DOCSLIB.ORG

And Regional Development Environment, Energy,Transport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And Regional Development Environment, Energy,Transport NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION THEMATIC ROUND TABLE ON ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY,TRANSPORT AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT KOSOVO 2020 REPORT May 2013, Pristina This Report has been developed based on series of meetings conducted by the Thematic Round Table on Environment, Energy, Transport, and Regional Development.. As such this Report is part of a set of documents endorsed by Task Force for European Integration. The work of the Task Force for European Integration and its Thematic Roundtables, including the preparation of this Report has been supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft f· Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) through the Project “Support to the European Integration Process in Kosovo”. The views, information and/or arguments do not necessarily reect the ofcial opinion of the MEI, GiZ or any other stakeholder to every detail. TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 1. Environment ................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Air ..................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1. Laws and administrative instructions for the sector ................. 9 1.1.2. Basic documents for the sector ..................................................... 10 1.2. Climate Change .............................................................................. 11 1.2.1. Legal framework............................................................................. 14 1.2.2. Strategic documents ....................................................................... 14 1.2.3. Objectives and priorities ................................................................ 14 1.3. Waste ................................................................................................ 15 1.3.1. Legal framework............................................................................. 17 1.3.2. Strategic documents ....................................................................... 18 1.3.3. Institutional framework ................................................................. 20 1.3.4. Challenges ....................................................................................... 21 1.4. Chemicals......................................................................................... 22 1.4.1. Legal framework............................................................................. 23 1.4.2. Institutional framework ................................................................. 24 1.4.3. Strategic documents: ...................................................................... 24 1.4.4. Challenges ....................................................................................... 25 1.5. Water ................................................................................................ 25 1.5.1. Legal framework............................................................................. 27 1.5.2. Core documents for the sector ...................................................... 29 1.5.3. Objectives and priorities ................................................................ 30 1.6. Nature conservation ....................................................................... 31 1.6.1. Legal framework............................................................................. 33 1.6.2. Strategic documents ....................................................................... 34 1.6.3. Institutional framework ................................................................. 35 1.6.4. Challenges ....................................................................................... 36 Land Protection ............................................................................... 40 1.6.5. Legal and institutional framework .............................................. 42 1.6.6. Strategic documents ....................................................................... 42 1.6.7. Challenges ....................................................................................... 43 1.7. Control of industrial pollution and risk management .............. 43 1.7.1. Legal framework............................................................................. 44 1.7.2. Intervention plans in case of an environment accident ............ 46 1.8. Objectives and priorities for industry sector .............................. 46 1.9. Protection from noise ..................................................................... 47 1.9.1. Laws and administrative instructions for the sector ................. 48 1.9.2. Basic documents for the sector ..................................................... 48 1.10. Challenges ....................................................................................... 49 2. Energy ............................................................................................................ 50 2.1. EU requirements in the energy sector ......................................... 52 2.2. Legislative framework ................................................................... 56 2.3. Institutional set-up ......................................................................... 57 2.4. Strategic documents ....................................................................... 59 2.5. Security of Supply .......................................................................... 