DOCSLIB.ORG

International Narcotics Chn~~~Ol Programs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Narcotics Chn~~~Ol Programs If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CHN~~~OL• w PROGRAMS HEARING Dl~FonB '.I,'lm SUBCOMMITTEE ON IN1'ERNATIONAL OPERATIONS OIl' TIll1 COMMITTEE ON :FOREiGN RELATIONS UNITED STArrES SENATE NINg'l'Y·FIFTII CONGln~RR t-mC'mm ~ESI."1IOX ON ()Ylm~Wll'l' en' 't'lm IX'l'lmXA'l'lOXAL X.\llCO'l'I(1l4 COX'l'UOIJ l'IWGRA~II."1 ;1[.\ Y n, 11m; Prilltl'd fol' thl' t1~(\ of tlH' ('ommitt(l(, Oil l"m'(ligll H(llntltlllH "(I,S. GOYEIlNMENT rmNTING OFFICg WASIUNG'l'ON : 10i8 _. COMMI'ITEE ON FOHEIGN RELATIONS JOHN SPAHKMAN, Alabama, Chairman FRANK CHUHCH, Idaho CLlf.'FORD P. CASE, New Jersey CLAlBOHNE PELL, Hhode Island JACOB K. JAVITS, New York GEORGE McGOVEHN, South Dakota JAMES B. PEARSON, Kansns DiCI{ CLARI<, Iowa CHARlES H. PERCY, Illinois JOSEPH R. BlDEN, JII., Delaware ROBERT P. GRIFFIN, Michigan JOr-IN GLENN, Ohio HOWARD H. BAKEH, JII., Tennessee RICHARD STONE, Florida PAUL S. SAUBANES. Maryland MURIEL HUMPHREY, Minnesota NOIIVII.L JONf:S, Chief of Staff AnNER E. K£NDIUCK, Chief Clerk SUBCOMMI'ITEE ON INTERNATIONAL OPERA'£rONS GEORGE S. McGOVERN, South Dakota, Chairman CLAIBORNE PELL, Rhode Island CHARLES H. PERCY, Illinois JOSEPH R. BlDEN, JR., Delaware HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., Tennessee Staff John R. Hitch David Kenney til) APR ~. '.'t: CONTENTS I1l'ul'ing duy: Muy !I, 1!17H ............................................................................................................. Slutl'mt'llts by·_· Alluya. lIon. 'l'onE'Y, IIttOI'I1l'Y gt·lll'rul. New l\INcico ....................................... .. 2 Alldl'rHon. Willium .J., J)t.'/luty Dit·(·ctOI', ol'lll'l'U I GoVt'!'IlIlll'lH Divisioll, OC'Ilf!"al Accounting Office ..: ................................... ,........................................ ,. 11) BOUrlll'. Pl'tt·!" Spt'ciul Assistant 10 the' Prl'sident for Hl'lIith Issul's. TIlt' \Vhitt' Iiousl' ................................................................................ ,........................ L4 Dickl·rsoll. O. It. Dt>puty COllllllissionl'r. U.S. Customs Sl'l'vict'. Dl'ptIl·tlllt'nt of thl' 'l'rl'llSur:t .. :........................................................... , ................................... lH Fink. Willilllll (1., Assistant Adllliniotl'lltor. Ornel' of Intl'lJigl'ncl'. Drug Bnforcl'lllent Administmtion. Dcpllt'tml.'nt of Justicl' ................................. .. 2·1 SavlI. Chari!'s, Associa1l' Commission!'!' rOI' gnfol'cl'll1l'nt. Immigration and NlltUl'ulizaticlI) Sl'rvicl'. Dl'partllll'nt of Justic(' ............................................ .. Stroup. Kl'ith. CXl'cutive director. Nationnl Orgnnizution for tilt' Ul'fol'lll of Mal'ihuu1\a Luws, Wmlhin.,"tun. n.c. uccompunied by Peter H. Mevers, chier counsel. NORML; grie Sirulnik. professor. Gt'org'l' Wnshington Univl'rsity Luw School ...................................................................................... 36 Will ill nlS, Richard, Assistunt Director. Domestic Policy Stuff', 'fhl' Whitl' IIousl' ................................................................... ,................................................. 27 Insl'rtiolls for the record: P"epatl'd statNIl(>llt of Willinm J. Andl'rson ..................................................... 17 PI'(>put'l'd stutl'nll'nt of G. n. Dicklll'sotl ............................................................ .. 20 p~{'p •.H·ed stlltl'ment or Richllrd J. Willimns .......... .. ....................................... 28 Audit, onal informntioll supplied by Mr. Bournl' .............................................. :34 PI·t'pnrl'd stutl'm('nt and uttnchml'nts of Mr. Stroup ..................................... .. 42 ,UII INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CON'l'ROL PROGRAMS-MEXICO 'I'UESDAY, MAY 9, 1978 UNITED S'lWrES SENA'l'E, SUDCOMMIT'rEE ON IN'I'ERNATIONAL OPERATIONS OF THE COMMI'rTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, Washington, D. C. The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:30 p.m., in room 4221, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. George McGovern (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Present: Senator McGovern. Senator MCGOVERN. One of the problems with afternoon hear­ ings is that we sometimes have to compete with Senate roUcalIs. We are in the middle of a series. I have already voted on the first two, but there may be a third one shortly. If that happens, we will go until the middle of the rollcall, and then I will have to ask you to wait until I get back. OPENING S1'A'l'EMENT This afternoon the Subcommittee on International Operations is holding an oversight hearing on the $40 million-per-year inter­ national narcotics control program. 