DOCSLIB.ORG

Tractatus Logico-Theologicus Purports to Break New Ground Apologetically, As Did the Tractatus Logico- LOGICO-LOGICO- Philosophicus Epistemologically

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tractatus Logico-Theologicus Purports to Break New Ground Apologetically, As Did the Tractatus Logico- LOGICO-LOGICO- Philosophicus Epistemologically Professor Montgomery, while a student at Cornell University, had contact with Norman Malcolm, disciple and close friend of Wittgenstein, and cut his teeth in formal logic under the instruction of Max Black, allegedly one of the very few to have understood on first reading Russell and Whitehead‘s argumentation in their Principia Mathematica. Montgomery‘s university teaching career in history, law, literature, and theology, combined with that philosophical background, led to the production of the present work, which offers a comprehensive apologetic for classical Christianity. Consisting of over 1,800 propositions in logical sequence, Montgomery‘s Tractatus is accompanied by detailed scripture, name, and subject indexes. The coverage is remarkable, embracing logic, literature, history, myth, science, philosophy, jurisprudence, political theory, and theology – interspersed throughout with the wit and rapier thrusts of a TRACTATUSTRACTATUS barrister at home in adversarial contexts. Wittgenstein‘s Tractatus, having demonstrated the limits of any non-transcendental attempt to understand the world, ended with the proposition, “Of that which one cannot speak, one must remain silent.” Montgomery, after setting forth in depth the overwhelming case for the very transcendental revelation for which Wittgenstein longed but never found, concludes: “Whereof one can speak, thereof one must not be silent.” The Tractatus Logico-Theologicus purports to break new ground apologetically, as did the Tractatus Logico- LOGICO-LOGICO- Philosophicus epistemologically. It should be of particular interest to philosophers of religion, theologians, pastors, historians of ideas, and to everyone seeking solid answers for the ultimate questions which plague all of us at one time or another, especially during what St John of the Cross labeled “the dark night of the soul.” Professor Montgomery, a UK and US citizen, resides in England and in France. He is the author and editor of more than THEOLOGICUS fifty books in five languages (for information about his other publications, see http://www.ciltpp.com). Biographical THEOLOGICUS articles on him appear in Who‘s Who in America, Who‘s Who in France, the European Biographical Directory, Contemporary Authors, and Who‘s Who in the World. “The name of John Warwick Montgomery deserves to be mentioned alongside of C. S. Lewis and Francis Schaeffer as one of the 20th century’s most articulate defenders of historic Christianity. Written in the style of the early Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Theologicus is vintage Montgomery. It brings together and updates several decades of his thought, as it provides a clear, articulate defense of the truth of Christianity, the existence of God, the inerrancy of Holy Scripture, and the fundamental importance of Christian revelation for addressing the human condition. I know of no other book like it, and given the renewed focus on religion in these troubled yet pluralistic times, Tractatus Logico-Theologicus is must reading for anyone who wants to know how to choose a religion intelligently.” J. P. Moreland, Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, La Mirada, California “John Warwick Montgomery is one of the most important apologists for biblical Christianity in our time. This is his magnum opus. In it he refutes pluralism (the view that all religions are just different ways to God and none is a THEOLOGICUS LOGICO - TRACTATUS superior way of salvation) and postmodernism (the view that there is no discoverable truth that is both universal and absolute); he then sets out the evidence validating Christianity’s truth claim. Do not go into battle without reading this book.” Paul D. Feinberg, Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Deerfield, Illinois 3rd revised edition ISBN 3-932829-80-8 JOHN WARWICK MONTGOMERY ISSN 1436-0292 Theologisches Lehr- und Studienmaterial 11 Theologisches Lehr- und Studienmaterial Theologisches Lehr- und Studienmaterial 11 Theologisches Lehr- und Studienmaterial Verlag für Kultur und Wissenschaft (Culture and Science Publ.) Dr. Thomas Schirrmacher VKW VKW VKW John Warwick Montgomery John Warwick Montgomery TRACTATUS LOGICO-THEOLOGICUS Christliche Philosophie heute Christian Philosophy Today Quomodo Philosophia Christianorum Hodie Estimatur Band 1 Band 1 John Warwick Montgomery Tractatus Logico-Theologicus