From Prodigy to Pathology: "Monstrosity" in the British Novel from 1850 to 1930
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2013 From Prodigy to Pathology: "Monstrosity" in the British Novel from 1850 to 1930 Terri Beth Miller University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Terri Beth, "From Prodigy to Pathology: "Monstrosity" in the British Novel from 1850 to 1930. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2462 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Terri Beth Miller entitled "From Prodigy to Pathology: "Monstrosity" in the British Novel from 1850 to 1930." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in English. Urmila Seshagiri, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Stanton B. Garner Jr., Amy Elias, Bryant Creel Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) From Prodigy to Pathology: “Monstrosity” in the British Novel from 1850 to 1930 A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Terri Beth Miller August 2013 Copyright 2013 by Terri Beth Miller. All rights reserved. ii Dedication I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my mother and travel companion, Linda Miller. Thank you for this incredible journey. iii Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude, first and foremost, to my magnificent dissertation committee, Dr. Urmila Seshagiri, Dr. Stanton B. Garner, Jr., Dr. Amy Elias, and Dr. Bryant Creel. It has been an honor and a privilege to work with each of you. Thank you for challenging me, encouraging me, and uplifting me every step of the way. There will never be time enough to articulate what your mentoring and your friendship have meant to me. I also would like to extend special thanks to my dissertation director, Dr. Urmila Seshagiri, whose brilliance is surpassed only by her kindness. You have made this process a joy. I am also thankful for the special contributions of Dr. Ben Lee, who helped to shape this project into what it is today. My sincerest gratitude goes out as well to the amazing professors, staff, and students of the University of Tennessee. I cannot adequately express my appreciation for the unflagging support and constant inspiration you have provided. I am also grateful to the faculty of the Department of English and to our incredible administrative staff, Judith Welch, Dinah Brock, Donna Bodenheimer, and Leanne Hinkle, for making our department feel like home. To my beloved students, I send my gratitude for teaching me far more than I could ever teach you. My deepest thanks go out to the many mentors who guided me so brilliantly along the first stages of this journey: Dr. Taimi Olsen, Dr. Susan North, Dr. Katie Hoffman, Ms. Elizabeth Gordon, and Ms. Mary Boyes. This would not have been possible without you. I am also more grateful than I can express for my wonderful family and friends: my father and mother, Terry and Linda Miller, for loving me through my most unlovable moments; my uncle and aunt, Phillip and Sue Oler, for being my second parents; Jay and Jeff Oler and Susan Boyd, for being the brothers and sister I never had; my uncle and aunt, Roger and Sue Miller, for filling my heart; and the memory of my grandparents, Rev. Tommy and Mabel Oler, for imbuing my earliest moments on this Earth with love and joy. I also send my gratitude and love to my dearest friends and greatest cheerleaders, Amy Greene and Linda Vines Dotson. Above all, I give thanks to the Most High, my fortress and my refuge, Jesus Christ. It is in You that I dwell, breathe, and have my being. It is from You that all blessings derive and it is to You that I give all glory. iv Abstract In this project, I explore cultural representations of aberrant embodiment, society’s monsters, to assess the sociopolitical implications of corporeal deviance. I contend that imaginative literature participates in the re/construction of monstrous bodies as an element of a larger social process of individuation and communal boundary-making, the defining of self and community through exclusionary practices embedded in the body. By situating Victorian and modernist British novels in dialog with one another, I chart a trajectory in cultural understandings of embodied deviance that moves “from prodigy to pathology.” The change occurs, I argue, because the rise of modern medical practices ultimately constitutes the “domestication” of the monster, rendering it knowable, predictable, and containable within the boundaries of the diagnostic paradigm. Whereas the monster in Victorian fiction presents an ambivalent figure, both threatening and alluring, in modernism, the monster has been rendered largely performative and instrumental, the product of its pathologization by scientific discourse. v Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………… .1 Chapter 1: Excess, Transgression, and Transformation: Metamorphic Bodies and the Monstrous City in Dickens’ Bleak House…………………………………………………………..15 Chapter 2: Unbounded Bodies/Unbridled Blood: Beasts Within and Beasts Without in Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and Stoker’s Dracula……….……………………66 Chapter 3: Discursive Monsters/Monstrous Discourse: Re/Presenting the Unspeakable Body in Joyce’s Ulysses................................................................................................................124 Chapter 4: Dis/Embodying the Community: Combination, Connection, and Monstrous Singularity in Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway………………………………………………….173 Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………………….218 Vita……………………………………………………………………………………………...227 vi Introduction: From Prodigy to Pathology 1 All living souls welcome whatever they are ready to cope with; all else they ignore, or pronounce to be monstrous and wrong, or deny to be possible. George Santayana I have seen no more evident monstrosity and miracle in the world than myself. Michel de Montaigne This text centers upon the study of human “monsters,” those beings who, in the radical singularity of their bodies (and, sometimes, their minds) call into question both the status of their own humanity and the limits of the human within us all. Within this context, the term “monstrous” will be used to denote those bodies which, by virtue of a perceived physical, sexual, racial, or psychological difference have been discursively, ideologically, and politically situated outside of an imagined norm that is itself highly contextual and contingent, but which derives its power and its authority through the construction of a monstrous1 other. A core premise of this analysis derives from a founding principle of feminist, post-colonial, and disability studies: that material bodies are at once the substance and the product of ideological construction, the corporeal manifestation of and rationalization for the cultural metanarratives upon which hierarchical norms, values, and power structures are based, as well as the potential and actual sites for the interrogation and contestation of these hegemonic paradigms. As both flesh and discourse, then, bodies function within the social space as the occasion for and outcome of narrative. Within this context, non-normative bodies occupy a unique position in that they at once validate and frustrate the discursive paradigms into which they come, eliciting the normativizing parables seeking to construct and contain the normative subject while also embodying the subversion of that norm, the ever-present reality of the body’s refusal to be circumscribed by natural laws and the social order ostensibly dependent upon and authorized by such laws. 1 I use this term specifically signify those bodies which are perceived to be in some way singular, non-normative, extraordinary, aberrant, or deviant in reference to paradigms of the “normal.” 2 The nexus between body and discourse lies at the heart of this study, then, insofar as the following chapters will highlight and problematize the dialectical networks connecting cultural production with empirical inquiry. Specifically, this analysis will center upon the complex, fluid, and interdependent relationships between literature and science from the high Victorian to the high modernist eras. The centrality of literature to this study derives from the premise that singular embodiments have long occupied a pivotal role in narrative but that the function of such non-normative characters had received relatively little attention prior to the advent of disability studies in the late twentieth century. As David Mitchell and Sharon Snyder note [D]isability pervades literary narrative, first, as a stock feature of characterization and, second, as an opportunistic metaphorical device…a primary impetus of the storyteller’s efforts….[and] a metaphorical signifier of social