Aralen® Chloroquine Phosphate, Usp
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Doxycycline and Hydroxychloroquine As Treatment for High-Risk COVID-19 Patients: Experience
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.18.20066902; this version posted May 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Doxycycline and Hydroxychloroquine as Treatment for High-Risk COVID-19 Patients: Experience from Case Series of 54 Patients in Long-Term Care Facilities Imtiaz Ahmad, MD, MPH, FCCP1 Mohammud Alam, MD2 Ryan Saadi, MD, MPH3,6 Saborny Mahmud4 Emily Saadi, BS5 1Allergy, Sleep & Lung Care, 21st Century Oncology, Fort Myers, FL 2Infectious Disease Specialist, Cordial Medical PC, Farmingdale, NY 3Center for Market Access and Medical Innovation, Warren, NJ 4 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 5 Yale University, School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 6Quantaira Health, New York, NY Corresponding author : Imtiaz Ahmad, MD, Allergy, Sleep & Lung Care, 21st Century Oncology, Fort Myers, FL. email : [email protected] NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.18.20066902; this version posted May 22, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Abstract: Importance: Patients in long-term care facilities (LTCF) are at a high-risk of contracting COVID-19 due to advanced age and multiple comorbidities. -
A Comparative Study on Ivermectin-Doxycycline and Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin Therapy on COVID-19 Patients
DOI: 10.14744/ejmo.2021.16263 EJMO 2021;5(1):63–70 Research Article A Comparative Study on Ivermectin-Doxycycline and Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin Therapy on COVID-19 Patients Abu Taiub Mohammed Mohiuddin Chowdhury,1 Mohammad Shahbaz,2 Md Rezaul Karim,3 Jahirul Islam, Guo Dan,1 Shuixiang He1 1Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, P.R. China 2Chakoria Upazilla Health Complex, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh 3Biomedical Research Institute of Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China 4Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, P.R. China Abstract Objectives: We investigated the outcomes of Ivermectin-Doxycycline vs. Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin combina- tion therapy in mild to moderate COVID19 patients. Methods: Patients were divided randomly into two groups: Ivermectin 200µgm/kg single dose + Doxycycline 100mg BID for ten days in group A, and Hydroxychloroquine 400mg for the first day, then 200mg BID for nine days + Azithro- mycin 500mg daily for five days in group B (Control group). RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 infection was repeated in all symp- tomatic patients on the second day onward without symptoms. Repeat PCR was done every two days onward if the result found positive. Time to the negative PCR and symptomatic recovery was measured for each group. Results: All subjects in Group A reached a negative PCR, at a mean of 8.93 days, and reached symptomatic recovery, at a mean of 5.93 days, with 55.10% symptom-free by the fifth day. In group B, 96.36% reached a negative PCR at a mean of 9.33 days and were symptoms-free at 6.99 days. -
Clindamycin Plus Quinine for Treating Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Charles O Obonyo1* and Elizabeth a Juma1,2
Obonyo and Juma Malaria Journal 2012, 11:2 http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/2 RESEARCH Open Access Clindamycin plus quinine for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis Charles O Obonyo1* and Elizabeth A Juma1,2 Abstract Background: Artemisinin-based combinations are recommended for treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria, but are costly and in limited supply. Clindamycin plus quinine is an alternative non-artemisinin-based combination recommended by World Health Organization. The efficacy and safety of clindamycin plus quinine is not known. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of clindamycin plus quinine versus other anti-malarial drugs in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Methods: All randomized controlled trials comparing clindamycin plus quinine with other anti-malarial drugs in treating uncomplicated malaria were included in this systematic review. Databases searched included: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS. Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. The primary outcome measure was treatment failure by day 28. Dichotomous data was compared using risk ratio (RR), in a fixed effects model. Results: Seven trials with 929 participants were included. Clindamycin plus quinine significantly reduced the risk of day 28 treatment failure compared with quinine (RR 0.14 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.29]), quinine plus sulphadoxine- pyrimethamine (RR 0.17 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.44]), amodiaquine (RR 0.11 [95% CI 0.04 to 0.27]), or chloroquine (RR 0.11 [95% CI 0.04 to 0.29]), but had similar efficacy compared with quinine plus tetracycline (RR 0.33 [95% CI 0.01 to 8.04]), quinine plus doxycycline (RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.21 to 4.66]), artesunate plus clindamycin (RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.26 to 1.24]), or chloroquine plus clindamycin (RR 0.38 [95% CI 0.13 to 1.10]). -
