DOCSLIB.ORG

A Commentary on Solon's Poems a Thesis Submitted for the Degree Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Commentary on Solon's Poems a Thesis Submitted for the Degree Of A Commentary on Solon's Poems A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Maria Noussia University College London February, 1999 BIET, LOIMOI1 ABSTRACT This dissertation is a Commentary on Solon's Poems (elegiacs and tetrameters; the iambic trimeters, though taken into consideration for the examination of the rest of the poems, are not given a detailed commentary). Solon's poetry is studied mainly from a literary point of view; it is compared with the language and vocabulary of his predecessors Homer, Hesiod, and the other lyric poets of his age. The study attests the influence of Solon's language, content, motives, and ethical / political ideas on his lyric successors, on Aristophanes and the tragedians (above all Euripides who specifically appears to share the ideology of the polls and the heightened consciousness about civic affairs which emerged in the Athenian community under Solon) as well as the coincidence between Solon's ethical statements and the topoi of the language of the inscriptions. This is not a historical Commentary; the connections of Solon's poetry with his Laws as well as with the historical situation of his time and the reforms he sponsored are taken into consideration only when they are useful and rewarding in the answers they provide for the interpretation of the Solonian poetry. The emphasis of this work is on Solon's poetry as a work of Literature and on Solon's poetic achievements. The close examination of his poems reveals his creativity, his artistry together with his view of the process of poetic composition as technical making and his focus on his craftsmanship as a tool for his profession as a politician and as a statesman. 2 Table of Contents Title Page I Abstract 2 Table of Contents 3 Preface 5 Introduction 7 Fragment 1 G. -P. 2(13 W. 2) 11 Fragment 2 G. -P. 2(1-3 W. 2) 61 Fragment 3 G. -P. 2(4 W. 2) 73 Fragment 4 G. -P. 2(4a W. 2) 105 Fragment 5 G. -P. 2(4b-c W. 2) 109 Fragment 6 G. 2(15 W. 2) 113 -P. Fragment 7 G. -P. 2(5 W. 2) 117 Fragment 8 G. -P. 2(6 W. 2) 121 Fragment 9 G. -P. 2(7 W. 2) 123 Fragment 10 G. -P. 2(28 W. 2) 124 Fragment 11 G. -P. 2(19 W. 2) 126 Fragment 12 G. -P. 2(9 W. 2) 132 Fragment 13 G. -P. 2(12 W. 2) 137 Fragment 14 G. -P. 2(10 W. 2) 141 Fragment 15 G. -P. 2(11 W. 2) 145 Fragment 16 G. -P. 2(25 W. 2) 152 Fragment 17 G. -P. 2(23 W. 2) 155 Fragment 18 G. -P. 2(24 W. 2) 158 Fragment 19 G. -P. 2(14 W. 2) 167 Fragment 20 G. -P. 2(16 W. 2) 169 Fragment 21 G. -P. 2(17 W. 2) 171 Fragment 22 G. -P. 2(22a W. 2) 172 Fragment 23 G. -P. 2(27 W. 2) 177 Fragment 24 G. -P. 2(26 W. 2) 190 Fragment 25 G. -P. 2(29 W. 2) 191 Fragment 26 G. -P. 2(20 W. 2) 193 Fragment 27 G. -P. 2(21 W. 2) 197 Fragment 28 G. -P. 2(18 W. 2) 200 Fragment 29 G. -P. 2(32 W. 2) 202 Fragment 29a G. -P. 2(33 W. 2) 208 Fragment 29b G. -P. 2(34 W. 2) 213 Fragment °40 G. -P. 2(31 W. 2) 217 Bibliography 220 BLANK IN ORIGINAL Preface This dissertation on Solon's poetry is heavily indebted to a range of people: I am particularly grateful to my supervisor Prof. H. G. T. Maehler for his wise counsel and constant encouragement, his unfailing patience in reading and improving successive drafts of this Commentary, and, above all, for the sense of perspective he has provided me during the course of research and writing. I would like to thank Prof. S. Hornblower for his kind help and advice as well as for the criticism he generously provided which saved me from many errors. I have also been exceptionally fortunate in receiving the constructive criticisms and perceptive analyses of Prof. M. Fantuzzi while I was at the University of Florence as an Erasmus-student, and also afterwards in the later stages of my research. My work has also greatly profited from the comments and suggestions of Dr. E. Magnelli. Finally, I wish to thank my family whose love and support have meant a great deal to me. The Commentary is based on the text of Solon in Teubner Poetae elegiaci by B. Gentili and C. Prato, with some deviations. The editions of the ancient authors which have been followed are the standard ones, in most cases, (unless otherwise stated), the ones listed in L. Berkowitz and K. A. Squitier, Canon of Greek Authors and Works3 (but for the ancient elegiac authors Gentili-Prato's edition is followed). Most of the abbreviations used for ancient authors and collections of fragments or for the reference bibliography are the conventional ones, which can be found, for example, in the Oxford Classical Dictionary'. The abbreviations of the titles of journals are as in L'Annee philologique. 