Band 2 John W. Montgomery Hat die Weltgeschichte einen Sinn? Geschichtsphilosophien auf dem Prüfstand Band 3 John W. Montgomery Jésus: La raison rejoint l'historie Band 4 Horst Waldemar Beck Marken dieses Äons: Wissenschaftskritische und theologische Diagnosen Band 5 Ross Clifford John Warwick Montgomery’s Legal Apologetic Theologisches Lehr- und Studienmaterial (Martin Bucer Seminar) Band 11 im Auftrag des Martin Bucer Seminars herausgegeben von Dr. Thomas Schirrmacher John Warwick Montgomery TRACTATUS LOGICO-THEOLOGICUS John Warwick Montgomery A.B. with Distinction in Philosophy, Cornell University B.L.S., M.A., University of California at Berkeley B.D., S.T.M., Wittenberg University M.Phil. in Law, University of Essex, England LL.M., LL.D., Cardiff University, Wales Ph.D., University of Chicago Th.D., University of Strasbourg, France Dr. (h.c.), Institute for Religion and Law, Moscow, Russia Christian Philosophy Today 1 Theologisches Lehr- und Studienmaterial 11 Verlag für Kultur und Wissenschaft Culture and Science Publ. Bonn 2005 Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP - Einheitsaufnahme Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar. Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie;detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.ddb.de. © 2005 by Prof. Dr Dr Dr John Warwick Montgomery, 2, rue de Rome 67000 Strasbourg France e-mail: [email protected] 1. Aufl. 2002, 2. überarb. Aufl. 2003, 3. überarb. Aufl. 2005 1st edition 2002, 2nd revised edition 2003, 3rd revised edition 2005 ISBN 3-938116-03-X ISSN 1436-0292 (Theologisches Lehr- und Studienmaterial) Printed in Germany Satz: Ron Kubsch Umschlaggestaltung und Gesamtherstellung: BoD Beese Druck, Friedensallee 76, 22765 Hamburg Verlag für Kultur und Wissenschaft (Culture and Science Publ.) Friedrichstr. 38, 53111 Bonn Fax 0228/9650389 www.vkwonline.de/[email protected] Verlagsauslieferung: Hänssler Verlag 71087 Holzgerlingen, Tel. 07031/7414-177 Fax -119 www.haenssler.de/[email protected] For A “ Fellowship of the Ring”—Andreae’s Civitas Christiana Harold O. J. Brown Ross Clifford Howard Hoffman Will Moore Craig Parton George Poulos Rod Rosenbladt Alex Dos Santos Jeff Schwarz Gene Edward Veith Graham Walker Todd Wilken And Its Members Already in the Western Isles Herman Eckelmann Walter Martin Robert Preus INTRODUCTION Of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Wittgenstein wrote: “Perhaps this book will be understood only by someone who has himself already had the thoughts that are expressed in it—or at least similar thoughts.—So it is not a textbook.” The same may be said of the present work. Critics will attack this Tractatus on a number of grounds. The religious liberals, the presuppositionalists, and the pietists will dismiss it as a work of rationalism. Theological conservatives will say that Wittgenstein was little more than a misguided mystic and unworthy of offering methodolog- ical insights in the religious area. Many in the philosophical community will say that a work such as this shows no recognition of the replacement of Wittgenstein I by Wittgenstein II—the Wittgenstein of the Philosophi- cal Investigations, who allegedly gave up all interest in verification for the sake of linguistic analysis and the substitution of puzzles for genuine phil- osophical problems. Since the present work is only structurally modeled on the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, much of this criticism will be beside the point. But we note en passant that Wittgenstein himself wanted his Philosophical In- vestigations, if published, to appear bound together with his Tractatus: surely indicating that he did not intend his language games to float free of all relationship with the world, much less of verification. G. A. Smith has quite properly shown that Wittgenstein’s later philosophy of language cre- ates legitimate scepticism concerning “the presumption that rational, log- ical thinking is always or ultimately a deductive mental process. But this is not to cast doubt on the possibility of rational, logical thinking.”1And to those in philosophy and in religion who regard verification as unimportant, we point out the obvious: either they think that all mutually contradictory positions are somehow true; or they are unconcerned with the effects of metaphysical error on individual and societal life. One would think that the events of 11 September 2001 would have put paid to such indifferentism. The author, though an undergraduate majoring in philosophy and the classics at Cornell University during the time Wittgenstein visited Norman 1 Gene Anne Smith, “Wittgenstein and the Sceptical Fallacy,” 3/2 Canadian J. of Law and Jurisprudence 155 at 179-80 (July 1990); cf. C. B. Daly, “New Light on Wittgenstein,” 10 Philo- sophical Studies 5-49 (1960). 7 Malcolm, never had the privilege of meeting Wittgenstein. There was con- tact with Malcolm, who perhaps
