DOCSLIB.ORG

Foraging Guilds of North American Birds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foraging Guilds of North American Birds RESEARCH Foraging Guilds of North American Birds RICHARD M. DE GRAAF ABSTRACT / We propose a foraging guild classification for USDA Forest Service North American inland, coastal, and pelagic birds. This classi- Northeastern Forest Experiment Station fication uses a three-part identification for each guild--major University of Massachusetts food, feeding substrate, and foraging technique--to classify Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA 672 species of birds in both the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. We have attempted to group species that use similar resources in similar ways. Researchers have identified forag- NANCY G. TILGHMAN ing guilds generally by examining species distributions along USDA Forest Service one or more defined environmental axes. Such studies fre- Northeastern Forest Experiment Station quently result in species with several guild designations. While Warren, Pennsylvania 16365, USA the continuance of these studies is important, to accurately describe species' functional roles, managers need methods to STANLEY H. ANDERSON consider many species simultaneously when trying to deter- USDI Fish and Wildlife Service mine the impacts of habitat alteration. Thus, we present an Wyoming Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit avian foraging classification as a starting point for further dis- University of Wyoming cussion to aid those faced with the task of describing commu- Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA nity effects of habitat change. Many approaches have been taken to describe bird Severinghaus's guilds were not all ba~cd on habitat feeding behavior. Comparisons between different studies, requirements, to question whether the indicator concept however, have been difficult because of differences in would be effective. terminology. We propose to establish a classification Thomas and others (1979) developed lists of species scheme for North American birds by using common by life form for each habitat and successional stage in the terminology based on major food type, substrate, and Blue Mountains of Oregon. This is a use of the guild technique, using foraging guilds. concept in which assemblages of species are defined The guild concept was originally proposed by Root according to common nesting and feeding requirements. (1967) to indicate a group of species that exploit the same Another use of the guild concept was made by Short and class of environmental resources in a similar way. For Burnham (1982), who grouped species into layers of each example, Root defined a foliage-gleaning guild in oak habitat. For example, forest species are associated with woodlands as a group of birds whose diet consisted of subsurface, ground surface, and shrub layer. arthropods obtained from the foliage zone of oaks. Root Verner (1984) defines management guilds as groups pointed out that birds could be a member of several of species that respond in a similar way to a variety of guilds. Thus, seasonal changes that occur in avian feed- changes likely to affect their environment. He states that ing habitats could be accommodated. The guild concept all bird species that depend on tree canopies for their food has become a useful tool in looking at competition, niche supply--whether fruit, buds, leaves, or insects--could be separation, and functional relationships within the com- in one management guild. This would give the manager munity. As a result, biologists can use the guild concept to some idea of the group of species that are affected by show how different taxa interrelate and how impacts of habitat change. Verner's use of management guilds does habitat change influence community dynamics and not not fully consider the functional role originally proposed just individual species. by Root; rather, it considers responses to changes in The guild concept has been used by a number of identifiable zones of forest habitats. authors to compare or classify components of a commu- Standardization of guilds provides a means by which nity. It is possible to establish guilds on the bases of resource managers can compare communities of birds. different criteria. Landres (1983) reviews some efforts to The number of community components are reduced, assign species to guilds. Guilds were used by Severing- thereby facilitating the description. Likewise, biologists haus (1981) to develop the idea of indicator species; he can discuss competition and energy flow using common believed that since all members use the same resource, all terminology (Landres 1984). should respond similarly to changes in their environ- Guilds can be combined in different ways for different ment. There are enough exceptions, in part because purposes. Basically, however, we need to develop bases Environmental Management Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 493-536 1985 Springer-Vedag New York Inc. 494 R.M. DeGraaf and others for classifying each species into a guild. In this article, we