Outline of Applied Science
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Social Sciences—How Scientific Are They?
31 The Social Sciences—How Scientifi c Are They? Manas Sarma or Madame Curie. That is, he social sciences are a very important and amazing in their own way. fi eld of study. A division of science, social sciences Tembrace a wide variety of topics from anthropology A better example of a social to sociology. The social sciences cover a wide range of science than law may be topics that are crucial for understanding human experience/ economics. economics behavior in groups or as individuals. is, in a word, fi nances. Economics is the study By defi nition, social science is the branch of science that deals of how money changes, the rate at which it changes, and with the human facets of the natural world (the other two how it potentially could change and the rate at which it branches of science are natural science and formal science). would. Even though economics does not deal with science Some social sciences are law, economics, and psychology, to directly, it is defi nitely equally scientifi c. About 50-60% of name a few. The social sciences have existed since the time colleges require calculus to study business or economics. of the ancient Greeks, and have evolved ever since. Over Calculus is also required in some science fi elds, like physics time, social sciences have grown and gained a big following. or chemistry. Since economics and science both require Some colleges, like Yale University, have chosen to focus calculus, economics is still a science. more on the social sciences than other subjects. The social sciences are more based on qualitative data and not as Perhaps the most scientifi c of the social sciences is black-and-white as the other sciences, so even though they psychology. -
BRONZE AGE FORMAL SCIENCE? with Additional Remarks on the Historiography of Distant Mathematics
ROSKILDE UNIVERSITETSCENTER ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY Faggruppen for filosofi og Section for philosophy videnskabsteori and science studies BRONZE AGE FORMAL SCIENCE? With additional remarks on the historiography of distant mathematics JENS HØYRUP FILOSOFI OG VIDENSKABSTEORI PÅ ROSKILDE UNIVERSITETSCENTER 3. Række: Preprints og reprints 2003 Nr. 5 In memoriam Robert Merton 1910–2003 Revised contribution to Foundations of the Formal Sciences IV The History of the Concept of the Formal Sciences Bonn, February 14-17, 2003 I. Past understandings of mathematics .......................... 1 Aristotle and others ............................................ 2 Scribal cultures I: Middle Kingdom Egypt ........................... 4 Scribal cultures II: Old Babylonian epoch ............................ 6 Riddle collections – and a hypothesis ............................... 15 II. Understandings of past mathematics ......................... 16 Second (didactical) thoughts ...................................... 18 Bibliography .............................................. 20 The paper was prepared during a stay at the Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte,Berlin. I use the opportunity to express my sincere gratitude for the hospitality I received. Referee: Aksel Haaning My talk falls in two unequally long parts, each turning around a particular permutation of the same three key words:* – The first, longer and main part treats of past understandings of mathematics. – The second, shorter part takes up understandings of past mathematics. In both parts, -
Outline of Science
Outline of science The following outline is provided as a topical overview of • Empirical method – science: • Experimental method – The steps involved in order Science – systematic effort of acquiring knowledge— to produce a reliable and logical conclusion include: through observation and experimentation coupled with logic and reasoning to find out what can be proved or 1. Asking a question about a natural phenomenon not proved—and the knowledge thus acquired. The word 2. Making observations of the phenomenon “science” comes from the Latin word “scientia” mean- 3. Forming a hypothesis – proposed explanation ing knowledge. A practitioner of science is called a for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a "scientist". Modern science respects objective logical rea- scientific hypothesis, the scientific method re- soning, and follows a set of core procedures or rules in or- quires that one can test it. Scientists generally der to determine the nature and underlying natural laws of base scientific hypotheses on previous obser- the universe and everything in it. Some scientists do not vations that cannot satisfactorily be explained know of the rules themselves, but follow them through with the available scientific theories. research policies. These procedures are known as the 4. Predicting a logical consequence of the hy- scientific method. pothesis 5. Testing the hypothesis through an experiment – methodical procedure carried out with the 1 Essence of science goal of verifying, falsifying, or establishing the validity of a hypothesis. The 3 types of -
The 9Th Technology Presentation(PDF Format/3.8MB )
