The Marshall Plan: Rebuilding a Devastated Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Marshall Plan: Rebuilding a Devastated Europe L A W E N E THE MARSHALL PLAN: R R A W - T REBUILDING A S O DEVASTATED EUROPE P HOW GEORGE C. MARSHALL GUIDED EFFORTS TO REBUILD POST WORLD WAR II EUROPE By Gerald Zarr This is Hamburg in 1945. There were an estimated 500 million cubic tons of rubble in German cities. There were so many unburied corpses in the rubble that whole districts of German cities were walled in to prevent the spread of disease. leading to pitched battles between miners and police. Several hundred Navy electricians narrowly saved the capital’s electric plants from Communist sabotage. In Germany, food rations were reduced to 1,040 calories a day, and men and women fainted at their desks. Without coal, homes went unheated in winter and hundreds died. Troubled by stories of starva - hen the Second World War ended in August 1945, tion in occupied Germany, Europe was devastated. Once-fertile fields were scarred President Truman sent former by bomb craters and tank tracks. Sixty million people president Herbert Hoover on a died. Warsaw, Berlin, Hamburg, Le Havre and Rotter - fact-finding mission to Germany dam lay in ruins. An estimated 500 million cubic tons in early 1946. Hoover was the oWf rubble littered German cities alone. With factories and businesses ideal choice for this job. Born in destroyed, there was no work. Iowa — and still the only presi - dent from that state — he became a mining engineer, and worked “What is Europe now? It is a rubble-heap, a charnel house, in the Australian gold mines. At the outbreak of the First World a breeding ground of pestilence and hate.” War, he found himself in London Winston Churchill, May 14, 1947 and, almost by accident, got into Belgian war relief. For 2 years, he worked 14 hour days, distributing In Britain, this period is known as the Age of Austerity — a time of 2½ million tons of food to 9 mil - drab clothes, long faces, and endless queues. Everyone had a ration lion war victims. In an early form book for food, petrol and clothes. Food rations fell below the wartime of shuttle diplomacy, he crossed average. France had the added burden of Communist-inspired strikes, the North Sea 40 times to meet October/November 2012 History Magazine 37 L duty. After the war, he didn’t seek A W further office, but was not one to E turn down his commander-in- N E chief. In January 1947, he became R secretary of state. In his famous R A speech at Harvard University on 5 W June 1947, he spoke of Europe’s - T S dysfunctional economy: Europe O was caught in a vicious circle. It P had to rebuild its shattered indus - try and get people back to work, but governments had to use their scarce foreign exchange to import food just to keep people alive. The market economy had broken down. With nothing to buy in stores, farmers had no incentive to sell their produce for money. Farmers let their land lie fallow and food production plummeted. Marshall said that the U.S. should A German mother cooks for her family on a street corner in Berlin in August 1945. do what it can “to assist in the return of normal economic health to the world, without which there with German authorities and per - THE MARSHALL PLAN can be no political stability and suade them to allow food ship - UNVEILED no assured peace.” And then to ments, becoming an international George Catlett Marshall was reassure the Soviet Union: “Our hero. In 1946, Hoover crisscrossed America’s foremost soldier during policy is not directed against Germany in Field Marshal Her - World War II, serving as U.S. any country, but against hunger, mann Goering’s old rail coach. His Army chief of staff from 1939 to poverty, and chaos.” report to Truman was sharply 1945. He was a self-effacing man Perched up in his bed in critical of U.S. occupation policy: with a highly developed sense of London, British Foreign Secretary “There’s an illusion that Germany can be reduced to a pastoral state. It can’t be done, unless 25 million people are killed or moved out of Germany.” This was a thinly veiled swipe at the Morgenthau Plan, devised by Henry Morgenthau, Roosevelt’s Treasury Secretary, which sought to turn Germany into a pastoral state, without heavy industry. After Hoover’s report, the Morgenthau Plan was replaced by a new strategy which supported “the complete revival of German industry — because a prosperous Europe requires the economic contributions of a stable and productive Germany.” To combat malnutrition, a school meals program was started, feeding 3.5 In Britain, the postwar years are known as the Age of Austerity. Everyone had a million children, known as the ration book for food, petrol and clothes — and food rations fell below the wartime Hooverspeisung (Hoover meals). average. It was a time of drab clothes, long faces, and endless queues. 