Women in Science and Engineering
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Women's History Month 2005 “Women Change America” ~March
Women’s History Month 2005 “Women Change America” ~March 2005~ *********** Wednesday, March 2 nd National Women’s History Month Kickoff Brown Bag Workshop Enjoy an entertaining and informational slide show highlighting women’s Topic: Personal Finances: Tips on organizing, saving and building achievements. Participate in the Women’s History Month Trivia Game personal assets while maintaining a good credit standing afterwards to win a prize. 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm, Room 590 East Building, NJIT. Bring your lunch, 2:30 pm, Campus Center Cafeteria, 1 st Floor, NJIT drinks & snacks will be provided. Sponsored by NJIT Committee on Women’s Issues Ruth Berman and Connie Kurtz, subjects of the film: “Ruthie and Connie: Every Room in the House” Tuesday, March 22 nd 2:30 p.m., Multi-Purpose Room, Robeson Center, Rutgers-Newark Film: Mona Lisa Smile First showing at 10:00 am and continuously until 9:00 pm A Wild Comedy: “Early One Evening @ Rainbow Bar & Grille” Campus Center Lounge, 2 nd floor, NJIT 7:00 pm, Bradley Hall Theater, Rutgers-Newark $5 for Students & Seniors, $7 for general admission ACE-Network Spring Workshop: “Coaching, Take Time for Your Life” Thursday, March 3 rd & Friday, March 4 th Presented by: Charline Russo, Life Coach A Wild Comedy: “Early One Evening @ Rainbow Bar & Grille” 12:00 pm-2:00 pm, Location: School of Architecture Gallery, NJIT. Bring 7:00 pm, Bradley Hall Theater, Rutgers-Newark your lunch, drinks & snacks will be provided $5 for NJIT Students & Seniors, $7 for general admission Wednesday, March 23 rd Saturday, March 5 th Annual Lillian Gilbreth Colloquium : Upward Bound “Women’s History Month Program” Making Time: Lillian Moller Gilbreth, a Life Beyond "Cheaper by Speakers & workshops focused on the role women play in today’s society the Dozen". -
Women in Physics, 2000 Highlights
By Rachel Ivie AIP Publication Number R-430 June, 2000 Katie Stowe Women in Physics, 2000 Highlights • An increasingly large number of girls have some exposure to physics by taking it in high school. By 1997, almost one-half of high school physics students were girls (Figure 1) . About 400,000 girls take high school physics each year. • Women’s participation in physics decreases with each step up the academic ladder. For example, more than two-fifths of high school physics students in 1993 were girls, but women earned less than one-fifth of bachelor’s degrees in physics five years later (Figures 1 and 3) . • Although women now earn more than one half of all bachelor’s degrees in the U.S., physics is not attracting women as quickly as other fields, including life sciences, chemistry, and engineering (Figures 4 and 5) . Compared to other fields, women are sorely underrepresented in physics at both the bachelor’s and PhD levels (Figures 4, 5, 6, 7, and Table 1) . • Twenty U.S. physics departments (excluding women’s colleges) had more than 40% female bachelor’s degree recipients during the five academic years 1994-98. This report lists these departments as well as women’s colleges that grant bachelor’s degrees in physics (Tables 2 and 3) . • The proportion of women teaching physics decreases as academic rank and level of the department increases (Table 4) . However, the percentage of women faculty members at each rank is at least as high as the percentage of women earning PhDs at various points in the past. -
Perceptions About Women in Science and Engineering History
AC 2012-3444: PERCEPTIONS ABOUT WOMEN IN SCIENCE AND EN- GINEERING HISTORY Dr. Heidi Reeder, Boise State University Heidi Reeder is a social scientist whose research interests include gender, communication, and pedagogy. Her articles have been published in top communication and social psychology journals including Sex Roles, Communication Monographs, and The Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. She is also as an online contributor to Psychology Today. She earned a B.S. in Communication from the University of Oregon, an M.A. in Communication from Stanford University, and a Ph.D. in Communication from Arizona State University. In 2007, she was selected as the Carnegie Foundation’s Idaho Professor of the Year. Patricia A. Pyke, Boise State University Patricia A. Pyke is Director of the STEM Station, a university-level science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research and education initiative at Boise State University. She earned a B.S.E. degree in mechanical engineering from Duke University and a master’s degree in journalism from the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Lynn Lubamersky, Boise State University Lynn Lubamersky studied history at the University of California, Berkeley, and at Indiana University, where she received her Ph.D. She is Associate Professor in the History Department at Boise State Un- viersity and teaches courses in women’s studies, the history of the family, and the history of early modern Europe. She has published several articles on noblewomen’s access to political power. She has had several articles published in Germany, Russia, and in North America. Dr. Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University Seung Youn (Yonnie) Chyung is a professor in the Department of Instructional and Performance Tech- nology in the College of Engineering at Boise State University. -
