DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Tracking Matrix October 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Tracking Matrix October 2019 RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: October 2019 Tracking Completed Projects on Contaminated Lands, Landfills, and Mine Sites The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recognizes the overall RE-Powering America’s environmental benefit of siting renewable energy projects on contaminated Land Initiative properties. EPA’s RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative, tracks renewable energy projects on formerly contaminated lands, landfills, and mine sites to educate To provide information on renewable energy on 1 stakeholders and encourage future site development. EPA has identified current contaminated land projects not currently appearing in trends in renewable energy development on contaminated lands including: this document, email [email protected]. • 352 renewable energy installations identified to date • 91% of the installations are solar PV • 64% of the installations are located on former landfills • Massachusetts continues to lead the nation in siting solar on landfills and other sites with roughly one third of all installations in the U.S. To date, the RE-Powering Initiative has identified 352 renewable energy installations on 327 contaminated lands, landfills, and mine sites,2 with a cumulative installed capacity of 1,710.2 megawatts (MW). Approximately 72% of these installations are large-scale systems with a project capacity of 1 MW or more. The renewable energy is used to export energy onto the utility grid, offset onsite energy demands, or power cleanup of contaminated sites. This document provides summary statistics and analyses regarding the types of projects (e.g., system sizes, renewable energy technologies, energy uses) that have been completed on contaminated properties to date. At the end of this document, EPA includes a project tracking list with basic information that is publicly reported about each known, completed installation. In addition to the completed sites listed in this document, EPA is actively tracking more than 140 renewable energy projects that are in various stages of planning, approval, or construction on contaminated properties. These include a solar project on a landfill in East Hampton, NY; a 5.3-MW solar installation on a Laytonsville, MD landfill; and a 180-MW solar project on a former open-pit coal mine in Lewis County, WA. Examination of the information in this document may assist in the future planning for development of renewable energy installations. 352 Renewable Energy Projects, Over 1.7 Gigawatt Installed Capacity Technologies Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Wind Multiple Geothermal Biopower Capacity (MW) < 2 2 - 5 5 - 20 20 -35 > 35 Alaska Hawai'i Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands This map is for informational purposes only. The information was gathered from public announcements of renewable energy projects in the form of company press releases, news releases, and, in some cases, conversations with the parties involved. This map may not be a comprehensive representation of all completed renewable energy projects September 2019 on contaminated lands. To provide information on additional projects, please email [email protected]. 1 Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills (referred to as RE on CL). 2 In this document, installation and project refer to a single renewable energy technology installation, while site and location refer to a single contaminated property. A site or location may have more than one installation or project. For example, the former Dave Johnston Mine (one site) has three separate wind installations. Multiple installation details can be seen in the tracking spreadsheet at the end of this document. Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis 1 Office of Land and Emergency Management RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: October 2019 Tracking Completed Projects on Contaminated Lands, Landfills, and Mine Sites National Deployment RE-Powering has identified installations of renewable energy on contaminated lands, landfills, and mine sites in 41 U.S. states and territories. The location of these installations generally reflect evolving trends linked to incentives or policies such as Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPSs), tax exemptions, net metering laws and others. Renewable resource (e.g., solar incidence) and other technical considerations are important as well. The table below features a “RE-Powering Policy” column. This column identifies states that have enacted policies that specifically support or incentivize renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and brownfields. One example is Massachusetts’ Solar Renewable Energy Certificates program, which assigns higher credits to solar projects sited on brownfields and landfills. Additional