DOCSLIB.ORG

Implementing the Yokoyama Strategy and P'lan of Action, Pacific Islands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Disclaimer The mention of products, technologies, companies does not imply recommendation or endorsement by SOPAC, neither does it imply that these are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Published by South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC) December 2004 Cover Photo: Celebrating World Disaster Reduction Day in Honiara, Solomon Islands 2003 Co-sponsored by: 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .............................................................................................................................. 4 PACIFIC REGIONAL MAP ........................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 8 Lessons Learned.......................................................................................................... 11 PART I: THE REGION....................................................................................................15 CHAPTER 1: THE PACIFIC ISLANDS REGION................................................................... 16 Summary Of Key Statistics Relating To Regional Countries. ..................................... 20 CHAPTER 2: THE HAZARD AND RISK ENVIRONMENT .................................................... 22 Disasters In The Pacific Is lands Region 1994-2004 ................................................... 31 CHAPTER 3: REGIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT ........................................................ 36 PART II: PACIFIC ISLAND COUNTRIES............................................................43 CHAPTER 4: NATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES IN PACIFIC ISLAND COUNTRIES................................................................................................ 44 CHAPTER 5: DISASTER REDUCTION IN PACIFIC ISLAND COUNTRIES....................... 49 CHAPTER 6: DISASTER PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY DEVELOPMENT IN PACIFIC ISLAND COUNTRIES............................................... 59 PART III: NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA ...................................... 65 CHAPTER 7: NEW ZEALAND DISASTER MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................ 66 CHAPTER 8: AUSTRALIAN DISASTER MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS AND ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................ 76 References.............................................................................................................................. 91 Annexes A Yokohama Strategy and Plan of Action for a Safer World ............................................92 B Aitutaki Declaration On Regional Security Cooperation............................................. 102 C “Biketawa” Declaration .............................................................................................. 104 D The United Nations Millennium Development Goals................................................... 106 E Extract From The Programme For Action For Small Island States............................. 108 F Extracts From The Johannesburg Declaration On Sustainable Development And Plan Of Implementation Of The World Summit On Sustainable Development.................... 110 G Pacific Questionnaires ............................................................................................... 114 H Disaster Management Support Projects In The Region 1994-2004 ............................. 123 I Pacific Region National Profiles................................................................................. 131 J List Of Abbreviations And Acronyms......................................................................... 139 K Useful Disaster Management Websites...................................................................... 141 3 FOREWORD The ten-year review of the implementation of the 1994 Yokohama Strategy and Plan of Action was undertaken by the SOPAC Secretariat as part of its regional mandate for disaster management coordination and as a contribution by the Pacific to the preparations for the Second World Conference on Disaster Reduction, which will be held in Kobe, Japan in January 2005. This conference is a milestone event to increase the profile of Disaster Risk Reduction in development planning and practice and therefore provides a unique opportunity for the Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS) to highlight to the global community the extreme vulnerability of the region in relation to the frequency and intensity of natural disasters and the disproportionately high economic, social and environmental consequences of these events. SOPAC, through its partnership with the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR) Secretariat, will continue to promote and support improvements to disaster risk reduction practices and in particular provide regional leadership to ensure the successful implementation of the agreed outcomes from the Second World Conference in Kobe to support the objectives of the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation and the Millennium Development Goals. This regional report provides a valuable reference point in relation to the progress of implementation of the agreed strategy and plan of action that was decided in Yokohama in1994 and we therefore encourage our member countries to consider the lessons that have been identified and to use them for improving future national disaster risk reduction practices. On behalf of SOPAC I would like to thank Joe Barr the review consultant and principal author of the report and the many agencies and individuals who willingly provided their time and resources as well as valuable information. Particular thanks also to the Australian Agency for International Development, the New Zealand Agency for International Development and Emergency Management Australia who generously funded and supported the development of this report and the ongoing preparations for the Kobe Conference. While much progress has been made since Yokohama, the 1995 Pacific Forum Leaders vision that “Vulnerability to the effects of natural hazards, environmental damage and other threats will be overcome” still remains a challenge for all Pacific Island Countries and one that we should strive to achieve through the development of improved national disaster risk reduction policies and programmes aimed at strengthening community resilience. Cristelle Pratt Director 4 PACIFIC REGIONAL MAP 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY When preparing for the 1994 World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction in Yokohama, the Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS) contributed to a regional report entitled “Natural Disaster Reduction in Pacific Island Countries”. This report was well received by participants in the conference and by the Secretariat to the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR). In preparation for the Second World Conference on Disaster Reduction to be held in Kobe, Japan in January 2005, it was decided to produce a similar report covering not only the Pacific SIDS but also Australia and New Zealand. Because of the difference between scale and structure of disaster management in the Pacific SIDS and Australia and New Zealand, the report has been prepared in three parts. Part I comprises Chapters 1 to 3 and gives a general overview of the region, its geography, demography and hazard setting as well as regional arrangements and responsibilities. Part II, which contains Chapters 4 to 6, describes the disaster management structures in island countries as well as the various reduction, preparedness, response, and recovery activities that take place in those countries. Part III provides a picture of arrangements in New Zealand (Chapter 7) and Australia (Chapter 8) respectively. A series of Annexes provide supplementary information. Review Methodology Visits to all of the sixteen countries in the region as well as the donor countries supporting their disaster management activities was impossible in the time available so two questionnaires were prepared, one for national authorities and one for donor and technical agencies that provided regional or specialised support. Copies of the questionnaires can be found in Annex G. The questionnaires were distributed; and to supplement the responses, visits were paid to national and regional organisations in Fiji, Samoa, New Zealand and Australia. An extensive range of statistics and documents, particularly those at the SOPAC Secretariat library were also referenced. The initial draft prepared as a result of this activity was presented at the First ISDR Kobe Preparatory Committee Meeting in Geneva in May 2004. A more developed draft was then presented at a Regional Stakeholder Planning Workshop in Fiji in June 2004 where further comment was elicited and some outstanding questionnaires were collected. A final working draft was prepared in September 2004 in time for the Second ISDR Kobe Preparatory Committee Meeting in Geneva in October 2004. Further comments were then taken into account and amendments incorporated in this final report. Terminology Used Throughout the region a variety of terms are used to define the subject matter of this report. The terms include: “disaster management”, “emergency management”, “disaster risk management” and “civil protection” (‘Protection
Recommended publications
  • Mainstreaming Adaptation to Climate Change Sofia Bettencourt, World Bank