Physics in Your Future Introduces Physics and Careers in Physics to Young People, Their Parents, Teachers and Advisors
TM American Physical Society • Committee on the Status of Women in Physics Chiara La Tessa of Brookhaven National Laboratory is inside the target room of the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory at Brookhaven. She is aligning a detector called EGG counter in the center of a beam – something that’s done before each experiment. Physics helps us understand the world around us, the world inside us, and the world beyond us. Physics is the most basic and fundamental science; it deals with how and why matter and energy act as they do. The laws of physics apply to force and motion, gravity, electricity, magnetism, sound, light and heat. They help us understand the physical world and develop products that people need. Mastering physics is fun and challenging. It involves working with others, as well as alone. You learn how to solve problems, observe things carefully, make measurements and keep accurate records. You can use these valuable skills for the rest of your life. They open doors to many good jobs. Physicists ask questions about the physical world and try to find exact answers. They are creative and persistent. Some do basic research. Their goal is to increase our knowledge of the universe. Others do applied research. They use basic knowledge to solve world problems such as food and energy supply, environmental protection, transportation, communication and defense. Physicists work in industry, educational institutions, government, and medical centers today. Most are active scientists and engineers. They do research and development, administration, and teaching. Others use their physics background in fields like publishing, sales, law, accounting and medicine. -
Physiology, Cybernetics, Humanistic Systems in Ergonomics a Dissertation SUBMITTED to the FACULTY of T
Care of the Machine Self: Physiology, Cybernetics, Humanistic Systems in Ergonomics A dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESTOTA BY: Mark A. Martinez IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIERMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Ronald Walter Greene January 2013 © Mark A. Martinez 2014 i Acknowledgements There are numerous people to whom I am grateful for their support during this arduous process. Thank you to Dr. Kyle Stine, who welcomed me either at The Foxhead or Georges, where there were no shortage of whiskey or ideas. I thank my oldest and dearest friend Juan Linz who, either in person, by phone or by text, sent positive energy my way. To Dr. Matthew Bost who I thank for being my closest “theory-head” confidant in our department, and who pushed me to know more through his own excellence. To my entire committee I thank you for your efforts and feedback. Thank you Dr. Donald Browne for stepping up to my committee and contributing on such short notice—and thank you for letting me meet my future wife in your Mass Communication course. Thank you Dr. Rembert Hueser for giving me access to another body of literature, another community of scholars, another direction for me to take, and ultimately in my opinion, another way to try to become a better person through philosophy. I thank Dr. Ronald Walter Greene for giving me a communication scholar to look up to. Thank you for having patience with slow work and tolerance for strange tangents. Thank you for producing nothing but generosity and productive guidance that showed me you truly have love for thinking anew. -
Selected Highlights of Women's History
Selected Highlights of Women’s History United States & Connecticut 1773 to 2015 The Permanent Commission on the Status of Women omen have made many contributions, large and Wsmall, to the history of our state and our nation. Although their accomplishments are too often left un- recorded, women deserve to take their rightful place in the annals of achievement in politics, science and inven- Our tion, medicine, the armed forces, the arts, athletics, and h philanthropy. 40t While this is by no means a complete history, this book attempts to remedy the obscurity to which too many Year women have been relegated. It presents highlights of Connecticut women’s achievements since 1773, and in- cludes entries from notable moments in women’s history nationally. With this edition, as the PCSW celebrates the 40th anniversary of its founding in 1973, we invite you to explore the many ways women have shaped, and continue to shape, our state. Edited and designed by Christine Palm, Communications Director This project was originally created under the direction of Barbara Potopowitz with assistance from Christa Allard. It was updated on the following dates by PCSW’s interns: January, 2003 by Melissa Griswold, Salem College February, 2004 by Nicole Graf, University of Connecticut February, 2005 by Sarah Hoyle, Trinity College November, 2005 by Elizabeth Silverio, St. Joseph’s College July, 2006 by Allison Bloom, Vassar College August, 2007 by Michelle Hodge, Smith College January, 2013 by Andrea Sanders, University of Connecticut Information contained in this book was culled from many sources, including (but not limited to): The Connecticut Women’s Hall of Fame, the U.S. -
