DOCSLIB.ORG

Bathusi Environmental Consulting Authority Reference N/A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BEC Report Reference: RHD – VLV - 2013 /24 Version: 2013 .11.03.2 Strategic Biodiversity EIA Assessment for the proposed Valleyview Residential Development in Witbank, Mpumalanga Province© compiled by Bathusi Environmental Consulting November 2013 - 082 3765 933 - [email protected] - 012 658 5579 - 086 636 5455 Biodiversity EIA Assessment Valleyview Residential Development, Witbank© I PROJECT DETAILS Client: Royal HaskoningDHV Strategic Biodiversity EIA Assessment for the proposed Valleyview Report name: Residential Development in Witbank, Mpumalanga Province Report type: Biodiversity Impact Assessment Report BEC Project number: RHD - VLV – 2013/24 Report Version: 2013.11.03.2 Compiled by: Riaan A. J. Robbeson (Pr.Sci.Nat.) - Bathusi Environmental Consulting Authority Reference N/A II SPECIALIST INVESTIGATORS The Natural Scientific Professions Act of 2003 aims to ‘ provide for the establishment of the South African Council of Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP), and for the registration of professional, candidate and certified natural scientists; and to provide for matters connected therewith’. Quoting the Natural Scientific Professions Act of 2003: ‘ Only a registered person may practice in a consulting capacity ’ (20(1) – pg 14). The following specialists contributed to this report: Botanical Investigator: Riaan Robbeson (Pr.Sci.Nat.) Qualification: M.Sc. (Botany), UP Affiliation: South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions Fields of Expertise: Botanical Scientist & Ecological Scientist Registration Number: 400005/03 Affiliation: Grassland Society of Southern Africa Membership Status: Professional Member Membership Number: 667.08/08 Faunal Investigator: Dewald Kamffer (Pr.Sci.Nat.) Qualification: M.Sc. (Conservation Biology), UP Affiliation: South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions Fields of expertise: Ecological Scientist & Zoological Scientist Registration number: 400204/05 III RESERVED COPYRIGHT This report, or any part thereof, may not be amended, rearranged or changed in any manner or form, without prior consent from the authors. This report may not be copied, reproduced or used in any manner, other than for the purpose of this particular environmental application, without specific written permission from Bathusi Environmental Consulting cc. This also refers to electronic copies of this report, which are supplied for the purpose of inclusion as part of other reports, including main reports. Similarly, any recommendations, statements or conclusions drawn from or based on this report must refer to this report. Should extractions from this report be included in a main report, this report must be included in its entirety as an appendix or separate section to the main report. Report: RHD – VLV - 2013/24 Version 2013.11.03.2 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ November 2013 i Biodiversity EIA Assessment Valleyview Residential Development, Witbank© IV CONTENTS I Project Details .......................................................................................................................................... i II Specialist Investigators ............................................................................................................................ i III Reserved Copyright ................................................................................................................................. i IV Contents .................................................................................................................................................. ii V List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ iv VI List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... iv VII List of Graphs ......................................................................................................................................... iv 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Biophysical Assessment ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Botanical Assessment ................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 Faunal Assessment .................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Ecological Impact Assessment & Discussion ........................................................................... 10 2 Terms of Reference for this Assessment .............................................................................................. 11 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 12 4 The Biophysical Environment ............................................................................................................... 14 4.1 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2 Land Cover & Land Use of the Region ..................................................................................... 14 4.3 Declared Areas of Conservation ............................................................................................... 15 4.4 Surface Water ........................................................................................................................... 20 4.5 Topography, Relief & Slopes .................................................................................................... 20 4.6 Geology ..................................................................................................................................... 21 4.7 Land Types & Soils ................................................................................................................... 21 5 Mpumalanga Biodiversity Conservation Plan ....................................................................................... 23 5.1 Terrestrial Biodiversity Sensitivities on a Local Scale .............................................................. 23 5.1.1 Category Designation ........................................................................................................... 23 5.1.2 MBCP Ecological Corridors .................................................................................................. 24 5.1.3 Development Restrictions in Terms of the MBCP ................................................................ 25 6 Background to the Regional Ecology .................................................................................................... 28 7 Botanical Assessment ........................................................................................................................... 30 7.1 Regional Floristic Traits ............................................................................................................ 30 7.2 Phytodiversity ............................................................................................................................ 31 7.2.1 Regional Phytodiversity (POSA, 2012)................................................................................. 31 7.2.2 Survey Results - Recorded Phytodiversity (Species Richness) ........................................... 32 7.3 Plant Taxa of Conservation Importance ................................................................................... 34 7.3.1 Available Information ............................................................................................................ 34 7.3.2 Survey Results (January 2013) ............................................................................................ 36 7.3.3 Weeds and Invasive Plants .................................................................................................. 37 7.4 Vegetation Development Drivers .............................................................................................. 38 7.5 Macro Habitat types & Variations.............................................................................................. 38 7.5.1 Degraded & Transformed Habitat ......................................................................................... 39 7.5.2 Wetland Habitat Types ......................................................................................................... 41 7.5.3 Rocky Grassland Habitat ...................................................................................................... 45 7.6 Floristic Sensitivity of the Study site ......................................................................................... 51 7.7 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 55 8 Faunal Assessment .............................................................................................................................. 57 8.1 Regional Faunal
Recommended publications
  • African Butterfly News Can Be Downloaded Here

