DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA DATE: MAY15,2019 To: Chair Mc Dermott and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director� FROM: Monique Schwartz, Associate Planner-«\r SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW NO. 4962-18-ALDI
SUMMARY
The applicant is proposing to convert an existing Staples retail store to an ALDI grocery store and two vacant tenant spaces, with minor site modifications.
RECOMMENDED ACTION - FINAL DETERMINATION Staff is requesting final determination from the Design Review Committee (DRC) concerning the exterior building facade design of the ALDI grocery store and two adjacent tenant spaces. Should the DRC approve the project, Staff has included required findings and recommended conditions of approval as Attachment 4 to this report.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION Applicant: ALDI I Matthew Baca Owner: Property Location: 2050 North Tustin Street General Plan Designation: General Commercial Max 1.0 FAR (GC) Zoning Classification: Limited Business Tustin Redevelopment Project Area (C-TR) Existing Development: Orange Villa Shopping Center and related site improvements Property Size: 6.19 Acres (269,636 square feet) Associated Applications: None Previous DRC Review: The project received a preliminary review from the DRC on March 20, 2019. Meeting minutes are provided as Attachment 2, and the Applicant's responses to comments from the March 20, 2019 meeting are provided as Attachment 3 to this report.
PUBLIC NOTICE
No Public Notice was required given the nature of the proposed facade improvements. Design Review Committee Staff Report May 15, 2019 Page 2 of6
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Categorical Exemption: The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines 15301 (Class 1 - Existing Facilities) because the project consists of the conversion of an existing retail store to a retail grocery store and two adjacent tenant spaces. There is no environmental public review or notice required for a categorical exemption.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to convert an existing 24,087 square foot Staples retail store into a 20,715 square foot ALDI grocery store and two adjacent vacant tenant spaces (Tenant Space #1= 1,452 square feet and Tenant Space #2 = 1,302 square feet). Similar to Staples, ALDI will be an anchor tenant within the shopping center, with a center location and clear visibility from the north Tustin Street right-of-way. The project proposes exterior facade changes to reflect the ALDI branding and minor site improvements, including the widening of an existing concrete walkway in front of the ALDI tenant space to accommodate a shopping cart storage area and pedestrian walkway, a one-foot reduction in drive aisle width to accommodate the widened walkway, and American with Disability Act (ADA) access/parking improvements. The property's existing driveways, landscaping, trash enclosure and loading dock will remain unchanged.
The ALDI grocery store interior will be configured with the main entrance at the northeast corner of the building, and exits along the north and south sides of the tenant space. The applicant is also proposing an exterior shopping cart storage area along the building frontage, south of the main entrance. The new adjacent tenant suites will have the main entries/exits located along the east side of the tenant spaces.
It is important to note that signage for the project is included for illustrative purposes only and is not included in this proposal. Proposed project signage will be subject to the requirements of the existing sign program for the shopping center and the City's sign regulations.
EXISTING SITE
The Orange Villa Shopping Center is located on the west side of North Tustin Street, at the southwest corner of Tustin Street and Meats Avenue . The site is comprised of multiple parcels totaling approximately 6.19 acres and is developed with an 84,670 square foot retail in-line shopping center. Existing businesses within the center include Staples, Bev Mo, Turner's Outdoorsman, Zita's Pizza, French's Bakery, Zena's and Subway restaurants to name a few. Existing on-site improvements include four multi-tenant ground signs, driveway entrances/exits along Meats Avenue and North Tustin Street, landscaping, trash enclosure, loading dock, and 373 surface parking spaces on the front, side and rear of the shopping center.
AREA CONTEXT
The site is presently developed with a one and two-story in-line retail shopping center, associated surface parking, and on site landscaping. The shopping center was originally constructed in the Design Review Committee Staff Report May 15, 2019 Page 3 o/6 mid 1960's and the exterior facade was remodeled in 1999. To the north of the project site is The Village at Orange shopping mall. To the south is the Tustin Square commercial retail and office center. To the east, across Tustin Street is an in-line commercial retail shopping center, the Villa Park Motel, Trends Fireplace and Patio Store, Rapids Express Car Wash, and Polly's Pies Restaurant. To the west are multi-familyresidential apartment complexes. The architecture of the surrounding development along Tustin Street is eclectic and typical of commercial development dating from the 1960's though the 1980's, with the exception of the recently constructed Rapids Express Car Wash which utilized "packaged" or "brand" architecture, located at 2045 N. Tustin Street, and the Village at Orange facade remodel which was completed in 2017, located at 1500 E. Village Way.
