CHAPTER XIV the Two New Australian Infantry Divisions, 4Th and 5Th, Which Had Been Formed at the Elid of February, but Left in E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CHAPTER XIV the Two New Australian Infantry Divisions, 4Th and 5Th, Which Had Been Formed at the Elid of February, but Left in E CHAPTER XIV THE START ON THE SOMhiE-AND FROMELLES THEtwo new Australian infantry divisions, 4th and 5th, which had been formed at the elid of February, but left in Egypt for three months to create their artillery, had received at the end of hlay the order to move to the Western Front. The creation of that artillery was a task unparalleled in British experience, and is the classic example of the speed with which _Australians could be trained. To instruct the 3000 artillery officers and men re- quired by each division, some 150 trained officers and men from the older divisions were allotted to each. The rest were light horsemen and infantrymen together with a few hundred artillery reiniorcements, mostly untrained, and a handful from the engineer and other services. The 4th Division had not one regular artillery officer. For instructing the 12th Field Artillery Brigade Lieut.- Colonel R. A. Rabett (who himself started in the war as a young militia officer) had 5 artillery officers-3 with Anzac experience and 2 reinforcements-and some 30 more or less experienced artillerymen. He had to select 17 officers from non-artillery units, and train them each morning from 4.30 to 6.30, when they in turn began teaching their men. Within a fortnight the new officers, themselves being lectured for four hours daily, and teaching their men for eight hours, were producing results. Only five guns were available, but these were used in relays. In April the artillery were sent to join their infantry on the Canal defences where instruction continued. I ANZAC TO AMIENS [Mar.-June 1916 In the training of the infantry of these divisions there occurred the harshest experience that the A.I.F.’s instruc- tion had ever included. When the older divisions were being moved from the Canal there occurred a shortage of trains to take the new divisions to the Canal. It was therefore decided that all except the leading troops (the 8th Brigade and a battalion of the 4th) should march thither across the desert. The distance was less than forty miles comprising two fifteen-mile stages and a shorter stage on the third day. It was decided to make the march a test, the men carrying full kit, packs, and ammunition. But even in Monash’s, Glasgow’s and Glasfurd’s brigades, which took the usual precautions for desert marching, the movement was accomplished only with great suffering on the part of the troops. In the 14th Brigade, however, possibly because men broke the ranks in order to drink the foul water of the “Sweet-water” Canal, which lay beside part of the route, the brigadier (who was afterwards removed for this mistake) insisted on their marching on through the midday hours. The process ended in an almost complete break-down; parched and exhausted men staggered into the New Zealanders’ camp at Moascar on the second evening, leaving many to be picked up during the night by the ambulances and by the succouring New Zealanders. It was rumoured later that some men died through the results; a search of the records after the war did not confirm this, but it may nevertheless have been correct. On arrival in France the 4th Division, in which the “outside” States-Queensland, S. and W. Australia and Tasmania-were much more strongly represented than in any other division,’ began to enter the line towards the end of June, and by July 4th its artillerymen, who in March had been light horsemen and infantrymen, were responsible for covering their sector of the Western 1 It was composed of three all-States brigades-Monash’s 4th Bde, the 12th Bde (formed from [tic 4th). and the 13th (formed from the 3rd). 218 June-July 19161 THE SOMME Front. This division had by then already raided the Ger- mans, and it was itself raided while its artillery was relieving that of the 2nd Division. (Though the Germans captured a prisoner, their staff remained unaware that the 4th and 5th Australian Divisions had left Egypt.) By July 5th the 1st and 2nd Divisions had been relieved. General Godley and the staff of I1 Anzac became respon- sible for the sector, the New Zealand Division remaining there under them, with the 5th Australian Division from Egypt just arriving in the back area. The 1st and 2nd under Birdwood and the staff of I Anzac were moving into the sector opposite Messines when, on July 7th, orders arrived that by the 13th they must be in the Amiens area, sixty miles to the south, ready for a con- tinuation of the somme offensive. The project