DOCSLIB.ORG

Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 the Vision for Stonehenge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 the Vision for Stonehenge Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 Sky Eyeaerialphotography 2004©EnglishHeritagePhotoLibraryK040312 Stonehenge and itssurroundings Cover Stonehenge isthefocusofacomplexprehistoricmonumentsandsites peoples wholeftusthisrichlegacy. can betterunderstandtheextraordinaryachievementsofprehistoric presented, interpretedandenhancedwherenecessary,sothatvisitors landscape morefully.Wewillalsoensurethatitsspecialqualitiesare setting forit,allowingpresentandfuturegenerationstoenjoyitthe its archaeologyandwillprovideamoretranquil,biodiverserural without parallel.Wewillcareforandsafeguardthisspecialarea prehistoric monumentsandsites,whichtogetherformalandscape Stonehenge, butforitsuniqueanddenseconcentrationofoutstanding The StonehengeWorldHeritageSiteisgloballyimportantnotjustfor The VisionforStonehenge Rachel Foster 2003 © English Heritage Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 Written and compiled by Christopher Young, Amanda Chadburn and Isabelle Bedu Published in January 2009 by English Heritage on behalf of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site Committee © English Heritage 2009 English Heritage, 1 Waterhouse Square, 138–142 Holborn, London EC1N 2ST ISBN: 978-1-84802-041-2 CONTENTS Page FOREWORD 6 PREFACE 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 8 PART 1: THE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STONEHENGE WORLD HERITAGE SITE 9 1.0 Function of the World Heritage Site Management Plan 11 1.1 The need for the Plan 11 1.2 The status of the Plan 12 1.3 The purpose of the Plan 12 1.4 The structure of the Plan 13 1.5 The process of developing the Plan 13 1.6 Data Sources 15 2.0 Assessment of the 2000 World Heritage Site Management Plan 15 2.1 Evaluation of the 2000 Management Plan 15 2.2 Public Inquiries and Government decisions affecting the 2000 Vision for the WHS 18 2.3 Changes in knowledge since 2000 19 2.4 The “core zone” of the 2000 Management Plan 20 3.0 Description and significance of the World Heritage Site 20 3.1 Location and boundary of the Stonehenge part of the WHS 20 Location 20 The Stonehenge WHS and its boundary 20 3.2 Description of the World Heritage Site 21 Brief description 21 The cultural heritage of the World Heritage Site 21 The character of the WHS and its regional context 23 3.3 Significance of the World Heritage Site 25 The Outstanding Universal Value of the WHS 25 Statement of Significance 25 Attributes of Outstanding Universal Value for the Stonehenge part of the WHS 28 Authenticity and Integrity 32 Other cultural heritage and historic environment values 34 Landscape and nature conservation values 34 Educational and research values 36 Social, artistic and spiritual values 36 Tourism and economic values 37 2 Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 Contents Page 4.0 Current policy context 37 4.1 Planning and policy framework 37 4.2 Relationship to other statutory and management plans 38 4.3 Historic environment designations 39 4.4 Landscape and nature conservation designations 40 4.5 Government position on road and visitor centre 40 5.0 Current management context 41 5.1 The Stonehenge WHS executive and consultative groups 41 5.2 The Stonehenge WHS team 41 5.3 Working groups and liaison with key partners 41 5.4 Funding arrangements for the WHS team 41 5.5 Relationship to the Avebury part of the WHS 42 5.6 Ownership and management roles 43 5.7 The role of English Heritage 43 5.8 The role of the National Trust 44 5.9 The local community 44 5.10 Agriculture 44 5.11 Agri-environmental schemes 45 5.12 The military 46 5.13 Woodland and forestry management 47 5.14 Royal Society for the Protection of Birds 47 5.15 Museums 47 5.16 The Geographic Information System database 47 PART 2: KEY MANAGEMENT ISSUES 49 6.0 Introduction to key issues 50 7.0 Planning and policy 52 7.1 UNESCO Policies and Guidance 52 7.2 Changes to the English planning system 54 7.3 Heritage Protection Reform 55 7.4 English Heritage’s Conservation Principles 57 7.5 Government statements affecting Stonehenge 57 7.6 The WHS boundary and buffer zone 57 7.7 Development control 59 8.0 Conservation 60 8.1 The condition of archaeological monuments and sites in the WHS 60 8.2 The settings of the WHS and its attributes of OUV 62 8.3 Monument management 64 8.4 Agricultural practices 65 8.5 Conservation of