'roday's hearing will focus on the flow of illicit drugs across the United States-Mexico border and the U.S. Government response and performance in border drug interdiction. In this connection, there have been a number of reports that Federal agencies responsible for law enforcement along the border operate almost independently, with little coordination and often duplicating each other's activities. In the judgment of many observ­ ers, these separate yet similar lines of effort are diluting border coverage and control. If this is true, perhaps we can try to clean up our own acts at our own borders before we start criticizing coun­ tries like Mexico for their drug control shortcomings. Since the late 19th Mntury, this cG._htry has invested a consider­ able amount of energy in the effort to prevent the nonmedical use of narcotics and other dangerous drugs. Beginning in 1870, with the imposition of a duty on the importation of opiumi the Federal Government has assumed a progressively larger role in the at· tempt to deal with this phenomenon. In our own time, and espe­ cially during the past decade, that role has expanded considerablv, embracing a broad spectrum of activities, both at home and abroaCl. On the international level, we fund an assistance pro~am to pro­ mote the antidrug activities of other nations. In addition, we have (1) 2 carried our own law enforcement efforts overseas and have estab­ lished a network of Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents in key drug-producing fOl'eign countries. WITNESSES This afternoon's hearing, in the form of a panel, will focus on the problem of the management of our own borders as that function relates to the flow of drugs into the United States. Following the panel, the subcommittee will hear from Keith Stroup, executive director, National Orgal1ization for the Reform of Marihuana Laws, on the pal'aquat issue. The subcommittee is interested in hearing about our border nar­ cotics efforts. To get a balanced picture, we have sought the views of concerned State officials as well as those of the principal Federal agencies involved. I think in this respect we are fortUnate in having with us today the attorney general of New Mexico, Mr. T.. dey Anaya, who has taken a deep interest in this issue and has provided strong and forceful leadership on this subject. We are also pleased to have with us Dr. Peter Bourne, Special Assistant to the President for Health Issues. From the Federal agencies, we have Mr. William Anderson, Deputy Director, General Government Division, General Accounting Office; Mr. G. R. Dicker­ son, Deputy Commissioner, Enforcement, Immigration and Natu­ ralization Services; and Mr. Gordon Fink, Assistant Administrator for the Office of Intelligence, Drug Enforcement Administration. Gentlemen, on behalf of myself and the subcommittee, we want to welcome you here this afternoon. In view of the fact that we have a number of witnesses to be heard, I suggest each one of you open with a brief statement and then we will save more time for the questions. We will begin with Mr. Anaya. STATEMENT OF nON. TONEY ANAYA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW MEXICO Mr. ANAYA. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I greatly appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today and present to you some of the activities the border States them­ selves have been involved in and why this issue is of great impor­ tance to us. I do have a prepared statement which I would respectfully submit in its entirety for the record, and would attempt to summa­ rize it. Senator MCGOVERN. All right, without objection, all of the pre­ pared statements will be printed in the record and each of you can summarize the highlights of your statement. Mr. ANAYA. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. EXTENT OF NARCOTICS TRAFFICKING PROBLEM Most of the remarks I make will pertain to New Mexico, but could easily apply to Arizona, Texas, and California, the four border States borderin~ Mexico. The probleJm of narcotics traffick­ ing is a big problem In New Mexico. It is, beyond a doubt, our single biggest crime problem in the State. It is compounded by the 3 fact that we do border Mexico, and the heavy traffic-we are a conduit, the State of New Mexico is a conduit for the narcotics trafficking from Mexico and other South American countries. In 1975, by way of emphasizing th,') extent to the problem, the latest DEA figures we have available show that 89 percent of the heroin reaching us came from poppies grown in Mexico. Of the marihuana coming to the United States, 75 percent originated in Mexico. A third of the Colombian cocaine passed through Mexico, and one-third of the dangerous drugs entered from Mexico. To the extent that these figures have changed, perhaps some of the other Federal officials might bring us up to date, but it high­ lights the extent to the problem, Mr. Chairman, that we face with our bordering with Mexico. We have many wide-open spaces with many landing strips for small aircraft. There is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fizzling the Plutonium Economy: Origins of the April 1977 Carter Administration Fuel Cycle Policy Transition