    African Butterfly News Can Be Downloaded Here

    LATE SUMMER EDITION: JANUARY / AFRICAN FEBRUARY 2018 - 1 BUTTERFLY THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA NEWS LATEST NEWS Welcome to the first newsletter of 2018! I trust you all have returned safely from your December break (assuming you had one!) and are getting into the swing of 2018? With few exceptions, 2017 was a very poor year butterfly-wise, at least in South Africa. The drought continues to have a very negative impact on our hobby, but here’s hoping that 2018 will be better! Braving the Great Karoo and Noorsveld (Mark Williams) In the first week of November 2017 Jeremy Dobson and I headed off south from Egoli, at the crack of dawn, for the ‘Harde Karoo’. (Is there a ‘Soft Karoo’?) We had a very flexible plan for the six-day trip, not even having booked any overnight accommodation. We figured that finding a place to commune with Uncle Morpheus every night would not be a problem because all the kids were at school. As it turned out we did not have to spend a night trying to kip in the Pajero – my snoring would have driven Jeremy nuts ... Friday 3 November The main purpose of the trip was to survey two quadrants for the Karoo BioGaps Project. One of these was on the farm Lushof, 10 km west of Loxton, and the other was Taaiboschkloof, about 50 km south-east of Loxton. The 1 000 km drive, via Kimberley, to Loxton was accompanied by hot and windy weather. The temperature hit 38 degrees and was 33 when the sun hit the horizon at 6 pm.
  • The Multicoloured Asian Ladybird Beetle, Harmonia Axyridis

    The Multicoloured Asian Ladybird Beetle, Harmonia Axyridis

    Research in Action South African Journal of Science 103, March/April 2007 123 adults and larvae of an unfamiliar lady- Discovery of an alien invasive, bird beetle species were collected from wheat. These beetles attracted attention predatory insect in South Africa: the as both larvae and adults were numerous and were clearly efficient predators of all multicoloured Asian ladybird beetle, the aphid species on wheat at the time. The beetles were positively identified as Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) HA at the South African National Collec- (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) tion of Insects (SANC), Pretoria. Voucher specimens have been deposited in the SANC, the Transvaal Museum (TMSA), Riaan Stalsa* and Goddy Prinsloob Pretoria, and the Iziko South African Museum (SAMC), Cape Town. This species was previously observed, HE ASIAN LADYBIRD BEETLE, HARMONIA because it preys voraciously on diverse but not collected, at Tygerhoek in Sep- axyridis (HA) (Insecta: Coleoptera: pestiferous aphids and other soft-bodied tember/October 2004, when fairly large TCoccinellidae), is a generalist predator long arthropod pests on various cultivated numbers of aphids were present on valued as a biocontrol agent of pestiferous crops.6–9 Recently, it began ‘changing’ its aphids and other invertebrates. However, HA wheat. They were not detected during has become highly invasive in North America spots to emerge as a potentially invasive 2005, when aphid infestations were very 6,7,9,10 and Europe. The beetle is eurytopic, broadly and harmful organism. low. In October 2006, adults, larvae and polyphagous, very dispersive and pheno- The main aim of this paper is to record eggs (field-collected and positively associ- typically highly plastic.
  • Northern Cape Provincial Gazette Vol 15 No

