DOCSLIB.ORG

Geomechanical Assessment of the Cincinnati Group As a Caprock

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geomechanical Assessment of the Cincinnati Group As a Caprock Geomechanical Assessment of the Cincinnati Group as a Caprock Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University Matthew R. Hawrylak, B.S. Graduate Program in Earth Sciences 2013 Thesis committee Dr. Jeffrey Daniels, adviser Dr. Ann Cook Dr. E. Scott Bair i Copyright by Matthew R. Hawrylak 2013 ii Abstract In this study, the Cincinnati Group, was investigated for its potential as a confining layer (caprock.) The Cincinnati Group is a thick layer of late–Ordovician calcareous shale that directly overlies the Utica/Point Pleasant throughout the Appalachian Basin as a potential seal for fluid injection and CO2 sequestration. The Cincinnati Group was deposited in a shallow sea environment in Late–Ordovician Laurentia in multiple transgressive–to–regressive sequences. The viability of the Cincinnati Group as a caprock was studied using petrophysical and geomechanical methods, including well log analysis and laboratory evaluation of lithology, permeability, and tensile strength. Core samples of the Cincinnati Group were taken from the Aristech Well in Scioto County. Logs were obtained from many locations across the state of Ohio. I use permeability and Poisson’s ratio measurements from the core, and traveltime, density, and porosity data from logs to calculate both multiphase fluid flow times and fracture initiation pressures for the Cincinnati Group at the location of each well log. I compare results to mineralogical data obtained via energy dispersive x–ray spectroscopy, which demonstrates that increasing shale content decreases permeability and increases fracture resistance. ii At the location in Scioto County, the intrinsic permeabilities of core samples from a well were measured to be in the range of 0.001 to 0.705 mD, with an average value of 0.111 mD. These values resulted in calculated migration times of 3,700 years and 900 years for water and CO2–water mixture through the entire Cincinnati Group, which has a thickness of 795 at this location. Fracture gradient calculations predict an injection pressure of at least 0.81 psi per foot is required to induce a fracture at the base of the Cincinnati Group rocks. Individual fluid migration time (0.215 feet/year at Scioto County site) and the prediction of the formation of fractures from each location were compared to values from similar studies in the literature and from communications with current operators in the Utica/Point Pleasant of Ohio for context. It was found that lower– bound calculations predict the physical characteristics of the Cincinnati Group are those of an excellent caprock capable of containing water injected under pressure, but the Cincinnati Group requires further investigation to determine its potential for CO2 sequestration. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisers, Jeff Daniels, Ann Cook, and E. Scott Bair. This research was made possible through funding from the Ohio Coal Development Office and the U.S. Department of Energy. I would also like to thank Julie Sheets, Sue Welch, Alex Swift, Mike Murphy, Kyle Shalek, Tingting Liu, and Nick Leeper of OSU Earth Sciences; Chris Perry, Jim McDonald, Joe Wells , Mark Baronoski, Ron Riley, and Greg Schumacher of the Ohio Geological Survey; and Brian Mott of DLZ Engineering. iv Vita May 2007……………………………………..………………St. Edward College Preparatory High School May 2011…………………………….........................……..B.S., Geology, The Ohio State University September 2011...........Graduate Research Associate, Geology, The Ohio State University June 2012.....................Intern, the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center January 2013................Graduate Teaching Associate, Geology, The Ohio State University April 2013.............Distinguished Teaching Award, The Ohio State School of Earth Science June 2013...............Intern, Chevron North America Exploration and Production Company December 2013...................................................M.S., Geology, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: Earth Sciences v Table of Contents Abstract ..............................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgments..............................................................................................................iv Vita .....................................................................................................................................v List of Tables .....................................................................................................................vii List of Figures ...................................................................................................................viii Chapter 1: Introduction…………………...................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Geologic Setting…………………………………………………............................................6 Chapter 3: Methods……………………………………………………………………………………………………..12 Chapter 4: Results and Discussion………………………………………………………………………………..19 Chapter 5: Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………………………28 References .......................................................................................................................31 Appendix A: Cincinnati Group Picks from Gamma Ray Logs………………………………………….36 Appendix B: Laboratory Measurements…………………………………………..