tion seasonally, which may require the use of different have considered food, substrate from which the food was substrates or techniques. We indicate such changes in obtained, and technique used in obtaining the food as the columns labeled as breeding period or nonbreeding peri- common ground to classify 672 species of North Ameri- od. We do not indicate gender- or age-specific differences can birds. These three criteria were selected because they in foraging guilds unless they appear vastly different and can be observed or documented for each species. The would affect the management of the species. components of major food, substrate on which food was The species in this list include all those that can be found, and techniques used to obtain food Provide realis- found in North America during the breeding season or tic groupings of species. The user of this information can nonbreeding season. The geographic range covered by group the species in one of the guilds presently described this list is from Greenland to Florida to California to or utilize different criteria to develop the grouping. With Alaska. Birds of Mexico and the Caribbean are not this classification, based on avian feeding behavior, users included unless they are regularly found north of these could compare the results of different studies for func- areas at the specified season. Accidental species are not tional differences. included. The Check-list of North American Birds, 6th Our description of guilds brings the concept as pro, edn. (American Ornithologists' Union, 1983) was used to posed by Root (1967) into use by resource managers. determine the status of these birds. Despite the different integrations and use of concept, it is now possible to have a ,dictionary" of terms characteris- tic of each species. While debates can continue about the Classification Procedures concept, our classification provides a reference point for application. For food type, we did not necessarily include all foods Birds' names are from the American Ornithologists' taken by each species--only the major food items (20% of Union (1983); scientific names are listed in the Appen- diet during a given period). dix. The major references u.'sed to develop this foraging Carnivore: vertebrates guild classification included A. C. Bent's Life History of Crustaceovore: crustaceans North American Birds series (Smithsonian Institute, US Frugivore: fruits National Museum Bulletins, Washington, DC); Hand- Granivore: nuts book of North American Birds,' edited by Ralph S. Herbivore: plants (leaves, stems, roots) Palmer (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1962); Insectivore: insects Waterfowl of North America, by Paul A. Johnsgard Moltuscovore: mollusks (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1975); Ducks, Omnivore: a variety of foods including both animal Geese 6" Swans of North America, by Frank C, Bellrose and plant foods (the less common food group makes (Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA, 1976); American up 10% of diet) Wildlife 4r Plants, by Alexander C. Martin and others Piscivore: fish (Dover Publications, New York, 1951); Crows of the Vermivore: sandworms, earthworms, etc. World, by Derek Goodwin (Corneil University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1976); Audubon Water Bird Guide and Substrate refers to the place where a food item is found or Audubon Land Bird Guide by Richard H. Pough (Dou- taken. bleday & Co., Garden City, NY, 1946)i Management Of air: caught in the air Migratory Shore and Upland Game Birds in North bark: on, in, or under bark of trees America, edited by Glen C. Sanderson (International coastal: waters along coast (can include brackish as Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Washington, well as salt water) DC, 1977). coastal beach: beaches and/or tidal flats along coast coastal bottom: floor of continental shelf along coast coastal rock: rocks along coast Foraging Guild Designation coastal surface: surface of coastal waters Often it was difficult to limit this classification to a floral: on or in flowers single guild per species, so in several eases we have listed fresh marsh: freshwater marshes (on mud, in shallow more than one guild. An additional guild was designated water, or on marsh plants) when a second food item represented at least 20% of the freshwater: freshwater habitats (ponds, lakes, rivers, diet of a species or when the specie s spent at least 20% of streams) its time feeding on a different substrate or using a freshwater bottom: bottoms of freshwater ponds and different technique. Some species shift their food Selec- lakes Foraging Guilds of North American Birds 495 freshwater shoreline: shores of freshwater ponds, hover-gleaner: hovers in air while selecting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TREND NOTE Number 021, October 2012
    SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE TREND NOTE Number 021, October 2012 SEABIRDS IN SCOTLAND Prepared by Simon Foster and Sue Marrs of SNH Knowledge Information Management Unit using results from the Seabird Monitoring Programme and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee Scotland has internationally important populations of several seabirds. Their conservation is assisted through a network of designated sites. Figure 1 shows the distribution of the 50 Special Protection Areas (SPA) which have seabirds listed as a feature of interest. The map shows the widespread nature of the sites and the predominance of important seabird areas on the Northern Isles (Orkney and Shetland), where some of our largest seabird colonies are present. The most recent estimate of seabird populations was obtained from Birds of Scotland (Forrester et al., 2007). Table 1 shows the population levels for all seabirds regularly breeding in Scotland. Table 1: Population Estimates for Breeding Seabirds in Scotland. Figure 1: Special Protection Areas for Seabirds Breeding in Scotland. Species* Unit** Estimate Key Points Northern fulmar 486,000 AOS Manx shearwater 126,545 AOS Trends are described for 11 of the 24 European storm-petrel 31,570+ AOS species of seabirds breeding in Leach’s storm-petrel 48,057 AOS Scotland Northern gannet 182,511 AOS Great cormorant c. 3,600 AON Nine have shown sustained declines European shag 21,500-30,000 PAIRS over the past 20 years. Two have Arctic skua 2,100 AOT remained stable. Great skua 9,650 AOT The reasons for the declines are Black headed
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin Initiative Action Plan for the Coastal Biodiversity of Anegada, British Virgin Islands
    Darwin Initiative Action Plan for the Coastal Biodiversity of Anegada, British Virgin Islands Darwin Anegada BAP 2006 Page We dedicate this document to the people of Anegada; the stewards of Anegada’s biodiversity and to Raymond Walker of the BVI National Parks Trust who tragically died after a very short illness during the course of this project. This report should be cited as: McGowan A., A.C.Broderick, C.Clubbe, S.Gore, B.J.Godley, M.Hamilton, B.Lettsome, J.Smith-Abbott, N.K.Woodfield. 2006. Darwin Initiative Action Plan for the Coastal Biodiversity of Anegada, British Virgin Islands. 13 pp. Available online at: http://www.seaturtle.org/mtrg/projects/anegada/ Darwin Anegada BAP 2006 Page 2 1. Introduction It well known that Anegada has globally important biodiversity. Indeed, biodiversity is the basis for most livelihoods; supporting fisheries and leading to the attractiveness that is such a draw to visitors. Over the last three years (2003-2006), a project was undertaken on Anegada with a wide range of activities focussing towards this Biodiversity Action Plan. From the outset it was known that the island hosts a globally important coral reef system, regionally significant populations of marine turtles, is of regional importance to birds and supports globally important endemic plants. The project arose following the encouragement of Anegada community members and subsequent extensive consultation between Dr. Godley (University of Exeter) and heads of BVI Conservation and Fisheries Department (CFD) and BVI National Parks Trust (NPT) who requested that funding be sourced for a project which: 1. Allowed the coastal biodiversity of Anegada to be assessed; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • CATALINA CALIFORNIA QUAIL (Callipepla Californica Catalinensis) Paul W
    II SPECIES ACCOUNTS Andy Birch PDF of Catalina California Quail account from: Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. California Bird Species of Special Concern CATALINA CALIFORNIA QUAIL (Callipepla californica catalinensis) Paul W. Collins Criteria Scores Population Trend 0 Santa Range Trend 0 Barbara County Population Size 7.5 Range Size 10 Ventura Endemism 10 County Population Concentration 10 Threats 0 Los San Miguel Is. Santa Cruz Is. Angeles County Anacapa Is. Santa Rosa Is. Santa Barbara Is. Santa Catalina Is. San Nicolas Is. San Clemente Is. Current Year-round Range Historic Year-round Range County Boundaries Kilometers 20 10 0 20 Current and historic (ca. 1944) year-round range of the Catalina California Quail. Birds from Santa Catalina Island (perhaps brought by Native Americans) later introduced successfully to Santa Rosa (1935–1940) and Santa Cruz (late 1940s) islands, but unsuccessfully to San Nicolas Island (1962); quail from mainland populations of C. c. californica introduced unsuccessfully to Santa Cruz (prior to 1875) and San Clemente (late 19th century, 1913) islands. Catalina California Quail Studies of Western Birds 1:107–111, 2008 107 Studies of Western Birds No. 1 SPECIAL CONCERN PRIORITY HISTORIC RANGE AND ABUNDANCE Currently considered a Bird Species of Special IN CALIFORNIA Concern (year round), priority 3. This subspecies Grinnell and Miller (1944) described the Catalina was not included on prior special concern lists California Quail as a “common to abundant” (Remsen 1978, CDFG 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • 111 Historical Notes on Whooping Cranes at White
