The Case and Treatment of Prominent Human Rights Lawyer Gao Zhisheng Hearing Congressional-Executive Commission on China

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Case and Treatment of Prominent Human Rights Lawyer Gao Zhisheng Hearing Congressional-Executive Commission on China THE CASE AND TREATMENT OF PROMINENT HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYER GAO ZHISHENG HEARING BEFORE THE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 14, 2012 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 74–543 PDF WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, SHERROD BROWN, Ohio, Cochairman Chairman MAX BAUCUS, Montana FRANK WOLF, Virginia CARL LEVIN, Michigan DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California EDWARD R. ROYCE, California JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon TIM WALZ, Minnesota SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio JAMES RISCH, Idaho MICHAEL HONDA, California EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS SETH D. HARRIS, Department of Labor MARIA OTERO, Department of State FRANCISCO J. SA´ NCHEZ, Department of Commerce KURT M. CAMPBELL, Department of State NISHA DESAI BISWAL, U.S. Agency for International Development PAUL B. PROTIC, Staff Director LAWRENCE T. LIU, Deputy Staff Director (II) CO N T E N T S Page Opening statement of Hon. Chris Smith, a U.S. Representative from New Jersey; Chairman, Congressional-Executive Commission on China ................ 1 Brown, Hon. Sherrod, a U.S. Senator from Ohio; Cochairman, Congressional- Executive Commission on China ........................................................................ 4 Wolf, Hon. Frank, a U.S. Representative from Virginia; Member, Congres- sional-Executive Commission on China ............................................................. 5 Geng He, wife of human rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng .......................................... 8 Li Jing, wife of democracy advocate Guo Quan .................................................... 10 Genser, Jared, Founder, Freedom Now and Managing Director, Perseus Strat- egies, LLC ............................................................................................................. 11 Fu, Bob, Founder and President, ChinaAid Association ...................................... 14 APPENDIX PREPARED STATEMENTS Geng He .................................................................................................................... 28 Li Jing ....................................................................................................................... 30 Genser, Jared ........................................................................................................... 34 Fu, Bob ..................................................................................................................... 39 Smith, Hon. Chris .................................................................................................... 68 Brown, Hon. Sherrod ............................................................................................... 70 SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD Article from the Epoch Times titled, ‘‘An Open Letter to China’s National Peoples’ Congress—Gao’s First Letter to CCP’s Leaders,’’ dated December 31, 2004, published March 25, 2006, submitted by Geng He ........................... 72 Article from the Epoch Times titled, ‘‘Stop Persecuting Believers of Freedom and Mend Your Ties With the Chinese People—Gao Zhisheng’s Second Open Letter About the Persecution of Falun Gong,’’ dated October 18, 2005, published October 24, 2005, submitted by Geng He ............................... 76 Article from the Epoch Times titled, ‘‘We Must Immediately Stop the Bru- tality That Suffocates Our Nation’s Conscience and Morality—Gao Zhisheng’s Third Open Letter to Chinese Leaders,’’ dated December 15, 2005, published December 16, 2005, submitted by Geng He ........................... 83 ‘‘Dark Night, Dark Hood and Kidnapping by Dark Mafia,’’ by Gao Zhisheng, submitted by Geng He ......................................................................................... 98 ‘‘AP Exclusive: Missing Chinese Lawyer Told of Abuse,’’ by Charles Hutzler, Associated Press, dated January 10, 2011, submitted by Geng He ................. 103 Gao Zhisheng’s Statement Withdrawing From the Chinese Communist Party, dated December 13, 2005, submitted by Geng He ............................................ 110 Freedom Now Media Release titled, ‘‘Imprisoned Chinese Human Rights Law- yer Gao Zhisheng’s Legal Team File Petition With United Nations Urging His Immediate Release,’’ dated January 25, 2012, submitted by Jared Genser ................................................................................................................... 