other parts of the historic environment 66 8.6 Nature conservation 66 8.7 Climate change 70 8.8 Risk management and counter-disaster preparedness 70 Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 3 Contents Page 9.0 Visitor, tourism and education issues 71 9.1 Sustainable tourism 71 9.2 Public access 74 9.3 Visitor management 75 9.4 Solstice management 77 9.5 Physical impacts on the Site 78 9.6 Existing visitor facilities 78 9.7 The need for improved visitor facilities 79 9.8 Interpretation, education and museums 79 10.0 Roads and traffic 81 10.1 Highways network and usage 81 10.2 Road safety 83 10.3 Public transport provision and sustainable access 83 10.4 Car parking facilities and usage 84 11.0 Research 85 11.1 The importance of research in the WHS 85 11.2 The archaeological research framework 85 11.3 Archaeological research priorities 85 11.4 Sustainable archaeological research 86 11.5 The archiving of archaeological finds, paper archives and data 87 11.6 Research links with Avebury and beyond 87 12.0 Maintaining the long-term objectives of the Management Plan 88 13.0 Management, liaison and monitoring arrangements for the World Heritage Site 88 13.1 Management and liaison within the WHS 88 13.2 Revision of WHS governance 90 13.3 Funding and Resources 90 13.4 Relationship to the Avebury WHS 91 13.5 Monitoring and reviewing the Plan 92 13.6 Monitoring indicators 92 PART 3: AIMS AND POLICIES 97 14.0 Vision, aims and policies 99 14.1 Vision 99 14.2 Statutory and Policy Framework 100 14.3 The designation and boundaries of the World Heritage Siten 101 14.4 Conservation of the World Heritage Site 102 14.5 Sustainable Tourism and Visitor Management 107 14.6 Sustainable Traffic Management and Transportation 111 14.7 Research 113 14.8 Long-term objectives for the World Heritage Site 114 14.9 Management, Liaison and Monitoring 114 4 Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 Contents Page PART 4: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN 117 15.0 Action Plan 118 BIBLIOGRAPHY 133 APPENDICES 137 A. Membership and terms of reference of the Stonehenge WHS Committee 139 B. Membership and terms of reference of the Stonehenge WHS Advisory Forum 141 C. The WHS Management Plan public consultation process 142 D. Statement of principles governing archaeological work in the Stonehenge WHS 145 E. The role of the WHS Coordinator 148 F. Reports and Decisions from the World Heritage Committee and Bureau referring to Stonehenge 149 G. Detailed archaeological description of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site 155 H. Stonehenge Regulations 1997 158 I. Key publications, surveys and education resources 160 J. MOD and MPBW Concordat on Future Building Work at Larkhill 164 K. ICOMOS International Cultural Tourism Charter 166 L. Bodies with an interest in the WHS 167 M. The English Heritage Stonehenge GIS 168 N. Article 4 Direction in relation to land around Stonehenge 169 O. Regional, sub-regional and local planning policies of relevance to Stonehenge 170 P. The “Vision for the Future” extract from the Stonehenge WHS Management Plan 2000 172 MAPS 173 1. The Stonehenge World Heritage Site 175 2. Archaeology and Land Use 176 3. Grass Restoration since 2000 177 4. Access 178 5. Land Ownership 179 6. Heritage Designations 180 7. Landscape and Nature Conservation Designations 181 8. Regional Landscape Context 182 9. Landscape Character 183 10. Visual Sensitivity 184 FACTS AND FIGURES 187 DEFINITIONS 188 ABBREVIATIONS 193 INDEX 194 ILLUSTRATIONS AND TABLES 1. The Aims which should be prioritised during the lifetime of the Plan according to the Consultation exercise 15 2. Location of the Stonehenge and Avebury WHS in the UK 20 3. Location of the Stonehenge and Avebury WHS in southern England 20 4. Number of collisions and casualties in the WHS between March 2005 and April 2008 83 5. Key monitoring indicators for the Stonehenge WHS 94 6. The Stonehenge WHS Action Plan 119 7. Larkhill Concordat map 165 Stonehenge World Heritage Site Management Plan 2009 5 Contents FOREWORD by Barbara Follet, Minister for Culture, Creative Industries and Tourism This new Management Plan is being introduced at a key point in the development of Stonehenge. It provides the strategic framework for environmental improvements, including the closure of the junction of the A303 and A344 and the re-location and upgrading of the current visitor facilities. It also provides the overall policy framework for the integrated management of the