38 History Magazine October/November 2012 Ernest Bevin listened to a broad - cast of the speech on the BBC. He immediately grasped its signifi - cance: “It was like a lifeline to sinking men. It seemed to bring hope when there was none. The generosity of it was beyond belief.” Yes, there was altruism in the American offer, but a large dose of self interest too. The American economy had emerged relatively unscathed from World War II and could produce the au - tomobiles, machinery, and other goods that Europe craved, but couldn’t afford. Bevin goaded Europe into action. In July 1947, sixteen West - ern European countries met at the grand dining room of the French Foreign Ministry to agree George Catlett Marshall became on a response to the American secretary of state in Jan. 1947 offer. This was a tall order because — the first career soldier to hold that many competing interests had to office. Here he is in the procession at Harvard University, just before his be reconciled. France insisted that famous speech on 5 June 1947. Germany not be rebuilt to its previous threatening power. The British Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin Benelux countries were closely was the first to see the significance of Marshall’s speech: “George C. Marshall linked to the German economy threw us a lifeline and we grabbed it and felt their prosperity depended with both hands.” With Bevin’s prodding, on its revival. Scandinavia wanted Europe moved quickly. Only one month after Marshall’s speech, 16 Western to protect its trading relationships European countries met at the grand with the Eastern Bloc and safe - dining room of the French Foreign guard its neutrality. Great Britain Ministry to agree on a response to the insisted on special status. The American offer. Americans made it clear that any plan for European recovery had meeting. Molotov went to Paris, At 29, he became secretary of the to come from the Europeans but left in a huff saying the Bristol branch of the Dockers’s themselves. America would only Marshall Plan violated the U.N. Union. He spoke with a strong help those who energetically and charter and the United States was West Country accent. Forever cooperatively helped themselves. a “center of anti-Soviet activity”. reading and studying, in Baptist Marshall made his offer to all The powerful French and Italian chapel and trade union study Europe, not just Western Europe, communist parties were ordered groups, he sought books and de - so for a time, Stalin considered to block the Marshall Plan in bate wherever they were available. applying for Marshall Plan aid. their countries. He developed his oratorical skills But this would require the Soviets as a Baptist lay preacher. He was a to open up their economic books, THE KEY EUROPEANS physically huge, strong and, by the a clear no-no for them. When British Foreign Secretary Ernest time of his political prominence, Czechoslovakia made plans to Bevin was born in a remote very heavy man. It was said of attend the Paris meeting, Stalin Somerset village, orphaned at Bevin — as a compliment to the summoned Foreign Minister Jan eight, and left school at 11. He respect which he had earned — Masaryk to Moscow for a tongue- worked as a bakeshop boy at six - that it was hard to imagine him lashing, which led all Eastern pence a week, a van boy, a horse filling any other job in the Foreign European leaders to boycott the tram conductor, and a teamster. Office except that of an old and October/November 2012 History Magazine 39 L truculent lift attendant. Bevin was Soviet Foreign Minister will quiver a few times and then A W a strong supporter of the United Vyacheslav Molotov accompa - die.” It was named the Marshall E States and the Marshall Plan. nied Stalin to all the wartime Plan. The plan met sharp opposi - N E France’s Foreign Minister conferences, where he was known tion from the isolationist wing of R Robert Schuman was as different as a tough negotiator and deter - the Republican Party and from R A from Ernest Bevin in appearance, mined defender of Soviet inter - Leftists, who saw the plan as a W temperament, mind and manner ests. In his wartime memoirs, subsidy for American exporters - T S as any man could be. He was lean, Churchill lists many meetings and an irritant for the Soviet O slightly stooped, with a long, seri - with Molotov, whom he called a Union. Opposition waned after P ous face, and a habit of sinking his “man of outstanding ability and the Communist coup in Czecho - chin in his collar as he peered over cold-blooded ruthlessness..
Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2021 No. 4 House of Representatives The House met at noon and was and our debates, that You would be re- OFFICE OF THE CLERK, called to order by the Speaker pro tem- vealed and exalted among the people. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, pore (Mr. SWALWELL). We pray these things in the strength Washington, DC, January 5, 2021. of Your holy name. Hon. NANCY PELOSI, f Speaker, House of Representatives, Amen. DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER Washington, DC. PRO TEMPORE f DEAR MADAM SPEAKER: Pursuant to the permission granted in Clause 2(h) of Rule II The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- THE JOURNAL of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representa- fore the House the following commu- tives, I have the honor to transmit a sealed nication from the Speaker: The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- envelope received from the White House on ant to section 5(a)(1)(A) of House Reso- January 5, 2021 at 5:05 p.m., said to contain WASHINGTON, DC, January 6, 2021. lution 8, the Journal of the last day’s a message from the President regarding ad- I hereby appoint the Honorable ERIC proceedings is approved. ditional steps addressing the threat posed by SWALWELL to act as Speaker pro tempore on applications and other software developed or f this day. controlled by Chinese companies. With best wishes, I am, NANCY PELOSI, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Form 990 Or 990‐EZ
    THE GERMAN MARSHALL FUND OF THE Form 990 (2012) UNITED STATES 52-0954751 Page 2 Part III Statement of Program Service Accomplishments Check if Schedule O contains a response to any question in this Part III X 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission: THE GERMAN MARSHALL FUND OF THE UNITED STATES (GMF) STRENGTHENS TRANSATLANTIC COOPERATION ON REGIONAL, NATIONAL, AND GLOBAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE SPIRIT OF THE MARSHALL PLAN. 2 Did the organization undertake any significant program services during the year which were not listed on the prior Form 990 or 990-EZ? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes X No If "Yes," describe these new services on Schedule O. 3 Did the organization cease conducting, or make significant changes in how it conducts, any program services?~~~~~~ Yes X No If "Yes," describe these changes on Schedule O. 4 Describe the organization's program service accomplishments for each of its three largest program services, as measured by expenses. Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations are required to report the amount of grants and allocations to others, the total expenses, and revenue, if any, for each program service reported. 4a (Code: ) (Expenses $ 7,315,551. including grants of $ 5,420,595. ) (Revenue $ ) CIVIL SOCIETY AND GRANT-MAKING GRANTMAKING IS ONE OF GMF'S CORE MISSIONS, AND THROUGH THIS PROCESS, GMF SUPPORTS A WIDE RANGE OF INSTITUTIONS AND INDIVIDUALS WORKING ON TRANSATLANTIC POLICY ISSUES. GMF AWARDS GRANTS PRIMARILY THROUGH FOUR MAJOR GRANTMAKING PROGRAMS - THE BALKAN TRUST FOR DEMOCRACY; THE BLACK SEA TRUST FOR REGIONAL COOPERATION; THE FUND FOR BELARUS DEMOCRACY; AND THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY OFFICE MONTHLY November 2017
    (305) 503-9077 FAMILY OFFICE MONTHLY November 2017 Upcoming Family Office Conferences in 2017-18 Family Office Super Summit elcome to the November edition of Family Office Monthly. We are gearing up for th W the biggest family office conference of the year: the annual Family Office Super December 5-6 , 2017 Summit in Miami, Florida. For four years, the Family Office Super Summit has been the Miami, FL largest gathering of family offices, high-net-worth individuals, and institutional investors. Leading into North America's premier art festival, Art Basel, this family office conference is www.FamilyOffices.com/ an unparalleled opportunity to hear from the leaders in this industry--while enjoying all of Super Miami's luxury and charms. Capital Raising If you plan on attending our upcoming conferences, especially next month's Family Office Bootcamps Super Summit, we encourage you to RSVP as a Charter Member in the new login platform online at www.FamilyOffices.com/Login. If you are not yet a Charter Member, be sure and visit www.FamilyOffices.com/Association to learn why membership keeps growing year February 2017: after year. Houston, TX Synovus Hires Exec to Lead High-Earners in NY and CT Chicago, IL Family Office Unit Consider Moving South Synovus has made a major acquisition to lead In the simmering controversy over tax Miami, FL its family office arm: Jamie Nicholson. reform (or tax cuts), few are shedding tears Atlanta, GA Nicholson comes from Truxton Trust, where for hedge fund managers and other high- she worked for ten years advising high-net- earners that might have to pay more under worth clients on complex..Page 2 an altered tax code.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008-2009 Town Report
