DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplementary Material

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplementary Material Somateria mollissima (Common Eider) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 5 Sources of reported national population data p. 8 Species factsheet bibliography p. 13 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Somateria mollissima (Common Eider) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Denmark 23,000 3 2011 medium 0 0 1999-2011 good + 100-1000 1980-2011 good DK: Faroe Is 6,000 1 2002 medium ? ? DK: Greenland 50,000-100,000 8 2000-2012 medium + 200-300 2000-2012 medium + 200-300 1980-2012 medium Estonia 2,000-4,000 <1 2008-2012 medium - 50-70 2001-2012 medium 0 0-10 1980-2012 medium Finland 94,000-132,600 13 2006-2012 good - 44-62 2001-2012 good - 41-58 1980-2012 good France 1 <1 2011 good - 80-90 1999-2011 good - 80-90 1985-2011 good Germany 1,000-1,400 <1 2005-2009 good + 11-40 1998-2009 medium 0 0 1985-2009 medium Iceland 300,000 35 1990 good - 10-29 2001-2007 medium + 30-50 1980-1990 poor Rep. Ireland 160 <1 2012 medium + 2000-2012 medium + 1980-2012 medium Italy 3-6 <1 2006-2013 good 0 0 2001-2012 medium + 1999-2012 Netherlands 4,300-5,000 1 2009-2010 good - 37-62 2002-2011 medium - 23-39 1981-2011 medium Norway 150,000 17 2013 good - 0-10 2000-2013 poor F 0 1982-2013 medium NO: Svalbard 20,000-27,500 3 2001-2013 poor ? ? Poland 0-1 <1 2008-2012 medium F 0 1997-2012 medium + 1997-2012 Russia 40,000-50,000 5 2003-2011 good ? ? Sweden 73,000-127,000 12 2008-2012 good - 50-70 2001-2012 good - 40-60 1980-2012 good Switzerland 1-3 <1 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 good 0 0 1988-2012 good Ukraine 700-1,100 <1 2000 medium - 10-15 2001-2012 medium - 15-30 1980-2012 medium United Kingdom 27,000 3 2004-2009 medium - 15 1990-2006 good + 35 1970-2006 good EU27 224,000-320,000 31 Decreasing Europe 791,000-955,000 100 Decreasing 1 See 'Sources' at end of factsheet, and for more details on individual EU Member State reports, see the Article 12 reporting portal at http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/article12/report. 2 The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 In the few cases where population size estimates were reported in units other than those specified, they were converted to the correct units using standard correction factors. 4 The robustness of regional trends to the effects of any missing or incomplete data was tested using plausible scenarios, based on other sources of information, including any other reported information, recent national Red Lists, scientific literature, other publications and consultation with relevant experts. 5 Trend directions are reported as: increasing (+); decreasing (-); stable (0); fluctuating (F); or unknown (?). 6 Trend magnitudes are rounded to the nearest integer. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Somateria mollissima (Common Eider) Table 2. Reported national wintering population sizes and trends in Europe1. Note that some countries within the species' wintering range did not report any data, and that only minimum totals are presented, to avoid double-counting of birds moving between countries. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (individuals)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Albania 1-9 <1 2002-2012 medium - 20-50 2002-2012 medium ? Belarus 0 <1 2009-2013 good ? - 100 1981-1997 medium Belgium 5-10 <1 2008-2012 good - 2001-2012 good - 95-100 1980-2012 good Bulgaria 0-20 <1 1997-2012 good F 0-200 2000-2012 medium + 0-100 1980-2012 good Denmark 140,000 5 2008 good - 50-100 2000-2011 good - 50-100 1980-2011 good DK: Faroe Is 5,000-15,000 <1 1992 medium ? ? DK: Greenland 1,000,000-1,500,000 40 2000-2012 medium + 10-50 2000-2012 poor + 10-50 1980-2012 poor Estonia 10-50 <1 2008-2012 medium - 20-50 2001-2012 medium - 50-70 1980-2012 medium France 410-1,700 <1 2009-2012 medium ? - 71 1980-2012 medium Germany 320,000 10 2000-2005 good - 11-100 1997-2009 medium - 21-100 1980-2005 medium Iceland 566,072-1,127,396 26 2006-2008 good - 33 2000-2014 0 0 1980-2014 Rep. Ireland 470 <1 2006-2011 medium + 448 1999-2011 good ? Italy 98-171 <1 2007-2009 good F 0-40 2000-2009 good F 0-35 1991-2009 good Netherlands 58,853-83,885 2 2006-2010 good - 31-56 2000-2011 medium - 28-56 1981-2011 medium Norway 250,000-500,000 12 1994-2003 medium - 0-10 2000-2012 ? Poland 600-6,000 <1 2011-2012 medium F 0 2005-2012 good ? Russia 19,500-19,520 1 2003 good - 10-20 1996-2006 poor + 100-110 1977-2005 good Serbia 0 <1 2008-2012 medium ? ? Slovenia 0-1 <1 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 medium - 0-100 1980-2012 medium Spain 1 <1 2008-2010 medium F 0 2000-2010 good F 0 1980-2010 good Sweden 55,000-80,000 2 2008-2012 good 0 0 2001-2012 medium + 400 1980-2012 medium Switzerland 30-55 <1 2008-2012 good - 40-50 2001-2012 medium - 70-80 1980-2012 good Turkey 5-20 <1 2002-2012 poor ? ? Ukraine 100-300 <1 1998-2009 medium - 10-15 1998-2009 medium - 25-30 1980-2009 medium United Kingdom 63,000 2 2004-2008 medium - 11 1999-2010 medium - 28 1980-2010 medium EU27 638,000-695,000 22 Decreasing Europe 2,480,000-3,860,000 100 Decreasing THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Somateria mollissima (Common Eider) Table 2. Reported national wintering population sizes and trends in Europe1. Note that some countries within the species' wintering range did not report any data, and that only minimum totals are presented, to avoid double-counting of birds moving between countries. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (individuals)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality 1 See 'Sources' at end of factsheet, and for more details on individual EU Member State reports, see the Article 12 reporting portal at http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/article12/report. 2 The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 In the few cases where population size estimates were reported in units other than those specified, they were converted to the correct units using standard correction factors. 4 The robustness of regional trends to the effects of any missing or incomplete data was tested using plausible scenarios, based on other sources of information, including any other reported information, recent national Red Lists, scientific literature, other publications and consultation with relevant experts. 5 Trend directions are reported as: increasing (+); decreasing (-); stable (0); fluctuating (F); or unknown (?). 6 Trend magnitudes are rounded to the nearest integer. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Trend maps A symbol appears in each country where the species occurs: the shape and colour of the symbol represent the population trend in that country, and the size of the symbol corresponds to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. KEY Ç Large increase (≥50%) È Large decrease (≥50%) Ç Moderate increase (20–49%) È Moderate decrease (20–49%) Ç Small increase (<20%) È Small decrease (<20%) ñ Increase of unknown magnitude ò Decrease of unknown magnitude å Stable or fluctuating 0 Unknown ¢ Present (no population or trend data) Ð Extinct since 1980 Each symbol, with the exception of Present and Extinct, may occur in up to three different size classes, corresponding to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • King Eiders Mated with Common Eiders in Iceland
    KING EIDERS MATED WITH COMMON EIDERS IN ICELAND BY OLIN SEWALL PETTINGILL, JR. HE Common Eider (Somateriu mollissima) is one of Icelands’ most T abundant birds, with an estimated breeding population of a half million individuals (see Pettingill, 1959). Th e majority nest in colonies whose sizes range from a few pairs to many hundreds. From May 24 to 27, 1958, it was my good fortune to study and film one of the largest colonies (5,000 nests), situated on the farm of Gisli Vagnsson, along the DyrafjSrdur in Northwest Iceland. Egg-laying at this time was virtually completed, with incubation just getting under way. In my earlier paper (op. cit.) I have described the colony and pointed out that the males were present, each one stationed close to a nest while his mate sat on it. Many nests were near together-in a few cases as close as two feet, with the result that there was marked hostility among the guarding males. Presumably the males departed from the colony after the first ten days of incubation as they did on the Inner Farne (Tinbergen, 1958)) an island off the northeast coast of England. Before I visited the Vagnsson colony, Dr. Finnur Gudmundsson, Curator in the Natural History Museum at Reykjavik, told me that I should expect to find from one to several male King Eiders (S. spectabilis) mated with female Common Eiders. He had noted many mixed pairs himself in various Iceland colonies and once published an account of his observations (Gudmundsson, 1932:96-97). He went on to say that such matings are of “frequent occur- rence” in Iceland and have been known about since the 18th Century.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information