REACTIONS of QUININE, CHLOROQUINE, and QUINACRINE the Synthetic Antimalarial Compounds, Chloroquine
VOL. 55, 1966 BIOCHEMISTRY: O'BRIEN, OLENICK, AND HAHN 1511 * Supported by grant no. AI-05320 VR from the U.S. Public Health Service and by grant no. B-14646 from the National Science Foundation. t Address, as of July 1, 1966: The Public Health Research Institute of the City of New York, Inc., New York. 1 Fenwick, M. L., R. L. Erikson, and R. M. Franklin, Science, 146, 527 (1964). 2 Erikson, R. L., M. L. Fenwick, and R. M. Franklin, J. Mol. Biol., 13, 399 (1965). 3 Erikson, R. L., and R. M. Franklin, Bacteriol. Rev., in press. 4Erikson, R. L., M. L. Fenwick, and R. M. Franklin, J. Mol. Biol., 10, 519 (1964). 6 Franklin, R. M., and M. L. Fenwick, unpublished observations. 6 Bernardi, G., and S. N. Timasheff, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 6, 58 (1961). 7Franklin, R. M., unpublished observations. 8 Barber, R., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 114, 422 (1966). 9 Franklin, R. M., and N. Granboulan, J. Bacteriol., 91, 834 (1966). 10 Sinsheimer, R. L., B. Starman, C. Nagler, and S. Guthrie, J. Mol. Biol., 4, 142 (1962). 11 Spiegelman, S., I. Haruna, I. B. Holland, G. Beaudreau, and D. Mills, these PROCEEDINGS, 54, 919 (1965). 12 Gros, F., W. Gilbert, H. H. Hiatt, G. Attardi, P. F. Spahr, and J. D. Watson, in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, vol. 26 (1961), p. 111. 13 Shatkin, A. J., these PROCEEDINGS, 54, 1721 (1965). 14 Ammann, J., H. Delius, and P. H. Hofschneider, J. Mol. Biol., 10, 557 (1964). 15 Gesteland, R. F., and H. -
Malarial Dihydrofolate Reductase As a Paradigm for Drug Development Against a Resistance-Compromised Target
Malarial dihydrofolate reductase as a paradigm for drug development against a resistance-compromised target Yongyuth Yuthavonga,1, Bongkoch Tarnchompooa, Tirayut Vilaivanb, Penchit Chitnumsuba, Sumalee Kamchonwongpaisana, Susan A. Charmanc, Danielle N. McLennanc, Karen L. Whitec, Livia Vivasd, Emily Bongardd, Chawanee Thongphanchanga, Supannee Taweechaia, Jarunee Vanichtanankula, Roonglawan Rattanajaka, Uthai Arwona, Pascal Fantauzzie, Jirundon Yuvaniyamaf, William N. Charmanc, and David Matthewse aBIOTEC, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand Science Park, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand; bDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; cMonash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville 3052, Australia; dLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London WC1E 7HT, England; eMedicines for Malaria Venture, 1215 Geneva, Switzerland; and fDepartment of Biochemistry and Center for Excellence in Protein Structure and Function, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand Edited by Wim Hol, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and accepted by the Editorial Board September 8, 2012 (received for review March 16, 2012) Malarial dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) is the target of antifolate target is P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which is antimalarial drugs such as pyrimethamine and cycloguanil, the inhibited by the antimalarials PYR and cycloguanil (CG) (Fig. 1). clinical efficacy of which have been -
Pyrimethamine and Proguanil Are the Two Most Widely Used DHFR Inhibitor Antimalarial Drugs. Cycloguanil Is the Active Metabolite of the Proguanil (1,2)
Jpn. J. Med. Sci. Biol., 49, 1-14, 1996. IN VITRO SELECTION OF PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM LINES RESISTANT TO DIHYDROFOLATE-REDUCTASE INHIBITORS AND CROSS RESISTANCE STUDIES Virendra K. BHASIN* and Lathika NAIR Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India (Received July 27, 1995. Accepted November 6, 1995) SUMMARY: A cloned Plasmodium falciparum line was subjected to in vitro drug pressure, by employing a relapse protocol, to select progressively resistant falciparum lines to pyrimethamine and cycloguanil, the two dihydrofolate- reductase (DHFR) inhibitor antimalarial drugs. The falciparum lines resistant to pyrimethamine were selected much faster than those resistant to cycloguanil. In 348 days of selection/cultivation, there was 2,400-fold increase in IC50 value to pyrimethamine, whereas only about 75-fold decrease in sensitivity to cycloguanil was registered in 351 days. Pyrimethamine-resistant parasites acquired a degree of cross resistance to cycloguanil and methotrexate, another DHFR inhibitor, but did not show any cross resistance to some other groups of antimalarial drugs. The highly pyrimethamine-resistant line was not predisposed for faster selection to cycloguanil resistance. Resistance acquired to pyrimethamine was stable. The series of resistant lines obtained form a good material to study the •eevolution•f of resistance more meaningfully at molecular level. INTRODUCTION Pyrimethamine and proguanil are the two most widely used DHFR inhibitor antimalarial drugs. Cycloguanil is the active metabolite of the proguanil (1,2). There is abundant evidence to indicate that the pyrimethamine resistance is now widely distributed throughout malaria-endemic areas of the world (3-5). The incidence of the proguanil resistance appears to be in doubt and *To whom correspondence should be addressed . -
