DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Pleasant Hill Housing Element Adopted | April 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Pleasant Hill Housing Element Adopted | April 2015 City of Pleasant Hill Housing Element CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED April 2015 City of Pleasant Hill Housing Element Adopted | April 2015 CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Public Participation ................................................................................................................................... 2 Evaluation of Previous Housing Element ............................................................................................. 2 Population, Housing and Employment Trends for Pleasant Hill .................................................... 29 Population ............................................................................................................................................ 29 Source: U.S. Census ............................................................................................................................. 30 Ethnic Populations .............................................................................................................................. 30 Households ........................................................................................................................................... 30 Employment ......................................................................................................................................... 31 Housing Needs .................................................................................................................................... 32 Age Distribution .................................................................................................................................. 33 Elderly ................................................................................................................................................... 33 Persons with Disabilities .................................................................................................................... 35 Large Families and Overcrowding ................................................................................................... 37 Single-Parent Households .................................................................................................................. 38 Persons in Need of Emergency Shelter ............................................................................................. 39 Farm workers ....................................................................................................................................... 40 Income and Overpayment .................................................................................................................. 40 Housing Affordability ......................................................................................................................... 41 Extremely-Low-Income Households ................................................................................................ 43 Housing Supply ................................................................................................................................... 44 Housing Conditions and Rehabilitation Needs .............................................................................. 44 At-Risk Units ........................................................................................................................................ 45 Availability of Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 46 Housing Development Potential ....................................................................................................... 47 Constraints on Housing Production ..................................................................................................... 50 Governmental Constraints ................................................................................................................. 50 History of Measure B Provisions ....................................................................................................... 50 Measure J .............................................................................................................................................. 51 Inclusionary Housing .......................................................................................................................... 51 Secondary Units ................................................................................................................................... 52 Single Room Occupancy (SRO) ......................................................................................................... 53 Emergency Shelters and Transitional/Supportive Housing ......................................................... 53 Development review procedures, fees, and standards .................................................................. 54 Mixed Use ............................................................................................................................................. 55 Trends in Mixed Use Development .................................................................................................. 55 Housing for Persons with Disabilities .............................................................................................. 56 Development Fees ............................................................................................................................... 