whole World Heritage Site and will guide those with a particular interest in its care. The Plan demonstrates the Government’s commitment to protect and enhance this unique and important Site.We are committed to its implementation and will continue to work closely with our many partners to achieve this goal.The I am pleased to present this revised Management Plan for the Government is determined to make the necessary road Stonehenge World Heritage Site. changes, improve the visitor facilities and interpretation by 2012 and strengthen the partnerships in place to help Management Plans are the frameworks in which our World manage the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. Heritage Sites work to ensure their continued sustainable use and the maintenance of their Outstanding Universal Value for I am extremely grateful to all those who have worked so generations to come.They are fundamental to meeting our hard in the last decade to bring about positive change at international obligations under the World Heritage Stonehenge, in particular English Heritage, the National Trust, Convention. the Highways Agency, Natural England, the RSPB, the Ministry of Defence,Wiltshire County Council, Salisbury District Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites is one of Britain’s Council, the World Heritage Site landowners and all the best known World Heritage Sites.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A303 Stonehenge E
    1 A303 Stonehenge e m Amesbury to Berwick Down u l o V Report on Public Consultation September 2017 A303 Stonehenge, Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive summary 2 Background context 2 Scheme proposals presented for consultation 2 Consultation arrangements 3 Consultation response 3 Key considerations 5 Effectiveness and benefits of consultation 6 1 Introduction 7 2 A303 Stonehenge: Amesbury to Berwick Down Scheme proposals 9 2.1 Scheme proposals 9 3 How we undertook consultation 11 3.1 When we consulted 11 3.2 Who we consulted 11 3.3 How consultation was carried out 15 4 Overview of consultation feedback 20 4.1 General 20 4.2 Breakdown of total responses 20 4.3 Questionnaire responses: Questions 1-4 21 4.4 Themes arising from comments made against Questions 1-7 23 4.5 Feedback data from Questions 8-10 24 5 Matters raised and Highways England response 27 5.1 General 27 5.2 Matters raised by the public with Highways England’s response 27 5.3 Responses by statutory bodies 107 5.4 Responses by non-statutory organisations and other groups 115 5.5 Matters raised by statutory bodies and non-statutory organisations and groups with Highways England’s response 153 5.6 Matters raised by landholders with Highways England’s response 170 6 Summary of Feedback and Key Considerations 190 6.1 Summary of consultation feedback 190 6.2 Key considerations 197 7 Conclusions 199 7.1 Purpose of the consultation 199 7.2 Summary of what was done 199 7.3 Did the consultation achieve its purpose? 201 Abbreviations List 203 Glossary 204 Appendices 207 Page 1 of 207 A303 Stonehenge, Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Executive summary Background context The A303 Stonehenge scheme is part of a programme of improvements along the A303 route aimed at improving connectivity between London and the South East and the South West.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge WHS Committee Minutes September 2015
    Stonehenge World Heritage Site Committee Meeting on Thursday 24 September 2015 at St Barbara’s Hall, Larkhill Minutes 1. Introductions and apologies Present: Roger Fisher (Chair/Amesbury TC), Colin Shell (ASAHRG), Philip Miles (CLA), Kate Davies (English Heritage), Phil McMahon (Historic England), Rachel Sandy (Highways England), Richard Crook (NFU/Amesbury TC), Jan Tomlin (National Trust), Nick Snashall (National Trust), Patrick Cashman (RSPB), Carole Slater (Shrewton PC), Clare King (Wiltshire Council), David Dawson (Wiltshire Museum), Ian West (Winterbourne Stoke PC) Apologies: Fred Westmoreland (Amesbury Community Area Board), John Mills (Durrington TC), Henry Owen John (Historic England), Stephanie Payne (Natural England), David Andrews (VisitWiltshire), Peter Bailey (Wilsford cum Lake/WHS landowners), Melanie Pomeroy‐Kellinger (Wiltshire Council), Ariane Crampton (Wiltshire Council), Andrew Shuttleworth (Winterbourne Stoke PC), Alistair Sommerlad (WHS Partnership Panel) 2.0 Agree minutes of last meeting & matters arising Version 3 of the minutes of the last meeting was approved. 