60 2.6. Internal Energy Market ................................................................. 66 2.7. Renewable Energy .......................................................................... 71 2.8. Energy Efficiency ............................................................................ 77 2.9. Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection .................................... 83 2.10. Main Challenges and recommendations .................................... 85 2.11. Annexes ............................................................................................ 88 3. Transport in Kosovo .................................................................................... 112 3.1. Legislation ....................................................................................... 114 Harmonization of transport legislation ....................................... 114 3.2. Coordinated strategic planning in transport .............................. 116 3.3. Institutional Framework: Regulatory and monitoring authorities in transport sector ....................................................... 121 3.4. Road transport and market access: challenges for harmonization of standards .......................................................... 122 3.4.1. Transport of dangerous goods – standards applied in Kosovo ......................................................................................... 124 3.4.2. Tariffs applied on vehicles in Kosovo road network ................ 125 3.5. Railway Transport: market access and safety certificates ........ 126 3.6. Water transport and Kosovo ......................................................... 128 3.7. Air Transport ................................................................................... 128 3.8. Challenges of the transport sector ............................................... 132 4. Regional Development ............................................................................... 134 4.1. Legal and institutional framework .............................................. 134 4.2. Strategic Documents ...................................................................... 136 4.3. Current state of affairs ................................................................... 138 4.4. Programming .................................................................................. 141 4.5. Monitoring and Evaluation ........................................................... 144 4.6. Management and Financial Control ............................................ 145 4.7. Main challenges and recommendations...................................... 145 Conclusions of the Working Group meeting of the 9th March 2013 ........ 146 I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to diagnose the current situation in the area of environ- ment, energy, transport and regional development in Kosovo. The report is a summary of the discussion papers presented at the workshops organised within the Thematic Roundtable 6 on Environment, Energy, Transport and Regional Development, part of the Task Force for European Integration of Kosovo. The Thematic Roundtable 6 included a number of workshops organised to discuss and agree on the current state of affairs in the areas of environment, energy, transport and regional development. The draft discussion papers were presented and discussed amongst different stakeholders including representatives of Kosovo Government, civil society including business and non-governmental organisations, as well as representa- tives of different international organisations working in the relevant areas. In addition the discussion papers were followed by a number of presentations from other stake- holders mainly representatives of the Government institution, while the discussions were focused on identifying strength and weaknesses in the sectors. The first chapter includes an overview of the situation on environment. The report is divided into several sub-chapters presenting the current state of affairs in environment sectors: air, water, waste, climate change, nature protection with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Effects of Nationalism on Territorial Integrity Among Armenians and Serbs Nina Patelic
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2008 The Effects of Nationalism on Territorial Integrity Among Armenians and Serbs Nina Patelic Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact lib-ir@fsu.edu FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE EFFECTS OF NATIONALISM ON TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AMONG ARMENIANS AND SERBS By Nina Patelic A Thesis submitted to the Department of International Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2008 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Nina Pantelic, defended on September 28th, 2007. ------------------------------- Jonathan Grant Professor Directing Thesis ------------------------------- Peter Garretson Committee Member ------------------------------- Mark Souva Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKOWLEDGEMENTS This paper could not have been written without the academic insight of my thesis committee members, as well as Dr. Kotchikian. I would also like to thank my parents Dr. Svetlana Adamovic and Dr. Predrag Pantelic, my grandfather Dr. Ljubisa Adamovic, my sister Ana Pantelic, and my best friend, Jason Wiggins, who have all supported me over the years. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………..v INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………….1 1. NATIONALISM, AND HOW IT DEVELOPED IN SERBIA AND ARMENIA...6 2. THE CONFLICT OVER KOSOVO AND METOHIJA…………………………...27 3. THE CONFLICT OVER NAGORNO KARABAKH……………………………..56 CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………...……….89 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………93 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH………………………………………………………….101 iv ABSTRACT Nationalism has been a driving force in both nation building and in spurring high levels of violence. As nations have become the norm in modern day society, nationalism has become detrimental to international law, which protects the powers of sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • 59-012 Vanka-Heijman.Indd