111 Written Statement of Michael Horowitz, Senior Fellow, the Hudson Institute, submitted by Bob Fu ............................................................................................ 119 Gao Zhisheng’s Open Letter to the U.S. Congress, dated September 27, 2007, submitted by Hon. Chris Smith .......................................................................... 119 (III) THE CASE AND TREATMENT OF PROMINENT HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYER GAO ZHISHENG TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2012 CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA, Washington, DC. The hearing was convened, pursuant to notice, at 12:31 p.m., in room 2118, Rayburn House Office Building, Representative Chris Smith, Chairman, presiding. Also present: Senator Sherrod Brown; Representative Tim Walz; Representative Frank Wolf. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. CHRIS SMITH, A U.S. REP- RESENTATIVE FROM NEW JERSEY; CHAIRMAN, CONGRES- SIONAL–EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA Chairman SMITH. The Commission will come to order. I want to welcome all of our distinguished panelists and guests, and thank you for being here. Ladies and gentlemen, as President Obama welcomes Vice Presi- dent Xi Jinping, Chinese Leader-in-Waiting, to the White House today, our Commission will hear testimony from two wives who are appealing for the immediate release of their jailed husbands, great human rights leaders back in China. We will also hear from two human rights experts as well who will give great insight and detail as to the issues before us. As Chairman, I hope that President Obama does not put human rights last on the agenda, or not at all, as he did when President Hu Jintao visited the White House on January 19, 2011. One of the wives, Li Jing, says that ‘‘only the United States can make this case to China,’’ that is the case of her husband and the case of the disappeared and incarcerated human rights leaders. Please, President Obama, listen to these courageous women, Geng He and Li Jing, and act decisively. The China Commission hopes that the issue of human rights abuses in China will be raised in a serious and visible way during the Vice President’s visit, and particularly that the detention of Gao Zhisheng, Liu Xiaobo, Chen Guangcheng, Guo Quan, Liu Xiabin, Pastor Yang Rongli, and Alimujiang Yimiti, and others is raised often and discussed in detail. This important and timely hearing recognizes one of China’s most important human rights leaders and lawyers, Gao Zhisheng. In early 2000, Mr. Gao, a self-trained lawyer, emerged as a cham- pion of human rights causes and a defender of marginalized groups (1) 2 in China. Today, we know little about Mr. Gao’s current condition or his whereabouts. Then the issue of Guo Quan, who is an academic and professor who published an open letter to President Hu calling for multi- party elections, posted a charter for a new democracy party online and called for the end of China’s notorious reeducation through labor system. For that, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Gao Zhisheng’s brilliant legal advocacy on behalf of marginalized groups in China, including religious practitioners, the Falun Gong, and others, Christians, rural workers, human rights activists, and more, resulted in him being sentenced on trumped up inciting sub- version charges in 2006. He was sentenced to three years imprisonment, but granted a five-year suspended sentence or period of parole. During this time, however, Mr. Gao was subjected to years of brutal torture and he repeatedly ‘‘disappeared.’’ An outspoken Christian, Mr. Gao has been disappeared into official custody since February 2009, with only a brief reappearance under official supervision in March and April 2010. Information on Mr. Gao’s enforced disappearance and current condition remain a closely guarded secret. For months and years we heard nothing of Mr. Gao’s ongoing detention or torture. Two months ago, however, Chinese officials announced that Mr. Gao would be forced to serve out his original three-year criminal sen- tence a week before he should have finished his five-year parole pe- riod. The announcement claimed that Mr. Gao violated the conditions of his parole. Of course, no details were provided. One can only wonder what violations Mr. Gao committed since he has been held incommunicado during a majority of his parole period and has been, as I said, brutally tortured by the Chinese Government throughout. In the past month, his brother and other family members have been turned away in their attempts to visit Mr. Gao. We have re- ceived no word on his health or condition. An expert witness will demonstrate the official case against Gao Zhisheng is not only rife with villainy, but also bereft of any semblance of humanity. In an account of Mr.
