DOCSLIB.ORG

Mattachine Society by Craig Kaczorowski

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mattachine Society by Craig Kaczorowski Mattachine Society by Craig Kaczorowski Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2004, glbtq, inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com One of the earliest American gay movement (or homophile) organizations, the Mattachine Society began in Los Angeles in the winter of 1950. It was formed by Harry Hay, a leading gay activist and former Communist Party member, along with seven other gay men. The name refers to the Société Mattachine, a French medieval masque group that allegedly traveled from village to village, using ballads and dramas to point out social injustice. The name was meant to symbolize the fact that "gays were a masked people, unknown and anonymous." By sharing their personal experiences as gay men and analyzing homosexuals in the context of an oppressed cultural minority, the Mattachine founders attempted to redefine the meaning of being gay in the United States. They devised a comprehensive program for cultural and political liberation. In 1951, the Mattachine Society adopted a Statement of Missions and Purpose. This Statement stands out in the history of the gay liberation movement because it identified and incorporated two important themes. First, Mattachine called for a grassroots movement of gay people to challenge anti-gay discrimination; and second, the organization recognized the importance of building a gay community. The Mattachine Society also began sponsoring discussion groups in 1951, providing lesbians and gay men an opportunity to share openly, often for the first time, their feelings and experiences. The meetings were frequently emotional and cathartic. Over the next few years attendance at Mattachine meetings increased tremendously. Soon discussion groups were meeting throughout the United States. Mattachine groups also began to sponsor social events, fundraisers, newsletters, and publications. From 1953 to 1968, a group within the Mattachine Society, ONE, Incorporated, produced the monthly periodical ONE Magazine, which at its peak achieved a circulation of 5,000 copies. Although formally independent of the society, its first editor, Dale Jennings, and most of its editorial board were members. In 1954, the Los Angeles postmaster seized and refused to mail copies of ONE on the grounds that the magazine was "obscene, lewd, lascivious and filthy." The seizure led to a lengthy court battle with significant consequences for the gay and lesbian movement, when in 1958 the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the mere discussion of homosexuality was not obscene. ONE continued publication until 1972. In 1955, the San Francisco branch of the Society began a more scholarly, less confrontational journal, Mattachine Review, which they published until 1965. These periodicals reached previously isolated individuals and helped the Mattachine Society become better known nationally. The Society also became active in protesting police entrapment of gay men and other oppressive tactics Page 1 and policies. Some of Mattachine's more political actions, as well as the Communist leanings of several of its founders, put the organization under considerable pressure and public scrutiny during the country's anti-Communist era of McCarthyism in the early 1950s. For example, a columnist for a local Los Angeles newspaper wrote about the Society in March 1953, calling it a "strange new pressure group" of "sexual deviants" and "security risks" who were banding together to wield "tremendous political power." The article set off a panic among Mattachine members. In the controversy that followed, two conventions were held. Unprecedented public meetings of gay people, these conventions were attended by delegates representing hundreds of discussion group participants. A strong coalition of conservative delegates emerged, questioning the organization's goals and challenging the idea that gay people were a legitimate minority group. They claimed such an approach would only encourage hostility. Although in disagreement with the conservative delegates, the Mattachine board members feared the consequences of a government investigation of society activities. Consequently, in May 1953, the original founders resigned, and the organization was turned over to the conservatives who began to restructure it. The new leadership drastically revised the goals of the organization. Instead of social change, they advocated accommodation; instead of mobilizing gay people, they