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Memorials 2005
    Scholars Crossing SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations 3-2005 Memorials 2005 James A. Borland Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Borland, James A., "Memorials 2005" (2005). SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations. 58. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs/58 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JETS 48/1 (March 2005) 213–20 MEMORIALS gleason leonard archer, jr. Gleason Leonard Archer, Jr. was born on May 22, 1916, in Norwell, MA, the third child of Elizabeth (Snyder) and Gleason Archer, Sr. His older sib- lings were a brother, Allen, and a sister, Marion. Gleason grew up in Boston and attended Boston Latin School. His father founded the Suffolk University Law School in Boston where the family lived during the school year, retreat- ing to Norwell during the summers. Gleason’s mother was a Christian, a member of the Park Street Church, and he came to know Christ at an early age through her influence. Gleason attended Harvard College and received his B.A. degree in 1938, followed in 1939 by his LL.B. degree from Suffolk University Law School in Boston. His took his A.M. degree from Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in 1940, and his Ph.D. from the same institution in 1944. He grad- uated with his Bachelor of Divinity from Princeton Theological Seminary the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inerrancy and Authority of Scripture in Christian Apologetics
    The Journal of Ministry & Theology 50 The Inerrancy and Authority of Scripture in Christian Apologetics Lee Allen Anderson Jr. INTRODUCTION Scripture’s call to Christians to engage in the apologetic task is markedly obvious. For example, 1 Peter 3:15 instructs believers to always be “ready to make a defense (ἀπολογίαν) to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you.” Similarly, Jude 3 exhorts Christians to “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints.” Here, the “faith” refers not to the subjective element of personal trust in the Lord God, but instead to that “body of truth that very early in the church’s history took on a definite form,” that is, the content of Christian faith—doctrinal truth (cf. Gal 1:23; 1 Tim 4:1).1 Implicit in this verse, therefore, is the acknowledgment of the fact that a certain body of doctrinal truth exists, which in turn implies a source or origin for that doctrinal truth. For the Christian, the principle, authoritative source of doctrinal truth is the “God-breathed” holy Scriptures (2 Tim 3:16). The reliability of Scripture as a standard for Christian doctrine hinges on the fact that, as the inspired word of the true God who does not lie (Num 23:19; Titus 1:2; Heb 6:18), it is wholly true (Ps 119:160; John 17:17). To echo the words of the longstanding affirmation of the Evangelical Theological Society, “The Bible alone, and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God written and is therefore inerrant in the autographs.”2 This affirmation is not a peripheral issue to Christian theology; it is germane to the life of the church and, of logical consequence, the upholding of the Christian faith.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rapture in Twenty Centuries of Biblical Interpretation
    TMSJ 13/2 (Fall 2002) 149-171 THE RAPTURE IN TWENTY CENTURIES OF BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION James F. Stitzinger Associate Professor of Historical Theology The coming of God’s Messiah deserves closer attention than it has often received. The future coming of the Messiah, called the “rapture,” is imminent, literal and visible, for all church saints, before the hour of testing, premillennial, and, based on a literal hermeneutic, distinguishes between Israel and the church. The early church fathers’ views advocated a sort of imminent intra- or post- tribulationism in connection with their premillennial teaching. With a few exceptions, the Medieval church writers said little about a future millennium and a future rapture. Reformation leaders had little to say about prophetic portions of Scripture, but did comment on the imminency of Christ’s return. The modern period of church history saw a return to the early church’s premillennial teaching and a pretribulational rapture in the writings of Gill and Edwards, and more particularly in the works of J. N. Darby. After Darby, pretribulationism spread rapidly in both Great Britain and the United States. A