Study Material
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cashew, from Seed to Market: a Review Bianca Dendena, Stefano Corsi
Cashew, from seed to market: a review Bianca Dendena, Stefano Corsi To cite this version: Bianca Dendena, Stefano Corsi. Cashew, from seed to market: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 2014, 34 (4), pp.753-772. 10.1007/s13593-014- 0240-7. hal-01234842 HAL Id: hal-01234842 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01234842 Submitted on 27 Nov 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Agron. Sustain. Dev. (2014) 34:753–772 DOI 10.1007/s13593-014-0240-7 REVIEW ARTICLE Cashew, from seed to market: a review Bianca Dendena & Stefano Corsi Accepted: 8 July 2014 /Published online: 30 July 2014 # INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2014 Abstract Cashew is a tropical tree native to South America. Contents Cashew was introduced in Asia and Africa by European explorers in the sixteenth century. The world production of 1. Introduction....................................1 cashew raw nuts reached 4.27 million tons in 2011. Vietnam is 2. Botanicaldescription.............................2 the top producer of raw nuts, and India is the first processor 3. Originanddiffusion............................4 and exporter of processed nuts. The cashew market is expect- 4. -
AESA Based IPM – Brinjal
AESA BASED IPM Package No.22 AESA based IPM – Brinjal Pests Defenders Directorate of Plant Protection National Institute of Plant Health National Centre for Quarantine and Storage Management Integrated Pest Management N. H. IV, Faridabad, Haryana Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, A. P LBS Building, IARI Campus, New Delhi Department of Agriculture and Cooperation Ministry of Agriculture Government of India 1 The AESA based IPM - Brinjal, was compiled by the NIPHM working group under the Chairmanship of Dr. K. Satyagopal DG, NIPHM, and guidance of Shri. Utpal Kumar Singh JS (PP). The package was developed taking into account the advice of experts listed below on various occasions before finalization. NIPHM Working Group: Chairman : Dr. K. Satyagopal, IAS, Director General Vice-Chairmen : Dr. S. N. Sushil, Plant Protection Advisor : Dr. P. Jeyakumar, Director (PHM) Core Members : 1. Er. G. Shankar, Joint Director (PHE), Pesticide Application Techniques Expertise. 2. Dr. O. P. Sharma, Joint Director (A & AM), Agronomy Expertise. 3. Dr. Dhana Raj Boina, Assistant Director (PHM), Entomology Expertise. 4. Dr. Richa Varshney, Assistant Scientific Officer (PHM), Entomology Expertise. Other Members : 1. Dr. Satish Kumar Sain, Assistant Director (PHM), Pathology Expertise. 2. Dr. N. Srinivasa Rao, Assistant Director (RPM), Rodent Pest Management Expertise. 3 Dr. B. S. Sunanda, Assistant Scientific Officer (PHM), Nematology Expertise. Contributions by DPPQ&S Experts: 1. Shri. Ram Asre, Additional Plant Protection Advisor (IPM), 2. Dr. K. S. Kapoor, Deputy Director (Entomology), 3. Dr. Sanjay Arya, Deputy Director (Plant Pathology), 4. Dr. Subhash Kumar, Deputy Director (Weed Science) 5. Dr. C. S. Patni, Plant Protection Officer (Plant Pathology) Contributions by External Experts: 1. -
The Library of the University of California
fi - w AG R I C U LT U RAL PES T S OF I N DI A , ‘ AN D OF E I AS T ER N AN D S OU T HER N AS A. O O AN D G I BB M RRIS N , ' P E r' o H ER J Y S T AT I ON ER Y OF F C E RINT RS MA EST S I . AGRICULTURAL PESTS OF A INDI , AN D OF EAS T ER N AN D S OU T HER N A IA S , VEG ET ABLE AN D AN I MAL , I N JUR I OUS T O MAN AN D HI S PR OD U C T S . R EON EN ER AL ED WAR D BALF OU R S U G G , C O E PO D G B OF T H E I MPER I AL -R OY AL G OL OG C L I N S T I T U T E V E RR S N IN MEM ER E I A , I NNA ; FELLOW OF T H E M AD R AS U NIVERSIT Y ; AU T H OR OF “ ’ m mC YC L OPE D OF I N D I A AN D O F EAS T ER N AN D OU HE A S I A IA S T RN , “ ’ rm: B T EES OF I N D I A AN D OF AN D OU H S ma TIM ER ! EASTERN S T ERN A IA , ; F OU N D ER OF T H E G OVER N MEN T C EN T R AL U U MAD R A S M SE M, ; OF T H E MYS OR E U U B G LO ET C . -
