DOCSLIB.ORG

Techniques and Tips for Raising Implicit Bias in Court: Use of Videos, Jury Instructions, and Voir Dire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Techniques and Tips for Raising Implicit Bias in Court: Use of Videos, Jury Instructions, and Voir Dire Techniques and Tips for Raising Implicit Bias in Court: Use of Videos, Jury Instructions, and Voir Dire Selected Materials From Multiple Presenters Lisa Hay Federal Public Defender TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Materials for Further Self-Study and Education ............................................................. 1 2. Proposed Oregon Unconscious Bias Jury Instruction s...................................................... 3 3. Ninth Circuit Model Instructions..................................................................................... 4. Can Explicit Instructions Reduce Expression of Implicit Bias? ...................................... 5 5. Bar Bulletin, King County Bar Association .................................................................. 35 6. US v. Jacorey Sanders Motion for Attorney Conducted Voir Dire on Implicit Bias and Memorandum in Support ........................................................................................ 37 7. Excerpts of Voir Dire Questions .................................................................................... 55 8. Raising Unconscious Bias in Voir Dire ......................................................................... 70 9. Achieving an Impartial Jury (AIJ) Toolbox ................................................................... 71 10. A New Approach to Voir Dire on Racial Bias, UC Irvine Law Review ...................... 139 Materials for Further Self-Study and Education* Justice Adrienne Nelson Unconscious Bias Video for Jurors A direct link to the video: Understanding the Effects of Unconscious Bias: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA-z4mS_Evg Websites ABA Achieving an Impartial Jury (AIJ) Toolbox https://www.judges.org/wp-content/uploads/Achieving-an- Impartial_Jury_Toolbox.pdf ABA Diversity and Inclusion 360 Commission Toolkit https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/diversity- portal/implicitbias_toolkit.pdf National Center for State Courts Helping courts address implicit bias: Resources for education https://www.ncsc.org/ibeducation Love Has No Labels https://lovehasnolabels.com/why-it-matters/ Articles/Primer/Handbook Jerry Kang Implicit Bias: A Primer For Courts, National Center for State Courts (2009) https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/14875/kangibprimer.pdf Jerry Kang et al. Implicit Bias in the Courtroom, 59 UCLA L. REV. 1124, 1180 (2012) Southern Poverty Law Center Speak Up: Responding to Everyday Bigotry https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/d6_legacy_files/downloads/publ ication/splcspeak_up_handbook_0.pdf Podcasts Page 1 of 169 “Seeing White” podcast series www.sceneonradio.org/seeing-white/ Uncomfortable Conversations with a Black Man Emmanuel Acho podcast https://uncomfortableconvos.com/ Books Oregon Historical Quarterly Special Issue White Supremacy & Resistance Winter 2019, Volume 120, Number 4 by Oregon Historical Society Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking by Malcolm Gladwell Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman How to be an Antiracist by Ibram X. Kendi Racing to Justice by john a. powell Racism Without Racists by Eduardo Bonilla-Silva Slavery by Another Name by Douglas A. Blackmon The Color of Law by Richard Rothstein The Hidden Brain by Shankar Vedantam The Myth of the Model Minority by Rosalind S. Chou & Joe R. Feagin The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Color Blindness by Michelle Alexander They Can’t Kill Us by Wesley Lowery Unaccompanied by Javier Zamora White by Law Ian Haney López When Affirmative Action was White by Ira Katznelson White Fragility by Robin DiAngelo Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race by Reni Eddo- Lodge Page 2 of 169 PROPOSED OREGON UNCONSCIOUS BIAS JURY INSTRUCTION (These instructions are based on the Ninth Circuit Model Instructions, with additions) 1.1 DUTY OF JURY Jurors: You now are the jury in this case, and I want to take a few minutes to tell you something about your duties as jurors and to give you some preliminary instructions. At the end of the trial I will give you more detailed [written] instructions that will control your deliberations. When you deliberate, it will be your duty to weigh and to evaluate all the evidence received in the case and, in that process, to decide the facts. To the facts