states are considering implementing such policies, incentives and other initiatives; for example, Minnesota recently funded a study to explore the potential to deploy solar PV on sites within its Closed Landfill Program.3 41 States and Territories Have Renewable Energy Projects on Contaminated Lands 6 1 1 2 4 11 1 Massachusetts - 114 4 30 5 3 17 Rhode Island - 8 2 6 2 1 8 New Jersey - 42 1 2 6 18 9 Delaware - 3 3 1 2 Maryland - 9 2 5 4 2 2 1 3 4 2 0 1 2 3 - 5 6 - 20 21 - 40 4 1 41 - 114 Alaska Hawai'i Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands This map is for informational purposes only. The information was gathered from public announcements of renewable energy projects in the form of company press releases, news releases, and, in some cases, conversations with the parties involved. This map may not be a comprehensive representation of all completed renewable energy projects September 2019 on contaminated lands. To provide information on additional projects, please email [email protected]. 3 Funding as part of the Environment and Natural Resources Appropriations (Sec. 2, Subd 9 - https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?version=latest&session=ls91&number=SF0007&session_ year=2019&session_number=1&format=pdf) Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis 2 Office of Land and Emergency Management RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: October 2019 Tracking Completed Projects on Contaminated Lands, Landfills, and Mine Sites RE ON CL INSTALLATIONS BY STATE State Renewable Portfolio State # Installations Installed Capacity (MW) Standard4 RE-Powering Policy5 MA 114 301.1 NJ 42 196.3 NY 30 111.4 CA 18 146.0 CT 17 57.7 VT 11 22.2 MD 9 48.0 CO 9 9.3 RI 8 28.3 OH 8 17.2 PA 6 178.5 IN 6 41.9 6 ME 6 2.0 7 WY 5 295.8 TN 5 12.8 AZ 4 30.0 TX 4 14.6 8 WI 4 3.9 9 MN 4 0.5 VA 3 4.9 10 MI 3 2.4 GA 3 3.2 DE 3 2.7 NV 2 28.2 OR 2 100.1 IL 2 10.9 IA 2 5.5 KY 2 5.0 NM 2 3.0 FL 2 2.3 NC 2 0.6 OK 2 0.0 11 RoUS12 12 24.0 TOTAL 352 1,710.2 4 A renewable portfolio standard (RPS) requires utilities to use or procure a certain percentage of total generation from renewable sources. Policy data in this section are primarily from the Database for State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE), a comprehensive database managed by the North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center and originally funded by the U.S. Department of Energy. DSIRE compiles renewable energy and energy efficiency incentives and policies enacted by the federal government, state governments, U.S. territories, local governments, and large utilities. The DSIRE website allows users to search policies by state and provides summary maps. 5 This includes policy related to procurement requirements, financial incentives and state initiatives for development of contaminated lands. 6 Indiana’s Clean Energy Portfolio Standard sets a voluntary goal of 10% clean energy by 2025 for each utility, based on the amount of electricity supplied by the utility in 2010. 7 Maine’s renewable portfolio standard required that, by 2017, 30% of Maine load be satisfied by existing renewable electricity generation and 10% of Maine load be satisfied by new renewable resources.Compliance data for 2017 are not yet available. 8 Texas has already achieved its 2025 RPS goal. 9 Wisconsin’s RPS required 10% of all electric energy consumed in the state to come from renewable energy sources by 2015. The Public Service Commission’s most recent RPS report confirms all utilities were in compliance for 2016. 10 Virginia has a voluntary renewable portfolio goal that provides an enhanced rate of return for renewable generation from approved projects. 11 Oklahoma’s RPS is a goal, not a requirement. The goal called for 15% of the state’s total installed generation capacity to be derived from renewable sources by 2015. In its 2016 report, the Oklahoma Corporation Commission calculated the 2015 total capacity of electricity from renewable energy at 26%. 12 For purposes of this report, RoUS (Rest of US) indicates 9 other states or territories with renewable energy on contaminated lands: Hawaii, North Dakota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, South Carolina, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Utah. Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis 3 Office of Land and Emergency Management RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: October 2019 Tracking Completed Projects on Contaminated Lands, Landfills, and Mine Sites Inside the Numbers Based on current trends, 72% of the renewable energy systems identified in the tracking matrix sell power back to the grid as wholesale electricity, while another 22% provides energy via community solar projects or for onsite use. Systems range from utility-scale projects, such as 13 MW of solar PV on a South Brunswick, NJ landfill, to smaller community-scale projects, such as the 0.2-MW community solar installation on a Norwood, CO landfill. RE-Powering capitalizes on the opportunity to address contamination and support renewable energy implementation to achieve the associated economic and environmental benefits. Installations to date demonstrate the viability of projects across all EPA and state remediation programs, from powering industrial facilities at sites subject to RCRA corrective action to offsetting the energy demands at federal facilities with ongoing cleanup activities to repurposing brownfield and Superfund sites.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TRENDS in PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey Report of Selected IEA Countries Between 1992 and 2011
    TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2011 Report IEA-PVPS T1-21:2012 TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2011 Contents Introduction 2 1 Implementation of PV systems 3 2 The PV industry 24 3 Policy, regulatory and business framework for deployment 32 4 Summary of trends 39 PV technology note 44 Foreword This year’s 17th edition of the IEA PVPS international survey report on Trends in Photovoltaic (PV) Applications falls together with almost 20 years of global cooperation within the IEA PVPS The International Energy Agency (IEA), founded in 1974, Programme. The history of PV market deployment over this is an autonomous body within the framework of the decisive period for PV from its very first market developments to Organization for Economic Cooperation and the present large scale deployment, meanwhile accounting for Development (OECD). The IEA carries out a important shares of the newly installed capacity for electricity comprehensive programme of energy cooperation production, can uniquely be followed year by year in the series among its 28 member countries and with the of IEA PVPS trends reports. 2011 has been yet another year of unprecedented further market growth, continued massive participation of the European Commission. cost reduction and ongoing signs of industry and market consolidation. In total, about 28 GW of PV capacity were The IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme installed in the IEA PVPS countries during 2011 (2010: 14,2 GW), (IEA PVPS) is one of the collaborative research and thus again doubling the installed capacity of the year before; this development agreements within the IEA and was raised the total installed capacity in IEA PVPS countries close to established in 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Amherst Request for Proposals
    TOWN OF AMHERST REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR OLD LANDFILL REUSE PROPOSAL Presented by: In partnership with: Letter of Transmittal............................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 8 1. Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................................................ 10 1.1. Proposal protects the existing landfill caps. ...............................................................................10 1.2. Proposal protects operation of landfill gas systems...................................................................10 1.3. Experience of team proposing project........................................................................................10 1.4. Risk to human, health and the environment..............................................................................11 1.5. Effect on the environment..........................................................................................................11 1.6. Project compatibility with neighboring properties.....................................................................12 1.7. Noise levels from use of site.......................................................................................................12 1.7. Best compensation to Town of Amherst ....................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • BNEF Long Form
    THE EVOLVING LANDSCAPE FOR EPCS IN US RENEWABLES 14 OCTOBER 2014 SECTION 4. THE PLAYERS This section of the report analyzes players in EPC for solar and wind in the US. About this analysis This section is based mostly on data gathered from companies’ websites. Much of this analysis relies on linking firms to projects in our database, which contains nearly 3,000 wind and solar projects in the US at various stages of development. The information mapping projects to their EPCs is captured in our Industry Intelligence database, available to subscribers of our service. There are a number of assumptions, caveats, and methodological points that are important to note in the context of this analysis; an Appendix at the end of this report identifies these. 