5 BLANK IN ORIGINAL Introduction It has been more than forty years since A. Masaracchia's book on Solon has appeared and eighty since I. M. Linforth's. Only one third of each book was devoted to a discussion of the Solonian poems: in spite of the wide range of material provided by Masaracchia and the generally good judgement shown by Linforth in relation to problems of interpretation arising out of Solon's poems, both books do not indeed focus enough on the literary features of Solon's text. Much more recently, the studies by O. Vox (1984) and by E. Katz Anhalt (1993) offered more careful literary interpretations of some of Solon's fragments. Vox and Anhalt approach Solon's poetry with great sensitivity: far from considering Solon's language? onventional, they well demonstrate how often Solon innovated within the archaic tradition to a remarkable degree, or resorted to refined forms of allusion to Homer or Hesiod. However, the good points of their contributions are overshadowed mainly by their limitations in structuring the material, as the selection and arrangement of it sometimes produces a sequential commentary on a single poem and sometimes a handling of a series of topics inside it. Neither are they interested in considering the specific context of each fragment or problems of their textual transmission. There is still a need, therefore, for a commentary on Solon's poems and for a fuller re-examination of their literary features. In fact, these often tended to be overshadowed by the other aspects of Solon's admittedly remarkable personality (Solon the wise man, Solon the traveller, Solon the legislator, Solon the statesman, Solon the political thinker). However, a close examination of the main body of his poetry (elegiacs and tetrameters) will reveal his creativity and artistry in as much as his own view of poetic composition as technical making and the strong interconnection between his 'profession' as a politician motivated by the concept of the community and his 'profession' as a poet, intending his poetry often, yet not only, as a more appealing form of advertisement and expression of his ethical or political thoughts. Indeed, Solon sought to create and use poetry for the needs of the polls as a whole, including all the members of it (rather than to exclude or to speak in favour of a faction, as in the poetry of Theognis or Alcaeus, for instance) and all the aspects of their life, considering as well the dimension of pleasures. It is precisely this non-exclusive function of his poetic ßoýiil and his consciousness about civic affairs which will be later appreciated by authors like Aristophanes or Euripides, imbued with the omnicomprehensive ideology of the polls. This Commentary does not specifically or systematically examine Solon's reception in late antiquity, but the fairly abounding fifth century parallels provide good instances of the reception and fortune of Solon's language and thought at an earlier age. 7 Solon's poems often appear vague or cryptic and this is certainly the case when one tries to find there detailed explanations or specific clarifications of his political career or reads them as an application of the historical situation and the crisis of his time as described by our principal, yet chronologically later, reconstructions of Aristotle's Athenaion Politeia and Plutarch's Solon. In this Commentary the connections of the poems with Solon's Laws and the historical background of Athens in his time are taken into consideration, especially