Inspire the Future
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Julio Frenk, MD, MPH, Phd Free and Open to the Public Who Will Speak on “Globalization and Health: Risks and Opportunities on Our Common Border”
THE UNIVERSI T Y OF ARIZON A ® ® The James E. Dalen, MD, MPH Distinguished Visiting Professor Lecture Series Inaugural Lecture Please join renowned health policy scholar and former Minister of Health of Mexico Wednesday May 7, 2008 4 pm – 5 pm Reception Following Drachman Hall Room B109 Julio Frenk, MD, MPH, PhD Free and Open to the Public who will speak on “Globalization and Health: Risks and Opportunities On Our Common Border” For more information Dr. Julio Frenk served as Minister of Health of Mexico from 2000 to 2006. His admini- please contact: stration was involved in an ambitious effort to provide universal health insurance. Dr. Donna Knight Frenk currently divides his time between Seattle and Mexico City. In Seattle, he serves (520) 626-6459 [email protected] as Senior Fellow at the Global Health Program of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and is also the Chairman of the Board of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington. In Mexico City, he is the President of the CARSO Health Institute, a new foundation focusing on health-systems innovations in Latin America. Sponsored by: Prior to joining the Mexican government, Dr. Frenk held positions as executive director of evidence and information policy at the World Health Organization (WHO), executive vice president of the Mexican Health Foundation, and founding director-general of Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health. Dr. Frenk obtained his medical degree from the National University of Mexico in 1979. He also holds a Ph.D. in medical care organization and sociology, a Master of Public Health degree, and a Master of Arts degree in sociology from the University of Michigan. -
VII. STANDING COMMITTEES A. Academic and Student Affairs
A–3 VII. STANDING COMMITTEES A. Academic and Student Affairs Committee Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Board Reappointments RECOMMENDED ACTION It is the recommendation of the University President and the Academic and Student Affairs Committee that the Board of Regents make the following reappointments to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) Board: Reappointments Lincoln Chen 7/1/11 to 6/30/13 Harvey Fineberg 7/1/11 to 6/30/13 Julio Frenk 7/1/11 to 6/30/14 Jane Halton 7/1/11 to 6/30/14 Peter Piot 6/1/10 to 6/30/13 Srinath Reddy 7/1/11 to 6/30/12 David Roux 7/1/11 to 6/30/14 Endang Rahayu Sedyaningsih 6/1/10 to 6/30/13 Tomris Turmen 7/1/11 to 6/30/13 BACKGROUND Article I, section 1.1 of the IHME Board Bylaws states “The Board shall consist of nine (9) members. The Board members shall be appointed by the Board of Regents from nominations submitted by the President. The Chair of the Board of Regents shall appoint the Chair of the Board. Four members shall be from key global health institutions but shall serve in their individual capacity, four members shall be eminent scientists or policy makers from around the world, and the Chair of the Board shall be a leading figure with a scientific background and substantial leadership experience with health policy programs. The term of office of each appointed Board member shall be three years. No appointed Board member may serve more than three successive three-year terms. -
For European Biotech? Continued from Page 1 Around the World, Including the French Academies of Science by the Fact That the Complainants Did Not Challenge Them
Competitive Enterprise Institute - Volume 19, Number 2 - March/April 2006 Neeww EEra,ra, oror ‘‘AncienAncien RRégime,’égime,’ fforor EEuropeanuropean BBiotech?iotech? by Gregory Conko he long-awaited World Trade all remain in effect argues in favor of Organization (WTO) decision intervention by the WTO. (Ironically, Ton biotech food is due to be the current WTO Director General is released this spring, but a leaked copy none other than Pascal Lamy.) of the report has already elicited The most important victory for the considerable buzz. Most United States and its partners is the analyses score it a resounding WTO’s judgment that the EU failed to victory for the United States abide by its own regulations by “unduly and its