Cultural Heritage

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural Heritage Non-technical summary (NTS) 1: Introduction 2: Site description and development proposal 3: Environmental issues and methodology 4: Air quality 6 5: Community and social effects 6: Cultural6: heritage:Cultural heritage: designated designated heritage heritage assets assets 7: Cultural heritage: undesignated heritage assets 8: Hydrology and water quality 9: Land use 10: Landscape and visual effects 11: Natural heritage 12: Noise and vibration 13: Traffic and transport 14: Summary tables 15: Future development Glossary King’s Gate, Amesbury ES Chapter 6: Cultural heritage - designated heritage assets Bloor Homes Ltd 6 Cultural heritage - designated heritage assets Introduction 6.1 This chapter considers the impacts of the proposed development at King’s Gate, Amesbury on the designated elements of the historic environment: scheduled monuments, listed buildings, and area designations covering historic town centres, designed landscapes and the Stonehenge, Avebury and associated sites world heritage site. Legislation and policy 6.2 National and international policy recognises the value and significance of cultural heritage and the public interest in the preservation of particular assets, and sets out mechanisms to ensure that it is taken into account in planning decision making. Sites and features of identified interest are protected by the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, as amended, and within the planning system by the Town and Country Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. As a State Party to the 1972 UNESCO Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (the World Heritage Convention), the UK is required to protect, conserve, present and transmit to future generations its world heritage sites. 6.3 National planning policy guidance on the conservation of the historic environment is provided by Planning Policy Statement 5: Planning for the Historic Environment (PPS5), published in March 2010. Guidance on implementation of this policy is provided in the accompanying Planning for the Historic Environment Practice Guide. The objectives of the PPS are to conserve the historic environment for its own intrinsic value and to take account in decision making of its potential instrumental value for place making and contribution to sustainable development. Designated and undesignated heritage assets are distinguished from the wider definition of historic environment, the majority of which is not covered by protective designations. Specific protection within the planning system applies to world heritage sites, through the Circular for England on the Protection of World Heritage Sites and related guidance (2010). 6.4 Detailed policies on development management concern the need to clearly define the significance of any potentially affected site or area, the pre- application information requirements for any proposals, including for archaeological field evaluation, and the principles to be considered in determining any proposal for change potentially affecting heritage assets. There is an overall requirement to gather sufficient information to ensure an adequate understanding of the significance of an asset before any decisions affecting its future are made. A key concept in the PPS is that of proportionality; that the information required, efforts to preserve, and degree of public benefits necessary to offset any harm or loss of an asset should be based on an understanding of its significance. Terence O’Rourke Ltd March 2012 151004d King’s Gate, Amesbury ES Chapter 6: Cultural heritage - designated heritage assets Bloor Homes Ltd 6.5 The relevant planning policies regarding cultural heritage are set out in the Salisbury Local Plan 2011. Conservation policies are CN5 on development potentially affecting the setting of a listed building, CN11 on the effects of new development on conservation areas, CN18 on development affecting historic parks and gardens, CN20 - 23 on the archaeological implications of new development and CN24 on development affecting the Stonehenge WHS. 6.6 A number of additional documents are relevant to this assessment. The Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan (2009) sets out the strategy for the protection of the outstanding universal value of the 2,600 hectare inscribed area. Its primary aim is the protection of the archaeological landscape, but it also addresses other issues such as access, farming and local community. The plan explains the international significance of the site, outlines the key management issues and provides long term aims and detailed policies. Wiltshire Council has adopted the management plan as supplementary guidance and it is a material consideration in determining planning applications that affect the Stonehenge WHS. 6.7 The Settlement Setting Assessment (CBA, 2008) produced as part of the Salisbury district landscape character assessment considers the key sensitivities of the landscape to development and change, with particular reference to the setting of the area’s main settlements. The Salisbury Historic Environment Assessment (Land Use Consultants, 2009) produced for English Heritage extends that assessment to give greater consideration to impacts on the historic environment. The report assesses likely implications for the historic environment of a number of development proposals, one of which is the Archers Gate allocation. Methodology 6.8 The EIA has included both desk based work and a programme of archaeological evaluation (see chapter 7 for the assessment of on site archaeology). The desk-based studies assess the cultural heritage of the