sought the support of psychiatrists and psychiatric professionals, who they believed held the key to reform. Unfortunately, such changes had a devastating effect, and the society declined. Discussion group attendance fell and chapters folded. At its 1954 convention, only 42 members attended. The society dissolved its national structure in 1961. The New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco chapters remained active for several more years, but the society's influence waned. It should be noted that not every organization using the name Mattachine was formally affiliated with the original Mattachine Society or its national structure. For example, Chicago's Mattachine Midwest was established in 1965 as a completely independent organization. As the Mattachine Society declined, other organizations such as the San Francisco Society for Individual Rights, the Gay Liberation Front, and the Gay Activists Alliance became more dominant in the nascent gay liberation movement. Mattachine failed to adapt to the increased militancy of gay men and lesbians after the Stonewall Rebellion in 1969 and faded away. Bibliography D'Emilio, John. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983. Hay, Harry. Radically Gay: Gay Liberation in the Words of Its Founder. Will Roscoe, ed. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996. Timmons, Stuart. The Trouble with Harry Hay: Founder of the Modern Gay Movement. Los Angeles: Alyson Publications, 1990. About the Author Page 2 Craig Kaczorowski writes extensively on media, culture, and the arts. He holds an M.A. in English Language and Literature, with a focus on contemporary critical theory, from the University of Chicago. He comments on national media trends for two newspaper industry magazines. Page 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jun Jul. 1970, Vol. 14 No. 09-10
    Published bi-monthly by the Daughters of ONCE MORE WITH FEELING Bilitis, Inc., a non-profit corporation, at THE I have discovered my most unpleasant task as editor . having to remind y. 'i P.O. Box 5025, Washington Station, now and again of your duty as concerned reader. Not just reader, concern« ' reader. Reno, Nevada 89503. UDDER VOLUME 14 No. 9 and 10 If you aren’t — you ought to be. JUNE/JULY, 1970 Those of you who have been around three or more years of our fifteen years n a t io n a l OFFICERS, DAUGHTERS OF BILITIS, INC know the strides DOB has made and the effort we are making to improve this magazine. To continue growing as an organization we need more women, women . Rita Laporte aware they are women as well as Lesbians. If you have shy friends who might be President . jess K. Lane interested in DOB but who are, for real or imagined reasons, afraid to join us — i t h e l a d d e r , a copy of WHAT i w r ■ ’ '^hich shows why NO U N t at any time in any way is ever jeopardized by belonging to DOB or by t h e LADDER STAFF subscribing to THE LADDER. You can send this to your friend(s) and thus, almost surely bring more people to help in the battle. Gene Damon Editor ....................... Lyn Collins, Kim Stabinski, And for you new people, our new subscribers and members in newly formed and Production Assistants King Kelly, Ann Brady forming chapters, have you a talent we can use in THE LADDER? We need Bobin and Dana Jordan wnters always in all areas, fiction, non-fiction, biography, poetry.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2020 from Archival Silence to Screaming Queens: Reconstructing the Compton's Cafeteria Riot
    August 2020 From Archival Silence to Screaming Queens: Reconstructing the Compton’s Cafeteria Riot By Isaac Fellman & Susan Stryker On an August evening in 1966, three years before the Stonewall riots in New York City, the patrons of the Compton’s Cafeteria on Taylor and Turk Streets in San Francisco’s Tenderloin district fought back against police harassment. Little documentary evidence survives of this key moment in transgender history. The photograph above from the GLBT Historical Society’s archives is an extremely rare still of the interior of the Compton’s location in question, and the exact date the riot occurred has never been determined. Our archives contain much of the documentation that does survive, which enabled historian and former GLBT Historical Society executive director Susan Stryker to research the event in the early 2000s. Together with Victor Silverman, Stryker produced the Emmy Award-winning 2005 documentary Screaming Queens, which succeeded in bringing the riot to greater public awareness. Our special program on August 5 features a screening of