co-complainants, and a delaying” fi nal approval of otherwise stinging defeat for European state complete applications for 25 food biotech protectionism. When it came time for products. The culprit here is the European The reality is that the decision their WTO defense, Commission’s highly politicized, two-stage is only a partial and largely symbolic however, the Europeans approval process: Each application must victory. For not achieving a more complete actually denied that a moratorium had ever fi rst be cleared for marketing by various and meaningful success, the United States, existed. Fortunately, the WTO decision scientifi c panels, and then voted on by Canada, and Argentina, which jointly fi led acknowledges the EU’s illegal practices— elected politicians. the complaint, have their own excessively and the disingenuousness of the EU’s Signifi cantly, the WTO assumed that risk-averse policies to blame. -
The Use of Non-Human Primates in Research in Primates Non-Human of Use The
The use of non-human primates in research The use of non-human primates in research A working group report chaired by Sir David Weatherall FRS FMedSci Report sponsored by: Academy of Medical Sciences Medical Research Council The Royal Society Wellcome Trust 10 Carlton House Terrace 20 Park Crescent 6-9 Carlton House Terrace 215 Euston Road London, SW1Y 5AH London, W1B 1AL London, SW1Y 5AG London, NW1 2BE December 2006 December Tel: +44(0)20 7969 5288 Tel: +44(0)20 7636 5422 Tel: +44(0)20 7451 2590 Tel: +44(0)20 7611 8888 Fax: +44(0)20 7969 5298 Fax: +44(0)20 7436 6179 Fax: +44(0)20 7451 2692 Fax: +44(0)20 7611 8545 Email: E-mail: E-mail: E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Web: www.acmedsci.ac.uk Web: www.mrc.ac.uk Web: www.royalsoc.ac.uk Web: www.wellcome.ac.uk December 2006 The use of non-human primates in research A working group report chaired by Sir David Weatheall FRS FMedSci December 2006 Sponsors’ statement The use of non-human primates continues to be one the most contentious areas of biological and medical research. The publication of this independent report into the scientific basis for the past, current and future role of non-human primates in research is both a necessary and timely contribution to the debate. We emphasise that members of the working group have worked independently of the four sponsoring organisations. Our organisations did not provide input into the report’s content, conclusions or recommendations. -
Animal People News
European Commission votes to ban dog &cat fur B R U S S E L S ––The European Commis- sion on November 20 adopted a proposal to ban the import, export, and sale of cat and dog fur throughout the European Union. “The draft regulation will now be considered by the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers for adoption by the co- decision procedure,” explained the EC Asian dog. (Kim Bartlett) announcement. “There is evidence that cat and dog fur been found not just on clothing, but also on a is being placed on the European market, usually number of personal accessories, as well as chil- dren’s soft toys.” Asian rabbits. (Kim Bartlett) undeclared as such or disguised as synthetic and other types of fur,” the EC announcement sum- “Just the idea of young children playing marized. “The vast majority of the cat and dog with toys which have been made with dog and Olympics to showcase growing fur is believed to be imported from third coun- cat fur is really something we cannot accept,” tries, notably China.” European Consumer Protection Commissioner Fifteen of the 25 EU member nations Markos Kyprianou said. Chinese animal testing industry have already individually introduced legislation “Kyprianou stopped short of calling B E I J I N G ––The 2008 Olympic Glenn Rice, chief executive of Bridge against cat and dog fur. “The proposed regula- for every product containing fur to have a label Games in Beijing will showcase the fast- Pharmaceuticals Inc., is outsourcing the tion adopted today addresses EU citizens con- detailing its exact origin,” wrote London Times growing Chinese animal testing industry, work to China, where scientists are cheap cerns, and creates a harmonized approach,” the European correspondent David Charter, the official Xinhua news agency disclosed and plentiful and animal-rights activists are EC announcement stipulated. -