when they are helpful to the intentionally) interpretation - and no-one ought to side-step (at least the thorny historic topics involved in them. However, this Commentary does not consider the poems as clues to political history, not only because this perspective has been prevailing in the only line-by-line modern commentary to Solon, namely that by Linforth, but even more because, on the present evidence, we have to admit that much has to remain disputable. For instance, the very words acladXOEla and EKT1 IopoL, which are a leitmotif of Aristotle's and Plutarch's explanations of Solon's political activity, are not found in the transmitted Solonian poems and, as a matter of fact, we do not have any reliable evidence for any reference to debt by Solon in connection with his reforms which is the hard-core of the most traditional (but still prevailing, though with exceptions) historical interpretations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Works Herodotus
    Swarthmore College Works Classics Faculty Works Classics 2013 Herodotus Rosaria Vignolo Munson Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-classics Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Rosaria Vignolo Munson. (2013). "Herodotus". Herodotus. Volume 1-2, https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-classics/42 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction I. HERODOTUS TODAY 1.1 In a review article called 'A Triumph for Herodotus', Peter Green largely attributes the resurgence of Herodotean studies over the last forty years or so to our emancipation from the narrower model of historiography inspired by Thucydides. 1 We have been gradually liberated to experience the pleasure of Herodotus' text, and among the general educated public the Histories have increasingly been treated as a big book we carry around in our heads, keep on our table , refer to, study, and above all enjoy. Indeed, it is not unlikely for journalists and travelling intellectuals nowadays to pack a copy of the Histories in their bags.2 1.2 Herodotus' work is a history of the interactions between the Greek city­ states and their powerful Near Eastern neighbours that culminated in the Persian invasions of Greece in 490 and 480 BCE . It goes as far back as possible to explore the causes of this conflict, and it traces the rise of the Persians to be masters of a large multi-ethnic empire that conquered, or 1 Green (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Rejuvenations and Satyricons of Yesterday
    REJUVENATIONS AND SATYRICONS OF YESTERDAY By PAN. S. CODELLAS, M.D. SAN FRANCISCO Whence and Whithe r ? and hard labour and exhausting diseases, HEN the grey matter in which the Fates give to men; they lived the human cortex began to like Gods with a soul not touched by sorrow, far away from labour and grief; develop and establish sen- there was no miserable senility; for always sation, perception, emo- the arms and legs were strong and inde- tions, instinctive, purposefulfatigable, or ra - enjoying merry feasts beyond tionalW reactions towards a desired the reach of all evils. They died as if they objective, association, memory, gen- were subdued into sleep.” [Hesiod’s eral intelligence, judgment, then man “Works and Days,” 90 seq.] began to realize environment and attempt to control it. The early man Impos ition of Death in his later intellectual infancy prob- ably was imbued with the curiosity Death was the subject of numerous to answer the question of the origin speculations as to its origin. Among of his earthly appearance and dis- the earliest primitive theories we appearance, of Life and Death. find it commonly thought to be a To primitive intellect human in- trick. At a later period it appears itium and exitus were not two op- to be due to the malevolence of posing ends as they are to maturing demons craving human flesh and for more advanced mind. this inflicting death to men. To some The earliest men thought of life death was the separation of the soul as a natural, normal condition, be- from the body, which was the result cause they realized by it in the male of sorcery.