Screaming Queens and a conversation with Stryker. Reference archivist Isaac Fellman, who has been working extensively with our transgender-related collections, interviewed Stryker about how she uncovered the legacy of Compton’s. The story of Compton’s exposes gaps in archives; it exists in memory, but official sources, records and contemporary news reporting are scarce. Did this scarcity influence your process and philosophy as a historian? The scarcity of traditional primary-document sources really did require me to embrace creative and nontraditional research methodologies. One of the most important strategies was simply walking in the neighborhood, studying San Francisco’s urban history, using the GLBT Historical Society’s sites database to map historic trans-serving bars and SROs, and reading a lot of spatial and architectural theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year 1969 Marked a Major Turning Point in the Politics of Sexuality
    The Gay Pride March, begun in 1970 as the In the fertile and tumultuous year that Christopher Street Liberation Day Parade to followed, groups such as the Gay commemorate the Stonewall Riots, became an Liberation Front (GLF), Gay Activists annual event, and LGBT Pride months are now celebrated around the world. The march, Alliance (GAA), and Radicalesbians Marsha P. Johnson handing out flyers in support of gay students at NYU, 1970. Photograph by Mattachine Society of New York. “Where Were Diana Davies. Diana Davies Papers. which demonstrates gays, You During the Christopher Street Riots,” The year 1969 marked 1969. Mattachine Society of New York Records. sent small groups of activists on road lesbians, and transgender people a major turning point trips to spread the word. Chapters sprang Gay Activists Alliance. “Lambda,” 1970. Gay Activists Alliance Records. Gay Liberation Front members marching as articulate constituencies, on Times Square, 1969. Photograph by up across the country, and members fought for civil rights in the politics of sexuality Mattachine Society of New York. Diana Davies. Diana Davies Papers. “Homosexuals Are Different,” 1960s. in their home communities. GAA became a major activist has become a living symbol of Mattachine Society of New York Records. in America. Same-sex relationships were discreetly force, and its SoHo community center, the Firehouse, the evolution of LGBT political tolerated in 19th-century America in the form of romantic Jim Owles. Draft of letter to Governor Nelson A. became a nexus for New York City gays and lesbians. Rockefeller, 1970. Gay Activists Alliance Records. friendships, but the 20th century brought increasing legal communities.
    [Show full text]
  • OUT of the PAST Teachers’Guide
    OUT OF THE PAST Teachers’Guide A publication of GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network Page 1 Out of the Past Teachers’ Guide Table of Contents Why LGBT History? 2 Goals and Objectives 3 Why Out of the Past? 3 Using Out of the Past 4 Historical Segments of Out of the Past: Michael Wigglesworth 7 Sarah Orne Jewett 10 Henry Gerber 12 Bayard Rustin 15 Barbara Gittings 18 Kelli Peterson 21 OTP Glossary 24 Bibliography 25 Out of the Past Honors and Awards 26 ©1999 GLSEN Page 2 Out of the Past Teachers’ Guide Why LGBT History? It is commonly thought that Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered (LGBT) history is only for LGBT people. This is a false assumption. In out current age of a continually expanding communication network, a given individual will inevitably e interacting with thousands of people, many of them of other nationalities, of other races, and many of them LGBT. Thus, it is crucial for all people to understand the past and possible contributions of all others. There is no room in our society for bigotry, for prejudiced views, or for the simple omission of any group from public knowledge. In acknowledging LGBT history, one teaches respect for all people, regardless of race, gender, nationality, or sexual orientation. By recognizing the accomplishments of LGBT people in our common history, we are also recognizing that LGBT history affects all of us. The people presented here are not amazing because they are LGBT, but because they accomplished great feats of intellect and action. These accomplishments are amplified when we consider the amount of energy these people were required to expend fighting for recognition in a society which refused to accept their contributions because of their sexuality, or fighting their own fear and self-condemnation, as in the case of Michael Wigglesworth and countless others.