…………………………..48 Appendix C: Scioto County Fracture Gradient Calculations..………………………………………...53 Appendix D: Belmont County Fracture Gradient Calculations ……………………………………...60 Appendix E: Gallia County Fracture Gradient Calculations ……………………………………….....69 vi List of Tables Table 1: Cincinnati Group Fluid Migration Times………………………………………………………….23 vii List of Figures Figure 1: Generalized stratigraphic column for east–central Ohio....………………………….....2 Figure 2: Sites used in this study.……......................………………………………………...................3 Figure 3: Map of horizontal Utica wells in Ohio ………………………........................................4 Figure 4: Paleogeographic map of Laurentia during the late Ordovician...........................7 Figure 5: Generalized stratigraphic column of Ohio……………………………………………............8 Figure 6: Relation between shale acoustic parameter and reservoir fluid pressure gradient…………………………………………….……………………………………………................16 Figure 7: Allen County well gamma ray curve…………………………………………….…………………37 Figure 8: Ashtabula County well gamma ray curve……………………………………………............38 Figure 9: Belmont County well gamma ray curve……………………………………………..............39 Figure 10: Columbiana County well gamma ray curve…………………………………………….......40 Figure 11: Fairfield County well gamma ray curve…………………………………………….............41 Figure 12: Gallia County well gamma ray curve…………………………………………….................42 Figure 13: Henry County well gamma ray curve……………………………………………................43 Figure 14: Marion County well gamma ray curve……………………………………………..............44 Figure 15: Medina County well gamma ray curve……………………………………………..............45 Figure 16: Sandusky County well gamma ray curve……………………………………………...........46 Figure 17: Scioto County well gamma ray curve……………………………………………................47 Figure 18: Warren County well gamma ray curve……………………………………………..............48 Figure 19: Scioto County Intrinsic Permeability Measurements………………………………......50 Figure 20: Scioto County SEM/QEMSCAN Results……………………………………………..............51 viii Figure 21: Scioto County AR2–15 unconfined compression test……………………………….....52 Figure 22: Scioto County AR2–16 unconfined compression test……………………………........53 Figure 23: Scioto County P–wave curve: compressional trend and deviation………….......55 Figure 24: Scioto County density log………………………………………………………………...............56 Figure 25: Scioto County reservoir fluid pressure gradient……………………………….............57 Figure 26: Scioto County reservoir fluid pressure………………………………………………………...58 Figure 27: Scioto County fracture gradient……………………………………………………………….....59 Figure 28: Scioto County fracturing pressure………………………………………………………………..60 Figure 29: Belmont County dipole sonic logs………………………………………………………………..62 Figure 30: Belmont County P–wave curve: compressional trend and deviation……………63 Figure 31: Belmont County density log………………………………………………………………...........64 Figure 32: Belmont County reservoir fluid pressure gradient………………………………..........65 Figure 33: Belmont County reservoir fluid pressure………………………………………………….....66 Figure 34: Belmont County Poisson’s ratio……………………………………………………………….....67 Figure 35: Belmont County fracture gradient……………………………………………………………….68 Figure 36: Belmont County fracturing pressure…………………………………………………………...69 Figure 37: Gallia County dipole sonic logs……………………………………………………………….......71 Figure 38: Gallia County P–wave curve: compressional trend and deviation...................72 Figure 39: Gallia County reservoir fluid pressure………………………………………………………....73 Figure 40: Gallia County reservoir fluid pressure gradient………………………………..............74 Figure 41: Gallia County density log………………………………………………………………................75 Figure 42: Gallia County Poisson’s ratio………………………………………………………………..........76 Figure 43: Gallia County fracture gradient………………………………………………………………......77 Figure 44: Gallia County fracturing pressure ………………………………………………………………..78 ix Chapter 1: Introduction Fluids are currently being injected into deep formations for the purposes of the production of hydrocarbons and the storage and sequestration of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Eifelian Givetian Boundary (Middle Devonian) at Tsakhir, Govi Altai Region, Southern Mongolia
    23rd Annual Keck Symposium: 2010 Houston, Texas THE EIFELIAN GIVETIAN BOUNDARY (MIDDLE DEVONIAN) AT TSAKHIR, GOVI ALTAI REGION, SOUTHERN MONGOLIA NICHOLAS SULLIVAN State University of New York at Geneseo Faculty Advisor: D. Jeffrey Over INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE GEOLOGIC SETTING The Devonian System (418.1±3.0 – 365.7±2.7 Ma) Badarch et al. (2002) argued that Mongolia consists is subdivided into three epochs, Lower, Middle, and of numerous terranes that were accreted onto small Upper, which are further subdivided into seven stag- Precambrian cratonic blocks in the Hangay Region es. The Middle Devonian is subdivided into the Eif- during the Paleozoic and Mesozoic. The focus of elian (391.9±3.4 – 388.1±2.6 Ma) and the Givetian this investigation are strata in a region recognized (388.1±2.6 - 383.7±3.1 Ma; Kaufmann, 2006). The as part of one of these accretionary wedges, which stage boundary is defined by the first appearance is referred to as the Gobi Altai Terrane (Figure 1; Ba- of Polygnathus hemiansatus at the Eifelian-Givetian darch et al., 2002; Minjin and Soja, 2009a). Badarch Stage Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP), et al. (2002) characterized the Gobi Altai Terrane as which is a section at Jebel Mech Irdane in the Tifilalt a backarc basin, as evidenced by abundant volcano- of Morocco (Walliser et al. 1995). At some sections, clastic sedimentary rocks. The volcanics within the the appearance of the goniatite Maenioceras undu- Gobi Altai Terrane are believed to be derived from latum has been used as a proxy for the boundary a prehistoric island arc represented by the Mandalo- (Kutcher and Schmidt, 1958).