    Mainstreaming Adaptation to Climate Change Sofia Bettencourt, World Bank

    Mainstreaming Adaptation to Climate Change in Pacific Island Economies Sofia Bettencourt, World Bank Pacific Islands Vulnerability is Rising... Event Year Country Losses ( US$ million) Cyclone Ofa 1990 Samoa 140 Cyclone Val 1991 Samoa 300 Typhoon Omar 1992 Guam 300 Cyclone Kina 1993 Fiji 140 Cyclone Martin 1997 Cook Islands 7.5 Cyclone Hina 1997 Tonga 14.5 Drought 1997 Regional >175 Cyclone Cora 1998 Tonga 56 Cyclone Dani 1999 Fiji 3.5 Sources: Campbell (1999) and World Bank (2000) The costs of extreme weather events in the 1990s exceeded US$1 billion Support Projects 2003 Adaptation Projects 2002 Donor Commitments are also rising… 2001 $4,000 Risk/Disaster Years $3,500 2000 Manag ement $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 1999 $1,500 $1,000 daptation Consultation, Fiji 2003 $500 $0 Commitments (US$’000) Commitments Source: Second High Level A Emerging Key Principles Merge adaptation and hazard management Treat adaptation as a major economic, social and environmental risk Mainstream adaptation into national economic planning House adaptation in a high-level coordinating Ministry Treat adaptation as a long-term process Involve communities and private sector Disseminate information to high-level decision makers and the public Strengthen regulations affecting vulnerability An Example of Mainstreaming The Kiribati Adaptation Program Kiribati Source: http://www.infoplease.com/atlas/country/kiribati.html Kiribati is one of the Most Vulnerable Countries in the World in its Physical Environment… The 33 atolls of Kiribati are less than 500-1,000 meters
  • National Hurricane Operations Plan