3.0 Stonehenge and Avebury WHS Management Plan Endorsing the Plan The following organisations have endorsed the plan so far: Highways England, English Heritage, Amesbury PC, Wilsford cum Lake PC, Durrington TC, Wiltshire Museum, and Salisbury Museum. Other organisations: Natural England, RSPB, Historic England and National Trust are in the process of going through their organisation’s approval process. The WHS Coordination Unit (WHSCU) would be grateful for written endorsements by the end of 2015. The WHSCU are very happy to meet with any partner organisation to explain the Management Plan to their members. WHSCU Action Plan BT circulated a table which outlined how SS and BT will cover both local and thematic responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge Bibliography
    Bibliography Abbot, M. and Anderson-Whymark, H., 2012. Anon., 2011a, Discoveries provide evidence of Stonehenge Laser Scan: archaeological celestial procession at Stonehenge. On-line analysis report. English Heritage project source available at: 6457. English Heritage Research Report http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/latest/ Series no. 32-2012, available at: 2011/11/25Nov-Discoveries-provide- http://services.english- evidence-of-a-celestial-procession-at- herita ge.org.uk/Resea rch Repo rtsPdf s/032_ Stonehenge.aspx (accessed 2 April 2012). 2012WEB.pdf Anon., 2011b, Stonehenge’s sister? Current Alexander, C., 2009, If the stones could speak: Archaeology, 260, 6–7. Searching for the meaning of Stonehenge. Anon., 2011c, Home is where the heath is. National Geographic, 213.6 (June 2008), Late Neolithic house, Durrington Walls. 34–59. Current Archaeology, 256, 42–3. Allen, S., 2008, The quest for the earliest Anon., 2011d, Stonehenge rocks. Current published image of Stonehinge (sic). Archaeology, 254, 6–7. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural Anon., 2012a, Origin of some of the Bluestone History Magazine, 101, 257–9. debris at Stonehenge. British Archaeology, Anon., 2006, Excavation and Fieldwork in 123, 9. Wiltshire 2004. Wiltshire Archaeological Anon., 2012b, Stonehenge: sourcing the and Natural History Magazine, 99, 264–70. Bluestones. Current Archaeology, 263, 6– Anon., 2007a, Excavation and Fieldwork in 7. Wiltshire 2005. Wiltshire Archaeological Aronson, M., 2010, If stones could speak. and Natural History Magazine, 100, 232– Unlocking the secrets of Stonehenge. 39. Washington DC: National Geographic. Anon., 2007b, Before Stonehenge: village of Avebury Archaeological and Historical wild parties. Current Archaeology, 208, Research Group (AAHRG) 2001 17–21.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge and Avebury WHS Management Plan 2015 Summary
    Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site Vision The Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site is universally important for its unique and dense concentration of outstanding prehistoric monuments and sites which together form a landscape without parallel. We will work together to care for and safeguard this special area and provide a tranquil, rural and ecologically diverse setting for it and its archaeology. This will allow present and future generations to explore and enjoy the monuments and their landscape setting more fully. We will also ensure that the special qualities of the World Heritage Site are presented, interpreted and enhanced where appropriate, so that visitors, the local community and the whole world can better understand and value the extraordinary achievements © K020791 Historic England © K020791 Historic of the prehistoric people who left us this rich legacy. Avebury Stone Circle We will realise the cultural, scientific and educational potential of the World Heritage Site as well as its social and economic benefits for the community. © N060499 Historic England © N060499 Historic Stonehenge in summer 2 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan Summary 2015 1 World Heritage Sites © K930754 Historic England © K930754 Historic Arable farming in the WHS below the Ridgeway, Avebury The Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site is internationally important for its complexes of outstanding prehistoric monuments. Stonehenge is the most architecturally sophisticated prehistoric stone circle in the world, while Avebury is Stonehenge and Avebury were inscribed as a single World Heritage Site in 1986 for their outstanding prehistoric monuments the largest.
