DOCSLIB.ORG

B-29 U.S.S. Constellation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
B-29 U.S.S. Constellation B-29 U.S.S. Constellation Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 04-25-2013 B-29 1854 U.S.S. CONSTELLATION Designer: John Lenthall Pier 1, 301 E. Pratt Street Baltimore Private With plans completed in May and the keel laid on June 25, 1853, just before steam propulsion was adopted as auxiliary power for all new warships, the "sloop-of-war" CONSTELLATION was the last all sail ship designed by the Navy, as well as the largest "sloop" built to that date. Designed by John Lenthall, Chief Constructor of the Navy, she was much larger than most other ships of that category. Her extreme length (knight head-taffrail) was 186', and her extreme beam was 4'-6". The frames, stem, and knees were constructed of live oak, while her keel, keelson, stempost, and hull planking were of white oak. The ceiling, deck beams, deck planking, and heavy spars were of yellow pine, while her joiner bulkheads were of white pine. Her light spars were of spruce, and her trunnels of locust. The clench bolts and fasteners were of copper below the waterline, and iron above. Her armaments consisted of a main battery (on the gun deck) composed of sixteen 8" "shell guns" capable of firing the innovative "Paixhains" design exploding shell, and four 32-pound "long guns" firing solid shot; a secondary battery (on the spar deck) composed of two 10" pivot guns, one forward and one aft; and one 12-pounder boat howitzer. The ship had five cutters and one launch. Drinking water was carried in 48 iron tanks capable of holding 28,000 gallons. The CONSTELLATION also carried 61 long tons of iron ballast, and 150 fathoms (about 900 feet) of 1 13/16" iron chain for the anchors. £-36 The crew authorized for CONSTELLATION included 20 naval officers, 220 sailors, and 45 marines. The CONSTELLATION was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1975. At that time, it was thought that the ship was the 1797 U.S. FRIGATE CONSTELLATION which was launched in Baltimore, and nicknamed the "Yankee Racehorse" because of her speed. Involved in the undeclared "Quasi War" with France, participating in the campaigns against the Barbary states and Caribbean Pirates, and helping to defend Norfolk from capture by the British during the War of 1812, the frigate was considered worth of listing on the National Register. However, subsequent research determined that the 1797 frigate was decommissioned and dismantled at the Gosport Navy Yard in Portsmouth, Virginia in 1853. That same year, the keel was laid for a new vessel, a sloop of war, at the same Navy Yard. Following Naval tradition, the new ship was named for the recently dismantled one, and the new CONSTELLATION was launched on August 26, 1854. CONSTELLATION was very large for a sloop-of-war, being closer in size to a second class frigate. This enabled the ship to carry a heavier battery of guns than conventional sloops. She was commissioned on July 28, 1855, and began a career which included serving with the Mediterranean Squadron from 1855-1858, capturing three slave ships while the Flagship of the African Squadron from 1859-1861, serving in the Civil War from 1862-1866, and acting as a receiving ship and later a practice ship for the Navy. The ship carried relief supplies to famine victims in Ireland in 1880, and carried works of art from Europe to the Columbian Exposition in Chicago in 1892. She was under sail for the last time in 1893, at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, before being moored at the U.S. Naval Training Center in Newport, Rhode Island, to serve as a stationary training vessel. In 1904 the ship was dry-docked at the New York Navy Yard for extensive survey and repair. By this time, it was generally believed that the ship was the 1797 Frigate, and in 1914 she was ordered restored "as she appeared in 1814" by acting Navy Secretary Franklin D. Roosevelt. To minimize costs, however, these alterations were limited to "such general details as would be noticed by the layman." The 1880s-era bridge platform and 1890s deck housing were removed, and she was displayed in Baltimore and Washington during the fall and winter of 1914 before returning to training duty in Newport. In 1933, she was decommissioned and placed in "Ordinary," essentially being mothballed, until 1955, serving briefly as the Relief Flagship of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet and Battleship Squadron 5 from 1941-1945. In 1955, the City of Baltimore acquired the ship and had it "restored" to its supposed Frigate appearance, making several alterations. The ship served as a tourist attraction in the Baltimore Inner Harbor until the 1990s, when it was drydocked for emergency repairs. The keel was severely "hogged" and much of the wood was rotten. Four years of restoration work has returned the CONSTELLATION to a close approximation of its Civil War appearance. This was the largest non-Naval wooden ship restoration ever undertaken in the United States, costing $7.5 million. Through interpretive and hands-on tours, the CONSTELLATION continues to serve the public. 