    2 2008 2009 0 0 East Windsor 8 Connecticut / 2 0 0 9 ANNUAL REPORT NOTES ABOUT EAST WINDSOR, CONNECTICUT ________________________________________________ ast Windsor was originally settled by farmers in the 17th Century. They were drawn by the even topography and fertile soils of the Connecticut River Val- ________________________________________________ ley. Even today, farming makes up a significant part of our economy. In fact, ________________________________________________ the character of East Windsor is derived from the agricultural land and open Espace which lends our town its rural charm. We are comprised of five villages, Broad ________________________________________________ Brook, Melrose, Scantic, Warehouse Point, and Windsorville. While combined for gov- ________________________________________________ ernment and education convenience, each village is able to retain its own unique identity. ________________________________________________ With a population approaching 10,000, and a land area of 26.3 square miles, East ________________________________________________ Windsor also offers ample opportunity for business and industry to grow. Situated on ________________________________________________ the east side of the Connecticut River, our town lies nearly equal distance between Hartford, Connecticut and Springfield, Massachusetts. We are located minutes from ________________________________________________ Bradley International Airport on Route 5 with fast and easy access to and from I-91. ________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Multilateralism: Renovating the House of Global Economic
    paper series saViNG MULTiLaTeraLisM RENOVATING THE HOUSE OF GLOBAL ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY JeNNifer HiLLMaN The German marshall Fund oF The uniTed sTaTes © 2010 The German Marshall Fund of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF). Please direct inquiries to: The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1744 R Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 F 1 202 265 1662 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at http://www.gmfus.org/publications/index.cfm. Limited print copies are also available. To request a copy, send an e-mail to [email protected]. GMF Paper Series The GMF Paper Series presents research on a variety of transatlantic topics by staff, fellows, and partners of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the view of GMF. Comments from readers are welcome; reply to the mailing address above or by e-mail to [email protected]. About GMF The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) is a non-partisan American public policy and grant-making institu- tion dedicated to promoting greater cooperation and understanding between North America and Europe. GMF does this by supporting individuals and institutions working on transatlantic issues, by convening leaders to discuss the most pressing transatlantic themes, and by examining ways in which transatlantic cooperation can address a variety of global policy challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Gains Withholding
    Capital Gains Withholding Emmanuel Saez, Danny Yagan, and Gabriel Zucman1 University of California Berkeley January 2021 Abstract Capital gains income currently escapes taxation for decades and often forever, as the wealthy wait to sell their stock and other assets. We propose capital gains tax withholding as a friendly amendment to existing reform proposals. Under withholding, the very wealthy – the 0.05% with wealth above $50 million – would have to prepay capital gains taxes over a ten-year period. Illiquid entrepreneurs could prepay their cash taxes using a no-risk government loan. Withheld amounts would be credited toward standard capital gains taxes due upon asset sale so that there is no double tax. Withholding improves mark-to-market proposals because valuation uncertainty and price swings do not impact ultimate tax liability under withholding and because illiquid taxpayers can pay cash taxes without liquidation. Withholding complements realization-at-death proposals because withholding generates large revenue from the living, so a future Congress cannot spare the wealthy without giving them obscenely large refunds. An analysis by the Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that capital gains withholding would enable Congress to raise $2 trillion over the years 2021-2030 even without raising capital gains tax rates. 1 We thank Alan Auerbach, David Gamage, David Kamin, Greg Leiserson, Zach Liscow, Darien Shanske, Joel Slemrod, and numerous conference participants for helpful discussions and comments. Funding from the Center for Equitable Growth and the Stone Center at UC Berkeley is thankfully acknowledged. This document develops an idea briefly mentioned in Saez, Emmanuel and Gabriel Zucman. 2019. “Progressive Wealth Taxation”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.