57 Non-governmental Constraints ......................................................................................................... 59 Consistency with Other General Plan Elements ............................................................................. 60 Opportunities for Energy Conservation ........................................................................................... 60 Successor Housing Agency ................................................................................................................ 62 Goals, Policies, and Programs ............................................................................................................... 64 Appendix A: Residential Development Standards Summary .......................................................... 81 Appendix B: City Residential Parking Requirements ........................................................................ 83 Appendix C: Pleasant Hill Properties which are Vacant or Below Allowable Densities ............. 84 Appendix D: Analysis of Potential Affordable Housing Sites ......................................................... 89 City of Pleasant Hill Housing Element Adopted | April 2015 Appendix E: Typical Development Review Process ........................................................................ 119 Appendix F: Glossary ........................................................................................................................... 123 Appendix G: Public Notice List .......................................................................................................... 127 TABLES Table H1. Evaluation of the Previous Housing Element ...................................................................... 3 Table H2. Population Estimates and Projections, 2010-2040 .............................................................. 29 Table H3. City Household and Group Quarters Population ............................................................. 30 Table H4. Ethnic Composition ............................................................................................................... 30 Table H5. Household Projections, 2010-2040 ....................................................................................... 31 Table H6. Household Size and Ownership, 2010 ................................................................................ 31 Table H7. Jobs/Housing Balance, 2010-2040........................................................................................ 32 Table H8. City Share of Regional Housing Need, 2014-2022 ............................................................. 33 Table H9. Age Distribution by Percentage, 2000-2010 ........................................................................ 33 Table H10. Householder Age by Tenure, 2010 .................................................................................... 34 Table H11. Senior and Group Care Facilities, 2014 ............................................................................. 35 Table H12. Disabilities by Age Group................................................................................................... 36 Table H13a. Household Size by Tenure ................................................................................................ 37 Table H13b. Overcrowding .................................................................................................................... 38 Table H14. Household Type and Presence of Children, 2010 ........................................................... 38 Table H15. Overpayment ........................................................................................................................ 41 Table H16. Affordable Housing Cost by Income Category ............................................................... 42 Table H17. Median Home Prices 2013 .................................................................................................. 42 Table H18. Apartment Rents
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 155, SUBDIVISION of LAND
    Chapter 155, SUBDIVISION OF LAND [HISTORY: Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Warren County 2-24-1981. Amendments noted where applicable.] GENERAL REFERENCES Planning Commission -- See Ch. 36. Building construction -- See Ch. 76. Road names and signs -- See Ch. 142, Art. I. Zoning -- See Ch. 180. ARTICLE I, General Provisions § 155-1. Purpose. A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish certain subdivision standards and procedures for all the unincorporated areas of Warren County, Virginia, as provided for by the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. B. These articles are part of a long-range plan to guide and facilitate the orderly, beneficial growth of the community and to promote the public health, safety, convenience, comfort, prosperity and general welfare. More specifically, but not in limitation, the purpose of these standards is to provide for: (1) The change that occurs when lands and acreage become developed for residential, commercial and industrial purposes. (2) Protection for the purchasers of lots to assure that they are buying a commodity that is suitable for building and use. (3) The avoidance of placing an unreasonable burden on the county to provide educational services, water and sewer services, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal and other public services or the necessity of an excessive expenditure of public funds for the supply of such services. (4) The coordination and beneficial design and maintenance of both public and private streets. (5) Control of subdivisions or building sites in floodplain areas of streams and drainage courses and in unsafe land areas. (6) A distribution of population and traffic which will tend to create conditions favorable to health, safety, convenience, comfort, prosperity and general welfare.