    Supporting Information Balk et al. 10.1073/pnas.0902903106 Movie S1. A paralyzed herring gull (Larus argentatus). This movie shows a specimen from the County of So¨ dermanland (region G in Fig. 1). Both wings are equally paralyzed and the beak has no strength, whereas mobility and control of the head still remain. In this work we demonstrate that the probability to remedy an individual in this condition by thiamine treatment is very high. The movie is taken in the field, but the specimen is placed on a black tablecloth in order to remove disturbing background and enhance contrast. Movie S1 (AVI) Other Supporting Information Files SI Appendix Balk et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0902903106 1of1 Supporting Information Wild birds of declining European species are dying from a thiamine deficiency syndrome L. Balk*, P.-Å. Hägerroth, G. Åkerman, M. Hanson, U. Tjärnlund, T. Hansson, G. T. Hallgrimsson, Y. Zebühr, D. Broman, T. Mörner, H. Sundberg *Corresponding author: [email protected] Contents Pages M & M Materials and Methods. 2–10 Text S1 Additional bird species affected by the paralytic disease. 11 Text S2 Additional results for eggs. 12–13 Text S3 Results for liver body index (LBI) in pulli. 14–15 Text S4 Breeding output and population estimates. 16–18 Text S5 Elaborated discussion of important aspects. 19–27 Acknowl. Further acknowledgements. 28 Fig. S1 a–j The 83 locations where samples were collected. 29–30 Fig. S2 a–d Pigmentation changes in the iris of the herring gull (Larus argentatus). 31 Fig. S3 Liver α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (KGDH) in common black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus).
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Field Naturalist Published by the Florida Ornithological Society
    Florida Field Naturalist PUBLISHED BY THE FLORIDA ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOL. 47, NO. 4 NOVEMBER 2019 PAGES 131-183 Florida Field Naturalist 47(4):131-143, 2019. A HISTORY OF COMMON EIDER (Somateria mollissima) OCCURRENCES AND HABITS IN NORTHEAST FLORIDA (NASSAU, DUVAL, AND ST. JOHNS COUNTIES) KEVIN E. DAILEY 6661 Beatrix Drive, Jacksonville, Florida 32226 Email: [email protected] Abstract.—The Common Eider (Somateria mollissima) is the most widely studied sea duck in North America, but most research on this species has focused on its breed- ing ecology, diet, and the effects of contaminants on mortality. Thus, there is an interest in and need to better understand the species’ range, habits, and demography outside of its breeding range. This article summarizes the twenty-six known individuals across twenty-one reported occurrences of Common Eider in northeast Florida dating back to 1970 and includes information about certain habits that corroborate known characteris- tics while challenging other existing understandings about the species. INTRODUCTION The Common Eider (Somateria mollissima) is the largest duck in the Northern Hemisphere, and four subspecies are recognized in North America. While it is the most widely studied sea duck in North America, the majority of studies are based on breeding ecology, diet, and the effects of contaminants on mortality. There is a clear interest in and need for better understanding of the species’ range, habits, and demography outside of its breeding range (Goudie et al. 2000). The four subspecies’ range and occurrence outside their respective breeding grounds are not entirely well understood, but it is assumed that Common Eiders reaching the state of Florida are of the “American” race, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Ecology of Great Black-Backed and Herring Gulls on Kent Island in the Bay of Fundy by Rolanda J Steenweg Submitted In
