The 2012 Aspen Ideas Festival
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Service Year a Cultural Expectation, a Common Opportunity, and a Civic Rite of Passage for Every Young American
A SERVICE YEAR A CULTURAL EXPECTATION, A COMMON OPPORTUNITY, AND A CIVIC RITE OF PASSAGE FOR EVERY YOUNG AMERICAN THE VISION The Franklin Project envisions a future in which a year of full-time national service — a service year — is a cultural expectation, a common opportunity, and a civic rite of passage for every young American. Each person can fulfill his or her national service obligation by joining the military or by completing a full-time civilian service year through programs such as Teach for America, AmeriCorps, and the Peace Corps, or any eligible nonprofit. A modest living allowance would be provided for the service year, which would be completed at some point between the ages of 18-28. THEORY OF THE FRANKLIN PROJECT We believe that spending a year in full-time service is a transformative experience for young citizens and future leaders. We’re focused on promoting a service year as a civic rite of passage because it will connect individuals to something bigger than themselves and to the idea that citizenship requires more from each of us than is currently expected. A generation of Americans spending a year in full-time service will unleash a reservoir of human capital to tackle pressing social challenges, unite diverse Americans in common purpose, and cultivate the next generation of leaders. HOW IT WILL WORK: A NEW RITE OF PASSAGE INTO ADULTHOOD RECRUIT SERVE CONNECT ATTRACTRECRUIT YOUNG PEOPLE TO THE PLACE 18- TO 28- YEAR-OLDS INTO ATTACH FULL-TIME SERVICE TO SERVICE YEAR EXPERIENCE SERVICE YEAR POSITIONS EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION CONTEXT In 2011, AmeriCorps CONTEXT Nonprofits and federal, CONTEXT Service years are an asset had 580,000 applications for 80,000 state, and local governments to career and adult development, positions, and studies show recognize national service as a rather than an interruption — and that millennials are increasingly cost-effective solution to meet their service year alumni make better inclined to serve, volunteering at missions, and colleges have already employees and more mature students. -
Steve, Attached You Will Find an Agenda for the 3
Steve, Attached you will find an agenda for the 3 day leadership training I received as part of the Aspen Institute/Franklin Project Ambassador/Fellowship. I was recently selected as an Ambassador/Fellow. The fellowship is an unpaid year-long fellowship supported by the Aspen Institute to promote National service which includes service in the Military and Public Service. 50 Ambassadors/Fellows were chosen from across the United States and all Ambassadors were at the 3 day training. I previously served in two Americorps programs; City Year and Public Allies. The Franklin Project envisions a future in which a year of full-time national service is a cultural expectation, a common opportunity, and a civic rite of passage for every young American. The Aspen Institute/Franklin Project Aspen Institute (Ambassadors) is leading the effort to improve citizenship by giving every young person in America the opportunity to serve. Sometime between the ages of 18 and 28, the young person would do a fully paid, full-time year of service in one of an array of areas, including health, poverty, conservation, or education. These young people will not only do good work and solve problems, but they will also become better young Americans. Let me know if you have any questions. Mark Payne Franklin Project Ambassadors Program Training and Seminar Agenda June 22-24, 2015 Alexandria, VA Monday 22 June 2015 12:30 – 1:00 pm Arrival Participants arrive at McChrystal Group Headquarters. Snacks and mingling. 1:00 – 1:15 pm Kickoff Welcome, objectives of the training, agenda review, logistics review. -
LANHEE J. CHEN 434 Galvez Mall Stanford, CA 94305
LANHEE J. CHEN 434 Galvez Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6010 EDUCATION 2000-2009 Harvard University, Faculty of Arts & Sciences, Department of Government Ph.D. in Political Science conferred June 2009 A.M. in Political Science conferred June 2004 2004-2007 Harvard Law School J.D. cum laude conferred June 2007 1995-1999 Harvard College A.B. magna cum laude in Government conferred June 1999 RESEARCH AND ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2013-Present David and Diane Steffy Fellow in American Public Policy Studies Hoover Institution Stanford University 2013-Present Lecturer in Public Policy, Public Policy Program Stanford University 2014-Present Director of Domestic Policy Studies, Public Policy Program Stanford University 2019-Present Affiliated Faculty, Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies Stanford University 2014-2019 Affiliate, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies Stanford University 2017 William E. Simon Distinguished Visiting Professor School of Public Policy Pepperdine University 2014-2018 Lecturer in Law Stanford Law School 2010-2011 Visiting Scholar, Institute of Governmental Studies University of California, Berkeley 2003-2005 Teaching Fellow, Department of Government Harvard University Last Updated: March 1, 2020 Chen, L.J., Page 2 of 16 RESEARCH INTERESTS US Health Policy (particularly market-based reform; Medicare and Medicaid; health insurance; and interactions between payers and providers) Comparative Health Policy (particularly Singapore and Taiwan) Retirement Security Policy Policy Formation and Implementation Campaigns and Elections US-China relations PUBLICATIONS Church, Tom, Daniel L. Heil, and Lanhee J. Chen. 2020. “The Fiscal Effects of the Public Option.” Washington, DC: Partnership for America’s Health Care Future. -