EVALUATION CRITERIA Orange Municipal Code (OMC) Section 17.10.070 establishes the general criteria the Design Review Committee should use when reviewing the project. This section states the following:
The project shall have an internally consistent, integrated design theme, which is reflected in the following elements:
1. Architectural Features. a. The architectural features shall reflect a similar design style or period. b. Creative building elements and identifying features should be used to create a high quality project with visual interest and an architectural style. 2. Landscape. a. The type, size and location of landscape materials shall supportthe project's overall design concept. b. Landscaping shall not obstruct visibility of required addressing, nor shall it obstruct the vision of motorists or pedestrians in proximity to the site. c. Landscape areas shall be provided in and around parking lots to break up the appearance of large expanses of hardscape. 3. Signage. All signage shall be compatible with the building(s) design, scale, colors, materials and lighting. 4. Secondary Functional and Accessory Features. Trash receptacles, storage and loading areas, transformers and mechanical equipment shall be screened in a manner, which is architecturally compatible with the principal building(s).
ANALYSIS/STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES
Issue 1: Architecture
The existing Orange Villa shopping center features a simple contemporary design that includes flat rooflines, vertical columns, and raised horizontal trim detailing. The larger anchor tenants display more individualityin their storefront designs, including stepped rooflines, eyebrow arches, Design Review Committee Staff Report May 15, 2019 Page4 of6 fabric window awnings, and two-story design. Materials used throughout the center include painted stucco, terracotta "S" style roof tiles, and an aluminum storefront system. The overall color scheme incorporates shades of tan, brown, terra cotta, and various shades of fabric window awnings.
The proposed ALDI facade remodel will encompass approximately 108 lineal feet of building frontage at the center of the shopping center. The new exterior design will feature a modem aesthetic with a stepped flat roof design at 30 feet tall and contemporary materials and colors that reflect the ALDI branding, including fiber cement wood panel siding, aluminumcomposite panels arranged in a grid pattern, aluminum composite panel canopy, aluminum store front system, and tuff block cart storage screen wall. The exterior color scheme incorporates shades of brown and silver. For illustrative purposes, the applicant has included conceptual signage, which proposes window graphics extending to the full height of the building on the north side of the store's main entrance and an 8-foot by 9.5-foot wall sign. Both window graphics and wall signage are not included in this proposal, but will be subject to the requirements of the existing sign program for the shopping center and the City's sign regulations.
The two new vacant tenant spaces to the south of the ALDI grocery store will encompass approximately 40 lineal feet of building frontage. The exterior facade design will match the existing building elevations, incorporating a gable roof design, vertical columns, and raised horizontal trim detailing. Building materials include painted stucco, terracotta "S" tile roof tiles, and aluminum storefront system. The exterior color scheme will be tan, brown, and terra cotta to match the existing building.
Preliminary Design Review Committee Feedback:
On March 20, 2019, the DRC conducted a preliminary review of the project design. At that time, the Committee had a favorable response to the project, however did not feel that the project worked within the existing shopping center context. The DRC provided feedback to the applicant regarding the issues discussed in this report. Final Minutes of this meeting and the Applicant's response to comments are included as Attachments 2 and 3 to this report. The DRC comments regarding the ALDI exterior building design are as follows:
• The project is successful in emulating the mall; however, the design does not work in the existing shopping center context.
• The Committee commented on the placement of the columns and doors.
• The innovative architecture clashes with the design of the existing shopping center.
• The Committee wanted to see an internally consistent integrated design theme, and suggested that the applicant could maintain similar forms and change the materials, or maintain similar materials and change the form and still have a link to the existing design of the shopping center. Rather than changing both form and material, the use of a stepped roof instead of a shed roof would better tie the forms. Design Review Committee Staff Report May 15, 2019 Page 5 of6
• It would be difficult to make findings that the project has an integrated design and complements the existing center.