8-2/? NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 USS CONSTELLATION Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: USS Constellation Other Name/Site Number: United States Sloop-of-War Constellation 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Pier 1, Constellation Dock Not for publication: City/Town: Baltimore Vicinity: State: MD County: Baltimore (Independent City) Code: 510 Zip Code: 21202 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): Public-Local: District: Public-State: Site: Public-Federal: Structure: JX^ Object: Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing buildings sites structures objects 1 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: B-21 NPS Form 10-900 USD1/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev 8-86) OMB No 1024-0018 USS CONSTELLA TION Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form ™4. SIA IT/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of Commenting or Other Official Date ^^tate or Federal Agency and Bureau 5. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this property is: Entered in the National Register Determined eligible for the National Register Determined not eligible for the National Register Removed from the National Register Other (explain): Signature of Keeper Date of Action NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 USS CONSTELLA TION Page 3 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form ^6. FUNCTION OR USE Historic: Transportation Sub: water-related Defense naval facility Current: Recreation and Culture Sub: museum 7. DESCRIPTION ARCHITECTURAL CLASSIFICATION: Naval Ship Sloop MATERIALS: Foundation: wood (hull) Walls: wood (hull) Roof: wood (deck) Other: metal (guns) fc-2/j NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev 8-86) OMB No 1024-0018 USS CONSTELLA TION Page 4 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form iummary The USS Constellation's career in naval service spanned one hundred years: from commissioning on July 28, 1855 at Norfolk Navy Yard, Virginia to final decommissioning on February 4, 1955 at Boston, Massachusetts. (She was moved to Baltimore, Maryland in the summer of 1955.) During that century this sailing sloop-of-war, sometimes termed a "corvette," was nationally significant for its ante-bellum service, particularly for its role in the effort to end the foreign slave trade. It is also nationally significant as a major resource in the mid-191 century United States Navy representing a technological turning point in the history of U.S. naval architecture. In addition, the USS Constellation is significant for its Civil War activities, its late 19th century missions, and for its unique contribution to international relations both at the close of the 19' century and during World War II.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interline® 925
    APPLICATION GUIDELINES BALLAST TANKS Interline® 925 Revision 13 Issue Date: 1st May 2015 Marine Coatings All products supplied and technical advice or recommendations given are subject to our standard Conditions of Sale. Registered in England No. 63604 Registered Office 26th Floor, Portland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5BG Page 1 Application Guidelines Interline® 925 Revision 13 Date 1st May 2015 CONTENTS Page 1. SCOPE AND PURPOSE 3 2. PRODUCT SPECIFICATION AND PRODUCT CURE GRAPHS 4 2.1 Surface Preparation 4 2.2 Specification 4 2.3 Film Thickness 4 2.4 Holding Primer 4 2.5 Notes 5 2.6 Product Cure Graphs 5 3. COATING APPLICATION PROCEDURES 7 4. TECHNICAL INSPECTION AND PROJECT CONTROL 11 5. GENERAL NOTES 12 5.1 Tank condition 12 5.2 Steelwork Preparation 13 5.3 Scaffolding 14 5.4 Ventilation 14 5.5 Dehumidification 15 5.6 Heating 15 5.7 Lighting 16 5.8 Storage at point of application 16 5.9 Grit Blasting 16 5.10 Cleaning 18 5.11 Paint Application 18 5.12 Stripe Coats 19 5.13 Adhesion Testing 20 5.14 Water Testing 22 6. REPAIR PROCEDURES 23 7. HEALTH & SAFETY 24 Marine Coatings All products supplied and technical advice or recommendations given are subject to our standard Conditions of Sale. Registered in England No. 63604 Registered Office 26th Floor, Portland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5BG Page 2 Application Guidelines Interline® 925 Revision 13 Date 1st May 2015 1. SCOPE AND PURPOSE The International Paint Ballast Tank Coating Application Guidelines are produced and revised in accordance with the Worldwide Marine product range.
