Railway Security

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Railway Security Railway Security This book provides an overview and assessment of the security risks, both man- made and natural, facing the railways and rail networks. Railroads face significant threats from disasters, but with situational awareness and coordinated effort these can often be substantially minimized. Transportation assets have always been vulnerable to natural disasters, but in the current environ- ment these assets are also a preferred target of human-caused disruption, espe- cially in the form of terrorism, as the events in many other parts of the world have underscored. Railways are not a homogeneous mode of transportation given their various roles in intercity and commuter passenger movement, as well as being a major portion of the freight ton-miles upon which the U.S. economy is highly dependent. Designed to provide advice for railway owners and first responders, this text discusses how to secure hazardous material transport and how to estab- lish guidelines for rail freight operations and rail passenger operations. The book aims to develop an understanding of the unique operating characteristics of rail- ways, the nature and the range of vulnerabilities, the present means for protecting the infrastructure, and the required public policy initiatives that are prerequisite for developing a comprehensive appreciation of the magnitude of this issue. The book utilizes case studies of transport disasters to illustrate lessons learned and to provide critical insight into preventative measures. This book will be of great interest to students and practitioners of transporta- tion, technology and engineering, and security management. Richard R. Young is Professor of Supply Chain Management at the School of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, USA, and a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport. Gary A. Gordon (Lt. Col., USA, Ret.) is Adjunct Faculty at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA, and former Assistant Federal Security Director for DHS/TSA, Railroad Specialist for the former ICC, and Assistant Chief Engineer of a Northeast railroad. Jeremy F. Plant is Professor Emeritus of Public Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, USA. Railway Security Protecting Against Manmade and Natural Disasters Richard R. Young, Gary A. Gordon, and Jeremy F. Plant First published 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2018 Richard R. Young, Gary A. Gordon, and Jeremy F. Plant The right of Richard R. Young, Gary A. Gordon, and Jeremy F. Plant to be identified as authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Young, Richard R., 1946– author. | Gordon, Gary A., author. | Plant, Jeremy F., 1945– author. Title: Railway security : protecting against manmade and natural disasters / Richard R. Young, Gary A. Gordon, and Jeremy F. Plant. Description: Abington, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2017. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017006850 | ISBN 9781420080643 (hardback : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781315155296 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Railroad accidents—Prevention. | Railroads—Security measures. | Terrorism—Prevention. | Emergency management. Classification: LCC HE1779 .Y66 2017 | DDC 363.12/2—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017006850 ISBN: 978-1-4200-8064-3 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-15529-6 (ebk) Typeset in Times New Roman by Apex CoVantage, LLC We gratefully dedicate this book to our wives – Mary, Bobbie, and Susan – for the patience that they had for us during the long period of research and writing that went into this vol- ume. They left us to the solitude of our respective studies and endured overhearing many long conference calls. We could not have done it without their encouragement and support. Contents List of figures ix List of tables x Foreword James M. Loy xi Preface xiii Abbreviations xv Glossary xxi 1 Introduction to railroad security 1 2 U.S. railroad systems overview 21 3 Securing the infrastructure 37 4 Railroad policing efforts 58 5 Securing rail freight operations I: Securing the logistics chain (including intermodal) 74 The nature of private railcar fleets in North America 89 Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism and the rail link in the chain of custody 91 6 Securing rail freight operations II: Hazardous materials 95 7 Securing rail freight operations III: Hazmat and the specific case of crude oil and ethanol 109 Oil spill in Oregon 118 8 Commuter passenger rail 122 Passenger rail attacks in India 136 viii Contents 9 Intercity passenger rail 139 10 Emergency or incident response, operations, and security 154 11 Protecting rail infrastructure: Where do we go from here? 174 Index 185 Figures 5.1 SCOR Model applied to railroad freight markets 75 5.2 SCOR Model with flows illustrated 76 5.3 Vulnerabilities and threats 87 6.1 Ten major chemical-producing U.S. states 96 7.1 Annual rail carloads of crude and ethanol (thousands) 113 7.2 Orders for new tank cars (thousands) 113 8.1 Major commuter rail lines 124 8.2 Disaster responses 127 9.1 U.S. intercity passenger rail routes 145 10.1 Typical NOAA/NWS five-day track 155 10.2 FEMA preparedness cycle 160 Tables 2.1 Classes of U.S. railroads 22 2.2 Major U.S. passenger rail operations 22 2.3 Ton-miles (mio) of freight by rail for 2015 24 2.4 Growth in intermodal volume since deregulation 25 2.5 Average daily commuter ridership in 2010 26 4.1 Railroad development and policing 59 4.2 Railroad policing initiatives 64 4.3 Principal challenges facing railroad police 65 4.4 Recent attacks on railroad infrastructure 67 4.5 Protection priorities of freight and passenger railroad police 71 5.1 Significant