DOCSLIB.ORG

Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy Philippe Steiner

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy Philippe Steiner Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy Philippe Steiner To cite this version: Philippe Steiner. Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy. 2015. halshs-01168341 HAL Id: halshs-01168341 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01168341 Preprint submitted on 25 Jun 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. GeWoPs Working papers du GEMASS Groupe d’étude des méthodes de l’Analyse sociologique de la Sorbonne Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy Philippe Steiner N°99 | june 2015 This paper is about Comte’s conception of altruism, and the role played by this new concept in his critique to political economy. In the first section, the paper consi- ders how selfish behaviour, or egoism, became treated as a major threat endangering the creation of indus- trial society by those concerned about the diffusion of political economy. Then, the paper summarizes the methodological critique set forth in the Cours, before connecting this critique to the economic content of the Système and the concept of altruism. In the final sec- tion, the paper contrasts Spencer’s view of altruism to that held by Comte, and then considers the reaction of French political economists, defending the moral value of their science. Working Papers Series Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme - 190 avenue de France - 75013 Paris - France http://www.fmsh.fr - FMSH-WP-2015-99 Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy 2/20 Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy Philippe Steiner June 2015 The author Philippe Steiner est professeur de sociologie à l’université Paris-Sorbonne et membre de l’Institut uni- versitaire de France. Chercheur au GEMASS, il conduit ses recherches sur la sociologie économique et l’histoire des sciences sociales. Il a récemment publié en collaboration avec Caroline Oudin-Bastide, Calcul et morale. Le coût de l’esclavage et la valeur de l’émancipation (Albin Michel, 2015) et a co-dirigé avec Marie Trespeuch Marchés contestés. Quand le marché rencontre la morale (Presses universitaires du Mirail, 2015). The text This text was written in the frame of the GEMASS (Groupe d’étude des méthodes de l’Analyse socio- logique de la Sorbonne) and was submitted to History of Political Economy. Citing this document Philippe Steiner, Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy, FMSH-WP-2015-99, GeWoP-8, june 2015. Les Working Papers et les Position Papers de The Working Papers and Position Papers of la Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme the FMSH are produced in the course of ont pour objectif la diffusion ouverte des tra- the scientific activities of the FMSH: the © Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme - 2015 vaux en train de se faire dans le cadre des chairs of the Institute for Global Studies, diverses activités scientifiques de la Fonda- Fernand Braudel-IFER grants, the Founda- Informations et soumission des textes : tion : Le Collège d’études mondiales, Bourses tion’s scientific programmes, or the scholars [email protected] Fernand Braudel-IFER, Programmes scien- hosted at the Maison Suger or as associate tifiques, hébergement à la Maison Suger, research directors. Working Papers may also Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme Séminaires et Centres associés, Directeurs be produced in partnership with affiliated 190-196 avenue de France d’études associés... institutions. 75013 Paris - France Les opinions exprimées dans cet article n’en- The views expressed in this paper are the http://www.fmsh.fr gagent que leur auteur et ne reflètent pas author’s own and do not necessarily reflect http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/FMSH-WP nécessairement les positions institutionnelles institutional positions from the Foundation http://wpfmsh.hypotheses.org de la Fondation MSH. MSH. Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme - 190 avenue de France - 75013 Paris - France http://www.fmsh.fr - FMSH-WP-2015-99 Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy 3/20 Abstract This paper is about Comte’s conception of altruism, and the role played by this new concept in his cri- tique to political economy. In the first section, the paper considers how selfish behaviour, or egoism, became treated as a major threat endangering the creation of industrial society by those concerned about the diffusion of political economy. Then, the paper summarizes the methodological critique set forth in the Cours, before connecting this critique to the economic content of the Système and the concept of altruism. In the final section, the paper contrasts Spencer’s view of altruism to that held by Comte, and then considers