DOCSLIB.ORG

National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations—2010.­ Proc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations—2010.­ Proc United States Department of Agriculture National Proceedings: Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Conservation Research Station Proceedings RMRS-P-65 Nursery Associations—2010 December 2011 Riley LE, Haase DL, Pinto JR, tech. coords. 2011. National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations—2010. Proc. RMRS-P-65. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.183 p. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p065.html. Abstract These proceedings are a compilation of 25 papers that were presented at the regional meetings of the forest and conservation nursery associations and the Intertribal Nursery Council meeting in the United States in 2010. The Joint Meeting of the Southern Forest Nursery Association and Northeastern Forest and Conservation Nursery Association was held at the Peabody Hotel in Little Rock, Arkansas on July 26 to 29, 2010. Subject matter for the technical sessions included marketing strategies, tree improvement pro- grams, nursery certification, fumigation updates, and insect and disease management. Field trips included afternoon tours of the ArborGen Nursery in Bluff City, AR, Baucum Nursery in North Little Rock, AR, and the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff Small Farm Outreach Lonoke Site. The Joint Meeting of the Western Forest and Conservation Nursery Association and Forest Nursery Association of British Columbia: Target Seedling Symposium—2010 was held at the Sheraton Portland Airport Hotel in Portland, OR, on August 24 to 26, 2010. Subject matter for the technical sessions included the target seedling, seed handling, seedling nutrition, seedling culturing, pest management, nursery research and new technology, and general nursery topics. Afternoon field trips included tours of Blooming Nursery in Cornelius, OR, PRT container nursery in Hubbard, OR, and IFA bareroot nursery in Canby, OR. The Intertribal Nursery Council Meeting was held at the Medallion Hotel in Arlington, WA, on September 21 to 23, 2010. The meeting was hosted by the BankSavers Nursery, owned by the Stillaguamish Tribe, in Arlington. Subject matter for the technical sessions included native plant production for fisheries restoration, the use of small native plant nurseries in cultural and conservation education, energy conservation and alternative energy sources in nurseries, and the effects of climate change on nursery production. A short workshop on native plant nursery fertilization was also given. Afternoon field trips included tours of the BankSavers Nursery and Buffalo farm, a tour of Pilchuck Park Wetland Mitigation project, and a tour of the Stillaguamish Tribal Fish Hatchery. Keywords: bareroot nursery, container nursery, nursery practices, fertilization, pesticides, seeds, reforestation, restoration, tree physiology, hardwood species, native species Papers were edited to a uniform style; however, authors are responsible for content and accuracy. You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media. Please specify the publication title and number. Publishing Services Telephone (970) 498-1392 FAX (970) 498-1122 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.fs.fed.us/rmrs Mailing Address Publications Distribution Rocky Mountain Research Station 240 West Prospect Road Fort Collins, CO 80526 Cover: Ponderosa pine drawing by Lorraine Ashland, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho. The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement of any product or service by any of the organizations represented here. Pesticide Precautionary Statement This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations—2010 Technical Coordinators Lee E Riley is Horticulturist/Restoration Specialist, USDA Forest Service, Dorena Genetics Resource Center, 34963 Shoreview Road, Cottage Grove, OR 97424; Tel: 541.767.5723; E-mail: [email protected] Diane L Haase is Western Nursery Specialist, USDA Forest Service, PO Box 3623, Portland, OR 97208; Tel: 503.808.2349; E-mail: dlhaase@ fs.fed.us Jeremiah R Pinto is Research Plant Physiologist, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 1221 South Main Street, Moscow, ID 83843; Tel: 208.883.2352; E-mail: [email protected] Acknowledgments Funding for this publication was provided as a technology transfer service by the USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry through the National Reforestation, Nurseries, and Genetic Resources (RNGR) Program. The compilers thank Lane Eskew, Loa Collins, Nancy Chadwick, and Richard Schneider for their assistance in the preparation, printing, and distribution of this publication. Searchable Internet Database—www.rngr.net The National Nursery Proceedings database includes papers published in the regional nursery proceedings (Western, Intermountain, Northeastern, and Southern) since 1949. The database can be searched by date, author, or keyword and papers are available in portable document format (PDF). Table of Contents Joint Meeting of the Southern Forest Nursery Association, and Northeastern Forest and Conservation Nursery Association, Little Rock, Arkansas, July 26 to 29, 2010 .................................................1 Overview of Forestry in Arkansas John Shannon** Forests and Forestry in Arkansas During the Last Two Centuries .............................................................................3 Don C Bragg Forest