U.S. intermodal routes (millions of annual net tons), 2011 80 5.2 Principal types of railroad freight cars and their loadings 81 5.3 Major CONUS containerport traffic 2014 83 5.4 Participating entities in an international intermodal move 92 6.1 Major private railcar fleets in North America 99 6.2 Class I chemical carloadings and tonnage originated 99 6.3 Class I commodities by tonnage and revenue 100 7.1 RCRMS risk factor assessment summary 115 7.2 Categories of rerouting factors 115 8.1 Most-significant attacks on commuter rail 123 8.2 Genesis of commuter rail operations post-Staggers 129 8.3 Preparedness goal mission areas 135 11.1 Objectives and asset type 177 Foreword In our days together standing up the new Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Secretary Tom Ridge and I spoke often about our concern that understand- able attention to commercial aviation security could be crowding out attention deserved by the other modes of transportation, including railways. The years fol- lowing 9/11/01 held significant events in those other modes. Spain was attacked in Madrid in 2004. The target? Commuter rail. The United Kingdom was attacked in London in 2005. The target? The underground transit system. India was attacked in Mumbai in 2008. The mode of attack? From the sea. Other tragedies without a terrorism nexus abound. Deepwater Horizon, Hurricane Katrina, and Super- Storm Sandy come to mind here at home with sadly so many others around the globe. One of the few common elements to all these events is the impact each had on the multi-modal transportation system. whether or not that system was the focused target. The harsh reality in our ever-smaller globe is that any significant negative impact on even one mode can have ramifications locally, nationally, and even internationally. Think about simple things. that shirt you just bought at Walmart that was manufactured in China enjoyed an ocean voyage to the Port of Los Angeles, a train ride to a distribution warehouse, a truck ride to the retail store, and a ride in your car to its new home in your closet. In this new post-9/11 world we are still trying to understand, and during these days when change is a constant and the acceleration of the pace of that change demands ever-growing attention, security seems to have become the new dimension of everything. From the elements of our personal lives in this New Normal world to the massively complex challenges at the national security level, virtually every place we go, events we attend, choices of travel we make, and so many other daily decision elements are being refitted for their security realities. This excellent book focuses on one of those elements. security on railways. I wish I had been able to read it as part of our thinking in 2002 as we stood up DHS. In the same manner we have come to understand the linkages and overlaps among the multiple modes of trans- portation, we should recognize and learn from the multiple dimensions of any one of those modes. Just read the table of contents here to take an initial inventory of railway issues with security requirements. infrastructure, policing, protec- tion, hazardous materials transport, emergency response, and on and on. The three authors recognize what I have come to believe is the most important word in xii Foreword the post-9/11 security vocabulary.
Recommended publications
  • BSRA 2014-06-07 Entertainment Report
    BSRA Entertainment Report for June 7, 2014 LONG FORM (for historical record) Entertainment Report for June 7, 2014 June 7, 2014. Key System & Sacramento Northern. Clark Frazier presented a visual tour of the electric suburban Key System Transbay lines from San Francisco (connecting to the surviving Municipal Railway streetcar lines) to Oakland and Berkeley from 1956 to 1958, and then the freight-only electrified Sacramento Northern during the same time period. Most of these slides were from a Winterail show in California in 2002, but we got to see additional slides after the Winterail slides.. We started with a map of the Key System, which was a privately owned company formed from consolidating several streetcar systems and a realty company (Realty Syndicate of Francis "Borax" Smith and Frank C. Havens, which built and ran such properties as the Claremont Hotel which survives today as Claremont Resort), and then taken over by National City Lines in 1948. Before seeing the Key System itself, we saw some photos of the Bridge Terminal area, including Bridge Terminal itself (eventually named Transbay Terminal, and finally closed in 2010 for replacement with a new facility), which was the San Francisco terminal of the Key System and for a short period also the Southern Pacific (by way of its subsidiary East Bay Electric) and the Sacramento Northern, and then some modern photos of some of the San Francisco Municipal Railway's heritage streetcars running on the Market Street (Muni F) line, followed by some views of Muni streetcar service from the time period we would see covered for the Key System: 1956 to 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit Us at IAPSNJ Quarterly Magazine October ~ December 2017 Fall Edition