    [Show full text]
  • Formerly Single Room Occupancy
    ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Marcia L. White Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 1· 1CJ. · 1-D Date sent to Council: 1. 2,, l£:l . 10 TO: Salt Lake City Council Chris Wharton, Chair SUBJECT: Revised Transmittal re: Petition PLNPCM2018-00066 - Shared Housing Zoning ------+e-x-t-A-11:i:fillEi-n.1ents--E-feHRe1:.iy-t-i-t-leEl---&i-ng-le--R00rn-Geeu13ane-y- E-8-RGj-'I=e*t'-Amendments-J1-------------'- STAFF CONTACT: Ashley Ogden, RDA Project Manager (formerly Principal Planner) (80 I) 535-7207, [email protected] DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached ordinance, which has been revised in response to feedback received during the City Council public hearing held on April 23, 2019, a meeting with local housing advocates held on Octa ber 22, 2019, and direction received from the Council during the November 19, 2019, work session. BUDGET IMP ACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This is a follow up briefing memo to the existing transmittal package for this proposal and includes the following updated infonnation: On March 19, 2019, Planning Division Staff briefed the City Council on a Mayor-initiated proposal to amend sections of the Zoning Ordinance to better define Single Room Occupancy (SRO) housing and determine appropriate locations within the City for the use. Proposed amendments included changing the existing definition of SRO Dwelling, expanding the number of zoning districts that pennit SR Os, and creating qualifying provisions for the use. The Council held a public hearing on April 23, 2019, where numerous residents with differing views provided comment: some expressed concerns with the potential negative impacts of SRO SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.S LC .GOV P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Subdivision Planning and Design: Analysis, Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography
    Sustainable Subdivision Planning and Design: Analysis, Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography Issues in Urban Sustainability No. 7 __________________ by David R. Van Vliet 1994 __________________ The Institute of Urban Studies FOR INFORMATION: The Institute of Urban Studies The University of Winnipeg 599 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg phone: 204.982.1140 fax: 204.943.4695 general email: [email protected] Mailing Address: The Institute of Urban Studies The University of Winnipeg 515 Portage Avenue Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3B 2E9 SUSTAINABLE SUBDIVISION PLANNING AND DESIGN: ANALYSIS, LITERATURE REVIEW AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Issues in Urban Sustainability No. 7 Published 1994 by the Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnipeg © THE INSTITUTE OF URBAN STUDIES Note: The cover page and this information page are new replacements, 2015. The Institute of Urban Studies is an independent research arm of the University of Winnipeg. Since 1969, the IUS has been both an academic and an applied research centre, committed to examining urban development issues in a broad, non-partisan manner. The Institute examines inner city, environmental, Aboriginal and community development issues. In addition to its ongoing involvement in research, IUS brings in visiting scholars, hosts workshops, seminars and conferences, and acts in partnership with other organizations in the community to effect positive change. SUSTAINABLE SUBDIVISION PLANNING AND DESIGN: Analysis, Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography Issues in Urban Sustainability 7 David R. Van Vliet Institute of Urban Studies 1994 ii PUBLICATION DATA Van Vliet, David R. Sustainable Subdivision Planning and Design: Analysis, Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography (Issues in Urban Sustainability; 7) ISBN: 0-896023-00-2 I. The University of Winnipeg.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanistica N. 146 April-June 2011
    Urbanistica n. 146 April-June 2011 Distribution by www.planum.net Index and english translation of the articles Paolo Avarello The plan is dead, long live the plan edited by Gianfranco Gorelli Urban regeneration: fundamental strategy of the new structural Plan of Prato Paolo Maria Vannucchi The ‘factory town’: a problematic reality Michela Brachi, Pamela Bracciotti, Massimo Fabbri The project (pre)view Riccardo Pecorario The path from structure Plan to urban design edited by Carla Ferrari A structural plan for a ‘City of the wine’: the Ps of the Municipality of Bomporto Projects and implementation Raffaella Radoccia Co-planning Pto in the Val Pescara Mariangela Virno Temporal policies in the Abruzzo Region Stefano Stabilini, Roberto Zedda Chronographic analysis of the Urban systems. The case of Pescara edited by Simone Ombuen The geographical digital information in the planning ‘knowledge frameworks’ Simone Ombuen The european implementation of the Inspire directive and the Plan4all project Flavio Camerata, Simone Ombuen, Interoperability and spatial planners: a proposal for a land use Franco Vico ‘data model’ Flavio Camerata, Simone Ombuen What is a land use data model? Giuseppe De Marco Interoperability and metadata catalogues Stefano Magaudda Relationships among regional planning laws, ‘knowledge fra- meworks’ and Territorial information systems in Italy Gaia Caramellino Towards a national Plan. Shaping cuban planning during the fifties Profiles and practices Rosario Pavia Waterfrontstory Carlos Smaniotto Costa, Monica Bocci Brasilia, the city of the future is 50 years old. The urban design and the challenges of the Brazilian national capital Michele Talia To research of one impossible balance Antonella Radicchi On the sonic image of the city Marco Barbieri Urban grapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Club Rio Rancho Golf Course Charrette Report