as you find them, you will apply the law as I give it to you, whether you agree with the law or not. You must decide the case solely on the evidence and the law before you. Perform these duties fairly and impartially. Do not allow personal likes or dislikes, sympathy, prejudice, fear, or public opinion to influence you. You should not be influenced by any person’s race, color, religion, national ancestry, or gender, sexual orientation, profession, occupation, celebrity, economic circumstances, or position in life or in the community. Finally, you should make an effort to be aware of your unconscious biases and what effect those may have on your decision-making. You may recall during jury selection, [the attorneys/I] asked the panel if any of you had ever heard the term “unconscious bias.” That term is one used by social scientists to describe the reality that everyone[, including me,]1 has feelings, assumptions, perceptions, fears, and stereotypes, that is, “unconscious biases,” that we may not be aware of. These hidden thoughts can affect what we see and hear, how we remember what we see and hear, how we interact with others, and how we make important decisions. 1 The court can omit reference to “including me.” Page 3 of 169 3.1 DUTIES OF JURY TO FIND FACTS AND FOLLOW LAW Members of the jury, now that you have heard all the evidence, it is my duty to instruct you on the law that applies to this case. A copy of these instructions will be available in the jury room for you to consult. It is your duty to weigh and to evaluate all the evidence received in the case and, in that process, to decide the facts. It is also your duty to apply the law as I give it to you to the facts as you find them, whether you agree with the law or not. You must decide the case solely on the evidence and the law. Do not allow personal likes or dislikes, sympathy, prejudice, fear, or public opinion to influence you. You should not be influenced by any person’s race, color, religion, national ancestry, or gender, sexual orientation, profession, occupation, celebrity, economic circumstances, or position in life or in the community. You will recall that you took an oath promising to do so at the beginning of the case. Finally, you should make an effort to be aware of your unconscious biases and what effect those may have on your decision-making. You may recall at the beginning of this trial during jury selection, [the attorneys/I] asked the panel if any of you had ever heard the term “unconscious bias.” That term is one used by social scientists to describe the reality that everyone[, including me,]2 has feelings, assumptions, perceptions, fears, and stereotypes, that is, “unconscious biases,” that we may not be aware of. These hidden thoughts can affect what we see and hear, how we remember what we see and hear, how we interact with others, and how we make important decisions. Because you are making very important decisions in this case, you should evaluate the evidence carefully and resist jumping to conclusions based on personal likes or dislikes, generalizations, gut feelings, prejudices, sympathies, stereotypes, or biases. The law demands that you return a just verdict, based solely on the evidence, your individual evaluations of that evidence, your reason and common sense, and these instructions. Our system of justice is counting on you to render a fair decision based on the evidence, not on biases. You must follow all these instructions and not single out some and ignore others; they are all important. Please do not read into these instructions or into anything I may have said or done any suggestion as to what verdict you should return—that is a matter entirely up to you. 2 The court can omit reference to “including me.” Page 4 of 169 NINTH CIRCUIT MODEL INSTRUCTIONS Perform these duties fairly and impartially. You should not be influenced by any person’s race, color, religious beliefs, national ancestry, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender, or economic circumstances. Also, do not allow yourself to be influenced by personal likes or dislikes, sympathy, prejudice, fear, public opinion, or biases, including unconscious biases. Unconscious biases are stereotypes, attitudes, or preferences that people may consciously reject but may be expressed without conscious awareness, control, or intention. Like conscious bias, unconscious bias can affect how we evaluate information and make decisions. Ninth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instructions 1.1 – Duty of Jury You must avoid bias, conscious or unconscious, based on a witness’s race, color, religious beliefs, national