Biodiversity and Ecology of Lichens of Katmai and Lake Clark National Parks and Preserves, Alaska

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity and Ecology of Lichens of Katmai and Lake Clark National Parks and Preserves, Alaska Mycosphere 9(4): 859–930 (2018) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/9/4/10 Copyright © Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Biodiversity and ecology of lichens of Katmai and Lake Clark National Parks and Preserves, Alaska McCune B1, Arup U2, Breuss O3, Di Meglio E1, Di Meglio J1, Esslinger TL4, Magain N5, Miadlikowska J5, Miller AE6, Muggia L7, Nelson PR8, Rosentreter R9, Schultz M10, Sheard JW11, Tønsberg T12 and Walton J6 1 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Cordley 2082, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 USA 2 Botanical Museum, Lund University, Box 117, 221 00 Lund, Sweden 3 Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Botanische Abteilung, Burgring 7, A-1010 Austria 4 North Dakota State University, Dept. of Biological Sciences #2715, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108 USA 5 Duke University, Dept. of Biology, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708 USA 6 National Park Service, 240 W 5th Ave., Anchorage, Alaska 99501 USA 7 Univ. of Trieste, Dept. Life Sciences, via Giorgieri 10, 34127 Trieste, Italy 8 Arts and Sciences Division, University of Maine at Fort Kent, Fort Kent, Maine 04743, USA 9 Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho 83725 USA 10 Herbarium Hamburgense, Institute for Plant Science and Microbiology, University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststr. 18, D- 22609 Hamburg, Germany 11 Dept. of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 112 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2 Canada 12 Department of Natural History, University Museum, University of Bergen, Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway McCune B, Arup U, Breuss O, Di Meglio E, Di Meglio J, Esslinger TL, Magain N, Miadlikowska J, Miller AE, Muggia L, Nelson PR, Rosentreter R, Schultz M, Sheard JW, Tønsberg T, Walton J 2018 – Biodiversity and ecology of lichens of Katmai and Lake Clark National Parks and Preserves, Alaska. Mycosphere 9(4), 859–930, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/9/4/10 Abstract We inventoried lichens in Lake Clark (LACL) and Katmai (KATM) National Parks and Preserves. We assembled the known information on lichens in these parks by combining field, herbarium, and literature studies. Our results provide baseline data on lichen occurrence that may be used in resource condition assessments, vulnerability assessments, long-term ecological monitoring, and resource management. We report a total of 896 taxa of lichenized fungi from the Parks, adding 889 taxa to the total of seven taxa reported for the Parks by the National Park Service database and including ten new species first published elsewhere. An additional 15 lichenicolous fungi are reported here. Seven non-lichenized fungi associated with young living twigs of particular host species are also included. Sixteen species are new to Alaska, and six species new to North America (Caloplaca fuscorufa, Lecanora leucococca s.l., Ochrolechia brodoi, Protoparmelia memnonia, and Rhizocarpon leptolepis). Four new combinations are made, Cetraria minuscula, Enchylium millegranum var. bachmanianum, Lathagrium undulatum var. granulosum, and Protomicarea alpestris. Additional new species based on collections from the Parks have been described in separate publications. Key words – Alaska Peninsula – Alaska Range – inventory – lichenized fungi – North America Submitted 24 April 2018, Accepted 26 July 2018, Published 21 August 2018 Corresponding Author: McCune Bruce – e-mail – [email protected] 859 Introduction Lichens are a major component of high latitude ecosystems and are highly sensitive to environmental conditions, including airborne contaminants, substrate chemistry, and climate. Such attributes make them useful indicators of species richness (Bergamini et al. 2005) and air quality, including the estimation of critical loads (Geiser & Neitlich 2007, Geiser et al. 2010). Although ecologically important, lichens are a poorly known component within the two largest parks of the Southwest Alaska Network (SWAN), one of 32 Inventory and Monitoring Networks of the National Park Service. Ecosystems in southwest Alaska have an uncertain future, facing climate change and potential new resource development, which may be accompanied by increased pollutant loads. The SWAN parks included in this inventory (Katmai National Park and Preserve; Lake Clark National Park and Preserve) occur on the Alaska