4.1. LEAGUE TABLES The charts below show the top EPC firms for solar and wind, ranked strictly in terms of historic activity – ie, this does not reflect any kind of qualitative assessment about firms’ competencies. • Top-ranked solar EPCs includes the three vertically-integrated giants – SunPower, First Solar, and SunEdison – and some EPC specialists, like Bechtel and Fluor, that have performed a small number of very large projects. • The league tables for wind are headlined by Mortenson, IEA, RES Americas, and Blattner (with Blattner under-represented, as explained in the Appendix). Figure 8: Top EPC firms for US utility-scale solar (GW of Figure 9: Top EPC firms for US wind (GW of ‘active’ ‘active’ projects) projects) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 4 8 12 SunPower MA Mortenson Co First Solar Inc IEA / White Construction MA Mortenson Co RES Americas E Light Wind and Solar Michels Corp Abengoa Blattner Energy Inc Bechtel Power Corp Wanzek Construction SunEdison Fluor Rosendin Electric Inc AMEC Tetra Tech Construction Inc Strata Solar LLC Signal Energy LLC Blymyer Engineers Dashiell Swinerton Inc TVIG / American Helios Blattner Energy Inc Reed & Reed Inc Baker Electric S&C Electric Co Blue Oak Energy Inc Barton Malow Co ARB Jay Cashman, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW to Acquire First Australian Asset: Manildra Solar Power Plant 25 June 2018
    RENEWABLE ENERGY. SUSTAINABLE INVESTING NEW to acquire first Australian asset: Manildra Solar Power Plant 25 June 2018 Questions to the New Energy Solar management team can be addressed to [email protected] 1 Manildra Solar Power Plant – May 2018 Disclaimer This document is prepared by New Energy Solar Manager Pty Limited (ACN 609 166 645) (Investment Manager), a corporate authorised representative (CAR No. 1237667) of Walsh & Company Asset Management Pty Limited (ACN 159 902 708, AFSL 450 257), and investment manager for New Energy Solar Fund (ARSN 609 154 298) (Trust), and New Energy Solar Limited (ACN 609 396 983) (Company). The Trust and the Company (together with their controlled entities) are referred to as the ‘Business’, ‘NEW’ or ‘New Energy Solar’. This document may contain general advice. Any general advice provided has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on the advice, you should consider the appropriateness of the advice with regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. This document may contain statements, opinions, projections, forecasts and other material (forward looking statements), based on various assumptions. Those assumptions may or may not prove to be correct. The Investment Manager and its advisers (including all of their respective directors, consultants and/or employees, related bodies corporate and the directors, shareholders, managers, employees or agents of any of them) (Parties) do not make any representation as to the accuracy or likelihood of fulfilment of the forward-looking statements or any of the assumptions upon which they are based. Actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially from any projections and forward looking statements and the assumptions on which those statements are based.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating U.S. Solar Contractors
    July 2017 www.solarpowerworldonline.com Technology • Development • Installation CELEBRATING U.S. SOLAR CONTRACTORS Cover_July 2017_Vs3.indd 1 6/30/17 8:32 AM HONORING THE BEST OF THE INDUSTRY The 2017 class of Top Solar Contractors is dedicated to bringing solar to the United States. The following pages honor the hard-working efforts of 500 solar companies across the country. The Top 500 List Begins On The Next Page Lists By Market p.52 Lists By Top States p.87 Lists By Service p.68 Contractors Across America p.105 INTRO Top 500_Vs2kp.indd 1 6/30/17 9:16 AM = UTILITY CONTRACTOR = RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTOR = COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTOR = OFF-GRID CONTRACTOR = EPC = INSTALLATION SUBCONTRACTOR = ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR = DEVELOPER = ROOFTOP CONTRACTOR Pie pieces represent all services and markets in which a company works RANK & STATE/ PRIMARY TOTAL KILOWATTS ALL ALL PRIMARY COMPANY CITY TERRITORY FOUNDED EMPLOYEES MARKET INSTALLED INSTALLED SERVICES MARKETS SERVICE KILOWATTS IN 2016 OFFERED SERVED 21 CSI Electrical Contractors Santa Fe Springs CA 1990 1000 1,231,825 281,805 22 E Light Electric Services Englewood CO 1998 255 1,752,050 276,430 23 Moss Fort Lauderdale FL 2004 600 790,015 244,015 24 Vivint Solar Lehi UT 2011 5000 680,000 221,500 25 DKD Electric Albuquerque NM 1978 129 370,120 220,400 26 Bombard Renewable Energy Las Vegas NV 1982 800 420,033 219,494 27 SunEnergy1 Mooresville NC 2009 211 706,000 214,000 28 DEPCOM Power Scottsdale AZ 2013 84 390,000 205,000 29 Cantsink Lilburn GA 1988 50 416,000 197,387 30 CSW Contractors Scottsdale AZ 1982 350 1,669,000 195,000 31 HCS Renewable Energy Round Rock TX 2014 425 553,000 189,000 32 Primoris Renewable Energy Denver CO 2013 20 479,000 186,000 33 The Ryan Company Greenwood Village CO 1949 100 536,496 182,294 34 juwi Boulder CO 2008 60 420,000 182,089 35 ESA Renewables Sanford FL 2002 25 615,000 165,011 36 Hypower Fort Lauderdale FL 1991 450 425,000 165,000 37 J&B Solar Cocoa FL 2013 85 360,000 160,000 38 J.