resurgence of posttribulationism came after 1952, accompanied by strong opposition to pretribulationism, but a renewed support of pretribulationism has arisen in the recent past. Five premillennial views of the rapture include two major views—pretribulationism and posttribulation-ism—and three minor views—partial, midtribulational, and pre-wrath rapturism. * * * * * Introduction The central theme of the Bible is the coming of God’s Messiah. Genesis 3:15 reveals the first promise of Christ’s coming when it records, “He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel.”1 Revelation 22:20 unveils the last promise when it records “He who testifies to these things says, ‘Yes, I am coming quickly,’ Amen.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanity's Capacity to Apprehend Aesthetic Value
    Submission Page Humanity’s Capacity to Apprehend Aesthetic Value as an Argument for God’s Existence To Fulfill the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Divinity Liberty University Walter Hurst Davis Sr. Read and Approved by: Chairperson: _ Dr. Dan Mitchell_______________________ Reader: _____Dr. Joseph Wooddell____________________ Reader: ______Dr. Samuel Smith_____________________ Date: ___May 6, 2016_________________ Liberty University Humanity’s Capacity to Apprehend Aesthetic Value as an Argument for God’s Existence A Dissertation Submitted to The Faculty of the Rawlings School of Divinity In Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Divinity by Walter Hurst Davis Sr. Lynchburg, VA May 2016 Copyright Page Copyright © 2016 Walter H. Davis Sr. All Rights Reserved ii Dedication To my faithful wife Dodie Mae Davis, my children and grandchildren, for their faithful endurance. I chose to endure the inconveniences of this process. They did not. iii Contents Preface ix Acknowledgements xi Abstract xiii Introduction 1 Clarifying the Role of Theistic Arguments 6 The Relevance of the Thesis 10 The Argument and Reasoning Methods 11 The Vital Relationship between Theology and Apologetics 12 The Place for this Study in Apologetics 15 The Plan for the Study 20 Chapter 1: A Defense of Abductive Reasoning in Light of Other Reasoning Methods 22 Deductive Reasoning 25 Hesitancy in Using Deductive Reasoning 26 Deciding Against the Use of Deduction 36 Inductive Reasoning 38 The Inductive Nature of the Evidential
    [Show full text]
  • How Far Beyond Chicago? Assessing Recent Attempts to Reframe the Inerrancy Debate — Jason S
    Themelios 34.1 (2009): 26-49 How Far Beyond Chicago? Assessing Recent Attempts to Reframe the Inerrancy Debate — Jason S. Sexton — Jason Sexton is a licensed minister with the Evangelical Free Church of America and PhD candidate in Systematic Theology at The University of St. Andrews, Scotland. he doctrine of inerrancy has been a watershed issue among evangelicals in the West, perhaps now Tmore evident than ever.1 While the inerrancy debate never entirely dissipated from its last spell in the late 1970s and early 1980s, it recently surged to the forefront of discussions about an evan- gelical doctrine of Scripture both in North America and abroad. This transpired with recent events in the Evangelical Theological Society (hereafter, ETS) dealing with inerrancy2 and fresh publications of at least a dozen books, articles, and reviews.3 With this new rally, one might say that evangelicalism is 1 It was designated a “watershed” over three decades ago by Harold Lindsell, The Battle for the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1976), 26–27, and eight years later by Francis A. Schaeffer, The Great Evangelical Disaster (Wheaton: Crossway, 1984), 44. The degree of watershed was challenged early by Richard H. Bube, “Inerrancy Is/Is Not the Watershed of Evangeli- calism: None of the Above,” Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation 29 (March 1977): 46–47, who called for “revelational inerrancy,” asserting that the term “inerrancy” outlived its usefulness. Some, however, see the inerrancy debate as a watershed for other reasons—because of a “classically modern” view of truth that made inerrancy the “foundational Christian doctrine upon which all others depend.” Jeffery Stephen Oldfield, “The Word Became Text and Dwells Among Us? An Examination of the Doctrine of Inerrancy” (PhD thesis, University of St Andrews, 2007), 232–33.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © 2019 Alan Joseph Pihringer
