DOCSLIB.ORG

Notes Du Mont Royal ←

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notes Du Mont Royal ← Notes du mont Royal www.notesdumontroyal.com 쐰 Cette œuvre est hébergée sur « No- tes du mont Royal » dans le cadre d’un exposé gratuit sur la littérature. SOURCE DES IMAGES Google Livres CUM» VERSIÛNE LATÏENA HÜGŒNËË QËŒËÏJÜÏ ’ EDITAE .AB ritiERoNYMo DE B o S CH TÛMUS TERTIUS. ë ULTRAJECîrrE TYPOGRAPHIABWILD&JHÀLTHEER, Mi) CCXCVIH. f) I Il &W V 2’ L A] L...»z l (J h 4 ( iK l r] z]l 1 . J l ’27 . a , j , CORNELIO VAN LENNEP ET, DANIELI HOOFT ’AMICIS S. D. HIERO’NY’MUS DE BOSCH. , aguumfime 69’ prueelurum "amen (miaula efl , de que: quidjudicuyeriut multi abêti ê? jupientes yiri, memoriue proa ditum efl. Horum bene disputuudi facultutem admirante: vos .etium’ , tutu domij uut in hortisuua esfetuus, de eu re, quue mua Il: opportunitutibus ubuudubut ,l fuepius uoflro moelo filïflll! locuti; quou’ quidem eo lubeutius faciebumut , quantum tu fum- Mu familiaritute ejus fruèïus cuperemus uberrimos. Inter alunes uutem, qui de amicltltt commentuti finet, auc- tores nabis fizmper ante ovulas yetfizbutur dirham illud M T. Ciceronis lugenium, qui fitb petfimu Luelii itu de eu tafia- fuit, ut uuus emultis à? qmicithe plut intellexifi), utque eju: ubertutem de uec’esfitutem allie expafitijje, fit habitus. flues rem infixe; autrui: fitmmi dicenu’i mugiflri prueeeptu, qui hic nihil fiâum, nihilfîmulutum, fez! quidqulu’ eflèt, azerum 6’ aza- lunturz’um eflè yolebut, qui, quad pet? totem difioututiotzem maxime urguet, m’fi in bonis amicz’tium efle non poflè jeu- TOM. 11L Î* ries tiebat, qui denique, ut omnia(Il) ejus incommoda perfpeéia baba bat, non minus adyeifits en, 69’ quae bic nonnunquain ex oriri filent diflidia, ut prudenttflinzus medicus, fiilutaria ad. modum adbibuit remedia. Et tamen, cum nuper ad aras de bac re aliquid fcribere 3’6llem, atque en cogitatione Ciceronis libellum de amicitia ac- curate relegerem , nefcio quid magnas ille air fcribendique artifex egregius ne! omzfiflè ne! [alter]: non fatis diligenter ex- plicasfiz, mibi uiflzs efl; Scipionis quidem fententiam , qui dicere filebat, nibil dtficilius efle, quam amicitiam ad ex- tremum uitae permanere, optime refellit, non lis axera utitur rationibus, quibus id fiilum confici pojje vexidimamus, 699 in quibus noflra [altem amicitia jamduduin placide acquietit. lnciduntfiine faepe tempora, qualia naflra aetas plus fè- mel yidit, Mil ut amici de republica non idem fentiant, val ut interyenientibus cauflis ipfiirum uoluntates ac mores inulin- tentur atque ad alla jiudia, quam in quibus antea safari filebant, ipfi nonnunquam transferantur. Unde quideui ali- qua opinionum dzflenfio , non sera animoruui disjunflia inter nieras à” perfetios amicos enafci potejl. dt Cicera, qui in adminijiratione reipublicae atque inde gloriam confequendi yoluptate mania ponebnt, in (Illllclilfl yo- luntatum, fludiorum ac jèntentiarutn disfltfionem nuais ae- gre tulzflè videtur, atque illud, quad ad probitutem ac trir- tutem, optima: 65° unicas omnis lianefli amaris conciliatrices, tantum pertineret, etiam aliis rebus adflmxiflè , 69’ quidam diuerfis ifiis rationibus , quas probi uiri 65° ululai in ardi- uando reipublicae fiatu fe nonnunquarn fequi atque amplcâ’i debere arbitrantur , quad , me judice , cui reipublicae jalus non minori curae efl, quant optima civique, fieri non apartct; quoniam hic, ficuti pleraque mortaliuuz, cauli’liufaepiux incer- ta faut, à? ipfi) tefle (T) Cicerone, ad novas cujus tequmw, novarum confi’liorum rationes acconnnoduutur; quipo niai! quidquani amicitia adinittit. In cujus, tuelz’arilzus certi- oribus ornatae fiibfidiis, jiuwlfliruo au, quid fit teuzpora con. fidere eorumque rationes ad yoluutates uoflras accammadare, plane ignota res efl, se! fulteui un debot. Non inutile autant erit, (1) Pro Lege Manil. cap. no. (Il!) ’ erit, banc nojira’in fententiam exemplo. ab bac loco non pie. ne alieno, illufirare. I Heu-ra..