Open-File Report 79-760 Open-File Report 79-760
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Figure 3-72. Groundwater Usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, P
AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Figure 3-72. Groundwater usage in Nevada in 2000. (Source: DIRS 175964-Lopes and Evetts 2004, p. 7.) There are a number of published estimates of perennial yield for many of the hydrographic areas in Nevada, and those estimates often differ by large amounts. The perennial-yield values listed in Table 3-35 predominantly come from a single source, the Nevada Division of Water Planning (DIRS 103406-Nevada Division of Water Planning 1992, for Hydrographic Regions 10, 13, and 14); therefore, the table does not show a range of values for each hydrographic area. In the Yucca Mountain area, the Nevada Division of Water Planning identifies a combined perennial yield for hydrographic areas 225 through 230. DOE obtained perennial yields from Data Assessment & Water Rights/Resource Analysis of: Hydrographic Region #14 Death Valley Basin (DIRS 147766-Thiel 1999, pp. 6 to 12) to provide estimates for hydrographic areas the Caliente rail alignment would cross: 227A, 228, and 229. That 1999 document presents perennial-yield estimates from several sources. Table 3-35 lists the lowest (that is, the most conservative) values cited in that document, which is consistent with the approach DOE used in the Yucca Mountain FEIS (DIRS 155970-DOE 2002, p. 3-136). DOE/EIS-0369 3-173 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT – CALIENTE RAIL ALIGNMENT Table 3-35 also summarizes existing annual committed groundwater resources for each hydrographic area along the Caliente rail alignment. However, all committed groundwater resources within a hydrographic area might not be in use at the same time. Table 3-35 also includes information on pending annual duties within each of these hydrographic areas. -
Geologic Map of the Pahroc Spring SE Quadrangle, Lincoln County, Nevada by W C Swadley and Peter D. Rowley U.S. Geological Surve
DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic map of the Pahroc Spring SE Quadrangle, Lincoln County, Nevada by W C Swadley and Peter D. Rowley U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO Open-Pile Report 92-7 This map is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature 1992 Geologic Map of the Pahroc Spring SE Quadrangle, Lincoln County, Nevada UAT/75 V . Pji»cr«f(?J tc \ fcw DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS [Classifications of volcanic and plutonic rocks are those of IUGS (Le Bas and others, 1986, and Streckeisen, 1976, respectively). Where necessary, isotopic ages given here have been recalculated using the IUGS decay constants (Steiger and Jager, 1977). Ages of surfical deposits were not determined by absolute dating techniques; ages are estimates based on field observations of degree of soil development and local surface dissection. The stage of carbonate development reported for soils is a visual estimate that used standards defined by Gile and others (1966). Colors of surficial units are from the Rock-Color Chart (Rock-Color Chart Committee, 1951). Where a veneer of a younger unit masks but does not completely conceal am underlying unit, fractional symbols are used (e.g.,Qae/Qaw)] Qal Alluvium (late Holocene)--Pale-yellowish-brown to grayish-orange sand, gavelly sand, and small amounts of gravel; unconsolidated, moderately well sorted to poorly sorted, massive to poorly bedded. Sand is fine to very coarse near mountain front, generally fine to medium at distal edges of fans. Gavelly sand contains angular to subrounded pebbles and small cobbles of ash-flow tuff, lava flows, limestone, dolomite, and quartzite; large cobbles and sparse boulders as much as 1 m in diameter are locally present, chiefly near bedrock exposures. -
The 36–18 Ma Indian Peak–Caliente Ignimbrite Field and Calderas