Curriculum Vitae
CURRICULUM VITAE Smadar Naoz September 2021 Contact University of California Los Angeles, Information Department of Physics & Astronomy 30 Portola Plaza, Box 951547 E-mail: [email protected] Los Angeles, CA 90095 WWW: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/∼snaoz/ Research Dynamics of planetary, stellar and black hole systems, which include formation of Hot Jupiters, Interests globular clusters, spiral structure, compact objects etc. Cosmology, structure formation in the early Universe, reionization and 21cm fluctuations. Education Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Ph.D. in Physics, January 2010 Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel M.S. in Physics, Magna Cum Laude, 2004 B.S. in Physics 2002 Positions University of California, Los Angeles Associate professor since July 2019 Howard & Astrid Preston Term Chair in Astrophysics since July 2018 Assistant professor 2014-2019 Harvard Smithsonian CfA, Institute for Theory and Computation Einstein Fellow, September 2012 { June 2014 ITC Fellow, September 2011 { August 2012 Northwestern University, CIERA Gruber Fellow, September 2010 { August 2011 Postdoctoral associate in theoretical astrophysics, January 2010 { August 2010 Scholarships Helen B. Warner Prize, awarded by the American Astronomical Society, 2020 Honors and Scialog fellow, and accepted proposal, Signatures of Life in the Universe, 2020/2021 (conference Awards postponed to 2021 due to COVID-19) Career Commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Award, given by UCLA Academic Senate 2019. For other diversity awards, see xDEI. Hellman Fellows Award, awarded by Hellman Fellows Program, aimed to support the research of promising Assistant Professors who show capacity for great distinction in their research, June 2017 Multiple departmental teaching awards 2015-2019, see xTeaching, for details Sloan Research Fellowships awarded by the Alfred P. -
Women Who Read the Stars Sue Nelson Delights in Dava Sobel’S Account of a Rare Band of Human Computers
Some of the Harvard Observatory ‘computers’ in 1925. Annie Jump Cannon is seated fifth from left; Cecilia Payne is at the drafting table. HISTORY Women who read the stars Sue Nelson delights in Dava Sobel’s account of a rare band of human computers. here are half a million photographic magnitude, on the as computers at Harvard, a practice unique plates in the Harvard College Observa- photographic plates to the university. Within five years, the num- tory collection, all unique. They date to and computing its ber of paid female computers, from a range Tthe mid-1880s, and each can display the light location in the sky. of backgrounds, had risen to 14. Their efforts from 50,000 stars. These fragments of the Pickering was espe- would be boosted by philanthropist Cath- cosmos furthered our understanding of the cially interested in erine Wolfe Bruce, who in 1889 donated Universe. They also reflect the dedication and variable stars, whose US$50,000 to the observatory, convinced intelligence of extraordinary women whose light would brighten that the introduction of photography and stories are more than astronomical history: and fade over a spe- spectroscopy would advance the field. ARCHIVES UNIV. HARVARD COURTESY they reveal lives of ambition, aspiration and cific period. These The Glass The Glass Universe concentrates on a few of brilliance. It takes a talented writer to inter- fluctuations, captured Universe: How the Harvard computers. Williamina Fleming, weave professional achievement with per- on the plates, required the Ladies of a Scottish school teacher, arrived at the obser- sonal insight. By the time I finished The Glass constant observation, the Harvard vatory in 1879, pregnant and abandoned by Universe, Dava Sobel’s wonderful, meticulous but he couldn’t afford Observatory Took her husband. -
Barbara Mcclintock
Barbara McClintock Lee B. Kass and Paul Chomet Abstract Barbara McClintock, pioneering plant geneticist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983, is best known for her discovery of transposable genetic elements in corn. This chapter provides an overview of many of her key findings, some of which have been outlined and described elsewhere. We also provide a new look at McClintock’s early contributions, based on our readings of her primary publications and documents found in archives. We expect the reader will gain insight and appreciation for Barbara McClintock’s unique perspective, elegant experiments and unprecedented scientific achievements. 