-www" D. Heinfius, vir erziditi’flimus. vivebat cum HUGONE GRO- T10 conjunâ’iflime 69° quaois data occajione erat illius virtu. mon praedicator celeberrimus: Cam itaque auna 1603. He- jiodum ederet, etiam in Graeco carmine GROTII amicitiam ai. que doctrinam fitmmis laudibus. elferre non dubitaoit: je. queutibus niera temporibus ouin Heinfius alternai Hefiodi edi- tianem in lucem proferret, 69° a GROTIO de republica diflën- tiret, ea nerba, quae GROTII laudes continerent, ejecit; quant rem ita enarrat praefiantiflimus quêter fia. Alb. Fabricius. (1-) ,, Penultimus in appendice bymni verfus ,,.u.n... ,, prrtoîâav 13’ épinoit , (fafiot: ëziyoç dieu êa’vre, .- ... 1’ .2.p... ;,- omisfus ejl in editione Heinjiana" 1622 in Odin ,, ne , poli Synodum Dordracenam edita,” (etiani in aliis recentioribus) quad Heinfius non audaret tan- tis laudibas madare nomen HUGONIS GROTII , loua 1 datiflimum profeâ’0, fedpraevalentibus tum in Belgia .,.....f« . auna-vu a..." ( - .. partibusVidemus Heinfii invzfum. inbecillitatein animiq , , lqui q rebus , V dubiis l je non auderet profiteri amicum iflius uiri, quo nec dattior ned . -. «un. un. melior vixit unquain. Sed illud’tempori condonandum forte nonnulli putabunt, neque in en re eflè ullam infifii animi flgnifi- cationem. Forum enim uero non bis continetur finibus, latius’ bac, fi quanda eruperit, jerpit malzim, atque omnem jucundi- totem ac honejlatem ex hammam vita tollit. Quid enim turpius ac mugis jejunum excogitart potefl, quant propter quoddam’ reipublicae bene gerendae fludium, quo hie ê? ille libertatem tueri patriaeque commodis je infèruire opinanturt 69’ penes quem fit oeritas in tantis animorum perturbationibus 66° re- rum ciyilium fluoiibus diflicile admodum efi intelleéiu, fanc- tiflimum nomen amicitiae uioiare, inueteratas familiaritates non modo extinguere, fiad citant odia fufcipere jèmpiterna; (f) Bibi.I Gràec...2. -- cap. 8.. pali.a 383.. l fluo .-.-.a-.- - 4..-... .-.....-.....--.-- ;.... -... .- -...- .- (1V) quad tamen nofîris temporibus non finie! faunin eflè ouin bon nis omnibus lugemus. Si jam tale quid accidere pofiit iis , qui levi admodum’ flint ingenio 65’ apud quos, ut ait T erentius, non bene rivi- tur, non fluide repugnamus: at fi quis ulterius progredi ata que de ornai animoruin conjunâione idem flatuipoflè exifli- -.q........... met, meo quidem judicio longe a neritate aberrai. Vos, amici, vos appello , qui in nofira patria rebus geren. dis non [bluta afl’uiflis , verum etiam praefuifiis , fi jam alias partes , quam ego, in republica fleuti eflètis, nain eo amicitia nofira minoribus fruâiibns redundaflet .9 non mul- tum [apere rideamur; fèd illad faitem naflris jiudiis à? yi- giliis confiecuti fumus, ut bene intelligamus, in bellis civili- bus ab utra ne parte, ficut olim, ita 6’ nunc, quam maxime peccari; figeum jblum un fartent, bonefium ac fapienteni ali- rum, qui dificiatos ciuiumanimos rurfiim conjungere, 69° ne- ,terem tranquillitatem ac ficuritatem reipublicae reddere poflit. Quatre baec temporum intervalle; aut partium jiudia aut for- tunae iudibria aequo minus oaiebant ad mutuam nofirain no- lnntateni interrumpendain, ne dicain, tollendam, quam fiquis nofirum aliam neftem indueret, aut alio cibi qui potionis ge- nere quam antea delebtaretur. In eain igitur cogitationem neni , ut nojira amicitia, jan: par triginta fere aimas non ullis rentai uiciflîtudinibus, ne- que temparuni ratianibus obnoxia, non ullis commodis aut in- commodis a fia) primo [piendore quidquam imniutata, longe aliis 6’ firmioribus, quam quae Cicero commenzoraw’t, nite- retur fundamentis. Quae dam quaero , flatiin ultra nabi occurrit quaedam perfitajio aut potins caria opinio, nibii a nabis invicem in]? ab optima anima poflb praficifci; adeo ut, fi quidquam yitii aut labis jam emergere nideretur , cujus nemo immunis efi, protinus ad illud ejasdern Ciceranis con- fugeremus praeceptnm,(1-) quo manet, non niai cant perfiâ’is bominibus plenequejapientibus, jèd cula iis, in quibus prac- clare agitur , filant [imnlacra virtutis. Quae quidem opinio ,- prima bora contraiiae nofirae confletudinis fnfcepta, Iongo rerum ufu confirniata, bodie tain alias apud nos egit radias, ut quiquia’ acciderit, mon mali bina tintendiun fit. T ou (t) De ofliciie Libr. x. cap. 1:. (v3 Tata prias naiurae nofi’rae indoles connntatur, nique, in ita dicam, transformetur nece e efl, quam fi en, qua fumus aetate, alla res intercedere po It, quote de prifiina nofira be- .