site and its environs as it appears in existing information through designation, the national or local archaeological record, documentary sources or other studies. A site visit was undertaken on 12 January 2012 to inform the baseline and to validate the impact assessment. The study area covers the proposed application site itself and a 5 kilometre radius, to allow the consideration of the potential for any regional-scale effects. The data sources consulted are outlined in table 6.1. All designated heritage assets are illustrated on figures 6.1 to 6.3 and listed in the gazetteers in technical appendix C1. Terence O’Rourke Ltd March 2012 151004d King’s Gate, Amesbury ES Chapter 6: Cultural heritage - designated heritage assets Bloor Homes Ltd CBA, Salisbury District Landscape Character Assessment: Settlement Setting Assessment 2008 Communities and Local Government 2010 Planning Policy Statement 5: Planning for the Historic Environment Dyer C, The archaeology of medieval small towns, Medieval Archaeology, Vol 47, 2003 English Heritage 2009 Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan English Heritage 2008 Conservation principles – policies and guidance for the sustainable management of the historic environment English Heritage, 2011, The setting of heritage assets: English Heritage guidance, http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/ http://list.english-heritage.org.uk Institute of field archaeologists 2008 Standards and guidance for archaeological desk based assessments Lambrick G, 2008 Setting Standards; A Review, IFA working group on the setting of cultural heritage features Lambrick, G. and Hind, J. 2005 Planarch 2: Review of Cultural Heritage Coverage in Environmental Impact Assessments Oxford Archaeology Land Use Consultants for English Heritage, April 2009, Salisbury Historic Environment Assessment Lane, R, 2011, Stonehenge World Heritage Site Landscape Project; Architectural Assessment, English Heritage Research Department Report Series no 42-2011 Pevsner N and Cherry B, Buildings of England; Wiltshire 1975 Roberts, B.K. and Wrathmell, S., 2000, An Atlas of Rural Settlement in England, English Heritage Publications Salisbury District Council, Amesbury Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan September 2008 Salisbury District Council, Durrington Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan, September 2008 Salisbury District Local Plan 2011 Table 6.1 Data sources consulted 6.9 The chapter makes use of the ZVI and viewpoint photographs produced for the landscape and visual effects assessment in chapter 10. In order to gain an appreciation of the theoretical extent the proposed development may extend to, and potentially interact with the designated archaeological assets within the 5 km study area (see figure 6.1), the ZVI (figure 10.5) was applied to the cultural heritage designations (figure 6.8). The model is based on available data including Lidar data from the Environment Agency (flown January 2011) across the site and western study area at 1metre accuracy. This height data takes account of extant development and woodland and adds a level of accuracy to the theoretical visibility model, an essential consideration in an assessment in close proximity to such a significant WHS landscape. Further detail on the methodology of the ZVI modelling is presented in annex 1 of chapter 10. All viewpoint photographs are taken from publicly accessible locations. There are currently no detailed proposals; the only parameters for the EIA are the master plan layout, building heights, density, access and landscape strategy figures 2.1 to 2.5. Terence O’Rourke Ltd March 2012 151004d King’s Gate, Amesbury ES Chapter 6: Cultural heritage - designated heritage assets Bloor Homes Ltd Scope of work 6.10 The intention of the assessment is to provide a description of the likely value, extent, state of preservation and potential significance of the designated heritage assets within the wider 5 km
Recommended publications
  • A303 Stonehenge E
    1 A303 Stonehenge e m Amesbury to Berwick Down u l o V Report on Public Consultation September 2017 A303 Stonehenge, Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive summary 2 Background context 2 Scheme proposals presented for consultation 2 Consultation arrangements 3 Consultation response 3 Key considerations 5 Effectiveness and benefits of consultation 6 1 Introduction 7 2 A303 Stonehenge: Amesbury to Berwick Down Scheme proposals 9 2.1 Scheme proposals 9 3 How we undertook consultation 11 3.1 When we consulted 11 3.2 Who we consulted 11 3.3 How consultation was carried out 15 4 Overview of consultation feedback 20 4.1 General 20 4.2 Breakdown of total responses 20 4.3 Questionnaire responses: Questions 1-4 21 4.4 Themes arising from comments made against Questions 1-7 23 4.5 Feedback data from Questions 8-10 24 5 Matters raised and Highways England response 27 5.1 General 27 5.2 Matters raised by the public with Highways England’s response 27 5.3 Responses by statutory bodies 107 5.4 Responses by non-statutory organisations and other groups 115 5.5 Matters raised by statutory bodies and non-statutory organisations and groups with Highways England’s response 153 5.6 Matters raised by landholders with Highways England’s response 170 6 Summary of Feedback and Key Considerations 190 6.1 Summary of consultation feedback 190 6.2 Key considerations 197 7 Conclusions 199 7.1 Purpose of the consultation 199 7.2 Summary of what was done 199 7.3 Did the consultation achieve its purpose? 201 Abbreviations List 203 Glossary 204 Appendices 207 Page 1 of 207 A303 Stonehenge, Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Executive summary Background context The A303 Stonehenge scheme is part of a programme of improvements along the A303 route aimed at improving connectivity between London and the South East and the South West.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Outline Assessment of the Impact of A303 Improvements On
