DON-NAVY-2020-012169.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Collateral Duty Inspectors (Cdis): a Maintenance Officer’S Perspective
Collateral Duty Inspectors (CDIs): A Maintenance Officer’s Perspective By Cdr. Don Buzard ave you ever heard a second class petty officer we often allow second and first class petty officers to say, “I don’t feel comfortable becoming a CDI,” take longer, even years, to qualify as collateral duty Hor “I’ve only been in the community a year, so inspectors. How ironic. To better monitor progress I’m not ready yet.” Many other reasons exist for not will- toward achieving qualifications in a timely manner, I ingly accepting the additional responsibility of a more created realistic milestones for each work center and senior petty officer. After hearing such excuses, I often required division leadership to brief this progress twice a reminded the Sailor of these words written on their month (see the sample chart provided). frocking letter: “I willingly will accept In my last 10 years in aviation-maintenance activi- additional responsibility.” ties, I came to realize that most prospective CDI candi- After following years of direct- dates lack knowledge in aviation-maintenance programs. ing maintenance in several differ- The most glaring example of this problem was when I ent T/M/S squadrons, I saw a asked a first-class petty officer and prospective QAR common theme, which was to candidate what NAMP and NAMPSOP stood for. I qualify airmen as plane cap- received a blank stare. Needless to say, he went back tains in a six-to-nine-month to the work center. Every now and then, I ran across a period. I considered that very bright Sailor who new the majority of the programs time a reasonable wait- inside and out. -
Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress
Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Naval Affairs December 13, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RS22478 Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Summary Names for Navy ships traditionally have been chosen and announced by the Secretary of the Navy, under the direction of the President and in accordance with rules prescribed by Congress. Rules for giving certain types of names to certain types of Navy ships have evolved over time. There have been exceptions to the Navy’s ship-naming rules, particularly for the purpose of naming a ship for a person when the rule for that type of ship would have called for it to be named for something else. Some observers have perceived a breakdown in, or corruption of, the rules for naming Navy ships. On July 13, 2012, the Navy submitted to Congress a 73-page report on the Navy’s policies and practices for naming ships. For ship types now being procured for the Navy, or recently procured for the Navy, naming rules can be summarized as follows: The first Ohio replacement ballistic missile submarine (SBNX) has been named Columbia in honor of the District of Columbia, but the Navy has not stated what the naming rule for these ships will be. Virginia (SSN-774) class attack submarines are being named for states. Aircraft carriers are generally named for past U.S. Presidents. Of the past 14, 10 were named for past U.S. Presidents, and 2 for Members of Congress. Destroyers are being named for deceased members of the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, including Secretaries of the Navy. -
NISCOM Publication Espionage 1989
COMMENTS ................................... ........................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ... ... .... ........................................................ ... 2 SIGNIFICANT CASES ........ ...................................... ...............3 Michael Hahn Allen ...................................................................... 5 Stephen Anthony Baba ................................. ............................... 6 Robert Ernest Cordrey ..................................................................7 Nelson Cornelious Drummond ..................................................... 8 Wilfredo Garcia ............................................................................ 9 Stephen Dwayne Hawkins ...........................................................10 Brian Patrick Horton ....................................................................11 Clayton John Lonetree ................................................ ......... ...... 12 Samuel Lori ng Morison ............................................................. ..14 Jeffery Loring Pickerlng ......................................... .....................15 Jonathan Jay Pollard .................................................................. 16 Brian Everett Slavens .................................................................17 Michael Timothy Tobias .............................................................. 18 John Anthony Walker, Jr.... ............................................... ......... 19 Michael Lance Walker ............................................................... -
The Relationship Between Naval Aviation Mishaps and Squadron Maintenance Safety Climate