Western Ghats), Idukki District, Kerala, India
International Journal of Entomology Research International Journal of Entomology Research ISSN: 2455-4758 Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 www.entomologyjournals.com Volume 3; Issue 2; March 2018; Page No. 114-120 The moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of vagamon hills (Western Ghats), Idukki district, Kerala, India Pratheesh Mathew, Sekar Anand, Kuppusamy Sivasankaran, Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu* Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract The present study was conducted at Vagamon hill station to evaluate the biodiversity of moths. During the present study, a total of 675 moth specimens were collected from the study area which represented 112 species from 16 families and eight super families. Though much of the species has been reported earlier from other parts of India, 15 species were first records for the state of Kerala. The highest species richness was shown by the family Erebidae and the least by the families Lasiocampidae, Uraniidae, Notodontidae, Pyralidae, Yponomeutidae, Zygaenidae and Hepialidae with one species each. The results of this preliminary study are promising; it sheds light on the unknown biodiversity of Vagamon hills which needs to be strengthened through comprehensive future surveys. Keywords: fauna, lepidoptera, biodiversity, vagamon, Western Ghats, Kerala 1. Introduction Ghats stretches from 8° N to 22° N. Due to increasing Arthropods are considered as the most successful animal anthropogenic activities the montane grasslands and adjacent group which consists of more than two-third of all animal forests face several threats (Pramod et al. 1997) [20]. With a species on earth. Class Insecta comprise about 90% of tropical wide array of bioclimatic and topographic conditions, the forest biomass (Fatimah & Catherine 2002) [10]. -
Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths
Chapter 8 Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths J. Joe Hull and Adrien Fónagy Abstract Sexual communication among the vast majority of moths typically involves the synthesis and release of species-specifc, multicomponent blends of sex pheromones (types of insect semiochemicals) by females. These compounds are then interpreted by conspecifc males as olfactory cues regarding female reproduc- tive readiness and assist in pinpointing the spatial location of emitting females. Studies by multiple groups using different model systems have shown that most sex pheromones are synthesized de novo from acetyl-CoA by functionally specialized cells that comprise the pheromone gland. Although signifcant progress was made in identifying pheromone components and elucidating their biosynthetic pathways, it wasn’t until the advent of modern molecular approaches and the increased avail- ability of genetic resources that a more complete understanding of the molecular basis underlying pheromonogenesis was developed. Pheromonogenesis is regulated by a neuropeptide termed Pheromone Biosynthesis Activating Neuropeptide (PBAN) that acts on a G protein-coupled receptor expressed at the surface of phero- mone gland cells. Activation of the PBAN receptor (PBANR) triggers a signal trans- duction cascade that utilizes an infux of extracellular Ca2+ to drive the concerted action of multiple enzymatic steps (i.e. chain-shortening, desaturation, and fatty acyl reduction) that generate the multicomponent pheromone blends specifc to each species. In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of moth sex pheromones before expanding on the molecular mechanisms regulating pheromonogenesis, and con- clude by highlighting recent developments in the literature that disrupt/exploit this critical pathway. J. J. Hull (*) USDA-ARS, US Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA e-mail: [email protected] A. -
Helopeltis Spp.) on Cashew (Anacardium Occidentale Linn.