Landowner Survey Brett Butler** Weyerhaeuser in Arkansas .......................................................................................................................................10 John Hearnsberger Panel Discussion: Marketing Hardwoods at the George O White State Forest Nursery ..........................................12 Greg Hoss Who Pays for Tree Improvement? ............................................................................................................................14 Tom D Byram and EM Raley Nursery Certification Robert P Karrfalt** Shortleaf Pine Production Scott Huff** Historical Forest Seedling Production in the Southern United States: 2008 to 2009 Planting Season ....................19 Scott A Enebak What’s New with Nurseries and Reforestation Projects at the Missoula Technology and Development Center? .... 35 Bob Simonson Update on Soil Fumigation: MBr Alternatives and Reregistration Decisions ............................................................40 Scott A Enebak Natural Resources Conservation Service Update and How it Works George Rheinhardt** How the Arkansas Forestry Commission Supports Baucum Nursery Doug Akin** Rehabilitating Afghanistan’s Natural Resources .......................................................................................................46 George Hernández The Use of Proline® (Prothioconazole) to Control Pitch Canker, Rhizoctonia Foliage Blight, and Fusiform Rust in Forest Seedling Nurseries and Efforts to Acquire Registration .................................................49 Tom E Starkey and Scott A Enebak Joint Meeting of the Western Forest and Conservation Nursery Association and Forest Nursery Associa- tion of British Columbia, Target Seedling Symposium, Portland, Oregon, August 24 to 26, 2010 ................. 59 The Target Plant Concept—A History and Brief Overview .......................................................................................61 Thomas D Landis Producing the Target Seed: Seed Collection, Treatment, and Storage ....................................................................67 Robert P Karrfalt Morphology Targets: What Do Seedling Morphological Attributes Tell Us? ..............................................................74 Jeremiah R Pinto Seedling Root Targets ..............................................................................................................................................80 Diane L Haase Repetitive Reaction and Restitution (R3) Induction of Drought Hardiness in Conifer Container Seedlings .............. 83 Jol Hodgson Seedling Mineral Nutrition, the Root of the Matter....................................................................................................87 Barbara J Hawkins The Role of Plant Water Relations in Achieving and Maintaining the Target Seedling .............................................98 John G Mexal and Nabil Khadduri Assimilation and Use of Carbon: Opportunities and Challenges for Nursery Seedling Culture Kent G Apostol** Provenance Variability in Nursery Growth of Subalpine Fir .................................................................................... 110 Charlie Cartwright and Cheng Ying Targeting Hardwoods.............................................................................................................................................. 115 Douglass F Jacobs Seedling Phenology and Cold Hardiness: Moving Targets .....................................................................................121
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations 2004
    United States Department of Agriculture National Proceedings: Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Conservation Research Station Proceedings Nursery Associations 2004 RMRS-P-35 August 2005 Abstract Dumroese, R. K.; Riley, L. E.; Landis, T. D., tech. coords. 2005. National proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations—2004; 2004 July 12–15; Charleston, NC; and 2004 July 26–29; Medford, OR. Proc. RMRS-P-35. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 142 p. This proceedings is a compilation of 30 papers that were presented at the regional meetings of the Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations in the United States in 2004. The joint meeting of the Southern Forest Nursery Association and the Northeastern Forest and Conservation Nursery Association occurred July 12 to 15 at the Embassy Suites Hotel in Charleston, South Carolina. The meeting was hosted by the South Carolina Forestry Commission, Taylor Nursery. In addition to technical sessions, tours of the Baucom Containerized Nursery and Mead/Westvaco Nursery were included. The Western Forest and Conservation Nursery Association meeting was held at the Red Lion Inn in Medford, Oregon, July 26 to 29. The meeting was hosted by the USDA Forest Service, J Herbert Stone Nursery. Morning technical sessions were followed by field trips to the J Herbert Stone Nursery and to restoration outplantings on the Timbered Rock Fire of 2002 in southern Oregon. Subject matter for both sessions included nursery history, conifer and hardwood nursery culturing, greenhouse management, fertilization, pest manage- ment, restoration, and native species propagation. Keywords: bareroot nursery, container nursery, nursery practices, fertilization, pesticides, seeds, reforestation, restoration, plant propagation, native plants, tree physiology, hardwood species Note: Papers were edited to a uniform style; however, authors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscaping with Native Plants by Stephen L