ancestry, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender, or economic circumstances in your determination of credibility. Ninth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instructions 1.7 – Credibility of a Witness It is your duty to weigh and to evaluate all the evidence received in the case and, in that process, to decide the facts. It is also your duty to apply the law as I give it to you to the facts as you find them, whether you agree with the law or not. You must decide the case solely on the evidence and the law. Do not allow personal likes or dislikes, sympathy, prejudice, fear, or public opinion to influence you. You should also not be influenced by any person’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ETHICS OWNERS a New Model of Organizational Responsibility in Data-Driven Technology Companies
    ETHICS OWNERS A New Model of Organizational Responsibility in Data-Driven Technology Companies Emanuel Moss Jacob Metcalf September 2020 Author: Emanuel Moss, doctoral candidate in Anthropology, CUNY Graduate Center, New York. Author: Jacob Metcalf, PhD, 2010, Philosophy, University of California, Santa Cruz. ETHICS OWNERS - 1 - PREFACE he world has moved in remarkable ways since this research Twas first initiated in late 2018 and the analysis was finalized in early-2020. Since then, we have seen the COVID-19 pandemic and the resurgence of the #BlackLivesMatter movement following the police killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and all too many others. Given these critical events, we as researchers and as members of a research organization paused to reflect on how our work speaks to the urgent injustices laid bare today. These events have dramatically foregrounded existing calls for jus- tice at the intersections of technology, unjust social and political structures, digital privacy, surveillance, and the values and purpose of technology corporations. Many of the defining events that have shaped ethics in the tech sector in recent years—including tech worker organization, walkouts and resignations over military con- tracts, continued contestations over racial and sexual harassment inside of tech companies, legislation and regulations, and critical audits—have been and continue to be the contentious background to the research conducted for this report. Our research takes place amidst, but is not primarily about, these tectonic changes that have repeatedly reframed the broader tech ethics conversation. It is in- stead about the ways those inside of tech companies have begun reshaping corporate practices against this background—how they understand the problems their industry faces, the means at their disposal to address these problems, and the lines of thought that shape those understandings.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Racism, Police Brutality of Black People, and the Use of Violence in Quelling Peaceful Protests in America
    SYSTEMIC RACISM, POLICE BRUTALITY OF BLACK PEOPLE, AND THE USE OF VIOLENCE IN QUELLING PEACEFUL PROTESTS IN AMERICA WILLIAMS C. IHEME* “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” —Martin Luther King Jr Abstract: The Trump Administration and its mantra to ‘Make America Great Again’ has been calibrated with racism and severe oppression against Black people in America who still bear the deep marks of slavery. After the official abolition of slavery in the second half of the nineteenth century, the initial inability of Black people to own land, coupled with the various Jim Crow laws rendered the acquired freedom nearly insignificant in the face of poverty and hopelessness. Although the age-long struggles for civil rights and equal treatments have caused the acquisition of more black-letter rights, the systemic racism that still perverts the American justice system has largely disabled these rights: the result is that Black people continue to exist at the periphery of American economy and politics. Using a functional approach and other types of approach to legal and sociological reasoning, this article examines the supportive roles of Corporate America, Mainstream Media, and White Supremacists in winnowing the systemic oppression that manifests largely through police brutality. The article argues that some of the sustainable solutions against these injustices must be tackled from the roots and not through window-dressing legislation, which often harbor the narrow interests of Corporate America. Keywords: Black people, racism, oppression, violence, police brutality, prison, bail, mass incarceration, protests. Summary: 1. INTRODUCTION: SLAVE TRADE AS THE ENTRY POINT OF SYSTEMIC RACISM.