    Preliminary Outline Assessment of the impact of A303 improvements on the Outstanding Universal Value of the Stonehenge Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage property Nicola Snashall BA MA PhD MIfA National Trust Christopher Young BA MA DPhil FSA Christopher Young Heritage Consultancy August 2014 ©English Heritage and The National Trust Preliminary Outline Impact Assessment of A303 improvements on the Outstanding Universal Value of the Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage property August 2014 Executive Summary The Government have asked the Highways Agency to prepare feasibility studies for the improvement of six strategic highways in the UK. One of these is the A303 including the single carriageway passing Stonehenge. This study has been commissioned by English Heritage and the National Trust to make an outline preliminary assessment of the potential impact of such road improvements on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property. A full impact assessment, compliant with the ICOMOS guidance and with EU and UK regulations for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) would be a much larger task than this preliminary assessment. It would be prepared by the promoter of a road scheme and would require more supporting material and more detailed analysis of impacts. The present study is an outline preliminary assessment intended to inform the advice provided by the National Trust and English Heritage to the Highways Agency and the Department for Transport. It deals only with impact on Outstanding Universal Value and does not examine impacts on nationally or locally significant heritage. The objectives of the study can be summarised as: 1. Review changes in international and national policy and in our understanding of the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property to set the context for the assessment of impact of potential options for improvement of the A303; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge A303 Improvement: Outline Assessment of the Impacts
    Stonehenge A303 improvement: outline assessment of the impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property of potential route options presented by Highways England for January 2017 Nicola Snashall BA MA PhD MCIfA National Trust Christopher Young BA MA DPhil FSA Christopher Young Heritage Consultancy January 2017 ©Historic England and the National Trust Stonehenge A303 improvements: outline assessment of the impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property of potential route options presented by Highways England for January 2017 Executive Summary Introduction In 2014, English Heritage (now Historic England) and the National Trust commissioned an assessment (Snashall, Young 2014) on the potential impact of new road options, including a tunnel, for the A303 within the Stonehenge component of the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage property. Since at that time, there were no detailed proposals, that report considered four possible alternatives and concluded that, of these, an off-line route with a tunnel of 2.9kms length would be the most deliverable solution. The government remains committed to improving the A303 and to funding sufficient for a tunnel of at least 2.9kms length within the World Heritage property. Highways England are consulting in early 2017 on route options developed since 2014 for this road scheme through the World Heritage property and bypassing Winterbourne Stoke village to the west. This report is an outline assessment of these initial options on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the World Heritage property. It has been commissioned to assess the impact of the latest road options in the light of updated archaeological information.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic of Europe.Indb
    THE NEOLITHIC OF EUROPE PAPERS IN HONOUR OF ALASDAIR WHITTLE THE NEOLITHIC OF EUROPE PAPERS IN HONOUR OF ALASDAIR WHITTLE Edited by PENNY BICKLE, VICKI CUMMINGS, DANIELA HOFMANN AND JOSHUA POLLARD Oxford & Philadelphia Published in the United Kingdom in 2017 by OXBOW BOOKS The Old Music Hall, 106–108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JE and in the United States by OXBOW BOOKS 1950 Lawrence Road, Havertown, PA 19083 © Oxbow Books and the individual authors 2017 Hardcover Edition: ISBN 978-1-78570-654-7 Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-78570-655-4 (epub) A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library and the Library of Congress All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the publisher in writing. Printed in Malta by Gutenberg Press Ltd Typeset in India by Lapiz Digital Services, Chennai For a complete list of Oxbow titles, please contact: UNITED KINGDOM Oxbow Books Telephone (01865) 241249, Fax (01865) 794449 Email: [email protected] www.oxbowbooks.com UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Oxbow Books Telephone (800) 791-9354, Fax (610) 853-9146 Email: [email protected] www.casemateacademic.com/oxbow Oxbow Books is part of the Casemate Group Front cover: Alleskoven dolmen, Denmark (Vicki Cummings). Back cover: La Table des Marchands, France (Vicki Cummings); a reconstructed LBK longhouse in the Paris basin (Penny Bickle); Carrowmore, Ireland (Vicki Cummings); an excavation in progress at the Herpaly tell, Hungary (Pál Raczky).