    Foraging Ecology of Great Black-backed and Herring Gulls on Kent Island in the Bay of Fundy By Rolanda J Steenweg Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honours Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science at: Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia April 2010 Supervisors: Dr. Robert Ronconi Dr. Marty Leonard ENVS 4902 Professor: Dr. Daniel Rainham TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 7 2.1 General biology and reproduction 7 2.2 Composition of adult and chick gull diets - changes over the breeding season8 2.3 General similarities and differences between gull species 9 2.4Predation on Common Eider Ducklings 10 2.5Techniques 10 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 13 3.1 Study site and species 13 3.2 Lab Methods 16 3.3 Data Analysis 17 4. RESULTS 18 4.1 Pellet and regurgitate samples 19 4.2 Stable isotope analysis 21 4.3 Estimates of diet 25 5. DISCUSSION 26 5.1 Main components of diet 26 5.2 Differences between species and age classes 28 5.3 Variability between breeding stages 30 5.4 Seasonal trends in diet 32 5.5 Discrepancy between plasma and red blood cell stable isotope signatures 32 6. CONCLUSION, LIMITATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 33 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 35 REFERENCES 36 2 ABSTRACT I studied the foraging ecology of the generalist predators Great Black-backed (Larusmarinus) and Herring (Larusargentatus) Gulls on Kent Island, in the Bay of Fundy. To study diet, I collected pellets casted in and around nests supplemented with tissue samples (red blood cells, plasma, head feathers and primary feathers) obtained from chicks and adults for stable isotope analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Part B: for Private and Commercial Use
    RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (PART B) §4-71-6.5 PART B: FOR PRIVATE AND COMMERCIAL USE SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Haplotaxida FAMILY Lumbricidae Lumbricus rubellus earthworm, red PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Amphipoda FAMILY Gammaridae Gammarus (all species in genus) crustacean, freshwater; scud FAMILY Hyalellidae Hyalella azteca shrimps, imps (amphipod) ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Sididae Diaphanosoma (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Cyclopoida FAMILY Cyclopidae Cyclops (all species in genus) copepod, freshwater ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Alpheidae Alpheus brevicristatus shrimp, Japan (pistol) FAMILY Palinuridae Panulirus gracilis lobster, green spiny Panulirus (all species in genus lobster, spiny except Panulirus argus, P. longipes femoristriga, P. pencillatus) FAMILY Pandalidae Pandalus platyceros shrimp, giant (prawn) FAMILY Penaeidae Penaeus indicus shrimp, penaeid 49 RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part B) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Penaeus californiensis shrimp, penaeid Penaeus japonicus shrimp, wheel (ginger) Penaeus monodon shrimp, jumbo tiger Penaeus orientalis (chinensis) shrimp, penaeid Penaeus plebjius shrimp, penaeid Penaeus schmitti shrimp, penaeid Penaeus semisulcatus shrimp, penaeid Penaeus setiferus shrimp, white Penaeus stylirostris shrimp, penaeid Penaeus vannamei shrimp, penaeid ORDER Isopoda FAMILY Asellidae Asellus (all species in genus) crustacean, freshwater ORDER Podocopina FAMILY Cyprididae Cypris (all species in genus) ostracod, freshwater CLASS Insecta
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2
    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Occurrence of Common Eider (Somateria Mollissima) in British Columbia
    The Status and Occurrence of Common Eider (Somateria mollissima) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Jamie Fenneman. Introduction and Distribution The Common Eider (Somateria mollissima) is one of the widest ranging of all eider species, and is the only one to regularly occur in temperate regions of the northern hemisphere (Goudie et al. 2000). All other eider species are largely confined to arctic and subarctic regions (Goudie et al. 2000). In North America, it breeds from south-coastal Alaska and throughout the Bering Sea, including the Aleutian Islands, east across the arctic coast of Alaska and Canada to Hudson Bay, Quebec, Labrador, Newfoundland, and the Maritime provinces (Goudie et al. 2000, Dunn and Alderfer 2011). It also breeds along the coast of the northeast United States, south to Massachusetts, as well as throughout most of the islands of the Canadian arctic, north to Ellesmere Island, and along the coasts of Greenland (Goudie et al. 2000, Dunn and Alderfer 2011). It retreats south in winter, with western arctic populations wintering in the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and south coastal Alaska and eastern populations wintering in Hudson Bay and along the Atlantic coast from Labrador south to North Carolina (Goudie et al. 2000, Sibley 2000). It is rare but regular on the Great Lakes, and casual inland in eastern and central North America during winter and migration (Mlodinow 1999). Outside of North America, the Common Eider also occurs in Iceland, along the coasts of northwest Europe: including the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Scandinavia, and in eastern Russia along the eastern Siberian coast, Bering Sea coast, and the Kamchatka Peninsula (Brazil 2009, Mullarney and Zetterstrom 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Ageing and Identification of Immature Males