    Fizzling the Plutonium Economy: Origins of the April 1977 Carter Administration Fuel Cycle Policy Transition The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Williams, Peter King. 2010. Fizzling the Plutonium Economy: Origins of the April 1977 Carter Administration Fuel Cycle Policy Transition. Master's thesis, Harvard University, Extension School. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37367548 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Fizzling the Plutonium Economy: Origins of the April 1977 Carter Administration Fuel Cycle Policy Transition Peter Williams A Thesis in the Field of History for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University May 2010 © 2010 Peter Williams Abstract This study examines the scientific advocacy that shaped President Carter’s April 1977 policy decision to block the domestic implementation of so-called “plutonium economy” technologies, and thereby mandate the use of an “open” or “once–through” fuel cycle for U.S. nuclear power reactors. This policy transition was controversial, causing friction with U.S. allies, with the nuclear power industry, and with Congress. Early in his presidential campaign, Carter criticized the excessive federal financial commitment to developing plutonium-based reactors and adopted the view that the weapons proliferation risks of plutonium economy technologies were serious and needed to be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S10191
    October 1, 2008 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S10191 are confident we will be able to restore by the House of Representatives under If you look at this map—I will leave the circulatory system, if you will, and the leadership of HOWARD BERMAN, the it up for a good part of the day—you regain health for the economy—the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Com- will appreciate, aside from the agree- body, if you will—and get the problem mittee of that body. ment itself, the strategic importance fixed for the American people. I have a letter from the Secretary of of this relation for the United States. I said yesterday that we are going to State, as well as other supporting in- India has become a major actor in fix this problem this week. The Senate formation, that leads us to the conclu- the world, and it increasingly sees will speak tonight. We will send to the sion that this bill ought to be passed, itself in concert with other global pow- House a package that, if passed, will and passed, I hope, overwhelmingly by ers, rather than in opposition to them. address the issue. this body because of the message it Indian Prime Minister Singh, who We will have demonstrated to the would send not only to the people and visited Washington just last week, has American people that we can deal with the Government of India but others as devoted energy and political courage in the crisis in the most difficult of well about the direction we intend to forging this agreement, and in seeking times—right before an election, when take in the 21st century about this approval for it in India.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR DENNIS HAYS Interviewed by: Raymond Ewing Initial interview date: November 28, 2001 Copyright 2008 AD T TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born into a S Navy family, raised in the S and abroad niversity of Florida, Harvard niversity Clerk, Congressional Sub-Committee Office Entered the Foreign Service in 1975 Kingston, ,amaica- Consular .visa/0 Admin Officer 1977-1979 1osalynn Carter visit S Ambassadors Operations State Department2 Presidential 3isits Officer, Admin. Bureau 1979-1981 3IP visits abroad Operations 7hite House Communications Agency Iran hostage homecoming Harvard niversity- Kennedy School of 8overnment 1981-1982 Michael Dukakis President, ,unior Foreign Service Officers; Association President, American Foreign Service Officers; Association 1982-1985 Operations —Exclusive Bargaining“ issue Foreign Service Act of 1980 AID membership 1elations with Congress Board membership The —Black Dragons“ AFSA accomplishments The Foreign Service ,ournal Tandem assignments 1 Bujumbura, Burundi- Deputy Chief of Mission 1985-1988 Hutus and Tutsis ,ean-Baptista BagaAa AIDS Peace Corps Environment Foreign Missions Security 8overnment Coup S AID program SIS programs 8eorgetown, 8uyana- Deputy Chief of Mission 1988-1992 8uyanese emigration President Forbes Burnham Environment Elections Economy Border issues AmaAon 1iver development S interests ,onestown Affair 8overnment British SIA Carter Center National 7ar College 1992-1993 State Department- Coordinator
    [Show full text]
  • IATSE and Labor Movement News