    [Show full text]
  • A303 PI Inspector's Report
    Report to the First Secretary of The Planning State and the Secretary of State for Inspectorate 4/09 Kite Wing Transport Temple Quay House 2 The Square Temple Quay By Michael Ellison MA (Oxon) Bristol BS1 6PN 0117 372 6372 An Inspector appointed by the First Secretary Date: 31 January of State and the Secretary of State for 2005 Transport Assisted by Clive Cochrane Dip Arch, Reg Arch, MSc, MRTPI HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) SLIP ROADS ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) (DETRUNKING) ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) SIDE ROADS ORDER 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD (STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER (NO. ) 200 THE A303 TRUNK ROAD STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT (COUNTESS ROUNDABOUT TO LONGBARROW CROSSROADS) (PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN CLASSES OF TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS) ORDER 200 AND THE A303 TRUNK ROAD STONEHENGE IMPROVEMENT (STONEHENGE BYWAY) (PROHIBITION OF MOTOR VEHICLES) ORDER 200 Dates of Inquiry: 17 February 2004 to 11 May 2004 Ref: HA61/4/3 REPORT TO THE FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT FILE REF: HA61/4/3 CONTENTS Section Subject Page Number Case Details 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Description of the site and its surroundings 7 3 Procedural Submission 12 4 The case of the Highways Agency 14 Background and history of the scheme 14 The need for the scheme 17 Traffic forecasts 20 The scheme proposals 21 Design standards 26
    [Show full text]
  • Stonehenge OCR Spec B: History Around Us
    OCR HISTORY AROUND US Site Proposal Form Example from English Heritage The Criteria The study of the selected site must focus on the relationship between the site, other historical sources and the aspects listed in a) to n) below. It is therefore essential that centres choose a site that allows learners to use its physical features, together with other historical sources as appropriate, to understand all of the following: a) The reasons for the location of the site within its surroundings b) When and why people first created the site c) The ways in which the site has changed over time d) How the site has been used throughout its history e) The diversity of activities and people associated with the site f) The reasons for changes to the site and to the way it was used g) Significant times in the site’s past: peak activity, major developments, turning points h) The significance of specific features in the physical remains at the site i) The importance of the whole site either locally or nationally, as appropriate j) The typicality of the site based on a comparison with other similar sites k) What the site reveals about everyday life, attitudes and values in particular periods of history l) How the physical remains may prompt questions about the past and how historians frame these as valid historical enquiries m) How the physical remains can inform artistic reconstructions and other interpretations of the site n) The challenges and benefits of studying the historic environment 1 Copyright © OCR 2018 Site name: STONEHENGE Created by: ENGLISH HERITAGE LEARNING TEAM Please provide an explanation of how your site meets each of the following points and include the most appropriate visual images of your site.
    [Show full text]
  • English Heritage Stonehenge Visitor Enhancement Project Planning
    English Heritage Stonehenge Visitor Enhancement Project Planning Submission for Permanent Coach Visitor Facilities & Visitor Transit System Improvements Heritage Impact Assessment April 2016 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Background 1 1.2 Consultations 4 2.0 METHODOLOGY 5 2.1 Aims and Scope 5 2.2 Planning and Policy Context 5 2.3 Impact Assessment Methodology 9 3.0 EXISTING BASELINE CONDITIONS 15 3.1 Introduction 15 3.2 Designated Heritage Assets 15 3.3 Historic Development of the Study Area 20 3.4 Monument Groups and Outstanding Universal Value 20 3.5 Sites and Monuments within the Assessment Area 24 4.0 ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS AND MITIGATION 29 4.1 Proposed Works 29 4.2 Mitigation Strategy 32 4.3 Construction Effects 35 4.4 Operational Effects 39 5.0 EFFECTS ON THE OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE OF THE WHS 44 5.1 Introduction 44 5.2 Stonehenge and the Stonehenge Avenue 44 5.3 The Cursus 45 5.4 The Cursus Barrows 46 5.5 The Lesser Cursus and Associated Barrows 46 5.6 The Monarch of the Plain 46 6.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 48 6.1 Effects on the Outstanding Universal Value of the WHS 48 6.2 Effects on Archaeological Remains 50 SVEP Permanent Coach Park April 2016 Heritage Impact Assessment 11110205_SVEP_HIA_V2_CMdw_15-04-16 Chris Blandford Associates REFERENCES 51 GLOSSARY 52 FIGURES 1 Designated Sites and Monuments in the Study and Assessment Areas 2 Scheduled Monuments and Recorded Sites in the Assessment Area 3 Scheme Elements Re-using Previously Developed Land / Reversible Scheme Elements APPENDICES 1 Heritage Impact Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Salisbury Plain SAC Conservation Objectives Supplementary Advice
