NATO DECLASSIFIED-PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IMSM-04S2-Q2 DECLASSIFIE-MISE EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE t a N o NATO NATO DEGRADED NA DEGRADED may be necessitated as a result result a as necessitated be may MEMORANDUM FOR THE THE FOR MEMORANDUM with this subject on the International Planning Staff will be will Staff Planning International the on subject this with wi II-XVIII. Slices in projects of Commanders NATO Major the by eeecs a_. for b and references Common \Infrastrueture NATO for programmes wish to raise. The draft report wil report draft The raise. to wish n uprig ouethsbe peae, hswl e issued be will this prepared, been has document supporting a and in relation to relocation projects or any future actions which actions future any or programmes these projects of relocation to execution relation priority\of in the with deal presenting not of does procedure considerations Vsual the detailed with more their accordance in with is deal and not does and necessity omte t ban h apoa o teNrhAlni Counci Atlantic North the of approval the obtain to Committee Agenda for consideration by the Committee\(approximately 9 Feb Feb 9 Committee\(approximately the by may consideration for officers staff Agenda your which points any discuss to available draft report to reach the International Planning Staff by not by Staff Planning International the reach to report draft hs nul rgams t programmes annual these to the group of projects lïpntained in the SACEUR and SACLANT and SACEUR the in lïpntained projects of group the to ITIUIN Al DISTRIBUTION: I December 23 than later 1 ENCLOSURE: 1 there and consideration, for Committee Military the of members to NATO MCWM-5 ) E H M ê Â L M Â S i G *r. Auth O 23 .(Draft) 32/35 MO l ea eido oewe uigwih h panr concerned planners the which during week one of period a be l

~Jà SUBJECT: The 19^7 NATO Co NATO 19^7 The SUBJECT: 2. This report is basted on the principles of military of principles basted the is on report This 2. References :References SHAPE a. . tahdi C3(rf) en rpr y h Military the by report a being MC/35(Draft) is Attached 1. . ti rqetd htyu il umt omns n the on comments you\ submit that will requested is It 3. o o ” iy lMSM-Q462-Q2-jrity - 6o' (Approved for Public Disclosure) Public for (Approved T UNCLASSIFIED O COMITE MILITAIRE DE L'ATLANTIQUE NO L'ATLANTIQUE DE MILITAIRE COMITE NORTH ATLANTIC MILITARY COMMITTEE MILITARY ATLANTIC NORTH -6 O H HIMN MILITARY\COMMITTEE: CHAIRMAN, THE FOR . SA b. D Fl-12 Gl-2 Gl-2 ‘ Fl-12 D APPROVED FOR PUBLIC D PUBLIC FOR APPROVED A DDDAUCn CAD Dl IDI I/"* Hier*! A C A I/"* Hier*! IDI Dl CAD ADDDAUCn M . \ EMBE C LANT Ser: 115O2/l8th/N-l48O, 13 Oct Oct 13 115O2/l8th/N-l48O, Ser: LANT R 966 OF S o h WrhAlni Cucl It Council. the 'Worth Atlantic 6 IOO.I 1 We a When . hs ouet consists document This - T EMLTR COMMITTEE MILITARY HE 8 èt m /I m the review now being undertaken being now review the \ 8 o if üo * \ Ditféütot* Mä'jfö'tf' 'FERNST Army German 'General, I Ifatutr Programme Infrastructure n l , 26 Oct Oct 26 , SCLOSURE T BY S M U D A M E D A R G N W O D cmet aebe considered been have comments l l hnb pae n the on placed be then l IDE E RBI ( (Slice XVIII) (Slice S€c. of 66

1967 14 November November 14 )£ki )£ki -5tf 9 MGWM^O-bb

R pages. Sie VI) ■ XVIII) (Slice D

COPY NO. COPY -71

66

001

1966

l

■o£$p..

66

).