    Northern Cape Provincial Gazette Vol 15 No

    ·.:.:-:-:-:-:.::p.=~==~ ::;:;:;:;:::::t}:::::::;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::;:::;:;:.-:-:.:-:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:::-:-:-:-: ..........•............:- ;.:.:.;.;.;.•.;. ::::;:;::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;;:::::. '.' ::: .... , ..:. ::::::::::::::::::::~:~~~~::::r~~~~\~:~ i~ftfj~i!!!J~?!I~~~~I;Ii!!!J!t@tiit):fiftiIit\t~r\t ', : :.;.:.:.:.:.: ::;:;:::::;:::::::::::;:::::::::.::::;:::::::;:::::::::;:;:::;:;:;:;:: :.:.:.: :.:. ::~:}:::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::tf~:::::::::::::::: ;:::;:::;:::;:;:;:::::::::;:;:::::: ::::::;::;:;:;:;=;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;::::::::;:.: :.;.:.:.;.;.:.;.:.:-:.;.: :::;:' """"~'"W" ;~!~!"IIIIIII ::::::::::;:::::;:;:;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:::::..;:;:;:::;: 1111.iiiiiiiiiiii!fillimiDw"""'8m\r~i~ii~:i:] :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:':.:.:.::::::::::::::{::::::::::::;:: ;.;:;:;:;:t;:;~:~;j~Ij~j~)~( ......................: ;.: :.:.:.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.:.:.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.:.; :.:.;.:.: ':;:::::::::::-:.::::::;:::::;;::::::::::::: EXTRAORDINARY • BUITENGEWONE Provincial Gazette iGazethi YePhondo Kasete ya Profensi Provinsiale Koerant Vol. 15 KIMBERLEY, 19 DECEMBER 2008 DESEMBER No. 1258 PROVINCE OF THE NORTHERN CAPE 2 No. 1258 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, 19 DECEMBER 2008 CONTENTS • INHOUD Page Gazette No. No. No. GENERAL NOTICE· ALGEMENE KENNISGEWING 105 Northern Cape Nature Conservation Bill, 2009: For public comment . 3 1258 105 Noord-Kaap Natuurbewaringswetontwerp, 2009: Vir openbare kommentaar . 3 1258 PROVINSIE NOORD-KAAP BUITENGEWONE PROVINSIALE KOERANT, 19 DESEMBER 2008 No.1258 3 GENERAL NOTICE NOTICE
  • Phylogeny of Ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): Are the Subfamilies Monophyletic?

    Phylogeny of Ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): Are the Subfamilies Monophyletic?

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54 (2010) 833–848 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): Are the subfamilies monophyletic? A. Magro a,b,1, E. Lecompte b,c,*,1, F. Magné b,c, J.-L. Hemptinne a,b, B. Crouau-Roy b,c a Université de Toulouse, ENFA, EDB (Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique), 2 route de Narbonne, F-31320 Castanet Tolosan, France b CNRS, EDB (Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique), F-31062 Toulouse, France c Université de Toulouse, UPS, EDB (Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique), 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse, France article info abstract Article history: The Coccinellidae (ladybirds) is a highly speciose family of the Coleoptera. Ladybirds are well known Received 20 April 2009 because of their use as biocontrol agents, and are the subject of many ecological studies. However, little Revised 15 October 2009 is known about phylogenetic relationships of the Coccinellidae, and a precise evolutionary framework is Accepted 16 October 2009 needed for the family. This paper provides the first phylogenetic reconstruction of the relationships Available online 10 November 2009 within the Coccinellidae based on analysis of five genes: the 18S and 28S rRNA nuclear genes and the mitochondrial 12S, 16S rRNA and cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) genes. The phylogenetic relation- Keywords: ships of 67 terminal taxa, representative of all the subfamilies of the Coccinellidae (61 species, 37 genera), Phylogeny and relevant outgroups, were reconstructed using multiple approaches, including Bayesian inference Coccinellidae Partitioned analyses with partitioning strategies. The recovered phylogenies are congruent and show that the Coccinellinae Evolution is monophyletic but the Coccidulinae, Epilachninae, Scymninae and Chilocorinae are paraphyletic.
  • Im Auftrage Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Für Säugetierkunde Ev

    Im Auftrage Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Für Säugetierkunde Ev

