DOCSLIB.ORG

Auguste Comte Sociology Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Auguste Comte Sociology Pdf Auguste comte sociology pdf Continue This article or section may need to be formatted. You can help Wikipedia by formatting if you know how to do it. Please also consider changing this notice to be more specific. (March 2020) August ComtePortrait by TouillonBornIsidore Marie Auguste Francois Xavier Comte (1798-01-19)19 January 1798Montpellier, FranceDied5 September 1857 (1857-09-05) (age 59) Paris, Paris, Paris FranceNationalityFrancefranceTheormanus MaterUniversity MontpellierCole PolytechnicSpouse (s) Carolina Massin (m. 1825-1842)Era19th century PhilosophyRegionWestern PhilosophyRecent ideasSociological positivism, law of three stages, encyclopedic law, altruism affects Bacon, Bichat, Condorcet, Descartes, Saint-Simon, Diderot, Emil Littre, Karl Marx, Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud, Jon Stewart Mill , Friedrich Nietzsche, Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, Charles Morras, Harriet Martino, Pierre Laffitte, Eugen Durang, George Henry Lewis, Edward Spencer Beasley, Frederick Harrison, Leo Isidore Marie Auguste Francois Xavier Graf (French: oɡyst kɔ̃ t (listen); 19 January 1798 -5 September 1857 He is often regarded as the first philosopher of science in the modern sense of the word. Comte's ideas were also fundamental to the development of sociology; in fact, he invented the term and regarded this discipline as the crowning achievement of science. Under the influence of the utopian socialist Henri de Saint-Simon, Comte developed a positive philosophy in an attempt to correct the social unrest caused by the French Revolution, which, in his opinion, indicates an imminent transition to a new form of society. He sought to create a new social doctrine based on science, which he called positivism. He had a great influence on the thoughts of the 19th century, influencing the work of social thinkers such as John Stuart Mill and George Eliot. His concept of sociology and social evolutionism set the tone for early social theorists and anthropologists such as Harriet Martino and Herbert Spencer, evolving into modern academic sociology, presented by Emile Durkheim as practical and objective social studies. The culmination of The Comit's social theories was its Religion of Humanity, which anticipated the development of non-istical religious humanist and secular humanist organizations in the 19th century. He may also have invented the word altruism (altruism). On January 19, 1798, Ayle Auguste Comt was born in Montpellier. After visiting Lyc'e Joffre and then the University of Montpellier, Comt was admitted to the Polytechnic School in Paris. The Polytechnic School was notable for its commitment to the French ideals of republicanism and progress. However, in 1816 the School was closed for reorganization, and Cote continued his studies at the medical school in Montpellier. When reopened, he did not ask for readmission. Upon his return to Montpellier, Comte soon came to see an irresistible difference with his Catholic and monarchical family and went again to Paris, earning money for small jobs. In August 1817 he found an apartment on The Street Bonaparte, 36 in the 6th arrondissement of Paris (where he lived until 1822), and later that year he became a student and secretary of Henri de Saint-Simon, who brought Comte into contact with the intellectual society and greatly influenced his thoughts from there. During this time, Comt published his first essays in various publications led by Saint-Simon, L'Industrial, Le Politique, and L'Organisateur (Charles Dunoyer and Charles Comte in Le Censeur Europ'en), although he would not publish under his own name until 1819 La s'paration g'eration entre les opinions and les d'sirs (General Division of Opinions). In 1824 Comte left Saint-Simon, again due to an insurmountable difference. Comte published a plan de travaux scientifiques n'cessaires pour r'organizer la soci'te (1822) (Plan of scientific research required to reorganize society). But he failed to get an academic position. His day-to-day life depended on sponsors and financial help from friends. Controversy is raging about how much Comte appropriated The Work of Saint-Simon. In 1825, the Cat married Caroline Massin. In 1826 he was taken to a psychiatric hospital, but was left untreated - only stabilized By French alien Joan-Etienne Dominique Esquirol - so he could work again on his plan (he later attempted suicide in 1827 by jumping with Pont de Art). Between this and their divorce in 1842, he published six volumes of his Chickens. Comte has developed a close friendship with Jon Stewart Mill. Since 1844 he fell deeply in love with the Catholic Clotilde de Vaud, although since she was not divorced from her first husband, their love was never completed. After her death in 1846, this love became quasi-religious, and Comte, working closely with Mill (who perfects his own such system) developed a new Religion of Humanity. John Kells Ingram, a Comte supporter, visited him in Paris in 1855. Tomb of Auguste Comte He published four volumes of Syst'me de politique positive (1851-1854). His last work, the first volume of Synthesis Subjective (Subjective Synthesis), was published in 1856. Conte died in Paris on September 5, 1857 from stomach cancer and was buried in the famous Per-Lachaise cemetery surrounded by cenotaphs in memory of his mother Rosalie Boyer and Clotilde de Vox. His apartment in 1841-1857 is now preserved as the House d'Auguste-Comte and is located at 10 rue Monsieur-le-Prince, in the 6th arrondissement of Paris. Comte's work in Positivism Main articles: Positivism and the law of the three stages Comte first described epistemological positivism in the Course of Positive Philosophy, a series of texts published between 1830 and 1842. These texts were followed by the work of 1848,general view of positivism (published in English in 1865). The first three volumes of the Course focused on the already existing physical sciences (mathematics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, biology), while the latter two emphasized the inevitable advent of social sciences. By observing the circular dependence of theory and observation in science and classifying science in this way, Comte can be seen as the first philosopher of science in the modern sense of the word. Comte was also the first to clearly distinguish natural philosophy from science. In his opinion, physical sciences must have come first before humanity could adequately direct its efforts to the most complex and complex queen of science of human society itself. Therefore, in his work, the View on Positivism will be more detailed in the empirical goals of the sociological method. (quote necessary) Conte proposed a report on social evolution, suggesting that society goes through three stages in its quest for truth in accordance with the general law of three stages. The Comte stages were (1) theological stage, (2) the metaphysical stage, and (3) the positive stage. (1) Theological scene was seen from the perspective of 19th-century France as a preceding of the Enlightenment, in which the place of man in society and the limitations of society on man were associated with God. Man blindly believed in what his ancestors taught him. He believed in supernatural power. Fetishism played a significant role during this time. (2) On the metaphysical stage, Comte referred not to the metaphysics of Aristotle or other ancient Greek philosophers. Rather, the idea was rooted in the problems of French society after the French Revolution of 1789. This metaphysical stage is associated with the justification of universal rights as a lauded higher plane than the power of any human ruler to resist, although said that the rights were not a reference to the sacred behind a simple metaphor. This stage is known as the stage of investigation because people have started reasoning and questioning, although no hard evidence has been laid. The stage of the investigation was the beginning of a world that questioned authority and religion. (3) In the scientific stage that emerged after the failure of the revolution and Napoleon, people could find solutions to social problems and bring them into force, despite the proclamation of human rights or the prophecy of God's will. Science began to answer questions in full. In this respect, he looked like Karl Marx and Jeremy Bentham. At one time, this idea of the scientific stage was considered modern, although from a later point of view it is too derivative of physics and academic history. The law of the three-stage comta was one of the first theories of social evolutionism. Comta Science Theory - According to him, entire sciences consist of theoretical and applied knowledge. Theoretical knowledge is divided into common areas like physics or biology, which are the object of his research and detailed such as botany, zoology or mineralogy. The main areas of mathematics, astronomy, physics, chemistry, biology and sociology can be ordered in accordance with the maternity range of research and complexity of theoretical instruments, which is due to the growing complexity of the phenomena under study. The following sciences are based on previous, for example, methodical call chemistry, we must imply familiarity with physics, because all chemical phenomena are more complex than physical phenomena, also depend on them and have no influence on them. Similarly, science is classified as earlier, older and more advanced ones, which are presented as later. He called the encyclopedic law another universal law. Combining these laws, Comte developed a systemic and hierarchical classification of all sciences, including inorganic physics (astronomy, Earth science and chemistry) and organic physics (biology and, for the first time, physics, later renamed sociology). Regardless of The Introduction of the term by Emmanuel Joseph Xie in 1780, Comte Reso coined sociology and coined the term as a neologism in 1838. Comte had previously used the term social physics, but the term was coined by others, notably Adolf Kablelet. The most important thing to determine was the natural order in which science stand - not how they can be made to stand, but how they should stand, regardless of the wishes of anyone...