Journal of Cell and Animal Biology Vol. 6(14), pp. 200-206, September 2012 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/JCAB DOI: 10.5897/JCAB11.094 ISSN 1996-0867 ©2012 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Field survey and comparative biology of tea mosquito bug (Helopeltis spp.) on cashew (Anacardium occidentale Linn.) Srikumar K. K.1* and P. Shivarama Bhat2 Department of Entomology, Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur, Karnataka 574 202, India. Accepted 8 August, 2012 Cashew (Anacardium occidentale Linn.) has become a very important tree crop in India. Several insect pests, however, have been recorded on cashew and prominent among which is the tea mosquito bug (TMB), Helopeltis spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae). Field survey from November 2009 to November 2011 suggests that Helopeltis antonii was dominant, which accounted for 82% of all Helopeltis spp. collected; whereas, Helopeltis bradyi and Helopeltis theivora accounted for 12 and 6%, respectively. No significant differences in egg hatchability percentage among the three species were observed. The study showed that there is significant variation in developmental rate of 2nd, 3rd and 4th instar nymphs of Helopeltis spp. The total developmental time for H. antonii, H. bradyi and H. theivora were 224.19, 211.38 and 214.59 hours, respectively. Survival rates of the nymphal instars of H. antonii were significantly high compared to H. bradyi and H. theivora. The sex ratio of H. antonii was highly female biased. The adults of H. bradyi and H.theivora survived longer and produced significantly higher number of eggs than H. antonii. The outcome of this study is very important in planning control as insect monitoring and biological studies are important components of Integrated Pest Management (IPM). -
Bugs R All FINAL Apr 2014 R
ISSN 2230 ! 7052 Newsletter of the $WIU4#NNInvertebrate Conservation & Information Network of South Asia (ICINSA) No. 21, April 2014 Photo: Aniruddha & Vishal Vishal Aniruddha & Photo: Contents Pages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`'%,"*4"5';*a'"9)'.%$,'4+"8*(#-,L"b;*&'/$L"U*>7+*"?$*>%,7" ;5#82.'7-2#$'/B<&L'#'67#0"#4"#0'G """## """## """# """## """## """## """ """## """## """## """#"""""""""""""""""""""@PH"WQ 6'/&/2+"/0"47%"(/47"7&#"-"'#*%".43*#",""8$*(%$"B^%#'>/#4%$*C"^*,'/=*(#'>*%E"/)"F)>'*)"6*>*("D$%%.0&*8%-"5%".,"#"$$" -
Pest and Diseases in Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) J
PEST AND DISEASES IN MANGO (MANGIFERA INDICA L.) J. González-Fernández, J.I. Hormaza IHSM la Mayora CSIC-UMA, 29750 Algarrobo, Malaga, Spain EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this work, we review the most important pests and diseases that affect mango production worldwide as well as the main measures implemented to control them. Pests and diseases are the main factors that can impact sustainable mango fruit production in the tropics and subtropics worldwide. Commercial cultivation of mango, characterized by expansion to new areas, changing crop management, replacement of varieties and increased chemical interventions, has altered significantly the pest and disease community structure in this crop in the different mango producing regions. In addition, climate change is inducing the emergence of new pests and, whereas globalization and trade liberalization have created wide opportunities for mango commercialization growth, at the same time, this can result in faster dispersion of pests and diseases among different mango growing areas if proper sanitary measures are not implemented. This review covers different topics related to pests and diseases in mango. First, a thorough description of the main pests and diseases that affect mango is provided. Second, the different approaches used in different mango producing countries for chemical and biological control are described. Third, recommendations for appropriate mango management techiques that include integrated pest and disease management, reduction in the use of chemicals and the implementation of a good monitoring and surveillance system to help control the main pests and diseases, are also discussed. Finally, the current knowledge on agrohomeopathy and Korean Natural Farming is analyzed and recommendations on future lines of research to optimize mango pest and disease control are discussed. -
Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld. -
Pacific Islands: Their Culture, (Syzygium Cumini) [Negative Impacts on Cultivation of Bananas] Environment, and Use