    Copyright © 2019 Alan Joseph Pihringer All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. FROM ORR TO ZACHARIAS AND BEYOND: AN APPROACH TOWARD CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS FROM THE PURVIEW OF WORLDVIEW TRUTH-TESTING __________________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________________ by Alan Joseph Pihringer May 2019 APPROVAL SHEET FROM ORR TO ZACHARIAS AND BEYOND: AN APPROACH TOWARD CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS FROM THE PURVIEW OF WORLDVIEW TRUTH-TESTING Alan Joseph Pihringer Read and Approved by: __________________________________________ James Parker III (Chair) __________________________________________ Mark T. Coppenger __________________________________________ Theodore J. Cabal Date______________________________ To my lovely bride, Trisha Pihringer, whose constant sacrifice, support, love, and encouragement have made this possible. God has used you to make me a better man, husband, father, pastor, and theologian. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE ......................................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORIALS Gleason Leonard Archer
    JETS 48/1 (March 2005) 213–20 MEMORIALS gleason leonard archer, jr. Gleason Leonard Archer, Jr. was born on May 22, 1916, in Norwell, MA, the third child of Elizabeth (Snyder) and Gleason Archer, Sr. His older sib- lings were a brother, Allen, and a sister, Marion. Gleason grew up in Boston and attended Boston Latin School. His father founded the Suffolk University Law School in Boston where the family lived during the school year, retreat- ing to Norwell during the summers. Gleason’s mother was a Christian, a member of the Park Street Church, and he came to know Christ at an early age through her influence. Gleason attended Harvard College and received his B.A. degree in 1938, followed in 1939 by his LL.B. degree from Suffolk University Law School in Boston. His took his A.M. degree from Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in 1940, and his Ph.D. from the same institution in 1944. He grad- uated with his Bachelor of Divinity from Princeton Theological Seminary the following year. There he studied Hebrew, Aramaic, and Arabic. On May 11, 1939, Gleason married Virginia Lillian Atkinson at Park Street Church, with H. J. Ockenga presiding. Gleason taught languages at Suffolk University in Boston and served on that school’s Trustee Board. Gleason was also an assistant pastor at Park Street Church in Boston and assistant dean of the Boston Evening School of the Bible. His taste for the Old Testament came from Harold John Ockenga, pastor of the Park Street Church. Gleason and Virginia, with their two sons, then moved to Pasadena, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • The THOUGHTFUL CHRISTIAN
    The THOUGHTFUL CHRISTIAN BY David S. Dockery David S. Dockery has been the president of Trinity International University (Deerfield, Illinois) since 2014, before which he served as president of Union University (Jackson, Tennessee) for more than 18 years. A recognized leader in Christian higher education across the United States, Dr. Dockery has spoken at more than 50 colleges, universities and seminaries, and has served on the boards of numerous organizations, including the CCCU (board chair from 2005–6), the International Association of Baptist Colleges and Universities, Christianity Today International (consulting editor for more than 20 years), the Prison Fellowship Ministries, and the Evangelical Theological Society (vice-president and president). He is the author or editor of more than 30 books, including his highly acclaimed Renewing Minds. Serving Church and Society through Christian Higher Education (2008). The Christ on Campus Initiative exists to inspire students on college and university campuses to think wisely, act with conviction, and become more Christ-like by providing relevant and excellent evangelical resources on contemporary issues. We aim to distribute resources—prepared by top evangelical scholars, pastors, and thinkers—that are intellectually rigorous, persuasive in argument, appealing in tone, and consistent with historic evangelical Christianity. The Christ on Campus Initiative is generously supported by the Carl F. H. Henry Center for Theological Understanding (a ministry of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School) and the MAC Foundation. This essay is Copyright © 2018 by Christ on Campus Initiative (CCI). Readers and organizations may circulate this and other CCI essays without charge. The THOUGHTFUL CHRISTIAN BY David S. Dockery As the workday concluded on read “be kind and compassionate to the Trinity campus prior to the one another” (Ephesians 4:32a).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Entire Program