îeV-. nenolentia au quidquam limet au: detrabat : [tique bac patio non moda [pas afidget fore, ut ad extremum vitae, quad tain difiïcile efiîe olim exifiimabat Scipio, futuri fimus amici ; féal certifimam rem .eflè plane denuntio. A Quarto, fi idem Scipio fitae, quam cum Laelio contraxerat, familiaritatis memoriam jèmpiternam 69’ ipfipofieritati notam. fore defideraret; Ego, qui non minores quam sapin aut Lac:- lius glarior habere arnicas ,I finerem tria amicorum , quales in omni antiquitate aux inv’eniuntur, nomina ignota eflèpofieris? nunquamprofebio illud, quo fèmper erga vos fui anima ,patiar. Sed quis ego au? fi quid feripfèrim, qu’odforte nofiroruui bominum auribus placuerit, an id ad cognitionem pofieritatis perventurum fit, amniuo incertum efl ; alia igitur erat inve- nienda nia , qua illud, quad tantopere cupèrem , praefiare poflem 63” quad per me minus liceret, id per fummum virant HUGONEM GROTIUM efiêbium redderem. Neque in en re me fiuflrabitur floes: nemo enim efl, qui dubitet, quia Gno- TIANI ingenii frubius etiam admiratura fit pofieritas , 63’ iis additura monumentis, quae olim Graeci 69’ Romani relique- .â. a. -.....r runt , cum iis ne! inventionis gloria, ne! accuratae doârinae diligentia , ne! bonarum rerum copia, ne! denique [anima firipturae elegantia ac
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seriously Playful: Philosophy in the Myths of Ovid's Metamorphoses
    Seriously Playful: Philosophy in the Myths of Ovid’s Metamorphoses Megan Beasley, B.A. (Hons) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Classics of The University of Western Australia School of Humanities Discipline of Classics and Ancient History 2012 1 2 For my parents 3 4 Abstract This thesis aims to lay to rest arguments about whether Ovid is or is not a philosophical poet in the Metamorphoses. It does so by differentiating between philosophical poets and poetic philosophers; the former write poetry freighted with philosophical discourse while the latter write philosophy in a poetic medium. Ovid, it is argued, should be categorised as a philosophical poet, who infuses philosophical ideas from various schools into the Metamorphoses, producing a poem that, all told, neither expounds nor attacks any given philosophical school, but rather uses philosophy to imbue its constituent myths with greater wit, poignancy and psychological realism. Myth and philosophy are interwoven so intricately that it is impossible to separate them without doing violence to Ovid’s poem. It is not argued here that the Metamorphoses is a fundamentally serious poem which is enhanced, or marred, by occasional playfulness. Nor is it argued that the poem is fundamentally playful with occasional moments of dignity and high seriousness. Rather, the approach taken here assumes that seriousness and playfulness are so closely connected in the Metamorphoses that they are in fact the same thing. Four major myths from the Metamorphoses are studied here, from structurally significant points in the poem. The “Cosmogony” and the “Speech of Pythagoras” at the beginning and end of the poem have long been recognised as drawing on philosophy, and discussion of these two myths forms the beginning and end of the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Consolations of Death in Ancient Greek Literature
    $B 44 125 The Consolations of Death In Ancient Greek Literature By SISTER MARY EVARISTUS, MA. of THE SISTERS OF CHABITY, HALIFAX, N. S. A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Catholic Sisters College of the Catholic University of America in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from Microsoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/consolationsofdeOOmorarich The Consolations of Death In Ancient Greek Literature SISTER MARY EVARISTUS, M.A. of THE SISTERS OF CHARITY, HALIFAX, N. S. A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Catholic Sisters College of the Cathoh University of America in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy NA.ICXAI SA'.TAL PICS' 'MC , WA'iUNOTON, D. C. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 7 CHAPTER I The Inevitableness of Death 10 Universality of death a motive for consolation. Views of death in Homer. Homeric epithets for death. No power can ward off death. Consolation afforded by the thought that it cannot come before the appointed time. Inevitableness of death as depicted in the Lyric Poets, * Tragedians, Plato, Lysias, Apollonius Rhodius, ps.- Plutarch, Plutarch. CHAPTER II Others Have Had to Die 19 Treatment of t&kos in Homer, ov <roi /xopoj. Tragic Poets, Plutarch, ps.-Plutarch. Examples of those who have borne sufferings nobly. Extension of t&kos. Even better men have died. CHAPTER III Death the Payment of a Debt to Nature 26 Should not complain when loan is claimed. Simonides of Ceos. Euripides. Plato. ps.-Plutarch. CHAPTER IV Death Not to be Regarded as Unexpected 28 Nothing ought to appear unexpected.
    [Show full text]
  • PHILOPOEMEN IMMODICUS and SUPERBUS and SPARTA the Decision Taken by the Achaean League in the Autumn of 192 B.G at Aegium To
    PHILOPOEMEN IMMODICUS AND SUPERBUS AND SPARTA The decision taken by the Achaean League in the autumn of 192 B.G at Aegium to wage war against the Aetolians and their allies was crucial to the Greeks and their future. Greece proper had been divided for generations among several political bodies — and, in fact, had never been united into one state. Yet all those known as Έλληνες felt the natural human desire to avoid the unnecessary violence, bloodshed, and self-destruction engendered by ceaseless competition for preeminence and hegemomy in the domestic arena. The so-called “Tragic Historians” adopted these emotions as the leitmotif of their principal efforts to delineate the deeds and omissions of the Greek leadership and populace.1 Rome’s powerful political-strategical penetration east of the Adriatic sea, into Mainland Greece, particularly during the later decades of the third century B.C, undermined the precarious balance of internal Greek politics. The embarrassment which had seized most of Greece is easily understandable. Yet the Achaeans at Aegium do not appear to have been inspired by the memory of their ancestors’ resistance to the Persians. The Achaean leaders, Philopoemen not excluded, rejected Aetolian pleas for help or, at least, non-intervention in the struggle that they had started in the name of Έλληνες for the whole of Greece. Somewhat surprisingly, the Achaean leaders hastened to declare war on the Aetolians, anticipating even the Roman crossing to Greece2. These are the bare facts available to us (Livy 35.50.2-6). However, the conventional interpretation of these occurrences derived from Polybius 3 tends to be pathetic more than historical, and consti­ tute an embellished portrait of Achaean policy and politicians of those days rather than an honest guide to the political realities of the Έλληνες and Greece proper.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 66-15,122 PIPER, Linda Jane, 1935- A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-146 B.C. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1966 History, ancient University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967 All Rights Reserved A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-1^6 B.C. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Linda Jane Piper, A.B., M.A. The Ohio State University 1966 Approved by Adviser Department of History PREFACE The history of Sparta from the death of Alexander in 323 B.C; to the destruction of Corinth in 1^6 B.C. is the history of social revolution and Sparta's second rise to military promi­ nence in the Peloponnesus; the history of kings and tyrants; the history of Sparta's struggle to remain autonomous in a period of amalgamation. It is also a period in Sparta's history too often neglected by historians both past and present. There is no monograph directly concerned with Hellenistic Sparta. For the most part, this period is briefly and only inci­ dentally covered in works dealing either with the whole history of ancient Sparta, or simply as a part of Hellenic or Hellenistic 1 2 history in toto. Both Pierre Roussel and Eug&ne Cavaignac, in their respective surveys of Spartan history, have written clear and concise chapters on the Hellenistic period. Because of the scope of their subject, however, they were forced to limit them­ selves to only the most important events and people of this time, and great gaps are left in between.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Latin Literature and Style Pursue in Greater Depth; (C) It Increases an Awareness of Style and Linguistic Structure