    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ 6 Maria Jose Löpez-Fuster, J. Gosdlbez und V. Sans-Coma Gomez, L; Sans-Coma, V. (1975): Edad relativa de Crocidura russula en egagröpilas de Tyto alba en el nordeste iberico. Mise. Zool. 63, 209-212. Gosälbez, J.; Löpez-Fuster, M. J.; Durfort, M. (1979): Ein neues Färbungsverfahren für Hodenzellen von Kleinsäugetieren. Säugetierkdl. Mitt. 27, 303-305. Hellwing, S. (1971): Maintenance and reproduetion in the white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula monacha Thomas, in captivity. Z. Säugetierkunde 36, 103-113. — (1973): The postnatal development of the white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula monacha in captivity. Z. Säugetierkunde 38, 257-270. — (1975): Sexual reeeptivity and oestrus in the white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula monacha. J. Reprod. Fert. 45, 469-477. Kahmann, H.; Kahmann, E. (1954): La musaraigne de Corse. Mammalia 18, 129-158. Niethammer, J. (1970): Uber Kleinsäuger aus Portugal. Bonn. zool. Beitr. 21, 89-118. Röben, P. (1969): Die Spitzmäuse (Soricidae) der Heidelberg Umgebung. Säugetierkdl. Mitt. 17, 42-62. Saint-Girons, M. C. (1973): Les Mammiferes de France et du Benelux (faune marine exceptee) Paris: Doin. Sans-Coma, V.; Gomez, I.; Gosälbez, J. (1976): Eine Untersuchung an der Hausspitzmaus {Crocidura russula Hermann, 1780) auf der Insel Meda Grossa (Katalonien, Spanien). Säugetierkdl. Mitt. 24, 279-288. Vesmanis, I.; Vesmanis, A. (1979): Ein Vorschlag zur einheitlichen Altersabstufung bei Wimperspitz- mäusen (Mammalia: Insectivora: Crocidura). Bonn. zool. Beitr. 30, 7-13. Vogel, P. (1972): Beitrag zur Fortpflanzungsbiologie der Gattungen Sorex, Neomys und Crocidura (Soricidae). Verh. Naturf. Ges. Basel 82, 165-192. Anschriften der Verfasser: Dra. Maria Jose Löpez-Fuster und Prof.
  • Olympus AH Eco Assessment

    Olympus AH Eco Assessment

    Reg No. 2005/122/329/23 VAT Reg No. 4150274472 PO Box 751779 Gardenview 2047 Tel: 011 616 7893 Fax: 086 724 3132 Email: [email protected] www.sasenvironmental.co.za BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT AS PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION AND WATER USE LICENCING PROCESS FOR THE FAIRVIEW TAILINGS DAM AND HISTORIC DUMP RECLAMATION PROJECT NEAR BARBERTON, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE Prepared for Cabanga Environmental November 2019 Part C: Faunal Assessment Prepared by: Scientific Terrestrial Services Report author: D. van der Merwe Report reviewer: C. Hooton S. van Staden (Pri Sci. Nat) Report Reference: STS 190055 Date: November 2019 STS 190055 – Part C: Faunal Assessment November 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1. Background .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Assumptions and Limitations ........................................................................................ 2 2.1 General approach ......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Sensitivity Mapping ...................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Faunal Habitat .............................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Mammals.................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Avifauna ....................................................................................................................
  • Olympus AH Eco Assessment

    Olympus AH Eco Assessment

    FAUNAL AND FLORAL ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AS PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR THE PROPOSED ERASMUS PARK PHASE 2 TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT, ERASMUSRAND, GAUTENG. Prepared for Nali Sustainability Solutions February 2019 Section C: Faunal Assessment Prepared by: Scientific Terrestrial Services Report author: C. Hooton Report reviewer: K. Marais (Pr. Sci. Nat) Report Reference: STS 180084 Date: February 2019 Scientific Terrestrial Services CC CC Reg No 2005/122329/23 PO Box 751779 Gardenview 2047 Tel: 011 616 7893 Fax: 086 724 3132 E-mail: [email protected] STS 180084 February 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY From the faunal assessment it can be concluded that there are four habitat units encompassed within the study area, namely Senegalia caffra – Vachellia karroo Woodland, Rocky Grassland, Degraded Hyparrhenia Grassland and Freshwater Habitat. These habitat range from moderately-low to moderately high sensitivities Based on the impact assessment, the impacts on faunal habitat, diversity and SCC within the different habitat units varies from low to high significance during the construction and the operational phase of the project prior to mitigation taking place. With effective mitigation implemented, all impacts may be reduced to very-low to medium-low levels. It is the opinion of the ecologists that this study provides the relevant information required in order to implement an Integrated Environmental Management (IEM) plan and to ensure that the best long-term use of the ecological resources in the study area will be made in support of the principle of sustainable development. Scientific Terrestrial Services (STS) was appointed to conduct a faunal and floral ecological assessment for the proposed Erasmus Park development on the remaining extent of the farm Waterkloof 378 JR, Erasmusrand, Gauteng Province (hereafter referred to as the ‘study area’).
  • Chapter 15 the Mammals of Angola