    SHORT-SEASON, HIGH-ALTITUDE GARDENING BULLETIN 862 Landscaping with native plants by Stephen L. Love, Kathy Noble, Jo Ann Robbins, Bob Wilson, and Tony McCammon INTRODUCTION There are many reasons to consider a native plant landscape in Idaho’s short- season, high-altitude regions, including water savings, decreased mainte- nance, healthy and adapted plants, and a desire to create a local theme CONTENTS around your home. Most plants sold for landscaping are native to the eastern Introduction . 1 United States and the moist climates of Europe. They require acid soils, con- The concept of native . 3 stant moisture, and humid air to survive and remain attractive. Most also Landscaping Principles for Native Plant Gardens . 3 require a longer growing season than we have available in the harshest cli- Establishing Native Landscapes and Gardens . 4 mates of Idaho. Choosing to landscape with these unadapted plants means Designing a Dry High-Desert Landscape . 5 Designing a Modified High-Desert Landscape . 6 accepting the work and problems of constantly recreating a suitable artificial Designing a High-Elevation Mountain Landscape . 6 environment. Native plants will help create a landscape that is more “com- Designing a Northern Idaho Mountain/Valley fortable” in the climates and soils that surround us, and will reduce the Landscape . 8 resources necessary to maintain the landscape. Finding Sources of Native Plants . 21 The single major factor that influences Idaho’s short-season, high-altitude climates is limited summer moisture. Snow and rainfall are relatively abun- dant in the winter, but for 3 to 4 months beginning in June, we receive only a YOU ARE A SHORT-SEASON, few inches of rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Components of Sustainable Production Practices for Container Plant Nurseries
    Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 124:294–298. 2011. Components of Sustainable Production Practices for Container Plant Nurseries Alex Bolques*1, GAry Knox2, MAtthew ChAppell3, lindA lAndruM4, And edwin duKe5 1Florida AandM University/CESTA, Gadsden County Extension, 2140 W. Jefferson Street, Quincy, FL 32351-1905 2University of Florida/IFAS Department of Environmental Horticulture, North Florida Research and Education Center, 155 Research Road, Quincy, FL 32351 3University of Georgia, Horticulture Department, 211 Hoke Smith Building, Athens, GA 30630 4University of Florida/IFAS/NFREC-Live Oak, 7580 Co Rd 136, Live Oak, FL 32060 5Florida AandM University, College of Engineering Sciences, Technology and Agriculture, Tallahassee, FL 32307 AdditionAl index words. container plants, green industries, nursery production, integrated pest management Sustainable production practices in container plant nursery operations are methods developed to conserve or reduce natural resources needed to produce a crop. These include production practices aimed at reducing the levels of chemical fertilizers and pesticides; managing insects, diseases and weeds by utilizing an integrated pest management approach; reducing, reusing or recycling materials and supplies; increasing production efficiency; and using conservation prac- tices aimed at reducing water consumption, managing runoff and controlling erosion. A listing of sustainable nursery production practices derived from literature review and selective nursery operation site visits in Florida and Georgia are provided. Introduction uncertainty or inexactness of meaning in the term’s definition (Gold and Gates, 2007). To this end, specific industries, includ- A survey of nursery and greenhouse plant growers found “go- ing segments of the green industry, have developed definitions ing green” and “minimal or no negative impact on the environ- for sustainable production.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations
    Forests and Forestry in Arkansas During the Last Two Centuries Don C Bragg Don C Bragg is Research Forester, USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, PO Box 3516 UAM, Monticello, AR 71656; Tel: 870.367.3464; E-mail [email protected] Bragg DC. 2011. Forests and forestry in Arkansas during the last two centuries. In: Riley LE, Haase DL, Pinto JR, technical coordinators. National Proceedings: Forest and Con- servation Nursery Associations—2010. Proc. RMRS-P-65. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 3-9. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/ rmrs_p065.html Abstract: Arkansas has had a long and storied history related to its forests and forestry. Ever since its acquisition in the Louisiana Purchase, timber has played a large role in the socioeconomic development of this state. In the 1880s, it was estimated that Arkansas had about 13 million ha (32 million ac) of forests and several hundred billion board feet of tim- ber, numbers that fell dramatically as commercial lumbering spread across the state. After reaching historic lows in forest coverage and volume around the end of World War II, better conservation measures and the widespread implementation of sustainable forestry and fire suppression has allowed for some recovery of forested cover (now stabilized at about 7.3 million ha [18 million ac]) and a steady increase in timber volume (currently estimated at over 0.8 billion m3 [27 billion ft3]). Over one-third of the timber volume in Arkansas is pine (Pinus spp.), a number that is expected to increase as pine plantations continue to replace natural-origin pine and pine-hardwood stands.
