Ellen L. Weintraub
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012
Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Jennifer E. Manning Information Research Specialist Colleen J. Shogan Deputy Director and Senior Specialist November 26, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Summary Ninety-four women currently serve in the 112th Congress: 77 in the House (53 Democrats and 24 Republicans) and 17 in the Senate (12 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Ninety-two women were initially sworn in to the 112th Congress, two women Democratic House Members have since resigned, and four others have been elected. This number (94) is lower than the record number of 95 women who were initially elected to the 111th Congress. The first woman elected to Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943). The first woman to serve in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA). She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 278 women have served in Congress, 178 Democrats and 100 Republicans. Of these women, 239 (153 Democrats, 86 Republicans) have served only in the House of Representatives; 31 (19 Democrats, 12 Republicans) have served only in the Senate; and 8 (6 Democrats, 2 Republicans) have served in both houses. These figures include one non-voting Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Currently serving Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress with 35 years (10 of which were spent in the House). -
Public Asked to Debate on Student Governm.Ent
1 Vol. XLl¥, No. ~ :2-'0 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON, D. C. Thursday, March 19, 1964 ~( Founclation Leacler Public Asked to Debate Announces Seniors Founders' Ceremony On Student Governm.ent Receiving "Wilsons" Will Present Degrees Sir Hugh Taylor, president The Philodemic Society is of the Woodrow Wilson Fel holding an open public debate lowship Foundation, has an tonight in Gaston Hall at 7 :30 nounced that five Georgetown on the status of the George seniors were appointed for town University student body first year graduate study next and its student government fall and three others were named concerning their failure "to con as alternates. tribute in full measure" to Uni The Georgetown winners are Ed versity life. ward P. Brynn, School of Foreign The text of the resolution, which Service; Edward B. Fallon, Larry was drafted by the Philodemic in F. Field, and Bruce M. Flattery, quiry committee led by Don Col College of Arts and Sciences; and leton (C '64) and will be read at James J. Lake, Institute of Lan the outset of this evening's session, guages and Linguistics. Those re reads as follows: ceiving honorable mention were "Whereas the Philodemic Debat Barbara A. Bitzer and Dorothy P. ing Society recognizes that it is Helm of the Institute, and Thomas the intention of the Administra M. Tebrow of the College. tion, the Faculty, and the Student Woodrow Wilson Fellowships Body to realize the full potential are awarded annually to under graduate students interested in MA YNARD HUTCHINS HYMAN G. RICK OVER DON COLLETON . of Georgetown University as one L of the great universities of the graduate studies and who ultimate II United States, and as America's ly wish to become college profes by John Kealy I] Student Mllg Assumes leading Catholic University; and sors. -
The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964
THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution: -
2006 Primary Election, Official Results
JUNE 6, 2006 2006 PRIMARY ELECTION OFFICIAL RESULTS United States Representative District 1 - Democrat BRUCE BRALEY RICK DICKINSON BILL GLUBA DENNY HEATH Scattering Totals Black Hawk 4223 919 855 213 8 6218 Bremer 502 239 199 35 1 976 Buchanan 577 329 362 54 0 1322 Butler 236 92 107 24 2 461 Clayton 319 385 238 53 1 996 Clinton 453 569 407 277 2 1708 Delaware 204 168 193 15 0 580 Dubuque 1074 4531 1723 119 4 7451 Fayette 363 352 231 66 1 1013 Jackson 190 1740 213 37 0 2180 Jones 262 209 309 26 1 807 Scott 2086 438 2616 242 3 5385 Total 10489 9971 7453 1161 23 29097 United States Representative District 1 - Republican BILL DIX BRIAN KENNEDY MIKE WHALEN Scattering Totals Black Hawk 1815 629 1581 1 4026 Bremer 1182 83 212 1 1478 Buchanan 346 131 327 0 804 Butler 1468 100 177 0 1745 Clayton 297 104 250 0 651 Clinton 347 180 747 1 1275 Delaware 241 104 228 0 573 Dubuque 630 448 810 3 1891 Fayette 371 85 349 0 805 Jackson 105 56 243 0 404 Jones 176 77 279 0 532 Scott 1505 1175 5774 16 8470 Total 8483 3172 10977 22 22654 JUNE 6, 2006 2006 PRIMARY ELECTION OFFICIAL RESULTS United States Representative District 2 - Democrat DAVE LOEBSACK WRITE-IN Scattering Totals Appanoose 2 1 3 Cedar 11 13 24 Davis 0 9 9 Des Moines 0 114 114 Henry 0 18 18 Jefferson 26 16 42 Johnson 235 341 576 Lee 6 46 52 Linn 195 258 453 Louisa 0 6 6 Muscatine 20 21 41 Van Buren 0 6 6 Wapello 0 78 78 Washington 12 8 20 Wayne 0 1 1 Total 501 936 1437 United States Representative District 2 - Republican JAMES A. -
2014 | 2015 CONTENTS ABOUT the ABOUT EAGLETON Eagleton Institute of Politics