Recommended publications
  • Issues and Cases CHRD Recommends the Committee Against Torture Include in Its List of Issues for the Chinese Government to Address in Its Fifth Periodic Report
    Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) 维权网 Web: http://chrdnet.org/ Email: [email protected] Promoting human rights and empowering grassroots activism in China September 8, 2010 Issues and Cases CHRD Recommends the Committee against Torture Include in its List of Issues for the Chinese Government to Address in its Fifth Periodic Report This submission, prepared by Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD), raises a number of issues and cases which we urge the Committee against Torture (CAT) to include in the List of Issues (LOI) it will request the Chinese government to address in its fifth periodic report to CAT. This document is also intended to supplement our recent report on the Chinese government‘s December 2009 submission to CAT under the Committee‘s follow-up procedure.1 Torture remains a serious problem in China and one that urgently demands a genuine commitment to reform on the part of the Chinese government. This submission does not purport to provide a comprehensive overview of the current situation, but rather identifies some of the areas of greatest concern. We urge CAT to press the Chinese government for concrete evidence of actions being taken to address the issues and cases raised here, many of which CAT has raised with China in the past. I. Recommended Issues for CAT to Include in its LOI for the Chinese Government A. Unnatural deaths in detention centers Owing partially to local officials‘ ham-handed attempts to cover up unnatural deaths of individuals in police custody through bizarre, often illogical explanations, detention center (kanshousuo) deaths has been one of the most visible human rights issues in China during the past two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian House Church Members by the Public
    Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Page 1 of 8 Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Home > Research Program > Responses to Information Requests Responses to Information Requests Responses to Information Requests (RIR) respond to focused Requests for Information that are submitted to the Research Directorate in the course of the refugee protection determination process. The database contains a seven- year archive of English and French RIRs. Earlier RIRs may be found on the UNHCR's Refworld website. Please note that some RIRs have attachments which are not electronically accessible. To obtain a PDF copy of an RIR attachment please email [email protected]. 10 October 2014 CHN104966.E China: Treatment of "ordinary" Christian house church members by the Public Security Bureau (PSB), including treatment of children of house church members (2009-2014) Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa 1. House Church Demography According to the Bertelsmann Stiftung Transformation Index (BTI), which analyzes the quality of democracy and political management in 128 countries (Bertelsmann Stiftung n.d.), there are an estimated 80 million Christians in China, "many of whom congregate in illegal house churches" (ibid. 2014, 5). The Wall Street Journal reports that house church members could number between 30 and 60 million (29 July 2011). Voice of America (VOA) notes that the exact number of Christians is difficult to estimate because many worship at underground house churches (VOA 16 June 2014). For detailed information on the estimated number of registered and unregistered Christians in China, by denomination, as of 2012, see Response to Information Request CHN104189.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction Chinese Citizens Continue to Face Substantial Obstacles in Seeking Remedies to Government Actions That Violate Th
    1 ACCESS TO JUSTICE Introduction Chinese citizens continue to face substantial obstacles in seeking remedies to government actions that violate their legal rights and constitutionally protected freedoms. International human rights standards require effective remedies for official violations of citi- zens’ rights. Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that ‘‘Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the funda- mental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.’’ 1 Article 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which China has signed but not yet ratified, requires that all parties to the ICCPR ensure that persons whose rights or free- doms are violated ‘‘have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.’’ 2 The Third Plenum and Judicial Reform The November 2013 Chinese Communist Party Central Com- mittee Third Plenum Decision on Certain Major Issues Regarding Comprehensively Deepening Reforms (Third Plenum Decision) con- tained several items relating to judicial system reform.3 In June 2014, the office of the Party’s Central Leading Small Group for Comprehensively Deepening Reform announced that six provinces and municipalities—Shanghai, Guangdong, Jilin, Hubei, Hainan, and Qinghai—would serve as pilot sites for certain judicial reforms, including divesting local governments of their control over local court funding and appointments and centralizing
    [Show full text]
  • 28. Rights Defense and New Citizen's Movement