    [Show full text]
  • ''One" Not Obscene Book Reviews Letters
    FEBRUARY 1958 50c HELEN P. BRANSON TELLS REASONS Whx Homosexuals Don’t Get Married (Page 8) ’’ONE" NOT OBSCENE SAYS U. S. SUPREME COURT (Page 4) BOOK REVIEWS LETTERS Casting a Spotlight on Human Sox Problom s — For THINKING ADULTS ■ nattachf ne O ffici Of THf S04*D Of DI«ECrO*S inattachine ^rittg, M.. Copyright1 295S by the Matlacbine Society, incorporated FOURTH YEAR OF PUBLICATION-UATTACHIHE REVIEW founded January 1955 Mauaebint Foundation establisbid 1950; M<tttacbine*Society, Inc., ebartered 2954 OBSCENITY NEEDS TO BE DEFINED Volume IV FEBRUARY 1958 Number 2 The declaration by the U. S. Supreme Court that ONE magazine is not obscene (see page 4) is a victory for freedom of expression everywhere in the U. S., and not a gain for the 'homosexual press' Comtemt» alone. ARTICLES Changing times, changing attitudes and the general progress of human civilization call for old standards to be examined critically VICTORY FOR ONE by John Logan.........................................4 from time to time. The vague old bogey of obscenity is one of HOMOSEXUALS AS I SEE THEM by Helen P. Branson.. 8 these and within the past year or so sponsors of censorship on ob­ ENIGMA UNDER SCRUTING by Sexology Research Staff..14 scenity grounds have been called to task mote than once, but the right of Federal and State governments to judge and ban obscene SHORT FEATURES material has been upheld, as we believe it should be (see MATTA’ COURT RELEASES KINSEY MATERIAL..................................5 CHINE REVIEW. July 1957). We believe that ONE and MATTACHINE agree that freedom to CUSTOMS’ SEVEN-YEAR ITCH IS SCRATCHED............6 publish educational information, in an interesting and readable SOCIETY FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF SEX..........7 form, on the subject of sex variation is a genuine service in the ARMY REVIEWS RISK DISCHARGES.......................................14 interest of truth, justice and human well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading.Homosexuality in America
    RECOMMENDEDREADING A BRIEF HISTORY OF HOMOSEXUALITY IN AMERICA Despite the fact that humans have never limited their sexual pleasure to what we now call heterosexual intercourse, the history of homosexuality is relatively short. The genital anatomy of one's partners-or what Freud calls one's "object choice"-did not become the definitive criterion for distinguishing homosexual and heterosexual selves until the last third of the nineteenth century. During the 1860's and 70's European public administrators began noticing that some people were organizing their lives not around family, household, and reproduction but around various forms of sexual pleasure. This was probably a recent phenomenon made possible by the forces of capitalism, which tended to draw people off the land into cities away from their parishes and families and to reduce the importance of arranged marriage. Alarmed, officials began studying these populations, whom they characterized as sexual deviants and grouped according to the particular practices they engaged in. One such class of deviant came to be called "homosexuals”. Homosexuals quickly became the target of medical, psychiatric, and legal intervention, and as early as the 1870, they came together in such places as Bavaria to fight criminalization of sodomy. Until the Nazis destroyed Magnus Hirschfeld's homosexual archives in Berlin and hundreds of thousands of homosexual people were sent to die in concentration camps, the homosexual movement in Germany was widespread and influential. In the U.S., the history of homosexual culture and politics is even shorter than it is in Europe. The largest and best-known communities are in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, and there are reasons for that.
    [Show full text]
  • Frigide Barjot; Homophile Malgré Tout?1
    JACK D. Frigide Barjot; KIELY homophile malgré tout?1 Jack D. Kiely University College London Abstract Frigide Barjot is the dethroned leader of the Manif pour tous movement that saw hundreds of thousands take to the street to protest against the gay marriage and adoption bill in France from late 2012 onwards. Despite what many claimed to be the self-evident homophobia of the movement, through the denial of equal rights to all, Barjot ferociously maintained and proclaimed her homophilic proclivities, and instead shrouded her arguments against gay marriage and adoption in notions of protection of natural ‘filiation’, the rights of the child and ultimately the promotion of the heterosexual (one man/one woman) family