• The applicant may be able to use terracottain a contemporary way.
Inresponse to DRC's comments regarding building form and materials, the applicant has revised the proposed angled roof design to a stepped flat roof design, eliminated the spandrel glass, and increased the wall area covered with fiber cement panels. No other changes to architecture, or implementation of similar materials and colors are proposed. Although Staff has encouraged the incorporation of additional features that would help tie the ALDI exterior design to that of the existing shopping center, including the use of coordinated materials and colors, it is the applicant's objective to maintain the ALDI brand design and introduce new materials to the shopping center that will allow for a larger palette when future renovations in the center are proposed.
In light of the DRC's comments regarding the proposed design and its relationship with the existing shopping center context, staff is seeking a final determination from the DRC as to whether the applicant's design changes go far enough to achieve an updated facade and ALDI branding while achieving a condition that remains compatible with the shopping center and surrounding properties. Should the DRC approve the project, findings and recommended conditions of approval are included as Attachment 4 to this report. The DRC may provide additional conditions or modifications to conditions to support the required findings and ensure the preservation of community aesthetics.
Issue 2: Tustin Street Design Standards
The 1986 Tustin Street Design Standards were created in response to the City's goal of redevelopment and reinvestment into the Tustin Street Project Area, or Limited Business Tustin Redevelopment Project Area (C-TR) zoning district. Although the Redevelopment Agency no longer exists, the Tustin Street Design Standards are still applicable to all changes proposed to existing buildings and to all new construction within the Tustin Street Project Area. The proposed project is located within Thematic District #3 of the Tustin Street Design Standards. The theme and architectural design features for this district largely focus on the "Mall of Orange", now called the Village at Orange shopping mall. The document indicates that "with the proposed rehabilitation of the Mall, it is anticipated that the standard it establishes can be applied to adjacent buildings". The document also indicates that "beneficial remodeling occurs when the original massing, rhythm, texture and color of a building are retained or enhanced by an addition or a change in facade".
The Village at Orange shopping mall received a partial remodel in 2017; however, the remodel excluded the buildings closest to the project site, including Sears, and the freestandingpad building containing Trader Joes, and CVS Pharmacy. The ALDI exterior remodel implements modern design features and materials that complement the recently remodeled Village at Orange shopping mall; however, the project is located across Meats Avenue, approximately .20 miles (1,067 linear feet) south of the remodeled area. Design Review Committee Staff Report May 15, 2019 Page 6 o/6
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION Interdepartmental StreamlinedMultidisciplinary Accelerated Review Team (SMART) review was not required for this project proposal.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map 2. March 20, 2019 Final Design Review Committee Meeting Minutes 3. Applicant's Response to DRC Comments regarding the March 20, 2019 Design Review Committee Meeting 4. Required Findings and Conditions of Approval should the DRC approve the project 5. Project Plans (date stamped received April 24, 2019), including previous elevation plans from March 20, 2019 DRC meeting (Sheet CEE-1 ), and Site Photos
cc: GreenbergFarrow Attn: Lori Gafner 30 Executive Park Irvine, CA 92614 [email protected]
ALDI Attn: Matthew Baca 12661 ALDI Place Moreno Valley, CA 92555 matthew. [email protected]
Orange Villa Shopping Center LLC Attn: Jones Development Group 3636 Birch Street, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 [email protected]
N:\CDD\PLNG\Applications\Design Review No. 4962-18 ALDI\DRC\StaffReport 5.15.19 Vicinity Map 2050 N. Tustin Street Design Review (DRC No. 4962-18)
CITY OF ORANGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ATTACHMENT NO. 1 DRC 4962-18; ALDI VICINITY MAP May 15, 2019 DRC MTG. City of Orange - DesignReview Committee Final Minutes for Meeting on March 20, 2019 Page 6 of 6
New Agenda Items
DRC No. 4962-18 - ALDI • A proposal to convert an existing Staples retail store to an ALDI grocery store and two vacant tenant spaces, with minor site improvements. • 2050 N. Tustin Street • StaffContact: Monique Schwartz, 714-744- 7224, [email protected] • DRC Action: Preliminary Review.