K £ (\ ♦ K M ® ( U M l M M li o APPROVED FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE NATO RESTRICTED

NATO

MC 32/Vi

A REPORT BY THE MILITARY COMM ITTEE

TO THE

NORTH ATLANTIC COUNCIL

THE I967 NATO COMMON INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMME (SLICE XVIII)

References: a. SHAPE 6lOO.l8/l8, 26 Oct 66 b. SACLANT Ser: 115O2/l8th/N-l48O, 13 Oct 66 c_. C-R:(66)6, 18 Feb 66 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1. This report examines the programmes proposed by 3 SACEUR and SACLANT in references su and b. for NATO Common 4 Infrastructure for 1967 (Slice XVIII), In accordance with the 5 usual procedure of presenting these annual programmes to the 6 North Atlantic Council to justify their military necessity and

7 eligibility for NATO common infrastructure funding. 8 2. This report does not deal with the priority for 9 execution of these programmes in relation to relocation projects,

10 or any future actions which may be necessitated as the result of il the review now being undertaken by the Major NATO Commanders of

12 projects in Slices II-XVIII,to help offset the loss of French

13 contributions to infrastructure for Slices XVIII-XX and help meet l4 some of the costs of relocation.

15 3. The recommendations of the Military Committee are l6 primarily concerned with the military necessity and common interest

17 of these programmes, since political, financial and technical

LÖ aspects are the responsibility of the North Atlantic Council,

19 its committees and the International Staff. 20 4. Detailed examination and adjustment of projects,

21 particularly costings and technical details, are carried out as

22 a continuing process by the Infrastructure Committee with

NATO - 2 — MC 32/ 35"

A DDPnwcrn cpid □ 1 1□1 I r* m e n n c i i DC DECLASSIFIED-PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IMSM-0462-02 DECLASSIFIE-MISE EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE 10 12 29 27 25 ■54 22 14 13 11 30 28 23 15 31 9 6 8 D 7 after deducting Slice XVIII as now recommended and taking into taking and recommended now as XVIII afterSlice deducting AO - NATO A AIM and S and represe CURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDIN INFRASTRUCTURE CURRENT d I and-common necessity ofmilitary principle the approval Council AO - NATO DEDUCT 10$ Contingency Reserve Contingency 10$ DEDUCT participation, infrastructure from withdrawal theFrench account ( XVI-XX Slices ADD Savings on remaining proj remaining on Savings ADD MC 32/35 MC r s follows:- asare of ceiling a for agreement sharing cost DEDUCT Five additional WHQ projects WHQ additional Five DEDUCT DEDUCT French Contribution French DEDUCT approved Ceiling ut e al with other more detailed considerations. detailed more other with al LESS LESS JTrenchin projects of share h The above does not take into account any relocation any account into take not does above The costs which may be charged to NATO common infrastructure common toNATO charged be may which costs orities. A LN rgamsfr16 (lc VI)bsdo the on (Slicebased XVIII) 1967 for programmes CLANT . hs eoti, hrfr, desi therefore,is, report This 5. 6 n Slice XVII Slice XVI Slice XVII) and (Slices XVI inFrance authorised already prance AVAILABLE FOR SLICES XIX AND XX AND XIX SLICES FOR AVAILABLE refer By . Proposed Slice.XVIII Proposed (Slices XVI and XVII)and (Slices XVI (Slices XVII or XVlIl)(C-M(66)75) (Slices XVII tatives of the Major NATO Commanders and Natio and Commanders NATO Major the of tatives K l PK1©[LÄS©D[FD l HE K 1965

S e lices XVI-XX lices nce c_. the North Atlantic Council approved a c_.nce approved Council Atlantic North the - 1969 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PUBLIC FOR APPROVED ï E B O T A N g opo rjcs otie n h SACEUR theIn contained projects of roup ) - . The funds remaining for Slices XIX a XIX Slices for remaining )-.funds The

- 3 - 3- G

e cts

£228 g ned to recommend for recommend to ned million for million n ter e Em. not does stand 45.7 35.1 30.0 30.0 .6 n

al

228.0 2O4.1 102.9 183.7 198.6 m 29.4 Bm. 80.8 51.5 20.4 98.0 46.5 ai 4.9 5.5

n

n d XX,

D m ® APPROVEDTOlf PWUCS®R®9prçÇ^nm • ^ T E D

NATO

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 7. The two programmes have been coordinated with the nations

2 concerned and with the staffs of the two Major NATO Commanders,

3 8 . The programmes represent NATO minimum military

e requirements and all projects are considered to have a sufficient

5 degree of common use or interest to warrant eligibility for 6 common funding.