unit above all others. It is through this overt heterosexism, however, that one could perfectly well oppose gay marriage and remain a homophile, or in the least attempt to divest oneself of the charge of homophobia. This paper explores the extent to which this homophilic/homophobic split was maintained by Barjot through the analysis of three of her published works, before, during and after the Manifs pour tous, and the extent to which this split was borne out by other members of the movement, and places this within shifting notions of French republicanism. Keywords: Barjot, Frigide, gay, marriage, homophobia Virginie Tellenne née Merle, ‘stage name’ Frigide Barjot (literally translated as ‘Frigid Bonkers’), is the television star, devout catholic and erstwhile leader of the ‘Manif pour tous’ [‘The Demo for all’] – principal opponent to the proposed ‘Mariage pour tous’ [‘Marriage for all’]2 law of the Hollande government in France – an opposition that saw hundreds of thousands take to the streets to protest against gay marriage and adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating a Contemporay Radical Faerie Manifestation Through
    THESIS NAVIGATING CONCIOUSNESS TOWARD LIBERATION: INVESTIGATING A CONTEMPORAY RADICAL FAERIE MANIFESTATION THROUGH A DECOLONIAL LENS Submitted by Kyle Andrew Pape Department of Ethnic Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2013 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Karina Cespedes Co-Advisor: Roe Bubar Irene Vernon Kathleen Sherman Copyright by Kyle Andrew Pape 2013 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT NAVIGATING CONCIOUSNESS TOWARD LIBERATION: INVESTIGATING A CONTEMPORAY RADICAL FAERIE MANIFESTATION THROUGH A DECOLONIAL LENS This thesis argues for the necessity of decolonial consciousness within queer thought and activism. The historical acts of cultural appropriation enacted by the LGBTQ subculture radical faeries of indigenous peoples are intended for healing. However by investigating contemporary radical faerie culture in Thailand, it is found that colonial culture fundamentally defeats queer liberatory movements from within. Primary data was collected through cyber-ethnographic methods and consists of a photo archive and several online blogs and associated websites. Analyzes emerged through Visual Grounded Theory methodology. This study provides evidence of globalizing colonial discourse and the resulting ineptitude of radical faerie activism. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS During my eight years at Colorado State University I have become intimately involved with the Department of Ethnic Studies and its faculty. It is commonly reiterated among these scholars that “it takes a community” by which we mean nothing can be achieved without each other. To begin I thank Roe Bubar and Karina Cespedes for working with me so closely while providing me room to grow. I thank you both for the commitment you have shown to me and this work, as it surely has been a process of its own.
    [Show full text]
  • ONE Magazine and Its Readers
    1 ONE Magazine and Its Readers he publication of ONE magazine’s first issue in January 1953 was a Twatershed moment in the history of American sexuality. Though not the first American publication to cater to homosexual readers (male phy- sique magazines had been coyly cultivating gay male readers for years), ONE was the first American publication openly and brazenly to declare itself a “homosexual magazine.” Many of its early readers doubted the magazine would last long. A reader, Ned, explained to ONE in a 1961 letter, “When the fifties were young I bought my first copies of ONE at a bookstore a few blocks from my studio on Telegraph Hill in San Francis- co. As I remember, those first copies were not very professional looking; and perhaps the contents were not impressive. But the mere fact that a bit of a magazine dared present the subject in writing by those who were [homosexual] was impressive. If anyone had predicted, however, that the mag. would live into the sixties, I’d have expressed doubts. One did look doubtful in those days.”1 ONE’s survival also seemed unlikely given the widespread antigay sentiment circulating throughout American society in the 1950s. Was ONE even legal? Could it be considered obscene for merely discussing homosexuality in affirmative tones? No one was sure in 1953. Yet ONE survived until 1967, by which time the country’s political, social, and cultural mood had shifted so dramatically that ONE seemed quaint and old-fashioned compared to the dozens of other gay publica- tions populating newsstands and bookstores.