Peninsula and fall on a convergence zone of arctic, coastal, and amphiberingean floras. Wilderness areas in the United States are often protected as Class I air quality designations under the Clean Air Act. None of these, however, exists for the Southwest Alaska Network parks. Tuxedni Wilderness, just off the coast of Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, is a Class I area. Routine weekly data collection from a National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) station in King Salmon, Alaska, west of Katmai National Park and Preserve, has occurred since 2013. Samples of the moss, Hylocomium splendens, have been collected at multiple locations in the parks (2009–2012) for nutrient and heavy metal analysis. Given the effectiveness of lichens as indicators of air quality, developing our understanding of lichen diversity, distribution, and abundance within the parks is an important initial strategy for evaluating future air quality issues. The first known lichen collections on the Alaska Peninsula were by the Harriman Expedition in 1899 (Cummings 1904). This expedition made a brief stop at Kukak Bay and resulted in only five specimens; apparently the primary lichen collector on the trip, William Trelease, did not visit Kukak Bay. More specimens were collected on nearby Kodiak Island. Neither of the two most comprehensive treatment of Alaska lichens, Krog (1968), Thomson (1984, 1997) contain much information on the base of the Alaska Peninsula. Krog sampled intensively in southeast Alaska and reported many interesting finds from the Aleutian Islands and the Bering Strait region, but has essentially no information on the intervening region. Thomson (1984, 1997) compiled extensive records of Alaskan lichens, but voluminous collecting trips by him and his colleague, George Scotter, did not include the study area. Thus, Katmai and Lake Clark are hardly represented by his distribution maps and poorly represented in regional treatments of lichens. The most comprehensive community-level study of lichen diversity to date on the Alaska Peninsula was conducted in the Aniakchak caldera, Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve (ANIA; Hasselbach 1995), but this was restricted to macrolichens. Lichen collections in the remaining parks on the Alaska Peninsula have been limited to those from short field trips in Katmai National Park and Preserve (henceforth “Katmai” or KATM), including small collections from Hallo Bay, Lake Brooks, Valley of Ten Thousand Smokes, Hammersly Lake, Kukaklek Lake, and Lake Camp area (Schindler 1990, Berg 2006) and from opportunistic collections and plot-based sampling associated with vegetation monitoring in interior Lake Clark National Park and Preserve (henceforth “Lake Clark” or LACL) and Katmai (Miller et al. 2006, 2010, 2011). A detailed inventory of lichens was also conducted on Chisik and Duck Islands, in the Tuxedni Wilderness, off of the coast of LACL (Talbot et al. 1992), apparently the first major collection effort in the western Cook Inlet region. East and south of the study area Spribille et al. (2010) thoroughly documented lichens of Klondike Gold Rush National Historic Park, which includes sea-level coastal forests and outcrops up to oceanic alpine tundra. North and east of the study area Stehn et al. (2015) listed lichens of the Denali National Park region. Several species of conservation concern have been found in spruce woodland and open forest at Katmai in recent years (e.g., Erioderma pedicellatum, Hypogymnia pulverata; Nelson et al. 2011) and in woodlands, coastal spruce, and fellfield ridges at Lake Clark (e.g., Hypogymnia pulverata, Cetrelia alaskana). To date, however, most habitats in the parks have not been sampled, 860 and comprehensive nonvascular species lists for SWAN parks do not exist. Alpine areas, calcareous outcrops, old-growth forest, and coastal forest were habitats expected to support high species richness, but were underrepresented in the existing collections. We inventoried lichens at Katmai and Lake Clark with the goals of (1) expanding the list of species known to occur in the parks; (2) compiling a reference collection of voucher specimens and associated habitat data; (3) compiling the associated geospatial data into a geodatabase; and (4) providing supplementary ecological data (e.g., functional groups) to extend the results of the inventories. The last of those was reported separately (Spickerman 2015). Some of the results of this study have already been reported elsewhere (Sheard et al. 2014, Arup et al. 2015, Fryday & Tønsberg 2015, Magain et al. 2016, McCune et al. 2016, Sheard 2018, Tønsberg 2018) and more are forthcoming. The purpose of the current publication is to present a comprehensive treatment of the lichens of these parks, bringing together results from all participants. Study Area Katmai and Lake Clark National Park and Preserves (NPPs) lie at the base of the Alaska Peninsula, south and west of Anchorage (Fig. 1). Most visitor use is concentrated in a few areas, specifically bear viewing areas at Brooks Camp and on the coasts of Lake Clark and Katmai NPPs, and at the historic Dick Proenneke’s cabin in Lake Clark NPP, leaving much of the remainder of the parks in nearly pristine condition. Combined, the parks and preserves
Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Material for Nelson, P. R., B. Mccune & D. K. Swanson
    Supplementary material for Nelson, P. R., B. McCune & D. K. Swanson. 2015. Lichen traits and species as indicators of vegetation and environment. The Bryologist 118(3): XX–XX. Supplementary Table S2. Trait matrix (alphabetical by species). “1” indicates a species possesses that trait. cladoniiform Filamentous Squamulose Cyano Erect Appressed 3D s branched Tripartite Fruticose Terricole Epiphyte Lignicole Saxicole p soredia lobules Foliose Simple foliose Green rawlin isida foliose Lichen Species Subspecies richly Only g Alectoria ochroleuca 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Allantoparmelia almquistii 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Allantoparmelia alpicola 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Allocetraria madreporiformis 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Anaptychia bryorum 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Arctoparmelia centrifuga 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Arctoparmelia incurva 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Arctoparmelia separata 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Arctoparmelia subcentrifuga 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Asahinea chrysantha 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Baeomyces carneus 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baeomyces placophyllus 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baeomyces rufus 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blennothallia crispa 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Brodoa oroarctica 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Bryocaulon divergens 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Bryoria capillaris 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Bryoria chalybeiformis 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
    [Show full text]
  • The Lichens' Microbiota, Still a Mystery?
    fmicb-12-623839 March 24, 2021 Time: 15:25 # 1 REVIEW published: 30 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.623839 The Lichens’ Microbiota, Still a Mystery? Maria Grimm1*, Martin Grube2, Ulf Schiefelbein3, Daniela Zühlke1, Jörg Bernhardt1 and Katharina Riedel1 1 Institute of Microbiology, University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany, 2 Institute of Plant Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, Graz, Austria, 3 Botanical Garden, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany Lichens represent self-supporting symbioses, which occur in a wide range of terrestrial habitats and which contribute significantly to mineral cycling and energy flow at a global scale. Lichens usually grow much slower than higher plants. Nevertheless, lichens can contribute substantially to biomass production. This review focuses on the lichen symbiosis in general and especially on the model species Lobaria pulmonaria L. Hoffm., which is a large foliose lichen that occurs worldwide on tree trunks in undisturbed forests with long ecological continuity. In comparison to many other lichens, L. pulmonaria is less tolerant to desiccation and highly sensitive to air pollution. The name- giving mycobiont (belonging to the Ascomycota), provides a protective layer covering a layer of the green-algal photobiont (Dictyochloropsis reticulata) and interspersed cyanobacterial cell clusters (Nostoc spec.). Recently performed metaproteome analyses Edited by: confirm the partition of functions in lichen partnerships. The ample functional diversity Nathalie Connil, Université de Rouen, France of the mycobiont contrasts the predominant function of the photobiont in production Reviewed by: (and secretion) of energy-rich carbohydrates, and the cyanobiont’s contribution by Dirk Benndorf, nitrogen fixation. In addition, high throughput and state-of-the-art metagenomics and Otto von Guericke University community fingerprinting, metatranscriptomics, and MS-based metaproteomics identify Magdeburg, Germany Guilherme Lanzi Sassaki, the bacterial community present on L.