    The Kosovar wine cluster: A booster for regional development? Gajo M. VANKA1, Wim J.M. HEIJMAN2 1Department of Social Sciences, Economics of Consumers and Households Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands 2Department of Social Sciences, Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands Abstract: Kosovo is an economy in transition with a high unemployment, a young population and structural problems. Clusters could be considered as an appropriate approach to develop the region. Th is paper deals with the economic pro- spects of the Kosovar wine cluster, its current opportunities and the introduction of new approaches. Th e analysis was based on the Porter’s innovation theory and the diamond model. Th e Kosovar wine sector could be a promising example for the future cluster development. Wine has a long history in Kosovo although wine consumption is not widespread. Th is paper presents the main problems and opportunities within this sector, describing its structural changes and current developments. Th e study aims to introduce its readers to the potential that the cluster development can off er as well as to understand the local circumstances. Its main focus is therefore to introduce the advantages and opportunities that clusters could bring to this sector, considering the three pillars of sustainable development, namely economic growth, environmen- tal and social development, and achieving competitiveness. Key words: agribusiness sector, business clusters, competitiveness, diamond model, Kosovo, Porter’s innovation theory, Serbia, sustainable development, wine. This research examines sustainable development winemaking all makes this sector attractive to foreign in Kosovo by focusing on the interaction between agencies and investors.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Transport in Kosovo
    NATIONALNATIONAL BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND REPORTREPORT ONON TRANSPORTTRANSPORT FORFOR KOSOVOKOSOVO* Shaban Buza, PhD, Professor Ramadan Duraku, MSc, Lecturer Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Consultation Session on Transport May 19 and 20, 2009 in Sarajevo/Bosnia-Herzegovina NATIONAL BACKGROUND REPORT ON TRANSPORT FOR KOSOVO KEY NOTES ¾ Introduction ¾ The Transport S&T system ¾ Overview of Transport research activities ¾ Key drivers of Transport research ¾ Integration of country in the European Research Area in field of Transport ¾ SWOT analysis of the Transport research capacity ¾ Transport research priorities for Kosovo Consultation Session on Transport Shaban Buza, PhD, Professor & Ramadan Duraku, MSc, Lecturer May 19 and 20, 2009 in Sarajevo/Bosnia-Herzegovina Faculty of Mechanical Engineering NATIONAL BACKGROUND REPORT ON TRANSPORT FOR KOSOVO INTRODUCTION Transport Sector is composed of three sub-sectors: 9Roads, with a network of 8,522 km classified as public roads, mainly single lane in poor condition, 9Railways, a system of 333 km situated in the North-South and East-West of Prishtina, and 9Air Transports with two airports, Prishtina International Airport (PIA) and Gjakova Airport for military purposes. Transport Infrastructure in Kosovo is in poor condition with insufficient road maintenance, rehabilitation and development, where 9Road transport covers over 95% of transport 9Railway infrastructure, movement, market and general services are of low quality. In the field of Trans-European Transport Network, Kosovo reached some progress
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo Economy & Society After 1945
    Conflict Studies Research Centre G103 Kosovo Economy & Society After 1945 Some Observations James Pettifer This paper argues that many of the dilemmas the international community is facing in Kosovo have their origins in the immediate post-1945 period, and that lack of understanding of the nature of Kosovo society under communism and the Kosovo economy under Titoism is hampering the international community in governing Kosovo today. In the current major political and military conflict in Kosovo which culminated in the NATO bombing campaign, refugee exodus and subsequent withdrawal of Yugoslav troops and police from Kosovo in June 1999, the recent history of Kosovo has tended to be discussed from the period of the accession to power of Slobodan Milosevic in the late 1980s, and in more or less exclusively political terms. The 1974 Constitution, with its democratisation proposals, is usually about the limit of most non-Kosovars’ historical perspective. Yet in a recent British television interview the US Balkan negotiator Richard Holbrooke made the interesting revelation that in the latter stages of the Febuary 1999 negotiations before the NATO campaign began, it was events in Kosovo in 1946 that were at the forefront of Slobodan Milosevic’s mind.1 The violence that Milosevic was recalling was part of a much wider and deeper political crisis that occurred in Kosovo after World War II that has been little understood in the West. It is nevertheless still of seminal importance is assessing options for the future of Kosovo. Thousands of ethnic Albanians rose in revolt against the Tito government and disturbances continued in Kosovo for the next few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo's Agency for Environment Protection