Monique Schwartz, Associate Planner, provided an overview of the proposal consistent with the staff report.
Chair McDermott opened the public commentportion of the meeting; there were no speakers.
Branko Prebanda, the project architect, provided a presentation of design intentions. The Committee had questions and comments on the following: • The project is successful in emulating the mall; however the design does not work in the existing shopping center context. • The innovative architecture clashes with the design of the existing shopping center. • The Committee would like to see an internally consistent integrated design theme. The applicant could maintain similar forms and change the materials, or maintain similar materials and change the form and still have a link to the existing design of the shopping center. The submittal plans show that both form and material are changing. It would be more acceptable if the building had a stepped roof instead of a shed roof to make an argument that the forms are tied. • The percentage of graphics on the window area needs to fall within the sign standards. • It would be difficult to make findings that the project has an integrated design and complements the existing center. • The applicant may be able to use terra-cotta in a contemporary way. • Mr. Branko stated that ALDI has an established brand and theme.
Chairman McDermott stated this is a preliminary review so no vote is needed.
Committee Member Skorpanich informed staff she will not be available for the April 17, 2019 meeting.
ADJOURNMENT:
Chair McDennott adjourned the meeting at 8:33 p.m.
The next regular meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 3, 2019.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2 DRC 4962-18; ALDI FINAL 03/20/19 DRC MTG MINUTES May 15, 2019 DRC MTG. - '
PLANNING DIVISION RECEIVED APR 2 't 2019 30 Executive Park Suite 100 CITY OF ORANGE Irvine, CA 92614 I Greenbergfarrow 949.296.0450 -w.greenbergfarrow.com ewe Are Global
April 24, 2019
To Monique Schwartz Project ALDI on Tustin, DRC# 4962-18 City of Orange Project# 20181417 300 E. Chapman Ave. Orange, CA 92866 Re Response to DRC Preliminaryreview meeting minutes dated 4/20/19
Dear Monique: In response to the Committee's comments as outlined in the meeting minutes, we offer the following:
a. The project is successful in emulating the mall; however, the design does not work in the existing shopping center context. i. The Village at Orange was built with a limited color pallet of earth tones (beige, brown, terra cotta) and a straight forward fQrm with a base, a strong horizontal band at the arcade, and both flat and arched entryparapets. The terra cotta arcade roof is interrupted by different building forms (the two story building, the large tenant buildings of BevMo, Staples, and Turners). The center also anchors the corner along Meats Ave. by interrupting the arcade with a taller vertical anchor. Various buildings within the center use color in the form of paint and awnings to differentiate with yellow and darker brown paint and bright blue, green and red awnings used. ii. ALDI Color pallet: The Aldi uses an earth tone color pallet with a walnut block base, and ·bark" (brown) wood panels.
tsua As do the other larger tenants, the Aldi store is slightly taller and interrupts the adjacent arcade. Aside from the entry doors and a small segment where the wood panels drop to grade, Tuffb/ock is used to create a base. The flat covered entry roof continues the strong horizontal band of the adjacent arcade. The store is pulled slightly forward of the adjacent tenants creating its own 'comet' facing Meats Ave; the taller entry segment anchors that corner. The roof line is flat in keeping with the majority of the center.
Differentiate: While Aldi does not utilize fabric awnings, its aluminum composite panels are its distinctive feature. The vertical graphic of red and green are in the same color family as the existing awnings. The aluminum panels and color increase the store's visibility within the Center.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DRC 4962-18; ALDI APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO DRC COMMENTS FROM 03/20/19 DRC MTG May 15, 2019 DRC MTG. .. - ..
b. Placement of the columns and doors. i. We are making the assumption that this comment refers to the columns and doors of the two new tenant spaces. The intent is to match the rhythm and materials of the other smaller tenants along the arcade.