    [Show full text]
  • Domenico Puntillo & Sonia Ravera Naetrocymbe Mori
    Fl. Medit. 23: 5-9 doi: 10.7320/FlMedit23.005 Version of Record published online on 30 December 2013 Domenico Puntillo & Sonia Ravera Naetrocymbe mori-albae, a new species from Calabria (Southern Italy) Abstract Puntillo, D. & Ravera S.: Naetrocymbe mori-albae, a new species from Calabria (Southern Italy). — Fl. Medit. 23: 5-9. 2013. — ISSN: 1120-4052 printed, 2240-4538 online. The new taxon belongs to the group Arthopyrenia rhyponta-A. punctiformis, recently trans- ferred to the problematic genus Naetrocymbe Korb. (Naetrocymbaceae Höhn. ex R.C. Harris), as it is a non or weakly lichenized group. This species is characterized by tadpole-shaped 1-sep- tate ascospores with a conical lower cell and perithecia which are 4-8 linearly arranged. Key words: Naetrocymbe, Lichenes, Italy. Introduction Naetrocymbe is a genus of pyrenocarpous ascomycetes belonging to the family Naetrocymbaceae establish by Harris (1995). This family includes species usually not lichen-forming and characterized by short-celled paraphyses with refractive bodies near the septa, obpyriform asci with a distinctive apical region lacking a nasse and short rod- shaped microconidia. It has a mainly temperate/boreal distribution. Because of some Naetrocymbe species can be lichenized (Keissler 1938; Knudsen & Lendemer 2009; Roux 2009), Aptroot (1998, 2002), Coppins (2002) and Coppins & Orange (2009) consider unnecessary a separation between Naetrocymbe and Arthopyrenia. They disagree with Harris (1973, 1975, 1995), Tucker & Harris (1980) and Coppins (1988), about the impor- tance of the hamathecial tissues as valuable character. In Aptroot’s opinion, the cosmopol- itan genus Arthopyrenia s.l. should be considered in its original wide concept: character- ized by branched pseudoparaphyses, which may disappear, and sole-shaped ascospores.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycosphere Notes 225–274: Types and Other Specimens of Some Genera of Ascomycota
    Mycosphere 9(4): 647–754 (2018) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/9/4/3 Copyright © Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Mycosphere Notes 225–274: types and other specimens of some genera of Ascomycota Doilom M1,2,3, Hyde KD2,3,6, Phookamsak R1,2,3, Dai DQ4,, Tang LZ4,14, Hongsanan S5, Chomnunti P6, Boonmee S6, Dayarathne MC6, Li WJ6, Thambugala KM6, Perera RH 6, Daranagama DA6,13, Norphanphoun C6, Konta S6, Dong W6,7, Ertz D8,9, Phillips AJL10, McKenzie EHC11, Vinit K6,7, Ariyawansa HA12, Jones EBG7, Mortimer PE2, Xu JC2,3, Promputtha I1 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 2 Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, China 3 World Agro Forestry Centre, East and Central Asia, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, Yunnan Province, People’s Republic of China 4 Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan 655011, China 5 Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China 6 Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand 7 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 8 Department Research (BT), Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, BE-1860 Meise, Belgium 9 Direction Générale de l'Enseignement non obligatoire et de la Recherche scientifique, Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, Rue A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska A, , Frank Kauff B,1, Filip Högnabba C, Jeffrey C