    Kosovo’s Agency for Environment Protection A REPORT OF ENVIRONMENT SITUATION 2006-2007 Pristine 2008 Content CONTENT Content ………………….. Introduction Report compilers and Partners Abbrevations’ Index Table List Illustrations list Map list Summary I. PRESSIONS ACOORDING TO SECTORS 1. Socio-economic aspects Migration of total number of population and prognosis Natality of population Urbanization Density of population The population structure according to the age Economic development Rural population Habitations Destination of the land utilization 2. Energy Assessment of the situation Overall consumption of energy Energy intensity Production of primary energy Production of electricity Alternative sources of energy 3. Industry Assessment of situation Industrial production Industrial accidents Mine and minerals 4. Agriculture Assessment of situation Agricultural areas Utilization of pesticides and fertilizers Animal fond Farms Fishery and aquaculture 5. Forestry Assessment of situation Sustainable utilization of the forestry resources Forests according to the form of utilization Forestry production Forest impairment Content 6. Transport Assessment of situation Road infrastructure Air transport Public transport of passengers Transport of goods 7. Tourism Assessment of situation The register of tourists The capacity of emplacement Visits in the protected areas 8. Chemicals Assessment of situation II. SITUATION 1. Air Assessment of situation Broadcastings Quality Monitoring of air quality Monitoring of air quality in Pristine Monitoring of air quality in Mitrovica Monitoring of air quality in KEK- OBILIQ Climate changes UNDP Report Sources of the acidic compositions in air Acidulation 2. Waters Assessment of situation Superficial waters Rivers and water basins Lakes Underground waters Water management Water utilization in economy Water pollution 3. Soil Assesment of situation Pollution with heavy metals 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H6058
    H6058 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE July 21, 1999 So I would hope that we can do what just say to my friend we could move to XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the gentleman from Connecticut has rise, and it will take all of 30 seconds the Committee of the Whole House on suggested. to do it in the full House and then go the State of the Union for the further The CHAIRMAN pro tempore. Would right back. consideration of the bill, H.R. 2415. the gentlewoman from California be Mr. GEJDENSON. We achieve the willing to withdraw her amendment same goal, and I think my colleagues b 1458 momentarily in order to accommodate could sit down. Either way we get the the suggestion made by the ranking same result. IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Mr. SMITH of New Jersey. I am not member? Accordingly, the House resolved Ms. WATERS. Following the 1 sure if the gentlewoman is willing. itself into the Committee of the Whole minute of the 2 minutes which were Mr. ACKERMAN. Mr. Chairman, I House on the State of the Union for the granted for the extension of the debate, move to table this amendment with the further consideration of the bill (H.R. I would be willing to do that. But for understanding that it would be 2415) to enhance security of United the 1 minute that is still left in this de- untabled at the appropriate time. bate I would respectfully like to take The CHAIRMAN pro tempore. In States missions and personnel over- that at this time, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Country Reports Kosovo*
    PRIORITY SETTING TO STRUCTURE PARTICIPATION IN THE 7TH FRAMEWORK PROGRAM BACKGROUND COUNTRY REPORTS KOSOVO* Pristina, May 2013 *This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence. WBC-INCO.NET, an FP7 funded project running from 2008 to 2013 with a total of 29 project partners, aims at the enhancement of the integration of Western Balkan Countries in the European Research Area (ERA). Its core objectives are to support the bi-regional dialogue on science and technology (S&T), to identify RTDI cooperation potentials and priorities for take-up in FP and other EU programmes, to enhance participation of WB researchers in EU projects, to analyse innovation needs and barriers in the WBC, to exchange information and best practices on innovation policies and to establish closer cooperation between research and innovation. WBC-INCO.NET is being coordinated by the Centre for Social Innovation, Austria. Publisher: WBC-INCO.NET The report is a WBC-INCO.NET deliverable produced in the frame of the project's Work Package 2: Priority setting to structure participation in FP, Task 2.4: Consultation sessions. The project is co-funded by the European Community's Programme for International Cooperation under the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (2007- 2013). Neither the Community, nor WBC-INCO.NET project partners and Centre for Social Innovation, as a main publisher of this report, are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Editors: Dukagjin Pupovci, Xhavit Rexhaj Design, Typesetting and Cover Illustration: Petrit Tahiri Date of publication: April 2013 Please cite this publication as: WBC-INCO.NET (2013): Priority Setting to Structure Participation in the 7th Framework Program, Background Country Reports – Kosovo.