    [Show full text]
  • AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES in BALLAST WATER DISCHARGES: Issues and Options
    AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES IN BALLAST WATER DISCHARGES: Issues and Options DRAFT REPORT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT September 10, 2001 Prepared by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Office of Wastewater Management Washington, DC PREFACE This draft report, Aquatic Nuisance Species in Ballast Water Discharges: Issues and Options was prepared in response to a petition the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received on January 13, 1999, from the Pacific Environmental Advocacy Center. The petition was filed on behalf of fifteen nongovernmental and State and Tribal governmental organizations. The petition asked that EPA eliminate a regulatory exemption that currently prevents ballast water discharges from vessels from needing permits under EPA’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. The petition was closely followed by a letter from eighteen members of Congress, requesting that EPA examine whether the Clean Water Act can be used to provide effective regulation of aquatic nuisance species in vessel ballast water. In response to the petition, Congress’s inquiry, and the growing national concern about aquatic nuisance species introductions, former Assistant Administrator for Water J. Charles Fox directed Office of Water staff to research the issue of aquatic nuisance species in ballast water discharges, and report back what mechanisms are available under the Clean Water Act or other relevant statutes or programs to effectively control the introduction of aquatic nuisance species through ballast water. EPA is seeking public comment on this draft report, and will finalize the report, taking into account public comments received. If you have information or comments, please email them to [email protected], or mail them to: Marine Pollution Control Branch, ATTN: Ballast Water, US Environmental Protection Agency (4504F), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20460.
    [Show full text]
  • An Eighteenth-Century Ballast Pile Site, Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana
    Study MMS 89-0092 An Eighteenth-Century Ballast Pile Site, Chandeteur Islands, Louisiana An Instrumental and Archaeological Study Y"""f"" Irr1 1 LOV~t! "M" flOtlOA 7tZ~7 J v ,iir ' ` ------------- --\ r[ .S. Department of the Interior MineralsU Management Service Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study MMS 89-0092 An Eighteenth-Century Ballast Pile Site, Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana An Instrumental and Archaeological Study Authors Ervan G . Garrison Charles P . Giammona James Jobling Anthony R . Tripp Ed N . Weinstein Gary A . Wolff Prepared under MMS Contract 14-12-001-30330 by Texas A&M Research Foundation Box 3578 College Station, Texas 77843 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior New Orleans Minerals Management Service December 1989 Gulf of Mexico OCS Regional Office DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Minerals Management Service (MMS) and the Texas A&M Research Foundation . This report has been technically reviewed by the MMS and approved for publication . Approval does not signify that contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use . It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with MMS editorial standards . REPORT AVAILABILITY Extra copies of the report may be obtained from the Public Information Unit (Mail Stop OPS-3-4) at the following address: U .S . Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Gulf of Mexico OCS Regional Office 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394 Attention : Public Information Unit (OPS-3-4) (Telephone Number : (504) 736-2519) CITATION Suggested citation : Garrison, E.G ., C.P .
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Racing Congress
    World Leader in Rating Technology OFFSHORE RACING CONGRESS ORC VPP Documentation 2018 5 2 Copyright c 2018 Offshore Racing Congress All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is only with the permission of the Offshore Racing Congress. CONTENTS 1 Background 13 2 Introduction 15 2.1 Scope . 15 2.2 Overview . 15 2.3 Layout . 15 3 VPP Methodology 17 3.1 Solution Method . 17 3.2 Boat Model . 18 3.2.1 Functional relationships . 19 3.3 Equations of Equilibrium . 20 3.3.1 Driving Force - Drag . 21 3.3.2 Heeling Moment - Rolling Moment . 22 3.4 Water Ballast and Canting Keel Yachts . 23 3.4.1 Canting Keel . 23 3.4.2 Daggerboard (Centreline lifting appendage) . 23 3.4.3 Daggerboard and Bilge boards . 23 3.4.4 Water ballast . 23 3.4.5 Measurement . 24 3.5 Dynamic Allowance (DA) . 24 3.5.1 Credits (2012) . 24 3.5.2 Calculation Procedure . 25 3.6 Non Manual Power . 25 4 Lines Processing Program 27 4.1 Hydrostatics . 27 4.2 LPP Output parameter definitions . 28 4.2.1 Measurement Trim . 28 4.2.2 Sailing Trim . 28 4.2.3 Second Moment Length (LSM) . 28 4.2.4 Appendage stripping . 28 4.2.5 Beam Depth Ratio (BTR) . 29 4.2.6 Maximum Effective Draft (MHSD) . 30 4.2.7 Bulb/Wing Effects . 31 4.3 Appendage wetted areas and lengths . 34 4.3.1 Conventional Fin keel and rudder . 34 4.3.2 Other appendages . 34 4.4 Righting Moment . 34 4.4.1 Righting Arm Curve .