Health Policy and Systems Research Publications in Latin America Warrant the Launching of a New Specialised Regional Journal
González Block et al. Health Research Policy and Systems (2020) 18:59 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00565-1 RESEARCH Open Access Health policy and systems research publications in Latin America warrant the launching of a new specialised regional journal Miguel Angel González Block1*, Juan Arroyo Laguna2, Oscar Cetrángolo3, Pedro Crocco Ábalos4, Ramiro Guerrero5, Daniela Riva Knauth6, Abdul Ghaffar7, Patricia Pavón León8, María del Rocío Saénz9, Rosanna González McQuire10, Beatriz Martínez Zavala10 and Emilio Gutiérrez Calderón11 Abstract Background: Scientific journals play a critical role in research validation and dissemination and are increasingly vocal about the identification of research priorities and the targeting of research results to key audiences. No new journals specialising in health policy and systems research (HPSR) and focusing in the developing world or in a specific developing world region have been established since the early 1980s. This paper compares the growth of publications on HPSR across Latin America and the world and explores the potential, feasibility and challenges of innovative publication strategies. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was undertaken using HPSR MeSH terms with journals indexed in Medline. A survey was undertaken among 2500 authors publishing on HPSR in Latin America (LA) through an online survey, with a 13.1% response rate. Aggregate indicators were constructed and validated, and two-way ANOVA tests were performed on key variables. Results: HPSR publications on LA observed an average annual growth of 27.5% from the years 2000 to 2018, as against 11.4% worldwide and yet a lag on papers published per capita. A total of 48 journals with an Impact Factor publish HPSR on LA, of which 5 non-specialised journals are published in the region and are ranked in the bottom quintile of Impact Factor. -
EMERGING Technologies the Wise Use Of
2015 Annual Report THE WISE USE OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES The Hastings Center is an independent, Director of Communications and nonpartisan, and nonprofit bioethics research Development: Bill Jeffway institute founded in 1969. Hastings’ mission Writer: Susan Gilbert is to address fundamental ethical issues in Art Director: Nora Porter the areas of health, health care, life sciences Hastings Photography: Siofra Vizzi research, and the environment as they affect individuals, communities, and societies. ©2016 The Hastings Center To obtain a copy of The Hastings Center’s complete financial statement for 2015, please write to the Development Department, The Hastings Center, 21 Malcolm Gordon Road, Garrison, NY 10524. The Hastings Center 21 Malcolm Gordon Road Garrison, NY 10524 Tel 845-424-4040 Fax 845-424-4545 [email protected] www.thehastingscenter.org @hastingscenter facebook.com/hastingscenter 2015 HASTINGS CENTER ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 From the President 3 The Wise Use of Emerging Technologies l New Genetics Technologies l Artificial Intelligence l Big Data l Brain Science l Prenatal Testing 14 Significant Scholarship on Other Topics 18 Our Scholars and Projects at a Glance 19 Hastings Center Fellows Retreat 20 Donors 24 Statement of Financial Position inside back cover Hastings Center Board of Directors and Staff FROM THE PRESIDENT Shaping the future ~ wisely Dear Friends and Colleagues, We live in an age of transformative scientific powers, capable of changing the very nature of the human species and radically remaking the planet itself. These new powers hold great promise for enhancing health and well-being. However, no technology is neutral. As Stephen Hawking recently put it, “Our future is a race between the growing power of technology and the wisdom with which to use it.” The Hastings Center’s goal is to help forge that wisdom. -
GBD 20Th Anniversary Symposium All Activities Take Place in the Susan Brotman Auditorium, Unless Otherwise Noted