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY Eagleton Institute of Politics 2014 | 2015 CONTENTS ABOUT THE ABOUT EAGLETON Eagleton Institute of Politics HE EAGLETON INSTITUTE OF POLITICS EXPLORES STATE AND NATIONAL POLITICS 1 through research, education, and public service, linking the study of politics with its day-to-dayT practice. Th e Institute focuses att ention on how the American political system MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR works, how it changes, and how it might work bett er. 2 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 8 RESEARCH CENTERS AND PROGRAMS 16 PUBLIC PROGRAMS Wood Lawn, home of the Eagleton Institute of Politics 20 EAGLETON’S FACULTY, CENTERS AND PROGRAMS SPECIALIZE IN THE STUDY OF: ■ state legislatures and governors; DONORS ■ public opinion polling and survey research; ■ women’s political participation; ■ minority and immigrant political behavior; 22 ■ campaigns, elections and political parties; ■ ethics; ALUMNI, FACULTY, STAFF AND ■ civic education and political engagement; VISITING ASSOCIATES ■ young elected leaders and youth political participation; ■ science and politics; ■ New Jersey politics. Back Cover Th e Institute includes the Center for American Women and Politics, the Eagleton Cen- EAGLETON ONLINE ter for Public Interest Polling, and the Center on the American Governor. Eagleton also houses the Cliff ord P. Case Professorship of Public Aff airs, the Arthur J. Holland Program on Ethics in Government, the Louis J. Gambaccini Civic Engagement Series, the Senator Wynona Lipman Chair in Women’s Political Leadership, and the Albert W. Lewitt En- dowed Lecture. For Rutgers undergraduate and graduate students, Eagleton off ers a range of education programs including an undergraduate certifi cate, graduate fellowships, research assistant- ships and internships, and opportunities to interact with political practitioners. -
ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� -
Iowa City, Iowa - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 NEWS
THE INDEPENDENT DAILY NEWSPAPER FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COMMUNITY SINCE 1868 The Daily Iowan TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2006 WWW.DAILYIOWAN.COM 50¢ LAVALLEE’S CRÊPES Hoping to govern WHERE TO VOTE CANDIDATES Polls for today’s primary elections will open at 7 a.m. and close at 9 p.m. To be eligible, voters must be affiliated with either the Democratic or Republican Parties or register with either at their polling places, which can be found by accessing http://www.johnson-county.com/audi- tor/lst_precinctPublicEntry.cfm. Voters are eligible to vote only for candidates from their registered party. Today’s winners will repre- sent their respective parties in the Nov. 7 general election. MIKE BLOUIN CHET CULVER ED FALLON Blouin graduated from Culver, the son of Fallon graduated from Dubuque’s Loras College former U.S. Sen. John Drake University with a with a degree in political Culver, graduated from degree in religion in science in 1966. After a Virginia Tech University 1986. He was elected to stint as a teacher in with a B.A. in political the Iowa House of Dubuque, he was elected science in 1988 and a Representatives in to the Iowa Legislature at master’s from Drake in 1992, and he is age 22, followed by two 1994 before teaching currently serving his terms in the U.S. House. high school in Des seventh-consecutive BACKGROUND He later worked in the Moines for four years. term. Fallon is the Carter administration, and Culver was elected executive director and he most recently served Iowa’s secretary of co-founder of 1,000 as the director of the State in 1998; his Friends of Iowa, an Iowa Department of second term will expire organization promoting Economic Development. -
Gone Rogue: Time to Reform the Presidential Primary Debates
Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series #D-67, January 2012 Gone Rogue: Time to Reform the Presidential Primary Debates by Mark McKinnon Shorenstein Center Reidy Fellow, Fall 2011 Political Communications Strategist Vice Chairman Hill+Knowlton Strategies Research Assistant: Sacha Feinman © 2012 President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. How would the course of history been altered had P.T. Barnum moderated the famed Lincoln-Douglas debates in 1858? Today’s ultimate showman and on-again, off-again presidential candidate Donald Trump invited the Republican presidential primary contenders to a debate he planned to moderate and broadcast over the Christmas holidays. One of a record 30 such debates and forums held or scheduled between May 2011 and March 2012, this, more than any of the previous debates, had the potential to be an embarrassing debacle. Trump “could do a lot of damage to somebody,” said Karl Rove, the architect of President George W. Bush’s 2000 and 2004 campaigns, in an interview with Greta Van Susteren of Fox News. “And I suspect it’s not going to be to the candidate that he’s leaning towards. This is a man who says himself that he is going to run— potentially run—for the president of the United States starting next May. Why do we have that person moderating a debate?” 1 Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the 2008 Republican nominee for president, also reacted: “I guarantee you, there are too many debates and we have lost the focus on what the candidates’ vision for America is.. -