    An Introduction to Latin Literature and Style by Floyd L. Moreland Rita M. Fleischer revised by Andrew Keller Stephanie Russell Clement Dunbar The Latin/Greek Institute The City University ojNew York Introduction These materials have been prepared to fit the needs of the Summer Latin Institute of Brooklyn College and The City University of New York. and they are structured as an appropriate sequel to Moreland and Fleischer. Latin: An Intensive Course (University of California Press. 1974). However, students can use these materials with equal effectiveness after the completion of any basic grammar text and in any intermediate Latin course whose aim is to introduce students to a variety of authors of both prose and poetry. The materials are especially suited to an intensive or accelerated intermediate course. The authors firmly believe that, upon completion of a basic introduction to grammar. the only way to learn Latin well is to read as much as possible. A prime obstacle to reading is vocabulary: students spend much energy and time looking up the enormous number of words they do not know. Following the system used by Clyde Pharr in Vergil's Aeneid. Books I-VI (Heath. 1930), this problem is minimized by glossing unfamiliar words on each page oftext. Whether a word is familiar or not has been determined by its occurrence or omission in the formal unit vocabularies of Moreland and Fleischer, Latin: An Intensive Course. Students will need to know the words included in the vocabularies of that text and be acquainted with some of the basic principles of word formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Euripides and Gender: the Difference the Fragments Make
    Euripides and Gender: The Difference the Fragments Make Melissa Karen Anne Funke A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: Ruby Blondell, Chair Deborah Kamen Olga Levaniouk Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics © Copyright 2013 Melissa Karen Anne Funke University of Washington Abstract Euripides and Gender: The Difference the Fragments Make Melissa Karen Anne Funke Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Ruby Blondell Department of Classics Research on gender in Greek tragedy has traditionally focused on the extant plays, with only sporadic recourse to discussion of the many fragmentary plays for which we have evidence. This project aims to perform an extensive study of the sixty-two fragmentary plays of Euripides in order to provide a picture of his presentation of gender that is as full as possible. Beginning with an overview of the history of the collection and transmission of the fragments and an introduction to the study of gender in tragedy and Euripides’ extant plays, this project takes up the contexts in which the fragments are found and the supplementary information on plot and character (known as testimonia) as a guide in its analysis of the fragments themselves. These contexts include the fifth- century CE anthology of Stobaeus, who preserved over one third of Euripides’ fragments, and other late antique sources such as Clement’s Miscellanies, Plutarch’s Moralia, and Athenaeus’ Deipnosophistae. The sections on testimonia investigate sources ranging from the mythographers Hyginus and Apollodorus to Apulian pottery to a group of papyrus hypotheses known as the “Tales from Euripides”, with a special focus on plot-type, especially the rape-and-recognition and Potiphar’s wife storylines.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikos Skoulikidis.Pdf