    [Show full text]
  • The Classic Upper Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Eastern Cincinnati Arch
    International Geoscience Programme Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett – Kyle R. Hartshorn – Allison L. Young – Cameron E. Schwalbach – Alycia L. Stigall International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - 2018 - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Kyle R. Hartshorn Dry Dredgers, 6473 Jayfield Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, USA ([email protected]) Allison L. Young Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Cameron E. Schwalbach 1099 Clough Pike, Batavia, OH 45103, USA ([email protected]) Alycia L. Stigall Department of Geological Sciences and OHIO Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger Lab, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA ([email protected]) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We extend our thanks to the many colleagues and students who have aided us in our field work, discussions, and publications, including Chris Aucoin, Ben Dattilo, Brad Deline, Rebecca Freeman, Steve Holland, T.J. Malgieri, Pat McLaughlin, Charles Mitchell, Tim Paton, Alex Ries, Tom Schramm, and James Thomka. No less gratitude goes to the many local collectors, amateurs in name only: Jack Kallmeyer, Tom Bantel, Don Bissett, Dan Cooper, Stephen Felton, Ron Fine, Rich Fuchs, Bill Heimbrock, Jerry Rush, and dozens of other Dry Dredgers. We are also grateful to David Meyer and Arnie Miller for insightful discussions of the Cincinnatian, and to Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Conodont Biostratigraphy of the Bakken and Lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota Timothy P
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects 1986 Conodont biostratigraphy of the Bakken and lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota Timothy P. Huber University of North Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Huber, Timothy P., "Conodont biostratigraphy of the Bakken and lower Lodgepole Formations (Devonian and Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota" (1986). Theses and Dissertations. 145. https://commons.und.edu/theses/145 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE BAKKEN AND LOWER LODGEPOLE FORMATIONS (DEVONIAN AND MISSISSIPPIAN), WILLISTON BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA by Timothy P, Huber Bachelor of Arts, University of Minnesota - Morris, 1983 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota December 1986 This thesis submitted by Timothy P. Huber in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science from the University of North Dakota has been read by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whom the work has been done, and is hereby approved. This thesis meets the standards for appearance and conforms to the style and format requirements of the Graduate School at the University of North Dakota and is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennessee Meteorite Impact Sites and Changing Perspectives on Impact Cratering
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND THE TENNESSEE METEORITE IMPACT SITES AND CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT CRATERING A dissertation submitted by Janaruth Harling Ford B.A. Cum Laude (Vanderbilt University), M. Astron. (University of Western Sydney) For the award of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 ABSTRACT Terrestrial impact structures offer astronomers and geologists opportunities to study the impact cratering process. Tennessee has four structures of interest. Information gained over the last century and a half concerning these sites is scattered throughout astronomical, geological and other specialized scientific journals, books, and literature, some of which are elusive. Gathering and compiling this widely- spread information into one historical document benefits the scientific community in general. The Wells Creek Structure is a proven impact site, and has been referred to as the ‘syntype’ cryptoexplosion structure for the United State. It was the first impact structure in the United States in which shatter cones were identified and was probably the subject of the first detailed geological report on a cryptoexplosive structure in the United States. The Wells Creek Structure displays bilateral symmetry, and three smaller ‘craters’ lie to the north of the main Wells Creek structure along its axis of symmetry. The question remains as to whether or not these structures have a common origin with the Wells Creek structure. The Flynn Creek Structure, another proven impact site, was first mentioned as a site of disturbance in Safford’s 1869 report on the geology of Tennessee. It has been noted as the terrestrial feature that bears the closest resemblance to a typical lunar crater, even though it is the probable result of a shallow marine impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey
    Changes in Stratigraphic Nomenclature by the U.S. Geological Survey, By GEORGE V. COHEE, ROBERT G. BATES, and WILNA B. WRIGHT CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1294-A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 35 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Listing of nomenclatural changes- --- ----- - - ---- -- -- -- ------ --- Ortega Quartzite and the Big Rock and Jawbone Conglomerate Members of the Kiawa Mountain Formation, Tusas Mountains, New Mexico, by Fred Barker---------------------------------------------------- Reasons for abandonment of the Portage Group, by Wallace de Witt, Jr-- Tlevak Basalt, west coast of Prince of Wales Island, southeastern Alaska, by G. Donald Eberlein and Michael Churkin, Jr Formations of the Bisbee Group, Empire Mountains quadrangle, Pima County, Arizona, by Tommy L. Finnell---------------------------- Glance Conglomerate- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Willow Canyon Formation ....................................... Apache Canyon Formation-- ................................... Shellenberger Canyon Formation- - --__----- ---- -- -- -- ----------- Turney Ranch Formation---- ------- ------ -- -- -- ---- ------ ----- Age--_------------------------------------------------------- Pantano Formation, by Tommy L. Finnell----------_-----------------
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Stability Resulting from Rapid Flood Recession Along the Licking River, Kentucky
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________ I, _________________________________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: in: It is entitled: This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________ BANK INSTABILITY RESULTING FROM RAPID FLOOD RECESSION ALONG THE LICKING RIVER, KENTUCKY A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Department of Geology Of the College of Arts and Sciences 2004 by Ana Cristina Londono G. B.S., Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 1995 Committee Chair: Dr. David B. Nash ABSTRACT River bank instability has been linked with changing land use, deforestation and channel meandering. Fluctuations in water level, either seasonal or more frequent, have also been related to instability. Increased pore water pressure has been correlated with flooding. When, the level of water decreases rapidly, the pore water pressure within the soil remains high, thereby decreasing the soil’s effective shear strength. This reduction in shear strength may result in bank failure. The banks of the Licking River near Wilder, Kentucky were selected as a study site because they exhibit instability features: tension cracks, circular and wedge failures, slumps and piping, some of which developed after a major flooding event in 1997. Tensiometers were installed at depth from 4 ft to 10 ft and a piezometer was installed at a depth of 12 ft. The bank material is clay with low plasticity (CL) with total cohesion and friction angle of 27 kPa and 13o respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Ohio Geology 1966
    STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SU RVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Information Circular No. 37 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF OHIO GEOLOGY 1966 . 1970 compiled by Pauline Smyth Columbus 1972 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE OHIO DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Horace R. Collins, MS, State Geologist and Division Chief David K. Webb, Jr., PhD, Geologist and Assistant Chief Jean Simmons Brown, MS, Geologist and Editor William J. Buschman, Jr., BS, Administrative Geologist Michael C. Hansen, BS, Geologist Karen M. Harper, BS, Geologist Pauline Smyth, MS, Geologist Eleanor J. Hyle, Secretary W. Alfredia Moore, Clerk-Typist REGION AL GEOLOGY SECTION Richard A. Struble, PhD, Geologist and Section Head Richard W. Carlton, PhD, Geologist Michael L. Couchot, MS, Geologist Richard M. DeLong, MS, Geologist David S. Fullerton, PhD, Geologist Gerald H. Groenewold, PhD, Geologist Norman F. Knapp, MS, Chemist Arthur H. Morth, PhD, Chemical Engineer Donald L. Streib, PhD, Geochemist David A. Stith, MS, Geologist Joel D. Vormelker, MS, Geologist Frederick L. Rice, Laboratory Technician SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY SECTION Adriaan Janssens, PhD, Geologist and Section Head Michael J. Clifford, BS, Geologist Jeffrey B. Hermann, BS, Geologist Barbara J. Adams, Clerk-Typist B. Margalene Crammer, Clerk James Wooten, Geologist Aide LAKE ERIE SECTION David K. Webb, Jr., PhD, Geologist and Acting Section Head Lawrence L. Braidech, BS, Geologist Charles H. Carter, PhD, Geologist Walter R. Lemke, Boat Captain Dale L. Liebenthal, Geologist Aide Lynn M. Gerold, Clerk-Typist PUBLIC A TIO NS SECTION Harold J. Flint, Cartographer and Section Head James A. Brown, Cartographer Donald R. Camburn, Cartographer Philip J.