    [Show full text]
  • RAM 6 and GTSR Participants Webinar Attendees
    Company Name: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Event Title: RAM 6 and GTSR Participants Webinar Event Date: 14-Jul-15 Event Time: 9:00 AM PPT Name Company 1 Abram Pearlman Cumulus Energy Scource 2 Alison Khalaf Pristine Sun 3 Angela Plummer Pristine Sun 4 Avram Pearlman Cumulus Energy Storage 5 Boyega Ajayi SolarReserve 6 Carolyn Campbell Recurrent Energy 7 Cynthia Hernandez Ormat Nevada Inc 8 Daniel Kim Westlands Solar Park 9 David Bruder Lockheed Martin 10 David Moran Drilling And Trenchi 11 Davin Arvonen Rds Properties 12 Deborah Builder 8 Minutenerty 13 Dipa Sharif ConEdison Development 14 Ed Cook E.ON 15 Eric Larson 8minutenergy Renewables 16 Erin Kenney Anahau Energy 17 Eun Gi Chung 8minutenergy Renewables 18 Frank Mossburg Boston Pacific Company 19 Fred Hanks Cal-Pacific Carbon 20 Fred Vaske 8minutenergy 21 Genevieve Liang Mirasol Development 22 Hans Stullken North State Solar 23 Harrison Luna Hecate Energy 24 Jack Pigott First Solar 25 James Cook First Solar 26 James Kelly Nrg Renew Llc 27 Jamie Nagel ZGlobal 28 Jason Joner Modoc Capital 29 Jennifer Desrosier SunEdison 30 Jennifer Hunt FuelCell Energy 31 Joe Briney sPower 32 John Barnes Solar Land Partners.Inc 33 John Monahan JCM Associates 34 jonathan Mancini Bridgewell Resources 35 Jonathan Rappe Soldevco 36 Josh Martin Westlands Solar Park 37 Joshua Martin Westlands Solar Park 38 Julian Chapa Julian Chapa 39 Kathryn Malone Edf Renewable Energy 40 Kayvon Deldawr SPower 41 Kenneth Quigley Cal-Pacific Carbon, LLC 42 Lee Kossla Colemko Llc 43 Marvis Averett Drilling World 44 Matt Barnes Grid Subject Matter Experts, LLC 45 Mhe Uruville Dell Toll Energy 46 Michael Joh Eight Minute Energy 47 Michael Morianti Abengoa Solar 48 Nicole Lepre Con Edison Development, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of Solar Power Purchase Agreements December 22, 2020
    Audit of Solar Power Purchase Agreements December 22, 2020 By Onondaga County Comptroller Martin D. Masterpole Report Index Report Section Name Page Section Number I Background and Executive Summary 2 II Scope and Methodology 6 III Findings and Recommendations 7 IV Exhibits 25 V Departmental Responses 30 VI Clarification of Management Response 37 1 SECTION I BACKGROUND AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background In 2013 and again in 2014, Onondaga County (County) began to pursue solar power solutions using a request for proposals (RFP) process. At the conclusion of the RFP process, the County executed Commercial Purchase and Performance Guarantee agreements (Contracts) with SolarCity Corporation (SolarCity), a company which sells large-scale solar power solutions. The County is currently contracted with Solar City and purchasing solar energy at three sites—Oak Orchard Lagoons, Oak Orchard Waste Water Treatment Plant and Jamesville Correctional Facility. The Contracts with SolarCity included the construction of arrays of solar energy collecting panels to be built at the three sites. While the County retains ownership of the land at the sites, Solar City owns and maintains the panels. Each site has a 20-year contract and upon conclusion, the County has the option to purchase the solar panel systems from SolarCity. In addition, the Contracts define the terms for the location of the panels, set-up requirements for the panels (tilt, azimuth, etc.), price per kilowatt hour (kWh) per year, expected first year and every five year production as well as having a SolarGuard readable meter at each site. The County pays SolarCity a set fee per kWh for the use of the panels (with a 2% annual accelerator increase) and the County receives credits per kWh from National Grid for the energy collected by the panels.