    CLUB RIO RANCHO GOLF COURSE CHARRETTE REPORT July, 2017 Prepared For: Prepared by: The City of Rio Rancho Consensus Planning, Inc. 3200 Civic Center Cir NE, 302 Eighth Street NW Rio Rancho, NM 87144 Albuquerque, NM 87102 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Scope and Purpose 3 Background 5 • Introduction 5 • Case Studies 6 • Site History 8 Methods 9 • Overview 9 • Introductory Meeting - April 21 9 • Charrette – May 5 10 • Charrette Results 11 • Charrette Follow Up – June 9 17 Next Steps 19 • Property Owner 19 • Stakeholders 19 • City of Rio Rancho 19 • Critical Elements of the Master Plan 20 • Final Notes 20 Appendix A: Meeting Sign-In 21 Sheets Appendix B: Meeting Notes 25 Page 1 Page 2 Scope and Purpose Once a hallmark of the City of Rio Rancho, Club Rio Rancho struggled financially in the 2000’s before finally closing in 2016. Degrading conditions and concern from local stakeholders caused the City to take an active roll facilitating a conversation and charrette in the Spring of 2017. Consensus Planning was hired to facilitate this dialogue among stakeholders in order to develop potential solutions for the site. Club Rio Rancho shut down its North 9 in land use alternatives. Following this 2013, eventually closing its doors entirely charrette, Consensus Planning was to in December of 2016. Since that time the explore these potential alternatives, future of the course’s roughly 260 acres combining them into land use plans, has been a topic of heated debate for and providing analysis regarding how the property’s owners, local residents, these alternatives might progress into city staff, and potential developers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Architectural Design of Shopping Malls on Consumer Behaviours: Bilgehan Yılmaz Çakmak* a Case of Konya Cihangir Yılmaz**
    ICONARP International Journal of Architecture & Planning Received 22 October 2017; Accepted 12 April 2018 Volume 6, Issue 1, pp: 142-157/Published 25 June 2018 Research Article DOI: 10.15320/ICONARP.2018.42–E-ISSN: 2147-9380 ICONARP The Impact of Architectural Design of Shopping Malls on Consumer Behaviours: Bilgehan Yılmaz Çakmak* A Case of Konya Cihangir Yılmaz** Abstract Subject of consumer behaviours has been critical importance for Keywords: Shopping malls, architectural business platform and related disciplines from past to present. Being design, consumer preferences, consumer behaviors. able to understand consumer behaviour and identify strategies in this direction have become the most important condition for survival in *Asst Prof. Dr. Faculty of Architecture, Konya competitive conditions. Many researchers produce new studies in order Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] to understand and direct consumer behaviours more accurately. In time, Orcid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4199- researchers have elaborated these studies and have begun to link 0648 various disciplines such as law, economics, geography, architecture with ** MA, Social Sciences Institute consumer behaviour. In this study, it is aimed to determine the Business Education, Production Management relationship between consumption concept and architectural discipline. and Marketing Science E-mail: [email protected] Design criteria that increase and decrease consumption preference and Orcid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228- quantity have been investigated by determining the extent to which the 3864 interior and exterior architecture affected the consumption habits. Method: In this study, based on the literature, a conceptual survey of the daily shopping malls has been conducted from past to present.
    [Show full text]
  • Single-Room Occupancy Uses
    City Council Report City Council Meeting: March 26, 2019 Agenda Item: 7.A To: Mayor and City Council From: David Martin, Director, City Planning Subject: Introduction and Adoption of an Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance Regarding Single-Room Occupancy Uses Recommended Action Staff recommends Council introduce and adopt an urgency interim zoning ordinance to prohibit Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) uses citywide on an interim basis in order to prevent the proliferation and over-concentration of SRO uses that are not 100% Affordable Housing Projects or certain specialized housing uses such as emergency shelters, transitional housing, and supportive housing. This urgency interim zoning ordinance would allow for study of revised development standards, land use regulations, use classifications, and additional requirements related to physical design or amenity plans, for SRO uses in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Executive Summary Over the years, City staff, decisionmakers, and community members have had numerous discussions regarding housing development in the City and how to create effective housing policies, programs, and regulatory tools to address the need for more development of a variety of types and sizes of housing options. In particular, a need has been identified for development of new affordable housing and supportive housing, and market-rate multi-family projects near transit, in order to offer attractive and feasible opportunities for a range of individuals and families to live in Santa Monica. The Downtown Community Plan was adopted by Council on July 25, 2017. Framed as a “housing first” approach, it envisioned a robust mix of housing types serving a wide range of household sizes and income levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Your Planned Community Need Subdivision Approval? By: George Asimos As Originally Published As a Special to the Legal Intelligencer, PLW, April 20, 2009 ______
