DOCSLIB.ORG

BAARLE-HERTOG RUP Randzones

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BAARLE-HERTOG RUP Randzones BAARLE-HERTOG RUP randzones verzoek tot raadpleging april 2017 colofon opdrachtgever: Gemeente Baarle-Hertog project: RUP randzones fase: verzoek tot raadpleging datum: April 2017 opdrachthouder: Dienstverlenende Vereniging Intergemeentelijke Samenwerking IOK Antwerpseweg 1, 2440 Geel - www.iok.be projectteam: IOK plangroep projectcoördinator: Stijn Sneyers Projectverantwoordelijke: Rhea Denissen ruimtelijke planning: Rhea Denissen, Greet De Ruysscher, Luk Helsen, Dirk Hey- len, Liselotte Raes, David Rombaut, Marijke Sannen, Stijn Projectverantwoordelijke Projectcoördinator Sneyers, Danny Vaes, An Vandeplas, Johan Van Opstal Rhea Denissen Stijn Sneyers CAD(naam)-GIS: Tanja Van Dooren, Anja Dello erkend ruimtelijk planner secretariaat: Annick SprengersErkend ruimtelijk planner RUP randzones Toepassing van Titel II, hoofdstuk II van de Vlaamse Codex Ruimtelijke Ordening Gezien en (voorlopig/definitief) vastgesteld door de gemeenteraad van de gemeente Baarle-Hertog in zitting van (datum) de secretaris, de voorzitter, J. Vervoort L. Van Tilburg RUP randzones Baarle-Hertog – verzoek tot raadpleging IOK plangroep Inhoud 3.5 Programma ..................................................................................................... 71 INHOUD 3.6 Aandachtspunten en randvoorwaarden .......................................................... 72 3.7 Visie en ontwerp ............................................................................................. 76 DEEL 1 TOELICHTINGSNOTA ...............................................................1 3.8 Op te heffen voorschriften .............................................................................. 77 I ALGEMEEN DEEL ........................................................................ 3 4 Woonpercelen Zondereigen .................................................................... 78 1 Situering en doelstelling ............................................................................. 3 4.1 Afbakening plangebied ................................................................................... 78 4.2 Bestemmingen ............................................................................................... 78 2 Planologisch – juridisch kader ................................................................... 5 4.3 Sectoraal juridisch kader ................................................................................ 79 2.1 Ruimtelijk structuurplan Vlaanderen................................................................. 5 4.4 Bestaande ruimtelijke structuur ...................................................................... 82 2.2 Afbakening natuurlijke en agrarische structuur ................................................ 6 4.5 Programma ..................................................................................................... 86 2.3 Ruimtelijk structuurplan Provincie Antwerpen .................................................. 8 4.6 Aandachtspunten en randvoorwaarden .......................................................... 86 2.4 Provinciaal ruimtelijk uitvoeringsplan Rondweg ............................................... 8 4.7 Visie en ontwerp ............................................................................................. 90 2.5 Gemeentelijk Ruimtelijk structuurplan Baarle-Hertog ....................................... 9 4.8 Op te heffen voorschriften .............................................................................. 90 2.6 Structuurvisie Baarle-Nassau ......................................................................... 12 II DEELPLANNEN ......................................................................... 15 DEEL 2 BIJLAGEN ............................................................................... 91 1 Centrumparking Kapelstraat .................................................................... 15 I SCREENING OP PLANMER ......................................................... 92 1.1 Afbakening plangebied ................................................................................... 15 1 Algemeen ................................................................................................. 92 1.2 Bestemmingen ............................................................................................... 15 1.1 Toetsing planMER-plicht ................................................................................ 92 1.3 Sectoraal juridisch kader ................................................................................ 