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2006-12 The relationship between naval aviation mishaps and squadron maintenance safety climate Brittingham, Cynthia J. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/2403 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NAVAL AVIATION MISHAPS AND SQUADRON MAINTENANCE SAFETY CLIMATE by Cynthia J. Brittingham December 2006 Co-Advisors: Janice Laurence David Annis Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2006 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS The Relationship Between Naval Aviation Mishaps and Squadron Maintenance Safety Climate 6. AUTHOR(S) Brittingham, Cynthia J. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. -
U.S. Navy Ships-Of-The-Line
U.S. Navy – Ships-of-the-line A Frigate vs A Ship-of-the-Line: What’s the difference? FRIGATE: A vessel of war which is: 1) “ship” rigged, i.e. – with at least three masts (fore, main, & mizzen) & each mast carries the horizontal yards from which the principle sails are set; 2) this “ship-rigged vessel of war” is a FRIGATE because it has one covered, principle gun deck – USS Constitution is therefore a FRIGATE by class (illus. left) SHIP-OF-THE-LINE: A vessel of war which is: 1) “ship” rigged (see above); 2) this “ship-rigged vessel of war” is a SHIP-OF-THE-LINE because it has two or more covered gun decks – HMS Victory is therefore a SHIP-OF-THE-LINE by class (illus. right) HMS Victory (1765); 100+ guns; 820 officers Constitution preparing to battle Guerriere, & crew; oldest commissioned warship in the M.F. Corne, 1812 – PEM Coll. world, permanently dry docked in England Pg. 1 NMM Coll. An Act, 2 January 1813 – for the construction of the U.S. Navy’s first Ships-of-the-line USS Independence was the first ship-of-the-line launched for the USN from the Boston (Charlestown) Navy Yard on 22 June 1814: While rated for 74-guns, Independence was armed with 87 guns when she was launched. USS Washington was launched at the Portsmouth Navy Yard, 1 October 1814 USS Pennsylvania – largest sailing warship built for the USN USS Pennsylvania – rated for 136 guns on three covered gun decks + guns on her upper (spar) deck – the largest sailing warship ever built. -
USS San Diego
USS San Diego On Wednesday morning the United State cruiser San Diego will be formally rechristened in San Diego’s harbor . No city on the California coast has been so signally honored by the government, and the fact that a modern war vessel with its hundreds of men will carry the name of San Diego to all parts of the United States and the world is worthy of a celebration. --San Diego Union, September 14, 1914. With a gala ceremony in San Diego harbor, the flagship cruiser of the Pacific fleet was christened with style. Thousands watched as the daughter of the mayor, six-year-old Miss Annie May O’Neall, undraped a canvas over the stern, revealing the name “SAN DIEGO.” Mayor Charles O’Neall proudly declared the day a city holiday. A barbecue honoring the ship’s sailors was held in Balboa Park and the officers and their ladies were treated to a grand ball at the U.S. Grant Hotel. The USS San Diego was the new name for a heavy armored cruiser that had been launched ten years earlier as the California. Built in San Francisco by the famed Union Iron Works, the ship was 505 feet in length, 70 feet in width, and displaced 13,600 tons. Coal-fired steam engines turned two eighteen-foot diameter propellers and powered the ship to a top speed of 22 knots. The cruiser was a Pennsylvania-class ship, one of the most potent warships in the world. Its armament included four eight-inch guns, 14 six-inch guns, and an assortment of rapid fire weapons and torpedo tubes. -
EB News May 2003
MAY 2003 First Group Model is presented to Jimmy Carter Completes Degree In Ship Systems Technology Castine, Maine ith pomp and circum- stance, 18 MDA-UAW Wmembers marked a significant achievement in their lives as they accepted associate's degrees in ship systems design technology from Maine Maritime Academy (MMA). The 18 men and women are the first graduates of Electric Boat’s associate’s degree program, which began in 1999. Under this program, graduates of EB’s five-year design continued on page 8 Patternmaker David Keith (300), INSIDE who built the Jimmy Carter The President’s Corner • 2 (SSN-23) model for the former John Holmander Receives GD president, said it was an honor to Technical Excellence Award • 3 do so. “It was good being able to Earned Hours • 3 make something for his museum,” Keith said. “It’s something people The EB Dive Team – will see forever.” Jacks Of All Trades • 4 Employees Put Automated Milling Above, former President Jimmy Carter admires a Machine To New Uses • 5 scale model of the USS Jimmy Carter (SSN-23) at U.S. Navy Awards General the presentation of the model to the Jimmy Carter Dynamics $24M Contract • 6 Library and Museum in Atlanta on May 15. EBMA Awards $14,500 In College Presenting the model to Carter was Mike Toner, Scholarships • 7 above right, executive vice president of General Lend A Hand At United Way’s Day Dynamics and the president of Electric Boat. Of Caring • 9 Describing the model to Carter is Pete Halvordson, Retirees • 9 Seawolf Class program manager. -
THE JERSEYMAN 9 Years - Nr