the reaction of French political economists, defending the moral value of their science. Keywords altruism, Comte, egoism, political economy, Spencer Comte, l’altruisme et la critique de l’économie politique Résumé Cet article examine la manière dont Auguste Comte introduit la notion d’altruisme dans sa critique sociologique de l’économie politique. La première partie de l’article explique pourquoi l’égoïsme et la dif- fusion de l’économie politique étaient considérés par lui comme de graves menaces pesant sur la mise en place de la société industrielle. Dans la deuxième partie, l’article rappelle la critique méthodologique que Comte expose dans son Cours de philosophie positive, puis montre le lien avec les considérations qu’il développe à propos de l’altruisme dans son Système de politique positive. La dernière partie contraste les conceptions de l’altruisme proposées par Comte puis par Herbert Spencer, et rappelle comment les économistes ont taché de répondre à Comte. Mots-clefs altruisme, Comte, économie politique, égoïsme, Spencer Sommaire Egoism, benevolence and justice 5 From the methodological critique of Political Economy to Altruism as a counterforce to egoism 7 The methodological critique 7 Herbert Spencer, French Economists and Altruism 13 Spencer and the conciliation approach 13 Altruism, self-interest and French economic liberalism 16 Concluding remarks 18 References 18 Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme - 190 avenue de France - 75013 Paris - France http://www.fmsh.fr - FMSH-WP-2015-99 Comte, Altruism and the Critique of Political Economy 4/20 uguste Comte’s work is not thought Comte’s religious views as a key his post-theis- to form a significant contribution tic social theory, to use Andrew Wernick’s words, to political economy, although his and to the economic organization that should be methodological critique of political brought into being by the “sociocracy”, a new reli- economy had some influence during the second gious elite spreading the credo of the religion of Ahalf of the nineteenth century, when the histori- Humanity. Secondly, Comte’s later works repay cal school challenged the more abstract concep- attention, since this is where altruism, a new word tion of political economy then gaining momen- in the French language, was established. Altruism tum.1 If Comte’s critique is considered to be of is now a concept commonly used by economists. minor interest, then the second part of Comte’s However, this was not Comte’s intention when he intellectual career, dominated by the develop- coined the word in the mid-nineteenth century to ment of his religion of humanity, is entirely over- counter the idea that human action had a selfish looked. For example, John Stuart Mill considered foundation, an idea which he and many other Comte’s Cours de philosophie positive to be a signi- social observers saw as pervasive in an industrial ficant contribution to the philosophy of science, society. By focussing his attention on the opposi- whereas he considered his later work, dominated tion between egoism and altruism, an opposition by the Système de politique positive, to be a point- deemed to be the “great human issue”, Comte was less enterprise, tainted by a regulatory mania not merely elaborating his own system of thought emanating from the pen of “a morally-intoxicated in terms of a so-called “subjective approach”, and man” (Mill 1865: 336). As scientist-philosopher, by developing the religion of humanity at the heart Comte is therefore considered to be of limited of his Catéchisme positiviste (Comte 1852) and his interest to historians of economic thought;2 and Système de politique positive (Comte 1851-54). He as a religious thinker, he is of no interest to them also extended his critique to political economy, at all. Conversely, historians of the social sciences exposed in the 47th lecture of his Cours de philo- take no interest in the economic content of his sophie positive (1830-42). I would like to demons- social and religious thought.3 trate in this article that there is a strong connec- tion between the first and second parts of Comte’s There are two reasons for challenging this situa- works, where the critique of political economy is tion. Firstly, there is now a growing interest in at issue. Comte’s theory of altruism is certainly a the religious underpinnings of political economy, key point of his religious credo, but it is also a spe- treating it as a political discourse whose scope cific response to a matter of common concern for extended far beyond the strictly economic domain. French social scientists, for whom the new social This is especially evident in France (Faccarello and order, or industrial society, lacked adequate cultu- Steiner 2008), given the political and social role ral foundations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Industrial Society and the State: French and German Perspectives