    [Show full text]
  • “Creative Conservation:” the Environmental Legacy of Pres
    “Creative Conservation:” The Environmental Legacy of Pres. Lyndon B. Johnson, 1963-1969 Derek L. Tanner Kyle L. Walker Brooke Privette Amanda M. Rock Rayanna Hoeft Helen D. Johnson Nancy K. Berlage, Ph. D., Principal Investigator Dan K. Utley, Chief Historian Center for Texas Public History, Department of History Texas State University January 2020 ABSTRACT In May 2019, staff members of the Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park, headquartered at Johnson City, and the Center for Texas Public History at Texas State University met to discuss a partnership for historical research related to President Johnson’s administrative role in conservation and environmentalism. Under the terms of the subsequent contract, graduate Public History students at Texas State University, working as a special projects class, identified, researched, and compiled information on eight distinct topical themes that provide greater insights into the larger context. Within the span of one semester, they conducted original research, and wrote and edited the following report, which is hereby presented to the National Park Service staff in fulfillment of the contract. Additionally, students compiled an extensive curriculum guide following the same general themes. That guide is separate from this published report and has been forwarded to park service personnel as a digital report. I TABLE OF CONTENTS Illustrations.......................................................................................................................... III Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2004Letter from the President
    A BOUT GMF he German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) is an American public policy and grantmaking institution Tdedicated to promoting greater cooperation and understanding between the United States and Europe. GMF does this by supporting individuals and institutions working on transatlantic issues, by convening leaders to discuss the most pressing transatlantic themes, and by examining ways in which transatlantic cooperation can address a variety of global policy challenges. In addition, GMF supports a number of initiatives to strengthen democracies. Founded in 1972 through a gift from Germany as a permanent memorial to Marshall Plan assistance, GMF maintains a strong presence on both sides of the Atlantic. In addition to its headquarters in Washington, DC, GMF has five offices in Europe: Belgrade, Berlin, Bratislava, Brussels, and Paris. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2004LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT . .2 HIGHLIGHTS . .4 Marshall Forum on Transatlantic Affairs International Commission on the Balkans Transatlantic Trends 2004 Public Opinion Survey Trade and Poverty Forum Call to Action Transatlantic Speaker Series Turning an Eye to Turkey PROGRAM AREAS . .8 TRANSATLANTIC POLICY PROGRAM . .9 POLICY DIALOGUE . .9 NATO Summit Trade and Development Program Bundestag Forum on the United States Black Sea Conference Series U.S.–EU Summit Think Tank Symposium Wider Europe Conference Transatlantic Journalists Forum Frozen Conflicts SUPPORT FOR INSTITUTIONS . .16 Foreign Policy Key Institution Program Central and Eastern Europe Key Institution Program Immigration and Integration Key Institution Program SUPPORT FOR INDIVIDUALS . .18 Transatlantic Fellows Program Research Fellowship Program Journalism Fellowship Program TRANSATLANTIC LEADERS PROGRAM . .20 Marshall Memorial Fellowship Congress–Bundestag Forum Transatlantic Initiatives Fund Transatlantic Community Foundation Fellowship Journalism Study Tours APSA Congressional Fellowship Manfred Wörner Seminar STRENGTHENING DEMOCRACIES .
    [Show full text]
  • The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Reagan
    THE PRESIDENT’S AGENDA: POSITION-TAKING, LEGISLATIVE SUPPORT, AND THE PERSISTENCE OF TIME DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By William D. Anderson, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Adviser Professor Kathleen McGraw Professor Herbert Weisberg Adviser Political Science Graduate Program Copyright by William D. Anderson 2005 ABSTRACT The president’s agenda and Congress’s support for the president’s programs are key drivers in American public policy and electoral politics. The study of presidential- legislative relations, however, lacks a broad and rigorous treatment of the normal legislative process, from initial presidential position taking on votes before the House to final veto override votes cast by Congress. This dissertation broadly examines two stages of the normal legislative process, presidential position-taking and House support for the president’s positions, using a data set consisting of more than 3,200 House votes representing the first terms of the Carter through Clinton administrations. The dissertation suggests that three temporal contexts— regime time; political, or intra administration time; and policymaking or discrete time— prominently shape the politics of presidential position taking and legislative support for the president. My analysis then employs a series of uniquely constructed variables to account for the personal and external context within which the president legislates and attempts to persuade members of the House. By doing so, this dissertation tests the degree to which the legislative or executive branch dominates the policy process.