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Industrial Society and the State: French and German Perspectives
    Thomas HopkinsThomas Hopkins Page 1 [email protected] Between Restoration and Revolution, National Constitutions and Global Law: an alternative view on the European century 1815-1914. Thomas Hopkins Research Proposal Industrial Society and the State: French and German Perspectives The project I wish to outline is concerned on a general level with the problems involved in fitting together the concept of an exchange economy, potentially bounded by nothing save the projected extent of a global market, with that of the nation-state. This I take to be one way of formulating what is at stake in confronting the ‘language of economic efficiency’ with that of ‘social solidarity’, the second of the fields of tension identified for investigation as part of the overall research agenda. More particularly, I would like to re-examine some of the difficulties involved in framing the ‘social question’ in the 1830s and 1840s, and in so doing to ask why the concept of class should have proved so disruptive for political, social, legal and economic theory. My aim is not to rehearse the history of labour movements or to retread the well-worn path following the development of Marxism. Rather it is to place under scrutiny the apparent elective affinity between certain ways of thinking about economic development and the idea of representative government. This, I hope, should yield a more nuanced sense of what is in play in debates about the role of social legislation and the prospects for effective political management of the economy. I envisage two points of departure for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Damnation of Economics
    Notes 1. The Damnation of Economics 1. One example of vice-regal patronage of anti-economics is Canada’s ‘Governor General’s Award for Non-Fiction’. In 1995 this honour was bestowed upon John Raulston Saul’s anti-economic polemic The Unconscious Civilization (published in 1996). A taste of Saul’s wisdom: ‘Over the last quarter-century economics has raised itself to the level of a scientific profession and more or less foisted a Nobel Prize in its own honour onto the Nobel committee thanks to annual financing from a bank. Yet over the same 25 years, economics has been spectacularly unsuc- cessful in its attempts to apply its models and theories to the reality of our civili- sation’ (Saul 1996, p. 4). See Pusey (1991) and Cox (1995) for examples of patronage of anti-economics by Research Councils and Broadcasting Corporations. 2. Another example of economists’ ‘stillness’: the economists of 1860 did not join the numerous editorial rebukes of Ruskin’s anti-economics tracts (Anthony, 1983). 3. The anti-economist is not to be contrasted with the economist. An economist (that is, a person with a specialist knowledge of economics) may be an anti- economist. The true obverse of anti-economist is ‘philo-economist’: someone who holds that economics is a boon. 4. One may think of economics as a disease (as the anti-economist does), or one may think of economics as diseased. Mark Blaug: ‘Modern economics is “sick” . To para- phrase the title of a popular British musical: “No Reality, Please. We’re Economists”’ (Blaug 1998, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Order of the Prophets: Series in Early French Social Science and Socialism
    Hist. Sci., xlviii (2010) THE ORDER OF THE PROPHETS: SERIES IN EARLY FRENCH SOCIAL SCIENCE AND SOCIALISM John Tresch University of Pennsylvania Everything that can be thought by the mind or perceived by the senses is necessarily a series.1 According to the editors of an influential text in the history of social science, “in the first half of the nineteenth century the expression series seemed destined to a great philosophical future”.2 The expression itself seems to encourage speculation on destiny. Elements laid out in a temporal sequence ask to be continued through the addition of subsequent terms. “Series” were particularly prominent in the French Restoration and July Monarchy (1815–48) in works announcing a new social science. For example, the physician and republican conspirator J. P. B. Buchez, a former fol- lower of Henri de Saint-Simon who led a movement of Catholic social reform, made “series” central to his Introduction à la science de l’histoire. Mathematical series show a “progression”, not “a simple succession of unrelated numbers”; in human history, we discover two simultaneous series: “one growing, that of good; one diminishing, that of evil.” The inevitability of positive progress was confirmed by recent findings in physiology, zoology and geology. Correlations between the developmental stages of organisms, species, and the Earth were proof that humanity’s presence in the world “was no accident”, and that “labour, devotion and sacrifice” were part of the “universal order”. The “great law of progress” pointed toward a socialist republic in fulfilment both of scripture and of the promise of 1789.