    [Show full text]
  • Holistic Approach to Mental Illnesses at the Toby of Ambohibao Madagascar Daniel A
    Luther Seminary Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary Doctor of Ministry Theses Student Theses 2002 Holistic Approach to Mental Illnesses at the Toby of Ambohibao Madagascar Daniel A. Rakotojoelinandrasana Luther Seminary Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/dmin_theses Part of the Christianity Commons, Mental and Social Health Commons, and the Practical Theology Commons Recommended Citation Rakotojoelinandrasana, Daniel A., "Holistic Approach to Mental Illnesses at the Toby of Ambohibao Madagascar" (2002). Doctor of Ministry Theses. 19. http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/dmin_theses/19 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctor of Ministry Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOLISTIC APPROACH TO MENTAL ILLNESSES AT THE TOBY OF AMBOHIBAO MADAGASCAR by DANIEL A. RAKOTOJOELINANDRASANA A Thesis Submitted to, the Faculty of Luther Seminary And The Minnesota Consortium of Seminary Faculties In Partial Fulfillments of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF MINISTRY THESIS ADVISOR: RICHARD WALLA CE. SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 2002 LUTHER SEMINARY USRARY 22-75Como Aver:ue 1 ©2002 by Daniel Rakotojoelinandrasana All rights reserved 2 Thesis Project Committee Dr. Richard Wallace, Luther Seminary, Thesis Advisor Dr. Craig Moran, Luther Seminary, Reader Dr. J. Michael Byron, St. Paul Seminary, School of Divinity, Reader ABSTRACT The Church is to reclaim its teaching and praxis of the healing ministry at the example of Jesus Christ who preached, taught and healed. Healing is holistic, that is, caring for the whole person, physical, mental, social and spiritual.
    [Show full text]
  • Principled Policing Facilitation Guide
    Principled Policing Procedural Justice and Implicit Bias Training Facilitation Guide POST CCN 12426 A Partnership Among: § Commission on Peace Officers Standards and Training § California Department of Justice § Oakland Police Department § Stockton Police Department § Stanford SPARQ: Social Psychological Answers to Real-World Questions § California Partnership for Safe Communities Based on the Procedural Justice curriculum developed by Professors Tom Tyler & Tracey Meares, Yale University, in partnership with the Chicago Police Department, and the Implicit Bias curriculum developed by Professors Jennifer Eberhardt & Hazel Markus, Stanford SPARQ Last revised 9.12.16 Principled Policing: A Discussion of Procedural Justice and Implicit Bias Facilitation Guide Overview & Introduction to Principled Policing Facilitation Guide Revised: September 12, 2016 Introduction Principled Policing, specifically procedural justice and implicit bias, teaches policing approaches that emphasize respect, listening, neutrality, and trust (Procedural Justice) while also addressing the common implicit biases that can be barriers to these approaches (Implicit Bias). Law enforcement can improve trust and relationships between law enforcement agencies and their communities by using these principles to evaluate their policies, procedures and training within their departments. The Principled Policing Facilitation Guide provides a roadmap for instructors preparing to teach the 8-hour Principled Policing course. Overview of the Course Goals & Objectives By the end of this course, attendees will: · Learn about the concepts of procedural justice, police legitimacy, and implicit bias. · Understand the different roles policing has sometimes played throughout history and the effect this has on community trust and support for police. · Understand implicit bias and how it can be a barrier to procedural justice. · Understand the ways that procedural justice principles can be implemented in law enforcement’s daily interactions with the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Its Stories, People, and Legacy