    [Show full text]
  • January 27, 1961: the Birth of Gaylegal Equality Arguments
    \\Server03\productn\N\NYS\58-1\NYS111.txt unknown Seq: 1 12-FEB-02 15:54 JANUARY 27, 1961: THE BIRTH OF GAYLEGAL EQUALITY ARGUMENTS WILLIAM N. ESKRIDGE, JR.* In 1956, it was not exactly illegal to be a ªhomosexualº in the United States, but it was a felony to make love to anyone of the same sex, and mere suspicion of homosexuality could cost a citizen her livelihood. Dr. Franklin Kameny, a Harvard-educated (Ph.D.) astronomer, was arrested in August of that year for allegedly solicit- ing sex from an undercover police officer. Because the charges were expunged after a probationary period, Kameny's application for a position with the Army Map Service identified the incident as one in which the plea was ªnot guiltyº and the charge was ªdis- missed.º1 This description of the incident was technically correct under state law, but when the Army learned of the underlying charge, it concluded that Kameny had not been sufficiently forth- coming. The Army dismissed him, and the Civil Service Commis- sion (ªCSCº) barred him from federal employment for several years. The employment bar also automatically prevented Kameny from obtaining security clearances needed for virtually any private sector job in his field. That Kameny lost his job over a minor incident suggesting his homosexuality was nothing new in the period after World War II. Nor was the irony of his situation particularly unusual: dismissals from federal or state government service were just as likely to be based upon the failure of a government employee to be completely * John A.
    [Show full text]
  • Is "Outing"—Publicly Announcing Anotherperson's Homosexuality — a Political Tool, Cultural Honesty Or Blackmail
    -Hrs-fc i^eB-son IN A MORE courteous era, famous homosexuals were • comfortably separated from modem times by centu¬ ries, if not millennia, that lent all mentions of sexual Naming Names Is "outing"—publicly announcing another person's homosexuality — a political tool, a quest for diversity an air of the foreign and historical. There was Plato and Alexander the Great, Michelangelo cultural honesty or blackmail: and Leonardo da Vinci. The associations of homosexuality with times and per¬ Few national sonages so remote seemed to serve everyone's purposes. joumals paid much heed when Mainstream society found reassurance in acknowledging outing quietly began a few years back. AIDS activists across the nation that homosexuality existed, that it had always existed, struck on while never having to own up to the fact that it endured outing as a political tactic when not only in Periclean Athens but in today's Cleveland they grew angry over the AIDS policies of a handful of and Chicago. Cays, meanwhile, got to be identified public officials who they knew to be with some of the most illustrious monikers in the history secretly gay. A senior United States senator from the West was outed by AIDS of art and philosophy. Outing first Over the past two decades, gay liberationists groused emerged as a organizers after a series of votes that, activ¬ ists that the true contributions lesbians and gay men were major public said, was inimical to the interests of making in every endeavor of American life were ob- issue tvith the fighting the epidemic. AIDS organizers scured by the lack of modem, out-of-the-closet role death ofMalcolm soon materialized at the senator's public models, but politesse prevailed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Glimpse at the History of the U.S. LGBTQ Community Part 1 by Valerie
    A glimpse at the history of the U.S. LGBTQ community Part 1 by Valerie Etienne-Leveille LGBTQ is an acronym for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer or questioning (1). The acronym meaning is simple, yet it provides a glimpse to the varied and complex representative groups united in strength and solidarity toward a common cause which is equal rights for all individuals (2). The early LGBTQ Rights Movement Henry Gerber, a German immigrant, founded the first documented gay rights organization in the United States in 1924 (3)(4). The organization founded in Chicago was named The Society for Human Rights. Gerber’s organization published the earliest documented gay-interest newsletter called “Friendship and Freedom” (3)(5). Due to fear of continued harassment and persecution experienced by many individuals, subscription rates to the Friendship and Freedom newsletter were low. Henry Gerber and the members of his organization were not immune to the social and political hostilities occurring during this time. In 1925, Gerber’s organization disbanded because of unwarranted police raids, arrests, and negative media coverage. Nevertheless, Henry Gerber continued to advocate for gay rights through his writings and networking with the community (5). The Henry Gerber House A National Historic Landmark in Chicago, IL. Photo by Thshriver (5). Activists: Harry Hay (1912-2002) and William Dale Jennings (1917-2000) Harry Hay was an actor, Communist labor organizer, musicologist, theoretician, and political activist (6). He participated in the San Francisco General Strike of 1934 in which the City of San Francisco was shut down when 65,000 workers from all industries walked off from their jobs to demand for more union control toward improved working conditions (7).
    [Show full text]