Looking back... 1st Quarter 2011 "Rest well, yet sleep lightly and hear the call, if again sounded, to provide firepower for freedom…” THE JERSEYMAN 9 Years - Nr. 69 File Number: 225949 HOLD FOR RELEASE UNTIL (9 AM-ZWT) JULY 21, 1946 THE USS NEW JERSEY MOST JAPS PREFER TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY For a year-and-a-half, the USS NEW JERSEY has been having pretty much her own way in the Pacific. One op- eration after another, beginning with the Marshalls and running straight through the first air strikes on Tokyo, the big battleship has gone about the business of leveling Jap shore instal- lations and protecting carrier forces in the proverbial "one hand tied be- hind the back" fashion. Attacking Jap planes take one look at the dread- nought's gun-studded decks. That's usually enough. The one-time fast carrier task force flagship is potential enemy destruction, and no one is more aware of it than the Japs. Admiral Raymond Spruance, Fifth Fleet Commander, talks with Captain Photo courtesy of C.F. Holden, USN, of 11 Parkview Ave- John A. Altfeltis, SMC, USN/Ret. nue, Bangor, Maine, aboard the USS USS New Jersey, OS Division 1968-1969 NEW JERSEY. Edgewater, Colorado 2 The Jerseyman Looking Back… August 1, 1945 (Ship’s Archives) During the 1968/1969 Vietnam tour of USS New Jersey, crewman Bob Foster found this unsigned poem stuffed inside a crack between a shelf and the wall of his locker in “M” Division. Dated August 1, 1945, he found the poem during a review of his navy souvenirs and donated it to the ship’s archives. -
Marine Nuclear Power 1939 – 2018 Part 1 Introduction
Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 1: Introduction Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 1: Introduction. The other parts are: Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications. -
United States Navy (USN) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Request Logs, 2009-2017
Description of document: United States Navy (USN) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) request logs, 2009-2017 Requested date: 12-July-2017 Release date: 12-October-2017 Posted date: 03-February-2020 Source of document: Department of the Navy - Office of the Chief of Naval Operations FOIA/Privacy Act Program Office/Service Center ATTN: DNS 36 2000 Navy Pentagon Washington DC 20350-2000 Email:: [email protected] The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site, and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 5720 Ser DNS-36RH/17U105357 October 12, 2017 Sent via email to= This is reference to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated July 12, 2017. -
Wilfred Sykes Education Corporation
Number 302 • summer 2017 PowerT HE M AGAZINE OF E NGINE -P OWERED V ESSELS FRO M T HEShips S T EA M SHI P H IS T ORICAL S OCIE T Y OF A M ERICA ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Messageries Maritimes’ three musketeers 8 Sailing British India An American Classic: to the Persian steamer Gulf 16 Post-war American WILFRED Freighters 28 End of an Era 50 SYKES 36 Thanks to All Who Continue to Support SSHSA July 2016-July 2017 Fleet Admiral – $50,000+ Admiral – $25,000+ Maritime Heritage Grant Program The Dibner Charitable The Family of Helen & Henry Posner, Jr. Trust of Massachusetts The Estate of Mr. Donald Stoltenberg Ambassador – $10,000+ Benefactor ($5,000+) Mr. Thomas C. Ragan Mr. Richard Rabbett Leader ($1,000+) Mr. Douglas Bryan Mr. Don Leavitt Mr. and Mrs. James Shuttleworth CAPT John Cox Mr. H.F. Lenfest Mr. Donn Spear Amica Companies Foundation Mr. Barry Eager Mr. Ralph McCrea Mr. Andy Tyska Mr. Charles Andrews J. Aron Charitable Foundation CAPT and Mrs. James McNamara Mr. Joseph White Mr. Jason Arabian Mr. and Mrs. Christopher Kolb CAPT and Mrs. Roland Parent Mr. Peregrine White Mr. James Berwind Mr. Nicholas Langhart CAPT Dave Pickering Exxon Mobil Foundation CAPT Leif Lindstrom Peabody Essex Museum Sponsor ($250+) Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Ferguson Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey Lockhart Mr. Henry Posner III Mr. Ronald Amos Mr. Henry Fuller Jr. Mr. Jeff MacKlin Mr. Dwight Quella Mr. Daniel Blanchard Mr. Walter Giger Jr. Mr. and Mrs. Jack Madden Council of American Maritime Museums Mrs. Kathleen Brekenfeld Mr. -
Investigation of Abandoned WW II Wrecks in Palau
Investigation of Abandoned WW II Wrecks in Palau Tomo Ishimura1 Abstract Over forty Japanese vessels were sunken in the water of Palau during WWII. Some wrecks sunk in the shallow water at a depth of 20 meters or less and were salvaged. Other wrecks at 30 meters depth or more still remain and are legally protected by the authority of Palau Government but are seriously threatened by illegal treasure hunters. Initial efforts to identify human remains of Japanese soldiers were made in 2005. As part of an archaeology advisory team for the Japanese Government I carried out underwater surveys of sunken WWII vessels in Palau. In 2010 and 2011, I conducted investigations of the WWII vessels again, together with on-shore research on sites and features associated with the Japanese occupation period, funded by the Takanashi Foundation for Arts and Archaeology (Japan). The research revealed that the most of the vessels sunken in Palau were not genuine military vessels of Japanese Imperial Navy or Army but converted vessels originally built for non-combat purposes. These vessels were slow in speed and not well-equipped for combat activity. Most of them were destroyed by American aerial bombing on March 30th 1944. The evening before (March 29th) the main force of the Japanese Combined Fleet, including its flagship Musashi, retreated from Palau. It is clear that the vessels left in Palau were abandoned as a “third wheel” of the Combined Fleet. These abandoned-converted vessels include cargo carriers, tankers, whaling boats and fishing boats. This implies that Japanese troops were experiencing a difficult and desperate campaign at that time.