DOCSLIB.ORG

Second Submission Review– Citadel on Colfax Retail/Restaurant Phase I - Site Plan Application Number: DA-1422-09 Case Numbers: 2017-6017-01

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Second Submission Review– Citadel on Colfax Retail/Restaurant Phase I - Site Plan Application Number: DA-1422-09 Case Numbers: 2017-6017-01 Planning & Development Services Planning Division 15151 E. Alameda Parkway, Ste. 2300 Aurora, Colorado 80012 303.739.7250 May 10, 2019 Jazzmine Clifton Northstar Commercial Partners 999 Broadway, Suite 3500 Denver, CO 80202 Re: Second Submission Review– Citadel on Colfax Retail/Restaurant Phase I - Site Plan Application Number: DA-1422-09 Case Numbers: 2017-6017-01 Dear Ms. Clifton: Thank you for your second submission, which we started to process on Monday, April 22, 2019. We reviewed it and attached our comments along with this cover letter. The first section of our review highlights our major comments. The following sections contain more specific comments, including those received from other city departments and community members. Since several important issues still remain, you will need to make another submission. Please revise your previous work and send us a new submission on or before Tuesday, June 4, 2019. Your administrative decision date is tentatively set for Wednesday, June 26, 2019. Note that all our comments are numbered. When you resubmit, include a cover letter specifically responding to each item. The Planning Department reserves the right to reject any resubmissions that fail to address these items. If you have made any other changes to your documents other than those requested, be sure to also specifically list them in your letter. As always, if you have any comments or concerns, please give me a call. I may be reached at 303-739-7209. Sincerely, Juliana Berry, Planner II City of Aurora Planning Department cc: Brian Bratcher, Galloway & Company, 6162 S Willow Drive, Suite 320, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Susan Barkman, Neighborhood Liaison Cesarina Dancy, ODA Filed: K:\$DA\1422-09rev2.rtf Second Submission Review SUMMARY OF KEY COMMENTS FROM ALL DEPARTMENTS • Provide an approval letter from the Design Review Committee (see Item 1) • Make revisions to the Cover Sheet, including the Site Plan Notes, Vicinity Map and Data Block (see Item 1) • Amend all plan sheets to be consistent with layout, labeling, titles, and feature remnants (see Item 1) • Include cross sections of the view from Colfax Avenue south, including the street, buildings, grade change, utility connection screening walls, and retaining wall (see Item 2) • Plan for mid-block pedestrian connections across the drive lanes per the Design Guidelines (see Item 3) • Label all head-in, angled, and handicap parking spaces and aisles appropriately, and consider providing figures instead (see Item 4) • Revise the wall sign outlines, labels, and notes on Sheets A1 and A2, and add to the Data Block on the Cover Sheet accordingly, per the redline comments (see Item 5) • Provide a material board for the north elevation with the next submittal, and do not utilize EIFS. The colored building elevations should be submitted as a separate PDF (see Item 6) • Combine the Material Legend and Material Percentages boxes into one, fill in missing materials, eliminate the E- 1 EIFS material, and extrapolate the transparent glazing percentages for both the north and south elevation facades into a table (see Item 6) • Correct the public entrance doors versus service entrances for both buildings, per Design Guidelines and to be consistent from the Site Plan to the Building 1 and 2 Elevation labels (see Item 6) • Review all comments on the Landscape Plans and make necessary revisions (see Item 7) • Public Works/Civil Engineering cannot approve the Site Plan until the Preliminary Drainage Conformance Letter is approved (see Item 8) • Redesign the angled parking by Building 2 / Colfax Avenue to conform to head-in diagonal spaces (see Item 9) • Modify the fire hydrants as requested (see Item 10) • Adjust easement labels on the Site Plan, and start the easement dedication and license agreement processes. Finalize extinguishment of the Covenant restriction and Sideyard Agreement, and creation of a No-Build Agreement (see Items 12 and 13) • Respond to all additional redline comments on the Site Plan PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1. Completeness and Clarity of the Application Previous Comments, updated: 1A. Revise the Letter of Introduction per redline comments. 