of a stroke against Messines had for the present been given up, and plans and maps for that scheme, then in preparation by I Anzac at Bailleul, were returned to the 2nd Army staff. For the great Somme offensive was then in full swing. A week previously, on 1st July 1916, the British and French armies twenty miles east of Amiens had launched their attack astride that river. After a bombardment, which eventually was extended to seven days, the 4th British Army (General Sir Henry Rawlinson) to- gether with part of the 3rd, and a group of French armies under General Foch, were to break the German line, striking in three stages towards Bapaume, ten miles away. If, as was hoped, in any of these stages a sufficient breach was made, a British “Reserve Army”, chiefly of cavalry, under the cavalry leader, General Sir Hubert Gough, would try to push through to the Bapaume plateau and then, turning north, would “roll up” the German line north of the breach. The bombardment (in which two siege batteries formed from the regular Australian garrison artillery took part) had since June 25th methodically smashed the German defences. At one time every gun and howitzer 219 ANZAC TO AMlENS [ngth June-1st July 1916 would fire rapidly with high explosive for twelve minutes on all the villages, following this fire with shrapnel to catch any troops disturbed by this deluge. On other days all German batteries known to the British intelligence staff were shelled; or trenches of the first and second lines were taken under fire and methodically battered down from end to end; or a barrage, like that which would pre- cede the infantry’s advance, was laid on the enemy’s front line, and then lengthened, and then suddenly brought back to catch the German infantry, who might be manning the parapet in expectation of attack. The “bump” of the guns could be heard in England, and under the long drawn out strain the German garrison, whose food, drink and ammunition parties sometimes could not get through, lost in some parts its power of resistance. Thus, when the attack came, on the sector astride the Somme, where Foch’s armies for their six-mile front were supported by no less than goo heavy pieces of artillery, two splendid French corps, the XX north of the Somme and the I Colonial Corps south of the river, penetrated so fast that the German command opposite to them hastily withdrew its troops to a line close in front of Ptronne town, six miles away. The British right flank, immedi- ately north of the French, advanced to the same depth, reaching Montauban village, on the ridge on which lay the second German defence system. It was only through Sir Douglas Haig’s insistence-against the view of the less optimistic commander of the 4th Army, General Rawlin- son-that the first British thrust had been designed to go so deep. But the British Army, though supported by artillery and ammunition on a scale previously unknown to it, was not yet gunned on a scale comparable with the French, Behind its fifteen and a half miles of front were some 400 heavy pieces, and the 12,776 tons of shells used by them on the first day was only half of what the British 220 ist-14th July 19161 THE SOMME were able to throw at the Germans on the first day of the Battle of Arras, nine months later. The deep German dugouts were almost unaffected by the bombardment; at the La Boisselle ruins, on the road from Albert to Bapaume, a little north of the British penetration to Montauban, the attacking troops, Tynesiders of the 34th “New Army” Division, were, for all their devotion, held up practically at the front line. Farther north, where the 3rd British Army attacked with less powerful artillery support, the assault, though it went deep at several points, was largely stopped at the front line, with tragic losses. That day the 29th Division lost 5000 men and the 36th (Ulster) Division, which, with part of the 32nd, had pushed to and beyond Thiepval on the ridge that but- tressed the northern flank of the Germans, lost 5500. Despite sucli losses a tremendous blow had been struck; and though the achievements did not approach the stage at which Gough’s Reserve Army could be used, nevertheless decisive results seemed to Haig within reach. He knew he must first widen the wedge driven into the German line, and, to do this, must take Thiepval. JofEre vigorously urged him to attack Thiepval again frontally, but Haig was determined to drive farther on the southern flank, where his success had been greatest, and then attack Thiepval from there. He accordingly placed General Gough in command of the front facing Thiepval, the divisions there becoining the “Reselve Army’’. Gough was ordered to hold the enemy while Rawlinson with the 4th Army continued to drive ahead.