    HISTORICAL NOTES ON WHOOPING CRANES AT WHITE LAKE, LOUISIANA: THE JOHN J. LYNCH INTERVIEWS, 1947-1948 GAY M. GOMEZ, Department of Social Sciences, McNeese State University, Box 92335, Lake Charles, LA 70609, USA RODERICK C. DREWIEN, Hornocker Wildlife Institute, University of Idaho, 3346 E 200 N, Rigby, ID 83442, USA MARY LYNCH COURVILLE, John J. Lynch American Natural Heritage Park, 1393 Henderson Highway, Breaux Bridge, LA 70517, USA Abstract: In May 1939 biologist John J. Lynch of the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey conducted an aerial survey that documented the existence of a non-migratory population of whooping cranes (Grus americana) near White Lake in southwest Louisiana. Lynch found 13 cranes, including 2 pre-fledged young, confirming breeding. Lynch’s survey occurred, in part, because fur trappers and alligator hunters working in the White Lake marshes had informed the biologist of the cranes’ presence and habits. Lynch con- tinued his contacts with these knowledgeable marsh users, and in 1947 and 1948 interviewed at least 7 individuals. In 2001, M. L. Courville, along with her sister Nora Z. Lynch, discovered the interview notes among their father’s papers. The notes contain information on the Louisiana non-migratory population’s range, abundance, habitat use, feeding behavior, nesting, and young, including survival of twins; they also include a small amount of information on sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) and migratory whooping cranes. Both Lynch and Robert P. Allen relied heavily on this “traditional ecological knowledge” in their accounts of non-migratory whooping cranes in southwest Louisiana. Because of their biological and historical significance, the interview notes are reproduced in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the Mendocino National Forest Compiled by Chuck Vaughn, Jerry White, and David Woodward Updated June 2007
    Birds of the Mendocino National Forest compiled by Chuck Vaughn, Jerry White, and David Woodward updated June 2007 (R) Resident; (SV) Summer Visitor; (WV) Winter Visitor; (T) Transient, (M) Migrant Common Name Scientific Name Snow Goose Chen caerulescens (M) Mallard Anas platyrhynchos (R) Wood Duck Aix sponsa (R) Common Merganser Mergus merganser (R) Sooty Grouse Dendragapus fuliginosus (R) Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopavo (R and SV) Mountain Quail Oreortyx pictus (R) California Quail Callipepla californica (R) Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura (R and SV) Osprey Pandion haliaetus (SV) Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus (WV) Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus (SV and WV) Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus (R and WV) Cooper's Hawk Accipiter cooperii (R and WV) Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis (R) Swainson's Hawk Buteo swainsoni (T) Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis (R) Rough-legged Hawk Buteo lagopus (WV) Golden Eagle Aguila chrysaetos (R) American Kestrel Falco sparverius (R) Merlin Falco columbarius (WV) Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus (R) Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus (WV) Killdeer Charadrius vociferous (R) Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularia (R and SV) Band-tailed Pigeon Columba fasciata (R and WV) Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura (R and SV) Greater Roadrunner Geococcyx californianus (R) Barn Owl Tyto alba (R) Flammulated Owl Otus flammeolus (SV) Western Screech-Owl Otus kennicottii (R) Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus (R) Northern Pygmy-Owl Glaucidium gnoma (R) Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis (R) Long-eared Owl Asio otus (SV) Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Masked Bobwhite (Colinus Virginianus Ridgwayi) 5-Year Review
    Masked Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgwayi) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photograph by Paul Zimmerman U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge Sasabe, AZ March 2014 5-YEAR REVIEW Masked Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgwayi) 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers Lead Regional Office Southwest Region, Region 2, Albuquerque, NM Susan Jacobsen, Chief, Division of Classification and Restoration, 505-248-6641 Wendy Brown, Chief, Branch of Recovery and Restoration, 505-248-6664 Jennifer Smith-Castro, Recovery Biologist, 505-248-6663 Lead Field Office: Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge (BANWR) Sally Gall, Refuge Manager, 520-823-4251 x 102 Juliette Fernandez, Assistant Refuge Manager, 520-823-4251 x 103 Dan Cohan, Wildlife Biologist, 520-823-4351 x 105 Mary Hunnicutt, Wildlife Biologist, 520-823-4251 Cooperating Field Office(s): Arizona Ecological Services Tucson Field Office Jean Calhoun, Assistant Field Supervisor, 520-670-6150 x 223 Mima Falk, Senior Listing Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 225 Scott Richardson, Supervisory Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 242 Mark Crites, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 229 Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor, 602-242-0210 x 244 1.2 Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review).