1B. Match the proposed lighting to the approved Master Plan lighting, or concurrently submit a Master Plan amendment application, or request a waiver and proceed to the Planning Commission instead of administratively. 1C. Make changes to the Vicinity Map per redline comments. 1D. The Design Review Committee still needs to be formalized and a letter must be submitted with the third submission stating the approval of the Site Plan. 1E. Many elements are either missing or incorrect in the Data Block. Please review all redline comments and revise the Data Block with the next submittal. 1E. Revise the title block on all sheets per comments on the Cover Sheet. 1F. Please be consistent with labeling and names of plan features throughout the plan set; see the redline comments. 1G. As a reminder, the City has developed CAD Data Submittal Standards for internal and external use to streamline the process of importing AutoCAD information into the city’s Enterprise GIS. Please note that a digital submission meeting the CAD Data Submittal Standards is required before your final Site Plan mylars can be routed for signatures or recorded. Please review the CAD Data Submittal Standards and email your Case Manager the .DWG file before submitting your final Site Plan mylars. Once received, the City’s AutoCAD Operator will run an audit report and your Case Manager will let you know within 2-3 days whether the .DWG file meets or does not meet the City’s CAD Data Submittal Standards. 2. Zoning and Land Use Issues 2A. Additional bicycle racks for each building are required to satisfy the SIR Handbook’s emphasis on ample bike spaces. 2B. Please provide a cross section(s) showing how visible buildings, utilities and roof equipment, and landscaping will be from Colfax Avenue given the walls and grade differences. 2C. In the Letter of Introduction, please outline which of the energy and resource conservation strategies will be used with this development per Section 146-737. The options are: passive solar, renewable energy, green infrastructure, heat island effect reduction, local production of healthy food, or building construction that exceeds current code requirements for energy efficiency. 3. Streets and Pedestrian Issues 3A. Please plan for mid-block connections across the “drive lane”s per the requirements in the Design Guidelines. Pedestrians should be able to safely cross here as these drive lanes intersect Planning Areas 2 and 3. Connectivity should be provided within each Planning Area and to adjacent Planning Areas. Please note that per Section 146-735, “there shall be a complete system of sidewalks and bicycle and pedestrian routes connecting to all uses on the site and to perimeter sidewalks or to adjacent properties and neighborhoods.” Any future land uses to the south will need to craft their layout to connect to yours. 3B. Include a color example of what the pavers crossing the drive lane will look like. 3C. Pedestrian lighting is required along Altura Boulevard per the approved Master Plan, but is not currently shown in your plan set. Please identify the locations of pedestrian lights on the Site Plan and Photometric Plan. 4. Parking Issues 4A. The angled parking spaces by Building 2 and Colfax Avenue should be reconfigured based on comments received from Traffic Engineering. Please account for these changes with the next submittal. 4B. Please be consistent and thorough when labeling the dimensions of the handicap, head-in, and angled parking spaces and associated aisles, and consider providing figures demonstrating compliance with Section 146-1509 (Figure 15.3) on Sheet C1.1 instead of cluttered labeling on the Site Plan sheet. 4C. Required handicap spaces are based off of the total number of spaces provided (which yields a requirement of 2)- reflect this in the Data Block, and eliminate any reference to required standard parking as the SIR district does not “require” any specific number of standard spaces. See redline comments. 4D. Clarify how the off-loading of trucks larger than the proposed loading spaces will be handled in the Letter of Introduction. 5. Signage Issues 5A. Eliminate illustration of the off-site monument signs on the Site Plan, and call out the on-site monument sign as “multitenant” per the approved Master Plan. 5B. Add a detail of the multitenant monument sign base to Sheet C1.1 (include material, height and size). 