Aspen Ideas Festival Confirmed Speakers
Aspen Ideas Festival Confirmed Speakers Carol Adelman , President, Movers and Shakespeares; Senior Fellow and Director, Center for Global Prosperity, The Hudson Institute Kenneth Adelman , Vice President, Movers and Shakespeares; Executive Director, Arts & Ideas Series, The Aspen Institute Stephen J. Adler , Editor-in-Chief, BusinessWeek Pamela A. Aguilar , Producer, Documentary Filmmaker; After Brown , Shut Up and Sing Madeleine K. Albright , founder, The Albright Group, LLC; former US Secretary of State; Trustee, The Aspen Institute T. Alexander Aleinikoff , Professor of Law and Dean, Georgetown University Law Center Elizabeth Alexander , Poet; Professor and Chair, African American Studies Department, Yale University Yousef Al Otaiba , United Arab Emirates Ambassador to the United States Kurt Andersen , Writer, Broadcaster, Editor; Host and Co-Creator, Public Radio International’s “Studio 360” Paula S. Apsell , Senior Executive Producer, PBS’s “NOVA” Anders Åslund , Senior Fellow, Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics Byron Auguste , Senior Partner, Worldwide Managing Director, Social Sector Office, McKinsey & Company Dean Baker , Co-Director, Center for Economic and Policy Research; Columnist, The Guardian ; Blogger, “Beat the Press,” The American Prospect James A. Baker III , Senior Partner, Baker Botts, LLP; former US Secretary of State Bharat Balasubramanian , Vice President, Group Research and Advanced Engineering; Product Innovations & Process Technologies, Daimler AG Jack M. Balkin , Knight Professor of Constitutional -
This Transcript Was Exported on Sep 24, 2020 - View Latest Version Here
This transcript was exported on Sep 24, 2020 - view latest version here. support message: This podcast is supported by the Walton Family Foundation. The Walton Family Foundation is at its core, a family led foundation, working to create access to opportunity for people and communities. The foundation partners with others to make a difference in K-12 education, the environment and its home region of Northwest Arkansas in the Arkansas Mississippi Delta. Learn more at waltonfamilyfoundation.org. Tricia Johnson: It's Aspen Ideas to Go from the Aspen Institute. I'm Trisha Johnson. Today we're featuring a conversation with Supreme Court Associate Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg from our archives. She died Friday. Ginsburg served as the second woman on the nation's highest court and was a champion of justice and steadfast advocate for civil and human rights. Her musical love was opera, yet her late in life status as a powerful cultural icon to a younger generation is more akin to a rockstar than a diva. Tricia Johnson: In 2018, a law student dubbed her the notorious RBG and the moniker consumed the internet and popular culture. Her wit and playful sense of humor are on full display in this conversation. Ruth Bader Ginsburg: And sad for me, I am a monotone. So I sing in only two places, one is the shower and the other is my dreams. Tricia Johnson: Aspen Ideas to Go brings you compelling conversations from the Aspen Institute. Today's show features Ginsburg speaking to the Aspen Wye Fellows in 2017 about her book, My Own Words. -
2015 Transparency Report
2015 Gifts, Grants and Program Support by Program (25K and over) CONSTITUENT NAME PROGRAM GIFT/GRANT ANONYMOUS NON- TOTAL AMOUNT GIFTS CHARITABLE SUPPORT Coulter 2006 Management Trust Aspen Community Programs $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Laurie M. Tisch Illumination Fund Aspen Community Programs $68,000.00 $68,000.00 Murdock, Jerry Aspen Community Programs $75,000.00 $75,000.00 Aspen Community Programs Total $168,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $168,000.00 Resnick, Lynda R. Administration $75,000.00 $75,000.00 Administration Total $75,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $75,000.00 Annie E. Casey Foundation Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $600,000.00 $600,000.00 Bank of America Charitable Foundation Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $50,000.00 $50,000.00 California Endowment Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $250,000.00 $250,000.00 Casey Family Programs Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $300,000.00 $300,000.00 Ford Foundation Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $400,000.00 $400,000.00 Gap Foundation Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Greater Texas Foundation Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Helios Education Foundation Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $400,000.00 $400,000.00 John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $100,000.00 $100,000.00 JPMorgan Chase Global Philanthropy Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $2,000,000.00 $2,000,000.00 Lumina Foundation Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Starbucks Coffee Company Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Marguerite Casey Foundation Aspen Forum for Community Solutions $125,000.00 $125,000.00 Conrad N. -
Download 2017 Support by Program