7 9. Existing facilities have been taken into consideration 8 with a view to achieving maximum economy. Cost estimates have

Q been coordinated with nations concerned to the maximum extent

10 practicable. The costs shown are, however, estimates subject to 11 revision to meet technical and military requirements. 12 10. These programmes do not include any relocation projects 13 consequent on the French initiative, which may subsequently be 14 agreed, for NATO common inf rastructure.-funding.

15 11. The tables at Enclosures 1 and 2 show the detailed 16 breakdown of the SHAPE and SACLANT programmes by categories and

17 by country. These programmes are discussed in greater detail in 18 paragraphs 12 - l6 below.

19 SACEUR1s PROGRAMME 20 12. SACEUR's recommended programme of £45.814 million 21 comprises projects in the following categories:- 22 a. Airfields: (£8.O37m.). Projects in this category

£3 consist mainly of restoration and improvements which are

24 necessary in order to meet the requirements of approved NATO

65 criteria and standards. The largest single expenditure 26 proposed, however, is for the construction of a maritime 27 helicopter airfield in Germany (£0.625m ) . EO.O'7Om. is also 28 included for completed U.S. prefinanced projects in France

29 in order that the U.S. may be reimbursed. Approval of 30 these projects is recommended.

NATO - 4 - MC 32/3 5“

v r /s T? rs T3 ^ < 3 m - p T r ,rT’ 7?T*

m m m © n & I? ÛPPROVPn FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE [ M û ® M§y\§f>l[M][l!) APPROVED FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

•SATO

nato - m ä t m

Ü* Naval Bases: (£l„o84m.). Two major projects in 2 Italy account for nearly 80$ of the funds proposed in this 3 category. These are the restoration of an external breakwater 4 and the construction of fuel storage facilities. All of the 5 proposed works are NATO military requirements and approval 6 is recommended. 7 c_. POL: (e8 .057m. ). More than half of the funds q proposed are for the completion of forward defence projects 9 in Germany which had previously been funded to 4O?6 of their 10 estimated cost in Slice XVII. Construction progress on 11 these projects justifies the funding of the remaining 6O$ 12 in this programme. Also justified, Is the proposal for 13 planning funds {£O/25Om, ) for the forward extension of the 14 CEPS in Germany. Projects for procurement of equipment for

15 repair of wartime damage amount to a total of El„923m. 16 All projects in this category are recommended for approval. 17 d. Communications : (£6.982m.) . Of the amount 18 proposed in this category, E5.7OOm, is for Tapeless Rotorless 19 On-Line (TROL) cryptographic equipment needed to meet SO essential operational requirements in ACE. Two other 21 important projects are the replacement of the obsolete 22 Northern radio relay system:-in Turkey, which is unreliable 23 and unsuitable for automatic data (digital) transmission,

24 and transportable emergency back-up equipment for the ACE 25 forward scatter. Approval of all projects is recommended. 26 e. Navigational Aids: (BO.22m.). Minor .'projects 27 in this category are recommended for approval. 28 f\ Warning Installations: (El»175m). All projects

29 are NATO military requirements and approval is recommended.

