DOCSLIB.ORG

ABSTRACT Mountaintop Removal Mining and the Environmental

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ABSTRACT Mountaintop Removal Mining and the Environmental ABSTRACT Mountaintop Removal Mining and the Environmental Rhetoric of the 2010 West Virginia State Primary Campaign Rachel Ford, M.A. Mentor: Martin J. Medhurst, Ph.D. This project analyzes the rhetoric of the 2010 West Virginia special senate primary election paying particular attention to the candidates’ discussion of mountaintop removal mining—a controversial type of mining in which the tops of mountains are removed so that the coal seams deep within can be easily accessed. Recently the practice of mountaintop removal has gained public attention because of its negative environmental impacts. This thesis uses a critical historical approach as a lens through which to interpret the complex historical relationship that has developed between the state and the coal industry. This history is important to my analysis because it illuminates the ways in which the relationship shapes the motivations of each candidate. I attempt to further develop an understanding of how political candidates use rhetorical strategies and tactics to discuss environmental concerns in the context of an election campaign. Mountaintop Removal Mining and the Environmental Rhetoric of the 2010 West Virginia Special Senate Primary Campaign by Rachel Ford, B.A. A Thesis Approved by the Department of Communication Studies David W. Schlueter, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee Martin J. Medhurst, Ph.D., Chairperson Leslie A. Hahner, Ph.D. David K. Nichols, Ph.D. Accepted by the Graduate School May 2011 J. Larry Lyon, Ph.D., Dean Page bearing signatures is kept on file in the Graduate School. Copyright © 2011 by Rachel Ford All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER TWO .............................................................................................................. 17 History of Coal in West Virginia .................................................................................. 17 The Development of Mountaintop Removal Mining .................................................... 35 CHAPTER THREE .......................................................................................................... 51 Byrd‘s Legislative History ............................................................................................ 51 Senator Byrd‘s Legislative History Regarding ............................................................. 55 The Coal Industry and Environmental Initiatives ......................................................... 55 The Evolution of Senator Byrd‘s Statements Regarding Mountaintop Removal ......... 67 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 69 CHAPTER FOUR ............................................................................................................. 76 Calling The Election...................................................................................................... 76 CHAPTER FIVE ............................................................................................................ 103 Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 103 Democratic Party candidates ....................................................................................... 107 Republican Party candidates ....................................................................................... 117 Mountain Party candidate............................................................................................ 128 CHAPTER SIX ............................................................................................................... 134 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 134 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Throughout my life I have been blessed beyond measure by many people who have inspired and challenged me. This thesis would have been entirely impossible without their guidance, encouragement, and support. First, and most importantly, I would like to thank my parents, Arlene and Barney Ford, who taught me the importance of working hard and trying my best no matter the obstacle. I am indebted to my sisters, Sarah and Jessica, who have been wonderful role models and have always encourage me to follow my own path. I would also like to thank Marla and Chuck Sandridge for adopting me into their extended family, and the joy that they have brought to my life. During my time at Appalachian State, Kris Willis introduced me to academic debate and helped me to find my voice. For his patience and encouragement, I will always be grateful. In addition to being one of the bravest women I know, Mariam Willis is deserving of my thanks for being a breath of fresh air and a dear friend. I would also like to thank Dr. Janice Pope who opened my eyes to the issue of mountaintop removal. I would like to give special thanks to the individuals who played a special role during my time at Baylor. First, I would like to thank my thesis director, Dr. Martin J. Medhurst, without whom this project would not have been possible. Throughout this thesis process he has been unfailingly patient and had provided me with insightful feedback. To Dr. Leslie Hahner I would like to give my most sincere gratitude. As both a professor and a member on my thesis