5C. Remove the wall sign outlines, dimension labels, and labels referring to Section 146-1613 and 70 square feet maximums from Sheets A1 and A2, but keep the first bulleted note under “Signage and Address Notes”. Add the “Signage and Address Notes” to Sheet A2. 6. Architectural and Urban Design Issues 6A. Please provide a material board for the north elevation and colored building elevations with the next submittal, and revise all boards to eliminate EIFS. Upgraded and durable stucco is acceptable, however. 6B. The colored building elevations should be a separate PDF, and should show the “RTU Beyond” facades. 6C. The public entrance doors versus service doors on the Site Plan should match Sheets A1 and A2 while keeping in mind that, per the Design Guidelines, buildings shall provide at least one primary building entry oriented to or visible from the public ROW. 6D. Match the two wall light names from the Photometric Plan to Building 1 and 2 Elevations. 6E. Combine the Material Legend and Material Percentages boxes on Sheets A1 and A2, fill in the missing materials, and eliminate the EIFS material (E-1). 6F. Break down the transparent glazing percentages for both the north and south elevation facades in a table on Sheets A1 and A2. 6G. Provide an approval letter from the Design Review Committee with the next submittal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Formerly Single Room Occupancy
    ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Marcia L. White Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 1· 1CJ. · 1-D Date sent to Council: 1. 2,, l£:l . 10 TO: Salt Lake City Council Chris Wharton, Chair SUBJECT: Revised Transmittal re: Petition PLNPCM2018-00066 - Shared Housing Zoning ------+e-x-t-A-11:i:fillEi-n.1ents--E-feHRe1:.iy-t-i-t-leEl---&i-ng-le--R00rn-Geeu13ane-y- E-8-RGj-'I=e*t'-Amendments-J1-------------'- STAFF CONTACT: Ashley Ogden, RDA Project Manager (formerly Principal Planner) (80 I) 535-7207, [email protected] DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached ordinance, which has been revised in response to feedback received during the City Council public hearing held on April 23, 2019, a meeting with local housing advocates held on Octa ber 22, 2019, and direction received from the Council during the November 19, 2019, work session. BUDGET IMP ACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This is a follow up briefing memo to the existing transmittal package for this proposal and includes the following updated infonnation: On March 19, 2019, Planning Division Staff briefed the City Council on a Mayor-initiated proposal to amend sections of the Zoning Ordinance to better define Single Room Occupancy (SRO) housing and determine appropriate locations within the City for the use. Proposed amendments included changing the existing definition of SRO Dwelling, expanding the number of zoning districts that pennit SR Os, and creating qualifying provisions for the use. The Council held a public hearing on April 23, 2019, where numerous residents with differing views provided comment: some expressed concerns with the potential negative impacts of SRO SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.S LC .GOV P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanistica N. 146 April-June 2011
    Urbanistica n. 146 April-June 2011 Distribution by www.planum.net Index and english translation of the articles Paolo Avarello The plan is dead, long live the plan edited by Gianfranco Gorelli Urban regeneration: fundamental strategy of the new structural Plan of Prato Paolo Maria Vannucchi The ‘factory town’: a problematic reality Michela Brachi, Pamela Bracciotti, Massimo Fabbri The project (pre)view Riccardo Pecorario The path from structure Plan to urban design edited by Carla Ferrari A structural plan for a ‘City of the wine’: the Ps of the Municipality of Bomporto Projects and implementation Raffaella Radoccia Co-planning Pto in the Val Pescara Mariangela Virno Temporal policies in the Abruzzo Region Stefano Stabilini, Roberto Zedda Chronographic analysis of the Urban systems. The case of Pescara edited by Simone Ombuen The geographical digital information in the planning ‘knowledge frameworks’ Simone Ombuen The european implementation of the Inspire directive and the Plan4all project Flavio Camerata, Simone Ombuen, Interoperability and spatial planners: a proposal for a land use Franco Vico ‘data model’ Flavio Camerata, Simone Ombuen What is a land use data model? Giuseppe De Marco