    [Show full text]
  • A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Heritage Impact
    A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Heritage Impact Assessment Scoping Report February 2018 A303 Stonehenge | HE551506 Table of contents Chapter Pages 1 Executive summary 2 2 Introduction 3 3 Outline description of the proposed development 4 4 Summary of the conditions present on the site and its environs 17 5 Statement of Outstanding Universal Value 20 6 Assessment of Scheme alternatives 28 7 Consultation 32 8 Potential Scheme impacts on the WHS and its OUV 34 9 Outline methodology and terms of reference for the HIA 38 10 Likely sensitive receptors related to attributes of OUV 55 11 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures 60 12 Assessment of cumulative effects 62 13 References 64 Abbreviations 69 Glossary 71 Appendix A – Retrospective Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (SoOUV), 2013 74 Appendix B – A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Heritage Monitoring and Advisory Group (HMAG) and the Scientific Committee Terms of Reference 80 1 A303 Stonehenge | HE551506 1 Executive summary 1.1.1 This Heritage Impact Assessment Scoping Report sets out the scope of the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site (WHS No. C373) located in Wiltshire, England, UK in relation to the proposed A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down road improvement project (‘the Proposed Scheme’). The Stonehenge element of the World Heritage property is located within the parishes of Durrington, Shrewton, Amesbury, Winterbourne Stoke and Wilsford cum Lake. The property was inscribed on the World Heritage List in 1986, on the nomination of the UK Government. This HIA Scoping Report follows the guidelines recommended by ICOMOS (Advisory Body to the World Heritage Committee), in particular the 2011 ICOMOS Guidance on Heritage Impact Assessments for Cultural World Heritage Properties [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Age to Iron Age W4
    Stone Age to Iron Age Worksheet 4A Name: _____________________________ Date: ____________________ Go on a fact hunt and find out as much about Stonehenge as you can to help you answer these questions. 1. In what period of the Stone Age was 2. What are the two types of stones 3. In what year were the first stones put Stonehenge built? called that were used to make up at Stonehenge? Stonehenge? 4. Where is Stonehenge? 7. What does Stonehenge look like today? Draw a picture. 5. Which river runs near Stonehenge? 6. What are the barrows around Stonehenge for? Copyright © PlanBee Resources Ltd 2013 www.planbee.com Stone Age to Iron Age Worksheet 4B Name: _____________________________ Date: ____________________ Go on a fact hunt and find out as much about Stonehenge as you can to help you answer these questions. 1. During which period was 2. Where is Stonehenge? 3. Which river runs near 4. How tall are the sarsen Stonehenge built? Stonehenge? stones of Stonehenge? 5. How heavy are the 6. When were the ditches and 9. What does Stonehenge look like today? Draw a picture. bluestones of Stonehenge? banks of Stonehenge built? 7. When were the first stones of 8. Where does the sun rise Stonehenge put into place? during the summer solstice at Stonehenge? Copyright © PlanBee Resources Ltd 2013 www.planbee.com Stone Age to Iron Age Worksheet 4C Name: _____________________________ Date: ____________________ Go on a fact hunt and find out as much about Stonehenge as you can to help you answer these questions. 1. During which period 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum Addressing 'New Discovery'
    A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down TR010025 Additional submission Heritage Impact Assessment – Addendum addressing ‘new discovery’ responding to Secretary of State letter dated 16 July 2020 APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 August 2020 Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 5 1 Introduction 6 2 Heritage Impact Assessment method 8 2.1 Data sources 8 2.2 Published works 8 2.3 Scope of assessment 9 2.4 Evaluation of heritage resource 11 2.5 Assessment of scale of specific impact and change 14 2.6 Evaluation of overall impact 14 2.7 Matters considered in this HIA Addendum 15 2.8 Natural and cultural features 15 2.9 Referencing of heritage assets 17 3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 9 4 Baseline information: the Durrington Walls discovery 19 4.1 WHS history and description 19 4.2 Description of new discovery associated with Durrington Walls Henge 19 4.3 Assessment of significance of Durrington Walls discovery 23 4.4 The Durrington Walls