committee, Dr. Hahner has been a true example of scholarly excellence, and for her valuable insights I am very thankful. Dr. Scott Varda iv also merits special consideration. Throughout my time at Baylor, Dr. Varda has proved to be one of the kindest and most genuine people that I am privileged to know. In finishing, two people in particular merit special recognition. Kathleen Kalish has been my most dear friend and soul sister for many years. As my favorite enemy of the status quo, Kathleen has inspired me to always grow and develop as a person. Without her daily encouragement and practical doses of reality, I would not be the person I am today. Throughout this process my wonderful partner, Tommy McElroy, has been a constant and invaluable source of love and support. I am blessed beyond words to have him in my life. v CHAPTER ONE Introduction On July 20, 2010, Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia passed away at the age of 92, leaving the Senate seat he occupied for over 51 years empty. Shortly after the senator‘s death, terms were set for a special election and 14 candidates began jockeying for Byrd‘s seat. The special election campaigns spanned over five weeks ending, on August 28, with the primary election. Within the context of the campaigns, the practice of surface mining, and specifically mountain top removal (MTR), became an important issue. Former senator and West Virginia secretary of state Ken Hechler was responsible for making MTR a point of campaign controversy. At age ninety-five, Hechler entered the senate race and stated, "Mountaintop removal is my number one issue, and it will be the first bill I will introduce into the Senate.‖1 By exclusively focusing on MTR, Hechler forced the other candidates to make decisions about the way they would engage or disengage the MTR debate. The Nature of the Problem From a rhetorical perspective, this West Virginia special election campaign is of particular interest because of the exigency that exists between the State‘s economic and cultural ties to the coal industry and increasing environmental consciousness and concern about MTR. Analyzing the campaign through the lens of the issue of MTR provides a unique opportunity to understand both environmental and campaign-based rhetoric within the larger frame of West Virginian history and culture. To fully understand the rhetorical strategies deployed by candidates it is vital to explore what Loyd Bitzer terms the 1 rhetorical situation. For Bitzer, the rhetorical situation is not merely the context in which the speech occurs, it is the realization that ―a particular discourse comes into existence because of some specific condition or situation which invites utterance.‖2 The Rhetorical Situation Since the discovery of coal in West Virginia in 1742, the state has been, and continues to be, largely shaped by the coal industry. As result of the interlaced histories of coal and West Virginia, the relationship that West Virginians have with the coal industry is the foundation of the rhetorical situation that structures how candidates present arguments. Ronald Lewis in his 1991 research article, ―Appalachian Restructuring in Historical Perspective: Coal, Culture, and Social Change in West Virginia,‖ argues that the coal industry‘s involvement in the development of West Virginia is responsible for the ―rural-industrial‖ climate in the state today.3 Lewis argues that the rural-industrial culture in the state is at least partially responsible for the difficulty West Virginians have regulating the coal industry.4 To fully understand the rhetorical situation of the special election, an examination of the historical relationship between West Virginian coal workers and the coal industry is needed. Toward that end, this thesis will contribute a rhetorical history of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 111 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 156 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2010 No. 70 House of Representatives The House met at 12:30 p.m. and was NET REGULATION WILL HARM turned it over to the private sector and called to order by the Speaker. INVESTMENT AND INNOVATION lifted restrictions on its use by com- The SPEAKER pro tempore (Ms. mercial entities and the public. The f MARKEY of Colorado). The Chair recog- unregulated Internet is now starting to help spur a new technological revolu- MORNING-HOUR DEBATE nizes the gentleman from Florida (Mr. STEARNS) for 5 minutes. tion in this country. Where there were The SPEAKER. Pursuant to the Mr. STEARNS. Madam Speaker, a re- once separate phone, cable, wireless, order of the House of January 6, 2009, cent announcement by FCC Chairman and other industries providing distinct the Chair will now recognize Members Genachowski to impose new, burden- and separate services, we’re now seeing from lists submitted by the majority some regulation on the Internet and on a confluence and a blur of providers all and minority leaders for morning-hour Internet transmission appears to me to competing against each other for con- debate. be a political maneuver to regulate the sumers, offering broadband, voice, Internet. Several weeks ago, he indi- video services, and much more. f cated he was not going to push for net The Apple iPod is a perfect example of the confluence of the Internet, the FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964
    THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution:
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Committee Transfers to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee JOHN KERRY for PRESIDENT, INC. $3,000,000 GORE 2
    Campaign Committee Transfers to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee JOHN KERRY FOR PRESIDENT, INC. $3,000,000 GORE 2000 INC.GELAC $1,000,000 AL FRIENDS OF BUD CRAMER $125,000 AL COMMITTEE TO ELECT ARTUR DAVIS TO CONGRESS $10,000 AR MARION BERRY FOR CONGRESS $135,000 AR SNYDER FOR CONGRESS CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE $25,500 AR MIKE ROSS FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE $200,000 AS FALEOMAVAEGA FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE $5,000 AZ PASTOR FOR ARIZONA $100,000 AZ A WHOLE LOT OF PEOPLE FOR GRIJALVA CONGRESSNL CMTE $15,000 CA WOOLSEY FOR CONGRESS $70,000 CA MIKE THOMPSON FOR CONGRESS $221,000 CA BOB MATSUI FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE $470,000 CA NANCY PELOSI FOR CONGRESS $570,000 CA FRIENDS OF CONGRESSMAN GEORGE MILLER $310,000 CA PETE STARK RE-ELECTION COMMITTEE $100,000 CA BARBARA LEE FOR CONGRESS $40,387 CA ELLEN TAUSCHER FOR CONGRESS $72,000 CA TOM LANTOS FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE $125,000 CA ANNA ESHOO FOR CONGRESS $210,000 CA MIKE HONDA FOR CONGRESS $116,000 CA LOFGREN FOR CONGRESS $145,000 CA FRIENDS OF FARR $80,000 CA DOOLEY FOR THE VALLEY $40,000 CA FRIENDS OF DENNIS CARDOZA $85,000 CA FRIENDS OF LOIS CAPPS $100,000 CA CITIZENS FOR WATERS $35,000 CA CONGRESSMAN WAXMAN CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE $200,000 CA SHERMAN FOR CONGRESS $115,000 CA BERMAN FOR CONGRESS $215,000 CA ADAM SCHIFF FOR CONGRESS $90,000 CA SCHIFF FOR CONGRESS $50,000 CA FRIENDS OF JANE HARMAN $150,000 CA BECERRA FOR CONGRESS $125,000 CA SOLIS FOR CONGRESS $110,000 CA DIANE E WATSON FOR CONGRESS $40,500 CA LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD FOR CONGRESS $225,000 CA NAPOLITANO FOR CONGRESS $70,000 CA PEOPLE FOR JUANITA MCDONALD FOR CONGRESS, THE $62,000 CA COMMITTEE TO RE-ELECT LINDA SANCHEZ $10,000 CA FRIENDS OF JOE BACA $62,000 CA COMMITTEE TO RE-ELECT LORETTA SANCHEZ $150,000 CA SUSAN DAVIS FOR CONGRESS $100,000 CO SCHROEDER FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE, INC $1,000 CO DIANA DEGETTE FOR CONGRESS $125,000 CO MARK UDALL FOR CONGRESS INC.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 | 2015 CONTENTS ABOUT the ABOUT EAGLETON Eagleton Institute of Politics
    THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY Eagleton Institute of Politics 2014 | 2015 CONTENTS ABOUT THE ABOUT EAGLETON Eagleton Institute of Politics HE EAGLETON INSTITUTE OF POLITICS EXPLORES STATE AND NATIONAL POLITICS 1 through research, education, and public service, linking the study of politics with its day-to-dayT practice. Th e Institute focuses att ention on how the American political system MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR works, how it changes, and how it might work bett er. 2 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 8 RESEARCH CENTERS AND PROGRAMS 16 PUBLIC PROGRAMS Wood Lawn, home of the Eagleton Institute of Politics 20 EAGLETON’S FACULTY, CENTERS AND PROGRAMS SPECIALIZE IN THE STUDY OF: ■ state legislatures and governors; DONORS ■ public opinion polling and survey research; ■ women’s political participation; ■ minority and immigrant political behavior; 22 ■ campaigns, elections and political parties; ■ ethics; ALUMNI, FACULTY, STAFF AND ■ civic education and political engagement; VISITING ASSOCIATES ■ young elected leaders and youth political participation; ■ science and politics; ■ New Jersey politics. Back Cover Th e Institute includes the Center for American Women and Politics, the Eagleton Cen- EAGLETON ONLINE ter for Public Interest Polling, and the Center on the American Governor. Eagleton also houses the Cliff ord P. Case Professorship of Public Aff airs, the Arthur J. Holland Program on Ethics in Government, the Louis J. Gambaccini Civic Engagement Series, the Senator Wynona Lipman Chair in Women’s Political Leadership, and the Albert W. Lewitt En- dowed Lecture. For Rutgers undergraduate and graduate students, Eagleton off ers a range of education programs including an undergraduate certifi cate, graduate fellowships, research assistant- ships and internships, and opportunities to interact with political practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Elected Representatives in the 114Th Congress