    [Show full text]
  • Seriously Playful: Philosophy in the Myths of Ovid's Metamorphoses
    Seriously Playful: Philosophy in the Myths of Ovid’s Metamorphoses Megan Beasley, B.A. (Hons) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Classics of The University of Western Australia School of Humanities Discipline of Classics and Ancient History 2012 1 2 For my parents 3 4 Abstract This thesis aims to lay to rest arguments about whether Ovid is or is not a philosophical poet in the Metamorphoses. It does so by differentiating between philosophical poets and poetic philosophers; the former write poetry freighted with philosophical discourse while the latter write philosophy in a poetic medium. Ovid, it is argued, should be categorised as a philosophical poet, who infuses philosophical ideas from various schools into the Metamorphoses, producing a poem that, all told, neither expounds nor attacks any given philosophical school, but rather uses philosophy to imbue its constituent myths with greater wit, poignancy and psychological realism. Myth and philosophy are interwoven so intricately that it is impossible to separate them without doing violence to Ovid’s poem. It is not argued here that the Metamorphoses is a fundamentally serious poem which is enhanced, or marred, by occasional playfulness. Nor is it argued that the poem is fundamentally playful with occasional moments of dignity and high seriousness. Rather, the approach taken here assumes that seriousness and playfulness are so closely connected in the Metamorphoses that they are in fact the same thing. Four major myths from the Metamorphoses are studied here, from structurally significant points in the poem. The “Cosmogony” and the “Speech of Pythagoras” at the beginning and end of the poem have long been recognised as drawing on philosophy, and discussion of these two myths forms the beginning and end of the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • HAPPINESS in HERODOTUS Herodotus Is a Historian of War: The
    Symbolae Osloenses 85, 2011 HAPPINESS IN HERODOTUS CAROLYN DEWALD CLASSICAL STUDIES PROGRAM,BARD COLLEGE, NY, USA In conversation with Croesus, Herodotus' Solon makes two important points about human happiness: a) any human life is filled with change, so a person's happiness cannot be evaluated properly until he or she has died; b) the rich and powerful are as subject to change as anyone else. This paper explores, first, how often and in what ways rich and powerful barbarians and Greeks fail to achieve happiness in the Histories and, secondly, the ways in which the conditions of human life for everyone, rich and poor, slave and free, male and female, as H. depicts them, really do fall far short of the seven kinds of happiness achieved, Solon says, by the otherwise unknown Tellus of Athens. Five of these kinds of happiness are ‘Odyssean’ and involve adequate health and prosperity, with surviving descendants, in a flourishing city. Two might rather be called ‘Iliadic,’ because they involve gaining kleos through a glorious death. Herodotus, however, redefines that kleos so that it comes not only from death in battle but from any death when honored and memorialized in community. An important part of Herodotus' own task as an investigator and recorder of erga megala te kai thômasta is to give recognition, and so something of this kleos (Tellus' seventh and most enduring kind of happiness) to all of the many individuals who appear on the wide and generous canvas of his Histories' narrative. [Among the Trausoi] whenever a baby is born, its relatives gather around and grieve for the troubles it is going to have to endure now that it has been born, and they recount all the suffer- ings of human life (ta anthrôpêia panta pathea).
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts
    THE NATURE OF HELLENISTIC DOMESTIC SCULPTURE IN ITS CULTURAL AND SPATIAL CONTEXTS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Craig I. Hardiman, B.Comm., B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Mark D. Fullerton, Advisor Dr. Timothy J. McNiven _______________________________ Advisor Dr. Stephen V. Tracy Graduate Program in the History of Art Copyright by Craig I. Hardiman 2005 ABSTRACT This dissertation marks the first synthetic and contextual analysis of domestic sculpture for the whole of the Hellenistic period (323 BCE – 31 BCE). Prior to this study, Hellenistic domestic sculpture had been examined from a broadly literary perspective or had been the focus of smaller regional or site-specific studies. Rather than taking any one approach, this dissertation examines both the literary testimonia and the material record in order to develop as full a picture as possible for the location, function and meaning(s) of these pieces. The study begins with a reconsideration of the literary evidence. The testimonia deal chiefly with the residences of the Hellenistic kings and their conspicuous displays of wealth in the most public rooms in the home, namely courtyards and dining rooms. Following this, the material evidence from the Greek mainland and Asia Minor is considered. The general evidence supports the literary testimonia’s location for these sculptures. In addition, several individual examples offer insights into the sophistication of domestic decorative programs among the Greeks, something usually associated with the Romans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Solon in Plato's Dialogues