    European Site Conservation Objectives: Supplementary Advice on Conserving and Restoring Site Features Salisbury Plain Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Site code: UK0012683 Date of Publication: 20 February 2017 Page 1 of 30 About this document This document provides Natural England’s supplementary advice about the European Site Conservation Objectives relating to Salisbury Plain SAC. This advice should therefore be read together with the SAC Conservation Objectives which are available here. You should use the Conservation Objectives, this Supplementary Advice and any case-specific advice given by Natural England, when developing, proposing or assessing an activity, plan or project that may affect this site. This Supplementary Advice to the Conservation Objectives presents attributes which are ecological characteristics of the designated species and habitats within a site. The listed attributes are considered to be those that best describe the site’s ecological integrity and which, if safeguarded, will enable achievement of the Conservation Objectives. Each attribute has a target which is either quantified or qualitative depending on the available evidence. The target identifies as far as possible the desired state to be achieved for the attribute. The tables provided below bring together the findings of the best available scientific evidence relating to the site’s qualifying features, which may be updated or supplemented in further publications from Natural England and other sources. The local evidence used in preparing this supplementary advice has been cited. The references to the national evidence used are available on request. Where evidence and references have not been indicated, Natural England has applied ecological knowledge and expert judgement.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilsford Cum Lake - Census 1911
    Wilsford cum Lake - Census 1911 Page Year Years Total No Children Address Surname Given Names Relationship Status Age Sex Occupation Industry or Service Employment Status Place of Birth Nationality if not British Infirmity Notes Number Born Married Children Living Died 1 Normanton Farm Crook Isaac Charles Head Unmarried 31 M 1880 Farmer Fyfield, Hampshire 1 Normanton Farm Crook Caroline Louise Sister Unmarried 38 F 1873 House Keeper Gomeldon, Wiltshire 1 Normanton Farm Merritt Flora Eliza Lucy Servant Unmarried 14 F 1897 General Domestic Servant Netton, Wiltshire 2 Normanton Ford Henry George Head Married 52 M 1859 29 Labourer on Farm Teffont Magna, Wiltshire 2 Normanton Ford Elizabeth Wife Married 48 F 1863 29 Stratford sub Castle, Wiltshire 2 Normanton Ford Charles Son 23 M 1888 Groom on Farm Stockton, Wiltshire 2 Normanton Ford George Son 8 M 1903 Winterbourne Stoke, Wiltshire 3 Normanton Cottage, Normanton Case Thomas Head Married 42 M 1869 18 Cowman on Fram Cann, Shaftesbury, Dorset 3 Normanton Cottage, Normanton Case Louisa Wife Married 46 F 1865 18 Charlton All Saints, Wiltshire 3 Normanton Cottage, Normanton Case Thomas Son 15 M 1896 Cowlad on Farm Netherhampton, Wiltshire 4 Reegers Cottage, Normanton Wilkins Walter Head Married 28 M 1883 4 River Reyer Woodford, Wiltshire 4 Reegers Cottage, Normanton Wilkins Mary Jane Wife Married 33 F 1878 4 Norbiton, Surrey 5 Normanton Arnold Edward Head Married 26 M 1885 2 Groom and Gardener on Farm Mere, Wiltshire 5 Normanton Arnold Louisa Wife Married 23 F 1888 2 Shroton, Dorset 5 Normanton
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Outline Assessment of the Impact of A303 Improvements On
    Preliminary Outline Assessment of the impact of A303 improvements on the Outstanding Universal Value of the Stonehenge Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage property Nicola Snashall BA MA PhD MIfA National Trust Christopher Young BA MA DPhil FSA Christopher Young Heritage Consultancy August 2014 ©English Heritage and The National Trust Preliminary Outline Impact Assessment of A303 improvements on the Outstanding Universal Value of the Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage property August 2014 Executive Summary The Government have asked the Highways Agency to prepare feasibility studies for the improvement of six strategic highways in the UK. One of these is the A303 including the single carriageway passing Stonehenge. This study has been commissioned by English