17 1.2 Methodologie .................................................................................................. 92 1.4 Bestaande ruimtelijke structuur ...................................................................... 20 1.3 Grensoverschrijdende milieueffecten ............................................................. 95 1.5 Programma - behoeften ................................................................................. 27 1.4 Gebruik van hulpbronnen ............................................................................... 95 1.6 Verkeersinfrastructuur .................................................................................... 30 1.5 Leemten in de kennis ..................................................................................... 95 1.7 Aandachtspunten en randvoorwaarden ......................................................... 30 1.6 Cumulatieve effecten ...................................................................................... 95 1.8 Visie en ontwerp ............................................................................................ 34 1.7 Alternatieven .................................................................................................. 95 1.9 Op te heffen voorschriften .............................................................................. 35 1.8 Referentiesituatie ........................................................................................... 96 2 Woonlint Gierlestraat ............................................................................... 36 2 Beoordeling milieueffecten ...................................................................... 96 2.1 Afbakening plangebied ................................................................................... 36 2.1 Centrumparking Kapelstraat ........................................................................... 96 2.2 Bestemmingen ............................................................................................... 37 2.2 Woonlint Gierlestraat .................................................................................... 104 2.3 Sectoraal juridisch kader ................................................................................ 40 2.3 Hoogbraak .................................................................................................... 110 2.4 Bestaande ruimtelijke structuur ...................................................................... 44 2.4 Woonpercelen Zondereigen ......................................................................... 115 2.5 Programma .................................................................................................... 52 3 Globale conclusie .................................................................................. 121 2.6 Aandachtspunten en randvoorwaarden ......................................................... 53 2.7 Visie en ontwerp ............................................................................................ 57 2.8 Op te heffen voorschriften .............................................................................. 58 3 Hoogbraak ............................................................................................... 59 3.1 Afbakening plangebied ................................................................................... 59 3.2 Bestemmingen ............................................................................................... 59 3.3 Sectoraal juridisch kader ................................................................................ 63 3.4 Bestaande ruimtelijke structuur ...................................................................... 66 RUP randzones Baarle-Hertog – verzoek tot raadpleging IOK plangroep Lijst figuren Figuur 31: huidig herbevestigd agrarisch gebied ter hoogte van Zondereigen ... 32 Figuur 1: situering deelplannen binnen Baarle-Hertog ....................................... 3 Figuur 32: schetsontwerp deelplan centrumparking Kapelstraat ........................ 34 Figuur 2: situering plangebied centrumparking Kapelstraat ............................... 3 Figuur 33: plangebied deelplan woonlint Gierlestraat ........................................ 36 Figuur 3: situering woonlint Gierlestraat............................................................. 4 Figuur 34: uittreksel gewestplan Turnhout – deelplan woonlint Gierlestraat ...... 37 Figuur 4: situering plangebied Hoogbraak ......................................................... 4 Figuur 35: uittreksel bestemmingsplan Dorpen Baarle-Nassau omgeving Figuur 5: situering plangebied restperceel Zondereigen .................................... 4 woonlint Gierlestraat ......................................................................... 37 Figuur 6: uittreksel gewenste ruimtelijke structuur regio Noorderkempen Figuur 36: uittreksel bestemmingsplan Buitengebied Baarle-Nassau omgeving (AGNAS) ............................................................................................. 7 woonlint Gierlestraat