    Thomas HopkinsThomas Hopkins Page 1 [email protected] Between Restoration and Revolution, National Constitutions and Global Law: an alternative view on the European century 1815-1914. Thomas Hopkins Research Proposal Industrial Society and the State: French and German Perspectives The project I wish to outline is concerned on a general level with the problems involved in fitting together the concept of an exchange economy, potentially bounded by nothing save the projected extent of a global market, with that of the nation-state. This I take to be one way of formulating what is at stake in confronting the ‘language of economic efficiency’ with that of ‘social solidarity’, the second of the fields of tension identified for investigation as part of the overall research agenda. More particularly, I would like to re-examine some of the difficulties involved in framing the ‘social question’ in the 1830s and 1840s, and in so doing to ask why the concept of class should have proved so disruptive for political, social, legal and economic theory. My aim is not to rehearse the history of labour movements or to retread the well-worn path following the development of Marxism. Rather it is to place under scrutiny the apparent elective affinity between certain ways of thinking about economic development and the idea of representative government. This, I hope, should yield a more nuanced sense of what is in play in debates about the role of social legislation and the prospects for effective political management of the economy. I envisage two points of departure for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Murray N. Rothbard's an Austrian
    Reason Papers 97 Murray N. Rothbard, An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought, Vol. i & ii (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ., Ltd., 1995), pp.576 & 544; Index; $99.95 each. Parth Shah, University of Michigan, Dearborn I have always enjoyed Professor Rothbard's talks at various Austrian conferences and seminars, especially the ones on the history of economic thought. That subject itself, I think, brought out all the qualities that made Professor Rothbard such a loving and towering figure in Austrian and libertarian circles; his incredible breadth of knowledge, diligent scholarship, disarming sense of humor, perspective coalescing of personal with social and intellectual history, genuine respect for a worthy adversary, and yes, his unwavering dedication to praxeology and liberty. Professor Rothbard's two volumes on the history of thought more than meet the expectations; they encapsulate all those unique qualities of his. It makes it all the more unfortunate that the volumes cover the period only up to about 1870. Taking his cue from his mentor Joseph Dorfman, Professor Rothbard eschews the "Few Great Men approach" (talking about the already anointed), and focuses on the "'lesser' figures... emphasizing the importance of their religious and social philosophies as well as their narrower strictly 'economic' views" (1, p.xii). With Thomas Kuhn's realistic appraisal of the path of progress in science in terms of paradigm shifts, Professor Rothbard dismisses the Whig theory of history and works with no presumption that "later thought is better than earlier" (1, p.x). The acceptance of the zig-zag path of the progress of the discipline promises us "far more human drama than is usually offered in histories of economic thought." (1, p.xiii).
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Damnation of Economics
    Notes 1. The Damnation of Economics 1. One example of vice-regal patronage of anti-economics is Canada’s ‘Governor General’s Award for Non-Fiction’. In 1995 this honour was bestowed upon John Raulston Saul’s anti-economic polemic The Unconscious Civilization (published in 1996). A taste of Saul’s wisdom: ‘Over the last quarter-century economics has raised itself to the level of a scientific profession and more or less foisted a Nobel Prize in its own honour onto the Nobel committee thanks to annual financing from a bank. Yet over the same 25 years, economics has been spectacularly unsuc- cessful in its attempts to apply its models and theories to the reality of our civili- sation’ (Saul 1996, p. 4). See Pusey (1991) and Cox (1995) for examples of patronage of anti-economics by Research Councils and Broadcasting Corporations. 2. Another example of economists’ ‘stillness’: the economists of 1860 did not join the numerous editorial rebukes of Ruskin’s anti-economics tracts (Anthony, 1983). 3. The anti-economist is not to be contrasted with the economist. An economist (that is, a person with a specialist knowledge of economics) may be an anti- economist. The true obverse of anti-economist is ‘philo-economist’: someone who holds that economics is a boon. 4. One may think of economics as a disease (as the anti-economist does), or one may think of economics as diseased. Mark Blaug: ‘Modern economics is “sick” . To para- phrase the title of a popular British musical: “No Reality, Please. We’re Economists”’ (Blaug 1998, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Roderick Long Charles Johnson 27 December 2004
    Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Roderick Long Charles Johnson 27 December 2004 Let's start with what this essay will do, and what it will not. We are both convinced of, and this essay will take more or less for granted, that the political traditions of libertarianism and feminism are both in the main correct, insightful, and of the first importance in any struggle to build a just, free, and compassionate society. We do not intend to try to justify the import of either tradition on the other's terms, nor prove the correctness or insightfulness of the non- aggression principle, the libertarian critique of state coercion, the reality and pervasiveness of male violence and discrimination against women, or the feminist critique of patriarchy. Those are important conversations to have, but we won't have them here; they are better found in the foundational works that have already been written within the feminist and libertarian traditions. The aim here is not to set down doctrine or refute heresy; it's to get clear on how to reconcile commitments to both libertarianism and feminism—although in reconciling them we may remove some of the reasons that people have had for resisting libertarian or feminist conclusions. Libertarianism and feminism, when they have encountered each other, have most often taken each other for polar opposites. Many 20th century libertarians have dismissed or attacked feminism—when they have addressed it at all—as just another wing of Left-wing statism; many feminists have dismissed or attacked libertarianism—when they have addressed it at all—as either Angry White Male reaction or an extreme faction of the ideology of the liberal capitalist state.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty, Property and Rationality
    Liberty, Property and Rationality Concept of Freedom in Murray Rothbard’s Anarcho-capitalism Master’s Thesis Hannu Hästbacka 13.11.2018 University of Helsinki Faculty of Arts General History Tiedekunta/Osasto – Fakultet/Sektion – Faculty Laitos – Institution – Department Humanistinen tiedekunta Filosofian, historian, kulttuurin ja taiteiden tutkimuksen laitos Tekijä – Författare – Author Hannu Hästbacka Työn nimi – Arbetets titel – Title Liberty, Property and Rationality. Concept of Freedom in Murray Rothbard’s Anarcho-capitalism Oppiaine – Läroämne – Subject Yleinen historia Työn laji – Arbetets art – Level Aika – Datum – Month and Sivumäärä– Sidoantal – Number of pages Pro gradu -tutkielma year 100 13.11.2018 Tiivistelmä – Referat – Abstract Murray Rothbard (1926–1995) on yksi keskeisimmistä modernin libertarismin taustalla olevista ajattelijoista. Rothbard pitää yksilöllistä vapautta keskeisimpänä periaatteenaan, ja yhdistää filosofiassaan klassisen liberalismin perinnettä itävaltalaiseen taloustieteeseen, teleologiseen luonnonoikeusajatteluun sekä individualistiseen anarkismiin. Hänen tavoitteenaan on kehittää puhtaaseen järkeen pohjautuva oikeusoppi, jonka pohjalta voidaan perustaa vapaiden markkinoiden ihanneyhteiskunta. Valtiota ei täten Rothbardin ihanneyhteiskunnassa ole, vaan vastuu yksilöllisten luonnonoikeuksien toteutumisesta on kokonaan yksilöllä itsellään. Tutkin työssäni vapauden käsitettä Rothbardin anarko-kapitalistisessa filosofiassa. Selvitän ja analysoin Rothbardin ajattelun keskeisimpiä elementtejä niiden filosofisissa,
    [Show full text]
  • The Order of the Prophets: Series in Early French Social Science and Socialism
    Hist. Sci., xlviii (2010) THE ORDER OF THE PROPHETS: SERIES IN EARLY FRENCH SOCIAL SCIENCE AND SOCIALISM John Tresch University of Pennsylvania Everything that can be thought by the mind or perceived by the senses is necessarily a series.1 According to the editors of an influential text in the history of social science, “in the first half of the nineteenth century the expression series seemed destined to a great philosophical future”.2 The expression itself seems to encourage speculation on destiny. Elements laid out in a temporal sequence ask to be continued through the addition of subsequent terms. “Series” were particularly prominent in the French Restoration and July Monarchy (1815–48) in works announcing a new social science. For example, the physician and republican conspirator J. P. B. Buchez, a former fol- lower of Henri de Saint-Simon who led a movement of Catholic social reform, made “series” central to his Introduction à la science de l’histoire. Mathematical series show a “progression”, not “a simple succession of unrelated numbers”; in human history, we discover two simultaneous series: “one growing, that of good; one diminishing, that of evil.” The inevitability of positive progress was confirmed by recent findings in physiology, zoology and geology. Correlations between the developmental stages of organisms, species, and the Earth were proof that humanity’s presence in the world “was no accident”, and that “labour, devotion and sacrifice” were part of the “universal order”. The “great law of progress” pointed toward a socialist republic in fulfilment both of scripture and of the promise of 1789.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Liberalism and the Austrian School