    JOBNAME: EE10 Biddulph PAGE: 1 SESS: 3 OUTPUT: Fri May 10 14:09:18 2019 28. Rights defense and new citizen’s movement Teng Biao 28.1 THE RISE OF THE RIGHTS DEFENSE MOVEMENT The ‘Rights Defense Movement’ (weiquan yundong) emerged in the early 2000s as a new focus of the Chinese democracy movement, succeeding the Xidan Democracy Wall movement of the late 1970s and the Tiananmen Democracy movement of 1989. It is a social movement ‘involving all social strata throughout the country and covering every aspect of human rights’ (Feng Chongyi 2009, p. 151), one in which Chinese citizens assert their constitutional and legal rights through lawful means and within the legal framework of the country. As Benney (2013, p. 12) notes, the term ‘weiquan’is used by different people to refer to different things in different contexts. Although Chinese rights defense lawyers have played a key role in defining and providing leadership to this emerging weiquan movement (Carnes 2006; Pils 2016), numerous non-lawyer activists and organizations are also involved in it. The discourse and activities of ‘rights defense’ (weiquan) originated in the 1990s, when some citizens began using the law to defend consumer rights. The 1990s also saw the early development of rural anti-tax movements, labor rights campaigns, women’s rights campaigns and an environmental movement. However, in a narrow sense as well as from a historical perspective, the term weiquan movement only refers to the rights campaigns that emerged after the Sun Zhigang incident in 2003 (Zhu Han 2016, pp. 55, 60). The Sun Zhigang incident not only marks the beginning of the rights defense movement; it also can be seen as one of its few successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in China and U.S. Policy: Issues for the 117Th Congress
    Human Rights in China and U.S. Policy: Issues for the 117th Congress March 31, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46750 SUMMARY R46750 Human Rights in China and U.S. Policy: Issues March 31, 2021 for the 117th Congress Thomas Lum U.S. concern over human rights in China has been a central issue in U.S.-China relations, Specialist in Asian Affairs particularly since the Tiananmen crackdown in 1989. In recent years, human rights conditions in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have deteriorated, while bilateral tensions related to trade Michael A. Weber and security have increased, possibly creating both constraints and opportunities for U.S. policy Analyst in Foreign Affairs on human rights. After consolidating power in 2013, Chinese Communist Party General Secretary and State President Xi Jinping intensified and expanded the reassertion of party control over society that began toward the end of the term of his predecessor, Hu Jintao. Since 2017, the government has enacted new laws that place further restrictions on civil society in the name of national security, authorize greater controls over minority and religious groups, and further constrain the freedoms of PRC citizens. Government methods of social and political control are evolving to include the widespread use of sophisticated surveillance and big data technologies. Arrests of human rights advocates and lawyers intensified in 2015, followed by party efforts to instill ideological conformity across various spheres of society. In 2016, President Xi launched a policy known as “Sinicization,” under which the government has taken additional measures to compel China’s religious practitioners and ethnic minorities to conform to Han Chinese culture, support China’s socialist system as defined by the Communist Party, abide by Communist Party policies, and reduce ethnic differences and foreign influences.
    [Show full text]
  • Hu Jia on Behalf of the Silenced Voices of China and Tibet
    Sakharov Prize 2008 Year for China Hu Jia On behalf of the silenced voices of China and Tibet Hu Jia and his wife, Zeng Jinyan, were nominated for last year's Sakharov Prize and were among the final three short-listed candidates. Hu Jia was consequently imprisoned and remains in prison to this day. Hu Jia is a prominent human rights activist who works on various issues including civil rights, environmental protection and AIDS advocacy. He was arrested shortly after his testimony on 26 November 2007 via conference call before the European Parliament's sub-committee on Human Rights. In his statement, he expressed his desire that 2008 be the “year of human rights in China”. He also pointed out that the Chinese national security department was creating a human rights disaster with one million people persecuted for fighting for human rights and many of them detained in prison, in camps or mental hospitals. He also said: "The irony is that one of the people in charge of organising the Olympics is the head of the Public Security Bureau in Beijing who is responsible for so many human rights violations. The promises of China are not being kept before the games." As a direct result of his address to members of the European Parliament, Hu Jia was arrested, charged with "inciting subversion of state power", and sentenced on 3 April 2008 to three-and-a-half years' in jail with one year denial of political rights. He was found guilty of writing articles about the human rights situation in the run-up to the Olympic Games.