    [Show full text]
  • Airfields in the Republic of Kosovo Important Note
    Airfields in the Republic of Kosovo Important note Upon publication of this document, CAA in no way has approved the use of the airfields covered. This publication intends to provide information to their potential users and state of play of the concerning airfields. CAA considers the use of these airfields or other airfields in the Republic of Kosovo, for aeronautical activities without prior approval pursuant to the applicable legislation, as unlawful. Contents What is an airfield and what is it used for? ........................................................................................ 4 Background of airfields in the Republic of Kosovo ........................................................................... 5 Legal basis for the approval and use of airfields ................................................................................ 6 Description of airfields in the Republic of Kosovo ............................................................................ 7 Airfield in Koretica – Drenas ............................................................................................................... 7 Airfield in Marina – Skenderaj .......................................................................................................... 10 Airfield in Jashanice – Klina .............................................................................................................. 13 Airfield in Krusheva – Klina .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Compliance with This Document Is Mandatory
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO THE PUBLIC BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER COMBINED AIR OPERATIONS CENTER 5 (CAOC5) – POGGIO RENATICO REGULATIONS FOR AIRCRAFT OPERATING AS GENERAL AIR TRAFFIC (GAT) IN THE BALKAN JOINT OPERATION AREA (JOA) VERSION 5.1 DATED 5 APR 12. This regulation supersedes version 5 dated 15 Mar 10 Certified by NATO COMCAOC5-PR LtGen M. R. Ottone, ITAF ORIGINAL SIGNED COMPLIANCE WITH THIS DOCUMENT IS MANDATORY. Authority: 1. United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 (10 Jun 99). 2. Military Technical Agreement between the signing parties. (KFOR, Govts of Federal Republic of YUGOSLAVIA and SERBIA (now MONTENEGRO and SERBIA) - 9 Jun 99. 3. Helsinki Agreement between the signing parties (US and Russian Federation) – 18 Jun 99 4. General Framework Agreement for Peace in BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA (Initialed by Govts of BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA, CROATIA and the Federal Republic of YUGOSLAVIA –(now MONTENEGRO and SERBIA) 21 Nov 95) 5. Letter of agreement between NATO/SFOR Airspace Control Authority and CROATIA Control Ltd, Zagreb ACC. 6. Agreement for the provision of NATO support to the EU for the command and control for the airspace of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina 10 Dec 2004. 7. Protocol on the release of Bosnia and Herzegovina airspace - Paris, 20 Apr 2007 Request for changes or questions regarding this regulation may be directed to balkans.corridors@caocpr.nato.int. 1 REGULATIONS FOR AIRCRAFT OPERATING AS GENERAL AIR TRAFFIC (GAT) IN THE BALKAN JOA VERSION 5.1 EFFECTIVE 5 APR 12 NATO UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO THE PUBLIC
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Environment and Spa Al Planing Kosovo Environmenta I
    Ministry of Environment and Spaal Planing Kosovo Environmenta i Protecon Agency MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT KOSOVO ENVIRONMENTAL AND SPATIAL PLANNING PROTECTION AGENCY State of Environment in Kosovo 2015 Report Prishtina, 2015 State of Environment in Kosovo 2015, Report Approval Procedures On the 25th of June 2015, the Directory for Monitoring. Assessment and Environmental Reporting completed the Report and submitted it to the Office of the CEO of KEPA, asking him to proceed for the approval in the Assembly of Kosovo, as required under Article 25 of the Law on Environment Protection. On the 2nd of July 2015, the CEO of KEPA, through the Minister of MESP, submitted the following proposed agenda item to the Government of Kosovo: the Submission of the State of the Environment Report in Kosovo 2015 for approval to the Assembly of Kosovo. The Government of Kosovo, at the meeting held on the 29th of August 2015, has reviewed “The State of the Environment Report in Kosovo 2015” and has endorsed the Report under the Decision No. 01/86, calling for its submission for approval to the Assembly of Kosovo. On the 29th of September 2015, the Parliamentary Commission on Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Spatial Planning, has reviewed The State of the Environment Report 2015 at its 22nd session, and forwarded it for approval to the Assembly of Kosovo. At the plenary session, on the 30th of November 2015, the Assembly of Kosovo, after discussion, has reached the Decision no. 05-V-183 on the approval of the Report. Kosovo Environmental Protection Agency 3 State of Environment in Kosovo 2015, Report Foreword Dear readers, The environmental protection and sustainable use of natural resources remain one of the major challenges of our society.