The 9th Technology Presentation March 16, 2012 Table of Contents 1. Opening Remarks Hisashi Ietsugu, President and CEO 2. Strategy and Progress of R&D Mitsuru Watanabe, Member of Managing Board and Executive Officer, Head of R&D (1) Outline of Technology Strategy Strategy for Realizing Personalized Medicine (Initiatives Involving Companion Diagnostics) (2) Launch Stage New Product Technologies 1) XN Series: Proposing Incomparable Laboratory Workflow 2) Silent Design ® 3) CS-5100: Flagship Model in the Hemostasis Field 4) Lab Assay: C2P 5) Progress of OSNA (3) Practical Stage Status of Progress on Development Themes 1) Cervical Cancer Screening 2) Glucose AUC (Minimally Invasive Body Fluid Extraction Technology) 3) Diabetes Bio-Simulation 4) Methylated DNA 3. Status of Progress at the Research Stage Kaoru Asano, Executive Officer, Executive Vice President (1) New Activity: Metabolome Analysis Technology 1) Early Detection of Diabetic Nephropathy (2) High-Performance Protein Recombination Technology 1) Sugar Chain Modification Technology (3) Approach toward e-Health 1) Genetic Diagnosis Support System Using Secret Sharing Scheme 1 2. Strategy and Progress of R&D Mitsuru Watanabe, Member of Managing Board and Executive Officer, Head of R&D 2. Strategy & Progress of R&D (1) Outline of Technology Strategy Strategy for Realizing Personalized Medicine (Initiatives Involving Companion Diagnostics) (2) Launch Stage New Product Technologies 1) XN Series: Proposing Incomparable Laboratory Workflow 2) Silent Design ® 3) CS-5100: Flagship Model in the Hemostasis Field 4) Lab Assay: C2P 5) Progress of OSNA (3) Practical Stage Status of Progress on Development Themes 1) Cervical Cancer Screening 2) Glucose AUC (Minimally Invasive Body Fluid Extraction Technology) 3) Diabetes Simulation 4) Methylated DNA 3 2. -
Recommendations from the Academic Futures Working Group On
Recommendations from the Academic Futures Working Group on Interdisciplinary Education, Research and Creative Works Released to campus October 1, 2019 University of Colorado Boulder Table of Contents I. Background and Philosophy B. Interdisciplinarity, the Public University, and Serving the Public Good C. Campus Perspectives on Interdisciplinarity II. Interdisciplinarity in Teaching and Research A. Bringing Interdisciplinarity Front and Center B. Creating the Continuum of Interdisciplinary Education C. Interdisciplinary Research and Scholarship: Building on our Existing Interdisciplinary Strengths III. Creating sustainability and taking on our challenges IV. Creating a Budgetary Model for Campus that Supports Interdisciplinarity V. Conclusion 1 University of Colorado Boulder Committee Members Jim White, Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences (Lead) Waleed Abdalati, Director, CIRES and Professor, Geography, College of Arts and Sciences Max Boykoff, Associate Professor, ENVS/CIRES; Director, Center for Science and Technology Policy Andrew Calabrese, Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Research, Professor of Media Studies, CMCI Margaret C. Campbell, Provost Professor of Marketing, Leeds School of Business Sharon Collinge, Professor, ENVS, College of Arts and Sciences Jackie Elliott, Associate Professor and Chair, Classics Oliver Gerland, Associate Professor, Theatre & Dance; Interim Director of the Humanities program Larry Levine, Associate Vice Chancellor for IT and CIO, Office of Information Technology Jana Milford, Professor, -
The State of Inclusive Science Communication: a Landscape Study
The State of Inclusive Science Communication: A Landscape Study Katherine Canfield and Sunshine Menezes Metcalf Institute, University of Rhode Island Graphics by Christine Liu This report was developed for the University of Rhode Island’s Metcalf Institute with generous support from The Kavli Foundation. Cite as: Canfield, K. & Menezes, S. 2020. The State of Inclusive Science Communication: A Landscape Study. Metcalf Institute, University of Rhode Island. Kingston, RI. 77 pp. Executive Summary Inclusive science communication (ISC) is a new and broad term that encompasses all efforts to engage specific audiences in conversations or activities about science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) topics, including, but not limited to, public engagement, informal science learning, journalism, and formal science education. Unlike other approaches toward science communication, however, ISC research and practice is grounded in inclusion, equity, and intersectionality, making these concerns central to the goals, design, implementation, evaluation, and refinement of science communication efforts. Together, the diverse suite of insights and practices that inform ISC comprise an emerging movement. While there is a growing recognition of the value and urgency of inclusive approaches, there is little documented knowledge about the potential catalysts and barriers for this work. Without documentation, synthesis, and critical reflection, the movement cannot proceed as quickly as is warranted. The University of Rhode Island’s Metcalf -
How Science Works