Recommended publications
  • Major General James Harold CANNAN CB, CMG, DSO, VD
    Major General James Harold CANNAN CB, CMG, DSO, VD [1882 – 1976] Major General Cannan is distinguished by his service in the Militia, as a senior officer in World War 1 and as the Australian Army’s Quartermaster General in World War 2. Major General James Harold Cannan, CB, CMG, DSO, VD (29 August 1882 – 23 May 1976) was a Queenslander by birth and a long-term member of the United Service Club. He rose to brigadier general in the Great War and served as the Australian Army’s Quartermaster General during the Second World War after which it was said that his contribution to the defence of Australia was immense; his responsibility for supply, transport and works, a giant-sized burden; his acknowledgement—nil. We thank the History Interest Group and other volunteers who have researched and prepared these Notes. The series will be progressively expanded and developed. They are intended as casual reading for the benefit of Members, who are encouraged to advise of any inaccuracies in the material. Please do not reproduce them or distribute them outside of the Club membership. File: HIG/Biographies/Cannan Page 1 Cannan was appointed Commanding Officer of the 15th Battalion in 1914 and landed with it at ANZAC Cove on the evening of 25 April 1915. The 15th Infantry Battalion later defended Quinn's Post, one of the most exposed parts of the Anzac perimeter, with Cannan as post commander. On the Western Front, Cannan was CO of 15th Battalion at the Battle of Pozières and Battle of Mouquet Farm. He later commanded 11th Brigade at the Battle of Messines and the Battle of Broodseinde in 1917, and the Battle of Hamel and during the Hundred Days Offensive in 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSI of NSW Paper
    Jump TO Article The article on the pages below is reprinted by permission from United Service (the journal of the Royal United Services Institute of New South Wales), which seeks to inform the defence and security debate in Australia and to bring an Australian perspective to that debate internationally. The Royal United Services Institute of New South Wales (RUSI NSW) has been promoting informed debate on defence and security issues since 1888. To receive quarterly copies of United Service and to obtain other significant benefits of RUSI NSW membership, please see our online Membership page: www.rusinsw.org.au/Membership Jump TO Article INSTITUTE PROCEEDINGS The Australian Army’s 2nd Division: an update1 an address to the Institute on 24 September 2013 by Brigadier Peter Clay, CSC Deputy Commander 2nd Division, on behalf of Major General S. L. Smith, AM, CSC, RFD Commander 2nd Division Vice-Patron, Royal United Services Institute, New South Wales Brigadier Clay details how the Australian Army’s 2nd Division, which contains most of the Australian Army Reserve, has progressed in achieving its force modernisation challenges under Army’s Plan Beersheba and outlines the delivery of a multi-role Reserve battle group for Army by the year 2015. Key words: Plan Beersheba, Total Force, Multi-role Reserve Battle Group, Exercise Hamel/Talisman Sabre, Army Reserve. On behalf of Commander 2nd Division, Major General very little change to their respective organisational Steve Smith, in this paper I will provide an update on the manning, with the exception of 11th Brigade, which has Division’s progress in integrating into the Army’s ‘Total inherited the vast majority of 7th Brigade’s Reserve assets Force’1 under Plan Beersheba2.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002 Requested date: 2002 Release date: 2003 Posted date: 08-February-2021 Source of document: Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. 1 O ct 2000_30 April 2002 Creation Date Requester Last Name Case Subject 36802.28679 STRANEY TECHNOLOGICAL GROWTH OF INDIA; HONG KONG; CHINA AND WTO 36802.2992 CRAWFORD EIGHT DIFFERENT REQUESTS FOR REPORTS REGARDING CIA EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS 36802.43927 MONTAN EDWARD GRADY PARTIN 36802.44378 TAVAKOLI-NOURI STEPHEN FLACK GUNTHER 36810.54721 BISHOP SCIENCE OF IDENTITY FOUNDATION 36810.55028 KHEMANEY TI LEAF PRODUCTIONS, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • 10Th Battalion (Australia)
    Article Talk Read Edit View history Search Wikipedia Participate in an international science photo competition! Main page Contents 10th Battalion (Australia) Featured content Current events From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Random article Donate to Wikipedia For other uses, see 2/10th Battalion (Australia). Wikipedia store The 10th Battalion was an infantry battalion of the Australian Army that served as 10th Battalion part of the all-volunteer Australian Imperial Force during World War I. Among the first Interaction units raised in Australia during the war, the battalion was recruited from South Help About Wikipedia Australia in August 1914 and formed part of the 3rd Brigade, 1st Division. After basic Community portal training, the battalion embarked for Egypt where further training was undertaken until Recent changes the battalion was committed to the Gallipoli campaign. During the landing at Anzac Contact page Cove, it came ashore as part of the initial covering force. Members of the 10th Battalion penetrated the furthest inland of any Australian troops during the initial Tools fighting, before the Allied advance inland was checked. After this, the battalion What links here helped defend the beachhead against a heavy counter-attack in May, before joining Lines of the 9th and 10th Battalions at Mena Camp, Related changes Egypt, December 1914, looking towards the pyramids. the failed August Offensive. Casualties were heavy throughout the campaign and in Upload file The soldier in the foreground is playing with a Special pages November 1915, the surviving members were withdrawn from the peninsula. In early kangaroo, the regimental mascot Permanent link 1916, the battalion was reorganised in Egypt at which time it provided a cadre staff Active 1914–1919 Page information to the newly formed 50th Battalion.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER XXII on Their Return to Egypt the Australian Formations Were Sent to the Suez Canal Zone and Helped to Form There A