    [Show full text]
  • Sismondi and His French Contemporaries
    1 SISMONDI AND HIS FRENCH CONTEMPORARIES HELMUT O. PAPPE I If Marx, himself an outstanding historian of economic doctrines, regarded Sismondi in 1848 as the head of a school of thought established in both France and England and, if Lenin still dreaded the influences of Sismondi's disciples half a century later, it does not appear evidently convincing that his work should have been completely neglected in the France of his day. On the contrary, there is, in the contemporaneous literature, ample attestation of the fact that he was deemed to be a very important figure indeed. Political economy as a scholarly discipline was still in its early stages at the time, primarily concerned with the school of the Physiocrats or 'Economists' from Quesnay and Turgot to Dupont de Nemours, and with the classical political economy of the followers of Adam Smith. There were soon attempts at taking stock of what had been achieved by precursors and recent writers. In England, John McCulloch sketched an historical account in 1824 which was soon translated into French by Sismondi's teacher Pierre Prevost.1 In France, after some early sketches in the 1770s, by Dupont de Nemours in his brilliant periodical Éphémérides du Citoyen, Jean-Baptiste Say gave an historical account in his Cours complet d'economie pretique of 1829.2 However, it was left to an Italian writer, Count Guiseppe Pecchio, to write the most systematic and influential History of Political Economy in Italy3 which was to serve as model to the French writers on the subject in the late 1830s.
    [Show full text]
  • Sismondi, Constant and Tocqueville
    1 SISMONDI, CONSTANT AND TOCQUEVILLE HELMUT O. PAPPE Edited by Richard Whatmore Editors introduction Hellmut Pappe died in 1998. Since the publication of Sismondi’s Weggenossen (Geneva, 1956), he had been planning a new biography of Sismondi intended both to replace J. R. Salis’s Sismondi, 1775-1842: la vie et l'oeuvre d'un cosmopolite philosophe (1932) and to give a fuller view of Sismondi’s influence, particularly over significant luminaries of nineteenth century European thought. Although Hellmut Pappe continued working until his death, his published work in this field was limited to a number of articles on Sismondi and editions of such works as the ‘Statitique du Departement du Leman’. Among the papers he left to the University of Sussex, however, were transcriptions of Sismondi’s mother and sister’s diaries, three chapters of the biography describing Sismondi’s life up to 1800, and some miscellaneous papers, destined for the second volume of the biography, describing Sismondi’s relationships with his contemporaries. The paper published here comes from the latter collection and appears to have been one of the last papers that Hellmutt Pappe completed. For reasons of brevity, the version of the paper published here omits the final section of the manuscript version, dealing with Sismondi’s view of North America, in addition to several of the more extensive notes. The paper underlines Pappe’s concern to restore Sismondi to the first rank of European political economists and historians. I Charles Dunoyer failed to mention Sismondi in his authoritative essay on the origin of industrialisation. It was Benjamin Constant whom he credited with having been the first writer who pointed out the veritable nature of modern society and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy Philippe Steiner
    Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy Philippe Steiner To cite this version: Philippe Steiner. Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy. 2015. halshs-01168341 HAL Id: halshs-01168341 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01168341 Preprint submitted on 25 Jun 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. GeWoPs Working papers du GEMASS Groupe d’étude des méthodes de l’Analyse sociologique de la Sorbonne Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy Philippe Steiner N°99 | june 2015 This paper is about Comte’s conception of altruism, and the role played by this new concept in his critique to political economy. In the first section, the paper consi- ders how selfish behaviour, or egoism, became treated as a major threat endangering the creation of indus- trial society by those concerned about the diffusion of political economy. Then, the paper summarizes the methodological critique set forth in the Cours, before connecting this critique to the economic content of the Système and the concept of altruism. In the final sec- tion, the paper contrasts Spencer’s view of altruism to that held by Comte, and then considers the reaction of French political economists, defending the moral value of their science.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Analysis of Three Early 19Th Century French Liberals: Say, Comte, and Dunoyer*
    THE SOCIAL ANALYSIS OF THREE EARLY 19TH CENTURY FRENCH LIBERALS: SAY, COMTE, AND DUNOYER* MARK WEINBURG Ueporlment of Hislory. University ofChica,?o The topic of this paper is the class theory of It was a vast social-historical treatise shaped and Jean-Baptiste Say (1767-1832). Charles Comte informed by the principles of political economy. (1782-1838) and Charles Dunoyer (1786-1862). It would be impossible to discuss the class However, in order to be fully accurate, this title theories of these men without examining their should be qualified in several respects. First, the view of history, their political ideas and most thinking of these men can not be examined in importantly their economic thought. In fact, the complete isolation, divorced from traditional main thesis of this paper is that a cogent, liberal ideas, the works of their contemporaries cohesive and vastly powerful social analysis was and the intellectual currents of the day. created with the fusion of liberal historical and Secondly, their class theories strictly speaking political thought with the economic orthodoxy cannot be separated from what we might now of Jean-Baptiste Say. consider the separate specializations of econom- An examination of any group of critical ics, history and political theory. This is the radicals, such as the French liberals of the nature of the times as well as in the nature of the Restoration and July Monarchy periods, subject. In the early 19th century, the social necessarily must address itself to three basic sciences had not developed in the sense which we questions. First, what was the primary liberal know them today.