    The Roles of Solon in Plato’s Dialogues Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Samuel Ortencio Flores, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Bruce Heiden, Advisor Anthony Kaldellis Richard Fletcher Greg Anderson Copyrighy by Samuel Ortencio Flores 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a study of Plato’s use and adaptation of an earlier model and tradition of wisdom based on the thought and legacy of the sixth-century archon, legislator, and poet Solon. Solon is cited and/or quoted thirty-four times in Plato’s dialogues, and alluded to many more times. My study shows that these references and allusions have deeper meaning when contextualized within the reception of Solon in the classical period. For Plato, Solon is a rhetorically powerful figure in advancing the relatively new practice of philosophy in Athens. While Solon himself did not adequately establish justice in the city, his legacy provided a model upon which Platonic philosophy could improve. Chapter One surveys the passing references to Solon in the dialogues as an introduction to my chapters on the dialogues in which Solon is a very prominent figure, Timaeus- Critias, Republic, and Laws. Chapter Two examines Critias’ use of his ancestor Solon to establish his own philosophic credentials. Chapter Three suggests that Socrates re- appropriates the aims and themes of Solon’s political poetry for Socratic philosophy. Chapter Four suggests that Solon provides a legislative model which Plato reconstructs in the Laws for the philosopher to supplant the role of legislator in Greek thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Isaeus 9 and Astyphilus' Last Expedition David Welsh
    WELSH, DAVID, Isaeus 9 and Astyphilus' Last Expedition , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 32:2 (1991:Summer) p.133 Isaeus 9 and Astyphilus' Last Expedition David Welsh SAEUS 9, ON THE ESTATE OF ASTYPHILUS, can be conveniently I studied through part of the family stemma of the litigants.1 The speech relates that the professional soldier Astyphilus died on military service at Mytilcnc, and subsequently in Athens Cleon, his first cousin and the speaker's opponent in the suit, took possession of the estate in the name of his own son. x I Thudippus Euthycrates = sister of Hierocles = Theophrastus I I I Cleon Astyphilus speaker I son Cleon maintained that Astyphilus had adopted this son before his departure and invoked a will deposited with a certain Hierocles. The (unnamed) speaker, Astyphilus' uterine half­ brother by the remarriage of Euthycrates' widow to Theo­ phrastus, denounces the will as a forgery and contends that he has a stronger claim to the estate.z One of his chief arguments is 1 The following works will be cited by author's name: A. R. W. HARRISON, The Law of Athens: The Family and Property (Oxford 1968);]. K. DAVIES, Athenian Propertied Families 600-300 B.C. (Oxford 1971); W. WYSE, The Speeches of Isaeus (Cambridge 1904); A. P. BURNETT and C. N. EDMONSON, "The Chabrias Monument in the Athenian Agora," Hesperia 30 (1961) 74-91; T. T. B. RYDER, Koine Eirene (London 1965); S. HORNBLOWER, Mausolus (Oxford 1982). 2 Since Cleon and his son were respectively the first cousin and first cousin once removed of Astyphilus on the paternal side, either would normally have enjoyed legal precedence over the speaker in the order of succession to the 133 WELSH, DAVID, Isaeus 9 and Astyphilus' Last Expedition , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 32:2 (1991:Summer) p.133 134 ISAEUS 9 AND ASTYPHILUS' LAST EXPEDITION based on Astyphilus' alleged hostility to Cleon because Thudippus was said to have killed Euthycrates in a fraternal quarrel over partition of the family estate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Tim W. Watson June 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Michele R. Salzman, Chairperson Dr. Harold A. Drake Dr. Thomas N. Sizgorich Copyright by Tim W. Watson 2010 The Dissertation of Tim W. Watson is approved: ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In accordance with that filial piety so central to the epistolary persona of Q. Aurelius Symmachus, I would like to thank first and foremost my parents, Lee and Virginia Watson, without whom there would be quite literally nothing, followed closely by my grandmother, Virginia Galbraith, whose support both emotionally and financially has been invaluable. Within the academy, my greatest debt is naturally to my advisor, Michele Salzman, a doctissima patrona of infinite patience and firm guidance, to whom I came with the mind of a child and departed with the intellect of an adult. Hal Drake I owe for his kind words, his critical eye, and his welcome humor. In Tom Sizgorich I found a friend and colleague whose friendship did not diminish even after he assumed his additional role as mentor. Outside the field, I owe a special debt to Dale Kent, who ushered me through my beginning quarter of graduate school with great encouragement and first stirred my fascination with patronage. Lastly, I would like to express my gratitude to the two organizations who have funded the years of my study, the Department of History at the University of California, Riverside and the Department of Classics at the University of California, Irvine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Achaemenid Persia on Fourth-Century and Early Hellenistic Greek Tyranny