    CHAPTER XXII EGYPT : REORGANISATION OF THE A.I.F. ON their return to Egypt the Australian formations were sent to the Suez Canal zone and helped to form there a new defensive front for Egypt. Simultaneously with this service the force was reorganised : the infantry into five divisions, forming, with the New Zealand Division, two army corps destined for the Western Front ; the light horse into the Anzac Mounted Division and other mounted units which became part of a British force which fought for the rest of the war in Egypt, Sinai, and Palestine. The self-government of the force in all matters of internal administration was established, though not yet entirely recognised by all the authorities that dealt with it; in the medical service the new director, his powers being now confirmed by the Commonwealth Govern- ment but not fully admitted by the War Office, collected the new medical staff of the A.I.F., hastened clearance to Australia, finalised reforms in the dental and nursing services, and carried out in the A.A.M.C. units a reorganisation, which embodied several experiments of interest. * * 8 The closing of the Gallipoli campaign opened for the A.I.F. a new phase in its history, with service in a much wider and more diversified sphere of action. The next Return to three months were occupied in a complete Eemt reconstruction and reorganisation of the force, carried out while the troops were taking their part in the dispositions for the new strategic situation. The mise-en-scine of the reorganisation was the neighbourhood of the Suez Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report
    H U M A N ON THEIR WATCH R I G H T S Evidence of Senior Army Officers’ Responsibility WATCH for False Positive Killings in Colombia On Their Watch Evidence of Senior Army Officers’ Responsibility for False Positive Killings in Colombia Copyright © 2015 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-32507 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JUNE 2015 978-1-6231-32507 On Their Watch Evidence of Senior Army Officers’ Responsibility for False Positive Killings in Colombia Map .................................................................................................................................... i Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rustin Military Collection
    Richard Rustin Military Books Donated 3 October 2009 THE RUSTIN MILITARY COLLECTION The Rustin Military Collection consists of nearly a thousand military books and periodicals collected by Richard E. Rustin during his lifetime. His wife, Ginette Rustin, donated this collection from his estate to the Archive Center and Genealogy Department, Indian River County Main Library, in October 2009 – April 2010. Richard E. Rustin passed away July, 2008. His wife considered him a genius regarding military history. He was a brilliant writer, a former reporter, manager and assistant chief of the New York news bureau. He edited coverage at the heart of the Wall Street Journal’s financial and economic news operations. He served in the U. S. Navy as an officer from 1956 to 1959. The focus of his collection centered on World War I and World War II. The collection also includes books on the Revolutionary War, Civil War, Mexican War, Korean War, and Viet Nam War, among others. Regimental histories and books of detailed campaigns, military science, military equipment and biography predominate. The library is very fortunate to have such a magnificent research collection containing many rare, out of print and hard to find volumes. It should be of great interest to anyone exploring military history. To date, the complete collection has been processed and is available to the public in the Genealogy Department. Use the online catalog at http://www.irclibrary.org or browse the list below. Title Author Publ Date 106th Cavalry Group in Europe J. P. Himmer Co. 1945 10th Royal Hussars in the Second World War 1939-45 Dawnay, D., etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • The Combat Effectiveness of Australian and American Infantry Battalions in Papua in 1942-1943 Bryce Michael Fraser University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2013 The combat effectiveness of Australian and American infantry battalions in Papua in 1942-1943 Bryce Michael Fraser University of Wollongong Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Faculty of Arts School of History and Politics The combat effectiveness of Australian and American infantry battalions in Papua in 1942-1943 Bryce Michael Fraser, BA. This thesis is presented as the requirement for the Award of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Wollongong March 2013 CERTIFICATION I, Bryce Michael Fraser, declare that this thesis, submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Department of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. B M Fraser 25 March 2013 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES iv ABBREVIATIONS vii ABSTRACT viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS x Introduction: 1 Chapter 1: Theory and methodology 13 Chapter 2: The campaign and the armies in Papua 53 Chapter 3: Review of literature and sources 75 Chapter 4 : The combat readiness of the battalions in the 14th Brigade 99 Chapter 5: Reinterpreting the site and the narrative of the battle of Ioribaiwa 135 Chapter 6: Ioribaiwa battle analysis 185 Chapter 7: Introduction to the Sanananda road 211 Chapter 8: American and Australian infantry battalions in attacks at the South West Sector on the Sanananda road 249 Chapter 9: Australian Militia and AIF battalions in the attacks at the South West Sector on the Sanananda road.