    [Show full text]
  • Directors, Supervisors and Senior Management
    THIS DOCUMENT IS IN DRAFT FORM, INCOMPLETE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND THAT THE INFORMATION MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SECTION HEADED “WARNING” ON THE COVER OF THIS DOCUMENT. DIRECTORS, SUPERVISORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS App1A-41 3rd Sch(6) Our incumbent Board comprises 15 Directors, including three executive Directors, seven non-executive Directors and five independent non-executive Directors. Our Directors are elected for a term of three years and can be re-elected, provided that the cumulative term of an independent non-executive Director shall not exceed six years in accordance with the relevant PRC laws and regulations. The following table sets forth certain information regarding our Directors. Date of Date of Joining Appointment Name Age the Bank as a Director Position1 Responsibilities Mr. WANG Tianyu 49 August 1996 December 2005 Chairman, Being responsible for (王天宇) ...................... Executive Director the overall operations and strategic management of the Bank, performing his duty as a Director through the Board, and being responsible for the strategic development committee Mr. SHEN Xueqing 50 December 2011 February 2012 President, Being responsible for (申學清) ...................... Executive Director the daily operations and management of the Bank, and performing his duty as a Director through the Board and the strategic development committee Mr. ZHANG Rongshun 56 August 1996 August 1996 Vice chairman, Being responsible for (張榮順) ...................... Executive Director the operations of the internal audit office of the Board, performing his duty as a Director through the Board and the strategic development committee 1 The Bank has started to designate its Directors as executive Directors or non-executive Directors since February 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloomberg Xi Jinping Millionaire Relations Reveal Elite Chinese Fortunes by Bloomberg News
    NEWSBloomberg Xi Jinping Millionaire Relations Reveal Elite Chinese Fortunes By Bloomberg News June 29, 2012 – Xi Jinping, the man in line to be China’s next president, warned officials on a 2004 anti-graft conference call: “Rein in your spouses, children, relatives, friends and staff, and vow not to use power for personal gain.” As Xi climbed the Communist Party ranks, his extended family expanded their business interests to include minerals, real estate and mobile-phone equipment, according to public documents compiled by Bloomberg. Those interests include investments in companies with total assets of $376 million; an 18 percent indirect stake in a rare- earths company with $1.73 billion in assets; and a $20.2 million holding in a Xi Jinping, vice president of China, visits the China Shipping terminal at the Port of Los Angeles in Los Angeles, California, U.S., on publicly traded technology company. The figures Thursday, Feb. 16, 2012. Source: Bloomberg don’t account for liabilities and thus don’t reflect the family’s net worth. No assets were traced to Xi, who turns 59 this provinces and joining the ruling Politburo Standing month; his wife Peng Liyuan, 49, a famous People’s Committee in 2007. Along the way, he built a Liberation Army singer; or their daughter, the reputation for clean government. documents show. There is no indication Xi intervened He led an anti-graft campaign in the rich coastal to advance his relatives’ business transactions, or of province of Zhejiang, where he issued the “rein in” any wrongdoing by Xi or his extended family.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGAL ADVOCACY and the 2011 CRACKDOWN in CHINA: ADVERSITY, REPRESSION, and RESILIENCE
    1. All persons are entitled to call upon the assistance of a lawyer of their choice to protect and establish their rights and to defend them in all stages of criminal proceedings. 2. Governments co railtoroype and subject to their jurisdiction, tion rat erna ion without distinction of any kind, such as discrimination based on race, colour, ethnic origin, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, nationalt or social origin, property, birth, economic or i in n yf , to other disadvanptaged persons. Professional o r t o associations of lawyers shall cooperate in the organization and provision of services, facilities and other resources. 4. Governments and profnessional associations ofm lawyers shall promote e o m t programmes to inform the public about their rights and duties under the law and the important role of lawyers in protecting their fundamene tal freedoms. Special attenintion should be given to ac v g and rld e h i e assisting the poor and other disadvantagedo a persons so as to enable them to assert their rights and where necessary call upon the assistanh ce of lawyers. 5. Governments shae ll ensure that all w t e r n c h m s t u c e t e r s p p f , p o o o s e persons are immediately informed by the competein t authority of their right to be assisted by a lawyer of their own choice upon arrest or detention or when charged with a crimu en r cef . 6. r r g agin o o t i pe p e r e s r e l h Any such persons who do not havee a lawyer shall, in a all cases in which the interests of justice so require, be entitled to have a lawyer of experience and competence commensurate with the h u t l i m s a t h nedn to them in order to prov ofo pay for such services.