Interoperability and metadata catalogues Stefano Magaudda Relationships among regional planning laws, ‘knowledge fra- meworks’ and Territorial information systems in Italy Gaia Caramellino Towards a national Plan. Shaping cuban planning during the fifties Profiles and practices Rosario Pavia Waterfrontstory Carlos Smaniotto Costa, Monica Bocci Brasilia, the city of the future is 50 years old. The urban design and the challenges of the Brazilian national capital Michele Talia To research of one impossible balance Antonella Radicchi On the sonic image of the city Marco Barbieri Urban grapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Club Rio Rancho Golf Course Charrette Report
    CLUB RIO RANCHO GOLF COURSE CHARRETTE REPORT July, 2017 Prepared For: Prepared by: The City of Rio Rancho Consensus Planning, Inc. 3200 Civic Center Cir NE, 302 Eighth Street NW Rio Rancho, NM 87144 Albuquerque, NM 87102 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Scope and Purpose 3 Background 5 • Introduction 5 • Case Studies 6 • Site History 8 Methods 9 • Overview 9 • Introductory Meeting - April 21 9 • Charrette – May 5 10 • Charrette Results 11 • Charrette Follow Up – June 9 17 Next Steps 19 • Property Owner 19 • Stakeholders 19 • City of Rio Rancho 19 • Critical Elements of the Master Plan 20 • Final Notes 20 Appendix A: Meeting Sign-In 21 Sheets Appendix B: Meeting Notes 25 Page 1 Page 2 Scope and Purpose Once a hallmark of the City of Rio Rancho, Club Rio Rancho struggled financially in the 2000’s before finally closing in 2016. Degrading conditions and concern from local stakeholders caused the City to take an active roll facilitating a conversation and charrette in the Spring of 2017. Consensus Planning was hired to facilitate this dialogue among stakeholders in order to develop potential solutions for the site. Club Rio Rancho shut down its North 9 in land use alternatives. Following this 2013, eventually closing its doors entirely charrette, Consensus Planning was to in December of 2016. Since that time the explore these potential alternatives, future of the course’s roughly 260 acres combining them into land use plans, has been a topic of heated debate for and providing analysis regarding how the property’s owners, local residents, these alternatives might progress into city staff, and potential developers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankrupt Golf Courses: an Historical Analysis And
    BANKRUPT GOLF COURSES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIES FOR REPURPOSING by BLAKE JEFFREY CONANT (Under the Direction of Ron Sawhill) ABSTRACT More than 800 golf courses have closed since 2003 and approximately 1,000 to 2,500 are projected to close in the next decade. Many of these courses are repurposed as high-end mixed-use development, high-density residential, or big-box development. The sustainable benefits the golf course once provided either diminish or leave completely. As our countryʼs 21st Century needs shift towards food, water, and energy security, bankrupt golf courses can offer repurposing opportunities to plan for those needs. The goal of golf course repurposing should be to provide similar or greater sustainable benefits as the golf course once did. Understanding how that land can be sustainably repurposed is vital for local communities, environments, and economies to thrive in the 21st Century. This thesis will offer suggestions, strategies, and solutions for repurposing bankrupt golf courses that have yet to be implemented in the United States. INDEX WORDS: Golf, Golf Architecture, Golf Course, Golf Course Development, Land Use, Sustainability BANKRUPT GOLF COURSES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIES FOR REPURPOSING by BLAKE JEFFREY CONANT Bachelor of Fine Arts, The University of Montana, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2013 © 2013 Blake Conant All Rights Reserved BANKRUPT GOLF COURSES: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIES FOR REPURPOSING by BLAKE JEFFREY CONANT Major Professor: Ron Sawhill Committee: Katherine Melcher Gary Green Tom Doak Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2013 DEDICATION For my mother, Margaret, who always gives me encouragement, support, and love.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Planned Communities Is a Clear Statement of the Design Issues That Are Critical to Creating Livable and Well-Designed Planned Communities