    Does Your Planned Community Need Subdivision Approval? By: George Asimos As originally published as a Special to the Legal Intelligencer, PLW, April 20, 2009 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ GEORGE ASIMOS, an attorney and partner with Saul Ewing, has practiced transactional real estate and land use law exclusively for more than 20 years. He represents developers, telecommunications companies, industrial operators and other land owners in acquiring and obtaining project approvals from municipal boards and commissions in matters relating to zoning, subdivision and land development. Asimos works out of the offices in Chesterbrook, Pa., and Harrisburg, Pa., and can be reached at [email protected]. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ With the case of Frank N. Shaffer Family Limited Partnership v. Zoning Hearing Board of Chanceford Township, the Commonwealth Court has shaken up the world of planned community and condominium practitioners as it has addressed, for the first time, the question of whether the Uniform Planned Community Act (and by reference the Uniform Condominium Act) supersede the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code subdivision requirements. Here is how the case arose. The Shaffer Family Limited Partnership owned 25 acres of vacant land. In June 2005, the partnership applied for a building permit for a single-family
    [Show full text]
  • Bankrupt Golf Courses: an Historical Analysis And
    BANKRUPT GOLF COURSES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIES FOR REPURPOSING by BLAKE JEFFREY CONANT (Under the Direction of Ron Sawhill) ABSTRACT More than 800 golf courses have closed since 2003 and approximately 1,000 to 2,500 are projected to close in the next decade. Many of these courses are repurposed as high-end mixed-use development, high-density residential, or big-box development. The sustainable benefits the golf course once provided either diminish or leave completely. As our countryʼs 21st Century needs shift towards food, water, and energy security, bankrupt golf courses can offer repurposing opportunities to plan for those needs. The goal of golf course repurposing should be to provide similar or greater sustainable benefits as the golf course once did. Understanding how that land can be sustainably repurposed is vital for local communities, environments, and economies to thrive in the 21st Century. This thesis will offer suggestions, strategies, and solutions for repurposing bankrupt golf courses that have yet to be implemented in the United States. INDEX WORDS: Golf, Golf Architecture, Golf Course, Golf Course Development, Land Use, Sustainability BANKRUPT GOLF COURSES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIES FOR REPURPOSING by BLAKE JEFFREY CONANT Bachelor of Fine Arts, The University of Montana, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2013 © 2013 Blake Conant All Rights Reserved BANKRUPT GOLF COURSES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIES FOR REPURPOSING by BLAKE JEFFREY CONANT Major Professor: Ron Sawhill Committee: Katherine Melcher Gary Green Tom Doak Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2013 DEDICATION For my mother, Margaret, who always gives me encouragement, support, and love.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Port Shopping Center 1408 Tallahassee Hwy Bainbridge, GA 39819 Lat 30.887, Long -84.567
    Inland Port Shopping Center 1408 Tallahassee Hwy Bainbridge, GA 39819 Lat 30.887, Long -84.567 PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Most national tenants of any center in DEMOGRAPHICS Bainbridge Market. In front of the only Wal-mart and next to the 1-Mile 3-Mile 5-Mile only Home Depot in Bainbridge. Radius Radius Radius Located on the intersection of Hwy 27 and Hwy 2017 Population 3,988 13,616 16,713 84, the most heavily traveled intersection in the 2022 Population 3,925 13,339 16,388 region. 2017 Average HH Income $50,964 $49,107 $49,399 Phase II - up to approximately 20,000 SF new 2017 Median HH Income $31,677 $31,157 $32,915 development Space can be sub-divided down to 1,600 SF Combined Traffic (2017): 23,040 CPD For a complete directory of our listings visit our website: Leasing Contact: www.crossmanco.com Sherri Mann No warranty expressed or implied has been made to the accuracy of the 404.514.3517 information provided herein, no liability assumed for error omission Licensed Real Estate Broker [email protected] Inland Port Shopping Center 1408 Tallahassee Hwy Bainbridge, GA 39819 Lat 30.887, Long -84.567 SITE PLAN STE TENANT SIZE A San Marcos Mexican Restaurant 4,000 OP5 B-C AVAILABLE 3,600 A B-C D E F G H I J K L M N D AT&T 1,600 E Little Caesar's 1,600 F Pet Sense 5,200 G Cato 3,900 H AVAILABLE 3,200 I Rent A Center 4,000 Phase II J Beef O' Brady 3,200 K Premier Vapors 1,600 Spaces can be OP3 sub-divided down L GameStop 1,600 T to 1,600 SF E E R M Sky Nails 1,600 T S N Cricket Wireless 2,400 E IC L OP 1 AVAILABLE +/- 33,600 SF A .