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10, Soili Stenroos c,10 a Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA b FB Biologie, Molecular Phylogenetics, 13/276, TU Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany c Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland d Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 358 ESC, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA e Institut für Botanik, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Holteigasse 6, A-8010 Graz, Austria f Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdan´sk, ul. Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdan´sk, Poland g Science and Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kaleigh Spickerman for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on June 11, 2015 Title: Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Bruce McCune Functional traits of vascular plants have been an important component of ecological studies for a number of years; however, in more recent times vascular plant ecologists have begun to formalize a set of key traits and universal system of trait measurement. Many recent studies hypothesize global generality of trait patterns, which would allow for comparison among ecosystems and biomes and provide a foundation for general rules and theories, the so-called “Holy Grail” of ecology. However, the majority of these studies focus on functional trait patterns of vascular plants, with a minority examining the patterns of cryptograms such as lichens. Lichens are an important component of many ecosystems due to their contributions to biodiversity and their key ecosystem services, such as contributions to mineral and hydrological cycles and ecosystem food webs. Lichens are also of special interest because of their reliance on atmospheric deposition for nutrients and water, which makes them particularly sensitive to air pollution. Therefore, they are often used as bioindicators of air pollution, climate change, and general ecosystem health. This thesis examines the functional trait patterns of lichens in two contrasting regions with fundamentally different kinds of data. To better understand the patterns of lichen functional traits, we examined reproductive, morphological, and chemical trait variation along precipitation and temperature gradients in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred New Species of Lichenized Fungi: a Signature of Undiscovered Global Diversity
    Phytotaxa 18: 1–127 (2011) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Monograph PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2011 Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) PHYTOTAXA 18 One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: a signature of undiscovered global diversity H. THORSTEN LUMBSCH1*, TEUVO AHTI2, SUSANNE ALTERMANN3, GUILLERMO AMO DE PAZ4, ANDRÉ APTROOT5, ULF ARUP6, ALEJANDRINA BÁRCENAS PEÑA7, PAULINA A. BAWINGAN8, MICHEL N. BENATTI9, LUISA BETANCOURT10, CURTIS R. BJÖRK11, KANSRI BOONPRAGOB12, MAARTEN BRAND13, FRANK BUNGARTZ14, MARCELA E. S. CÁCERES15, MEHTMET CANDAN16, JOSÉ LUIS CHAVES17, PHILIPPE CLERC18, RALPH COMMON19, BRIAN J. COPPINS20, ANA CRESPO4, MANUELA DAL-FORNO21, PRADEEP K. DIVAKAR4, MELIZAR V. DUYA22, JOHN A. ELIX23, ARVE ELVEBAKK24, JOHNATHON D. FANKHAUSER25, EDIT FARKAS26, LIDIA ITATÍ FERRARO27, EBERHARD FISCHER28, DAVID J. GALLOWAY29, ESTER GAYA30, MIREIA GIRALT31, TREVOR GOWARD32, MARTIN GRUBE33, JOSEF HAFELLNER33, JESÚS E. HERNÁNDEZ M.34, MARÍA DE LOS ANGELES HERRERA CAMPOS7, KLAUS KALB35, INGVAR KÄRNEFELT6, GINTARAS KANTVILAS36, DOROTHEE KILLMANN28, PAUL KIRIKA37, KERRY KNUDSEN38, HARALD KOMPOSCH39, SERGEY KONDRATYUK40, JAMES D. LAWREY21, ARMIN MANGOLD41, MARCELO P. MARCELLI9, BRUCE MCCUNE42, MARIA INES MESSUTI43, ANDREA MICHLIG27, RICARDO MIRANDA GONZÁLEZ7, BIBIANA MONCADA10, ALIFERETI NAIKATINI44, MATTHEW P. NELSEN1, 45, DAG O. ØVSTEDAL46, ZDENEK PALICE47, KHWANRUAN PAPONG48, SITTIPORN PARNMEN12, SERGIO PÉREZ-ORTEGA4, CHRISTIAN PRINTZEN49, VÍCTOR J. RICO4, EIMY RIVAS PLATA1, 50, JAVIER ROBAYO51, DANIA ROSABAL52, ULRIKE RUPRECHT53, NORIS SALAZAR ALLEN54, LEOPOLDO SANCHO4, LUCIANA SANTOS DE JESUS15, TAMIRES SANTOS VIEIRA15, MATTHIAS SCHULTZ55, MARK R. D. SEAWARD56, EMMANUËL SÉRUSIAUX57, IMKE SCHMITT58, HARRIE J. M. SIPMAN59, MOHAMMAD SOHRABI 2, 60, ULRIK SØCHTING61, MAJBRIT ZEUTHEN SØGAARD61, LAURENS B. SPARRIUS62, ADRIANO SPIELMANN63, TOBY SPRIBILLE33, JUTARAT SUTJARITTURAKAN64, ACHRA THAMMATHAWORN65, ARNE THELL6, GÖRAN THOR66, HOLGER THÜS67, EINAR TIMDAL68, CAMILLE TRUONG18, ROMAN TÜRK69, LOENGRIN UMAÑA TENORIO17, DALIP K.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Diversification Events in the Caliciaceae
    Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae Maria Prieto1,2 & Mats Wedin1 Received: 21 December 2015 /Accepted: 19 July 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Although the high degree of non-monophyly and Calicium pinicola, Calicium trachyliodes, Pseudothelomma parallel evolution has long been acknowledged within the occidentale, Pseudothelomma ocellatum and Thelomma mazaediate Caliciaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota), a brunneum. A key for the mazaedium-producing Caliciaceae is natural re-classification of the group has not yet been accom- included. plished. Here we constructed a multigene phylogeny of the Caliciaceae-Physciaceae clade in order to resolve the detailed Keywords Allocalicium gen. nov. Calicium fossil . relationships within the group, to propose a revised classification, Divergence time estimates . Lichens . Multigene . and to perform a dating study. The few characters present in the Pseudothelomma gen. nov available fossil and the complex character evolution of the group affects the interpretation of morphological traits and thus influ- ences the assignment of the fossil to specific nodes in the phy- Introduction logeny, when divergence time analyses are carried out. Alternative fossil assignments resulted in very different time es- Caliciaceae is one of several ascomycete groups characterized timates and the comparison with the analysis based on a second- by producing prototunicate (thin-walled and evanescent) asci ary calibration demonstrates that the most likely placement of the and a mazaedium (an accumulation of loose, maturing spores fossil is close to a terminal node rather than a basal placement in covering the ascoma surface).
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Allied Fungi of the Indiana Forest Alliance
    2017. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 126(2):129–152 LICHENS AND ALLIED FUNGI OF THE INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE ECOBLITZ AREA, BROWN AND MONROE COUNTIES, INDIANA INCORPORATED INTO A REVISED CHECKLIST FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA James C. Lendemer: Institute of Systematic Botany, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458-5126 USA ABSTRACT. Based upon voucher collections, 108 lichen species are reported from the Indiana Forest Alliance Ecoblitz area, a 900 acre unit in Morgan-Monroe and Yellowwood State Forests, Brown and Monroe Counties, Indiana. The lichen biota of the study area was characterized as: i) dominated by species with green coccoid photobionts (80% of taxa); ii) comprised of 49% species that reproduce primarily with lichenized diaspores vs. 44% that reproduce primarily through sexual ascospores; iii) comprised of 65% crustose taxa, 29% foliose taxa, and 6% fruticose taxa; iv) one wherein many species are rare (e.g., 55% of species were collected fewer than three times) and fruticose lichens other than Cladonia were entirely absent; and v) one wherein cyanolichens were poorly represented, comprising only three species. Taxonomic diversity ranged from 21 to 56 species per site, with the lowest diversity sites concentrated in riparian corridors and the highest diversity sites on ridges. Low Gap Nature Preserve, located within the study area, was found to have comparable species richness to areas outside the nature preserve, although many species rare in the study area were found only outside preserve boundaries. Sets of rare species are delimited and discussed, as are observations as to the overall low abundance of lichens on corticolous substrates and the presence of many unhealthy foliose lichens on mature tree boles.