    URBAN DEVELOPMENT DESIGNING PLANNED Th e compositional form of most planned communities defi nes their development struc- ture. Th ey became popular because of development problems that arose under traditional zoning and subdivision regulations, which did not originally include this concept. Th e zoning ordinance regulates land uses and lot sizes. Th e subdivision ordinance regulates DESIGNING PLANNED street and block layouts and requires developers to provide public infrastructure such as streets, sewers, and other utilities. Th ere is a gap here. Neither ordinance gives designers or developers the fl exibility to design a planned community that includes common open space, resource protection, and better and varied design. Th is book shows how to design COMMUNITIES planned communities that overcome these problems. “Designing Planned Communities is a clear statement of the design issues that are critical to creating livable and well-designed planned communities. Professor Man- delker draws on his long experience with planned community and land use regula- tion to explain the meaning of good design for planned communities. He shows how design concepts for planned communities can be translated into effective de- COMMUNITIES sign guidance by local governments. Examples of design standards are provided from comprehensive plans, design guidelines, design manuals, and planned community regulations. Throughout Designing Planned Communities, the reader is taken through the complex problems of design regulation to an eff ective design program that can create planned communities in which we want to live. Planners and lawyers will be interested in what Mandelker has to say about the design issues facing a growing number of planned communities throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • 50The 50 Largest U.S. Seniors Housing Real Estate Owners and Operators
    2020 ASHA The 50 largest U.S. 50seniors housing real estate owners and operators The Hacienda at the River in Tucson, Arizona, operated by Watermark Retirement Communities. Special supplement to n Seniors Housing Business n Heartland Real Estate Business n Northeast Real Estate Business An exclusive n Southeast Real Estate Business report from the n Texas Real Estate Business American Seniors n Western Real Estate Business Housing Association Excellence. Sustained. Strong relationships with true industry leaders are more vital than ever in these unprecedented times. For more than 20 years, Ventas has been a proud partner and investor supporting best-in-class senior living operators and providers. We continue to be inspired by their tireless work in helping to keep seniors safe and well. As one of the world’s premier capital providers, Ventas remains deeply committed to the success of our shareholders and business partners, and to the individuals and families they serve. ventasreit.com SENIOR HOUSING | MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS | RESEARCH & INNOVATION HEALTH SYSTEMS | POST ACUTE CARE TRUSTED SENIORS HOUSING ADVISORS FOR ALL YOUR Excellence. INVESTMENT NEEDS Sustained. Our nationally-recognized platform has expertise Strong relationships with true industry leaders are more vital in projects of all sizes and scopes than ever in these unprecedented times. For more than 20 years, Ventas has been a proud partner and investor supporting best-in-class senior living operators and providers. We continue to be inspired by their tireless work in helping to keep seniors safe and well. As one of the world’s premier capital providers, Ventas remains deeply committed to the success of our shareholders and business partners, and to the individuals and families they serve.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenfield Development Without Sprawl: the Role of Planned Communities
    Greenfield Development Without Sprawl: The Role of Planned Communities Jim Heid Urban Land $ Institute About ULI–the Urban Land Institute ULI–the Urban Land Institute is a nonprofit education and research institute that is supported by its members. Its mis- sion is to provide responsible leadership in the use of land in order to enhance the total environment. ULI sponsors education programs and forums to encourage an open international exchange of ideas and sharing of experiences; initiates research that anticipates emerging land use trends and issues and proposes creative solutions based on that research; provides advisory services; and publishes a wide variety of materials to disseminate