    [Show full text]
  • BTN Edible Native Landscaping
    Think Globally, Plant Locally Eat Native You are HERE Back to Natives RESTORATION "Connecting the community to habitat restoration through service learning and native plant education." Achievements in Landscape Design: Back to Natives designs California native landscapes for homeowners and businesses throughout Orange and Los Angeles Counties. Chief landscape designer for the “Costa Mesa Green Home,” which is certified ‘Platinum’ by the US Green Building Council’s (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) for Homes Program. Provided the landscape design for “Project 319,” one of the first homes in Orange County to earn the Build It Green, GreenPoint Rated designation. Achievements in Landscape Design: Back to Natives designs California native landscapes for homeowners and businesses throughout Orange and Los Angeles Counties. Guest designer at both the Los Angeles Garden Show at the LA Arboretum …and the Southern California Spring Garden Show at South Coast Plaza. Achievements in Landscape Design: Back to Natives designs California native landscapes for homeowners and businesses throughout Orange and Los Angeles Counties. Featured in the California Native Plant Society Garden Tour in 2011, 2012 and 2013. Achievements in Landscape Design: Back to Natives designs California native landscapes for homeowners and businesses throughout Orange and Los Angeles Counties. Designed Maple/Occidental Park for the City of Santa Ana. Back up a second! What does “native” mean? “Natives” were here prior to European contact. “Natives” evolved here over a very long period, and form a complex network of relationships. “Natives” are adapted to our climate and geography. Non-natives But they’re so pretty, what harm can they do? Diseases or weather conditions 42% of the nation's endangered and which kept the plants in check threatened species have declined as a in their homeland are absent result of encroaching exotic plants and animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Procurement and Production Manual a Systems Approach for the Production of Healthy Nursery Stock
    Safe Procurement and Production Manual A Systems Approach for the Production of Healthy Nursery Stock By John A. Griesbach, Jennifer L. Parke, Gary A. Chastagner, Niklaus J. Grünwald and John Aguirre Revised January 2012 What is the ‘systems approach’ — and why do I need it? When it comes to preventing the introduction and spread of plant pests and pathogens, a proactive approach that intelligently targets areas of highest risk is better than reacting to things as they happen. The goal of a systems approach isn‘t perfection — it’s significant risk reduction. By making your nursery less susceptible to the introduction and spread of regulated pests and plant pathogens, you will be able to reduce the risk of quarantines and crop destruction. (Cover photographs by Curt Kipp, Oregon Association of Nurseries.) ISBN 978-0-615-50862-7 Safe Procurement and Production Manual Safe Procurement and Production Manual A Systems Approach for the Production of Healthy Nursery Stock By John A. Griesbach Jennifer L. Parke Gary A. Chastagner Niklaus J. Grünwald John Aguirre Edited by Curt Kipp With a foreword by Jeff Stone Oregon Association of Nurseries Wilsonville, Oregon, USA Dr. John A. Griesbach is a plant pathologist and the owner of Ascent Agricultural Services LLC, and courtesy faculty member, Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University. Dr. Jennifer L. Parke is an associate professor/senior research in the Department of Crop and Soil Science at Oregon State University. Gary A. Chastagner is a plant pathologist and extension specialist at Washington State University Puyallup Research and Extension Center. Dr. Niklaus J. Grünwald is a research plant pathologist, USDA Agricultural Research Service and associate professor (courtesy), Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University.