    'll'l!JJt~ J!E f!JN~!J W fG If rJ -J ct rR> lJ 'If'flNB® !J,f!J) J&S(C~ [J $®(CSB~:J' presce ro FJs Mt~ November 19-21, 1998 / Radisson Twin Towers Orlando, Florida www.etsjets.org ~ ffi ~Ilfi® il?®mll~®ffi ll®rP 'IT®lilLP @mro;lli The study of Greek is often a struggle for students. That's why it's important to have the right textbook to lay the ~roundwork. For many, Basics of Biblical Greek, by William 0. Mounce. has become that hook. This highly acclaimed text makes learning Greek a natural (UU!UG) process, even for those who aren't natural at \earning languages. By dealing with the New Testament text from the beginning, it makes dear that knowledge of Greek helps in under­ William D. Mounce standing the New Testament-another struggle smdcnts often have. Written from the stu­ dent's perspective, Basics of Biblical Greek combines the best of the inductive and FOR INFORM.ATION ON o\DOnlNG deductive methods. llelp your students hegin to master Greek with what Frank Thielman AND OTHER BOOKS FROM OI1R LI~"E OF calls ''the finest New Testament grmnmar avai\ahle." GKEEK U:XTS, COIVTACT JACK KRAGT, ACAOF.MIC SPEC:IALISf, AT ORAT [email protected] ©roll~®:rnLlwffio ~@o '""/tile .~/N~Iory o•J I itn,rry 1\,.,,u•/o,l~o:•· ©:wffili®ru]]XID~ - I!§ 17J:M!rce lflJ MelflJ1l11i1l11g i1J1J 'J!7bi§ Jf'exfl? The Bible, the Reader, and the Morality of Literary Knowledge by Kevin J. Vanhomcr Is there a meaning in the text of the Bible, or is meaning mther a matler o[ who is reading or of how one reads' Docs evangelical Christian tioctrine have an)thing to contribute to debates about interpretation, literary theorr, anti postmo~emi~·> These are questions of cmcial importance for contemporary brblical snrdies and theology alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Midwestern Journal of Theology Contents
    MIDWESTERN JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY Vol. 10 Fall 2011 No. 2 CONTENTS Editorial Articles THEME: INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE The Inerrancy of Scripture: What Do We Mean? Is it Important? JOHN DOUGLAS MORRISON 1-19 ―By What Authority Do We Say These Things?‖ Dualism and the Modern Rejection of Biblical Authority JOHN DOUGLAS MORRISON 20-38 Misquoting Bart: The Story Behind Who Changed Misquoting Jesus and Why RADU GHEORGHITA 39-54 Theme Classic: ―The Inerrancy of the Original Autographs‖ (1893) BENJAMIN B. WARFIELD 55-61 Paradigm Shifts: The Philosophical Hermeneutics of Friedrich Schleiermacher WILLIAM R. OSBORNE 62-74 Two Strategies of Interpretation THOR MADSEN 75-88 ―Justified by Faith – After All That We Can Do!‖ Mormon Soteriology and the Doctrine of Justification by Faith 89-100 R. PHILIP ROBERTS Another Look at James Arminius and the Dutch Reformation JERRY SUTTON 101-32 ii The Art of the New Testament Front-Piece of the 1611 King James Bible RONALD V. HUGGINS 133-56 Book Reviews 157-77 Recovering the Real Lost Gospel: Reclaiming the Gospel as Good News by Darrell L. Bock. (David Noble) 157-59 Theological Anthropology: A Guide for the Perplexed by Marc Cortez (Christopher J. Black) 159-61 Revisiting the Days of Genesis: A Study of the Use of Time in Genesis 1-11 in Light of Its Ancient Near Eastern and Literary Context, B.C. Hodge (William K. Bechtold III) 161-64 God Behaving Badly: Is the God of the Old Testament Angry, Sexist and Racist? David T. Lamb (William K. Bechtold III) 164-66 Hipster Christianity: When Church and Cool Collide, Brett McCracken.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © 2014 Derek James Brown All Rights Reserved. the Southern
    Copyright © 2014 Derek James Brown All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. A THEOLOGICAL REASSESSMENT AND REFORMULATION OF THE CHICAGO STATEMENT ON BIBLICAL INERRANCY IN LIGHT OF CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENTS _________________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary _________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _________________ by Derek James Brown May 2014 APPROVAL SHEET A THEOLOGICAL REASSESSMENT AND REFORMULATION OF THE CHICAGO STATEMENT ON BIBLICAL INERRANCY IN LIGHT OF CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENTS Derek James Brown Read and Approved by: __________________________________________ Gregg R. Allison (Chair) __________________________________________ Stephen J. Wellum __________________________________________ Thomas J. Nettles Date_____________________________ To Amy, “you surpass them all.” To Jim and Helen Brown, to honor you is my privilege and joy. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................... viii PREFACE ............................................................................................................................x Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION: FACTORS LEADING TO THE CSBI .................................1 Thesis ..................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]