discovery and WHS inscription criteria 40 5 Other large pit-like geophysical anomalies in the landscape 43 5.1 Discrete and isolated heritage assets including pits 43 5.2 Description of other large pit-like geophysical anomalies in the landscape 43 5.3 Assessment of significance of other large pit-like anomalies in the landscape 48 6 Mitigation 54 7 Impacts of A303 Scheme 56 8 Impact assessment on the Attributes which convey the OUV of the WHS, Integrity and Authenticity 57 9 Conclusions 59 10 References 60 Figures 66 Abbreviations List 67 Glossary 69 Page 2 of 71 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down| HE551506-AMW-EHR-SW_GN_000_Z-RP-LH-6000499 Table of Tables Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 the Vision for Stonehenge
    Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 The Vision for Stonehenge The Stonehenge World Heritage Site is globally important not just for Stonehenge, but for its unique and dense concentration of outstanding prehistoric monuments and sites, which together form a landscape without parallel. We will care for and safeguard this special area and its archaeology and will provide a more tranquil, biodiverse and rural setting for it, allowing present and future generations to enjoy it and the landscape more fully. We will also ensure that its special qualities are presented, interpreted and enhanced where necessary, so that visitors can better understand the extraordinary achievements of the prehistoric peoples who left us this rich legacy. Rachel Foster 2003 © English Heritage Stonehenge is the focus of a complex of prehistoric monuments and sites Cover Stonehenge and its surroundings Sky Eye aerial photography 2004 © English Heritage Photo Library K040312 Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 Written and compiled by Christopher Young, Amanda Chadburn and Isabelle Bedu Published in January 2009 by English Heritage on behalf of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site Committee © English Heritage 2009 English Heritage, 1 Waterhouse Square, 138–142 Holborn, London EC1N 2ST ISBN: 978-1-84802-041-2 CONTENTS Page FOREWORD 6 PREFACE 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 8 PART 1: THE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STONEHENGE WORLD HERITAGE SITE 9 1.0 Function of the World Heritage Site Management Plan 11 1.1 The need for the Plan 11 1.2
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge OUV Impacts Assessment 3
    Stonehenge A303 improvement: Addendum to outline assessment of the impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property of potential route options presented by Highways England for January 2017 Assessment of route option D081C Nicola Snashall BA MA PhD MCIfA National Trust Christopher Young BA MA DPhil FSA Christopher Young Heritage Consultancy March 2017 ©Historic England and the National Trust Stonehenge A303 improvement: addendum assessing route option D081C final draft Executive Summary Following a public consultation exercise in early 2017, Highways England have developed a further route option, D081C, for the A303 from the western tunnel portal to the western boundary of the Stonehenge World Heritage property. This report has been commissioned by Historic England and the National Trust to inform their response to this proposal. It describes and analyses only the impacts of option D081C and must be read in conjunction with our earlier report (Snashall and Young 2017), which contains our assessment of the remainder of the route and our overall evaluation of its impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property as a whole. Route D081C as proposed by Highways England - D081C (2) - postulates a western tunnel exit just to the south of the current A303 close to the Normanton Down barrow group. The below-ground section of the road is extended by a 300m long canopy (Fig. 3). From that exit, the new dual carriageway, utilising a shallow fold in the landscape, diverges slightly from the present line of the A303 and crosses the World Heritage boundary to the south of the present A303/ A360 junction.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge World Heritage Site