    [Show full text]
  • New Nursery Literature
    Forest Nursery Notes Winter 2013 New Nursery Literature Special Order Publications Forest Nursery Pests Raising Native Plants in Nurseries: Michelle M Cram, Michelle S Frank, and Basic Concepts Katy M Mallams, Technical Coordinators R. Kasten Dumroese, Thomas D. Landis and Tara Luna June 2012 June 2012 Agriculture Handbook 680. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-274. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO 202 p. 84 p. To Order Either of these Publications: A limited number of hard copies are available from: USDA-FS, Rocky Mountain Station 240 West Prospect Road • Fort Collins, CO 80526; TEL: 970.498.1392 E-mail: [email protected] Both of these publications can be read or downloaded in Adobe PDF format from the RNGR website: http://rngr.net 33 Forest Nursery Notes Winter 2013 A compact disk with all the following journal articles or publications in Adobe PDF format can be or- dered using the Literature Order Form on the last page of this section. Note the 2 restrictions: 1. Copyrighted Material. Items with © are copyrighted and require a fee for each copy, so we will only send you the title page and abstract. If you want the entire article, you can order copies on-line or from a library service. 2. Special Orders (SO). Special orders are books or other publications that, because of their size or cost, require special handling. For some, the Forest Service has procured copies for free distribution, but others will have to be purchased. Prices and ordering instructions are given following each listing in the New Nursery Literature section.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Rates of Return on Shortleaf Pine Stands in Arkansas Between 1978 and 1995
    FINANCIAL RATES OF RETURN ON SHORTLEAF PINE STANDS IN ARKANSAS BETWEEN 1978 AND 1995 Andrew J. Hartsell1 ABSTRACT.—The objectives of this study are to estimate the annual rate of change in value of Arkansas’ shortleaf pine forests using fi nancial maturity concepts and to compare it to the change in other forest types and alternative investment options. Timber Mart-South stumpage price data were combined with inventory data spanning 17 years from the USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) unit. Two distinct FIA survey periods were utilized, resulting in a study period ranging from 1978 to 1995. The average annual real rate of return on all Arkansas timberland investments during this time frame was 5.8 percent using simple fi nancial maturity and 3.3 percent using adjusted fi nancial maturity. Stands comprising primarily of shortleaf pine outperformed these state averages during this period, averaging 6.5 percent and 3.9 percent annually using simple and adjusted fi nancial maturity models, respectively. Average annual rates of change in value were computed and compared for shortleaf pine and four other forest-type groups. Additionally, comparisons were made between forest type and ecoregion to determine which scenario produced the maximum rate of return. The highest earning shortleaf stands were found in the Arkansas Valley section of the State, with value changes of 8.2 percent per year for the simple fi nancial maturity model and 6.9 percent per year for the adjusted model. INTRODUCTION STUDY AREA Historically, shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) The study area consists of the 75 counties of Arkansas, ecosystems have played an important role in Arkansas forest with the emphasis on timberlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Hi -Tech Nursery and Quality Transplant Production in Vegetable Crops
    Hi -tech Nursery and Quality Transplant Production in Vegetable Crops Tissue culture for large-scale multiplication of elite clones of pointed gourd Shoot initiation Shoot multilplication Root initiation A.K. Pandey College of Horticulture and Forestry Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi-284003 Correct Citation Hi -tech Nursery and Quality Transplant Production in Vegetable Crops Year of Publication 2020 Compiled and Edited A.K.Pandey Compilation Assistance G. S. Abrol ® All Rights Reserved College of Horticulture and Forestry Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi-284003 Hi -tech Nursery and Quality Transplant Production in Vegetable Crops A.K. Pandey College of Horticulture and Forestry College of