    IAPSNJ Quarterly Magazine October ~ December 2017 Fall Edition Volume 1, Issue 36 A social, fraternal organization of more than 4,000 Italian American Law Enforcement officers in the State. William Schievella, President Editor: Patrick Minutillo Executive Secretary Visit us at http://www.iapsnj.org IAPSNJ Quarterly Magazine October ~ December 2017 Fall Edition Page 2 Volume 1, Issue 36 P RESIDENT’ S MESSAGE B ILL S CHIEVELLA topher Columbus and to of NYC are united to make erode the importance of the our voices heard. Our organi- Columbus Day Holiday. Over zation has joined with the the past few years, there has Italian Americans in the been a movement to elimi- NYPD, FDNY and others to nate the Columbus Day Holi- hold our elected officials that day in favor for “Indigenous allow this accountable. Persons Day”. While I do not object to the holiday, cele- I ask you to make this Co- brating the heritage of other lumbus Day the most cele- Americans, I am disgusted brated ever! Don your uni- that it is at the expense of form proudly and join us on Italian Americans. As you marching up 5th Avenue in know, Italian Americans Manhattan to show our Italian As you receive this maga- make up almost 25% of New American law enforcement zine, we will be ready to Cele- Jersey’s population. It is time pride. I urge you to bring brate Italian Heritage On Co- for our community to truly your family and make our lumbus Day. This holiday is unite and fight this attack up- voices heard through cele- full of history and Italian- on our heritage and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries
    BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries Class I Railroad Annual Report To the Surface Transportation Board For the Year Ending December 31, 2017 ACAA-R1 BNSF Railway Company 2650 Lou Menk Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76131 ANNUAL REPORT OF BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 Name, official title, telephone number, and office address of officer in charge of correspondence with the Board regarding this report. (Name) Jon I. Stevens (Title) Vice President & Controller (Telephone number) (817) 352-4975 (Area (Area Code) code) (Telephone (Telephone Number) number) (Office address) 2650 Lou Menk Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76131 (Street and number, City, State, and ZIP code) NOTICE 1. This report is required for every class I railroad operating within the United States. Three copies of this Annual Report should be completed. Two of the copies must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration, 395 E Street, S.W. Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20423, by March 31 of the year following that for which the report is made. One copy should be retained by the carrier. 2. Every inquiry must be definitely answered. Where the word "none" truly and completely states the fact, it should be given as the answer. If any inquiry is inapplicable, the words "not applicable" should be used. 3. Wherever the space provided in the schedules in insufficient to permit a full and complete statement of the requested information, inserts should be prepared and appropriately identified by the number of the schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Industry Modal Profile an Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities
    Railroad Industry Modal Profile An Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities October 2011 Version: Release_v3.0 DOT/FRA/ORD-11/20 The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views, positions, or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Government. Reference to any specific programs does not constitute official Federal Government endorsement or approval of the programs, the views they express, or the services they offer. TABLE of CONTENTS 1. Overview of the Railroad Industry ....................................................................................... 7 2. Current Railroad Workforce ................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Total Estimated Railroad Workforce ............................................................................11 2.1.1 Class I Freight Railroad Companies .....................................................................12 2.1.2 Class I Passenger Railroad: Amtrak ...................................................................13 2.1.3 Regional and Short Line Railroad Companies......................................................14 2.1.4 Manufacturers and Suppliers ...............................................................................14 2.1.5 Union Representation ..........................................................................................14 2.1.6 Major Associations ...............................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • George E. Tillitson Collection on Railroads M0165
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf1j49n53k No online items Guide to the George E. Tillitson Collection on Railroads M0165 Department of Special Collections and University Archives 1999 ; revised 2019 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the George E. Tillitson M0165 1 Collection on Railroads M0165 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: George E. Tillitson collection on railroads creator: Tillitson, George E. Identifier/Call Number: M0165 Physical Description: 50.5 Linear Feet(9 cartons and 99 manuscript storage boxes) Date (inclusive): 1880-1959 Abstract: Notes on the history of railroads in the United States and Canada. Conditions Governing Access The collection is open for research. Note that material is stored off-site and must be requested at least 36 hours in advance of intended use. Provenance Gift of George E. Tillitson, 1955. Special Notes One very useful feature of the material is further described in the two attached pages. This is the carefully annotated study of a good many of the important large railroads of the United States complete within their own files, these to be found within the official state of incorporation. Here will be included page references to the frequently huge number of small short-line roads that usually wound up by being “taken in” to the larger and expending Class II and I roads. Some of these files, such as the New York Central or the Pennsylvania Railroad are very big themselves. Michigan, Wisconsin, Oregon, and Washington are large because the many lumber railroads have been extensively studied out.