information on land use and development. Established in 1936, the Institute today has more than 20,000 members and associates from more than 60 countries representing the entire spectrum of the land use and development disciplines. ULI Working Papers on Land Use Policy and Practice. ULI is in the forefront of national discussion and debate on the leading land use policy and practice issues of the day. To encourage and enrich that dialogue, ULI publishes summaries of its forums on land use policy topics and commissions papers by noted thinkers on a range of topics relevant to its research and education agenda. Through its Working Papers on Land Use Policy and Practice series, the Institute hopes to increase the body of knowledge and offer useful insights that contribute to improvements in the quality of land use and real estate development practice throughout the country. Richard M. Rosan President About This Paper ULI Project Staff The Urban Land Institute is recognized as the leading Rachelle L.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Planning
    Urban planning 1 History Further information: History of urban planning There is evidence of urban planning and designed com- munities dating back to the Mesopotamian, Indus Valley, Minoan, and Egyptian civilizations in the third millen- nium BCE. Archeologists studying the ruins of cities in these areas find paved streets that were laid out at right angles in a grid pattern.[5] The idea of a planned out ur- ban area evolved as different civilizations adopted it. Be- ginning in the 8th century BCE, Greek city states were primarily centered on orthogonal (or grid-like) plans.[6] Urban planning designs settlements, from the smallest towns to The ancient Romans, inspired by the Greeks, also used the largest cities. Shown here is Hong Kong from Western District orthogonal plans for their cities. City planning in the Ro- overlooking Kowloon, across Victoria Harbour. man world was developed for military defense and pub- lic convenience. The spread of the Roman Empire sub- sequently spread the ideas of urban planning. As the Roman Empire declined, these ideas slowly disappeared. However, most large cities in Europe still held onto the planned Roman city center. Most cities in Europe, from Urban planning is a technical and political process the 9th to 14th centuries, grew organically and sometimes concerned with the use of land, protection and use chaotically. The Renaissance in Europe started to bring of the environment, public welfare, and the design of back some of these planning and design ideas. During the urban environment, including air, water, and the the Enlightenment period, several European rulers ambi- infrastructure passing into and out of urban areas such tiously attempted to redesign capital cities.
    [Show full text]
  • House-To-Sro Conversion
    HOUSE-TO-SRO CONVERSION Eugene has a shortage of Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) housing. One way to quickly create more is to convert conventional housing into SRO facilities. A SRO is a cross between a group home and a conventional rooming house that can be tailored to meet the needs of a managing organization and selected tenants. Houses might serve specific populations, such as veterans, refugees, or people living with mental illness, people who are medically fragile or people recovering from addiction. Supervision can range from a daily or monthly staff visit to installing a full-time resident manager. SROs are ideal for individuals who use Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) or Section 8 vouchers, which do not cover conventional “roommate” situations. In a SRO tenants rent individual rooms and have access to shared bathrooms, kitchens, and other living spaces. SROs are generally more affordable, and they have the added benefit of allowing clients to build up good rental histories, so that they can more easily rent apartments in the future. What’s required for a SRO conversion? Are there zoning restrictions? To meet Section 8 / Housing and Urban Development Residential zones (R-1–R-4) have different restrictions (HUD) requirements1, most conversions require: on the number of bedrooms and other factors. So to 1. At least 110 square feet of floor space, and at least determine the zoning of a particular property you can 4 square feet of closet space with an unobstructed visit our website at www.eugene-or.gov/zoningmap. height of at least five feet, for each SRO unit.