c. The innovative architecture clashes with the design of the existing shopping center. i. The style of the proposed ALDI is in line with current retail architecture that is becoming more common in the Tustin Street Thematic District while the Village at Orange center was built in 7 965, renovated in 7 999 and its architectural style reflects the style chosen at that time. As the large tenants turn over in the center, the options are to either continue in the same initial architectural style or to integrate newer styles to keep the center vibrant and inviting. The style proposed does utilize the color pallet and form of the center while expanding its material selection. d. The Committee would like to see an internally consistent integrated design theme. The applicant could maintain similar forms and change the materials or maintain similar materials and change the form and still have a link to the existing design of the shopping center. The submittal plans show that both form and material are changing. It would be more acceptable if the building had a stepped roof instead of a shed roof to make an argument that the forms are tied. i. The elevation has been redesigned to better follow the form of the center. The angled roof line has been changed to a stepped flat roof line in keeping with the BevMo and Turner's stepped entry parapets. e. The percentage of graphics on the window area needs to fall within the sign standards. i. The signage, which includes the vertical graphic and the main ·'ALDI'sign, will be reviewed independent of the building review. It remains on the elevations for clarity, but ALDI is aware that it does not meet the current standards and is working with the Owner and City on adjustments. f. It would be difficult to make findings that the project has an integrated design and complements the existing center. i. As described in A, the project does integrate the color pallet, the form. and pattern of differentiation in the Center. g. The applicant may be able to use terra-cotta in a contemporary way. i. Aldi has decided not to incorporate terra cotta. h. Mr. Branko stated that ALDI has an established brand and theme.
Sincerely,
April 12, 2019 I Page2 #Gf Attachment 4 (DRC 4962-18-ALDI)
REQUIRED FINDINGS:
The courts define a "Finding" as a conclusion which describes the method of analysis decision makers utilize to make the final decision. A decision making body "makes a Finding," or draws a conclusion, through identifying evidence in the record (i.e., testimony, reports, environmental documents, etc.) and should not contain unsupported statements. The statements which support the Findings bridge the gap between the raw data and the ultimate decision, thereby showing the rational decision making process that took place. The "Findings" are, in essence, the ultimate conclusions which must be reached in order to approve ( or recommend approval of) a project. The same holds true if denying a project. The decision making body must detail why it cannot make the Findings.
The Findings are applied as appropriate to each project. Based on the following Findings and statements in support of such Findings, staff recommends the DRC approve the project with recommended conditions.
1. In the Old Towne Historic District, the proposed work conforms to the prescriptive standards and design criteria referenced and/or recommended by the DRC or other reviewing body for the project (OMC 17.10.070.G.J).
The proposed project is not within the Old Towne Historic District. As such, this finding is not applicable.
2. In any National Register Historic District, the proposed work complies with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines (OMC 17. 10. 070. G. 2).
The proposed project is not within any National Register Historic District. As such, this finding is not applicable.
3. The project design upholds community aesthetics through the use of an internally consistent, integrated design theme and is consistent with all adopted specific plans, applicable design standards, and their required findings (OMC 17.10.070.G.3).
The project is not located within a specific plan, however it is located within Thematic District #3 of the Tustin Street Design Standards. The theme and architectural design features for this district focus on the "Mall of Orange", now called the Village at Orange shopping mall. The Village at Orange shopping mall received a partial remodel in 2017, whereby modem design, materials and colors were implemented to provide an updated contemporary aesthetic to the Tustin Street retail commercial corridor. The architecture of the surrounding development along Tustin Street is contemporary and eclectic with no particular unified aesthetic character or theme.
ATTACHMENT NO. 4 DRC 4962-18; ALDI REQUIRED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Mav 15. 2019 DRC MTG. 5. Construction permits shall be obtained for all future construction work, as required by the City of Orange, Community Development Department's Building Division. Failure to obtain the required building permits will be cause for revocation of this permit.
6. If not utilized, project approval expires twenty-four months from the approval date. Extensions of time may be granted in accordance with OMC Section 17.08.060. The Planning entitlements expire unless Building Permits are pulled within 2 years of the original approval.
7. In conjunction with construction, all activity will be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction activity will be permitted on Sundays and Federal holidays.
8. These conditions shall be reprinted on the second page of the construction documents when submitted to the Building Division for the plan check process.
9. Any graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours from the time the City of Orange Notice of Violation is received by the applicant/property owner.
10. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director that new mechanical equipment screening shall be installed that architecturally matches the building.