Chloroquine Phosphate Fact Sheet For
Alert - June 15, 2020: Based on FDA’s continued review of the scientific evidence available for hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQ) and chloroquine phosphate (CQ) to treat COVID-19, FDA has determined that the statutory criteria for EUA as outlined in Section 564(c)(2) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act are no longer met. Specifically, FDA has determined that CQ and HCQ are unlikely to be effective in treating COVID-19 for the authorized uses in the EUA. Additionally, in light of ongoing serious cardiac adverse events and other serious side effects, the known and potential benefits of CQ and HCQ no longer outweigh the known and potential risks for the authorized use. This warrants revocation of the EUA for HCQ and CQ for the treatment of COVID-19 FACT SHEET FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) OF CHLOROQUINE PHOSPHATE SUPPLIED FROM THE STRATEGIC NATIONAL STOCKPILE FOR TREATMENT OF COVID-19 IN CERTAIN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to permit the emergency use of chloroquine phosphate supplied from the Strategic National Stockpile to treat adults and adolescents who weigh 50 kg or more and are hospitalized with COVID-19 for whom a clinical trial is not available, or participation is not feasible. This EUA is for the unapproved use of chloroquine phosphate supplied from the Strategic National Stockpile to treat adults and adolescents who weigh 50 kg or more and are hospitalized with COVID-19 for whom a clinical trial is not available, orRevoked participation is not feasible. -
Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine: Efficacy in the Treatment of the COVID-19
pathogens Brief Report Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine: Efficacy in the Treatment of the COVID-19 Tzu-Chuan Ho 1,†, Yung-Hsuan Wang 2,†, Yi-Ling Chen 3,†, Wan-Chi Tsai 4 , Che-Hsin Lee 5 , Kuo-Pin Chuang 6, Yi-Ming Arthur Chen 7, Cheng-Hui Yuan 8, Sheng-Yow Ho 9 , Ming-Hui Yang 10,* and Yu-Chang Tyan 1,6,11,* 1 Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 St. Dominic Catholic High School, Kaohsiung 802, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; [email protected] 4 Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; [email protected] 5 Department of Biological Science, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan; [email protected] 6 Graduate Institute of Animal Vaccine Technology, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912, Taiwan; [email protected] 7 Graduate Institute of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan; [email protected] 8 Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore; [email protected] 9 Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan 710, Taiwan; [email protected] 10 Department of Medical Education and Research, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan Citation: Ho, T.-C.; Wang, Y.-H.; 11 Neuroscience Research Center, Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chen, Y.-L.; Tsai, W.-C.; Lee, C.-H.; Center for Cancer Research, Research Center for Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Chuang, K.-P.; Chen, Y.-M.A.; Yuan, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan C.-H.; Ho, S.-Y.; Yang, M.-H.; et al. -
Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine: a Potential and Controversial Treatment for COVID‑19
Arch. Pharm. Res. Online ISSN 1976-3786 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-020-01258-7 Print ISSN 0253-6269 REVIEW Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: a potential and controversial treatment for COVID‑19 Li Zou1 · Lijun Dai1 · Xingyu Zhang1 · Zhaohui Zhang1 · Zhentao Zhang1 Received: 6 May 2020 / Accepted: 26 July 2020 © The Pharmaceutical Society of Korea 2020 Abstract A novel coronavirus, later named SARS-CoV-2, were named as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by was frst reported in China in December 2019 and subse- World Health Organization (WHO). SARS-CoV-2 is a quently widely identifed in the United States, Japan, South β-coronavirus and its genomic sequence is 96.2% identical Korea, France, India, and other countries. The disease to that of Bat-SARSs-CoV RaTG13 and 79.5% identical to caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection was called COVID-19. that of SARS-CoV. Based on the sequencing results and evo- The high fatality and morbidity rates of COVID-19 make lutionary analysis of the viral genome, bats are suspected to it the third largest global epidemic in this century. How- be the natural hosts of SARS-CoV-2, while the intermediate ever, there are currently no approved antiviral drugs for the host is unknown. Previous studies have shown that SARS- COVID-19 treatment. Recently, two old antimalarial drugs, CoV-2, like SARS-CoV, can infect human cells that express hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, have been found to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) (Guo et al. 2020). exert anti-SARS-CoV-2 efects both in vitro and in vivo. -
Guidelines for Treatment of Malaria in the United States 1 (Based on Drugs Currently Available for Use in the United States — October 1, 2019)