    [Show full text]
  • Laissons Faire, Numéro 13, Octobre 2014
    Laissons Faire, Numéro 13, Octobre 2014 — 1 — Laissons Faire, Numéro 13, Octobre 2014 Laissons Faire revue mensuelle de l’Institut Coppet Rédacteur en chef : Benoît Malbranque, chercheur-associé, vice-président de l’Institut Coppet Éditeur : Damien Theillier, président de l’Institut Coppet, professeur de philosophie Comité d’honneur : Christian Michel, entrepreneur, essayiste, président de Libertarian International, directeur de l’International Society for Individual Liberty (ISIL) Robert Leroux, docteur en sciences sociales, professeur à l’Université d’Ottawa. Gérard Minart, journaliste et essayiste, ancien rédacteur en chef à La Voix du Nord. Auteur de biographies de Bastiat, J.-B. Say, et Molinari. David Hart, historien des idées, directeur du projet Online Library of Liberty (OLL) pour le Liberty Fund à Indianapolis aux USA. Mathieu Laine, avocat, essayiste, professeur à Sciences-Po, directeur d’Altermind Philippe Nemo, professeur de philosophie politique et sociale à l’ESCP-Europe (École Supérieure de Commerce de Paris), essayiste et historien des idées politiques. Alain Laurent, philosophe, essayiste et directeur des collections « Bibliothèque classique de la liberté » et « Penseurs de la liberté » aux éditions des Belles Lettres. Frédéric Sautet, docteur en économie, ancien professeur à New York University et à George Mason, il enseigne désormais à la Catholic University of America. Emmanuel Martin, docteur en économie, responsable du projet d’Atlas network «Libre Afrique » et directeur de l’Institute for Economic Studies – Europe
    [Show full text]
  • On Commercial Gluts, Or When the Saint-Simonians Adopted Jean-Baptiste Say’S View Adrien Lutz
    On commercial gluts, or when the Saint-Simonians adopted Jean-Baptiste Say’s view Adrien Lutz To cite this version: Adrien Lutz. On commercial gluts, or when the Saint-Simonians adopted Jean-Baptiste Say’s view. 2018. halshs-01963596 HAL Id: halshs-01963596 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01963596 Preprint submitted on 21 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. WP 1838 – December 2018 On commercial gluts, or when the Saint- Simonians adopted Jean-Baptiste Say’s view Adrien Lutz Abstract: A standard reading in the history of economic thought sets the classical stream of economists drawing upon the influence of Adam Smith (Jean-Baptiste Say, David Ricardo, etc.) in opposition to a “black box” of social thinkers (Louis Blanc, Fourierism, Saint-Simonianism, Sismondi, Robert Owen). This article, however, argues that, in the first quarter of the 19th century, the Saint-Simonians and the liberal economist Jean-Baptiste Say can be seen to adopt convergent views during the famous controversy about commercial gluts. First, we show that the Saint-Simonians and Say both see undersupply and lack of industry as causes of gluts.