N:\CDD\PLNG\Applications\Design Review No. 4962-18 ALDI\DRC\Attachment 4 to DRC Staff Report 5.15.19 v· f< TRAFCIC SIGMI. I Greenbergfarrow 30 Executive Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 t: 949 296 0450 f: 949 296 04 79 PROJECT INFORMATION ZONING INFORMATION JURISDICTION: CITY OF ORANGE, CA EXISTING ZONING C-TR (LIMITED BUSINESS, TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA) _ ___-,-- PROPOSED ZONING· C- TR (LIMITED BUSINESS, TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA)
DENTISTRY BUILDING SETBACKS 1,700 SF FRONT· 10· SIDE: o· REAR· o·
2,040 SF SITE AREA ALOJ NET SITE AREA ± 1.865 AC REMAINING SHOPPING CENTER SITE AREA ± 4.322 AC TOT Al SITE AREA ±6187AC ALICIA'S CARDS H & GIFTS BUILDING AREA 1,360 SF ALDI: ± 20,715 SF REMAINING SHOPPING CENTER ± 63,955 SF FRENCH'S BAKERY TOTAL BUILDING AREA: ± 84,670 SF 2,040 SF .. ALOI SITE COVERAGE· ±25.50% (±11.107 SF/AC) - HAIR & NAILS TOT AL SITE COVERAGE: ±31.42% (t13,685 AF/AC) --- 1,020 SF (l) ±140' ... PARKING SUMMARY RATIO SPACES SPACES USER REQUIRED REQ'O PROVO ,, <( I Ill � Ill ALDI 5 SP/1000 SF ------:ro;i � - REMAINING SHOPPING CENTER 269 - TOTAL: 373 < 1111: I ... ALDI RATIO PROVIDED: ±5 02 SP/1000 SF I en TOTAL SHOPPING CENTER RATIO PROVIDED ±4 41 SP/1000 SF z I ±20,715 SF - I ... PLANNING DIVISION I en RECEIVED FUTURE TENANT :I APR 2 4 2019 I ±3,372 SF ... CITY OF ORANGE
TURNER'S OUTDOORSMAN I 7,652 SF PROJECT NOTES I 1. THIS SITE PLAN IS BASED ON A PDF OF THE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MAP, A PDF OF CFP-5, AND AN AERIAL.
DRAWING ISSUE/REVISION RECORD DATE NARRATIVE INITIALS 0812312018 PREP SP-1 CD ZITO'S PIZZA 0911112018 PREP SP-11 CD 6,616SF 09/1912018 PREP SP-12 CD \ 11/1312018 REV SP-1.2 CD 01/2312019 REV SP-12 CD I 02/14/2019 PREP SP-2 CD I 0212712019 PREP SP-2 1 CD
CLIENT ALDI CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE MATIHEWBACA \ SITE PLANNER CD SITE DEV. COORDINATOR LORIGAFNER I BEVMOI BEVMO! I (2ND FLOOR 14,475 SF OFFICES ATIACHMENT NO. 5 ORANGE,CA 4, 143 SF) DRC 4962-18; ALDI 2050 N. TUSTIN STREET \ PROJECT PLANS (DATE STAMPED 04/24/19) I May 15, 2019 DRC MTG. GFA PROJECT NUMBER 20181417.0 I SCALE: 1 .. = 30° ES I I I I 15 30 60 90 120 \ - - ��- - - ��- - - ��- - - ��- - - ��- - - ��- - - ��- - - ��� SP 2.1 VIOi< ""'0"0 '° "]' � ::••··""' c• ocr,.-,c,.,__ WJ.es,oo·,c., >c:e>SIICQl'�! Issued: W:Jt""•'" ,,,,1 Dote: "'";;,,�·,i "' S'1°ll>II IJLt "f�S �EAR DOC( OPeRAIIO,..:S DATA I ¥7 O ER PIIOJO!YP( 07 27 18 828·10' J...::.i " I A5SUMrn PALLEI STORAGE sa +- 8Ull.01NG DIMENSIONS 11',...a·, 1�.4· SALES FLOOR D'\.