    [Show full text]
  • Chihuahuan Raven)
    REGION 2 SENSITIVE SPECIES EVALUATION FORM Species: (Corvus cryptoleucus/Chihuahuan Raven) Criteria Rank Rationale Literature Citations • Andrews & Righter 1 A High. The Chihuahuan Raven is limited in breeding distribution to the great plains of southeastern Colorado • Kingery Distribution and extreme southwestern Kansas. • Busby & Zimmerman within R2 • Ehrlich et al. 2 C High. This species breeds from southeastern Colorado, south through western Texas, southern Arizona • National Geographic Society Distribution and New Mexico to southern Mexico. outside R2 • Andrews & Righter 3 C High. Population expansions and contractions have been documented over the past 150 years. This • Busby & Zimmerman Dispersal species is relatively mobile. They tend to move in roving flocks after the nesting season. • Kingery Capability • Andrews & Righter 4 A High. Small, relatively isolated populations are confined primarily to southeastern Colorado and • Carter et al. Abundance in southwestern Kansas. In southwestern Kansas only 12 known nest sites have been located and several of • Busby & Zimmerman R2 those are on or near the Cimarron National Grasslands. A significant percentage of the population in Colorado occurs on the Comanche National Grasslands. • Carter et al. 5 A Low. The breeding bird survey shows nearly an eight percent decline from 1966 to 1999. However the • Kingery Population amount of data is seriously lacking to provide accurate projections. One report observed a decline of 10 • Breeding Bird Survey Trend in R2 active nests in a colony to only one active nest in Colorado from 1990 to 1995. The Partners In Flight analysis shows a moderate decline for this species in R2. • Carter et al. 6 C High.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Ecology and Extinction of the Great Auk (Pinguinus Impennis): Anecdotal Evidence and Conjectures
    THE AUK A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY VOL. 101 JANUARY1984 No. 1 BREEDING ECOLOGY AND EXTINCTION OF THE GREAT AUK (PINGUINUS IMPENNIS): ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE AND CONJECTURES SVEN-AXEL BENGTSON Museumof Zoology,University of Lund,Helgonavi•en 3, S-223 62 Lund,Sweden The Garefowl, or Great Auk (Pinguinusimpen- Thus, the sad history of this grand, flightless nis)(Frontispiece), met its final fate in 1844 (or auk has received considerable attention and has shortly thereafter), before anyone versed in often been told. Still, the final episodeof the natural history had endeavoured to study the epilogue deservesto be repeated.Probably al- living bird in the field. In fact, no naturalist ready before the beginning of the 19th centu- ever reported having met with a Great Auk in ry, the GreatAuk wasgone on the westernside its natural environment, although specimens of the Atlantic, and in Europe it was on the were occasionallykept in captivity for short verge of extinction. The last few pairs were periods of time. For instance, the Danish nat- known to breed on some isolated skerries and uralist Ole Worm (Worm 1655) obtained a live rocks off the southwesternpeninsula of Ice- bird from the Faroe Islands and observed it for land. One day between 2 and 5 June 1844, a several months, and Fleming (1824) had the party of Icelanderslanded on Eldey, a stackof opportunity to study a Great Auk that had been volcanic tuff with precipitouscliffs and a flat caught on the island of St. Kilda, Outer Heb- top, now harbouring one of the largestsgan- rides, in 1821. nettles in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Landbird Monitoring Protocol and Standard Operating