    FIRST QUARTER, 2012 NUMBER 635 FEATURES Report of the 10 General Executive Board January 30 - February 3, 2012, Atlanta, Georgia Work Connects Us All AFL-CIO Launches New 77 Campaign, New Website New IATSE-PAC Contest 79 for the “Stand up, Fight Back” Campaign INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES, MOVING PICTURE TECHNICIANS, ARTISTS AND ALLIED CRAFTS OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO, CLC EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Matthew D. Loeb James B. Wood International President General Secretary–Treasurer Thomas C. Short Michael W. Proscia International General Secretary– President Emeritus Treasurer Emeritus Edward C. Powell International Vice President Emeritus Timothy F. Magee Brian J. Lawlor 1st Vice President 7th Vice President 900 Pallister Ave. 1430 Broadway, 20th Floor Detroit, MI 48202 New York, NY 10018 DEPARTMENTS Michael Barnes Michael F. Miller, Jr. 2nd Vice President 8th Vice President 2401 South Swanson Street 10045 Riverside Drive Philadelphia, PA 19148 Toluca Lake, CA 91602 4 President’s 74 Local News & Views J. Walter Cahill John T. Beckman, Jr. 3rd Vice President 9th Vice President Newsletter 5010 Rugby Avenue 1611 S. Broadway, #110 80 On Location Bethesda, MD 20814 St Louis, MO 63104 Thom Davis Daniel DiTolla 5 General Secretary- 4th Vice President 10th Vice President 2520 West Olive Avenue 1430 Broadway, 20th Floor Treasurer’s Message 82 Safety Zone Burbank, CA 91505 New York, NY 10018 Anthony M. DePaulo John Ford 5th Vice President 11th Vice President 6 IATSE and Labor 83 On the Show Floor 1430 Broadway, 20th Floor 326 West 48th Street New York, NY 10018 New York, NY 10036 Movement News Damian Petti John M.
    [Show full text]
  • DREAM 35 DREAM Act Reintroduced in Congress
    Table of Contents The American Civil Liberties 1 AFL-CIO 2 American Federation of Teachers 3 The American Immigration Lawyers Association 4 Asian American Center for Advancing Justice 6 Campus Progress 8 Center for American Progress 9 First Focus 10 The Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities 12 Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society 13 The Immigrant Legal Resource Center 14 Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service 15 Metro Organizations for People 17 The National Korean American Service & Education Consortium 18 The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials 21 National Latina Institution for Reproductive Health 22 National Council of La Raza 23 The National Education Association 25 National Immigration Law Center 26 People for the American Way 27 People for the American Way – African American Ministers in Action 28 People for the American Way – Young People for Action 29 The PICO National Network 30 Service Employees International Union 31 Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. 32 United States Conference of Catholic Bishops 34 United We DREAM 35 DREAM Act Reintroduced In Congress Bill Would Help Promote Fairness And Equality In Access To Higher Education, Says ACLU FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 11, 2011 CONTACT: Claire O’Brien, (202) 675-2312; [email protected] WASHINGTON – The American Civil Liberties Union today welcomed the reintroduction in the Senate of the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, a bill that promotes fair access to higher education for all high school students, regardless of immigration status. The DREAM Act, reintroduced today by Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL) and 31 co-sponsors, came close to passage in the previous Congress, passing in the House and falling just five votes short of the 60 required to move forward in the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ftongresa Qf Lift Mmteii BC 20515
    (ftongresa Qf lift Mmteii BC 20515 December 7,2006 The Honorable Sheila Bair Chairman Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 550 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20429 Dear Chairman Bair: We urge you to extend for at least an additional six months, the moratorium on deposit insurance applications for new industrial loan companies (ILCs) and on changes in control of ILCs by commercial firms, which is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2007. This extension is necessary to allow the 110th Congress, which will take office on January 3, 2007, an opportunity to act on this important public policy issue. An extension of the moratorium on applications by commercial firms will allow Congress to provide the FDIC with direction on the extent to which commercial firms should be allowed to enter the banking business through ownership of ELCs. Since it is applications for deposit insurance by commercial firms that raise the issue of the mixing of banking and commerce we urge that the moratorium be extended for those pending and future applications. Applications that involve ownership by financial firms do not raise these issues and we do not object to lifting the moratorium on those applications. As you know, Rep. Gillmor and Rep. Frank have introduced legislation this Congress, H.R. 5746, to address the issues raised by the rapid expansion of the ILC charter. We expect that similar legislation will be introduced early in the next Congress, and that it may be considered early in the session, but clearly there will not be time for the Congress to act before the current FDIC moratorium expires.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the California Redistricting Commission