    Chapter 15 the Mammals of Angola

    Chapter 15 The Mammals of Angola Pedro Beja, Pedro Vaz Pinto, Luís Veríssimo, Elena Bersacola, Ezequiel Fabiano, Jorge M. Palmeirim, Ara Monadjem, Pedro Monterroso, Magdalena S. Svensson, and Peter John Taylor Abstract Scientific investigations on the mammals of Angola started over 150 years ago, but information remains scarce and scattered, with only one recent published account. Here we provide a synthesis of the mammals of Angola based on a thorough survey of primary and grey literature, as well as recent unpublished records. We present a short history of mammal research, and provide brief information on each species known to occur in the country. Particular attention is given to endemic and near endemic species. We also provide a zoogeographic outline and information on the conservation of Angolan mammals. We found confirmed records for 291 native species, most of which from the orders Rodentia (85), Chiroptera (73), Carnivora (39), and Cetartiodactyla (33). There is a large number of endemic and near endemic species, most of which are rodents or bats. The large diversity of species is favoured by the wide P. Beja (*) CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal CEABN-InBio, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves”, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] P. Vaz Pinto Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] L. Veríssimo Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola e-mail: [email protected] E.
  • Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report

    Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report

    YOCTOLUX INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD PROPOSED NEW COAL MINING ACTIVITIES AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE ON PORTION 38 OF THE FARM ELANDSPRUIT 291 JS, MIDDELBURG, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE MDEDET Reference: 17/2/3N-247 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 17/2/3NSUBMITTED-247 TO: MPUMALANGA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM (MDEDET) Nkangala District Directorate: Environmental Impact Management P. O. Box 7255 Witbank 1035 013 692 5843 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT PROPOSED YOCTOLUX COAL MINE LOCATED ON PORTION 38 OF THE FARM ELANDSPRUIT 291 JS, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE October 2014 MDEDET REF: 17/2/3N-247 ENVASS REF: 089/12_13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction and project description The Applicant, Yoctolux Investments (Pty) Ltd, (who is both the mineral right and surface right holder of Portion 38 of the farm Elandspruit 291 JS) is making an application for Environmental Authorisation for the establishment of a new coal mine on Portion 38 of the farm Elandspruit 291 JS, in Middelburg, Mpumalanga Province, in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, Act No. 107 of 1998 (as amended). This Application for Environmental Authorisation is being made to the Competent Authority namely the Mpumalanga Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism (MDEDET), and is required because the proposed development includes activities which are listed in terms of the NEMA Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations 2010. Environmental Assurance (Pty) Ltd. (ENVASS) was appointed by Yoctolux Investments (Pty) Ltd. to undertake the Scoping and Environmental Impact Assessment process which requires compliance with the EIA Regulations of 2010, promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (No. 107 of 1998) (NEMA) (as amended).
  • Technical Report for the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan – MBSP 2015

    Technical Report for the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan – MBSP 2015

    Technical Report for the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan – MBSP 2015 June 2015 Authored by: Mervyn C. Lötter Mpumalanga Tourism &Parks Agency Private bag X1088 Lydenburg, 1120 1 Citation: This document should be cited as: Lötter, M.C. 2015. Technical Report for the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan – MBSP. Mpumalanga Tourism & Parks Agency, Mbombela (Nelspruit). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are many individuals and organisations that contributed towards the success of the MBSP. In particular we gratefully acknowledge the ArcGIS software grant from the ESRI Conservation Program. In addition the WWF-SA and SANBIs Grasslands Programme played an important role in supporting the development and financing parts of the MBSP. The development of the MBSP spatial priorities took a few years to complete with inputs from many different people and organisations. Some of these include: MTPA scientists, Amanda Driver, Byron Grant, Jeff Manuel, Mathieu Rouget, Jeanne Nel, Stephen Holness, Phil Desmet, Boyd Escott, Charles Hopkins, Tony de Castro, Domitilla Raimondo, Lize Von Staden, Warren McCleland, Duncan McKenzie, Natural Scientific Services (NSS), South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Strategic Environmental Focus (SESFA),Birdlife SA, Endangered Wildlife Trust, Graham Henning, Michael Samways, John Simaika, Gerhard Diedericks, Warwick Tarboton, Jeremy Dobson, Ian Engelbrecht, Geoff Lockwood, John Burrows, Barbara Turpin, Sharron Berruti, Craig Whittington-Jones, Willem Froneman, Peta Hardy, Ursula Franke, Louise Fourie, Avian Demography
  • Determining the Conservation Value of Land in Mpumalanga April 2002 Prepared for DWAF/DFID STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