NATO - MC 32/35 - 5 -

n -R.ESTBJCTED î s î A T w

»SIMM APPROVED FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE DECLASSIFIED-PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IMSM-0462-02 DECLASSIFIE-MISE EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE 29 33 21 20 19 16 15 28 13* SACLANT's recommended programme of £0.720 million £0.720 of programme recommended SACLANT's 13* SACLANT» PROGRAMME a 28 F Mobile 27 On 26 24 23 31 30 4 rjcsaencsayt emtte elyeto PERSHING of deployment the 18 permit to necessary are projects 27 sites. 14 12 22 5 qimn o .. reinforcin U.S. for equipment 25 13 0 rpsdae seta HW ai ea installations, relay radio HAWK essential are proposed 11 10 32 9 8 7 6 5 £ WrHaqatr: (£ Headquarters: War £. 1 2 proposed ar proposed 3 2 sub 4 . trg eos (312.. hs s e category new a is This (£3.122m.). Depots: Storage k. AOmltr eurmns n prvli recommended. is approval and requirements military NATO consist 14. Maritime Air Facilities; (£0.030m.). One project One (£0.030m.). Facilities; P Air in at Maritime airfield damage flood Espinho 14.repair to works minor for included is only Communications. in seven and Facilities of one lÿpe A SAS site in Germany and one in Greece is recommended. Greece in one and Germany in site SAS A lÿpe one of recommended. is approval and urgent is requirement The concept. operational established the by required Quick a in units missile . SeilAmnto trg: £.5m. Approval (£0.350m). Storage: j..Ammunition Special NIK which includes two projects for equipment stora equipment for projects two includes which prvl f hs categ this of Approval the:tôtal amount Slice this in them It include to Should necessary become Slice, that for approved been yet as not have _ Srae oSraeMsie: (£ Missiles: Surface i_. to Surface for WHQ in ACE. It must be not be Itmust ACE. in WHQ for SATO - SATO AO :,i - NATO w m s of. eight projects., one in the category of Maritime Air Maritime of category the of. in projects., one eight e is necessary to store equipment In Norway for the ACE the for Norway In equipment store to necessary is E m radar equip radar itted for Slice XVII as serials 131 131 » Aj serials as XVII Slice for itted h Srae oArMsie: £.lm). Projects (£0.6l6m.).. Missiles: Air to . Surface o A f SACEUR’s programme would be increased by £4.903m. by increased be would programme SACEUR’s f o pproval is recommended, is pproval rce and the other is to store prepositioned store to is other the and rce APPROVED FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PUBLIC FOR APPROVED APPWwADT>CfuREBÏR!CTED e o Mobi for o m rtugal. ent*and minor improvements for some NIKE some for improvements minor ent*and le o WQadwl cmlt te programmin the complete will and WHQ yI recommended. Is ry R eaction Alert (QRA) posture as posture (QRA) Alert eaction 6 g .420 divisions for ACE, Both are Both ACE, for divisions e . hwvr ta ie proj five that d., however, m . l te projects the All . ). l l i [FII1I5 9 99.) 'These.949m. ). B, B, g C, facilities. e 1 , 1 * 3 3

-and133B e cts g mmAPPROVED FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE H A TO RESTRICTED

NATO ~ ■aniMF 1 15. Commun!cations: (SO.ëgOm. )« There are three major 2 projects:- 3 a_. Maritime Emergency Communications in the 4 ACLANT/ACCHAN areas (£0.24-3®.)

5 b. ACLANT Director Finding control facilities (£O.l43m.) 6 c_. Tropospheric Scatter link: between Portugal and

7 Gibraltar (£0.200m). An alternative solution may become 6 possible which would reduce the cost by EO.lOOm.

9 Some of the communications in a, above and part of a minor project 10 for reserve aerial masts are in France and are included subject 11 to confirmation by France that these facilities will continue to 12 be available to SACLANT for use in peace and war. 13 16. All of the projects proposed by-SACLANT are NATO 14 military reauirements and approval of the programme is recommended.