PB 1 How science works The Scientific Method is traditionally presented in the first chapter of science text- books as a simple recipe for performing scientific investigations. Though many use- ful points are embodied in this method, it can easily be misinterpreted as linear and “cookbook”: pull a problem off the shelf, throw in an observation, mix in a few ques- tions, sprinkle on a hypothesis, put the whole mixture into a 350° experiment—and voila, 50 minutes later you’ll be pulling a conclusion out of the oven! That might work if science were like Hamburger Helper®, but science is complex and cannot be re- duced to a single, prepackaged recipe. The linear, stepwise representation of the process of science is simplified, but it does get at least one thing right. It captures the core logic of science: testing ideas with evidence. However, this version of the scientific method is so simplified and rigid that it fails to accurately portray how real science works. It more accurately describes how science is summarized after the fact—in textbooks and journal articles—than how sci- ence is actually done. The simplified, linear scientific method implies that scientific studies follow an unvarying, linear recipe. But in reality, in their work, scientists engage in many different activities in many different sequences. Scientific investigations often involve repeating the same steps many times to account for new information and ideas. The simplified, linear scientific method implies that science is done by individual scientists working through these steps in isolation. But in reality, science depends on interactions within the scientific community. -
Sellars in Context: an Analysis of Wilfrid Sellars's Early Works Peter Jackson Olen University of South Florida, [email protected]
University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Sellars in Context: An Analysis of Wilfrid Sellars's Early Works Peter Jackson Olen University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Scholar Commons Citation Olen, Peter Jackson, "Sellars in Context: An Analysis of Wilfrid Sellars's Early Works" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4191 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sellars in Context: An Analysis of Wilfrid Sellars’s Early Works by Peter Olen A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Stephen Turner, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Richard Manning, Ph.D. Rebecca Kukla, Ph.D. Alexander Levine, Ph.D. Willem deVries, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 20th, 2012 Keywords: Logical Positivism, History of Analytic Philosophy Copyright © 2012, Peter Olen DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to the faculty members and fellow graduate students who helped me along the way. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank Rebecca Kukla, Richard Manning, Stephen Turner, Willem deVries, Alex Levine, Roger Ariew, Eric Winsberg, Charles Guigon, Nancy Stanlick, Michael Strawser, and the myriad of faculty members who were instrumental in getting me to this point. -
Foundations of Nursing Science 9781284041347 CH01.Indd Page 2 10/23/13 10:44 AM Ff-446 /207/JB00090/Work/Indd
9781284041347_CH01.indd Page 1 10/23/13 10:44 AM ff-446 /207/JB00090/work/indd © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION PART 1 Foundations of Nursing Science 9781284041347_CH01.indd Page 2 10/23/13 10:44 AM ff-446 /207/JB00090/work/indd © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION 9781284041347_CH01.indd Page 3 10/23/13 10:44 AM ff-446 /207/JB00090/work/indd © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION CHAPTER Philosophy of Science: An Introduction 1 E. Carol Polifroni Introduction A philosophy of science is a perspective—a lens, a way one views the world, and, in the case of advanced practice nurses, the viewpoint the nurse acts from in every encounter with a patient, family, or group. A person’s philosophy of science cre- ates the frame on a picture—a message that becomes a paradigm and a point of reference. Each individual’s philosophy of science will permit some things to be seen and cause others to be blocked. It allows people to be open to some thoughts and potentially keeps them closed to others. A philosophy will deem some ideas correct, others inconsistent, and some simply wrong. While philosophy of sci- ence is not meant to be viewed as a black or white proposition, it does provide perspectives that include some ideas and thoughts and, therefore, it must neces- sarily exclude others. The important key is to ensure that the ideas and thoughts within a given philosophy remain consistent with one another, rather than being in opposition. -
Cool Earth-Innovative Energy Technology Program