    [Show full text]
  • USS Constellation Historic Ships Museum's African Squadron Reader1 Reading Supplement
    USS Constellation Historic Ships Museum’s 1 African Squadron Reader Reading Supplement - Statement of Purpose. The USS Constellation Museum’s African Squadron Reader supports Baltimore City schoolchildren and teachers in the subjects of history, reading, vocabulary, and listening. Through classroom reading, discussion, analysis, and performing the reinforcement exercises, students achieve two outcomes. First, through reading original historic texts written by those who touched and were touched by the trans-Atlantic slave trade, students focus on and become aware of a little known aspect of their cultural and national heritage. Second, by thoughtfully addressing the texts and supporting materials, individually and collectively, students work to acquire and reinforce their essential communication skills. It is the objective of this Reading Program to support our city’s youth and their teachers as they strive to achieve these goals. Supporting State Curricula. The USS Constellation Museum’s African Squadron Reader Program” supports Maryland’s State Voluntary Curricula in the subject of history; the reading processes fluency, vocabulary, and reading comprehension; and the development of listening skills. For specific goals, see Unit IV, Chapter R. Method. 1. The Historical Backgrounds, Post Scripts, and Additional Information sections provide a great deal of information about the circumstances surrounding the events described. Teachers should preview the material and explain or read it to the class. Footnotes provide still more detailed, factual information that when explained, will help students put the writings into a meaningful historical context. 2. Readings are taken from accounts, reports, journals, or letters. As students read or are read them, they will be exposed to new vocabulary, mannerisms of expression, and the concepts they revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Analysis of a Variable Buoyancy System for Efficient
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Design and Analysis of a Variable Buoyancy System for Efficient Hovering Control of Underwater Vehicles with State Feedback Controller Brij Kishor Tiwari and Rajiv Sharma * Design and Simulation Laboratory, Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai (TN) 600036, India; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 February 2020; Accepted: 4 April 2020; Published: 8 April 2020 Abstract: The design process for Variable Buoyancy System (VBS) is not known in full, and existing approaches are not scalable. Furthermore, almost all the small size Autonomous Underwater Vehicles/Gliders (AUVs/G’s) use very low capacity of buoyancy change (in the range of few milliliters) and the large size AUVs require large buoyancy change. Especially for adverse weather conditions, emergency recovery or defense-related applications, higher rate of rising/sinking (heave velocity) is needed along with an ability to hover at certain depth of operation. Depth of UVs can be controlled either by changing the displaced volume or by changing the overall weight and, herein, our focus is on the later. This article presents the problem of design and analysis of VBS for efficient hovering control of underwater vehicles at desired depth using the state feedback controller. We formulate and analyze the design and analysis approach of VBS using the fundamental of mechanics, system dynamics integration and control theory. Buoyancy is controlled by changing the overall weight of the vehicle using the ballasting/de-ballasting of water in ballast tanks through the use of Positive Displacement Pump (PDP) for control in heave velocity and hovering depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Everything Is Ballast: an Examination of Ballast Related Practices