    THE SCRIPPS SCHOOL Its Stories, People, and Legacy Edited by RALPH IZARD THE SCRIPPS SCHOOL Property of Ohio University's E.W. Scripps School of Journalism. Not for resale or distribution. Property of Ohio University's E.W. Scripps School of Journalism. Not for resale or distribution. THE SCRIPPS SCHOOL Its Stories, People, and Legacy Edited by Ralph Izard Ohio University Press Athens Property of Ohio University's E.W. Scripps School of Journalism. Not for resale or distribution. Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio 45701 ohioswallow.com © 2018 by Ohio University Press All rights reserved To obtain permission to quote, reprint, or otherwise reproduce or distribute material from Ohio University Press publications, please contact our rights and permissions department at (740) 593-1154 or (740) 593-4536 (fax). Printed in the United States of America Ohio University Press books are printed on acid-free paper ™ 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 5 4 3 2 1 Frontispiece: Schoonover Center for Communication, home of the school, 2013–present. (Photo courtesy of Ohio University) Photographs, pages xiv, xx, 402, and 428: Scripps Hall, home of the school, 1986–2013. (Photo courtesy of Ohio University) Hardcover ISBN: 978-0-8214-2315-8 Electronic ISBN: 978-0-8214-4630-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018945765 The E.W. Scripps School of Journalism is indebted to G. Kenner Bush for funding this project through the Gordon K. Bush Memorial Fund. The fund honors a longtime pub- lisher of The Athens Messenger who was a special friend to the school.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Arbitration
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 74 Issue 4 May 2021 Article 4 5-2021 Police Arbitration Stephen Rushin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Stephen Rushin, Police Arbitration, 74 Vanderbilt Law Review 1023 (2021) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol74/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Police Arbitration Stephen Rushin* Before punishing an officer for professional misconduct, police departments often provide the officer with an opportunity to file an appeal. In many police departments, this appeals process culminates in a hearing before an arbitrator. While numerous media reports have suggested that arbitrators regularly overturn or reduce discipline, little legal research has comprehensively examined the outcomes of police disciplinary appeals across the United States. In order to better understand the use of arbitration in police disciplinary appeals and build on prior research, this Article draws on a dataset of 624 arbitration awards issued between 2006 and 2020 from a diverse range of law enforcement agencies. It finds that arbitrators on appeal reduced or overturned police officer discipline in 52% of these cases. In 46% of cases involving termination, arbitrators ordered police departments to rehire previously terminated officers. On average, arbitrators reduced the length of officer suspensions by approximately 49%. Arbitrators gave several common justifications for reductions in officer discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Stereotype Threat Effects in Afro-Caribbean Immigrant Groups
    #3247—Social Psychology Quarterly—VOL. 70 NO. 4—70408-Deaux Social Psychology Quarterly 2007, Vol. 70, No. 4, 384–404 Becoming American: Stereotype Threat Effects in Afro-Caribbean Immigrant Groups* KAY DEAUX Graduate Center, City University of New York NIDA BIKMEN Denison University ALWYN GILKES Medgar Evers College, City University of New York ANA VENTUNEAC YVANNE JOSEPH Graduate Center, City University of New York YASSER PAYNE University of Delaware CLAUDE STEELE Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences Educational and occupational data suggest that second-generation West Indian immigrants have less favorable outcomes than their first-generation counterparts, who are typically shown to outperform comparison groups of African Americans. In two studies, we explore the social psychological process of stereotype threat as it differentially affects the performance of first- and second-generation West Indian students. An initial questionnaire study of 270 West Indian students provided data on perceived favorability of African American and West Indian stereotypes, ethnic identification, and perceptions of discrimination. An experimental study of stereotype threat showed a significant interaction between generation and stereotype threat condition: first- and second- generation West Indian students performed equally in neutral conditions, but differed significantly when stereotype threat was present. While first- generation students increased their performance in the threat condition, second-generation students showed the performance decrements characteristic of African American students. Effects due to the race of the experimenter were also found, suggesting the importance of context in testing situations. Overall, the findings argue for the relevance of psychological processes in understanding broader demographic patterns of immigration and change.