Horticulture and Forestry Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi-284003 Vice-Chancellor RLBCAU Jhansi-284003 Prof. Arvind Kumar FOREWORD India is a leading vegetable producing country in the world with an annual production of 184.9 million MT in an estimated area of 10.26 million ha, having the productivity of 18.43 MT/ ha (NHB, 2018-19), ranking next to China. In the recent past, the country has made quantum jump in production but our productivity in most of the vegetables is low as compared to China and other leading vegetable producing countries. The higher productivity in these countries is due to the coverage of maximum area under hybrids unlike open pollinated varieties in India. The area under hybrids varies with the crop, season and availability of hybrid seeds in our country for example, area under hybrid tomato is 40 %, cabbage 68.6%, brinjal 82% and okra covers around 10 percent whereas, a country like Japan is having entire area under hybrid in most of the vegetables.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nursery Industry - Protecting Our Environment 1) Contents
    A Guide for Gardeners in WET Queensland Wet Tropics TROPICS The Nursery Industry - Protecting Our Environment 1) Contents 1. Contents 2. Acknowledgements 3. Introduction from the Ministers 4. Introduction 5. What is Grow Me Instead? 6. Establishing the criteria for Grow Me Instead 7. What you can do! 8. Controlling weeds 9. The invasive plants and their alternatives Trees and Shrubs Climbing and Ground Cover Plants Berried Plants Grasses Bulbous Plants Succulent Plants Aquatic Plants 10. Invasive plant index 11. Further information and additional resources 2 Cover photo courtesy of Cairns Botanic Gardens 2) Acknowledgements • The ‘Grow Me Instead’ (GMI) project was first initiated by the Nursery and Garden Industry of NSW & ACT (NGINA) as a voluntary partnership with its member nurseries to encourage the removal from production and sale of plants known to be invasive in the natural environment. • This Queensland Wet-Tropics Bioregion ‘Grow Me Instead’ booklet has been produced by NGIQ through funding from the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country. Australian Government NRM Team GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Ph 1 800 552008 (Toll Free) Web www.nrm.gov.au • Special thanks go to Grow Me Instead project coordinator Barry Naylor (NGIQ) and project manager John McDonald (Nursery Industry Development Manager NGIQ). • The Nursery and Garden Industry Queensland would like to acknowledge the people who generously contributed their time and expertise and who provided a wealth of information towards the production of this booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas 1 Arkansas
    Arkansas 1 Arkansas Estado de Arkansas State of Arkansas Estado de los Estados Unidos Bandera Escudo Otros nombres: The Natural State, Land of Opp Lema: Regnat populus (en latín) [1] [1] Coordenadas Coordenadas: 34°48′N 92°12′O Coordenadas: 34°48′N 92°12′O • Longitud 89°41'O a 94°42'O Capital Little Rock • Población 184.564 Entidad Estado • País Estados Unidos Gobernador Mike Beebe (D) Senadores Mark Pryor (D) Blanche Lincoln (D) Subdivisiones 75 condados Fundación 15 de junio de 1836 Admisión 25º estado Superficie Puesto 29.º de 50 • Total 137 733 km² • Agua 2 875 (2,1%) km² Altitud • Media 198 msnm • Máxima 839 msnm • Mínima 17 msnm Población (2012) Puesto 32.º de 50 [2] • Total 2,949,131 hab. • Densidad 20,58 hab/km² Gentilicio arkansés, sa Arkansas 2 PIB (nominal) • Total (2005) USD 95.371 millones • PIB per cápita USD 33.643 IDH 0,710 (47.º de 50) – medio Huso horario Central: UTC-6/-5 Código postal AR ISO 3166-2 US-AR [3] Sitio web oficial Arkansas ([ˈɑɹkənsɔː] en inglés y /arkánsas/ en castellano) es un estado del centro-suroeste (región Sur) de los Estados Unidos de América,[] con capital en la ciudad de Little Rock. Limita con el río Misisipi, y los estados de Misuri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Luisiana, Texas y Misisipi. El nombre del estado deriva de la palabra kansas (el término con que los indios algonquinos designaban a los indios quapaw), tal como la pronunciaban los franceses en el siglo XVII.[4] La geografía diversa del estado parte de las regiones montañosas del Ozark y las montañas de Ouachita, que componen las tierras altas del interior de los EE.
    [Show full text]