1 Introduction This chapter is focused on the scientific contributions of Barbara McClintock, pioneering plant geneticist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983 for her discovery of transposable genetic elements in corn. Her enlightening experiments and discoveries have been outlined and described in a number of papers and books, so it is not the aim of this report to detail each step in her scientific career and personal life but rather highlight many of her key findings, then refer the reader to the original reports and more detailed reviews. We hope the reader will gain insight and appreciation for Barbara McClintock’s unique perspective, elegant experiments and unprecedented scientific achievements. Barbara McClintock (1902–1992) was born in Hartford Connecticut and raised in Brooklyn, New York (Keller 1983). She received her undergraduate and graduate education at the New York State College of Agriculture at Cornell University. In 1923, McClintock was awarded the B.S. -
The Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead: a Cautionary Tale
The “Fateful Hoaxing” of Margaret Mead: A Cautionary Tale Author(s): Paul Shankman Source: Current Anthropology, Vol. 54, No. 1 (February 2013), pp. 51-70 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669033 . Accessed: 03/04/2013 14:08 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Current Anthropology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.138.170.182 on Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:08:27 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Current Anthropology Volume 54, Number 1, February 2013 51 The “Fateful Hoaxing” of Margaret Mead A Cautionary Tale by Paul Shankman CAϩ Online-Only Material: Supplements A and B In the Mead-Freeman controversy, Derek Freeman’s historical reconstruction of the alleged hoaxing of Margaret Mead in 1926 relied on three interviews with Fa’apua’a Fa’amu¯, Mead’s “principal informant,” who stated that she and another Samoan woman had innocently joked with Mead about their private lives. -
Timeline of Contents
Timeline of Contents Roots of Feminist Movement 1970 p.1 1866 Convention in Albany 1866 42 Women’s 1868 Boston Meeting 1868 1970 Artist Georgia O’Keeffe 1869 1869 Equal Rights Association 2 43 Gain for Women’s Job Rights 1971 3 Elizabeth Cady Stanton at 80 1895 44 Harriet Beecher Stowe, Author 1896 1972 Signs of Change in Media 1906 Susan B. Anthony Tribute 4 45 Equal Rights Amendment OK’d 1972 5 Women at Odds Over Suffrage 1907 46 1972 Shift From People to Politics 1908 Hopes of the Suffragette 6 47 High Court Rules on Abortion 1973 7 400,000 Cheer Suffrage March 1912 48 1973 Billie Jean King vs. Bobby Riggs 1912 Clara Barton, Red Cross Founder 8 49 1913 Harriet Tubman, Abolitionist Schools’ Sex Bias Outlawed 1974 9 Women at the Suffrage Convention 1913 50 1975 First International Women’s Day 1914 Women Making Their Mark 10 51 Margaret Mead, Anthropologist 1978 11 The Woman Sufferage Parade 1915 52 1979 Artist Louise Nevelson 1916-1917 Margaret Sanger on Trial 12 54 Philanthropist Brooke Astor 1980 13 Obstacles to Nationwide Vote 1918 55 1981 Justice Sandra Day O’Connor 1919 Suffrage Wins in House, Senate 14 56 Cosmo’s Helen Gurley Brown 1982 15 Women Gain the Right to Vote 1920 57 1984 Sally Ride and Final Frontier 1921 Birth Control Clinic Opens 16 58 Geraldine Ferraro Runs for VP 1984 17 Nellie Bly, Journalist 1922 60 Annie Oakley, Sharpshooter 1926 NOW: 20 Years Later 1928 Amelia Earhart Over Atlantic 18 Victoria Woodhull’s Legacy 1927 1986 61 Helen Keller’s New York 1932 62 Job Rights in Pregnancy Case 1987 19 1987 Facing the Subtler -
Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science
Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2018 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science Many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for nuclear research and instrumentation. The field has spun off: particle physics, nuclear astrophysics, nuclear power reactors, nuclear medicine, and nuclear weapons. Understanding how the nucleus works and applying that knowledge to technology has been one of the most significant accomplishments of twentieth century scientific research. Each prize was awarded for physics unless otherwise noted. Name(s) Discovery Year Henri Becquerel, Pierre Discovered spontaneous radioactivity 1903 Curie, and Marie Curie Ernest Rutherford Work on the disintegration of the elements and 1908 chemistry of radioactive elements (chem) Marie Curie Discovery of radium and polonium 1911 (chem) Frederick Soddy Work on chemistry of radioactive substances 1921 including the origin and nature of radioactive (chem) isotopes Francis Aston Discovery of isotopes in many non-radioactive 1922 elements, also enunciated the whole-number rule of (chem) atomic masses Charles Wilson Development of the cloud chamber for detecting 1927 charged particles Harold Urey Discovery of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) 1934 (chem) Frederic Joliot and Synthesis of several new radioactive elements 1935 Irene Joliot-Curie (chem) James Chadwick Discovery of the neutron 1935 Carl David Anderson Discovery of the positron 1936 Enrico Fermi New radioactive elements produced by neutron 1938 irradiation Ernest Lawrence