Guidelines for Treatment of Malaria in the United States 1 (Based on drugs currently available for use in the United States — October 1, 2019) CDC Malaria Hotline: (770) 488-7788 or (855) 856-4713 (toll free) Monday–Friday, 9 am to 5 pm EST; (770) 488-7100 after hours, weekends, and holidays Clinical Diagnosis/ Drug Susceptibility (Based on Recommended Regimen and Adult Dose1 Recommended Regimen and Pediatric Dose1 Plasmodium Species Region Infection Was Acquired) Pediatric dose should NEVER exceed adult dose Uncomplicated malaria/ Chloroquine resistance or unknown A. Artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem™)3,4 P. falciparum, or resistance2 Tablet=20mg artemether/ 120 mg lumefantrine species not identified All malarious regions except those specified A 3-day treatment schedule with a total of 6 oral doses is recommended for both adult and pediatric patients based on as chloroquine sensitive listed in the box weight. The patient should receive the initial dose, followed by the second dose 8 hours later, then 1 dose bid for the If “species not identified” below following 2 days. Dosing as follows: is later diagnosed as P. 5–<15 kg: 1 tablet per dose vivax or P. ovale, please 15–<25 kg: 2 tablets per dose see P. vivax and P. ovale 25–<35 kg: 3 tablets per dose (below) re: treatment with ≥35 kg: 4 tablets per dose primaquine or tafenoquine B. Atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone™)4,5 B. Atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone™)4,5 Adult tablet= 250 mg atovaquone/ 100 mg proguanil Adult tab=250 mg atovaquone/ 100 mg proguanil 4 adult tabs po qd x 3 days Peds tab=62.5 mg atovaquone/ 25 mg proguanil 5–<8 kg: 2 peds tabs po qd x 3 days 8–<10 kg: 3 peds tabs po qd x 3 days 10–<20 kg: 1 adult tab po qd x 3 days 20–<30 kg: 2 adult tabs po qd x 3 days 30–<40 kg: 3 adult tabs po qd x 3 days ≥40 kg: 4 adult tabs po qd x 3 days C. -
Treatment of Malaria in the United States a Systematic Review
CLINICAL REVIEW CLINICIAN’S CORNER Treatment of Malaria in the United States A Systematic Review Kevin S. Griffith, MD, MPH Context Many US clinicians and laboratory personnel are unfamiliar with the diag- Linda S. Lewis, DVM, MPVM nosis and treatment of malaria. Sonja Mali, MPH Objectives To examine the evidence base for management of uncomplicated and severe malaria and to provide clinicians with practical recommendations for the diag- Monica E. Parise, MD nosis and treatment of malaria in the United States. VEN THOUGH ENDEMIC MALARIA Evidence Acquisition Systematic MEDLINE search from 1966 to 2006 using the has been eliminated from the search term malaria (with the subheadings congenital, diagnosis, drug therapy, epi- United States, it remains a lead- demiology, and therapy). Additional references were obtained from searching the bib- ing infectious disease world- liographies of pertinent articles and by reviewing articles suggested by experts in the Ewide. As a consequence, every year in treatment of malaria in North America. the United States an average 1200 cases Evidence Synthesis Important measures to reduce morbidity and mortality from of malaria are reported, almost all im- malaria in the United States include the following: obtaining a travel history, consid- ported, resulting in up to 13 deaths per ering malaria in the differential diagnosis of fever based on the travel history, and year.1 The unfamiliarity of US clini- prompt and accurate diagnosis and treatment. Chloroquine remains the treatment cians and laboratory personnel with ma- of choice for Plasmodium falciparum acquired in areas without chloroquine- resistant strains. In areas with chloroquine resistance, a combination of atovaquone laria and drug resistance patterns has and proguanil or quinine plus tetracycline or doxycycline or clindamycin are the best contributed to delays in diagnosis and treatment options. -
Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5 – Analytic Database Studies
Arrhythmogenic potential of drugs FP7-HEALTH-241679 http://www.aritmo-project.org/ Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5 – Analytic Database Studies V 1.3 Draft Lead beneficiary: EMC Date: 03/01/2010 Nature: Report Dissemination level: D5.2 Report on Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5: Conduct of Additional Observational Security: Studies. Author(s): Gianluca Trifiro’ (EMC), Giampiero Version: v1.1– 2/85 Mazzaglia (F-SIMG) Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT INFOOMATION AND HISTORY ...........................................................................4 DEFINITIONS .................................................... ERRORE. IL SEGNALIBRO NON È DEFINITO. ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................6 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................7 2. STUDY OBJECTIVES................................ ERRORE. IL SEGNALIBRO NON È DEFINITO. 3. METHODS ..........................................................................................................................8 3.1.STUDY DESIGN ....................................................................................................................8 3.2.DATA SOURCES ..................................................................................................................9 3.2.1. IPCI Database .....................................................................................................9