\ENSfONS 74-6", 153-• LENClll OF MLllllDEC� tzo COOLEi! M1': DOORS I COOl(R Gl:NERAl DOORS FREEZER GENERAL DOO�S " -I SPOT /.IE'1CHANDISERS ,"0 CA�I STORAGE jl44)M00Et563W '180 ) MODEL •90W G = ORANGE. CA OIM. = \17 0 E� PROTO 07 27 18 Dl'vl � 1 THIS DRAWING IS FOl< G!'NEIIAL FIXiLIRINC LAYOUJ AND REF ERE NC€ IQ EOU PMEN. O'ILY. ALL 1NfOl<1'tAIIONLSFOR ALD OPERAT!ONAlUSEONLV AND $HAI l NOT BE USED FOR CONSl.�UCI 0.'I OR BIDDING PURPOSES All O!M�NSIONS IQ WAUS ARE TO FACE Of STUD ALL DIMENSK)NS FO� S,IELVING ARE ro FACE OF GONOOlA !HIS FACltilT DOES NO! CONJAIN A 6A<(RY A Blf!CH:R A DEU 0� FISH COUNTER S All FOOD IS PREPA.Cl(AGED ROA.IL DISIGN COLLA•ORATIYI lt>O�E IS NO OSI SIIE fOQD PREPA.RA1ION GONCOLA LOCAlfONS ,\RE MEA.SIJRED fROM IHE �ACE OF IHE SIAl"LES.S STEEL PR'CE tAC MO-DING 15.SPIMI 245 East 3rd Street Long Beach, CA 90802 t 562.628.8000 rdcollaboratlw.com &QJIDD Inc. 12661 A!d1 Place Morena Volley CA 92555 6703 rl,)'Wi1%!f., ALDI Inc. Store #: Orange 2050 N. Tushn St. Orange, CA Orange County AUlO EN1RY1 u Issued: Date: A B c D Revisions: Dote: 2 3 D 4 5 PART OF EXISTING MAIN EAST ELEVATION \CfllE 1116"•0" Seal Seal PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DATE ALUMINUM ALUMINUM COMPOSITE STOREFRONT PROJECT LEAD DATE PANELS "BRIGHT SYSTEM SILVER" EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN PAINTED PLASTER PROJECT DESIGNER DATE TO MATCH EXISTING PAINTED PLASTER ALUMINUM TO MATCH EXISTING STOREFRONT SYSTEM TO MATCH EXISTING PAINTED PLASTER TO MATCH EXISTING PART OF EXISTING RftAJL DISIGN COLLABORATift BUILDING CD����QSJ. ��,iT_JEt;_!L,,!E;.JvuAuT.l.\l. 02]N'i.1J{E;j_A�s:jjTu) �r�--:�. . �---,1,.. RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION NORTH ���������������- SCALE:118",.1' O" 245 East 3rd Street Long Beach, CA 90802 t562.628.BOOO rdcollaboratlw.com &Oc,@D Inc. 12661 Aldi Ploce Mom110 Volley, CA 92555·6703 11l11t1�tfa, ALDI Inc. Store#: EXISTING STAPLES (EAST ELEVATION) Orange SCALE SIMILAR TO MAIN [AST (L(VATION 10 2050 N. Tustin St. SC"ll0Sl0!lli01 NJWAJAffii8£'tMiWI.ION Orange, CA Orange County Project Name & Location: CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS Drawing Name: Project No. Date: 04.10 19 18-172 Type: REMODEL Drawn By: RT EXISTING ELEVATION FACING SOUTH CEE-1 �CALE SIMILAR TO MAIN EAST HEVATION Scale: As Noted Drawin No. Issued: Date: Prior plans from March 20. 2019 DRC meeting A B c D Revisions: Date: I 2 3 4 5 MAIN EAST ELEVATION �CALL 111b -n o 4' a · rn Seal Seal .------�------� •------1AgLUilMi'ii"' 51"rr1Mr----·ALUMINl.:JMl----:-::::i PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DAIE MEMBRANE�------. COMPOS IT COMPOSITE MEMBRANE NICH1HA FIBER ROOFING ALUMINUM SPAN OREL PAINTED PLASTER CEMENT PANELS "GRAY' PANELS "BRIGHT PANELS "BRIGHT ROc!