    The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry 59 Series Editors: Damià Barceló · Andrey G. Kostianoy Nikos Skoulikidis Elias Dimitriou Ioannis Karaouzas Editors The Rivers of Greece Evolution, Current Status and Perspectives The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Founded by Otto Hutzinger Editors-in-Chief: Damia Barcelo´ • Andrey G. Kostianoy Volume 59 Advisory Board: Jacob de Boer, Philippe Garrigues, Ji-Dong Gu, Kevin C. Jones, Thomas P. Knepper, Alice Newton, Donald L. Sparks More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/698 The Rivers of Greece Evolution, Current Status and Perspectives Volume Editors: Nikos Skoulikidis Á Elias Dimitriou Á Ioannis Karaouzas With contributions by F. Botsou Á N. Chrysoula Á E. Dimitriou Á A.N. Economou Á D. Hela Á N. Kamidis Á I. Karaouzas Á A. Koltsakidou Á I. Konstantinou Á P. Koundouri Á D. Lambropoulou Á L. Maria Á I.D. Mariolakos Á A. Mentzafou Á A. Papadopoulos Á D. Reppas Á M. Scoullos Á V. Skianis Á N. Skoulikidis Á M. Styllas Á G. Sylaios Á C. Theodoropoulos Á L. Vardakas Á S. Zogaris Editors Nikos Skoulikidis Elias Dimitriou Institute of Marine Biological Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters Resources and Inland Waters Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Anavissos, Greece Anavissos, Greece Ioannis Karaouzas Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters Hellenic Centre for Marine Research Anavissos, Greece ISSN 1867-979X ISSN 1616-864X (electronic) The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ISBN 978-3-662-55367-1 ISBN 978-3-662-55369-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55369-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017954950 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • A Commentary on Solon's Poems a Thesis Submitted for the Degree Of
    A Commentary on Solon's Poems A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Maria Noussia University College London February, 1999 BIET, LOIMOI1 ABSTRACT This dissertation is a Commentary on Solon's Poems (elegiacs and tetrameters; the iambic trimeters, though taken into consideration for the examination of the rest of the poems, are not given a detailed commentary). Solon's poetry is studied mainly from a literary point of view; it is compared with the language and vocabulary of his predecessors Homer, Hesiod, and the other lyric poets of his age. The study attests the influence of Solon's language, content, motives, and ethical / political ideas on his lyric successors, on Aristophanes and the tragedians (above all Euripides who specifically appears to share the ideology of the polls and the heightened consciousness about civic affairs which emerged in the Athenian community under Solon) as well as the coincidence between Solon's ethical statements and the topoi of the language of the inscriptions. This is not a historical Commentary; the connections of Solon's poetry with his Laws as well as with the historical situation of his time and the reforms he sponsored are taken into consideration only when they are useful and rewarding in the answers they provide for the interpretation of the Solonian poetry. The emphasis of this work is on Solon's poetry as a work of Literature and on Solon's poetic achievements. The close examination of his poems reveals his creativity, his artistry together with his view of the process of poetic composition as technical making and his focus on his craftsmanship as a tool for his profession as a politician and as a statesman.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY
    ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY EDITED BY RICHARD J.A.TALBERT London and New York First published 1985 by Croom Helm Ltd Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 1985 Richard J.A.Talbert and contributors All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Atlas of classical history. 1. History, Ancient—Maps I. Talbert, Richard J.A. 911.3 G3201.S2 ISBN 0-203-40535-8 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-71359-1 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-03463-9 (pbk) Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Also available CONTENTS Preface v Northern Greece, Macedonia and Thrace 32 Contributors vi The Eastern Aegean and the Asia Minor Equivalent Measurements vi Hinterland 33 Attica 34–5, 181 Maps: map and text page reference placed first, Classical Athens 35–6, 181 further reading reference second Roman Athens 35–6, 181 Halicarnassus 36, 181 The Mediterranean World: Physical 1 Miletus 37, 181 The Aegean in the Bronze Age 2–5, 179 Priene 37, 181 Troy 3, 179 Greek Sicily 38–9, 181 Knossos 3, 179 Syracuse 39, 181 Minoan Crete 4–5, 179 Akragas 40, 181 Mycenae 5, 179 Cyrene 40, 182 Mycenaean Greece 4–6, 179 Olympia 41, 182 Mainland Greece in the Homeric Poems 7–8, Greek Dialects c.