    National Hurricane Operations Plan

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH National Hurricane Operations Plan FCM-P12-2015 Washington, DC May 2015 THE INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH (ICMSSR) MR. DAVID McCARREN, CHAIR MR. PAUL FONTAINE Acting Federal Coordinator Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation MR. MARK BRUSBERG Department of Agriculture DR. JONATHAN M. BERKSON United States Coast Guard DR. LOUIS UCCELLINI Department of Homeland Security Department of Commerce DR. DAVID R. REIDMILLER MR. SCOTT LIVEZEY Department of State United States Navy Department of Defense DR. ROHIT MATHUR Environmental Protection Agency MR. RALPH STOFFLER United States Air Force DR. EDWARD CONNER Department of Defense Federal Emergency Management Agency Department of Homeland Security MR. RICKEY PETTY Department of Energy DR. RAMESH KAKAR National Aeronautics and Space MR. JOEL WALL Administration Science and Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security DR. PAUL B. SHEPSON National Science Foundation MR. JOHN VIMONT Department of the Interior MR. DONALD E. EICK National Transportation Safety Board MR. MARK KEHRLI Federal Highway Administration MR. SCOTT FLANDERS Department of Transportation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MR. MICHAEL C. CLARK Office of Management and Budget MR. MICHAEL BONADONNA, Secretariat Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research Cover Image NOAA GOES-13, 15 October 2014; Hurricane Gonzalo; Credit: NOAA Environmental Visualization Laboratory FEDERAL COORDINATOR FOR METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES AND SUPPORTING RESEARCH 1325 East-West Highway, Suite 7130 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301-628-0112 http://www.ofcm.gov/ NATIONAL HURRICANE OPERATIONS PLAN http://www.ofcm.gov/nhop/15/nhop15.htm FCM-P12-2015 Washington, D.C.
  • Social Policy in the Post-Crisis Context of Small Island Developing States: a Synthesis

    Social Policy in the Post-Crisis Context of Small Island Developing States: a Synthesis

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Perch, Leisa; Roy, Rathin Working Paper Social policy in the post-crisis context of small island developing states: A synthesis Working Paper, No. 67 Provided in Cooperation with: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) Suggested Citation: Perch, Leisa; Roy, Rathin (2010) : Social policy in the post-crisis context of small island developing states: A synthesis, Working Paper, No. 67, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG), Brasilia This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/71774 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in
  • 12. Status of the Coral Reefs in the South West Pacific

    12. Status of the Coral Reefs in the South West Pacific

    12. STATUS O F THE CORAL REE F S IN THE SOUTH WEST PAC I F I C : FIJI , NEW CALEDONIA , SAMOA , SOLOMON ISLANDS , TUVALU AND V ANUATU EDITORS : CH ERIE MORRIS AND KENNET H MA C KAY . CONTRIBUTIONS FROM : JOY C E AH LEONG , CLAIRE GARRGUE , NELLY KERE , BRUNO MANELE , TUPULAGA POULASI , JASON RAUBANI , MARIA SAPATU , SEBASTIEN SARRAMEGNA , HELEN SYKES , CH RISTOP H ER BARTLETT , SABRINA VIRLY , AND LAURENT WANTIEZ AB STRA C T zx Fiji, New Caledonia, Vanuatu, Solomon Islands, Samoa and Tuvalu report monitoring data for this report, with data from a broad range of observers (scientists, students, dive guides and communities); Nauru has not conducted recent monitoring; zx Coral cover has changed since the 2004 report due to effective management (positive), or local disturbances, coral predation and natural disasters (negative). Average coral cover at monitoring sites was 45% in Fiji; 27% in New Caledonia; 43% in Samoa; 30% in Solomon Islands; 65% in Tuvalu; and 26% in Vanuatu; zx Monitoring observations over 9–10 years in Fiji and New Caledonia indicate that these reefs have coped reasonably well with natural and human stressors without catastrophic changes; zx Densities of edible fish and invertebrates remained generally low (0–10/100m2) in 4 countries reflecting high subsistence and commercial fishing pressure. Butterflyfish, parrotfish, surgeonfish and damselfish were generally most dominant. High densities of parrotfish were reported from 4 countries; zx Socioeconomic monitoring is conducted in Fiji, Samoa and Solomon Islands. Greatest activity is by the Fiji Locally Marine Managed Area (FLMMA) network at 270 villages across all Fiji provinces.
  • Design Yearbook 2009 2009 a Glimpse Into Arup’S Creative World