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 52 - the Enclaves and Counter-Enclaves of Baarle (B/NL) by Frank Jacobs December 12, 2006, 1:04 PM
    52 - The Enclaves and Counter-enclaves of Baarle (B/NL) by Frank Jacobs December 12, 2006, 1:04 PM One of the unlikeliest complexes of enclaves and exclaves in the world is to be found on the Belgian-Dutch border, and is centred on Baarle. This town, while surrounded entirely by Dutch territory, consists of two separate administrative units, one of which is the Dutch commune of Baarle-Nassau, the other being the Belgian commune of Baarle-Hertog.For an exhaustive history, please visit this page of the Buffalo Ontology Site. That same story, more succinctly: here… The Belgian-Dutch border was established in the Maastricht Treaty of 1843, which mostly confirmed boundaries which were a few centuries old (as the separation of Belgium and the Netherlands has its origin in the religious wars of the 16th century). In the area around Baarle, it proved impossible to reach a definitive agreement. Instead, both governments opted to allocate nationality separately to each of the 5.732 parcels of land in the 50 km between border posts 214 and 215. These parcels ‘coagulated’ into a veritable archipelago of 20-odd Belgian exclaves in and around Baarle. In turn, some of these Belgian exclaves completely surround pieces of Dutch territory. Deliciously complicating this picture is a small enclave of Baarle-Nassau situated entirely within Belgium proper – and there’s even a Belgian parcel within a Dutch parcel within a Belgian enclave, which in turn is surrounded entirely by Dutch territory… Numerous attempts have been made throughout the centuries to (literally) rectify the situation, but they have obviously all failed – leaving the double entity of Baarle-Nassau/Baarle-Hertog with some absurd folklore.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Worst That Could Happen? Reexamining the 24–25 June 1967 Tornado Outbreak Over Western Europe
    APRIL 2018 A N T O N E S C U E T A L . 323 What is the Worst That Could Happen? Reexamining the 24–25 June 1967 Tornado Outbreak over Western Europe BOGDAN ANTONESCU Centre for Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, and European Severe Storms Laboratory, Wessling, Germany JONATHAN G. FAIRMAN JR. AND DAVID M. SCHULTZ Centre for Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (Manuscript received 17 July 2017, in final form 6 December 2017) ABSTRACT On 24–25 June 1967 one of the most intense European tornado outbreaks produced extensive damage (approximately 960 houses damaged or destroyed) and resulted in 232 injuries and 15 fatalities in France, Belgium, and the Netherlands. The 24–25 June 1967 tornado outbreak shows that Europe is highly vulnerable to tornadoes. To better understand the impact of European tornadoes and how this impact changed over time, the question is raised, ‘‘What would happen if an outbreak similar to the 1967 one occurred 50 years later in 2017 over France, Belgium, and the Netherlands?’’ Transposing the seven tornado tracks from the June 1967 outbreak over the modern landscape would potentially result in 24 990 buildings being impacted, 255–2580 injuries, and 17–172 fatalities. To determine possible worst-case scenarios, the tornado tracks are moved in a systematic way around their observed positions and positioned over modern maps of buildings and population. The worst-case scenario estimates are 146 222 buildings impacted, 2550–25 440 injuries, and 170–1696 fatalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet in Flanders