    [Show full text]
  • Fecunditas, Sterilitas, and the Politics of Reproduction at Rome Angela Grace
    FECUNDITAS, STERILITAS, AND THE POLITICS OF REPRODUCTION AT ROME ANGELA GRACE HUG A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO DECEMBER 2014 © ANGELA GRACE HUG, 2014 Abstract This dissertation is a cultural history of the role of human fertility – fecunditas – in Ancient Roman society c. 200 B.C. – A.D. 250. I ask how the Romans chose to understand human fertility, how they sought to preserve and encourage it, and how the absence of fertility affected their marriages, their families and their political careers. It is an investigation of the place of fertility in the Roman cultural consciousness. Using a wide range of sources – literary, epigraphic, papyrological, juridical, and numismatic – I argue that the Romans conceptualized fecunditas (fertility) not just as a generic female quality, but as one of the cardinal virtues that all married women were expected to embody. A woman’s fecunditas could be evaluated and judged according to how many children she bore, how often she became pregnant, and how many of her children survived into adulthood. Although fecunditas was constructed as a female responsibility, élite Roman men were able to take advantage of having a fertile wife. Official benefits, such as those accrued by law under the ius trium liberorum, the rights of three children, brought one level of honour. An élite man could also exploit the fecunditas of his wife to increase his own social capital. In return, women of proven fertility were thought to deserve conjugal loyalty from their husbands and ought not to be divorced.
    [Show full text]
  • Tito Livio Ab Urbe Condita II
    Tito Livio - Ab Urbe condita II Tito Livio Ab Urbe condita II a cura di Emilio Piccolo Classici Latini e Greci Senecio 1 Senecio: Classici Latini e Greci Classici Latini e Greci Senecio [email protected] Napoli, 2009 La manipolazione e/o la riproduzione (totale o parziale) e/o la diffusione telematica di quest’opera sono consentite a singoli o comunque a soggettinon costituiti come imprese di carattere editoriale, cinematografico o radio-televisivo. 2 Tito Livio - Ab Urbe condita II Tito Livio Ab Urbe condita II a cura di Emilio Piccolo Classici Latini e Greci Senecio 3 Senecio: Classici Latini e Greci 4 Tito Livio - Ab Urbe condita II LIBER XXVI [1] Cn. Fuluius Centumalus P. Sulpicius Galba consules cum idibus Martiis magistratum inissent, senatu in Capitolium uocato, de re publica, de administratione belli, de prouinciis exercitibusque patres consuluerunt. Q. Fuluio Ap. Claudio, prioris anni consulibus, prorogatum imperium est atque exercitus quos habebant decreti, adiectumque ne a Capua quam obsidebant abscederent priusquam expugnassent. ea tum cura maxime intentos habebat Romanos, non ab ira tantum, quae in nullam unquam ciuitatem iustior fuit, quam quod urbs tam nobilis ac potens, sicut defectione sua traxerat aliquot populos, ita recepta inclinatura rursus animos uidebatur ad ueteris imperii respectum. et praetoribus prioris anni M. Iunio in Etruria, P. Sempronio in Gallia cum binis legionibus quas habuerant prorogatum est imperium. prorogatum et M. Marcello, ut pro consule in Sicilia reliqua belli perficeret eo exercitu quem haberet: si supplemento opus esset, suppleret de legionibus quibus P. Cornelius pro praetore in Sicilia praeesset, dum ne quem militem legeret ex eo numero quibus senatus missionem reditumque in patriam negasset ante belli finem.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Phylogeography of the Cyprinid Fish Genus Pelasgus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) Fylogeneze a Fylogeografie Kaprovitých
    Charles University in Prague Faculty of Science Study program: Biology Study branch: Ecology Bc. Nuria Viñuela Rodríguez Phylogeny and phylogeography of the cyprinid fish genus Pelasgus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) Fylogeneze a fylogeografie kaprovitých ryb rodu Pelasgus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) Diploma Thesis Supervisor: RNDr. Jasna Vukićová, Ph.D. Prague, 2016 1 2 Declaration: I hereby declare that this diploma thesis is entirely the result of my own work and I have acknowledged all the sources of information which I have been used in it. This thesis has not been submitted in order to obtain the same or any other academic degree. In Prague, 15. 08. 2016 Signature 3 4 Acknowledgements My deepest gratitude to my supervisor, RNDr. Jasna Vukićová, Ph.D., who has supported and helped me during my period as master student, providing me with wise advices and knowledge, and who first opened the door of Charles University to me. I have been very lucky to have such an encouraging and caring supervisor and it has been a great pleasure being a student of hers. Secondly I would like to say thank you to Mgr. Radek Šanda, Ph.D. (National Museum, Prague) who firstly gave me the opportunity to learn the molecular methods in his laboratory and introduced me to the world of phylogeny and phylogenetic studies. Last but not least, I would like to thank my beloved parents, for supporting me in the adventure of studying abroad, for always encouraging me to do what I want and what I like, and for helping me to heal my homesick by bringing a piece of home whenever they visited me.
    [Show full text]