    [Show full text]
  • Silk Road Fashion, China. the City and a Gate, the Pass and a Road – Four Components That Make Luoyang the Capital of the Silk Roads Between 1St and 7Th Century AD
    https://publications.dainst.org iDAI.publications ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATIONEN DES DEUTSCHEN ARCHÄOLOGISCHEN INSTITUTS Dies ist ein digitaler Sonderdruck des Beitrags / This is a digital offprint of the article Patrick Wertmann Silk Road Fashion, China. The City and a Gate, the Pass and a Road – Four components that make Luoyang the capital of the Silk Roads between 1st and 7th century AD. The year 2018 aus / from e-Forschungsberichte Ausgabe / Issue Seite / Page 19–37 https://publications.dainst.org/journals/efb/2178/6591 • urn:nbn:de:0048-dai-edai-f.2019-0-2178 Verantwortliche Redaktion / Publishing editor Redaktion e-Jahresberichte und e-Forschungsberichte | Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Weitere Informationen unter / For further information see https://publications.dainst.org/journals/efb ISSN der Online-Ausgabe / ISSN of the online edition ISSN der gedruckten Ausgabe / ISSN of the printed edition Redaktion und Satz / Annika Busching ([email protected]) Gestalterisches Konzept: Hawemann & Mosch Länderkarten: © 2017 www.mapbox.com ©2019 Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale, Podbielskiallee 69–71, 14195 Berlin, Tel: +49 30 187711-0 Email: [email protected] / Web: dainst.org Nutzungsbedingungen: Die e-Forschungsberichte 2019-0 des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts stehen unter der Creative-Commons-Lizenz Namensnennung – Nicht kommerziell – Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International. Um eine Kopie dieser Lizenz zu sehen, besuchen Sie bitte http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional-Executive Commission on China Annual Report 2019
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–743 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate JAMES P. MCGOVERN, Massachusetts, MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Co-chair Chair JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio TOM COTTON, Arkansas THOMAS SUOZZI, New York STEVE DAINES, Montana TOM MALINOWSKI, New Jersey TODD YOUNG, Indiana BEN MCADAMS, Utah DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California CHRISTOPHER SMITH, New Jersey JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon BRIAN MAST, Florida GARY PETERS, Michigan VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Department of State, To Be Appointed Department of Labor, To Be Appointed Department of Commerce, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed JONATHAN STIVERS, Staff Director PETER MATTIS, Deputy Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT C O N T E N T S Page I.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Thesis Or Dissertation, Worded
    “USING THE PEAK OF THE FIVE ELDERS AS A BRUSH”: A CALLIGRAPHIC SCREEN BY JUNG HYUN-BOK (1909-1973) by HAN ZHU A THESIS Presented to the Department of Art History and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts June 2012 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Han Zhu Title: “Using the Peak of the Five Elders as a Brush”: A Calligraphic Screen by Jung Hyun-bok (1909-1973) This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Department of Art History by: Charles Lachman Chairperson Akiko Walley Member Yugen Wang Member and Kimberly Andrews Espy Vice President for Research & Innovation/Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2012 ii © 2012 Han Zhu iii THESIS ABSTRACT Han Zhu Master of Arts Department of Art History June 2012 Title: “Using the Peak of the Five Elders as a Brush”: A Calligraphic Screen by Jung Hyun-bok (1909-1973) Korean calligraphy went through tremendous changes during the twentieth century, and Jung Hyun-bok (1909-1973), a gifted calligrapher, played an important role in bringing about these changes. This thesis focuses on one of Jung’s most mature and refined works, “Using the Peak of the Five Elders as a Brush,” owned by the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art. In addition to translating and explicating the poems on the screen, through a close examination of both the form and content of the work I explore how it reflects Jung’s values, intentions, and background.
    [Show full text]