surface and mineral entry. The description of impacts Yucca Mountain, Nye County, associated with the No-Action Alternative applies to both Nevada. The Proposed Action rail corridors and all rail line alternative segments and includes the construction of railroad common segments. Section 4.1.2 introduces descriptions of construction and operations support impacts associated with the Proposed Action. facilities. This Rail Alignment EIS analyzes two Sections 4.2 and 4.3 describe potential impacts associated alternatives that would implement the with construction and operation of the proposed railroad Proposed Action: the Caliente rail along the Caliente rail alignment and the Mina rail alignment alignment and the Mina rail under the Proposed Action, including a Shared-Use Option.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Lake Valley North SEZ Analysis
    1 11.4 DRY LAKE VALLEY NORTH 2 3 4 11.4.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 11.4.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is located in Lincoln County in southeastern 10 Nevada (Figure 11.4.1.1-1). The SEZ has a total area of 76,874 acres (311 km2). In 2008, the 11 county population was 4,643, while adjacent Clark County to the south had a population 12 of 1,879,093. The closest population centers to the SEZ are Pioche, located about 15 mi (24 km) 13 to the east, and Caliente, located about 15 mi (24 km) to the southeast; both communities have 14 populations of about 1,000. The smaller communities of Caselton and Prince are located about 15 13 mi (21 km) to the east of the SEZ. Las Vegas is located about 110 mi (180 km) to the south. 16 17 The nearest major road to the Dry Lake Valley North SEZ is State Route 318, which is 18 about 7 mi (11 km) to the west of the SEZ, while U.S. 93 is about 8 mi (13 km) to the south. 19 Access to the interior of the SEZ is by dirt roads. The nearest railroad access is approximately 20 25 mi (40 km) away, while nearby airports include Lincoln County Airport in Panaca and Alamo 21 Landing Field in Alamo, which are located about 13 mi (21 km) south–southeast of and 35 mi 22 (56 km) southwest of the SEZ, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada
    Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1988-B I 1 r^Hr-~"r-^S »:-«>'°-;>-.'; '£ '. -"* °-"^^io-'oO;ol!i-..e>L ^? :^~ty-":- o\: s--b>^.'d- .? " ? o..bTvo-r» ?:.-!:.»:-. "o'.-o'-o .- *^-o?.°:.--o : : ° o£\*>: ^-°:* '.« - "o-o- .-o - ^-.o.*'. ^» ' - 1 .". '. O- ' "" "- "* -" no: ^--'*^-o.yvo:»-c)^ - *>- : p.-by :o.;--p-/.-'o."-',c>-( 0 = ?.o'VO -V "±« -* «?'.<?o-oi ^ .. «- .*».-:»: -* ^^»-^ Chapter B Stratigraphy and Structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada By DONLON O. HURTUBISE and EDWARD A. DU BRAY A multidisciplinary approach to research studies of sedimentary rocks and their constituents and the evolution of sedimentary basins, both ancient and modern U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1988 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS EASTERN GREAT BASIN HARRY E. COOK AND CHRISTOPHER J. POTTER, Project Coordinators U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hurtubise, D.O. Stratigraphy and structure of the Seaman Range and Fox Mountain, Lincoln and Nye Counties, Nevada / by Donlon O. Hurtubise and Edward A. du Bray, p. cm. (Evolution of sedimentary basins Eastern Great Basin ; ch. B) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1988-B) Includes bibliographical references.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3-72. Groundwater Usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, P
    AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Figure 3-72. Groundwater usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, p. 7.) There are a number of published estimates of perennial yield for many of the hydrographic areas in Nevada, and those estimates often differ by large amounts. The perennial-yield values listed in Table 3-35 predominantly come from a single source, the Nevada Division of Water Planning (DIRS 103406-Nevada Division of Water Planning 1992, for Hydrographic Regions 10, 13, and 14); therefore, the table does not show a range of values for each hydrographic area. In the Yucca Mountain area, the Nevada Division of Water Planning identifies a combined perennial yield for hydrographic areas 225 through 230. DOE obtained perennial yields from Data Assessment & Water Rights/Resource Analysis of: Hydrographic Region #14 Death Valley Basin (DIRS 147766-Thiel 1999, pp. 6 to 12) to provide estimates for hydrographic areas the Caliente rail alignment would cross: 227A, 228, and 229. That 1999 document presents perennial-yield estimates from several sources. Table 3-35 lists the lowest (that is, the most conservative) values cited in that document, which is consistent with the approach DOE used in the Yucca Mountain FEIS (DIRS 155970-DOE 2002, p. 3-136). DOE/EIS-0369 3-173 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Table 3-35 also summarizes existing annual committed groundwater resources for each hydrographic area along the Caliente rail alignment. However, all committed groundwater resources within a hydrographic area might not be in use at the same time. Table 3-35 also includes information on pending annual duties within each of these hydrographic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Devonian Stratigraphy of the Timpahute Range, Nevada