The Aspen Institute has prepared an accounting of restricted charitable and program support, listing all payments $25,000 and over. The list is sorted by Aspen Institute program. This accounting includes all restricted program gifts, grants, non-charitable sponsorships and other types of program revenue. Unrestricted support is not included in this document. CONSTITUENT NAME PROGRAM GIFT/GRANT AMOUNT ANONYMOUS GIFTS* NON-CHARITABLE SUPPORT The Angelo Family Charitable Foundation Arts Program $25,000.00 Arnhold Foundation Arts Program $25,000.00 The Eisner Foundation Arts Program $375,000.00 Ford Foundation Arts Program $100,000.00 Jane & Marc Nathanson Family Foundation Arts Program $25,000.00 Leonard Lauder Arts Program $25,000.00 The Laurie M. Tisch Foundation Inc. Arts Program $25,000.00 Millstone Family Charitable Trust Arts Program $25,000.00 Robert H. Smith Family Foundation Arts Program $50,000.00 Roger Sant Arts Program $50,000.00 Arts Program Total $725,000.00 Ann B. and Thomas L. Friedman Family Foundation Ascend $50,000.00 Annie E. Casey Foundation Ascend $200,000.00 Charlotte Perret Family Trust Ascend $300,000.00 David and Lucile Packard Foundation Ascend $350,000.00 Ford Foundation Ascend $100,000.00 JB and MK Pritzker Family Foundation Ascend $50,000.00 The Kresge Foundation Ascend $500,000.00 The Morgridge Family Foundation Ascend $264,910.00 The Richard W. Goldman Family Foundation Ascend $350,000.00 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Ascend $990,327.00 Two-Generation Approach Fund of the Community Foundation Ascend $50,000.00 of Sarasota County Walton Family Foundation Ascend $215,605.00 W.K. -
Franklin Project's Plan of Action
Generi Corp Inc Management Report Table of Contents A Declaration of Service 1 Executive Summary 5 A Plan of Action: A 21st Century National Service System 12 Core Elements of a 21st Century National Service System 12 Pathways to Engage More Americans in National Service 22 A Talent Pipeline through National Service 25 The Case for National Service 28 National Service to Address National Challenges 33 Conclusion 38 Acknowledgments 38 Endnotes 39 A Declaration of Service We, the undersigned, endorse the Franklin Project's Plan of Action to establish a 21st Century National Service System in America that inspires and engages at least one million young adults annually from all socio- economic backgrounds in a demanding year of full-time national service as a civic rite of passage to unleash the energy and idealism of each generation to address our nation’s challenges. General Stanley McChrystal Michael Brown Leadership Council Chair, The Franklin Project; U.S. Co-Founder and CEO, City Year Army General (Retired); Former Commander, International Security Assistance Force & U.S. Forces Afghanistan Anna Burger Former Secretary-Treasurer, SEIU; Former Chair, Change to Win Madeleine Albright Chair, Albright Stonebridge Group; Former U.S. Secretary of State & U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Barbara Bush Co-Founder and CEO, Global Health Corps Don Baer Worldwide Chair and CEO, Burson-Marsteller; Former Jean Case White House Director of Strategic Planning and CEO, The Case Foundation; Former Chair, President's Communications Council on Service and Civic Participation Melody Barnes Ray Chambers Chair, Aspen Forum for Community Solutions and UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Financing of Opportunity Youth Incentive Fund; Vice Provost for the Health Related Millennium Development Goals & for Global Student Leadership Initiatives, New York Malaria; Co-Founder, America's Promise Alliance; Chair, University; Former Director, White House Domestic The MCJ Amelior Foundation Policy Council AnnMaura Connolly Samuel R. -
Corporation for National and Community Service Minutes of the Board of Directors Meeting October 3, 2016 3:05 P.M
Corporation for National and Community Service Minutes of the Board of Directors Meeting October 3, 2016 3:05 p.m. – 3:52 p.m., ET The Board of Directors for the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) convened in Washington, DC. The following members of the Board were present: Shamina Singh, Chair Rick Christman (by telephone) Mona Dixon (by telephone) Chair’s Opening Remarks Board Chair Shamina Singh called the meeting to order and welcomed everyone joining by phone and those gathered in person at the CNCS Headquarters. She welcomed her fellow Board members Rick Christman and Mona Dixon; Vice Chair Dean Reuter, Eric Liu, and Victoria Hughes were unavailable for the meeting. She extended greetings to those observing Rosh Hashanah and thanked Board members for participating in CNCS activities and events. She stated that Eric participated in an event in Washington State that showcased the Social Innovation Fund, and will be on hand for that state’s annual AmeriCorps induction later this month, when 1,000 new members will be sworn in. She also stated that Mona recently did a site visit to the Maricopa Integrated Health Systems in Arizona, and Victoria attended some of the Social Innovation Fund convening last month. Ms. Singh invited members of the public, on behalf of the Board, to comment on the business of the Board. Ms. Singh noted that the Board met via conference call last week. During the call, Wendy Spencer gave a detailed CEO report, which she will share today. Jeff Page, the Chief Operations Officer, gave an update on operations and our Enterprise Risk Management strategy. -
Challenge to Presidential Candidates