    Determining the Conservation Value of Land in Mpumalanga April 2002 Prepared for DWAF/DFID STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

    Determining the conservation value of land in Mpumalanga April 2002 Prepared for DWAF/DFID STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared by A.J. Emery, M. Lötter and S.D. Williamson Mpumalanga Parks Board Private Bag X11338 Nelspruit 1200 [email protected] Executive Summary This report is aimed at identifying areas of biodiversity importance within Mpumalanga through the use of existing data and expert knowledge, and the development of species and Geographic Information System (GIS) databases. This study adopted a similar approach to that developed by the Kwa-zulu Natal Nature Conservation Services in their report “Determining the conservation value of land in KwaZulu-Natal”. The approach was based on the broad Keystone Centre (1991) definition of biodiversity (the variety of life and its processes), and therefore analysed the complete biodiversity hierarchy excluding the genetic level. The hierarchy included landscapes, three well-defined communities, one floristic region, one broad vegetation community and eight broad species groups (Figure 1.1). The species groups included threatened plants, economically important medicinal plants, mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, fish and invertebrates. Species data and GIS coverages were obtained from a wide variety of sources. Digital coverages of two detailed vegetation communities, wetlands and forest, were compiled from all available sources. Special effort was made to map additional forests and wetlands that had not previously been mapped. Acocks Veld Types and Centres and Regions of Plant Endemism (Phytochoria) were used to define the broad plant communities. The species data were compiled from published papers, private and public collections in herbaria and museums, personal observations and MPB records. The resulting species databases afforded the MPB the opportunity to capture all its species records in databases, which in turn were used to investigate the various species layers.
  • Water Hyacinth, Eichhornia Crassipes (Mart.) Important?

    Water Hyacinth, Eichhornia Crassipes (Mart.) Important?

    ESSA and ZSSA combined congress 2017 CSIR, PRETORIA 3-7 JULY 2017 2017 COMBINED CONGRESS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL AND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETIES OF SOUTHERN AFRICA CSIR INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTRE, PRETORIA, SOUTH AFRICA ABSTRACTS AND PROGRAMME 2017 COMBINED CONGRESS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL AND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETIES OF SOUTHERN AFRICA SPONSORS Jewel Beetle sponsor - R50,000 Amethyst Sunbird sponsor - R25,000 Opal Butterfly sponsor - R12,500 Exhibitors The Entomological Society of Southern Africa and the Zoological Society of Southern Africa 2 CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY Canadian Journal of Zoology Published since 1929, this monthly journal reports on primary research in the broad field of zoology. Offering rapid publication, no submission or page charges, broad readership and indexing, liberal author rights, and options for open access. Canadian Journal of Zoology is published by Canadian Science Publishing. www.nrcresearchpress.com/cjz Canadian Journal of Zoology CALL FOR PAPERS Published since 1929, this monthly journal reports on primary research contributed by respected international scientists in the broad field of zoology, including behaviour, biochemistry and physiology, developmental biology, ecology, genetics, morphology and ultrastructure, parasitology and pathology, and systematics and evolution. It also invites experts to submit review articles on topics of current interest. The Canadian Journal of Zoology is proudly affiliated with the Canadian Society of Zoologists. Editor: Dr. Helga Guderley Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada Editor: Dr. R. Mark Brigham University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada To learn more about CJZ, visit: nrcresearchpress.com/cjz For information on how to submit, visit: nrcresearchpress.com/page/cjz/authors Canadian Science Publishing (CSP) publishes the award-winning NRC Research Press suite of journals, many of which have been in publication since 1929 and FACETS, Canada’s first multidisciplinary open access science journal.