    [Show full text]
  • SF-HSA Managers/City Department Representatives From: Dan Kelly Re: Fiscal and Policy Implications for Single Room Occupancy Hotels
    Department of Aging and Adult Services Gavin Newsom, Mayor Trent Rhorer, Executive Director November 2, 2009 To: SF-HSA Managers/City Department Representatives From: Dan Kelly Re: Fiscal and Policy Implications for Single Room Occupancy Hotels This memo highlights findings from previous SRO studies, considering them within the context of city policy, and adds new fiscal analysis and research. It is organized into sections that describe three different SRO populations: 1) seniors; 2) adults with disabilities; and 3) families and children. Seniors San Francisco’s official policy is to support seniors to “age in place” in their own homes (Long Term Care Coordinating Council, 2009). Though often overlooked, many low income seniors call SROs home. These hotels provide affordable, centrally-located housing that allows older persons to remain in the community. Yet San Francisco has no comprehensive strategy for serving a group that, because of poverty, isolation, and hazardous physical environments, is at particular risk for entering institutions. Ms. Fribourg matched SRO Age Distribution of SRO Residents Overall (N=11,659) addresses against caseload data 3 from city programs and found over 2.5 11,000 unique clients lived in these 2 hotels. 1 Based on Ms. Fribourg’s 1.5 estimate of 18,500 total SRO residents in San Francisco, it 1 0.5 would mean that 63% of all SRO Percentage of SRO Residents residents are either clients of SF- 0 HSA or are receiving SSI. The 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 Age (years) data match was used to infer a profile of who was living in SROs.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book Planning Theory Ebook Free Download
    PLANNING THEORY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Philip Allmendinger | 280 pages | 15 Sep 2009 | Palgrave MacMillan | 9780230223653 | English | New York, NY, United Kingdom Planning Theory PDF Book By grounding these theories in the contemporary experiences of planners, students and practitioners can better grasp planning theory and understand its continued relevance. This article has multiple issues. Lane notes that it is most useful to think of these model as emerging from a social transformation planning tradition as opposed to a social guidance one, so the emphasis is more bottom-up in nature than it is top-down. Campus Research park Satellite campus Science park. October Learn how and when to remove this template message. Due to the high level of training required to grasp these methods, however, rational planning fails to provide an avenue for public participation. And finally, the project did not affect, positively or negatively, neighborhood crowding problems that residents were concerned about. The rational model is perhaps the most widely accepted model among planning practitioners and scholars and is considered by many to be the orthodox view of planning. Transactive planning focuses on interpersonal dialogue that develops ideas, which will be turned into action. Jobs Senior Planner. Namespaces Article Talk. While it may seem odd to look to the past for lessons in how to integrate lay knowledge and expertise into planning more environmentally-friendly cities, it seems unnecessary to underscore the continued relevance of Cleveland's Norman Krumholz' promotion of equity as a guiding frame. Beginning in the late s and early s, critiques of the rational paradigm began to emerge and formed into several different schools of planning thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Single-Room Occupancy Hotels
    PRESERVING SINGLE-ROOM OCCUPANCY HOTELS by NATHAN ANDREW BEVIL (Under the Direction of Eric A. MacDonald) ABSTRACT Single-room occupancy hotels are a unique part of the urban cultural landscape in America overlooked by the field of historic preservation. SRO hotels developed out of a need to provide cheap housing in urban centers to middle and lower class workers during the early twentieth century. Historic preservationists have only recently recognized the significance of these structures and the part they have played in the development of American cities. These buildings provide an important link to the early women’s liberation and gay rights movements in America. The current residents of SRO hotels rely on the building to provide shelter and social services. Due to their location downtown and the sources of funding available, rehabilitating SRO hotels is an economical option for housing. Historic preservationists must begin to recognize the significance of SRO hotels and their place within the urban landscape. INDEX WORDS: Historic Preservation, Single-Room Occupancy Hotels, SRO, Hotel PRESERVING SINGLE-ROOM OCCUPANCY HOTELS by NATHAN ANDREW BEVIL B.A., Mary Washington College, 2004 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ATHENS, GEORGIA 2009 © 2009 Nathan Andrew Bevil All Rights Reserved PRESERVING SINGLE-ROOM OCCUPANCY HOTELS by NATHAN ANDREW BEVIL Major Professor: Eric A. MacDonald Committee: Wayde A. Brown Andrew T. Carswell Allison Duncan Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2009 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all of my professors, both at University of Georgia and Mary Washington College, for their help and support in this project and in all my academic endeavors.
    [Show full text]