>FING '"====------�D"A�TE-, COMPOSITE GLASS ALUMINUM SILVER" SILVER" "GRJ\Y' PROJECT LEAD TO MATCH EXISTING PANELS "BRIGHT VINTAGE WOOD 8' X 9.5' COMPOSITE "BARK" SIGN srANoREL EXISTING ROOF SILVER" PANELS "BRIGHT SILVER" TO REMAIN GLASS 1-,�R�O�JE�C�T D�E�SG, �N�E�,------,Dc,A,aTE-t PAINTED PLASTER ALUMINUM TO MATCH EXISTING STOREFRONT SYSTEM TO MATCH EXISTING PAINTED PLASTER TO MATCH EXISTING PART OF EXISTING Rll'l'AIL D•SIQN COLLABORATIYI: BUILDING RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION NORTH SCALE 1/8'n1'0" 245 East 3rd Street Long Beach, CA 90802 t 562.628.8000 rdcollaboratlw.com &[1JIDD Inc. ALDI Inc. Store#: EXISTING STAPLES (EAST ELEVATION) Orange �CALE "JMILAR 10 MAIN EAST ELEVATION TO 2050 N. Tustin St. �Cllfl0$l� Nl'flilil:W,lt(!J:f.'(l\lJIWIJON Orange. CA Orange County Project Name & Location: CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS Drawing Name: Project No. Date: oace 19 18-172 Type: REMODEL Drawn By: RT CEE-1 EXISTING ELEVATION FACING SOUTH SCALE SIMILAR 10 MAIN EA�T ELEVATION Scale: As Noted Drawin No. v Issued: Date: A B c 0 Revisions: Date: 2 3 4 5 z 3 4 Seal Seal PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DATE PROJECT LEAD DATE PROJECT DESIGNER DA TE 5 6 7 8 9 AIITAIL DISICIN COLLABOIIATlft 10 11 12 13 245 East 3rd Street Long Beach, CA 90802 t 562.628.8000 rdcollaboratiw,.com 14 15 16 ·- &ll@D Inc. 12661 A'di Place Morerio Volley. CA 92555 6703 r,IW&r-4W"' ALDI Inc. Store#: Orange 17 18 2050 N. Tustin St. Orange, CA fl) Orange County t,) Project Name & Location: � ' CONTEXTUAL SITE �� J350 PHOTOS Project No. Date: 02 21 19 18-172 19 20 Type: REMODEL ----- EXISTING SITE PHOTOS Drawn By: RT CEE-1.1 KEY SITE PLAN Scale: As Noted Drawin No. Issued: Date: A B x c 0 Revisions: Date: 2 3 4 s MAIN EAST ELEVATION SCAL[ 1/lb",O" O··-� < 8 16 Seal Seal PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DATE PRO.JECT LEAD DATE PROJECT DESIGNER DATE MEMBRANE ROOFING VERTICAL GRAY" MESSAGE TOWER MEMBRANE ROOFING '"GRAY RffAIL DHIGN COLLABORATl'ff. 245 East 3rd Street Long Beach, CA 90802 t 562.628.8000 rdcollaborative.com "-cLta>s...co..,1,,,,."r" .... VfHeOf '"'"' IOTe ,.....,, I SO.IC>"""'Jll"D '-.._ 'l"'IOPII l � +----'------ALUMC\Jli!;INW'llS"'>lEV ,,�.R,c,, cw"'""°,�1w , '"'-'' VMT LED BOX SEE IMAGE- B C;" ,oLL \ 1 Traveling East on Meats Ave • • ..t:,,-. .. 2 Traveling West on Meats Ave r • Q Property North of Shopping Center HomeGoods 1500 E Village Way .. 0 R Properties North of Shopping Center Active and Red Robin 2199 N Orange Mall s Property North of Shopping Center Wal mart 2300 N Tustin St • - e,t-:-"' u Property North of Shopping Center Panera Bread 2214 N Tustin St , • ....�...... v Property North East of Shopping Center Dentistry 2393 N Tustin St. Ste A w Property South East of Shopping Center Home Depot 1855 N Tustin Ave x Property South of Shopping Center Toyota 1400 N Tustin St y Traveling North on Tustin St z Traveling South on Tustin St