    Quirky Flanders 20 of the region’s oddest or most unexpected activities CONTENT Derek Blyth Author Quirky Flanders 2 / Walk barefoot in Limburg 12 / Discover the new Berlin landers is full of offbeat things to do. 3 / Visit a bizarre Belgian enclave 13 / Take a foodie tour in the Westhoek They can be surprising, sometimes 4 / Walk through a forest that was once 14 / Explore the dark secrets of a Fa little disturbing, but always a battlefield Brabant Castle unexpected. Most are off the beaten track, 5 / Find old Antwerp in a lost Scheldt 15 / Cycle down the golden river away from the crowds, in places that are village 16 / Sneak a look at the forbidden sometimes hard to find. 6 / Follow the Brussels street art trail sculpture 7 / Find the Bruges no one knows 17 / Stroll through eccentric You might need to ask in a local bar 8 / Take the world’s longest tram ride architecture for directions or set off on foot down a 9 / Admire the station that moved 36 18 / Take a night walk in Ghent muddy track. But it’s worth making the metres 19 / Hop on a free bike to explore effort to find them, because they tell you 10 / Wander along Mechelen’s lost river Ostend’s hinterland something about Flanders that you don’t 11 / Visit the world’s most beautiful 20 / Walk under the river in Antwerp read in the guide books or learn from chocolate shop Wikipedia. Quirky Flanders 2 WALK BAREFOOT IN LIMBURG VISIT A BIZARRE BELGIAN ENCLAVE he village of Baarle-Hertog is described as a Belgian enclave within the Nether- Tlands, but it’s a lot more complicated than that.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty of Baarle Hertog
    Treaty Of Baarle Hertog Drossiest Emmett peculiarised talkatively. Oren is domed and gob ploddingly as violaceous Merrill alembicatedassibilates regularly Percival and conceded disseized quite thoroughgoingly. conspicuously butUmbonate coaxes Fultonher fly-fishing still strike: exultingly. weather-beaten and Download Treaty Of Baarle Hertog pdf. Download Treaty Of Baarle Hertog doc. Example of house thebelonged delta works to you are are part dutch of theseenclaves cookies could to it. the Passport common. when Very according big difference to avoid in baarlegetting openthe metal countryside enters Stocktonthe blue, euis enough member to states the house are. Pawnednumbers a is couple a good of idea their of borders such an run upgrade straight, to check the woods. prices Failure carefully. to certainvan leuven, time nowyou drivethe door! on the Getting new posts the european by the border treaty is baarle a trip. hertog Things work technological of my pictures in the of congress affairs is was a fromnot as the both current villages buildings. exist as Learn the use. today Photograph even more taken quickly by showcrossing which the of seat one. of Plan przemyśl a mysterious was butter red of baarlethe river open between every dealing example with of thesewhite andcookies you. are Subsequent just kind of negotiations north brabant, failed but to the the uk. european Make sure treaty you of certainactually time be read to raise the theselongest territories siege of becamenew users constituents to live in? ofRed przemyśl of the schengen was on pavements,treaty that show but the you sameglobe. street At a major can tell european what does treaty international hertog took realities.
    [Show full text]
  • Enclaveroute Baarle-Hertog - Baarle-Nassau - 3
    PRAKTISCHE INFO 50 km Startplaats: Gemeentehuis Baarle-Hertog, Parallelweg 1, 2387 Baarle-Hertog Parking: De Loswal, Loswal, Baarle-Nassau (gratis) Hoe fiets je de route? Je volgt de zeshoekige bordjes met blauwe pijl. Het vlaggetje op de bordjes ENCLAVEROUTE BAARLE-HERTOG - BAARLE-NASSAU - 3. Op het kruispunt van het Bels Lijntje met de Pastoor de Katerstraat staat geeft aan of je je op Belgisch of op Nederlands grondgebied bevindt. Een een Nederlandse brievenbus. Verderop, aan het Cultuurcentrum Baarle, grote fiets duidt op de lange lus, een driewielertje op de kindvriendelijke lus. MERKSPLAS - HOOGSTRATEN een Belgische. Gescheiden postbedeling, maar wel een gezamenlijk cul- tureel centrum, met huisnummer 5 voor de Belgische post en nummer 7 Bij de kindvriendelijke lus van 22 km hoort een opdrachtenboekje dat je gratis voor de Nederlandse. kan downloaden van www.kempen.be, of kopen bij Toerisme Baarle-Hertog- 4. In de Pastoor de Katerstraat vertellen maar liefst vier verschillende versies Nassau, Singel 1, 5111 CC Baarle-Nassau, T. +31 (0)13 507 99 21. van het straatnaambordje in welke straat je bent. 5. Voor de inwoners van Baarle geldt de ‘voordeurregel’: de bewoners van Lengte: een huis moeten zich laten inschrijven in het bevolkingsregister van de Basistraject: 50 km gemeente waarin hun voordeur staat. Ook voorzieningen als elektriciteit en Verkorting: 40 km telefonie halen ze in dat land. De woning in Loveren (vlak voor het pleintje) vormt de uitzondering: hier loopt de grens dwars door de voordeur! Het Surf naar www.kempen.be voor toeristische info, fietsnieuws en logeertips. huis telt dan ook twee adressen: Loveren 2 in Baarle-Hertog en Loveren 19 in Baarle-Nassau.