    STRUCTURE AND DEVONIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF THE TIMPAHUTE RANGE, NEVADA Volume I by Alan K. Chamberlain © Copyright, 1999 A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date____________ Signed:__________________________ Alan K. Chamberlain Approved:__________________________ Dr. John E. Warme Professor and Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date____________ ____________________________________ Dr. Roger Slatt, Professor and Head, Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Sequences of Devonian rocks are advantageously exposed along a unique 40- mile-long east-west traverse in the greater Timpahute Range, southeastern Nevada. Study of these rocks casts light upon Devonian paleogeography, the Devonian Antler orogeny, an Upper Devonian cosmolite impact basin, this part of the Cretaceous Sevier fold-and- thrust belt, and the effects of Cenozoic extension. The greater Timpahute Range lies within the Timpahute Range 30' X 60' quadrangle and includes the region from Tempiute Mountain on the west to the Pahroc Range on the east. Concealed major north-south trending normal faults caused by Cenozoic extension have been proposed to disrupt the Paleozoic rocks of the region. However, a structural interpretation using a new geologic map of the quadrangle requires no major north-south striking normal faults. Furthermore, the greater Timpahute Range is interpreted as a salient of stacked thrust sheets within the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt. The range is bounded on the north and south by thrust tear faults that may be related to basement fractures caused by the cosmolite impact. Evidence for the Late Devonian cosmolite impact includes shocked quartz, iridium anomalies, ejecta spherules, and disturbed shallowing-upward sequences exhibiting intrasequence folding, brecciation, carbonate liquefaction, and graded bedding.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Resource Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Ely District
    Ely Proposed Resource Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement Ely Field Office / Nevada Ely Field Office Appendices November 2007 COOPERATING AGENCIES: Great Basin National Park Lincoln County Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Nye County Nellis Air Force Base White Pine County Nevada Department of Wildlife Duckwater Shoshone Tribe Nevada Division of Minerals Ely Shoshone Tribe Nevada Division of Transportation Moapa Band of Paiutes Nevada State Historic Preservation Office Yomba Shoshone Tribe BLM Mission Statement It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/EL/PL-07/09+1793 DOI No. FES 07-40 Cover Photo: Cottonwood Canyon – Fortification Range Wilderness, Lincoln County, Nevada. Ely BLM photo. May, 2002. LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A - PHASES OF THE WATERSHED ANALYSIS PROCESS AND THE GRAZING ALLOTMENT EVALUATION PROCESS APPENDIX B - RESOURCE ADVISORY COUNCIL STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES APPENDIX C - STATE AND TRANSITION MODELS, LANDFIRE AND FIRE REGIME CONDITION CLASS APPENDIX D - AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN APPENDIX E - SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES APPENDIX F - CONSOLIDATED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Section 1 – Resource Program Best Management Practices Section 2 – Fluid Minerals Lease Notices and Stipulations Section 3 – BLM Wind Energy Development Program Policies and Best Management Practices APPENDIX G - TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES AND PROGRAMMATIC EMERGENCY STABILIZATION AND REHABILITATION PLAN APPENDIX H - LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR POTENTIAL LAND DISPOSAL APPENDIX I - COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ON THE DRAFT RMP/EIS APPENDIX A PHASES OF THE WATERSHED ANALYSIS PROCESS AND THE GRAZING ALLOTMENT EVALUATION PROCESS APPENDIX A APPENDIX A PHASES OF THE WATERSHED ANALYSIS PROCESSES AND THE GRAZING ALLOTMENT EVALUATION PROCESS The watershed analysis process described in the BLM Handbook, H-4180-1 Rangeland Health Standards is being used to analyze 61 watersheds and associated grazing allotments in the planning area.