    Report to Wiltshire Council by Alan Boyland BEng(Hons) DipTP CEng MICE MCIHT MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Council assisted by John Wilde CEng MICE Date : 16 November 2011 ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 THE COUNTY OF WILTSHIRE (STONEHENGE WORLD HERITAGE SITE, PARISHES OF AMESBURY, BERWICK ST JAMES, DURRINGTON, WILSFORD CUM LAKE, WINTERBOURNE STOKE AND WOODFORD) (PROHIBITION OF DRIVING) ORDER 2010 Inquiry Opened: 22 June 2011 Ref: DPI/T3915/11/20 REPORT TO WILTSHIRE COUNCIL FILE REF: DPI/T3915/11/20 Prohibition of Driving Order at Stonehenge ___________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS CASE DETAILS ............................................................................................. 1 1. PREAMBLE ............................................................................................ 1 Appointment ....................................................................................... 1 Background to the Order ...................................................................... 1 Publication and Consultations ............................................................... 2 The Inquiry ........................................................................................ 2 This Report ......................................................................................... 4 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE ROAD & BOATS AND THEIR SURROUNDINGS ............................................................ 4 3. CONSULTATION RESPONSES ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Highways England
    NOTES / LEGEND Indicative centreline ± Proposed tunnel Proposed scheme boundary Asset Groups World Heritage Site AG14 AG37 AG06 AG39 AG10 AG38 AG20 AG25 AG15 AG33 AG11 AG28 AG36 AG23 AG34 AG26A AG08 AG18 AG27 AG31A AG04 AG07 AG31B AG31C AG22 AG26B AG03 AG17 AG21 AG21 AG30 AG19A AG12 AG35 AG24 AG32 AG29 AG19B AG05 AG13 AG19C AG01 AG02 AG19D Asset Group Number Asset Group Name AG01 Yarnbury Camp and Parsonage Down Camp © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance AG09 AG02 Scotland Lodge Survey 100030649. AG16 AG03 Winterbourne Stoke West Barrows and Coniger Enclosure AG04 Winterbourne Stoke East Barrows and Enclosure AG05 Winterbourne Stoke Hill Ring Ditches By AG06 Net Down Barrow Cemetery Revision Details Date Suffix AG07 Romano-British Settlement on Winterborne Stoke Down Check AG08 Winterbourne Stoke Down Barrows Purpose of issue AG09 Oatlands Hill FINAL AG10 Rollestone Barrows Client AG11 Lesser Cursus Barrows and Pit Circle Highways England AG12 Winterbourne Stoke Crossroads Barrows AG13 The Diamond Barrows AG14 Robin Hood's Ball and Associated Sites AG15 The Lesser Cursus Project Title AG16 North Kite Enclosure and Lake Barrows AG17 Barrow West of Stonehenge AG18 Cursus Barrows (West) A303 AMESBURY AG19A Normanton Down Barrows (north) TO BERWICK DOWN AG19B Normanton Down Barrows (central) AG19C Normanton Down Barrows (south-western) AG19D Normanton Down Barrows (south-eastern) Drawing Title AG20 Durrington Down Barrows AG21 Stonehenge Barrows FIGURE 6.6 AG22 Stonehenge CULTURAL HERITAGE AG23 The Greater Cursus, Amesbury 56 and Winterbourne Stoke 30 Round Barrows, and the Amesbury 42 Long Barrow ASSET GROUPS AG24 Stonehenge Bottom / Luxenborough Barrows AG25 Packway Barrows AG26A King Barrows (Old King Barrows - north) Designed Drawn Checked Approved Date HS GM CC WB 03/09/18 AG26B King Barrows (New King Barrows - south) Internal Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge World Heritage Site
    Stonehenge World Heritage Site A Strategy for Interpretation, Learning and Participation 2010 –15 Cover: A reconstruction of the Southern Circle, Durrington Walls at North Newnton (Time Team, 2005) © Julian Thomas Stonehenge World Heritage Site A Strategy for Interpretation, Learning and Participation 2010 –15 Written and compiled by Emma Carver with assistance from Susan Greaney and contributions from all members of the WHS Interpretation and Learning team © Published in April 2011 by English Heritage On behalf of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site Committee English Heritage,1 Waterhouse Square, 138-142 Holborn, London EC1N 2ST Product code: 51695 (AGD82_04/11) CONTENTS 0.0 Executive summary 0.1 The purpose of this Strategy 0.2 Our objectives PART I 1.0 The Stonehenge WHS in context 1.1 Recent developments 1.1.1 A new management plan 1.1.2 New research within the WHS 1.1.3 The Stonehenge Environmental Improvements Project (SEIP) 1.1.4 Working with the collections 1.1.5 Co-ordinating Learning and Outreach 1.2 The purpose of the Strategy 1.3 How it works 1.3.1 Who owns the Stonehenge WHS? 1.3.2 The WHS Interpretation & Learning team 1.3.3 The status of the Strategy 1.4 The principles 1.5 Working definitions 1.5.1 Interpretation 1.5.2 Learning 1.5.3 Outreach 1.6 The area covered by the Strategy 2.0 The subject matter 2.1 Stonehenge and associated monuments 2.1.1 Stonehenge 2.1.2 Neolithic and Bronze Age funerary and ceremonial monuments 2.2 Hidden archaeology 2.3 The distant past 2.3.1 Hunter-gatherers 2.3.2 Landscape changes 2.4 The landscape
    [Show full text]