    [Show full text]
  • Whpr19750902-010
    Digitized from Box 15 of the White House Press- Releases at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 2, 1975 Office of the White House Press Secretary ------------------------~----------------------------- --------- THE WHITE HOUSE EXECUTIVE ORDER CREATING AN EMERGENCY BOARD TO INVESTIGATE A DISPUTE BETWEEN THE CARRIERS Rl::":PRESENTED BY THE NATIONAL RAILWAY LABOR COi~FERENCE AND CERTAIN OF THEIR EMPLOYEES A dispute exists between the carriers represented by the National Railway Labor Conference, designated in lists attached hereto and made a part hereof, and certain of their employees represented by the Railway Employes' Department, AFL-CIO; International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers; Brotherhood Railway Carmen of United States and Canada; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers, This dispute has not heretofore been adjusted under the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and This dispute,) in the judgment of the National Ivlediation Board, threatens substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive a section of the country of essential transportation service: NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 10 of the Railway Labor Act, as amended (45 U.S.C. 160), I hereby create a board of three members, to be appointed by me, to investigate this dispute. No member of the board shall be pecuniarily or otherwise / interested in any organization of railroad employees or any carrier. The board shall report its finding to the President with respect to the dispute within 30 days from the date of this Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Rulemaking: 2004-11-18 Appendixb Harborcraft and Locomotive
    APPENDIX B CALIFORNIA'S RAILROADS WITH INTRASTATE LOCOMOTIVES Lists of California's Class I, Passenger Train, and Class III Railroads With Intrastate Locomotives CALIFORNIA'S RAILROADS WITH INTRASTATE LOCOMOTIVES CALIFORNIA'S CLASS I FREIGHT RAILROADS : · Union Pacific Railroad (UP) · Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) CALIFORNIA'S INTRASTATE PASSENGER TRAIN OPERATIONS: COMPANY NAME ROUTE NAME OPERATION LOCATION(S) Southern California Regional Rail Authority Metrolink Los Angeles Area San Mateo County Transit District CalTrain Gilroy-San Jose-San Francisco Amtrak Pacific Surfliner Oceanside-Los Angeles-Oxnard CalTrans-Amtrak San Joaquin Bakersfield-Martinez or Sacramento CalTrans-Amtrak Capitol Corridor Auburn-Sacramento-San Jose North County Transit District Coaster San Diego-Oceanside San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Altamont Commuter Express Stockton-San Jose CLASS III RAILROADS: INTRASTATE SHORT HAUL OPERATIONS COMPANY NAME OPERATION LOCATION(S) IN CALIFORNIA Almanor Railroad Chester-Clear Creek Junction California Northern Railroad Napa-Woodland-Tehama and Tracy-Los Banos McCloud Railway McCloud Napa Valley Railroad Napa-St. Helena Santa Cruz Big Trees Santa Cruz-Roaring Camp San Diego and Imperial Valley Railroad San Diego-San Ysidro Santa Maria Valley Railroad Santa Maria-Guadalupe Northern Sierra Railway Oakdale-Standard, West Sac to Clarksburg/Woodland, McClellan Park, and Ft. Bragg-Willits, California San Joaquin Valley Railroad Fresno-Bakersfield Sierra Pacific Industries Quincy-Susanville Trona Railway Trona-Searles Ventura County Railroad Oxnard-Port Hueneme Yreka Western Railroad Yreka-Montague CLASS III RAILROADS: SWITCHER-TERMINAL OPERATIONS COMPANY NAME OPERATION LOCATION(S) IN CALIFORNIA Central California Traction Stockton-Lodi Los Angeles Junction Railway Company Los Angeles Modesto and Empire Traction Modesto Oakland Terminal Railway Oakland Pacific Harbor Lines Los Angeles-Long Beach Harbors Parr Terminal-Richmond Pacific Railroad Richmond Stockton Terminal & Eastern Railroad Stockton-Lodi.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Infrastructure, Services and Trends
    Appendix D Infrastructure, Services and Trends Alameda County Goods Movement Plan Task 2c: Infrastructure, Services, and Trends final memorandum prepared for Alameda County Transportation Commission prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March 2014 www.camsys.com final memorandum Alameda County Goods Movement Plan Task 2c: Infrastructure, Services, and Trends prepared for Alameda County Transportation Commission prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 555 12th Street, Suite 1600 Oakland, CA 94607 date September, 2014 Alameda County Goods Movement Plan Task 2c: Infrastructure, Services, and Trends Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Demographic and Freight-Flow Trends ......................................................... 2-1 2.1 Overview of Bay Area and Alameda County Population, Demographics, Economy, and Land Development Patterns ............... 2-3 2.2 Goods Movement and the Economy...................................................... 2-10 2.3 Freight-Flow Patterns and Trends .......................................................... 2-17 3.0 The Multimodal Goods Movement System ................................................ 3-26 3.1 Truck Highway System ........................................................................... 3-29 3.2 Freight Rail System ................................................................................... 3-41 3.3 Deepwater Seaport and Waterway System..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gerald R. Ford Administration White House Press Releases