ow more than ever, America needs citizens • Establish service year opportunities as a of all backgrounds who are willing to come pathway to higher education and careers together and tackle the many problems facing by increasing education awards and loan Nour communities. We can start by offering every forgiveness for those who serve, making those young American the opportunity to complete a education awards tax-free, creating incentives service year, which will help solve today’s challenges for higher education institutions to recognize and prepare tomorrow’s leaders. and reward service years, and recruiting service year alumni into federal jobs. A service year is a substantial, sustained, full-time commitment that is supported with a modest living • Encourage states, communities, and nonprofit allowance and other benefits. It is organized to have organizations to create service year positions to a real, measurable community impact while making a solve locally identified problems by partnering lasting difference in the lives of those who serve. with the Service Year Exchange, a new private sector technology platform designed to Today, there are approximately 65,000 full-time connect individuals who want to serve with service year opportunities, including national service certified publicly and privately funded service positions that receive federal funding through year positions. AmeriCorps, the Peace Corps, and YouthBuild – Service year opportunities have a bipartisan programs where corps members help students in presidential and congressional legacy, enjoy low-income schools succeed, preserve national parks, overwhelming support from American voters of all fight poverty, and rebuild neighborhoods in the wake party affiliations, are sought by young adults, and of natural disasters. -
Middle-Out for Millennials Creating Jobs for Young People
Middle-Out for Millennials Creating Jobs for Young People By Sarah Ayres and Molly Dillon November 4, 2013 Introduction The latest employment figures from the U.S. Department of Labor show that young Americans continue to be left behind in America’s plodding economic recovery. At 14.8 percent, the unemployment rate for workers under the age of 25 is more than twice the national rate of 7.2 percent.1 According to our research, each unemployed young worker today will go on to earn $22,000 less over the next 10 years due to reduced wages.2 And youth unemployment is not just a youth problem—its fiscal and economic conse- quences have the potential to hold back America’s growth for years to come. As docu- mented in the Center for American Progress report “America’s 10 Million Unemployed Youth Spell Danger for Future Economic Growth,” the American economy is not work- ing for Millennials.3 Millennials’ parents and grandparents, when they were the same age as today’s Millennials, had a decent shot at achieving middle-class goals, such as owning a home, providing for a family, retiring securely, and indulging in the occasional vacation or dinner out. But today, too many Millennials are unemployed, drowning in debt, and lucky to just make ends meet each month. The economic challenges facing young people are serious, but the right set of policies can create opportunities for this generation and help ensure America’s long-term prosperity. An economy that works for Millennials is one that expands and strengthens the middle class—and that starts with ensuring that young Americans who want to work are able to find a job. -
Workforce Development Strategy
AP PHOTO/J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE SCOTT PHOTO/J. AP Utilizing National Service as a 21st Century Workforce Strategy for Opportunity Youth By Tracey Ross, Shirley Sagawa, and Melissa Boteach March 2016 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Utilizing National Service as a 21st Century Workforce Strategy for Opportunity Youth By Tracey Ross, Shirley Sagawa, and Melissa Boteach March 2016 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 5 Workers facing barriers to employment 9 Benefits of national service to disadvantaged workers 11 The existing foundation for national service 16 Why now is the time to grow national service as a workforce development strategy 20 Recommendations 28 Conclusion 30 Endnotes Introduction and summary At the height of the Great Depression, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt created the Civilian Conservation Corps, or CCC, as part of the New Deal. The CCC pro- vided critically needed jobs to unskilled young men while implementing a natural resource conservation program on public lands across the country.1 Over the course of nine years, nearly 3 million young men participated in the CCC, earning wages, food, shelter, and skills while planting more than 3 billion trees, combating forest fires, and providing aid in the wake of natural disasters.2 Today, national service programs—voluntary programs supported through publicly and privately funded stipends and designed to foster leadership through sustained service that meets public needs—have played a critical role in the lives of millions of Americans. Over the past 50 years, leaders from both sides of the aisle have supported service to meet goals of national significance. As a result, national service has been instru- mental in tackling important challenges facing families and communities, such as addressing underperforming schools and rehabilitating housing for low-income families.