    Design Yearbook 2009 2009 a Glimpse Into Arup’S Creative World

    A glimpse into Arup’s creative world creative A glimpse into Arup’s Design Yearbook 2009 2009 A glimpse into Arup’s creative world www.arup.com Foreword n Design is more than simply the Our design ideas push all kinds of creation of a project. Design is an boundaries. But in the end, our clients active, evolving, and increasingly measure the value of those ideas inclusive process. And more than only by the positive difference they ever, the design process carries with make to their businesses and to the it a responsibility. Good design has communities they work in. This edition the power to transform an idea into of the Yearbook gives you a taste of the something useful. richness and diversity of Arup’s design work in the last year, and how it helped Our fifth Design Yearbook takes our clients to succeed and to connect another glimpse into Arup’s creative communities in a rapidly changing world. world, where responsible design is at the core of what we do. We work Working responsibly across the built hard to ensure that our creativity, environment, we help to create a better innovation and technical excellence place in which we all can live. are relevant to the marketplace, to its current physical, social and economic context, and to the future. Foreword n Design is more than simply the Our design ideas push all kinds of creation of a project. Design is an boundaries. But in the end, our clients active, evolving, and increasingly measure the value of those ideas inclusive process.
  • Tropical Cyclone Risk and Impact Assessment Plan Final Feb2014.Pdf

    Tropical Cyclone Risk and Impact Assessment Plan Final Feb2014.Pdf

    © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 Published by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Tropical Cyclone Risk and Impact Assessment Plan Second Edition ISSN 2200-2049 ISBN 978-1-922126-34-4 Second Edition (pdf) This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without the prior written permission of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Director, Communications and Parliamentary 2-68 Flinders Street PO Box 1379 TOWNSVILLE QLD 4810 Australia Phone: (07) 4750 0700 Fax: (07) 4772 6093 [email protected] Comments and enquiries on this document are welcome and should be addressed to: Director, Ecosystem Conservation and Resilience [email protected] www.gbrmpa.gov.au ii Tropical Cyclone Risk and Impact Assessment Plan — GBRMPA Executive summary Waves generated by tropical cyclones can cause major physical damage to coral reef ecosystems. Tropical cyclones (cyclones) are natural meteorological events which cannot be prevented. However, the combination of their impacts and those of other stressors — such as poor water quality, crown-of-thorns starfish predation and warm ocean temperatures — can permanently damage reefs if recovery time is insufficient. In the short term, management response to a particular tropical cyclone may be warranted to promote recovery if critical resources are affected. Over the long term, using modelling and field surveys to assess the impacts of individual tropical cyclones as they occur will ensure that management of the Great Barrier Reef represents world best practice. This Tropical Cyclone Risk and Impact Assessment Plan was first developed by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) in April 2011 after tropical cyclone Yasi (one of the largest category 5 cyclones in Australia’s recorded history) crossed the Great Barrier Reef near Mission Beach in North Queensland.
  • A Case Study of Bellona Community in Solomon Islands

    A Case Study of Bellona Community in Solomon Islands

    VULNERABILITY AND IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON FOOD CROPS IN RAISED ATOLL COMMUNITIES: A CASE STUDY OF BELLONA COMMUNITY IN SOLOMON ISLANDS. by Joseph Maeke A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Climate Change. Copyright © 2013 by Joseph Maeke Pacific Centre for Environment and Sustainable Development (PACE-SD) Faculty of Science, Technology and Environment The University of the South Pacific July, 2013 DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY Statement by Author I, Joseph Maeke hereby declare that this thesis is the account of my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge; it contains no material previously published, or submitted for the award on any other degree or diploma at any tertiary institution, except where due acknowledgement or reference is made in the text. Signature: Date: 19th July 2013 Name: Joseph Maeke Student ID No: S01004381 Statement by Supervisor This research in this thesis is performed under my supervision and to my knowledge is the sole work of Mr. Joseph Maeke. Signature: Date: 19th July 2013 Name: Prof. Elisabeth Holland Designation: Principal Supervisor DEDICATION Dedicated to my best friend and wife, Samantha Annonna Maeke for the endless support from the initial stage of this thesis until its completion. Thank you ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This thesis would have not been possible without the scholarship and financial support of PACE-SD (Pacific Centre for Environment and Sustainable Development) through the AusAID Future Climate Leaders Project (FCLP) of which I am grateful. I am indebted to my initial principal supervisors Dr. Morgan Wairiu and Dr. Dan Orcherton who directed and advised me during the initial stage of the thesis until their departure from PACE-SD.
  • Comparative Analysis of Climate Change

    Comparative Analysis of Climate Change

    Competence Centre for Climate Change Climate Change Impact Chains in Coastal Areas (ICCA) Final study report The study “Climate Change Impact Chains in Coastal Areas”, produced by the Center for International Forestry Research, CIFOR, was commissioned by the Inventory of Methods for Adaptation to Climate Change (IMACC) project, a global project by the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammen­ arbeit (GIZ) GmbH, and funded through the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU). The project aims at user­driven application and advancement of existing tools and methods for adaptation, developing capacities for adaptation action and supporting South­to­South exchange, particularly among its seven partner countries: Grenada, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Philippines, Tunisia and South Africa. IMACC operates the platform AdaptationCommunity.net that provides intro­ duction to key topics of adaptation, examples of adaptation experiences and serves as an exchange and webinar platform. CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 4 1�1 Objectives of the study �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 1�2 Rationale for the study �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Tropical coastal areas ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 The impact
  • MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO Diploma Thesis

    MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO Diploma Thesis

    MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION Diploma thesis Brno 2018 Supervisor: Author: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Bc. Lukáš Opavský MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE Presentation Sentences in Wikipedia: FSP Analysis Diploma thesis Brno 2018 Supervisor: Author: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Bc. Lukáš Opavský Declaration I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. I agree with the placing of this thesis in the library of the Faculty of Education at the Masaryk University and with the access for academic purposes. Brno, 30th March 2018 …………………………………………. Bc. Lukáš Opavský Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. for his kind help and constant guidance throughout my work. Bc. Lukáš Opavský OPAVSKÝ, Lukáš. Presentation Sentences in Wikipedia: FSP Analysis; Diploma Thesis. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Education, English Language and Literature Department, 2018. XX p. Supervisor: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Annotation The purpose of this thesis is an analysis of a corpus comprising of opening sentences of articles collected from the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia. Four different quality categories from Wikipedia were chosen, from the total amount of eight, to ensure gathering of a representative sample, for each category there are fifty sentences, the total amount of the sentences altogether is, therefore, two hundred. The sentences will be analysed according to the Firabsian theory of functional sentence perspective in order to discriminate differences both between the quality categories and also within the categories.
  • Gladstone–Fitzroy Pipeline Project: Two Sources, One Scheme

    Gladstone–Fitzroy Pipeline Project: Two Sources, One Scheme

    GLADSTONE AREA WATER BOARD Gladstone–Fitzroy Pipeline Project: Two sources, one scheme The Gladstone-Fitzroy • A geographically spread scheme reduces • Operational staff can be part-time at the both hydrology and asset risks (e.g. proposed Water Treatment Plant when Pipeline project drought, flood, fire, cyclone, earthquake, control and monitoring systems are will interconnect terrorism, mechanical failure, power loss, integrated, significantly reducing costs seamlessly with GAWB’s dam safety) and resourcing difficulties and improving workforce efficiency existing assets, with • With one scheme, smeared prices keep the region attractive for current and • Water quality will be comparable from either many efficiencies future users source and quality control, monitoring and notifications to maximise customers’ output flowing as a result • Tens of millions of dollars can be saved efficiency is possible in one scheme because a new Aldoga storage would need to be four times the size if there was no • Optimisation of the whole operations, under integrated backup from Lake Awoonga GAWB’s advanced commercial frameworks, will provide the best outcome for the region. Securing the Region’s Water Supply GAWB’s Strategic The Gladstone region has sufficient Having prepared for the Gladstone-Fitzroy Water Plan water for the next few years. However Pipeline in recent years – locating a preferred low inflows to Lake Awoonga after corridor, designing the pipeline and gaining GAWB’s 2004 Strategic Water Plan (SWP) 2003’s drought-breaking Cyclone Beni appropriate Government approvals – GAWB was a collaborative effort between GAWB, and strong industrial growth signalled is ready to commence construction of the government, industry and the community a need to pursue a second source of pipeline as soon as low water levels in Lake and set out GAWB’s strategic options to water to secure a reliable, long-term Awoonga or increased demand trigger the best meet the region’s water needs.
  • Moderating the Impact of Climate Change

    Moderating the Impact of Climate Change

    Cities, Seas, and Storms Managing Change in Pacific Island Public Disclosure Authorized Economies Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Volume IV Adapting to Climate Change November 30, 2000 PAPUA NEW GUINEA AND PACIFIC ISLANDS COUNTRY UNIT • THE WORLD BANK in collaboration with Public Disclosure Authorized Environment and Conservation Division ·I·G·C·I· SPREP Kiribati PICCAP Copyright © 2000 The International Bank for Reconstruction And Development/ THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing November 13, 2000 Second printing November 30, 2000 World Bank Country Study Reports are among the many reports originally prepared for internal use as part of the continuing analysis by the Bank of the economic and related conditions of its developing member countries and of its dialogues with the governments. Some of the reports are published in this series with the least possible delay of the use of the governments and the academic, business and financial, and development communities. The typescript of this paper therefore has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts, and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
  • Fiji and Disasters References by Kirstie Méheux Kirstiemeheux@Hotmail.Com 16 September 2007 Available From

    Fiji and Disasters References by Kirstie Méheux [email protected] 16 September 2007 Available From

    Fiji and Disasters References By Kirstie Méheux [email protected] 16 September 2007 Available from http://www.islandvulnerability.org/fijirefs.pdf This is a list of texts which I have come across in the course of my PhD research (see http://www.islandvulnerability.org/fiji.html#meheuxphd ). The texts are predominantly related to disasters in Fiji, however, there are a few which have a broader Pacific-wide focus. I have also included a few texts that focus on climate change in the Pacific. Benson, C. (1997) The economic impact of natural disasters in the Fiji. Overseas Development Institute Working Paper, Working Paper 97, Overseas Development Institute, London. Brookfield, H. C. (1977) The Hurricane Hazard Natural disaster and small populations. UNESCO/UNFPA MAB (Series: Population and Environment Project in the Eastern Islands of Fiji). Campbell, J. (1994) Disaster Losses in the Pacific: Are They Increasing? In, The South Pacific Regional Disaster Housing Conference held Lae, Papua New Guinea, Campbell, J. (1999) Pacific Island vulnerabilities towards the end of the twentieth century. In, Ingleton, J. (Ed.) Natural Disaster Management: A presentation to commemorate the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR) 1990-2000, Tudor Rose, Leicester, 320. Campbell, J. R. (1984) Dealing with Disaster: Hurricane Response in Fiji. Pacific Islands Development Program, East-West Centre, Honolulu. Campbell, J. R. (2006) Traditional disaster-reduction in Pacific Island communities. GNS Science Report, 206/038, GNS Science, Campbell, J. R. and Chung, J. (1986) Post-Disaster Assessment: A. Management. East- West Center, Honolulu. Campbell, J. R. and Chung, J. (1986) Post-Disaster Assessment: B. Field Survey.