    [Show full text]
  • Solarpro 3.6, October & November, 2010
    October/November 2010 PV Monitoring Granularity | Surge Protection ® Optimal Design, Installation & Performance solarprofessional.com Central Inverter Trends in Power Plant Applications Operations Management Optimize Personnel, Resources & Processes Interview: John Berdner SolarEdge Changing the US PV Industry…Again Array Voltage Considerations Best Practices for Source Circuits 2010 Inverter Specifications SUBSCRIBE Comprehensive Data for FOR FREE Sixty 3-Phase Products BOOTH 1222 SolarCity Intel Folsom Campus ...or anytime at Folsom, CA f solarprofessional.com Actions speak louder than words Visit us at Solar Power International 2010 Booth 4027 The Fronius Difference At Fronius, we’re proud of our products and service, always working to ensure the highest quality standards. To that end, we want to hear from you, our customers. What are we doing right? What can we improve? We strive to return phone calls and emails in a timely fashion. We have created a paper-free, low-stress service Please take a few minutes of your time to help up put your words into action by completing a survey. process supported by knowledgeable technical support. And we stand behind our products with a standard Visit www.fronius-usa.com and click on the link to our survey. Survey participants will be entered to win 10-year warranty, expandable to 15 years. We are always working to provide an excellent customer experience. some great prizes in a monthly drawing, from March through September, and a grand prize drawing to be held Simply put, we do what we say we will and call that “The Fronius Difference.” at Solar Power International 2010 in October.
    [Show full text]
  • RE-Powering America's Land Initiative: Project Tracking Matrix April 2016
    RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: April 2016 Project Tracking Matrix The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recognizes the overall environmental RE-Powering America’s benefit of siting renewable energy projects on contaminated properties. Through Land Initiative the RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative, EPA is encouraging renewable energy development on current and formerly contaminated lands, landfills, and mine sites To provide information on renewable energy on when such development is aligned with the community’s vision for the site. contaminated land projects not currently appearing Using publically available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed in this document, email [email protected]. renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills. To date, the To receive updates, newsletters, and other RE-Powering Initiative has identified 179 renewable energy installations on 171 information about the RE-Powering program, contaminated lands, landfills, and mine sites1, with a cumulative installed capacity of click the banner below. just over 1,124 megawatts (MW) and consistent growth in total installations since the inception of the RE-Powering Initiative. Approximately 60% of these installations are Subscribe large-scale systems with a project capacity of 1 MW or more, either exporting energy EPA’s RE-Powering Listserv onto the utility grid or offsetting onsite energy demands. This document provides summary statistics of known installations and discusses emerging trends. In addition to the completed sites listed here, EPA is tracking more than 50 renewable energy projects on contaminated or disturbed properties in various stages of planning, approval, or construction. These include a 1.1-MW solar project under construction on a Meriden, CT landfill; a 2.25-MW solar project under construction on a coal ash landfill in Beloit, WI; and an 18.6-MW solar installation underway at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. PV Market IEA PVPS Programme Workshop Wednesday, September