    [Show full text]
  • <I> Lecanoromycetes</I> of Lichenicolous Fungi Associated With
    Persoonia 39, 2017: 91–117 ISSN (Online) 1878-9080 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.05 Phylogenetic placement within Lecanoromycetes of lichenicolous fungi associated with Cladonia and some other genera R. Pino-Bodas1,2, M.P. Zhurbenko3, S. Stenroos1 Key words Abstract Though most of the lichenicolous fungi belong to the Ascomycetes, their phylogenetic placement based on molecular data is lacking for numerous species. In this study the phylogenetic placement of 19 species of cladoniicolous species lichenicolous fungi was determined using four loci (LSU rDNA, SSU rDNA, ITS rDNA and mtSSU). The phylogenetic Pilocarpaceae analyses revealed that the studied lichenicolous fungi are widespread across the phylogeny of Lecanoromycetes. Protothelenellaceae One species is placed in Acarosporales, Sarcogyne sphaerospora; five species in Dactylosporaceae, Dactylo­ Scutula cladoniicola spora ahtii, D. deminuta, D. glaucoides, D. parasitica and Dactylospora sp.; four species belong to Lecanorales, Stictidaceae Lichenosticta alcicorniaria, Epicladonia simplex, E. stenospora and Scutula epiblastematica. The genus Epicladonia Stictis cladoniae is polyphyletic and the type E. sandstedei belongs to Leotiomycetes. Phaeopyxis punctum and Bachmanniomyces uncialicola form a well supported clade in the Ostropomycetidae. Epigloea soleiformis is related to Arthrorhaphis and Anzina. Four species are placed in Ostropales, Corticifraga peltigerae, Cryptodiscus epicladonia, C. galaninae and C. cladoniicola
    [Show full text]
  • Opuscula Philolichenum, 6: 87-120. 2009
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 6: 87–120. 2009. Lichenicolous fungi and some lichens from the Holarctic 1 MIKHAIL P. ZHURBENKO ABSTRACT. – 102 species of lichenicolous fungi and 23 lichens are reported, mainly from the Russian Arctic. Four new taxa are described: Clypeococcum bisporum (on Cetraria and Flavocetraria), Echinodiscus kozhevnikovii (on Cetraria), Stigmidium hafellneri (on Flavocetraria) and Gypsoplaca macrophylla f. blastidiata. The following lichenicolous fungi are reported for the first time from North America: Monodictys fuliginosa, Stigmidium microcarpum and Trichosphaeria lichenum. The following lichenicolous fungi and lichens are reported as new to Asia: Arthonia almquistii, Arthophacopsis parmeliarum, Cercidospora lobothalliae, Clypeococcum placopsiphilum, Dactylospora cf. aeruginosa, D. frigida, Epicladonia sandstedei, Everniicola flexispora, Hypogymnia fistulosa, Lecanora luteovernalis, Lecanographa rinodinae, Lichenochora mediterraneae, Lichenopeltella peltigericola, Lichenopuccinia poeltii, Lichenosticta alcicornaria, Phoma cytospora, Polycoccum ventosicola, Roselliniopsis gelidaria, R. ventosa, Sclerococcum gelidarum, Scoliciosporum intrusum, Stigmidium croceae, S. mycobilimbiae, S. stygnospilum, S. superpositum, Taeniolella diederichiana, Thelocarpon impressellum and Zwackhiomyces macrosporus. Twenty-eight species are new to Russia, 15 new to the Arctic, five new to Mongolia and nine new to Alaska. Twenty lichen genera and 31 species are new hosts for various species of lichenicolous fungi. INTRODUCTION This paper deals
    [Show full text]