    Classical Liberalism and the Austrian School Classical Liberalism and the Austrian School Ralph Raico Foreword by Jörg Guido Hülsmann Preface by David Gordon LvMI MISES INSTITUTE The cover design by Chad Parish shows the Neptune Fountain, at the Schönbrunn Palace, in Vienna. Copyright © 2012 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given. Ludwig von Mises Institute 518 West Magnolia Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36832 mises.org ISBN: 978-1-61016-003-2 Dedicated to the memory of the great Ludwig von Mises Table of Contents Foreword by Jörg Guido Hülsmann . ix Preface by David Gordon . xiii Introduction . .xxv 1. Classical Liberalism and the Austrian School . .1 2. Liberalism: True and False . .67 3. Intellectuals and the Marketplace. 111 4. Was Keynes a Liberal? . .149 5. The Conflict of Classes: Liberal vs. Marxist Theories. .183 6. The Centrality of French Liberalism . .219 7. Ludwig von Mises’s Liberalism on Fascism, Democracy, and Imperalism . .255 8. Eugen Richter and the End of German Liberalism. .301 9. Arthur Ekirch on American Militarism . .331 Index. .339 vii Foreword “History looks backward into the past, but the lesson it teaches concerns things to come. It does not teach indolent quietism; it rouses man to emulate the deeds of earlier generations.” Ludwig von Mises1 The present book contains a collection of essays written through- out the past twenty years. I read virtually all of them when they were first published. They have been a central part of my education in the history of liberalism and of the Austrian School of economics, and I consider myself privileged indeed to have encountered Professor Raico and his work early on in my intellectual development.
    [Show full text]
  • Sismondi and His French Contemporaries
    1 SISMONDI AND HIS FRENCH CONTEMPORARIES HELMUT O. PAPPE I If Marx, himself an outstanding historian of economic doctrines, regarded Sismondi in 1848 as the head of a school of thought established in both France and England and, if Lenin still dreaded the influences of Sismondi's disciples half a century later, it does not appear evidently convincing that his work should have been completely neglected in the France of his day. On the contrary, there is, in the contemporaneous literature, ample attestation of the fact that he was deemed to be a very important figure indeed. Political economy as a scholarly discipline was still in its early stages at the time, primarily concerned with the school of the Physiocrats or 'Economists' from Quesnay and Turgot to Dupont de Nemours, and with the classical political economy of the followers of Adam Smith. There were soon attempts at taking stock of what had been achieved by precursors and recent writers. In England, John McCulloch sketched an historical account in 1824 which was soon translated into French by Sismondi's teacher Pierre Prevost.1 In France, after some early sketches in the 1770s, by Dupont de Nemours in his brilliant periodical Éphémérides du Citoyen, Jean-Baptiste Say gave an historical account in his Cours complet d'economie pretique of 1829.2 However, it was left to an Italian writer, Count Guiseppe Pecchio, to write the most systematic and influential History of Political Economy in Italy3 which was to serve as model to the French writers on the subject in the late 1830s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of National Defense, Hoppe
    THE MYTH OF NATIONAL DEFENSE: ESSAYSONTHE THEORY AND HISTORY OF SECURITY PRODUCTION EDITED BY HANS-HERMANN HOPPE THE MYTH OF NATIONAL DEFENSE: ESSAYSONTHE THEORY AND HISTORY OF SECURITY PRODUCTION Copyright © 2003 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute Indexes prepared by Brad Edmonds All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of reprints in the context of reviews. For information write the Ludwig von Mises Institute, 518 West Magnolia Avenue, Auburn, Alabama 36832. ISBN: 0-945466-37-4 To the memory of Gustave de Molinari (1819–1911) Patrons The Mises Institute dedicates this volume to all of its generous donors, and in particular wishes to thank these Patrons: Don Printz, M.D., Mrs. Floy Johnson, Mr. and Mrs. R. Nelson Nash, Mr. Abe Siemens ^ Mr. Steven R. Berger, Mr. Douglas E. French, Mr. and Mrs. Richard D. Riemann (top dog™), Mr. and Mrs. Joseph P. Schirrick, Mr. and Mrs. Charles R. Sebrell, In memory of Jeannette Zummo, Mr. W.A. Richardson ^ Anonymous, Mr. Steven R. Berger, Mr. Richard Bleiberg, Mr. John Hamilton Bolstad, Mr. Herbert Borbe, Mr. and Mrs. John C. Cooke, Dr. Larry J. Eshelman, Bud Evans (Harley-Davidson of Reno), Mrs. Annabelle Fetterman, Mr. and Mrs. Willard Fischer, The Dolphin Sky Foundation, Mr. Frank W. Heemstra, Mr. Albert L. Hillman, Jr., Richard J. Kossmann, M.D., Mrs. Sarah Paris Kraft, Mr. David Kramer, Mr. Frederick L. Maier, Mr. and Mrs. William W. Massey, Jr., Mr. Norbert McLuckie, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas of Expertise and Scholarly Activity (PDF)