    Tom Kimbis, Vice President, Strategy & External Affairs, SEIA Justin Baca, Senior Research Manager, SEIA Andrew Krulewitz, Solar Analyst, GTM Research March 29, 2012 © 2012 SEIA © 2012 SEIA About SEIA • Founded in 1974 • U.S. National Trade Association for Solar Energy • 1,000+ member companies from around the world • Members from across 50 states • Largest companies in the world as well as small installers • 14 official SEIA Chapters across the country • Our Mission: Build a strong solar industry to power America • Our Goal: 10 gigawatts (GW) of annual installed solar capacity in the U.S. by 2015 © 2012 SEIA Solar in America: Strong and Getting Stronger • 100,000 American workers in solar – double the number in 2009. • Employed at 5,600 companies – most of them small businesses – across all fifty states. • The fastest growing energy sector, and one of the fastest growing sectors of the U.S. economy – with 109% growth in PV installations in 2011. • More than 4,460 MW of installed solar electric capacity today across the U.S. © 2012 SEIA What the Future Holds– Looking Ahead • In 2012, we’ll see near-term challenges for the industry, especially for manufacturers • Since the beginning of 2010, 52 new U.S. solar manufacturing facilities have begun operations across America • By 2014-15, the U.S. is projected to become one of the world’s largest solar market alongside surging Chinese market. © 2012 SEIA Solar Market Insight: Year in Review 2011 • Detailed data on markets in top 23 states available in full report. • Free executive summary provides national aggregate data on installations, pricing, manufacturing and demand forecasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Companies
    Companies A1A Solar Contracting Inc. AA Solar Services LLC 0Titan Solar & Remodeling AAA 1 Solar Solutions AAA Solar 1 Stop Shop AABCO 1800 Remodel AAE Solar 1800 Solar USA Aapco 1Solar Abakus Solar USA Inc. 1st Choice Solar Abbott Electric Inc. 1st US Energy LLC ABC Leads 21st Century Doors & Windows ABC Seamless Corporate 21st Century Power Solutions ABCO Solar 2Four6 Solar ABest Energy Power 2K Solar Ablaze Energy 310 Solar LLC Able Energy 31Solar LLC Able Energy Co. 360 Solar Energy Able Heating & Cooling 360 Solar Group Able Roof Mr Roof 4 Lakes Home Restoration ABM Services & Renovations 7 Summits Roofing Absolute Solar 76 Solar Absolutely Solar 84 Lumber Abundant Air Inc 84 Lumber Company Abundant Energy 84 Lumber Company Abundant Solar A & R Solar AC Solar Inc. A Division of Mechanical Energy Systems Accelerate Solar A National Electric Service Inc. Accent Window Systems, Inc. A Plus Roofing Acceptance A Real Advantage Construction Access Geothermal A Two Z Windows & Doors Installing Access Insurance Quality A Wholesale Acclaimed Roofing of Colorado Window Company Accord Construction / Window Wise Austin A&E Mechanical Accuquote A&M Energy Solutions Accurate Architecture LLC A&R Solar ACDC Solar A.D.D. Solar Connect Acker Roofing A.I. Solar ACME Environmental A.M. Solar ACME International Services Inc. A-1 Electric Acordia A1 Energy LLC Acquisition Technologies A1 Plumbing Acro Energy A1 Solar LLC Active Energies A1 Solar Power Active Energies Inc. A-1 Windows & Doors, Inc. Active Energies Solar A-1 Windows & Doors, Inc. A-1 Windows & Active Solar Doors, Inc. Folkers Window Company PGT Addin Solar Industries Addison Homes LLC A1A Solar Addy Electric Adobe Reo Affordable Windows and Doors of Tampa Adobe Solar Bay ADT LLC AffordaSolar, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Construction Development
    Major Solar Projects in the United States Operating, Under Construction, or Under Development Updated March 7, 2016 Overview This list is for informational purposes only, reflecting projects and completed milestones in the public domain. The information in this list was gathered from public announcements of solar projects in the form of company press releases, news releases, and, in some cases, conversations with individual developers. It is not a comprehensive list of all major solar projects under development. This list may be missing smaller projects that are not publicly announced. Particularly, many smaller projects located outside of California that are built on a short time-scale may be underrepresented on this list. Also, SEIA does not guarantee that every identified project will be built. Like any other industry, market conditions may impact project economics and timelines. SEIA will remove a project if it is publicly announced that it has been cancelled. SEIA actively promotes public policy that minimizes regulatory uncertainty and encourages the accelerated deployment of utility-scale solar power. This list includes ground-mounted solar power plants 1 MW and larger. Example Projects Nevada Solar One Sierra SunTower Nellis Air Force Base DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center Developer: Acciona Developer: eSolar Developer: MMA Renewable Ventures Developer: Florida Power & Light Co. Electricity Purchaser: NV Energy Electricity Purchaser: Southern Electricity Purchaser: Nellis AFB Electricity Purchaser: Florida Power & California
    [Show full text]