    The Occurrence and Identification of King Eider in British Columbia. By Jamie Fenneman and Rick Toochin Photo 1: Flock of King Eiders containing 3 breeding-plumaged adult males, 1 presumed second-spring male (second male from the left), 1 first-spring male (front, centre), and 3 females. Compare this first- spring male to Photos 8, 9 & 10. The second-spring male is aged by its slightly reduced orange frontal shield, although this ageing is tentative without a more complete view of the bird. Note the overall dark rufous-tinged plumage, chevron-shaped barring and rounded head of females. Photographed in Norway on March 9, 2004 [Markus Varesvuo/ www.birdphoto.fi.]. Introduction: The first record of King Eider (Somateria spectabilis) for British Columbia was a male collected on October 18, 1938 in Hardy Bay, at the northern end of Vancouver Island (Table 1, item 1). Over the course of the next few decades, records of this beautiful northern sea duck slowly increased in coastal British Columbia and, indeed, down west coast of North America. Recent records have shown this species to be of somewhat regular occurrence along the coast of British Columbia, usually occurring in association with the large flocks of Surf (Melanitta perspicillata) and White- winged (M.fusca) Scoters that inhabit this region. Although the identification of full-plumaged males could hardly be described as difficult, identification of females, as well as correct ageing of immature males, may prove more difficult to observers unfamiliar with the species. Many males reported in British Columbia, even those suspected of being adult, may in fact be sub adult or near-adult (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS of MAINE an Analysis Of
    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS OF MAINE An Analysis of Avian Diversity and Abundance Compiled by: Susan Gallo, Thomas P. Hodgman, and Judy Camuso A Project Supported by the Maine Outdoor Heritage Fund IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS OF MAINE An Analysis of Avian Diversity and Abundance February 7, 2008 Compiled by: Susan Gallo, Maine Audubon, 20 Gilsland Farm Rd., Falmouth, ME 04105 Thomas P. Hodgman, Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 650 State St., Bangor, ME 04401 Judy Camuso, Maine Audubon, 20 Gilsland Farm Rd., Falmouth, ME 04105 (Present Address: Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 358 Shaker Road, Gray, ME 04039) Recommended citation: Gallo, S., T. P. Hodgman, and J. Camuso, Compilers. 2008. Important Bird Areas Of Maine: an analysis of avian diversity and abundance. Maine Audubon, Falmouth, Maine. 94pp. Cover Photo: Scarborough Marsh at sunrise, by W. G. Shriver ii Table of Contents History ..........................................................................................................................................1 What is an Important Bird Area?.......................................................................................1 Qualifying Criteria...................................................................................................................1 Data Use and Applicability Disclaimer .............................................................................2 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Behavior and Relationships of the Eiders