    [Show full text]
  • August 15, 2014 Chief Thomas Jackson Ferguson Police
    August 15, 2014 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 Arlington, Va. 22209-2211 Chief Thomas Jackson (703) 807-2100 Ferguson Police Department www.rcfp.org 222 S. Florissant Road Bruce D. Brown Executive Director Ferguson, MO 63135 [email protected] (703) 807-2101 Chief Jon Belmar STEERING COMMITTEE St. Louis County Police Department SCOTT APPLEWHITE 7900 Forsyth Boulevard The Associated Press WOLF BLITZER St. Louis, MO 63105 CNN DAVID BOARDMAN Temple University Colonel Ronald K. Replogle CHIP BOK Creators Syndicate Missouri State Highway Patrol JAN CRAWFORD General Headquarters CBS News MICHAEL DUFFY 1510 East Elm Street Time Jefferson City, MO 65101 RICHARD S. DUNHAM Tsinghua University, Beijing ASHLEA EBELING Forbes Magazine SUSAN GOLDBERG Re: Police detention of journalists in Ferguson, Missouri, and National Geographic FRED GRAHAM public access to information Founding Member JOHN C. HENRY Freelance Dear Sirs, NAT HENTOFF United Media Newspaper Syndicate JEFF LEEN As organizations that cover news and defend the rights of journalists to The Washington Post DAHLIA LITHWICK gather the news, we write to express our deep concern over the unwarranted Slate detention of two journalists on Wednesday and with other reports of police TONY MAURO National Law Journal intimidation and harassment of journalists in Ferguson. It is also extremely JANE MAYER The New Yorker troubling that the police have not been more timely in releasing the records DAVID McCUMBER surrounding these incidents and the shooting of Michael Brown. Hearst Newspapers JOHN McKINNON The Wall Street Journal While we understand the responsibilities of your three law DOYLE MCMANUS Los Angeles Times enforcement agencies differ substantially in these events, we write to all of ANDREA MITCHELL you in the hope of assuring that these issues going forward are handled in a NBC News MAGGIE MULVIHILL manner that protects the First Amendment interests of the press and the public Boston University in accurate news reports out of Ferguson.
    [Show full text]
  • Jennifer Eberhardt Morris M
    Jennifer Eberhardt Morris M. Doyle Centennial Professor of Public Policy and Professor, by courtesy, of Law Psychology Bio BIO A social psychologist at Stanford University, Jennifer Eberhardt investigates the consequences of the psychological association between race and crime. Through interdisciplinary collaborations and a wide ranging array of methods—from laboratory studies to novel field experiments—Eberhardt has revealed the startling, and often dispiriting, extent to which racial imagery and judgments suffuse our culture and society, and in particular shape actions and outcomes within the domain of criminal justice. ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS • Professor, Psychology • Professor (By courtesy), Stanford Law School • Faculty Affiliate, Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS • Teaching Faculty Member, Departments of Psychology and African and African American Studies, Yale University, (1995-1998) • Faculty Member, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Stanford University, (1998- present) BOARDS, ADVISORY COMMITTEES, PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS • Co-director, Center for Social Psychological Answers to Real-World Questions (SPARQ), Stanford University PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION • Ph.D., Harvard University (1993) • A.M., Harvard University (1990) • B.A., University of Cincinnati (1987) LINKS • Personal website: http://web.stanford.edu/~eberhard//// Research & Scholarship CURRENT RESEARCH AND SCHOLARLY INTERESTS My research is on race and inequality. I am especially interested in examining race
    [Show full text]
  • The Grief Edition 90 Editorial Note: the Content for This Edition of New Therapist Was Coordinated and Managed by Darcy EDITOR Harris, One of the Contributors