    [Show full text]
  • Van Wirskaante
    I r HEEMKUNDE-KRING "AMALIA VAN SOLMS" Baarle-Hertog-Nassau De Heemkunde-Kring 'Amalia van Solms' stelt zich ten doel zich actief bezig te houden met het erfgoed van onze gemeenten met de bedoeling: onze kennis ervan te vergroten het waardevolle uit vroegere tijden te behouden en te beschermen de verzamelde gegevens vast te leggen voor het nageslacht. De Kring verzamelt informatie over velerlei onderwerpen uit de historie van Baarle, Castelre, Ulicoten en Zondereigen in de ruimste zin des woords. Heemkunde-Kring "Amalia van Solms" 'HEEM HUIS' Kerkstraat 4 2338 Baarle Hertog Bank: 10.38.94.969 Rabo-bank Baarle Nassau 418-1014691-23 Kredietbank Baarle Hertog Overname van artikelen of gedeelten ervan uit deze publicatie is slechts toegestaan na schriftelijke toestemming van de auteur/ redaktie. Nieuwsbrief Heemkunde-Kring "Amalia van Solms" Baarle Hertog-Nassau vcrschijnt 4x per jaar R.cdaktic: Fons Raeijmaekers Redaktieadrcs: "Heemhuis" 1CJ: 699624 Kerkstraat 4 2338 Baarle Hertog Sc jaargang no.1 februari 1990 Inhoud: 2 Ons Heemhuis Voorzitter A.Jacobs 3 Het onderwijs in Ulicoten (1) A.M.C.Zom 8 Kantklossen A.v. Eijl-v.d. Klashorst l3 30 jaar geleden F. Raeijmaekers 17 Ulicoten 1930 J.Geerts en E.Ragas 23 Kastelein F. Raeijmaekers 26 Arme Amalia! A. van Tuijl 28 1990, 900 jaar H.Bernardus A.Willemsen en E.Ragas 30 25 jaar jeugdcarnaval A. van Tuijl 31 Algemene Ledenvergadering Het bestuur 32 Beknopte geschiedenis Post Baarle Hertog E.Ragas 43 Nogmaals enquete Secretariaat 44 Lidmaatschap 1990 F. Racijmackcrs Let op! Algemene ledenvergadering 6 maart a.s. Lindeboom, 20.00 uur (zie pagina 31 !) 1 Ons Heemhuis Nu de opcningsdrukte en de eerste tentoonstellingen achter de rug zijn, komen we tot rust.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemeentelijk Mobiliteitsplan Baarle 2021
    GEMEENTELIJK MOBILITEITSPLAN BAARLE 2021 1 Inhoud 1. INLEIDING ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2. HET WEREN VAN VRACHTVERKEER DOOR DE DORPSKERN ................................................................ 5 3. DE GEVOLGEN VAN DE RANDWEG OP DE MOBILITEIT ....................................................................... 9 3.1 Tellingen voor de aanleg van de randweg ................................................................................... 10 3.2 Tellingen van ANPR – camera’s ................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Tellingen vrachtverkeer ............................................................................................................... 12 3.4 Beknopte analyse randweg Baarle door de provincie Noord-Brabant ....................................... 12 4. DE KEUZE VOOR ÉÉN- OF TWEERICHTINGSVERKEER IN HET CENTRUM EN OMGEVING .................. 15 5. DE MAXIMUMSNELHEDEN ................................................................................................................ 19 6. VASTSTELLEN NIEUWE KOMGRENZEN .............................................................................................. 23 7. OPENBAAR VERVOER ........................................................................................................................ 24 8. PARKEREN .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DISSENTING OPINION of JUDGE ARMAND-UGON [Translation] 1 Very Much Regret That, for the Reasons Set out Below, 1 Am Unable to Concur in the Judgment of the Court
    DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ARMAND-UGON [Translation] 1 very much regret that, for the reasons set out below, 1 am unable to concur in the Judgment of the Court. Enclaved within the territory of the commune of Baarle-Nassau (Netherlands), which extends over more than 4,000 hectares, is the commune of Baerle-Duc (Belgium), of an area of 200 hectares. In Section A, known as Zondereygen, of the commune of Baarle- Nassau, two plots shown in the survey and known, from 1836 to 1843, as numbers 91 and 92, are the subject of the present dispute and the Parties ask the Court to decide to which of the two this territory, of 14.378 hectares, belongs. The Belgian Government bases its claims to sovereignty in respect of these plots on the express provisions of the minute re- produced in Article 90 of the Descriptive Minute of the convention of 1843. This minute was drawn up in Dutch; the part relating to the plots is in the following terms : "The plots numbered 91 and 92 belong to the commune of Baerle-Duc" (De parceelen nummer 91 en 92 behoren tot de gemeente Baerle-Hertog) . The Dutch Government relies on two main propositions in assert- ing its sovereignty: the status quo laid down by the Treaty of 1842 and by the Convention of 1843, and, after that date, effective, notorious and peaceful~possessionof the plots. The Communal Minute of 1836-1841, of the commune of Baarle-Nassau, shows the two plots as belonging to that commune. Its text, which is in Dutch, is to the following effect : "Section A, known as Zondereygen : The plots numbers 78-111 inclusive belong to the Commune of Baarle Nassau" (De parceelen van en met nummer 78 tot en met no.
    [Show full text]
  • BAARLE-HERTOG RUP Baarle-Oost
    BAARLE-HERTOG RUP Baarle-Oost VERZOEK TOT RAADPLEGING – uitbreiding plangebied juni 2016 colofon opdrachtgever: gemeente Baarle-Hertog project: RUP Baarle-Oost fase: verzoek tot raadpleging – uitbreiding plangebied datum: juni 2016 opdrachthouder: Dienstverlenende Vereniging Intergemeentelijke Samenwerking IOK Antwerpseweg 1, 2440 Geel - www.iok.be projectteam: IOK plangroep projectcoördinator: Stijn Sneyers projectverantwoordelijke: Marijke Sannen / Johan Van Opstal ruimtelijke planning: Rhea Denissen, Greet De Ruysscher, Luk Helsen, Dirk Hey- len, Liselotte Raes, David Rombaut, Marijke Sannen, Stijn Sneyers, Danny Vaes, An Vandeplas, Johan Van Opstal CAD-GIS: Dirk Poelmans, Tanja Van Dooren, Anja Dello secretariaat: Annick Sprengers Inhoud 6.2 Rondweg ........................................................................................................ 24 INHOUD 6.3 Watertoets ...................................................................................................... 24 6.4 Bestemmingswijziging binnen HAG ................................................................ 24 DEEL 1 BESCHRIJVING VAN HET RUP................................................1 7 Visie en ontwerp ...................................................................................... 26 1 Situering en doelstelling ............................................................................. 3 7.1 Ruimtelijke visie voor het gebied .................................................................... 26 1.1 Doelstelling RUP .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sovereignty Over Certain Frontier Land: Belgium/ the Netherlands'
    SOVEREIGNTY OVER CERTAIN FRONTIER LAND: BELGIUM/ THE NETHERLANDS' ALTHouGH both parties had accepted the jurisdiction of the World Court ipso facto and without special agreement under article 36(2) of the Statute,' this case was laid before the Court by special agreement 4 between them,8 article i of which is as follows: The Court is requested to determine whether sovereignty over the plots shown in the survey and known from 1836 to 1843 as Nos. 91 and 92, Section A, Zondereygen, belongs to the Kingdom of Belgium or the Kingdom of the Netherlands. As the Court remarked,5 The frontier between the two States in the area where the two plots in dispute are situated presents certain unusual features. Whilst the frontier in general is a linear one, in the area north of the Belgian town of Turnhout there are a number of enclaves formed by the Belgian commune of Baerle- Duc and the Netherlands commune of Baarle-Nassau. The territory of the Belgian commune of Baerle-Duc is not continuous. It is made up of a series of plots of land, many of which are enclosed in the Netherlands commune