Heritage and the National Trust to make an outline preliminary assessment of the potential impact of such road improvements on the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property. A full impact assessment, compliant with the ICOMOS guidance and with EU and UK regulations for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) would be a much larger task than this preliminary assessment. It would be prepared by the promoter of a road scheme and would require more supporting material and more detailed analysis of impacts. The present study is an outline preliminary assessment intended to inform the advice provided by the National Trust and English Heritage to the Highways Agency and the Department for Transport. It deals only with impact on Outstanding Universal Value and does not examine impacts on nationally or locally significant heritage. The objectives of the study can be summarised as: 1. Review changes in international and national policy and in our understanding of the Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage property to set the context for the assessment of impact of potential options for improvement of the A303; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites
    World Heritage 41 COM Patrimoine mondial Paris, 27 June / 27 juin 2017 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Forty-first session / Quarante-et-unième session Krakow, Poland / Cracovie, Pologne 2-12 July 2017 / 2-12 juillet 2017 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril MISSION REPORT / RAPPORT DE MISSION Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (373bis) Stonehenge, Avebury et sites associés (Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord) (373bis) 31 January – 3 February 2017 Report on the joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated sites 31 January – 3 February 2017 Table of contents Executive Summary 1. Introductory Statements 1.1 Acknowledgments 1.2. Aims and mandate of the February 2017 Mission 2. Context and background 2.1 Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) 2.2 Summary 1st Mission recommendations (October 2015 – report April 2016). 2.3 Reactions by the civil society 2.4 Governance and consensus building among heritage bodies 3. Responses by the SP to the recommendations of the first Mission - April 2016 3.1 Willingness to respond 3.2 Issues of archaeological organisation and quality control 3.3 Issue of visitor numbers and behaviour 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / Icomos Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites 27-30 October 20
    REPORT ON THE JOINT WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE / ICOMOS ADVISORY MISSION TO STONEHENGE, AVEBURY AND ASSOCIATED SITES Stonehenge October 2015 copyright UNESCO 27-30 OCTOBER 2015 Chris Barker, Civil Engineer, ICOMOS Nathan Schlanger, Archaeologist, ICOMOS Marie-Noël Tournoux, Project Officer Europe and North America Unit, World Heritage Centre Stonehenge October 2015 copyright UNESCO 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ……………………………………………………………….…… 4 1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………..… 5 2 MISSION REPORT ……………………………………………………………………….. 7 3 MISSION CONCLUSIONS ………………………………………………………………. 24 4 MISSION RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………………...…...... 24 5 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………... 28 6 ANNEXES…………....……………………………………………………………………... 29 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The joint World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS mission thanks the State Party for the arrangements for the Advisory Mission and the preparation of all the necessary relevant materials, together with the good will in its advancement. Particular thanks are due to DCMS and Historic England and more specifically to Keith Nichol and Hannah Jones from DCMS and Henry Owen-John and Phil McMahon from Historic England, our main focal points. The mission would like to acknowledge and to commend the investment and professionalism of our hosts in addition to logistics and hospitality. The assistance gladly provided by Historic England, English Heritage Trust, the National Trust, and their representatives, be it at organizational level or on the ground, including notably Chris Smith, Historic England, and Heather Sebire, Properties Curator West English Heritage Trust, Kate Davies, Stonehenge General Manager, English Heritage Trust, Beth Thomas & Sarah Simmonds, World Heritage site Coordinator, Nicola Snashall, National Trust WHS archaeologist for Stonehenge & Avebury, Cassandra Genn, Senior project and Stakeholder Manager, Ian Wilson, Assistant Director of Operations, Ingrid Samuel, Historic Environment Director, Janet Tomlin, National Trust, as well as the Wiltshire Council.
    [Show full text]