    [Show full text]
  • French Political Economy and Positivism (Or How History of Economic Thought Became Mainstream Economics)
    ARTÍCULOS Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought ISSN-e 2386-5768 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/IJHE.58093 French Political Economy and Positivism (or how history of economic thought became mainstream economics) Christophe Salvat1 Received: 21/07/2015 / Accepted: 02/03/2016 Abstract. This paper deals with French political economy under the Second Empire. It suggests that having been seriously weakened by internal dissents over the suitability of the historical method in economics, French political economy managed to reinvent itself during the last decade of Napoléon III’s reign. Threatened by the emperor’s personal suspicion towards free trade and the intellectual domination of positivism, economists experienced in the 1850s one of the most difficult periods in their history. Yet, a decade later the tables seem to have turned. The institutional changes, brought forward by Victor Duruy, and the intellectual ascendance gained by economists such as Baudrillart, Wolowski or Dunoyer contributed to modernize and legitimize the outmoded and unimaginative political economy inherited from Say. They notably found in the history of economic thought a way to comply with the positive standards of the time but also to give back to political economy the respectability it had lost. Keywords: positivism; political economy; Romanticism; Saint-Simonianism JEL Classification: B10 [es] La Economía Política Francesa y el Positivismo (o cómo la historia del pensamiento económico se hizo ortodoxia económica) Resumen. Este artículo estudia la Economía Política francesa bajo el Segundo Imperio. Sugiere que, habiendo quedado seriamente debilitada por las disensiones internas sobre la conveniencia de utilizar el método histórico en economía, la Economía Política francesa logró reinventarse durante la última década del reinado de Napoleón III.
    [Show full text]
  • “The School of Liberty” (1890) Frédéric Passy
    Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 20, Number 2 (Fall 2017): 413–469 Copyright © 2017 “The School of Liberty” (1890) Frédéric Passy Passy’s Preface to the Guillaumin Edition With these few words, I would like to familiarize the reader with the origin and the nature of the work he is about to read.1 The Swiss Christian Society of Social Economy, presided over with rare distinc- tion by Frédéric Necker,2 had the original and interesting idea of bringing before the Genevan public, representatives from the main schools of economic thought. I had the honor of being called to speak on behalf of the School of Liberty. Coming last after Claudio Jannet who gave a masterful talk on Le Play’s doctrine, after Gaston Stiegler, a serious and official defender of collectivist ideas, after Charles Gide at the end, who, with superb talent and some partiality 1 This preface to the Lecture was inserted in Passy’s own edition of his speech, which was published by Guillaumin as a separate pamphlet designed to be circulated among the supporters of the liberal political economists in Paris. L’École de la liberté. Conférence faite à Genève le 9 Avril 1890 par M. Frédéric Passy, Membre de l’Institut (Paris: Guillaumin, 1890), 84. The actual speeches are the same, so in the footnotes we will cite the original edition published by the conference organizers. 2 Possibly a relative of Jacques Necker (1732–1804), who was a Swiss-born banker and politician who served as the minister of finance under Louis XVI just before the French Revolution broke out.
    [Show full text]
  • On Commercial Gluts, Or When the Saint- Simonians Adopted Jean-Baptiste Say’S View
    WP 1838 – December 2018 On commercial gluts, or when the Saint- Simonians adopted Jean-Baptiste Say’s view Adrien Lutz Abstract: A standard reading in the history of economic thought sets the classical stream of economists drawing upon the influence of Adam Smith (Jean-Baptiste Say, David Ricardo, etc.) in opposition to a “black box” of social thinkers (Louis Blanc, Fourierism, Saint-Simonianism, Sismondi, Robert Owen). This article, however, argues that, in the first quarter of the 19th century, the Saint-Simonians and the liberal economist Jean-Baptiste Say can be seen to adopt convergent views during the famous controversy about commercial gluts. First, we show that the Saint-Simonians and Say both see undersupply and lack of industry as causes of gluts. Next, we assert that their intellectual affinities are also visible in their belief that increasing production remains an appropriate solution for gluts. Finally, this convergence is explained by their common belief in industrialism: Saint-Simonianism is embedded in a French industrialist tradition for which Say can be taken as representative. We argue that their common belief in industry explains their convergence. Keywords: Saint-Simonianism, Jean-Baptiste Say, Adam Smith, Laissez-faire, Commercial gluts JEL codes: B10, E5, N00 LUTZ Adrien1 - On commercial gluts, or when the Saint-Simonians adopted Jean-Baptiste Say’s view A standard reading in the history of economic thought sets the classical stream of economists drawing upon the influence of Adam Smith (Jean-Baptiste Say, David Ricardo, etc.) in opposition to a “black box” of social thinkers (Louis Blanc, Fourierism, Saint-Simonianism, Sismondi, Robert Owen).
    [Show full text]