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Report on the Annual Financial Statements of Gjakova Airport J.S.C for the Year Ended 31 December 2017
    Document No: 23.6a.1-2017-08 AUDIT REPORT ON THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GJAKOVA AIRPORT J.S.C FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2017 Prishtina, June 2018 The National Audit Office of the Republic of Kosovo is the highest institution of economic and financial control which, according to the Constitution and domestic laws, enjoys functional, financial and operational independence. The National Audit Office undertakes regularity and performance audits and is accountable to the Assembly of Kosovo. Our Mission is through quality audits strengthen accountability in public administration for an effective, efficient and economic use of national resources. We perform audits in line with internationally recognized public sector auditing standards and good European practices. The reports of the National Audit Office directly promote accountability of public institutions as they provide a base for holding managers’ of individual budget organisations to account. We are thus building confidence in the spending of public funds and playing an active role in securing taxpayers’ and other stakeholders’ interests in enhancing public accountability. The Auditor General has decided on the audit opinion on the Annual Financial Statements of the Central Publicly Owned Enterprise Gjakova Airport J.S.C in consultation with the Assistant Auditor General, Vlora Spanca, who supervised the audit. The report issued is a result of the audit carried out by Team Leader Bahri Statovci and team member Valbona Pllana under the management of the Head of Audit Department Enver Boqolli. NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE-St. Musine Kokollari, No. 87, Prishtina 10000, Kosova Tel: +383(0) 38 60 60 04/1011 http://zka-rks.org 2 ZYRA KOMBËTARE E AUDITIMIT - NACIONALNA KANCELARIJA REVIZIJE - NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • By Order of the Commander Combined Air Operations Center5 (Caoc5)
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED RELEASABLE TO THE PUBLIC BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER COMBINED AIR OPERATIONS CENTER5 (CAOC5) REGULATIONS FOR AIRCRAFT OPERATING AS GENERAL AIR TRAFFIC (GAT) IN THE BALKAN JOINT OPERATION AREA (JOA) VERSION 5 DATED 15 MAR 10. This regulation supercedes version 4.2 dated 01 Jul 07 OPR: Combined Air Operations Center 5 Certified by NATO COMCAOC5 LtGen L. DeVincenti, ITAF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS DOCUMENT IS MANDATORY. Authority: 1. United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 (10 Jun 99). 2. Military Technical Agreement between the signing parties. (KFOR, Govts of Federal Republic of YUGOSLAVIA and SERBIA (now SERBIA and MONTENEGRO) - 9 Jun 99. 3. Helsinki Agreement between the signing parties (US and Russian Federation) – 18 Jun 99 4. General Framework Agreement for Peace in BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA (Initialed by Govts of BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA, CROATIA and the Federal Republic of YUGOSLAVIA –(now SERBIA and MONTENEGRO) 21 Nov 95) 5. Letter of agreement between NATO/SFOR Airspace Control Authority and CROATIA Control Ltd, Zagreb ACC. 6. Agreement for the provision of NATO support to the EU for the command and control for the airspace of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina 01 Dec.2004. 7. Protocol on the release of Bosnia and Herzegovina airspace - Paris, April 20TH, 2007 Request for changes or questions regarding this regulation may be directed to Airliftcaoc5@CAOC5.NATO.INT or the number in the above paragraph. REGULATIONS FOR AIRCRAFT OPERATING AS GENERAL AIR TRAFFIC (GAT) IN THE BALKAN JOA – VERSION 5 EFFECTIVE 15 MAR 10 NATO
    [Show full text]