    Newly Elected Representatives in the 114th Congress Contents Representative Gary Palmer (Alabama-6) ....................................................................................................... 3 Representative Ruben Gallego (Arizona-7) ...................................................................................................... 4 Representative J. French Hill (Arkansas-2) ...................................................................................................... 5 Representative Bruce Westerman (Arkansas-4) .............................................................................................. 6 Representative Mark DeSaulnier (California-11) ............................................................................................. 7 Representative Steve Knight (California-25) .................................................................................................... 8 Representative Peter Aguilar (California-31) ................................................................................................... 9 Representative Ted Lieu (California-33) ........................................................................................................ 10 Representative Norma Torres (California-35) ................................................................................................ 11 Representative Mimi Walters (California-45) ................................................................................................ 12 Representative Ken Buck (Colorado-4) .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Story: Byrd Teaching and Clinical Center
    2009-2010 Annual Fund YES! I/We want to support the School of Medicine Name______________________________________________________________________SOM Year of Graduation___________ MARSHALL UNIVERSITY JOAN C. EDWARDS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE Address ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ City _______________________________________________________ State______________Zip Code_____________________ Phone (H) __________________(W) __________________(Cell) __________________ Email____________________________ Enclosed is My/Our gift for: o $10,000 or above, Founder’s Circle o $499-$100, New Century Club SUMMER 2009 o $9,999 - $1,000, Dean's Associates o $99 or under, Benefactors o $999 - $500, Doctor's Memorial Society Please charge the full amount of my gift of $ ___________________________________________________ to: o Visa o MasterCard o American Express o Discover Cover Story: Card Number ___________________________________________________ Expiration Date _____________________________ Byrd teaching and clinical center Signature _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Unless otherwise indicated, your gift will be used where most needed and is tax deductible to the full extent of the law. Please See story on page 8 make your check payable to the Marshall University Foundation Inc., and return to Office of Development and Alumni Affairs, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, 1600 Medical Center Drive, Huntington,
    [Show full text]
  • Baker, James A.: Files Folder Title: Political Affairs January 1984-July 1984 (3) Box: 9
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Baker, James A.: Files Folder Title: Political Affairs January 1984-July 1984 (3) Box: 9 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ REAGAN-00SH'84 The President's Authorized Campaign Committee M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Jim Baker, Mike Deaver, Dick Darman, Margaret Tutwiler, Mike McManus THROUGH: Ed Rollins FROM: Doug Watts DATE: June 6, 1984 RE: Television Advertising Recently, the idea was advanced that Reagan-Bush '84 should develop negative television advertising - utilizing derisive issue and personality oriented statements made by Democratic presidential candidates about one another - to be broadcast during the periods ten days before and after the Democratic Convention {July 16-20). The thought apparently was to highlight within an issue framework, not only the chaotic and contentious democratic contest, but to point out the insipid, petty and self-serving manner in which the debate has been conducted. The attack themes presumably were to be directed primarily at Mondale and Hart before the convention and at the nominee following the convention. The above described approach was discussed Thursday and Friday {5/31/84 & 6/1/84) during a meeting with myself, Ed Rollins, Lee Atwater and Jim Lake, and then myself and the Tuesday Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Scorecard 109Th Congress 2 0 0 5 - 2006
    IRANIAN AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE Congressional Scorecard 109th Congress 2 0 0 5 - 2006 Please visit us on the web at www.iranianamericanpac.org About IAPAC IAPAC is a registered bipartisan political action committee that contributes to candidates for public office who are attuned to the domestic concerns of the Iranian American community. IAPAC focuses exclusively on domestic policy issues such as civil rights and immigration, and it encourages Americans of Iranian descent to actively participate in civic affairs. Mission • To support and promote the election of candidates for federal, state and local office, regardless of party affiliation, who are attuned to the domestic needs and issues of the Iranian American community • To support and promote Iranian American participation in civic affairs Issue Advocacy Civil Liberties: Balancing Civil Liberties and National Security in the Post-9/11 Era. Protecting our security and ensuring that the government does not infringe upon basic constitutional rights have long been important issues for civil libertarians and certain ethnic communities. IAPAC believes that our government must take the appropriate measures to protect our nation from further atrocities, but that it can do so without eliminating basic constitutional rights. Immigration: Immigration reform that is driven by proper national security concerns and remedies based on a fair and accurate appraisal of deficiencies in the immigration process, and not simply on national origin. Specifically, IAPAC advocates for a fair and measured execution of federal regulations governing the issuance of non-immigrant and immigrant visas for Iranian nationals. Congressional Scorecard The IAPAC 2005-2006 Congressional Scorecard rates members of Congress on votes and other positions taken in the House of Representatives and the Senate in the 109th Congress, which affect the domestic needs of the Iranian American community.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Civil Rights Day Booklet