    [Show full text]
  • 55Th/53Rd Australian Infantry Battalion
    55TH/53RD AUSTRALIAN INFANTRY BATTALION In honour of those who served LEST WE FORGET - 1 - - 2 - Produced for Saturday, 2 December 2017 by the 55th/53rd Battalion Association on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the Sanananda campaign honouring those who served in the 55th/53rd Australian Infantry Battalion. SOUTH WEST PACIFIC AREA 1939 - 1946 PAPUA AND NEW GUINEA 1942 – 43 Port Moresby – Milne Bay – Kokoda Track – Sanananda – Gona BOUGAINVILLE 1944 – 1945 Pearl Ridge – Soraken Plantation NEW BRITAIN 1945 – 1946 Rabaul All effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this document, but you may have information that can be added. If so, please contact a member of the 55th/53rd Battalion Association. (REVISED MARCH 2018) - 3 - We are pleased to welcome you and present to you this booklet at the 2017 anniversary luncheon of the 55th/53rd Battalion Association. Today we celebrate all veterans of the 55th/53rd Australian Infantry Battalion and commemorate their achievements at Sanananda on the 75th anniversary of the battle that commenced on 7 December 1942. The soldiers that served in the Battalion volunteered for service from all over Australia, from varied walks of life, and from other nations. Together they reinforced that wonderful Aussie concept of mateship. They have our eternal gratitude for their courage, spirit and dedication in serving Australia and keeping our country a safe and free nation - a legacy that we so gratefully continue to enjoy today. There have been many commemorative re-unions over past years but we trust that this one today will be notable for you through its solemnity at the Cenotaph and the contribution of our special guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Xi1 Australia Doubles the A.I.F
    CHAPTER XI1 AUSTRALIA DOUBLES THE A.I.F. THEAustralians and New Zealanders who returned from Gallipoli to Egypt were a different force from the adven- turous body that had left Egypt eight months before. They were a military force with strongly established, definite traditions. Not for anything, if he could avoid it, would an Australian now change his loose, faded tu& or battered hat for the smartest cloth or headgear of any other army. Men clung to their Australian uniforms till they were tattered to the limit of decency. Each of the regimental numbers which eight months before had been merely numbers, now carried a poignant meaning for every man serving with the A.I.F., and to some extent even for the nation far away in Australia. The ist, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Infantry Battalions-they had rushed Lone Pine; the 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th had made that swift advance at Helles; the gth, ioth, I ith, 12th had stormed the Anzac heights; the igth, iqth, igth, 16th had first held Quinn’s, Courtney’s and Pope’s; the battalion numbers of the 2nd Division were becoming equally famous-and so with the light horse, artillery, engineers, field ambulances, transport companies, and casualty clearing stations. Service on the Gallipoli beaches had given a fighting record even to British, Egyptian and Maltese labour units that normally would have served far behind the front. The troops from Gallipoli were urgently desired by Kitchener for the defence of Egypt against the Turkish expedition that threatened to descend on it as soon as the Allies’ evacuation had released the Turkish army ANZAC TO AMIENS [Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Warriors Walk Heritage Trail Wellington City Council
    crematoriumchapel RANCE COLUMBARIUM WALL ROSEHAUGH AVENUE SE AFORTH TERRACE Wellington City Council Introduction Karori Cemetery Servicemen’s Section Karori Serviceman’s Cemetery was established in 1916 by the Wellington City Council, the fi rst and largest such cemetery to be established in New Zealand. Other local councils followed suit, setting aside specifi c areas so that each of the dead would be commemorated individually, the memorial would be permanent and uniform, and there would be no distinction made on the basis of military or civil rank, race or creed. Unlike other countries, interment is not restricted to those who died on active service but is open to all war veterans. First contingent leaving Karori for the South African War in 1899. (ATL F-0915-1/4-MNZ) 1 wellington’s warriors walk heritage trail Wellington City Council The Impact of Wars on New Zealand New Zealanders Killed in Action The fi rst major external confl ict in which New Zealand was South African War 1899–1902 230 involved was the South African War, when New Zealand forces World War I 1914–1918 18,166 fought alongside British troops in South Africa between 1899 and 1902. World War II 1939–1945 11,625 In the fi rst decades of the 20th century, the majority of New Zealanders Died in Operational New Zealand’s population of about one million was of British descent. They identifi ed themselves as Britons and spoke of Services Britain as the ‘Motherland’ or ‘Home’. Korean War 1950–1953 43 New Zealand sent an expeditionary force to the aid of the Malaya/Malaysia 1948–1966 20 ‘Mother Country’ at the outbreak of war on 4 August 1914.
    [Show full text]