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Ornithology Papers in the Biological Sciences 3-1964 Comparative Behavior and Relationships of the Eiders Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Comparative Behavior and Relationships of the Eiders" (1964). Papers in Ornithology. 63. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology/63 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Ornithology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Johnsgard in Condor (March 1964) 66(2). Copyright 1964, University of California. Used by permission. Mar., 1964 113 COMPARATIVE BEHAVIOR AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE EIDERS By PAUL A. JOHNSGARD One of the more controversial systematic problems existing in the family Anatidae concerns the taxonomic rank and evolutionary relationships of the four speciesof eiders, which are currently considered by the American Ornithologists’ Union (1957) to com- prise three genera (Somateria, Lampronetta, and Polysticta) in the diving duck sub- family Aythyinae. In 1945, however, Delacour and Mayr included the eiders in a single genus (Somateria) within the sea duck tribe Mergini. At present, Delacour (1959) considers the eiders a separate tribe, Somateriini, distinct from the other sea ducks, and placed near the dabbling duck tribe Anatini. The erection of this new tribe, and his recognition of Polysticta as a monotypic genus for the Steller Eider, was apparently the result of Humphrey’s (MS, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare Assessment for Captive Anseriformes: a Guide for Practitioners and Animal Keepers
    animals Article Welfare Assessment for Captive Anseriformes: A Guide for Practitioners and Animal Keepers Paul Rose 1,2,* and Michelle O’Brien 2 1 Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Psychology, Washington Singer, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK 2 Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge Wetland Centre, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire GL2 7BT, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 May 2020; Accepted: 1 July 2020; Published: 3 July 2020 Simple Summary: Zoological collections are constantly working to find new ways of improving their standards of care for the animals they keep. Many species kept in zoos are also found in private animal collections. The knowledge gained from studying these zoo-housed populations can also benefit private animal keepers and their animals. Waterfowl (ducks, geese, and swans) are examples of species commonly kept in zoos, and in private establishments, that have received little attention when it comes to understanding their core needs in captivity. Measuring welfare (how the animal is coping with the environment that it is in) is one way of understanding whether a bird’s needs are being met by the care provided to it. This paper provides a method for measuring the welfare of waterfowl that can be applied to zoo-housed birds as well as to those in private facilities. The output of such a welfare measurement method can be used to show where animal care is good (and should be continued at a high standard) and to identify areas where animal care is not meeting the bird’s needs and hence should be altered or enhanced to be more suitable for the birds being kept.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2E - Revised Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment Hudson River Pcbs Reassessment
    PHASE 2 REPORT FURTHER SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS VOLUME 2E - REVISED BASELINE ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT HUDSON RIVER PCBS REASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2000 For U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Book 2 of 2 Tables, Figures and Plates TAMS Consultants, Inc. Menzie-Cura & Associates, Inc. PHASE 2 REPORT FURTHER SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS VOLUME 2E- REVISED BASELINE ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT HUDSON RIVER PCBs REASSESSMENT RI/FS CONTENTS Volume 2E (Book 1 of 2) Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................ i LIST OF TABLES ........................................................... xiii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................... xxv LIST OF PLATES .......................................................... xxvi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................1 1.1 Purpose of Report .................................................1 1.2 Site History ......................................................2 1.2.1 Summary of PCB Sources to the Upper and Lower Hudson River ......4 1.2.2 Summary of Phase 2 Geochemical Analyses .......................5 1.2.3 Extent of Contamination in the Upper Hudson River ................5 1.2.3.1 PCBs in Sediment .....................................5 1.2.3.2 PCBs in the Water Column ..............................6 1.2.3.3 PCBs in Fish .........................................7
    [Show full text]