The 36–18 Ma Southern Great Basin, USA, Ignimbrite Province and Flareup themed issue The 36–18 Ma Indian Peak–Caliente ignimbrite fi eld and calderas, southeastern Great Basin, USA: Multicyclic super-eruptions Myron G. Best1, Eric H. Christiansen1, Alan L. Deino2, Sherman Gromme3, Garret L. Hart4, and David G. Tingey1 1Department of Geological Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602-4606, USA 2Berkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, California 94709, USA 3420 Chaucer Street, Palo Alto, California 94301, USA 4Pacifi c Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA Dedicated to J. Hoover Mackin, who initiated study of the Indian Peak–Caliente ignimbrite fi eld with his rec- ognition in the 1950s that the “lava fl ows” near Cedar City are actually widespread ignimbrites, including the unusual trachydacitic Isom-type tuffs and the colossal Needles Range monotonous intermediates. ABSTRACT of meters. Outfl ow ignimbrite sequences com- sibly kindred, phenocryst-rich latite- prise as many as several cooling units from andesite ignimbrite with an outfl ow volume The Indian Peak–Caliente caldera complex different sources with an aggregate thickness of 1100 km3 was erupted at 22.56 Ma from a and its surrounding ignimbrite fi eld were locally reaching a kilome ter; sequences are concealed source caldera to the south. a major focus of explosive silicic activity in almost everywhere conformable and lack 2. Trachydacitic Isom-type tuffs. Also rela- the eastern sector of the subduction-related substantial intervening erosional debris and tively uniform but phenocryst poor (<20%) southern Great Basin ignimbrite province angular discordances, thus manifesting a with plagioclase >> clinopyroxene ≈ ortho- during the middle Cenozoic (36–18 Ma) lack of synvolcanic crustal extension. -
1 SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL Systematic
SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL Systematic palaeontology Olenellus gilberti Meek in White, 1874 Synonymy. 1874 Olenellus Gilberti Meek in White: 7-8 1875 Olenus (Olenellus) Gilberti (Meek in White); Gilbert: ?181 [as Olenus gilberti, from Oquirrh Range], 182-183 1877 Olenellus Gilberti Meek in White; White (part): 44-46, pl. 2, figs. 3a-c only [?not pl. 2, figs. d, e = indeterminate thoracic segments] 1879 Olenellus Gilberti Meek in White; Brögger: 45 [mentioned] 1883 Olenellus Gilberti Meek in White; Hague: 256, 257 [mentioned] 1884 Olenellus Gilberti Meek in White; Walcott (part): 2, 29, 34, 38, 268, pl. 21, fig. 14 only [not pp. 36, 37; not pl. 9, fig. 16 = Olenellus nevadensis (Walcott, 1910), following Walcott 1910; not pl. 9, fig. 16a = olenellid sp. indet., note that this specimen was reassigned to Mesonacis fremonti (Walcott, 1910) by Walcott 1910; not pl. 21, fig. 13 = O. nevadensis, following Walcott 1910] [pl. 21, fig. 14 is the same specimen as White 1877, fig. 3c, and was erroneously reassigned to O. clarki (Resser, 1928) by Palmer & Halley 1979] 1886 Olenellus Gilberti Meek in White; Walcott (part): ?34 (Highland Range), ?35 (Highland Range), ?36 (Timpahute Range), ?38 (Silver Peak), ?40 (Kicking Horse Lake, British Columbia), 47, 55, 170-180, pl. 19, figs. 2, 2a, 2b only, pl. 20, fig. 4 only, pl. 21, ?figs. 1, 1a only [not p. 39; not pl. 18, figs. 1, 1a = Olenellus howelli Meek in White, 1874 following Palmer & Halley 1979; not p. 32; not pl. 18, fig. 1b = M. fremonti; not pl. 18, fig. 1c = olenelloid sp. indet., this was reassigned to M. -
Appendix D Aesthetic Resources
APPENDIX D AESTHETIC RESOURCES AESTHETIC RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page D.1 Caliente Rail Alignment .............................................................................................................. D-2 D.2 Mina Rail Alignment ................................................................................................................. D-46 D.3 References.................................................................................................................................. D-71 LIST OF TABLES Table Page D-1 BLM visual resource management classes and objectives. ......................................................... D-2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page D-1 Visual resource management classifications and key observation points along the Caliente rail alignment ................................................................................................................. D-3 D-2 View northeast from key observation point 1 at U.S. Highway 93 in Dry Lake Valley toward the Burnt Springs and Chief Ranges................................................................................ D-4 D-3 View north from key observation point 1 on U.S. Highway 93 in Dry Lake Valley. Highland Range on right .............................................................................................................. D-4 D-4 View north from key observation point 2 on U.S. Highway 93 toward location of Staging Yard Caliente-Indian Cove option ..............................................................................................