    ELECTION LAW JOURNAL Volume 11, Number 4, 2012 # Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/elj.2012.1148 Adventures in Redistricting: A Look at the California Redistricting Commission Karin Mac Donald ABSTRACT California’s Voters FIRST Act created the Citizens Redistricting Commission and with it provided a unique opportunity to observe the implementation of one of the most challenging political processes: the creation of electoral districts by a body of non-elected voters. Despite many predictions and accusations to the con- trary, this first-time experiment in participatory democracy experienced remarkably few glitches while achieving a successful outcome. This article provides an overview of the many factors and actors that played significant roles in this reform effort, and provides participant-observations illuminating some strengths and weaknesses of the process. he successful process of redistricting for its transparency3 and openness to public input,4 T California via the independent Citizen Redis- despite multiple lawsuits that unsuccessfully chal- tricting Commission (CRC)1 has prompted other lenged its districts,5 and an unsuccessful referendum jurisdictions to consider whether a move away in November 2012 to overturn the state senate plan.6 from drawing lines by its legislative bodies might There has already been some scholarship about be advisable.2 The CRC’s work has been praised the 2011 California Redistricting,7 most of it Karin Mac Donald is the director of the California Statewide Data- process-that-puts-voters-first > (remarks by California For- base and Election Administration Research Center at the Univer- ward, one of the sponsors of the Voters FIRST Act, on the sity of California, Berkeley Law, Berkeley, CA, and the owner and CRC’s successful implementation and transparent process).
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States ______
    No. 19A60 In the Supreme Court of the United States _______________________________ DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., Applicants, v. SIERRA CLUB, ET AL. _______________________________ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF AND BRIEF OF FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AS AMICI CURIAE SUPPORTING MOTION TO LIFT STAY _______________________________ Douglas A. Winthrop Irvin B. Nathan Counsel of Record Robert N. Weiner ARNOLD & PORTER Andrew T. Tutt KAYE SCHOLER LLP Kaitlin Konkel 10th Floor Samuel F. Callahan Three Embarcadero Center ARNOLD & PORTER San Francisco, CA 94111 KAYE SCHOLER LLP (415) 471-3100 601 Massachusetts Ave., NW [email protected] Washington, DC 20001 (202) 942-5000 [email protected] Attorneys for Amici Curiae No. 19A60 In the Supreme Court of the United States _______________________________ DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., Applicants, v. SIERRA CLUB, ET AL. _______________________________ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF _______________________________ Amici curiae, a bipartisan group of more than 100 former Members of Congress, move for leave to file the accompanying brief in support of plaintiffs’ motion to lift this Court’s July 26, 2019 stay of the injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in this case.1 Amici filed briefs supporting plaintiffs in the district court and the court of appeals in the proceedings both before and after this Court’s stay. Plaintiffs now seek to lift this Court’s July 2019 stay to ensure that the defendants cannot complete their unauthorized construction activities before this Court can act on a petition for a writ of certiorari.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress and Israel”
    Council for the National Interest (CNI) Public Hearing on Capitol Hill May 29, 2008 John Mearsheimer’s Comments “Congress and Israel” I would like to thank the Council for the National Interest for organizing this event and inviting me to speak along with such distinguished and brave speakers as Uri Avnery, Menachem Klein, and Edward Peck. I would also like to thank all of you for coming out to hear us speak. It is widely recognized that the US is in serious trouble in the Middle East. Therefore, one would expect Congress to be holding hearings to determine what has gone wrong in that strategically important region, and what might be done to fix the problems we face. In particular, one would expect Congress to examine American policy toward Israel. After all, the US-Israel relationship, to quote from a recent AIPAC press release, “is the keystone of America’s policy in the Middle East.” But such hearings are not taking place and will not happen in the foreseeable future. We all know the reason why, although few of you will say it publicly. The Israel lobby, which is probably the most powerful interest group in Washington today, and certainly the most influential foreign-policy interest group in American history, will not allow either the House or the Senate to critically examine the “special relationship” between Israel and the US which it has worked long and hard to build. Instead, the lobby demands that legislators support Israel generously and unconditionally, and the lobby usually gets what it wants. Of course, anyone who says that the Israel lobby profoundly influences US Middle East policy is likely to be called an anti-Semite or some other terrible name.