    [Show full text]
  • Second Submission Review– Citadel on Colfax Retail/Restaurant Phase I - Site Plan Application Number: DA-1422-09 Case Numbers: 2017-6017-01
    Planning & Development Services Planning Division 15151 E. Alameda Parkway, Ste. 2300 Aurora, Colorado 80012 303.739.7250 May 10, 2019 Jazzmine Clifton Northstar Commercial Partners 999 Broadway, Suite 3500 Denver, CO 80202 Re: Second Submission Review– Citadel on Colfax Retail/Restaurant Phase I - Site Plan Application Number: DA-1422-09 Case Numbers: 2017-6017-01 Dear Ms. Clifton: Thank you for your second submission, which we started to process on Monday, April 22, 2019. We reviewed it and attached our comments along with this cover letter. The first section of our review highlights our major comments. The following sections contain more specific comments, including those received from other city departments and community members. Since several important issues still remain, you will need to make another submission. Please revise your previous work and send us a new submission on or before Tuesday, June 4, 2019. Your administrative decision date is tentatively set for Wednesday, June 26, 2019. Note that all our comments are numbered. When you resubmit, include a cover letter specifically responding to each item. The Planning Department reserves the right to reject any resubmissions that fail to address these items. If you have made any other changes to your documents other than those requested, be sure to also specifically list them in your letter. As always, if you have any comments or concerns, please give me a call. I may be reached at 303-739-7209. Sincerely, Juliana Berry, Planner II City of Aurora Planning Department cc: Brian
    [Show full text]
  • SRO Tenants: Know Your Rights
    SRO Tenants: Know Your Rights WHAT IS A SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY BUILDING? A single-room-occupancy (SRO) building is usually a hotel or rooming house with rooms that do not have both a kitchen and a bathroom within the room. MOST SRO HOTELS ARE RENT-STABILIZED • Rent increases are regulated by law • Services (maid service, cleaning) may not be reduced NEW RESIDENTS CAN BECOME PERMANENT, RENT-STABILIZED TENANTS New residents can become permanent tenants protected by the Rent Stabilization Law by living in the hotel for 6 months or more OR by asking for a lease in writing. You do NOT have to get an actual lease to become a Permanent Tenant -- you only have to ask for one. Permanent Tenants or anyone who has lived there more than 30 days in a row CANNOT be evicted without a Court order and warrant. WHAT NEW RESIDENTS SHOULD KNOW • You do NOT have to leave the hotel after 21 days. • You will be protected by the Rent Stabilization Law IF you ask for a lease for 6 months or more. • You may ask for a lease at any time (even after living at the hotel for only 1 day). • MFY Legal Services has easy-to-use forms and can help you ask for a lease if you have not already done so. • Once you have lived in the hotel for 30 days in a row or have asked for a lease, you CANNOT be evicted without a Court order and warrant. WHAT PERMANENT TENANTS SHOULD KNOW • Permanent tenants have a right to stay in their rooms at the rent- stabilized rate without being charged more than the legal rent.
    [Show full text]