Cultural Convergence Insights Into the Behavior of Misinformation Networks on Twitter
Cultural Convergence Insights into the behavior of misinformation networks on Twitter Liz McQuillan, Erin McAweeney, Alicia Bargar, Alex Ruch Graphika, Inc. {[email protected]} Abstract Crocco et al., 2002) – from tearing down 5G infrastructure based on a conspiracy theory (Chan How can the birth and evolution of ideas and et al., 2020) to ingesting harmful substances communities in a network be studied over misrepresented as “miracle cures” (O’Laughlin, time? We use a multimodal pipeline, 2020). Continuous downplaying of the virus by consisting of network mapping, topic influential people likely contributed to the modeling, bridging centrality, and divergence climbing US mortality and morbidity rate early in to analyze Twitter data surrounding the the year (Bursztyn et al., 2020). COVID-19 pandemic. We use network Disinformation researchers have noted this mapping to detect accounts creating content surrounding COVID-19, then Latent unprecedented ‘infodemic’ (Smith et al., 2020) Dirichlet Allocation to extract topics, and and confluence of narratives. Understanding how bridging centrality to identify topical and actors shape information through networks, non-topical bridges, before examining the particularly during crises like COVID-19, may distribution of each topic and bridge over enable health experts to provide updates and fact- time and applying Jensen-Shannon checking resources more effectively. Common divergence of topic distributions to show approaches to this, like tracking the volume of communities that are converging in their indicators like hashtags, fail to assess deeper topical narratives. ideologies shared between communities or how those ideologies spread to culturally distant 1 Introduction communities. In contrast, our multimodal analysis combines network science and natural language The COVID-19 pandemic fostered an processing to analyze the evolution of semantic, information ecosystem rife with health mis- and user-generated, content about COVID-19 over disinformation. -
The Trump Presidency, Journalism, and Democracy
The Trump Presidency, Journalism, and Democracy Edited by Robert E. Gutsche, Jr. First published 2018 ISBN 13:978-1-138-30738-4 (hbk) ISBN 13:978-1-315-14232-6 (ebk) Chapter 7 The Hell that Black People Live Trump’s Reports to Journalists on Urban Conditions Carolyn Guniss CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 7 The Hell that Black People Live Trump’s Reports to Journalists on Urban Conditions Carolyn Guniss It’s February 16, 2017. Donald J. Trump has been in the White House as Commander-in-Chief for just about a month. Trump holds a press conference to announce that he had nominated Alexander Acosta, a Hispanic man, as the U.S. Secretary of Labor. He uses the moment to update Americans about the “mess at home and abroad” that he inherited. He also took questions from journalists at his first press conference as president. Trump takes a question from April Ryan, a veteran White House cor- respondent for American Urban Radio Networks. She has been in that role since 1997, is in the process of covering her fourth U.S. president, and serves as the radio network’s Washington, D.C. bureau chief. Standing about midpoint, to the left of the room for the viewers, she signals to Trump that she wants to ask a question. Trump does what he does best when dealing with people of color: He finds a way to offend Ryan. “Yes, oh, this is going to be a bad question, but that’s OK,” he said. It is unclear what Trump meant by the statement, but whatever he meant, it wasn’t positive. -
Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep. -
Does American Democracy Still Work?
Does American Democracy Still Work? Does American Democracy Still Work? ?ALAN WOLFE Yale University Press New Haven and London The Future of American Democracy series aims to examine, sustain, and renew the historic vision of American democracy in a series of books by some of America’s foremost thinkers. The books in the series present a new, balanced, centrist approach to examining the challenges American democracy has faced in the past and must overcome in the years ahead. Series editor: Norton Garfinkle. Copyright © 2006 by Alan Wolfe. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Set in Minion type by Integrated Publishing Solutions, Grand Rapids, Michigan. Printed in the United States of America by R. R. Donnelley, Harrisonburg, Virginia. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wolfe, Alan, 1942– Does American democracy still work? / Alan Wolfe. p. cm.—(The future of American democracy) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-300-10859-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-300-10859-1 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Democracy—United States. 2. United States—Politics and government. I. Title. II. Series JK1726.W65 2006 320.973—dc22 2006008116 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources.