<<

arXiv:2101.11528v1 [physics.app-ph] 27 Jan 2021 K h apeudrsuyi lcdi h eino nfr mi- uniform a of region the in placed is study under sample The plasmo surface as interface the at propagate either can They DP)dw o1 .I section In K. 10 to down (DPPH) ER n eae esrmns rvosy SPmodes LSSP Previously, measurements. related and (ESR) ea n ilcrcitraea pia rqece [ frequencies on optical exist at which interface waves and electromagnetic metal are Surface I 1 edi o iesoa systems. Rashb dimensional microwave low a in by field caused transitions ESR resona of designed detection the the of application potential the on cussion lin microstrip a by excited CMSS a [ of consisting resonator, a [ spi- (CMSS) metallic complementary structure a ral on generated samp be the can of modes position LSSP the at generation field magnetic crowave [ onators an of [ presence systems the paramagnetic in in field levels magnetic tran- Zeeman cause between external radiation electrons microwave of resonant sition a when occurs ESR field strong show (LSSPs) [ plasmons confinement spoof surface as spoof known localized are and [ plasmons plasmons, featur surface surface have original which to frequencies, similar low at waves surface support surfac localized of form the [ in (LSPs) resonant plasmons be can or ae icsin h td scnlddi section in concluded is study The i discussion. done lated is spectra descriptio ESR Elaborate recording section for provided. setup low-temperature been of has resonator LSSP 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydraz the of spectra resonator ESR fabricated record the and to simulated, used been has resonator ie nti okfrtedtcino lcrnsi resonan spin electron of detection the for work this in lized snal efc lcrccnutr hc rvn h exc [ the modes prevent surface which these of conductors tion beha electric metals perfect frequencies, nearly terahertz as and microwave at as such rwv antcfil,otooa oteZea edt caus to [ field transitions Zeeman ESR the to orthogonal field, magnetic crowave aebe sdfrsnigproe ny[ only purposes sensing for used been have 13 eywords a enue nti okfrdtcino S.TeLSSP The ESR. of detection for work this in used been has ] D ntroduction tcino lcrnsi eoac onto down spin electron of etection 3 17 ahafil-rvneeto pnrsnnehsbe discus been has app resonance Potential spin K. electron 10 par field-driven to standard down Rashba resonator a this of using recorded spectra are resonance spin Electron analyzed. ealcsia tutr,ece ntegon ln fami a of plane ground the i o mode on 50 profile The etched structure, field reported. spiral being electromagnetic metallic is the resonance of spin electron use detect novel study, this In olwdb section by followed , n lnrrsntr [ resonators planar and ] oaie po ufc Surface Spoof Localized Ω h hnei hrceitc ftemd fitrs ihl with interest of mode the of characteristics in change The . 10 eateto hsclSine,Ida nttt fScien of Institute Indian Sciences, Physical of Department ],[ 15 11 7 .S a,cvt eoaos[ resonators cavity far, So ]. 4 ],[ ],[ .Ti rpryo SP a enuti- been has LSSPs of property This ]. 8 19 5 ],[ .Hwvr tlwfeunyrange low-frequency at However, ]. ],[ 9 .Smlrt h rgnlLP,the LSPs, original the to Similar ]. 20 uhdpRy,Aua ad rnyDs,adCiajbMitra Chiranjib and , Das Pronoy , Nandi Anuvab , Roy Subhadip 6 .Ptendmtli ufcscan surfaces metallic Patterned ]. .A SPmd upre on supported mode LSSP An ]. 4 otiigterslsadre- and results the containing 18 2 ealddsrpinof description detailed , aebe sdfrmi- for used been have ] 12 *correspondence: po ufc plasmon surface spoof ],[ · 16 opeetr ealcSia Structure Spiral Metallic Complementary P 13 reprint ,lme res- lumped ], ]. 5 ihadis- a with , 1 ],[ , 2 compiled o in tor ],[ A 14 ita- le. bstract ve 3 [email protected] ce es yl is n n n a e e e ]. ]. hc xie h SPmds orsia i lt fwidth of slots air spiral Four modes. LSSP the excites which h oaie po ufc lsoi eoao (LSSPR) Resonator Plasmonic Surface Spoof Localized The iainfco f002 enda 0Gz 17.5 A GHz. 10 di a at and defined mm 0.0023 1.5 of of thickness factor a for sipation 10.7 of constant process dielectric a the in [ used AD1000 laminate is microwave The software. MWS) oprlyri rsn nbt ie ftedeeti.I th In is dielectric. copper the of 5.96 of conductivity as sides electrical both the setup, on simulation present is layer copper S W.Feunydmi ovrwt pn(d space) (add open with solver Frequency-domain MWS. CST sub- in indicated dimensions having section LSSPR the of Simulation T 2 . Simulation 2.2 The marked. (b) dimensions with ports. plane excitation ground with the along on located LSSPR CMSS The (a) 1: Figure respectively. CMSS, the rnmsinln ln ihcnutn rc nteohrs = other the microstrip on a trace of conducting plane with ground along the line on transmission etched CMSS a comprises Geometry 2.1 daetso rp . ie ofr h MSsrcuewith structure CMSS the form to radius outer times 1.5 wraps slot adjacent a width a has si meac.Figures impedance. istic A .4m n aigaseparation a having and mm 0.24 sed. pril a) mgei ape 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, sample, amagnetic iaino h oei h eeto fmicrowave of detection the in mode the of lication rsrpln aigacaatrsi meac of impedance characteristic a having line crostrip upre narsntrwt complementary a with resonator a on supported s R oaie po ufc lsoi oeto mode plasmonic surface spoof localized a f he esonator eEuainadRsac okt,India. Kolkata, Research and Education ce × wrn ftmeauehsbe bevdand observed been has temperature of owering ,2021 1, 2.1 10 L ocalized b 7 R 21 scridoti S irwv tdo(CST Studio Microwave CST in out carried is Port 2 S = = Rgr oprto,UA.Telmnt has laminate The USA). Corporation, (Rogers ] / ,wihi h r-endvleaalbein available value pre-defined the is which m, . m hc orsod o50 to corresponds which mm, 1.2 .8m.Tesga rc nteopst face opposite the on trace signal The mm. 2.88 & Fabrication b 0K 10 Port 1 S · poof lcrnSi Resonance Spin Electron 1 a b lutaeteLSRand LSSPR the illustrate (b) & (a) S sn localized using urface * s = b) 200 200 . mwt epc to respect with mm 0.2 ¡ P m lasmonic R s Ω character- µ w thick m taken --- ide w s- e Preprint –Detection of electron spin resonance down to 10 K using localized spoof 2 boundary condition on the ground plane side and open bound- 3 Application of the LSSPR in detection of ary condition on all other sides of the structure has been used electron spin resonance down to 10 K while running the simulation. The fabrication of the structure is carried out using a rapid pro- The LSSP mode M2 resonating at 3.46 GHz (measured) as totyping process employing optical lithography [22] followed shown in figure 3 is chosen for the application in the detec- by wet etching [23]. SMA connectors are soldered at either end tion of electron spin resonance. A uniform magnetic field is of the conducting trace for the propagation of microwave signal. obtained in the central part of the resonator as shown in figure The fabricated LSSPR with the CMSS on the ground plane and 4. the signal trace are shown in figures 2 (a) & (b) respectively.

a) b)

Figure 4: Cross-sectional view of the simulated microwave yz Figure 2: (a) The CMSS structure after fabrication. (b) The magnetic field distribution in the plane. signal trace with SMA connectors soldered on it.

The Zeeman field B0 is applied along the x-direction as shown in figure 5. Hence the magnitude of the component of the mi- 2.3 Characterization crowave magnetic field perpendicular to B0 is given by |B⊥| = The LSSPR is characterized by measuring its transmission |B |2 + |B |2. Figures 5 and 6 show the distribution of |B | spectrum and comparing it with the simulated result. The q 1z 1y ⊥ measurement is carried out using a Vector Network Analyzer and the electric field just above the CMSS structure, respec- (VNA) (ZVA 24, Rohde & Schwarz). The VNA is calibrated tively. using through, open, short and match (TOSM) standards before performing the measurements. Figure 3 compares the measured response (black) with the simulated one (red). The deviation between the two responses may be attributed to the tolerance of the fabrication process. In the 2-4 GHz frequency range, the transmission spectrum shows two dips marked as M1 & M2 which are the two fundamental LSSP resonance modes. M1 is the magnetic LSSP mode and M2 is the electrical LSSP mode [13],[19].

B0

Figure 5: Distribution of |B⊥| just above the CMSS structure. 0 The direction of B0 along x-axis is indicated.

-5

M M

1 1

-10 (dB)

-15 21 Measured S

Simulated

-20

M

2

-25

M

2

2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

Frequency (GHz)

Figure 3: Comparison of the simulated (red) & measured Figure 6: Distribution of the electric field just above the CMSS (black) transmission spectra of the LSSPR in 2-4 GHz range. structure.

Temperature variation of the M2 mode’s properties is investi- gated by mounting the LSSPR inside a closed-cycle cryogen- free cryostat (OptistatDry BLV, Oxford Instruments) on a cus- tom designed copper holder attached to the cold head. The Preprint –Detection of electron spin resonance down to 10 K using localized spoof surface plasmon 3 stability of temperature during measurements is maintained by The cryostat loaded with the sample is placed between the pole using a temperature controller (MercuryiTC, Oxford Instru- pieces of an electromagnet (3473-70, GMW). The electromag- ments). The LSSPR is attached to a dielectric spacer for elec- net provides the external Zeeman field. The VNA connected trical insulation which in turn is stuck to the holder. Apiezon to the LSSPR acts as the source and detector of microwaves. N grease and a cyanoacrylate adhesive are used to provide ther- It is set to have a measurement bandwidth of 1 MHz with a mal contact and mechanical stability respectively. The arrange- frequency step size of 500 kHz. An averaging factor of 25 ment is depicted in Figure 7. Hand formable microwave cables with 15 dBm port power is used for recording the ESR spec- (086-2SM+, Mini-Circuits) connect the LSSPR to the VNA via tra. The programmable power supply (SGA60X83D, Sorensen) hermetically sealed adapters (PE9184, Pasternack) fitted to the connected to the electromagnet, and the VNA are interfaced us- cryostat body. TOSM calibration is performed at room temper- ing a Python script. Temperature is manually set on the tem- ature before the commencement of measurement at low temper- perature controller before recording an ESR spectrum. The atures. schematic of the low temperature ESR setup is shown in figure 9.

Cryostat Temperature Controller Cold Head

Power Supply S N B0 Copper holder Personal

Computer++ V.N.A. Resonator

Dielectric Figure 9: Schematic of the low temperature ESR setup Spacer Flexible SMA cable 4 Results &Discussion

The temperature evolution of M2 mode for the empty LSSPR is plotted in figure 10. The shift of the resonant frequency (fres) and the variation in the loaded quality factor (Q-factor) of the M2 mode for the empty LSSPR with temperature are shown in figure 11. The Q-factor is calculated using the relation, Q- fres factor = , where ∆ f3dB is the bandwidth at +3dB above Figure 7: The mounted empty LSSPR inside the cryostat. ∆ f3dB the minimum forward transmission coefficient S21 value which occurs at fres [24],[25],[26]. Continuous wave electron spin resonance spectroscopy is per- formedon 4mg of DPPH sample at different temperature values in the 10 K to 295 K temperature range. The powder sample is wrapped in teflon tape and is affixed on the CMSS structure with the help of Apiezon N grease. It is placed on the central 0 part of the resonator as the microwave magnetic field is uniform -5 there. Figure 8 shows the sample location on the LSSPR. 10 K

25 K

-10

50 K

75 K

-15 100 K 21(dB)

125 K S

150 K

-20

175 K

200 K 295 K

-25 225 K

250 K

275 K

-30

295 K 10 K

3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7

Frequency (GHz)

Figure 8: Location of the sample on the LSSPR Figure 10: Temperature evolution of M2 mode for the empty LSSPR. Preprint –Detection of electron spin resonance down to 10 K using localized spoof surface plasmon 4

The change in the transmission dip of the M2 mode as a func- tion of externally swept B0 is recorded for obtaining the ESR

3.46 spectrum at different temperature values. The recorded ESR 400 spectra at 10 K and room temperature along with a fit to a 3.45 Lorentzian is shown in figure 13.

350

3.44

300 3.43 (a) (b) (GHz)

f res

3.42

250

Q-factor res f

3.41

200 Q-factor(arb. units)

3.40

150

3.39

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Temperature (K) Figure 13: ESR signal fitted by a Lorentzian curve (red) Figure 11: Change in the resonant frequency, fres (black) and recorded at (a) 10 K (b) 295 K (room temperature) Q-factor (red) with temperature for the empty LSSPR. The g-factor and ESR line width [30] are measured & plotted A shift of 67 MHz is observed in fres at 10 K in comparison to for different temperature values as shown in figure 14 (a) & its value at 295 K. Thermal contraction and change in dielec- (b) respectively. The measured values of the g-factor and line tric properties of the microwave laminate [21] can qualitatively width of the DPPH sample show satisfactory agreement with explain this shift [27],[28],[29]. The value of the Q-factor the values reported in the literature [31]. reaches a maximum of 386 at 75 K after which it decreases slightly down to 10 K. The enhancement in Q-factor at low temperature can be attributed to the reduction in resistive power loss [29]. Figure 12 shows the temperature evolution of the M2 mode af- ter placement of the DPPH sample. In comparison to figure 10, after placement of the sample, fres shifts to lower values for the entire measurement temperature range (10 K-295 K). The dielectric property of the teflon wrapped sample perturbs the electric field (figure 6) on the CMSS [19] leading to the shift in f values at different temperatures. res Figure 14: Measured (a) g-factor & (b) ESR line width at dif- ferent temperature values.

The signal to noise ratio (SNR) [32],[33]isaround46at10K& 0 34 at 295 K. Spin sensitivity [34],[35] is about1016 spins/gauss

-5 for the sample used with a measured ESR line width of 3.36 G

10 K at 10 K. The LSSPR based ESR spectrometer has SNR value

-10 25 K which is one order lower than the spectrometers developed

50 K by us [22],[23] that utilize planar transmission line based res- (dB)

-15

75 K

21 onators in reflection geometry and consequently has spin sensi- S 100 K tivity value which is one order higher.

-20

295 K

150 K

200 K -25 5 Conclusion 250 K

-30 295 K 10 K The LSSPR has been successfully fabricated using a rapid pro- totyping technique, resulting in a good agreement between the 3.2 3.4 3.6 measured and simulated responses. Temperature evolution of Frequency (GHz) the used LSSP mode has been shown and explained. Estimated values of the g-factor and line width show good agreement with Figure 12: Temperature evolution of M2 mode for the LSSPR previously reported values. This is the first study to the best of loaded with sample. our knowledge, where the magnetic field of an LSSP mode has been used to detect ESR spectra of a paramagnetic sample. The simultaneous confinement of microwave electric and mag- netic fields in the M2 mode can make detection of ESR sig- Preprint –Detection of electron spin resonance down to 10 K using localized spoof surface plasmon 5 nal from materials having high dielectric loss challenging [29]. Y., "Terahertz on-chip sensing by exciting higher radial order However, this feature can enable one to observe the effects of spoof localized surface plasmons." Applied Physics Express, Zeeman field and Rashba field in the same ESR spectrum. The 13(1), 012014(2019). microwave electric field induces a microwave Rashba field in [13] Xie, Z., Wang, G., Sun, L., Li, Y., & Cao, R. "Localised low symmetry systems (1D & 2D samples) which can give rise spoof surface plasmon-based sensor for omni-directional to ESR transition apart from the conventional ESR transitions cracks detection in metal surfaces." IET Microwaves, An- caused by microwave magnetic field [36],[37]. tennas & Propagation, 13(12), 2061-2066(2019). [14] Brustolon, M., Giamello, E. "Electron Paramagnetic Res- Acknowledgements onance - A Practioner’s Toolkit." (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009) The authors gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Education [15] Miksch, B., Dressel, M., & Scheffler, M. "Cryogenic (MoE), Government of India & Science and Engineering Re- frequency-domain electron spin resonance spectrometer search Board (SERB) (grant no.- EMR/2016/007950) for fund- based on coplanar waveguides and field modulation." Re- ing this work. S. R. acknowledges Council of Scientific & In- view of Scientific Instruments, 91(2), 025106(2020). dustrial Research (CSIR), India for research fellowship. The au- thors thank Prof. Bhaskar Gupta, Department of Electronics & [16] Mett, R. R., & Hyde, J. S. "Microwave leakage from first- Telecommunication Engineering, Jadavpur University for pro- field modulation slots in TE 011 electron paramagnetic res- viding simulation facilities. The authors are grateful to Roger onance cavities." Review of Scientific Instruments, 76(1), Corporation, USA, for the microwave laminate samples. 014702(2005). [17] Froncisz, W., & Hyde, J. S. "The loop-gap resonator: a new microwave lumped circuit ESR sample structure." Jour- References nal of Magnetic Resonance (1969), 47(3), 515-521(1982). [1] Visser, T. D. "Surface plasmons at work?." Nature Physics, [18] Narkowicz, R., Suter, D., & Stonies, R. "Planar microres- 2(8), 509-510(2006). onators for EPR experiments." Journal of Magnetic Reso- nance, 175(2), 275-284(2005). [2] Raether, H. “Surface Plasmons on Smooth and Rough Sur- faces and on Gratings.” (Springer, Berlin, 1988). [19] Gao, Z., Gao, F., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, B. "Complementary structure for designer localized surface plasmons." Applied [3] Barnes, W., Dereux, A. & Ebbesen, T. "Surface plasmon Physics Letters, 107(19), 191103(2015). subwavelength optics." Nature, 424, 824–830 (2003). [20] Gao, Z., Gao, F., & Zhang, B. "High-order spoof local- [4] Yu, H., Peng, Y., Yang, Y., & Li, Z. Y. "Plasmon-enhanced ized surface plasmons supported on a complementary metal- light– interactions and applications." npj Computa- lic spiral structure." Scientific Reports, 6, 24447(2016). tional Materials, 5(1), 1-14(2019). [21] Rogers Corporation, AD1000 data sheet, [5] Maier, S.A. "Plasmonics: Fundamentals and applications." https://rogerscorp.com/-/media/project/rogerscorp/documents/advanced- (Springer, New York, 2007). connectivity-solutions/english/data-sheets/ad1000-data- [6] Hibbins, A. P., Evans, B. R., & Sambles, J. R. "Experimen- sheet.pdf . tal verification of designer surface plasmons." Science, 308 [22] Roy, S., Saha, S., Sarkar, J., & Mitra, C. "Development (5722), 670-672(2005). of planar microstrip resonators for electron spin resonance [7] Huidobro, P. A., Shen, X., Cuerda, J., Moreno, E., Martin- spectroscopy." European Physical Journal Applied Physics Moreno, L., Garcia-Vidal, F. J., Cui, T.J. & Pendry, J. B. 90(3), 31001(2020). "Magnetic localized surface plasmons." Physical Review X, [23] Roy, S., Nandi, A., Das, P., & Mitra, C. "S-band electron 4(2), 021003(2014). spin resonance spectroscopy using a short-circuited coplanar [8] Pors, A., Moreno, E., Martin-Moreno, L., Pendry, J. B., waveguide resonator." IOPSciNotes 1(3), 035202(2020). & Garcia-Vidal, F. J. "Localized spoof plasmons arise while [24] Melik, R., Perkgoz, N. K., Unal, E., Dilli, Z., & Demir, H. texturing closed surfaces." Physical Review Letters, 108(22), V. "Design and Realization of a Fully On-Chip High-Q Res- 223905(2012). onator at 15 GHz on Silicon." IEEE Transactions on Elec- tron Devices, 55(12), 3459-3466(2008). [9] Pendry, J. B., Martin-Moreno, L., & Garcia-Vidal, F. J. "Mimicking surface plasmons with structured surfaces." Sci- [25] Li, H., Wang, Y., Wei, L., Zhou, P., Wei, Q., Cao, C., Fang, ence, 305(5685), 847-848(2004). Y., Yu, Y. & Wu, P. "Experimental demonstrations of high- Q superconductingcoplanar waveguide resonators." Chinese [10] Zayats, A. V., & Smolyaninov, I. I. "Near-field photon- Science Bulletin, 58(20), 2413-2417(2013). ics: surface plasmon polaritons and localized surface plas- mons." Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics, 5(4), [26] Rusni, I. M., Ismail, A., Alhawari, A. R. H., Hamidon, M. S16(2003). N., & Yusof, N. A. "An aligned-gap and centered-gap rect- angular multiple split ring resonator for dielectric sensing [11] Li, Z., Xu, B., Gu, C., Ning, P., Liu, L., Niu, Z., & Zhao, applications." Sensors, 14(7), 13134-13148(2014). Y. "Localized spoof plasmons in closed textured cavities." Applied Physics Letters, 104(25), 251601(2014). [27] Narkowicz, R., Suter, D., & Niemeyer, I. "Scaling of sen- sitivity and efficiency in planar microresonators for electron [12] Zhou, J., Chen, L., Sun, Q., Liao, D., Ding, L., Balakin, spin resonance." Review of Scientific Instruments, 79(8), A.V., Shkurinov, A.P., Xie, J., Zang, X., Cheng, Q. and Zhu, 084702(2008). Preprint –Detection of electron spin resonance down to 10 K using localized spoof surface plasmon 6

[28] Rahim, M.J., Lehleiter, T., Bothner, D., Krellner, C., Koelle, D., Kleiner, R., Dressel, M. and Schef- fler, M., "Metallic coplanar resonators optimized for low- temperature measurements." Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 49(39), 395501(2016). [29] Abhyankar, N., Agrawal, A., Shrestha, P., Maier, R., McMichael, R. D., Campbell, J., & Szalai, V. "Scalable microresonators for room-temperature detection of electron spin resonance from dilute, sub-nanoliter volume ." Science Advances, 6(44), eabb0620(2020). [30] Fujita, N., Matsumoto, D., Sakurai, Y., Kawahara, K., Ago, H., Takenobu, T., & Marumoto, K. " Direct observa- tion of electrically induced Pauli paramagnetism in single- layer graphene using ESR spectroscopy." Scientific Reports, 6, 34966(2016). [31] Poole, C. P. "Electron Spin Resonance: A Comprehensive Treatise on Experimental Techniques." (Dover Publications, NY, 1996). [32] Nakaoka, R., & Hirata, H. "Noise characteristics of a 750-MHz electronically tunable resonator for electron para- magnetic resonance spectroscopy." AIP Advances, 9(7), 075312(2019). [33] Kiss, S.Z., Rostas, A.M., Heidinger, L., Spengler, N., Meissner, M.V., MacKinnon, N., Schleicher, E., Weber, S. and Korvink, J.G. "A microwave resonator integrated on a microfluidic chip." Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 270, 169-175(2016). [34] Assenheim, H. M. "Introduction to Electron Spin Res- onance." (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, Berlin, 2013). [35] Slifkin, M. A., & Suleiman, Y. M. "The use of DPPH as a standard for the measurement of G-values." Radiation Ef- fects, 27(1-2), 111-112(1975). [36] Wilamowski, Z., Solnica, M., Michaluk, E., Havlicek, M., & Jantsch, W. "EPR line shape and magnetometry—chances and pitfalls." Science and Technology, 26(6), 064009(2011). [37] Schulte, M., Lok, J. G. S., Denninger, G., & Dietsche, W. "Electron spin resonance on a two-dimensional electron in a single AlAs quantum well." Physical Review Letters, 94(13), 137601(2005).