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Landbird Monitoring Protocol and Standard Operating Procedures for the Chihuahuan Desert, Northern Great Plains, Sonoran Desert, and Southern Plains Networks Version 1.00 Natural Resource Report NPS/SOPN/NRR—2013/729 ON THE COVER Upper left: Western Meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta)1, one of the most common species for SOPN. Upper right: Black-throated Sparrow (Amphispiza bilineata)2, one of the most common species for CHDN. Lower left: Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum)3, one of the most common species for NGPN. Lower right: Gila Woodpecker (Melanerpes uropygialis)2, one of the most common species for SODN. 1Photo © John and Karen Hollingsworth 2Photo © Robert Shantz 3Photographer Dan Licht - NPS. Landbird Monitoring Protocol and Standard Operating Procedures for the Chihuahuan Desert, Northern Great Plains, Sonoran Desert, and Southern Plains Networks Version 1.00 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SOPN/NRTR—2013/729 Authors (listed alphabetically) 4National Park Service Kristen Beaupré1 Chihuahuan Desert Network Robert E. Bennetts2 New Mexico State University Jennifer A. Blakesley3 3655 Research Dr., Genesis Building D Kirsten Gallo4 Las Cruces, NM 88003 David Hanni3 Andy Hubbard1 5USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Ross Lock3 Sonoran Desert Research Station Brian F. Powell5 School of Natural Resources Heidi Sosinski2 University of Arizona Patricia Valentine-Darby6 Tucson, Arizona 85721 Chris White3 Marcia Wilson7 6University of West Florida Department of Biology 11000 University Parkway 1National Park Service Pensacola, Florida 32514 Sonoran Desert Network 7660 E. Broadway Blvd., Suite #303 7National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85710 Northern Great Plains Network 231 East St.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • King Eiders Mated with Common Eiders in Iceland
    KING EIDERS MATED WITH COMMON EIDERS IN ICELAND BY OLIN SEWALL PETTINGILL, JR. HE Common Eider (Somateriu mollissima) is one of Icelands’ most T abundant birds, with an estimated breeding population of a half million individuals (see Pettingill, 1959). Th e majority nest in colonies whose sizes range from a few pairs to many hundreds. From May 24 to 27, 1958, it was my good fortune to study and film one of the largest colonies (5,000 nests), situated on the farm of Gisli Vagnsson, along the DyrafjSrdur in Northwest Iceland. Egg-laying at this time was virtually completed, with incubation just getting under way. In my earlier paper (op. cit.) I have described the colony and pointed out that the males were present, each one stationed close to a nest while his mate sat on it. Many nests were near together-in a few cases as close as two feet, with the result that there was marked hostility among the guarding males. Presumably the males departed from the colony after the first ten days of incubation as they did on the Inner Farne (Tinbergen, 1958)) an island off the northeast coast of England. Before I visited the Vagnsson colony, Dr. Finnur Gudmundsson, Curator in the Natural History Museum at Reykjavik, told me that I should expect to find from one to several male King Eiders (S. spectabilis) mated with female Common Eiders. He had noted many mixed pairs himself in various Iceland colonies and once published an account of his observations (Gudmundsson, 1932:96-97). He went on to say that such matings are of “frequent occur- rence” in Iceland and have been known about since the 18th Century.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Behavior and Habitat Selection of Insectivorous Migratory Songbirds at Gulf Coast Stopover Sites in Spring
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1996 Foraging Behavior and Habitat Selection of Insectivorous Migratory Songbirds at Gulf Coast Stopover Sites in Spring. Chao-chieh Chen Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Chen, Chao-chieh, "Foraging Behavior and Habitat Selection of Insectivorous Migratory Songbirds at Gulf Coast Stopover Sites in Spring." (1996). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6323. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6323 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]