The Institute of Applied Energy June/2008 Published Version Cool Earth-Innovative Energy Technology Program March 2008 Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry “Cool Earth-Innovative Energy Technology Program” Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Innovative Energy technologies to be prioritized (1) Criteria for narrowing down the focus of innovative energy technology development (2) Identified “21” innovative energy technologies (3) Innovative energy technology development roadmap through 2050 3. Promotion of international cooperation in innovative energy technology development (1) Current status of energy technology development in the world and the situation of technology roadmap development (2) Basic view on international cooperation (3) Current status of international cooperation in the field of energy and future directions 4. Picture of a future social system in 2050 seen from the aspects of energy technology 5. Steady implementation of the program (Appendix) Technology Development Roadmap for Cool Earth-Innovative Energy Technology 1. Introduction The Prime Minister’s initiative on global warming, “Cool Earth 50” was announced on May 24, 2007. It includes the proposal for a long-term objective to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by half compared to the current level by 2050. It is difficult to address such a long-term objective with only conventional technologies, and so the development of innovative technologies is considered essential. At the Heiligendamm Summit in June 2007, climate change was one of the main discussion themes, and G8 leaders reached an agreement to “consider seriously the decision which includes at least a halving of global emissions by 2050” and to treat technology as “a key to mastering climate change and enhancing energy security.” Since Japan has the world’s top level technology in the field of energy, we need to strongly promote international cooperation and actively contribute to substantial global emissions reductions while reinforcing and maintaining our competitiveness. -
The Impact of Technological Change on Manpower and Skill Demand: Case-Study Data and Policy Implications. INSTITUTION California Univ., Berkeley
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 053 260 VT 010 815 AUTHOR Crossman, Edward R.F. W.; Laner, Stephen TITLE The Impact of Technological Change on Manpower and Skill Demand: Case-Study Data and Policy Implications. INSTITUTION California Univ., Berkeley. Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research. SPONS AGENCY Manpower Administration (DOL), Washington, D.C. Office of Manpower Research. PUB DATE Feb 69 NOTE 382p. EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC-$13.16 DESCRIPTORS Bibliographies, Case Studies, Charts, Critical Incidents Method, Economic Research, *Labor Economics, *Manpower Needs9 Measurement Techniques, *Profile Evaluation, Semiskilled Workers, *Skill Analysis, Skilled Workers, Tables (Data), *Technological Advancement, Unskilled Workers IDENTIFIERS *Skill Profile ABSTRACT To prove or disprove the hypothesis that automation and technological change impose increased skill demands on manufacturing and service industries, case studies were made of a bank and a steel and air products company, and of two oil companies, airlines, and electric power companies. The basic conceptual tool used to measure skill demands was the skill profile, a study of the distribution of total manhours required to produce a unit product (or service) along a scale of the Least to the most highly skilled labor. The study found that there was little or no net overall tendency for the mean skill level of the workforce to increase with technological change. Small changes in mean skill were largely offset by larger overall productivity increases, and thus, decreases in absolute demand measured in manhours per unit of production for specific skill brackets were more prevalent than increases. Declines in absolute labor demand were greatest for semiskilled workers and the next greatest declines were for laborers. -
Implications for Formal Science Learning Anila Asghar, Mcgill University
Informal Science Contexts: Implications for Formal Science Learning Anila Asghar, McGill University ABSTRACT This article illuminates the affordances of informal science learning to promote scien- tific literacy. It also discusses the ways in which informal learning environments can be creatively employed to enhance science instruction in K-12 as well as university settings. Also offered are various theoretical perspectives that serve as useful analyti- cal tools to understand science learning in formal as well as informal settings. “Children throughout the world, if we are to survive as a planet, will need to have a deep level of scientific literacy.” (Chiu & Duit, 2011, p. 553) romoting a wider public understanding and appreciation of science is an overarching goal of science literacy as underscored in science education policy and curriculum benchmarks (CMEC, 1997; AAAS, 1989; NRC, 1996). PKey goals of scientific literacy encompass: (a) developing a deeper understanding of science concepts; (b) developing scientific reasoning to understand the natural and designed phenomena; (c) understanding scientific research and findings, (d) rec- ognizing scientific ideas and issues underlying socio-scientific issues; (e) formulating scientifically informed views and stances on issues of local and global importance; (e) critically evaluating scientific information from various sources; (f) participating in debates and actions around critical social, economic, scientific, and environmental issues; and (g) pursuing careers in science, engineering, and technology (AAAS, 1993; CMEC, 1997). Contemporary science education reform efforts thus aim to develop scientifically literate citizens who can meaningfully contribute to socio-scientific dis- courses and engage in social and political action around them. A deeper and critical LEARNing Landscapes | Vol.