GBD 20th Anniversary Symposium All activities take place in the Susan Brotman Auditorium, unless otherwise noted #GBD20th Wifi Network: McCaw-Client; Password: Artistic Webcast: http://bit.ly/GBD20th; GBD Compare: vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26 7:45-9AM REGISTRATION Lobby 9-10AM History and Evolution: Main Themes of the GBD Historical perspective on where the GBD has progressed since its inception Presenter: Alan Lopez, University of Melbourne Moderator: Jeremy Smith, Author Discussants: • Trevor Mundel, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation • Emmanuela Gakidou, IHME, University of Washington • Richard Horton, The Lancet 10-11:15AM Epidemiological Transition and Progress Toward Improving Health Examining trends in the epidemiological transition and what they mean for accelerating progress toward better health Presenter: Theo Vos, IHME, University of Washington Moderator: Rafael Lozano, IHME, University of Washington Discussants: • Thomas Bollyky, Council on Foreign Relations • Isabella Maina, Kenya Ministry of Health • Yohannes Kinfu, University of Canberra 11:15-11:45AM BREAK Lobby 11:45AM-1PM Emerging Challenges as Seen Through the GBD Key drivers and indicators on risks and challenges for the future Presenter: Stephen Lim, IHME, University of Washington Moderator: George Mensah, US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Discussants: • Ritu Sadana, World Health Organization • Louisa Degenhardt, University of New South Wales • Stein Emil Vollset, Norwegian Institute of Public Health • Mohsen Naghavi, IHME, University -
Images to Diagnose Eye Diseases – a Step That Toll Free in USA 800-329-7000 Could Revolutionize Eye Care in Underserved Communities Around the World
® Bascom Palmer Eye Institute | University of Miami Health System UHEALTH VOLUME XXXVIII ISSUE 1 JANUARY 2020 AI Artificial Intelligence and Your Sight Global Expertise Bascom Palmer Ranked No. 1 in USA Again Bascom Palmer Eye Institute’s mission is to enhance the quality of life by improving sight, preventing blindness, and advancing ophthalmic knowledge through compassionate patient care and innovative vision research. FEATURE The Power of AI Artificial intelligence has the power to transform 2 2 RESEARCH AND EDUCATION BEST 10 Protecting Vision 11 OVERALL Global Impact 12 ( PROGRAM ) BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUTE BASCOM PALMER EXCELLENCE 1 University of Miami WILMER EYE INSTITUTEE 2 Johns Hopkins University Awards and Honors 16 WILLS EYE HOSPITAL 3 Thomas Jefferson University MASSACHUTES EYE AND EAR 4 Harvard University Welcome New Faculty 19 W.K. KELLOGG EYE CENTER 5 University of Michigan UNIVERSITY OF IOWA 20 6 Carver College of Medicine Events DUKE UNIVERSITY EYE CENTER 7 Duke University Hospital MORAN EYE CENTER Profiles in Philanthropy 24 8 University of Utah STEIN & DOHERTY EYE INSTITUTE 9 University of California, Los Angeles CASEY EYE INSTITUTE 10 University of Oregon 18 DEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE 11 University of Oklahoma STORM EYE INSTITUTE 12 Medicals University of South Carolina Bascom Palmer members of Iron Arrow (left to right): Drs. Chris Alabiad, Eduardo Alfonso, Richard Lee, Steven Gedde, Jean-Marie Parel, David Tse and Michael Gittelman. Not pictured are Drs. John Clarkson, Sanjoy Bhattacharya and alumnus Gordon Miller. 13 Dear Friends and Colleagues: Eduardo C. Alfonso, M.D. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute is a global leader in Kathleen and Stanley J. -
The Use of Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Research
SYMPOSIUM ARTICLE The Use of Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Research Dario L. Ringach, PhD Abstract: Opposition to the use of animals in biomedical research rests CLAIM: HUMANS DO NOT BENEFIT FROM on diverse scientific and ethical arguments. Here I offer a response to ANIMAL RESEARCH key objections and argue that the responsible use of animals in One extreme view holds that information gathered from biomedical research with the goal of advancing medical knowledge, animal research cannot, even in principle, be used to improve science and human health, is scientifically and morally justified. My human health. It is often accompanied by catchy slogans such views are unlikely to be shared uniformly across the scientific com- as “If society funds mouse models of cancer, we will find more cures for cancer in mice.”4 It is argued that the physiology of munity. Thus, I hope this personal perspective persuades other scien- animals and humans are too different to allow results from