    EVERYTHING IS BALLAST: AN EXAMINATION OF BALLAST RELATED PRACTICES AND BALLAST STONES FROM THE EMANUEL POINT SHIPWRECKS by Matthew Julian Gifford B.A., Western Washington University, 2008 A thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences The University of West Florida In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Anthropology 2014 © 2014 Matthew Julian Gifford The thesis of Matthew Julian Gifford is approved: ______________________________________________ ________________________ John E. Worth, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ______________________________________________ ________________________ Gregory D. Cook, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ______________________________________________ ________________________ Christopher R. Kelson, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ______________________________________________ ________________________ John R. Bratten, Ph.D., Committee Chair Date Accepted for the Department/Division: ______________________________________________ ________________________ John R. Bratten, Ph.D., Chair Date Accepted for the University: ______________________________________________ ________________________ Richard S. Podemski, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to Dr. Elizabeth Benchley, the UWF Archaeology Institute and the UWF Scholarly and Creative Activities Grant program whose support and funding were invaluable for the completion of this project. I am extremely thankful to my advisors who offered indispensable input and resources which
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Chaffcutter Thames Sailing Barge Trust
    Golden Chaffcutter Thames Sailing Barge Trust Issue 126 www.bargetrust.org January 2020 From the Helm 1 Centaur Celebrates 125th Birthday Membership 2 Renewal Newcomer to 3 Beccles Trainees Get to 4 Sail Blue Mermaid Centaur 125th 5 Birthday Centaur Update 6 Pudge Update 6 Film Show 8 Dates For Your 8 Diary 100 Club 9 2020 Sailing 9 Programme AGM Notice 11 Centaur at Brewery Wharf, Lewes c1905 Picture kindly provided by Society of Sailing Barge Research From the Helm Welcome to the first Golden rior of Pudge and dismantling, Kevin to develop a viewing area Chaffcutter of 2020. We are recording, refurbishing, repaint- at the Fullbridge where progress already a month into the new ing labelling and storing every- will be visible for all who are in- year, and the start date for thing that will need to be put terested. This is something that Pudge’s refurbishment is get- back in order for her to sail the Lottery are very keen on and ting much closer. Although again next year. will help us to engage with the the work has not formally general public. started yet, so much has al- The majority of the timber has ready been accomplished by now been sourced, and much of Of course, there is plenty of oth- the volunteers and the vari- it cut to size and delivered to er activity going on, some really ous committee members in Kevin Finch’s yard at the Full- positive, such as the mainte- getting preparations so far bridge where it will stand until nance program on Centaur which along.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical and Experimental Studies of Sail Aerodynamics
    Departamento de Arquitectura y Construcci´onNavales Escuela T´ecnicaSuperior de Ingenieros Navales Universidad Polit´ecnicade Madrid PhD Thesis Numerical and Experimental Studies of Sail Aerodynamics By Ms. Patricia Izaguirre Alza M.Sc. in Naval Architecture Supervisor: Prof. Luis P´erezRojas Ph.D. in Naval Architecture Professor in Ship Theory 2012 ii Abstract The purpose of this investigation was the determination of the aerodynamic performance of sails and gain knowledge of the phenomena involved in order to improve the aerody- namic characteristics. In this research, the airflow around different sails in four scenarios was studied. The method to analyze these scenarios was the combination of numerical simulations and experimental tests by taking advantage of the best of each tool. Two different Com- putational Fluid Dynamic codes were utilized: the ANSYS-CFX and the CD-Adapco's STAR-CCM+. The experimental tests were conducted in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel at the Universidad de Granada (Spain), the Twisted Flow Wind Tunnel at the University of Auckland (New Zealand) and the A9 Wind Tunnel at the Universidad Polit´ecnicade Madrid (Spain). Through this research, it was found the three-dimensional effect of the mast on the aerodynamic performance of an IMS Class boat. The pressure distribution on a Transpac 52 Class mainsail was also determined. Moreover, the aerodynamic perfor- mance of the 43ft and 60ft Dhow Classes was obtained. Finally, a feasibility study was conducted to use a structural wing in combination with conventional propulsions systems. The main conclusion was that this research clarified gaps on the knowledge of the aerodynamic performance of sails.