    NewIndispensable survival guide for Therapistthe thinking psychotherapist March/April 2014 The Grief Edition 90 Editorial note: The content for this edition of New Therapist was coordinated and managed by Darcy EDITOR Harris, one of the contributors. We are deeply John Söderlund grateful to Darcy for generously providing her astute and efficient editorial management of thisedition. MANAGING EDITOR Lee-ann Bailey FEATURES EDITOR Features Sue Spencer CONTRIBUTING EDITORS 6 Good Grief: A Contemporary Dylan Evans Orientation to Bereavement Graham Lindegger Jacqui de Mare Counseling Julie Manegold Tim Barry Robert A. Neimeyer with John Tom Strong Kelly Quayle Soderlund Robert Langs Simone Descoins Robert Waska A fate less than death: 14 CONTRIBUTIONS Supporting clients through non- Submissions for inclusion in New Therapist are welcomed. death loss and grief New Therapist reserves the right to edit or exclude any submission. Names and identifying information of all individuals mentioned in case material have been changed to By Darcy Harris protect their identities. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of New Therapist, its publishers or distributors. Coming to grief: What you ADVERTISING 20 need to know about grief in Advertising deadlines for New Therapist are six weeks prior to the first Monday of the month of publication. Please call or DSM-5 email for a media pack and rate card, or visit our web site at www.NewTherapist.com. By Phyllis Kosminsky SUBSCRIPTIONS Subscription charges are $48 per year to all international destinations (including postage). To South African Getting grief working: A guide destinations, subscription charges are R320 per year 25 (including VAT and postage).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Implicit Bias Awareness Training in the NYPD
    The Impacts of Implicit Bias Awareness Training in the NYPD July, 2020 Robert E. Worden Sarah J. McLean Robin S. Engel Hannah Cochran Nicholas Corsaro Danielle Reynolds Cynthia J. Najdowski Gabrielle T. Isaza Table of Contents Chapter Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... iv Executive Summary .......................................................................................... v About the Authors ............................................................................................ vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 Implicit Bias in Policing ..................................................................... 2 Implicit Bias Training .......................................................................... 8 Our Study of the NYPD ..................................................................... 11 2 Implicit Bias Training for Police ................................................................... 13 Training Curricula ................................................................................ 13 Outcomes of Implicit Bias Training ............................................... 25 Organizational Context .................................................................... 33 Extant Evaluation Evidence .............................................................. 35 Insights from Social Psychology ................................................... 36 FIP
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program Weary Symposium on Diversity and Social Identity the Ohio State University June 18-19, 2019 Columbus, OH
    Conference Program Weary Symposium on Diversity and Social Identity The Ohio State University June 18-19, 2019 Columbus, OH Tuesday June 18, 2019 Wednesday June 19, 2019 9:30-10:00 Breakfast 9:00-9:30 Breakfast 9:55-10:00 Opening Remarks 9:25-9:30 Opening Remarks 10:00-11:00 Dr. Mary Murphy 9:30-10:30 Dr. Sylvia Perry 11:00-12:00 Dr. Jason Okonofua 10:30-11:30 Dr. Hilary Bergsieker 12:00-1:00 Lunch 11:30-12:00 Data Blitz #2 (pg. 9) 12:30-1:30 Poster Session #1 (pg. 3) 12:00-1:00 Lunch 1:30-2:00 Data Blitz #1 (pg. 5) 12:30-1:30 Poster Session #2 (pg. 10) 2:00-3:00 Dr. Denise Sekaquaptewa 1:30-2:30 Early Career Talks #2 (pg. 12) 3:00-3:15 Break 2:30-3:30 Dr. Claude Steele 3:15-4:15 Early Career Talks #1 (pg. 6) 3:30-3:45 Wrap-Up 4:15-5:15 Dr. Jennifer Richeson 5:15-5:30 Wrap-Up Social Hour/Networking 6:00-7:30 The Eagle 790 N High St. Columbus, OH Conference Dinner 7:30-9:30 Hubbard Grille 793 N High St. Columbus, OH 1 Tuesday June 18, 2019 Distinguished Speaker Tuesday 10:00AM-11:00AM Dr. Mary C. Murphy, Indiana University - Bloomington Dr. Mary Murphy is the H.B. Wells Professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Associate Vice Provost for Diversity and Inclusion at Indiana University. Her research focuses on understanding how people’s social identities and group memberships, such as their gender, race, and socio-economic status, interact with the contexts they encounter to affect people’s thoughts, feelings, motivation, and performance.
    [Show full text]