    Digitized from Box 15 of the White House Press Releases at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 2. 1975 Office of the White House Press S~cretary ----~-------------------~-------------------------------------- THE WHITE HOUSE EXECUTIVE ORDER " -------" CREATING AN EMERGENCY BOARD TO INVESTIGATE A DISPUTE BETWEEN THE CARRIERS REPRESENTED BY THE NATIONAL RAILWAY LABOR COi-lFERENCE AND CERTAIN OF THEIR EMPLOYEES A dispute exists between the carriers represented by the National Railway Labor Conference, designated in lists attached hereto and made a part" hereof, and certain of their employees represented by the Railway Employes' " Department, AFL-CIO; International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers; Brotherhood Railway Carmen of United States and Canada; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers; This dispute has not heretofore been adjusted under the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and This dispute, in the j udgm~nt of the National I~ediation Board, threatens substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive a section of the country of essential transportation service: NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 10 of the Railway Labor Act, as amended (45 U.S.C. 160), I hereby create a board of three members, to be appointed by me, to investigate this dispute. No member of the board shall be pecuniarily or otherwise interested in any organization of railroad employees or any carrier. <The board shall report its finding to the President with respect to the dispute within 30 days from the date of this Order.
    [Show full text]
  • BNSF Railway Company Class I Railroad Annual Report
    BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries Class I Railroad Annual Report To the Surface Transportation Board For the Year Ending December 31, 2018 ACAA-R1 BNSF Railway Company 2650 Lou Menk Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76131 ANNUAL REPORT OF BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 Name, official title, telephone number, and office address of officer in charge of correspondence with the Board regarding this report. (Name) Paul Bischler (Title) Vice President & Controller (Telephone number) (817) 352-2600 (Area(Area code)Code) (Telephone (Telephone Number) number) (Office address) 2650 Lou Menk Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76131 (Street and number, City, State, and ZIP code) NOTICE 1. This report is required for every class I railroad operating within the United States. Three copies of this Annual Report should be completed. Two of the copies must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration, 395 E Street, S.W. Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20423, by March 31 of the year following that for which the report is made. One copy should be retained by the carrier. 2. Every inquiry must be definitely answered. Where the word "none" truly and completely states the fact, it should be given as the answer. If any inquiry is inapplicable, the words "not applicable" should be used. 3. Wherever the space provided in the schedules in insufficient to permit a full and complete statement of the requested information, inserts should be prepared and appropriately identified by the number of the schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • AIM Art 3 Determinations on Claims Revised Feb 13, 2017 Page 1 of 4
    AIM 3 301 Provisions of the Regulation See Part 320 of the Railroad Retirement Board's Regulations. 302 Determinations by Adjudicating Office The Railroad Retirement Board's regulations provide that each claim for benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act will be adjudicated and an initial determination with respect to the claim made by an adjudicating office. "Adjudicating office" is defined as any subordinate unit of the Railroad Retirement Board that may be authorized to make initial determinations and reconsideration decisions. Offices that have been authorized to make initial determinations and are therefore adjudicating offices include district offices, the Bureau of Field Service (BFS) and the Sickness and Unemployment Benefits Section (SUBS) in Operations. The extent to which these offices may make determinations is stated in various articles of the AIM and is summarized below. 303 Authority to Make Determinations 303.01 Office of Programs – Policy and Systems (P&S) Policy and Systems (P&S) in the Office of Programs formulates and publishes adjudication policy in the form of adjudication instructions and opinions. Each adjudicating office making determinations on claims under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act is to be guided by the adjudication instructions contained in the Adjudication Instruction Manual (AIM) and the opinions of P&S. Although P&S is authorized to make determinations on all issues, the Director of Policy and Systems will normally make initial determinations only on the following issues: 1. Whether a strike or work stoppage against a railroad employer is a “legal” strike, and 2. Whether a plan submitted by an employer or company qualifies as a nongovernmental plan for employment or sickness.
    [Show full text]