    [Show full text]
  • Dhruva Jaishankar Fellow, Foreign Policy, Brookings India
    Dhruva Jaishankar Fellow, Foreign Policy, Brookings India 6 Dr. Jose P. Rizal Marg, 2nd Floor, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, 110021 India D: 91.11.2415.7772 | M: 91.92.0550.6701 | E: [email protected] @d_jaishankar djaishankar83 dhruvajaishankar EMPLOYMENT Brookings Institution India Center, New Delhi, India 2016-present Fellow, Foreign Policy S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Singapore 2015-2016 Visiting Fellow, South Asia Program The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF), Washington DC, USA 2009-2016 Transatlantic Fellow, Asia Program (2012-present) Program Officer, Asia Program (2009-2012) The Brookings Institution, Washington DC, USA 2007-2009 Senior Research Assistant, 21st Century Defense Initiative (2009) Research Assistant, Foreign Policy Studies (2007-2009) CNN-IBN Television, New Delhi, India 2006 News Writer and Correspondent, World News Desk Edward N. Luttwak, Chevy Chase, Md., USA 2006 Research Assistant The Aspen Institute, Washington DC, USA 2005 Brent Scowcroft Award Fellow, Aspen Strategy Group EDUCATION Master of Arts in Security Studies (M.A.) 2011 Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service Concentration: International Security. Honors for Outstanding Academic Achievement, 2011. Security Studies Program Scholarship, 2009-2011. Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) 2005 Macalester College, Saint Paul, Minn., USA Majors: History & Classics. Minor: Geology. Yahya Armajani Endowed Prize in History, 2005. DeWitt Wallace Scholarship, 2001-2005. 1 SELECT CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS AND LECTURES “India – and Indians – as Global Leaders,” O.P. Jindal School, Sonipat, Haryana, August 1, 2016. “India and the Liberal International Order,” New Zealand-India Research Institute and Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, June 8, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    OFFICES Washington • Berlin • Bratislava • Paris Brussels • Belgrade • Ankara • Bucharest www.gmfus.org Annual Report 2007 The German Marshall Fund of the United States Board List (GMF) is a nonpartisan American public policy and Guido Goldman grantmaking institution dedicated to promoting greater Co-chair cooperation and understanding between the United States and Europe. Marc Leland Co-chair GMF does this by supporting individuals and institutions working on transatlantic issues, by convening leaders to Calvin Dooley discuss the most pressing transatlantic themes, and by Marc Grossman examining ways in which transatlantic cooperation can David Ignatius address a variety of global policy challenges. In addition, Nike Irvin GMF supports a number of initiatives to strengthen Scott Klug democracies. Roman Martinez IV Richard Powers Founded in 1972 through a gift from Germany as a J. Thomas Presby permanent memorial to Marshall Plan assistance, GMF John Ross maintains a strong presence on both sides of the Atlantic. Barbara Shailor In addition to its headquarters in Washington, DC, GMF Amity Shlaes has seven offices in Europe: Berlin, Bratislava, Paris, Jenonne Walker Brussels, Belgrade, Ankara, and Bucharest. J. Robinson West Suzanne Woolsey Leah Zell Wanger Craig Kennedy President Illustrations by Brian Hubble Table of Contents 2 Letter from the President 30 Grantmaking Black Sea Trust Launch 4 Convening Balkan Trust for Democracy Brussels Forum Trust for Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe Marshall Plan 60th Anniversary Foreign
    [Show full text]
  • Disruptive Philanthropy: Chan-Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability Company, and the Millionaire Next Door
    Florida Law Review Volume 70 Issue 5 Article 1 October 2019 Disruptive Philanthropy: Chan-Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability Company, and the Millionaire Next Door Dana Brakman Reiser Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Dana Brakman Reiser, Disruptive Philanthropy: Chan-Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability Company, and the Millionaire Next Door, 70 Fla. L. Rev. 921 (2019). Available at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol70/iss5/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Law Review by an authorized editor of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reiser: Disruptive Philanthropy: Chan-Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability C DISRUPTIVE PHILANTHROPY: CHAN-ZUCKERBERG, THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND THE MILLIONAIRE NEXT DOOR Dana Brakman Reiser* Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Dr. Priscilla Chan, have pledged to give 99% of their net worth to—in their words— “advance[e] human potential and promot[e] equal opportunity.” To make good on this promise, however, they did not set up a traditional nonprofit, tax-exempt organization. Instead, they founded the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative, a limited liability company (LLC). The bulk of this Article provides the definitive explanation for this seemingly bizarre choice. Importantly, the philanthropy LLC structure offers donors the flexibility to bolster charitable grantmaking with impact investment and political advocacy, free of the restrictions, penalties, and transparency requirements applied to tax-exempt vehicles. The LLC form also provides donors complete control over the organizations they found, including an ability to reclaim donated assets that is absolutely prohibited in traditional forms.
    [Show full text]