    [Show full text]
  • An Early Late Devonian Bone Bed-Pelagic Limestone Succession: the North Evans-Genundewa Limestone Story
    AN EARLY LATE DEVONIAN BONE BED-PELAGIC LIMESTONE SUCCESSION: THE NORTH EVANS-GENUNDEWA LIMESTONE STORY In memory of Daniel B. Sass (1919-2006) Gordon C. Baird, Dept of Geosciences, SUNY-Fredonia, Fredonia, NY 14063; William T. Kirchgasser, Dept. of Geology, SUNY-Potsdam, Potsdam, NY 13676; D. Jeffrey Over, Dept. of Geological Sciences, SUNY-Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454; Carlton E. Brett, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221. INTRODUCTION The Genesee Group succession in western New York represents deposition in dysoxic to near­ anoxic settings in the subsiding Appalachian foreland basin (Fig. 1) that records a series of widespread sedimentary and biological events. We will focus on lower and medial Genesee divisions that record changes in the basin that range in age from latest Middle Devonian into the early Late Devonian. In particular, we are interested in the genesis of styliolinid (pelagic) limestone units and associated bone-conodont beds. This paper will examine the results of recent mapping and biostratigraphic work on a succession of units in the Genesee Group, ranging, in upward succession, from basal Geneseo black shale facies into the lower part of the West River Formation. We will also highlight the discovery of two mappable discontinuity­ related bone-conodont beds in the lower part of the Genesee succession. The most important part of this project is the study of the regional character and inferred genesis of the North Evans Limestone (a famous conodont-bone lag unit above a major discontinuity) as well as that of the Genundewa Formation, a distinctive layer of pelagic, styliolinid carbonate that overlies the North Evans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Ohio—The Ordovician
    A Quarterly Publication of the Division of Geological Survey Fall 1997 THE GEOLOGY OF OHIO—THE ORDOVICIAN by Michael C. Hansen o geologists, the Ordovician System of Ohio bulge), accompanying development of a foreland is probably the most famous of the state’s basin to the east at the edge of the orogenic belt. As Paleozoic rock systems. The alternating shales the Taconic Orogeny reached its zenith in the Late Tand limestones of the upper part of this system crop Ordovician, sediments eroded from the rising out in southwestern Ohio in the Cincinnati region mountains were carried westward, forming a com- and yield an incredible abundance and diversity of plex delta system that discharged mud into the well-preserved fossils. Representatives of this fauna shallow seas that covered Ohio and adjacent areas. reside in museums and private collections through- The development of this delta, the Queenston Delta, out the world. Indeed, fossils from Ohio’s Ordovi- is recorded by the many beds of shale in Upper cian rocks define life of this geologic period, and the Ordovician rocks exposed in southwestern Ohio. rocks of this region, the Cincinnatian Series, serve The island arcs associated with continental as the North American Upper Ordovician Standard. collision were the sites of active volcanoes, as docu- Furthermore, in the late 1800’s, Ordovician rocks in mented by the widespread beds of volcanic ash the subsurface in northwestern Ohio were the source preserved in Ohio’s Ordovician rocks (see Ohio of the first giant oil and gas field in the country. Geology, Summer/Fall 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Calibrating Water Depths of Ordovician Communities
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2015, 64, 1, 19–23 doi: 10.3176/earth.2015.04 Calibrating water depths of Ordovician communities: lithological and ecological controls on depositional gradients in Upper Ordovician strata of southern Ohio and north-central Kentucky, USA Carlton E. Bretta, Thomas J. Malgieria, James R. Thomkab, Christopher D. Aucoina, Benjamin F. Dattiloc and Cameron E. Schwalbacha a Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b Department of Geosciences, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, USA; [email protected] c Department of Geoscience, Indiana University-Purdue University-Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805, USA; [email protected] Received 2 July 2014, accepted 13 October 2014 Abstract. Limestone and shale facies of the Upper Ordovician Grant Lake Formation (Katian: Cincinnatian, Maysvillian) are well exposed in the Cincinnati Arch region of southern Ohio and north-central Kentucky, USA. These rocks record a gradual change in lithofacies and biofacies along a gently northward-sloping ramp. This gradient spans very shallow, olive-gray, platy, laminated dolostones with sparse ostracodes in the south to offshore, nodular, phosphatic, brachiopod-rich limestones and marls in the north. This study uses facies analysis in outcrop to determine paleoenvironmental parameters, particularly those related to water depth (e.g., position of the photic zone and shoreline, relative degree of environmental energy). Within a tightly correlated stratigraphic interval (the Mount Auburn and Straight Creek members of the Grant Lake Formation and the Terrill Member of the Ashlock Formation), we document the occurrence of paleoenvironmental indicators, including desiccation cracks and light-depth indicators, such as red and green algal fossils and oncolites.