    Advancing Civil Rights Through Advocacy The Governor’s 12th Annual Civil Rights Day Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:00 AM at the Beni Kedem Shrine Temple 100 Quarrier Street Charleston, WV 25301 Sponsored by: State of West Virginia Office of the Governor State of West Virginia Human Rights Commission PROGRAMPROGRAM HONOREES ENTRANCE PLEASE SSTAND FOR THE PPOSTING OF THE CCOLORS, HONOREES, AND PPLEDGE OF AALLEGIANCE Invocation: Rev. Wesley Dobbs, Commissioner Remain Standing WV Human Rights Commission Welcome and Occasion: Rev. Darrell Cummings, Chair WV Human Rights Commission Greetings and The Honorable Earl Ray Tomblin Presentation of Proclamation: Governor, State of West Virginia Historical Overview: Letari D. Thompson, Pastor Metropolitan Missionary Baptist Church Musical Selection: Rev. B. J. Roberts, Pastor Kingdom Life Fellowship Church Introduction of Honorees: Karen L. Bowling, Cabinet Secretary WV Department of Health and Human Resources Violin Selection: Stephen Spottswood, Conductor Urban Strings Youth Orchestra Columbus, Ohio Introduction of Honorees: Dr. Carolyn Stuart, Executive Director Herbert Henderson Office of Minority Affairs Office of the Governor 1 PROGRAMPROGRAM Poetry Selection: Crystal Goode, Poet Founder, CEO at Mixxed Media Introduction of Honorees: Dr. Bob Harrison Spiritual Director WV Institute for Spirituality Musical Selection: Rev. Donte Jackson, Pastor First Baptist Church Huntington, WV Introduction of Honorees: Josh Chaffin, Investigator II WV Human Rights Commission ~ Special PresentationS ~ Marykaye
    [Show full text]
  • American Governmentamerican American Government
    American Government American Government Orange Grove Texts Plus seeks to redefine publishing in an electronic world. a joint venture of the University Press of Florida and The Orange Grove, Florida’s digital repository, this collaboration provides faculty, students, and researchers worldwide with the latest scholarship and course materials in a twenty- first-century format that is readily discoverable, easily customizable, and consistently affordable. www.theorangegrove.org Lenz and H Timothy O. Lenz O and Mirya Holman LM a n ISBN 978-1-61610-163-3 American Government University Press of Florida Florida A&M University, Tallahassee Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers Florida International University, Miami Florida State University, Tallahassee New College of Florida, Sarasota University of Central Florida, Orlando University of Florida, Gainesville University of North Florida, Jacksonville University of South Florida, Tampa University of West Florida, Pensacola orange grove text plus American Government Timothy O. Lenz and Mirya Holman Florida Atlantic University Department of Political Science University Press of Florida Gainesville · Tallahassee · Tampa · Boca Raton Pensacola · Orlando · Miami · Jacksonville · Ft. Myers · Sarasota Copyright 2013 by the Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees on behalf of the Florida Atlantic University Department of Political Science This work is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. You are free to electronically copy, distribute, and transmit this work if you attribute authorship. However, all printing rights are reserved by the University Press of Florida (http:// www.upf.com).
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS
    OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/08/2016 Source: State Elections Offices* SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE ELECTORAL ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR VOTES JOSEPH R. BIDEN (D) DONALD J. TRUMP (R) AL 9 9 AK 3 3 AZ 11 11 AR 6 6 CA 55 55 CO 9 9 CT 7 7 DE 3 3 DC 3 3 FL 29 29 GA 16 16 HI 4 4 ID 4 4 IL 20 20 IN 11 11 IA 6 6 KS 6 6 KY 8 8 LA 8 8 ME 4 3 1 MD 10 10 MA 11 11 MI 16 16 MN 10 10 MS 6 6 MO 10 10 MT 3 3 NE 5 1 4 NV 6 6 NH 4 4 NJ 14 14 NM 5 5 NY 29 29 NC 15 15 ND 3 3 OH 18 18 OK 7 7 OR 7 7 PA 20 20 RI 4 4 SC 9 9 SD 3 3 TN 11 11 TX 38 38 UT 6 6 VT 3 3 VA 13 13 WA 12 12 WV 5 5 WI 10 10 WY 3 3 Total: 538 306 232 Total Electoral Votes Needed to Win = 270 - Page 1 of 12 - OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE BIDEN BLANKENSHIP BODDIE CARROLL CHARLES AL 849,624 AK 153,778 1,127 AZ 1,672,143 13 AR 423,932 2,108 1,713 CA 11,110,250 2,605 559 CO 1,804,352 5,061 2,515 2,011 CT 1,080,831 219 11 DE 296,268 1 87 8 DC 317,323 FL 5,297,045 3,902 854 GA 2,473,633 61 8 701 65 HI 366,130 931 ID 287,021 1,886 163 IL 3,471,915 18 9,548 75 IN 1,242,416 895 IA 759,061 1,707 KS 570,323 KY 772,474 7 408 43 LA 856,034 860 1,125 2,497 ME 435,072 MD 1,985,023 4 795 30 MA 2,382,202 MI 2,804,040 7,235 963 MN 1,717,077 75 1,037 112 MS 539,398 1,279 1,161 MO 1,253,014 3,919 664 MT 244,786 23 NE 374,583 NV 703,486 3,138 NH 424,937
    [Show full text]