    Areas of my Expertise and Scholarly Activity David M. Hart Date: 23 Oct. 2019 Summary I have expertise in the following areas: I. Website Design and the display of Digital Texts: 1. the design of a sophisticated, award-winning academic website for the storage, manipulation, and distribution of complex texts 2. the design of search and citation tools to assist scholars in making use of the online texts in their research 3. the creation of metadata to organise the online material and to show the interconnections between the texts and authors 4. the creation of educational resources to assist teachers and students in understanding the texts II. The Great Books of Liberty: 1. the organisation and presentation of texts which are part of the “great books”, in particular the subset of these which are known as “the great books of liberty” 2. the creation of teaching and study guides in order to help readers understand the texts 3. the creation of a forum for academic experts in the great books to discuss these texts and make this discussion available to professors and students in multiple formats III. The History of the Classical Liberal Tradition I am an active researcher in several fields, including 1. the history of the classical liberal tradition with a focus on the 17th century English Levellers, 19th century French political economy, and American radical individualists 2. the history of economic thought 3. classical liberal class analysis 4. the politics of art and film This research has produced the following: 1. several collections of the works of unjustly neglected political and economic thinkers, including Frédéric Bastiat, Gustave de Molinari, James Mill, Lysander Spooner, Thomas Gordon, and a multi-volume collection of 17th century Leveller tracts 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Production of Security
    The Production of Security Gustave de Molinari Translation by J. Huston McCulloch This essay was originally published as “De la production de la sécurité,” in Journal des Economistes (February 1849): 277–90. This translation by was originally published as Gustave de Molinari, The Production of Security, trans. J. Huston McCulloch, Occasional Papers Series #2 , Richard M. Ebeling, ed. (New York: The Center for Libertarian Studies, May 1977). © 2009 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute and published under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Ludwig von Mises Institute 518 West Magnolia Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36832 www.mises.org ISBN: 978-1-933550-57-2 The interests of the consumer of any commodity whatsoever should always prevail over the interests of the producer. — Gustave de Molinari C O N T E N T S Preface by Murray N. Rothbard. 9 The Production of Security . 15 The Natural Order of Society. 17 Competition in Security?. .22 Security an Exception?. 25 The Alternatives. 27 Monopoly and Communism . 29 The Monopolization and Collectivization of the Security Industry. 33 Government and Society. .41 The Divine Right of Kings and Majorities . 43 The Regime of Terror. 51 The Free Market for Security . 53 7 The Production of Security 9 Preface By Murray N. Rothbard (1977) ever has laissez-faire thought been as dominant as it was among NFrench economists, beginning with J.B. Say in the early nineteenth cen- tury, down through Say’s more advanced followers Charles Comte and Charles Dunoyer and to the early years of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Frederic Bastiat
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 PREDECESSORS Frédéric Bastiat: Libertarian Challenger or Political Bargainer? ✦ BRIAN BAUGUS ocial thinkers and scholars tend to moderate their beliefs, especially their most radical beliefs, as they age. Many who begin their careers as radical libertarians, Schallenging the status quo and extensive state power, tire over time or realize that holding such views obstructs their careers. Hence, they moderate their views or compromise their most radical ideas, at least publicly, and express greater support for incrementalism and working within the established system.
    [Show full text]