    [Show full text]
  • A Standard of Safety for Thame
    REV 0511 A Standard of Safety for Thames Sailing Barges INTRODUCTION The traditional Thames Sailing Barge, with its distinctive spritsail rig, has evolved over the past 150 years as a highly efficient, safe craft, when manned by those experienced and qualified in the barges' traditions and heritage. It is recognised that it is necessary to establish a realistic system of equivalence to modern legislation that will allow the small remaining fleet of Thames Sailing Barges to continue to sail their historically established waters in a safe manner. It is recognised that the Maritime and Coastguard Agency Codes of Practice, developed to deal with small vessels operating commercially at sea, do not readily lend themselves to being applied to traditional vessels of this type which operate primarily within categorised waters. Therefore, the MCA, the Sailing Barge Association and the Association of Bargemen have developed an alternative method of providing an equivalent level of safety. It is the intention that the method of dealing with the safety of traditional Thames Sailing Barges should not only recognise the particular characteristics of the historic Thames Sailing Barges and their rigs, but also their operation and the certification of their crew. Thames Sailing Barges subject to the Thames Sailing Barge Certificate (the Certificate) may also operate as “pleasure vessels”1 if built before 21st July 1968 and less than 150 gross tonnage, between places on the United Kingdom coast. BACKGROUND In the early stages of development of the Code of Practice for the Safety of Small Commercial Vessels in Commercial Use for Sport or Pleasure Operating from a Nominated Departure Point (NDP Code), the Sailing Barge Association and the Association of Bargemen drew to the attention of the MCA (The Marine Safety Agency at that time) the difficulties that there would be in applying the proposed Code to traditional Thames Sailing Barges.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTITUTION CLOSE UP: Minutiae for the Modeler and Artist
    CONSTITUTION CLOSE UP: Minutiae For The Modeler And Artist By Commander Tyrone G. Martin, U.S. Navy {Retired) A Timonier Working Monograph February2003, TGM TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Overview Abbreviations Hull Masts, Spars, Rigging, and Sails Spar Deck Gun Deck Berth Deck Orlop Deck Guns Boats Lucky Bag Appendices: A. Table of Mast and Spar Dimensions B. Standing Rigging Dimensions, 1797 C. Sail Dimensions, 1824 D. Some Rigging Work Notes, 1835 E. 24-pounder Long Gun Specifications, 1795 F. 24-pounder Long Gun Specifications, 1808 and 1816 G. 32-pounder Carronade Specifications, 1808 Glossary Introduction INTRODUCTION USS Constitution ("Old Ironsides") has been a major icon of the American experience for over two hundred years now. For those living and working in Boston, her black and white hull and raked masts towering nearly two hundred feet combine as a familiar, constant and reassuring sight where the Mystic and Charles Rivers join the harbor. Most assume they are seeing a ship that always has looked that way. Artists and model makers, however, tend to be more curious, to try and determine whether or not the ship had her current appearance at some point in the past, and if not, how she did look. What they soon discover is that, like most things in this world, the fabled frigate evolved over time, depending upon the use to which she was to be put and what the technology of the time offered. She began service bearing an allegorical figurehead above her cutwater, but it was lost in an accident a few years later. Her gun streak, over the years, went from yellow to white to yellow to white to red to white.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Ship and Boat Building Terms
    SHIP AND BOAT BUILDING TERMS Glossary: A collection of lists and explanations of abstruse, obsolete, dialectical or technical terms. O.E.D. Reference Document: Modern Shipbuilding Terms F. Forrest Pease, J. B. Lippincott Company This glossary gives definitions of many (but by no means all) of the ship/boat construction terms the marine surveyor will find. They relate to the hull only and are mainly those that the author learned when he was an apprentice shipwright. They include some very ancient ones and a few that are now obsolete but were still in use, again, when the author was a shipwright. The glossary is not confined to words used on small wooden or metal pleasure boats as it includes words relating to the construction and survey of vessels built of other materials and also many words relating to the commercial vessels that come within the small craft definition such as barges, coasters, small bulk carriers, tugs and trawlers, dredgers etc. It is useful to include such of these definitions as are appropriate as an appendix to any report prepared by the marine surveyor for expert witness or other legal purposes. The reference document above gives a number of terms not found in this glossary as it is aligned to big shipbuilding rather than small craft. It is, nevertheless, a useful addition to the marine surveyor’s library. Where American terms are known by the author to be different from the British both are given. Words specific to frp boats, canal boats and ferrocement are given in other glossaries in the relevant chapters above.
    [Show full text]