15 CONCLUSIONS l6 17. The Military Committee concludes that:- 17 a. The SACEUR and SACLANT programmes are militarily 18 justified. 19 ib. A sufficient degree of common usage and NATO 20 Interest has been established for the projects 21 recommended in these programmes. 22 RECOMMENDATION 2^, 18. The Military Committee recommends that the North 24 Atlan tic Council; - 25 a. Note this report. 26 b. Approve the SACEUR and SACLANT programmes.

j & . . '

NATO - - 7 MC 32/55 G » M g H M œ H ) APPROVED FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE DECLASSIFIED-PUBL IC DISCLOSURE IMSM-0462-0 2 DECLASSIFIE-MISE EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE

B N c) ic in 1 . 4 8 .o ases aval RECOMMENDED SACEUR „ 02 .0 . . „004 M 3 9 ------** 128 1 n o i l l i 1 ' 8.057 6.580 i ) i° . .209 40.610 „470 .262 .1*7 =389 P POL - - - - ounds C 6.982 CATtONS 6.100 S ommun *073 .199

. T 3.^00 6 ooo o .o i W .420 . .600 ( HQ 92O h ------) T Ï Ï ^ SITES^ .616 . .602 0 SAM ------l 4 9 949 4 *9 9 SSM Sl TES t t - - ■ ------> J - . 9^9 A MME SAS SITES • . . .230 < 1 (<0 - - - 350 - - _ - - - 120 S D 3 3.O54 torage - - C - - ~ - — epots - Î . l .068 ) 22 T — 24.171 8l4 l ,8 5 4 2.134 5-737 6 3.094 1. 1.486 T . .070 95Ô 5 •9 . . .771 otal m 1 150 143 00 ■ ” ■) ® e 1 0 CtltD ^ DECLASSIFIED-PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IMSM-04S2-Q2 DECLASSIFIE-MISE EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE MC MC s; - NATO Icue s Included * Serial No, Serial - NATO fclte il otne ob aalbe o s i ec an^ peace in use for available be to continue will facilities - *5 *2 a s c as war 32/35 serial project of adoption upon dependent Total 8 7 6 6 4 3 1 a ALN EOMNE IHENHSIENT CO NATO SLICE EIGHTEENTH RECOMMENDED SACLANT ) ! G H Q F I D g g Ä Ä l i © M mm u rnl plann rrently between Portugal and Gibraltar and Portugal between TOTALS FOR COMMUNICATIONS ** COMMUNICATIONS FOR TOTALS communication and control DF ACLANT Communications of Replacement Gibraltar and Portugal between and AHQ CENTLANT CENTLANT AHQ and Norway u facilities Link: Scatter Tropospheric Tr H , BET AQ OLN (R MHQ, (Northwood), AHQ, BREST, NORLANT EASTLANT MHQ for equipment at Andoya Airfield, Andoya at radio UHF equipment and VHF of Replacement areas ACLANT/ACCHAN the In Communications Emergency Maritime RGA OAS ** TOTALS PROGRAM equipment for circuit NA2-6A circuit for equipment Provision of reserve aerial masts aerial reserve of Provision En Anthorn, station, Portu Airfield, hscl euiya L radio VLF at Security Physical improv for Provision COMMUNICATIONS recurrence against protection Espinho at damage flood Repair FACILITIE AIR MARITIME TOTAL MARITIME AIR FACILITIES AIR MARITIME TOTAL bject to confirmation by French Governme French by confirmation to bject o pospheric Scatter Link Scatter pospheric NATO D E ;T t T O LlîiPgS O OT A ^ O R P P A l i in i r u P r o f n p / m R p flp ; A L ( « RGAM {REVISED PROGRAMME e d by by d [RESTRICTED SUMMARY g al, and provide and al, ENCLO { S Plymouth) - 9 ACL g e ment of ment land n S A S s p r i i s o ism URE 2. URE NT.

o syth),

)

Enclosure Enclosure M MON INF MON 6 or or Estimated Cost Estimated (a) n .590 .100 60-720 .620 -143 -039 .017 .040 .008 .243 .030 t that t 030 6 A R 2 ASTR

.

• U ,040 ,690 -O .143 .200 .017 .008 .243 .030

0 CTURE

(b)

39 co 0