    [Show full text]
  • Reefer Madness in Federal Court: an Overview of How Federal Courts Are Dealing with Cannabis Litigation and Why It Is Necessary to “Dig Into the Weeds”
    Marvis Formatting Complete (Do Not Delete) 7/27/2019 4:36 PM REEFER MADNESS IN FEDERAL COURT: AN OVERVIEW OF HOW FEDERAL COURTS ARE DEALING WITH CANNABIS LITIGATION AND WHY IT IS NECESSARY TO “DIG INTO THE WEEDS” by Blake Marvis* Litigation stemming from the state-legal cannabis industry has presented many unique questions for federal courts to grapple with. Can federal courts provide equitable relief to state-legal cannabis litigants, despite being in violation of federal law? Can workers in the state-legal cannabis industry sue their employ- ers to recover required minimum wage under federal statutes? Is a contract that is made in a state-legal cannabis market automatically void? This Com- ment examines the precarious nature of state-legal cannabis litigation in fed- eral courts through a dissection of how litigation has progressed. It also exam- ines the framing of the arguments made in cannabis disputes. Although the litigation related to the state-legal cannabis industry has been very diverse, this Comment attempts to provide a synthesis of the fundamental principles courts are viewing these disputes from. This Comment argues that two relatively dis- tinct views have emerged as a result of the unclear legal status of the state-legal cannabis industry. One view, the “Broad View,” focuses on how federal ille- gality creates broad barriers to otherwise clear legal rights that “normal” busi- ness industry participants would have. The other view, the “Narrow View,” focuses on the uniqueness of the state-legal cannabis industry and attempts to navigate the issues carefully and narrowly. This Comment further argues for adoption of the Narrow View from both a legal and policy perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Music and the Seamier Side of the Rural South Cecil Kirk Hutson Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1995 The ad rker side of Dixie: southern music and the seamier side of the rural South Cecil Kirk Hutson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Folklore Commons, Music Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hutson, Cecil Kirk, "The ad rker side of Dixie: southern music and the seamier side of the rural South " (1995). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 10912. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/10912 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthiough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproductioiL In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing Knowledge in the War on Drugs: a Foucauldian Analysis of the Marijuana Discourse in the Late 1960S and Early 1970S
    POLICING KNOWLEDGE IN THE WAR ON DRUGS: A FOUCAULDIAN ANALYSIS OF THE MARIJUANA DISCOURSE IN THE LATE 1960S AND EARLY 1970S A Thesis by ETHAN RICE BA, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 2013 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER of ARTS in HISTORY Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, Texas May 2017 © Ethan Cody Rice All Rights Reserved May 2017 POLICING KNOWLEDGE IN THE WAR ON DRUGS: A FOUCAULDIAN ANALYSIS OF THE MARIJUANA DISCOURSE IN THE LATE 1960S AND EARLY 1970S A Thesis by ETHAN RICE This thesis meets the standards for scope and quality of Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi and is hereby approved. Sandrine Sanos, PhD Laura Muñoz , PhD Chair Committee Member Anthony Quiroz, PhD Committee Member May 2017 ABSTRACT Many histories of marijuana prohibition see the 1960s and 1970s as a time of relatively lax attitudes towards marijuana use, with scholars pointing to a softening of the penalties for low- level offenses. However, focusing solely on policy and failing to scrutinize how the discourse on drugs worked to marginalize users and underwrite enforcement efforts overlooks the extent to which this era represents a time of increasing obsession with controlling marijuana and other drug use. Michel Foucault’s work on the relationship between knowledge and power provides a useful framework through which this discourse can be elucidated. Foucault describes discourse as both productive and disciplinary: it produces categories of knowledge and simultaneously regulates what can be known through what it includes, excludes, or limits. Thus, it exerts a power distinct from the coercive power of the law: the power to determine the acceptability of a behavior and what is known about it.
    [Show full text]