    [Show full text]
  • Grazing Permit Renewals for the Wilson Creek Allotment DOI-BLM
    BLM U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Preliminary Environmental Assessment Grazing Permit Renewals for the Wilson Creek Allotment DOI-BLM-NV-L020-2016-0001-EA July 2018 PREPARING OFFICE Bristlecone Field Office U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Ely District Office, Nevada Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Identifying Information .............................................................................................................. 2 Title, Environment Assessment Number and type of Project ........................................... 2 Location of Proposed Action ............................................................................................ 2 Name and Location of Preparing Office ........................................................................... 2 Background Information ............................................................................................................ 4 Grazing Permit History .................................................................................................... 4 BLM Interdisciplinary Review and Assessment of Rangeland Health ............................. 5 Standards for Rangeland Health Achievement ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Clover Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada
    Mineral Resources of the Clover Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1729-D t **. i &. i-wj'-sA" ..,. r .»\ '* ~ "'" ^^-J5?#^ Chapter D Mineral Resources of the Clover Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada By BARRY MORING, H. RICHARD BLANK, Jr., and JAMES D. HOFFMAN U.S. Geological Survey EDWARD L McHUGH U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1729 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS: SOUTHEASTERN NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade names and trademarks in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mineral resources of the Clover Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Lincoln County, Nevada. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1729-D) Bibliography: p. 1. Mines and mineral resources Nevada Clover Mountains Wilderness. 2. Clover Mountains Wilderness (Nev.) I. Moring, Barry, C. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1729-D 557.3 s 88-600195 [TN24.N3] [553'.09793'14] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Area The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Pahroc Spring SE Quadrangle, Lincoln County, Nevada by W C Swadley and Peter D. Rowley U.S. Geological Surve
    DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic map of the Pahroc Spring SE Quadrangle, Lincoln County, Nevada by W C Swadley and Peter D. Rowley U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO Open-Pile Report 92-7 This map is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature 1992 Geologic Map of the Pahroc Spring SE Quadrangle, Lincoln County, Nevada UAT/75 V . Pji»cr«f(?J tc \ fcw DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS [Classifications of volcanic and plutonic rocks are those of IUGS (Le Bas and others, 1986, and Streckeisen, 1976, respectively). Where necessary, isotopic ages given here have been recalculated using the IUGS decay constants (Steiger and Jager, 1977). Ages of surfical deposits were not determined by absolute dating techniques; ages are estimates based on field observations of degree of soil development and local surface dissection. The stage of carbonate development reported for soils is a visual estimate that used standards defined by Gile and others (1966). Colors of surficial units are from the Rock-Color Chart (Rock-Color Chart Committee, 1951). Where a veneer of a younger unit masks but does not completely conceal am underlying unit, fractional symbols are used (e.g.,Qae/Qaw)] Qal Alluvium (late Holocene)--Pale-yellowish-brown to grayish-orange sand, gavelly sand, and small amounts of gravel; unconsolidated, moderately well sorted to poorly sorted, massive to poorly bedded. Sand is fine to very coarse near mountain front, generally fine to medium at distal edges of fans. Gavelly sand contains angular to subrounded pebbles and small cobbles of ash-flow tuff, lava flows, limestone, dolomite, and quartzite; large cobbles and sparse boulders as much as 1 m in diameter are locally present, chiefly near bedrock exposures.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ely District Update
    Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ely District Update April 2017 BASIN AND RANGE NATIONAL MONUMENT Resource Management Plan (RMP): Public scoping concluded in July 2016. The final scoping report is available at http://bit.ly/29nU5BT. The BLM is currently completing the analysis of the management situation (AMS) and will be developing alternatives that will be analyzed in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The BLM expects to make a draft RMP/EIS available for public review and comment in late summer 2017. Conservation Easement: The BLM in December 2016 accepted the donation of a 1,316-acre conservation easement on private lands in Garden Valley containing artist Michael Heizer’s earth art “City.” The BLM received the easement from the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA). LACMA received it from the non-profit Triple Aught Foundation, which owns the land on which the sculpture is built. Under the agreement, Triple Aught retains fee title to the land. The BLM has the ability to prevent development incompatible with protection of the artwork and surrounding area. ELY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN The Nevada and Northeastern California Greater Sage-Grouse Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment (ARMPA) in September 2015 amended the Ely District Resource Management Plan (RMP) signed in 2008. Changes to the Ely RMP from the ARMPA, as well as two other amendments, have been incorporated into the RMP. ENERGY Electrical Transmission Development – TransCanyon Cross-Tie Project: The BLM Ely District and West Desert (Utah) District, Fillmore Field Office are coordinating on the TransCanyon, LLC application to construct a 500kV transmission line between the Robinson Summit (500 kV) substation west of Ely and the Mona/Clover (345kV) substation near Mona, Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1480 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1113 (Pub
    § 1113 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1480 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 13, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation § 1113. Authorization of appropriations System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- There are hereby authorized to be appro- priations be available for additional personnel priated to the Department of the Interior with- stated as being required solely for the purpose of out fiscal year limitation such sums as may be managing or administering areas solely because necessary for the purposes of this chapter and they are included within the National Wilder- the agreement with the Government of Canada ness Preservation System. signed January 22, 1964, article 11 of which pro- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined vides that the Governments of the United States A wilderness, in contrast with those areas and Canada shall share equally the costs of de- where man and his own works dominate the veloping and the annual cost of operating and landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where maintaining the Roosevelt Campobello Inter- the earth and its community of life are un- national Park. trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- (Pub. L. 88–363, § 14, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this chapter an CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL WILDERNESS area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its PRESERVATION SYSTEM primeval character and influence, without per- manent improvements or human habitation, Sec. which is protected and managed so as to pre- 1131.
    [Show full text]