Family: Myrtaceae Taxon: Syzygium cumini Synonym: Eugenia cumini (L.) Druce Common Name jambolan Eugenia jambolana Lam. Malabar plum Myrtus cumini L. (basionym) jamélongue Syzygium jambolanum (Lam.) DC. Jambolanapflaume Caryophyllus jambos Stokes guayabo pesgua Java plum Questionaire : current 20090513 Assessor: Chuck Chimera Designation: H(Hawai'i) Status: Assessor Approved Data Entry Person: Chuck Chimera WRA Score 9 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? y=1, n=-1 103 Does the species have weedy races? y=1, n=-1 201 Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If island is primarily wet habitat, then (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High substitute "wet tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" high) (See Appendix 2) 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2- High high) (See Appendix 2) 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y 204 Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates y=1, n=0 y 205 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2), n= question 205 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see n Appendix 2) 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see y Appendix 2) 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs -
Insect Pests of Vegetables
DATE- 18/03/2020 (LECTURE 3) Insect Pests of Vegetables Pests of brinjal Shoot and fruit borer (Leuciniodes orbonalis Guenee, Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Key Identification- The Major host plants of the pest is Brinjal This pest is reported from regions of brinjal cultivation in Africa, South of the Sahara, and South-East Asia including India, Bangladesh, Srilanka, China and Philippines. Young caterpillars are creamy white, while full-grown are light pinkish and measure about 18-23 mm in length. The moth is medium sized with white wings having triangular brown and red markings on the forewings. The moth measures bout 20-22 mm across the wings. Life cycle- A female moth lays about 80-120 creamy white eggs, singly or in batches of 2-4 on the underside of leaves, on green stems, flowers buds or the calyces of fruits during its life span of 2-5 days. The incubation period is 3-6 days. The young caterpillars bore into the tender shoots near the growing points, flower buds or the fruits. There are five larval instars and mature in 14-20 days, depending on the prevailing temperature and humidity. A single caterpillar may destroy as many as 4-6 fruits. The larva comes out of the damaged shoot or fruit and pupates in a tough gray cocoon in soil or plant debris. The pupal period is 6-11 days. During the active season, the total life cycle is completed in 20-43 days. There are five overlapping generations in a year. Damage- The larvae bore into the petiole and midribs of large leaves and tender shoots and cause wilting. -
Studies on Insect Pests of Drumstick and Their Natural Enemies in Northern Dry Zone Climate of Karnataka, India
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(12): 2175-2180 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 9 Number 12 (2020) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.912.257 Studies on Insect Pests of Drumstick and their Natural Enemies in Northern Dry Zone Climate of Karnataka, India K. B. Rachana1, S. B. Jagginavar1*, H. T. Prakash2 and S. A. Biradar2 1Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, India 2ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Vijayapur, Karnataka, UAS, Dharwad, (Karnataka), India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT K e yw or ds Studies on status of insect pests on drumstick crop and their natural enemies were Drumstick, Noorda conducted at College of Agriculture campus, Vijayapur which is located in Northern dry zone climate of Karnataka. The population dynamics of insect pests on drumstick blitealis, Thrips, Natural enemies etc field was recorded throughout season (2018-19). The results revealed that, the insect pests viz., leaf eating caterpillar, Noorda blitealis Walker larvae found throughout the st Article Info year. The Maximum population (10.24 larvae /5 branches) was recorded during 51 Standard Meteorological Week (December). Thrips infestation was observed Accepted: throughout the year and maximum population (16.40 thrips /5 branches) was recorded 16 November 2020 th during 20 Standard Meteorological Week (May). Other insect viz., coccinellids, Available Online: praying mantid, spiders (Non insect) and parasitoid