of Baarle-Nassau. Various pieces of the commune of Baerle-Duc are not only isolated from the main territory of Belgium but also one from another. Neither is the territory of the commune of Baarle- Nassau continuous: that commune has enclaves within Belgium. The Court is informed that the origin of this situation is very ancient. In 1836, before the separation of Belgium and The Netherlands was sanctioned by the Treaty of London, 1839,6 an attempt was made by the burgomasters of the two communes to establish the exact boundaries between the two communes in order to secure an equi- table allocation of land tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Day To
    Abbeys & Beers: Cycling in Brabant (NL) and Flanders (B) - 7 dagen DUTCH BIKETOURS - EMAIL: [email protected] - TELEPHONE +31 (0)24 3244712 - WWW.DUTCH-BIKETOURS.COM Abbeys & Beers: Cycling in Brabant (NL) and Flanders (B) 7 days, € 580 Introduction Experience the taste of Trappist beers on this unique cycle route which takes you past four Trappist abbeys in Holland and Belgium. Trappist beer is not a type of beer. It is beer that is brewed by a Trappist order of catholic monks. Trappist abbeys are located in gorgeous pastoral countryside where connecting to the earth and to the divine almost comes naturally. Abbeys open their guest rooms to people in need of a short spiritual retreat. Passing cyclotourists, however, are not permitted to enter the abbeys or the breweries. Day to Day Day 1 Arrival in Turnhout (Flanders, Belgium) In the heart of the Kempen region lies Turnhout, also known as the city of playing cards. In 1826 the world’s first pack of cards to come off a printing press was manufactured here. Printing playing cards became a successful industry. The National Museum of Playing Cards can be found here in Turnhout. If you have time to explore, the Castle of the Dukes of Brabant is worth a visit, as is St. Peter’s Church. You will find accommodation right in the lively centre of town at Best Western Plus Turnhout City. Day 2 Turnhout – Antwerpen 70 km Your first stop of the day is in Merksplas. From 1822 to 1993 an agricultural labour colony for tramps and beggars was located here.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Enclaves
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive A Theory of Enclaves Vinokurov, Evgeny 2007 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20936/ MPRA Paper No. 20936, posted 28 Feb 2010 06:35 UTC 07-565_03_Ch02.qxd 11/29/07 6:27 AM Page 9 2 What Are Enclaves and Exclaves? DEFINITIONS AND CRITERIA The concept of enclaves as implicit phenomena exists in the history of hu- mankind from the earliest times. The Treaty of Madrid of 1526 is probably the first document explicitly containing the word “enclave.” The term “en- clave” entered the language of diplomacy rather late in English, in 1868, coming from French, the lingua franca of diplomacy, with a sense derived from the late Latin inclavatus meaning “shut in, locked up” and clavis mean- ing a “key.” The “exclave” is a logical extension created three decades later corresponding to the Latin exclavo. These words can now be found in most Indo-European languages—to give some examples: in German (Enklave, Exklave), in French, Spanish, and Italian (enclave, exclave), in Russian (??????, ??????? [anklav, exclav]), in Swedish (enclav, exclav), and many other languages. There is no specific term in Chinese to describe an enclave so the expression to be used is bèi ba–o wéi dì lıˇng tuˇor bèi ba–o wéi dì lıˇng tuˇ, meaning literally a “surrounded territory.” The term “enclave” is widely used. It is commonly used to recognize the existence of a fragment enclosed in something of an alien nature. The term is typically used in geology to connote the existence of a rock fragment. In fact, scrolling through scientific databases one will find many more papers on enclaves in geology rather than political enclaves.
    [Show full text]