    THE INFLUENCE OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA ON FOURTH-CENTURY AND EARLY HELLENISTIC GREEK TYRANNY Miles Lester-Pearson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11826 This item is protected by original copyright The influence of Achaemenid Persia on fourth-century and early Hellenistic Greek tyranny Miles Lester-Pearson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews Submitted February 2015 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Miles Lester-Pearson, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 88,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2010 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2011; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2010 and 2015. Date: Signature of Candidate: 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Protrepticus of Clement of Alexandria: a Commentary
    Miguel Herrero de Jáuregui THE PROTREPTICUS OF CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA: A COMMENTARY to; ga;r yeu'do" ouj yilh'/ th'/ paraqevsei tajlhqou'" diaskedavnnutai, th'/ de; crhvsei th'" ajlhqeiva" ejkbiazovmenon fugadeuvetai. La falsedad no se dispersa por la simple comparación con la verdad, sino que la práctica de la verdad la fuerza a huir. Protréptico 8.77.3 PREFACIO Una tesis doctoral debe tratar de contribuir al avance del conocimiento humano en su disciplina, y la pretensión de que este comentario al Protréptico tenga la máxima utilidad posible me obliga a escribirla en inglés porque es la única lengua que hoy casi todos los interesados pueden leer. Pero no deja de ser extraño que en la casa de Nebrija se deje de lado la lengua castellana. La deuda que contraigo ahora con el español sólo se paliará si en el futuro puedo, en compensación, “dar a los hombres de mi lengua obras en que mejor puedan emplear su ocio”. Empiezo ahora a saldarla, empleándola para estos agradecimientos, breves en extensión pero no en sinceridad. Mi gratitud va, en primer lugar, al Cardenal Don Gil Álvarez de Albornoz, fundador del Real Colegio de España, a cuya generosidad y previsión debo dos años provechosos y felices en Bolonia. Al Rector, José Guillermo García-Valdecasas, que administra la herencia de Albornoz con ejemplar dedicación, eficacia y amor a la casa. A todas las personas que trabajan en el Colegio y hacen que cumpla con creces los objetivos para los que se fundó. Y a mis compañeros bolonios durante estos dos años. Ha sido un honor muy grato disfrutar con todos ellos de la herencia albornociana.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prosecutors of Socrates and the Political Motive Theory
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2-1981 The prosecutors of Socrates and the political motive theory Thomas Patrick Kelly Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Intellectual History Commons, and the Political History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Kelly, Thomas Patrick, "The prosecutors of Socrates and the political motive theory" (1981). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2692. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2689 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Thomas Patrick Kelly for the Master of Arts in History presented February 26, 1981. Title: The Prosecutors of Socrates and The Political Motive Theory. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS CO~rnITTEE: ~~varnos, Cha1rman Charles A. Le Guin Roderlc D1man This thesis presents a critical analysis of the histor- ical roles assigned to the prosecutors of Socrates by modern historians. Ancient sources relating to the trial and the principles involved, and modern renditions, especially those of John Burnet and A. E. Taylor, originators of the theory that the trial of Socrates was politically motivated, are critically 2 analyzed and examined. The thesis concludes that the political motive theory is not supported by the evidence on which it relies. THE PROSECUTORS OF SOCRATES AND THE POLITICAL MOTIVE THEORY by THOMAS PATRICK KELLY A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HISTORY Portland State University 1981 TO THE OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH: The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Thomas Patrick Kelly presented February 26, 1981.
    [Show full text]