tists, public health officials, scientific organizations and our academic animal research to be extrapolated to humans.5 leadership to join the debate and invites opponents of animal research Such a blanket statement is falsified by numerous cases to create an atmosphere where civil discourse can take place, free of where experimentation on animals has demonstrably contrib- threats and intimidation. The public deserves an open and honest debate uted to medical breakthroughs. The experiments on cardiovas- on this important topic. cular and pulmonary function in animals that began with Key Indexing Terms: Animal research; Medical research; Animal Harvey and continued with the Oxford physiologists6 estab- rights; Ethics; Public policy. -
Lives in the Balance: Utilitarianism and Animal Research
Lives in the Balance: Utilitarianism and Animal Research ROBERT BASS University of North Carolina at Pembroke [This may differ in detail from the final published version in The Ethics of Animal Research: Exploring the Controversy , MIT Press 2012] In the long history of moral theory, non-human animals – hereafter, just animals – have often been neglected entirely or have been relegated to some secondary status.1 Since its emergence in the early nineteenth century, utilitarianism has made a difference by focusing upon happiness or well-being (and their contraries) rather than upon the beings who fare well or suffer. Inevitably, that has meant that human relations to and use of other animals have appeared in a different light. Some cases have seemed easy: once admit that the interests of animals matter and there can be little hesitation in condemning their cruel treatment. Among the more difficult cases has been the bearing of utilitarianism upon the use of animals in various kinds of research where, though the animals might suffer, there were believed to be prospects of great human benefit and where no cruel or malicious motives need be involved. What I shall provide in the current paper is an extended discussion of the bearing of utilitarianism upon practices of animal research. Since such practices have attracted both utilitarian criticism and defense, this will require the examination of arguments on both sides, including consideration of the human benefits, the animal costs, and the ways which one can be weighed against the other. I. UTILITARIANISM AND ANIMAL RESEARCH: THE HISTORICAL AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND The historical connection of utilitarianism to animal research is both complex and disputed. -
Beginnings1 the Late Dr. Jonathan Mann First Launched Health And
HHR Journal: A Brief History (2006-2010) Beginnings1 The late Dr. Jonathan Mann first launched Health and Human Rights: An International Journal, in 1994. In his essay introducing the first issue, Mann wrote, We have created this new journal, Health and Human Rights, to inform and expand the space within which ideas about the intersection between health and human rights can venture forth into the world, to be cited and criticized, debated and discussed, torn down and built up. For it is in the nature of pioneering work—in this case, exploring the frontiers of health and human rights—that some new paths will lead forward, and others will be found, later and from afar, to have been only byways and meandering trails.2 The new journal was to be a rigorous peer-review academic research publication, a flagship journal of the (then also) newly founded François-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights, a Harvard University center founded by the Countess Albina du Boisrouvray and located at Harvard School of Public Health in Boston. Figure 1 lists the initial advisory and editorial boards. Mann hoped that the Center might be able to publish four issues of the journal each year. Fig. 1. Masthead of Health and Human Rights: An International Journal Volume 1, Number 1 (1994) Senior Advisory Board Philip Alston (Australia) Halfdan Mahler (Denmark) V. Ramalingaswami (India) Henry Steiner (USA) Katarina Tomasevski (Croatia) Editorial Board Sunila Abeyesekera Timothy Harding Aryeh Neier Manuel Carballo Aart Hendriks Geneviève Pinet Lincoln Chen Hakima Himmich Peter Piot William Curran Emmanuel Hirsch Jacqueline Pitanguy Ernest Drucker Howard Hu Olikoye Ransome-Kuti Paul Epstein Hina Jilani Jon E.