    [Show full text]
  • 7458 U-007-307.94 Schumacher, Ga, Em Swiniford, and Dl
    v I 7458 U-007-307.94 SCHUMACHER, G. A., E. M. SWINIFORD, AND D. L. SHRAKE, LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE GREAT LAKE LIMESTONE AND GRANT LAKE FORMATION (UPPER ORDOVICIAN) IN SOUTHWESTERN OHIO - COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL - MAY BE VIEWED BUT NOT COPIED - (USED AS A REFERENCE IN OU 5 RI) 00/00/91 OHIO J. SCI PUBIC 13 PAPER Lithostratigraphy of the Grant Lake Limestone and Grant Lake Formation (Upper Ordovician) in Southwestern Ohio1 GREGORYA. SCHUMACHEW,E. MAC SWNFORD, AND DOUGLASL. SHKAKE, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, 4383 Fountain Square Dr., Columbus, OH 43224 msmcr. The Grant Lake Limestone, including, in ascending order, the Bellevue, the Corryville, and the Straight Creek Members, and the Grant Lake Formation, including, in ascending order, the Bellevue, the Corryville, and the Mount Auburn Members, are herein defrned as lithostratigraphic units in southwestern Ohio. Regional bedrock mapping, shale-percentage and geophysical logs, and mean shale percentage of lithostratigraphic units demonstrate a progressive change from a limestone-dominant stratigraphic section in the Maysville, KY, region to a shale-dominantstratigraphic section in the Cincinnati,OH, region. The Grant Lake Limestone is redefrned to account for the progressive decrease in limestone content observed northwestward away from Maysville, KY. The Grant Lake Formation is introduced to describe the shale- dominant lateral equivalent of the Grant Lake Limestone in the Cincinnati, OH, region. The Bellevue Limestone, the Corryville Formation, and the Mount Auburn Formation are reduced to members because, in some cases, they are not mappable at 1:62,500 or smaller scales. The Straight Creek Member is introduced to describe the limestone-dominant lateral equivalent of the shale-dominant Mount Auburn Member.
    [Show full text]
  • Utica Shale Play Geology Review
    Utica Shale Play Geology review April 2017 Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Department of Energy www.eia.gov Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA’s data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other federal agencies EIA author contact: Dr. Olga Popova Email: [email protected] U.S. Energy Information Administration | Utica Shale Play i April 2017 Introduction The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is adding and updating geologic information and maps of the major tight formations and shale plays for the continental United States. This document outlines updated information and maps for the Utica shale play of the Appalachian basin. The geologic features characterized include a contoured elevation of the formation top (structure), contoured thickness (isopach), paleogeography elements, and tectonic structures (regional faults and folds, etc.), as well as play boundaries, well location, and initial GOR (gas-to-oil ratio) of wells producing from January 2004 through December 2016. EIA integrates these geologic elements into a series of maps. The Utica play map consists of layers of geologic and production information that users can view either as separate thematic maps (such as Figure 1) or as interactive layers of the U.S. Energy Mapping System. Additional map layers may be added if additional geologic data (such as petrophysical and thermodynamic formation properties) become available.
    [Show full text]