Titanium in Phengite: a Geobarometer for High Temperature Eclogites
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Impact of High Temperatures on Aluminoceladonite Studied by Mössbauer, Raman, X-Ray Diffraction and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Title: Impact of high temperatures on aluminoceladonite studied by Mössbauer, Raman, X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy Author: Mariola Kądziołka-Gaweł, Maria Czaja, Mateusz Dulski, Tomasz Krzykawski, Magdalena Szubka Citation style: Kądziołka-Gaweł Mariola, Czaja Maria, Dulski Mateusz, Krzykawski Tomasz, Szubka Magdalena. (2021). Impact of high temperatures on aluminoceladonite studied by Mössbauer, Raman, X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. “Mineralogy and Petrology” (Vol. 115, iss. 0, 2021, s. 1- 14), DOI: 10.1007/s00710-021-00753-z Mineralogy and Petrology (2021) 115:431–444 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-021-00753-z ORIGINAL PAPER Impact of high temperatures on aluminoceladonite studied by Mössbauer, Raman, X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy Mariola Kądziołka-Gaweł1 & Maria Czaja2 & Mateusz Dulski3,4 & Tomasz Krzykawski2 & Magdalena Szubka1 Received: 9 March 2020 /Accepted: 28 April 2021 / Published online: 18 May 2021 # The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Mössbauer, Raman, X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies were used to examine the effects of temperature on the structure of two aluminoceladonite samples. The process of oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+ ions started at about 350 °C for the sample richer in Al and at 300 °C for the sample somewhat lower Al-content. Mössbauer results show that this process may be associated with dehydroxylation or even initiate it. The first stage of dehydroxylation takes place at a temperature > 350 °C when the adjacent OH groups are replaced with a single residual oxygen atom. Up to ~500 °C, Fe ions do not migrate from cis- octahedra to trans-octahedra sites, but the coordination number of polyhedra changes from six to five. -
Mineral Processing
Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19 -
Factors Responsible for Crystal Chemical Variations in The
American Mineralogist, Volume 95, pages 348–361, 2010 Factors responsible for crystal-chemical variations in the solid solutions from illite to aluminoceladonite and from glauconite to celadonite VICTOR A. DRITS ,1 BELL A B. ZV I A GIN A ,1 DOUGL A S K. MCCA RTY,2,* A N D ALFRE D L. SA LYN 1 1Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, Pyzhevsky per. 7, 119017 Moscow, Russia 2Chevron ETC, 3901 Briarpark, Houston, Texas 77063, U.S.A. AB STR A CT Several finely dispersed low-temperature dioctahedral micas and micaceous minerals that form solid solutions from (Mg,Fe)-free illite to aluminoceladonite via Mg-rich illite, and from Fe3+-rich glauconite to celadonite have been studied by X-ray diffraction and chemical analysis. The samples have 1M and 1Md structures. The transitions from illite to aluminoceladonite and from glauconite to celadonite are accompanied by a consistent decrease in the mica structural-unit thickness (2:1 layer + interlayer) or csinβ. In the first sample series csinβ decreases from 10.024 to 9.898 Å, and in the second from 10.002 to 9.961 Å. To reveal the basic factors responsible for these regularities, struc- tural modeling was carried out to deduce atomic coordinates for 1M dioctahedral mica based on the unit-cell parameters and cation composition. For each sample series, the relationships among csinβ, maximum and mean thicknesses of octahedral and tetrahedral sheets and of the 2:1 layer, interlayer distance, and variations of the tetrahedral rotation angle, α, and the degree of basal surface corruga- tion, ∆Z, have been analyzed in detail. -
List of Abbreviations
List of Abbreviations Ab albite Cbz chabazite Fa fayalite Acm acmite Cc chalcocite Fac ferroactinolite Act actinolite Ccl chrysocolla Fcp ferrocarpholite Adr andradite Ccn cancrinite Fed ferroedenite Agt aegirine-augite Ccp chalcopyrite Flt fluorite Ak akermanite Cel celadonite Fo forsterite Alm almandine Cen clinoenstatite Fpa ferropargasite Aln allanite Cfs clinoferrosilite Fs ferrosilite ( ortho) Als aluminosilicate Chl chlorite Fst fassite Am amphibole Chn chondrodite Fts ferrotscher- An anorthite Chr chromite makite And andalusite Chu clinohumite Gbs gibbsite Anh anhydrite Cld chloritoid Ged gedrite Ank ankerite Cls celestite Gh gehlenite Anl analcite Cp carpholite Gln glaucophane Ann annite Cpx Ca clinopyroxene Glt glauconite Ant anatase Crd cordierite Gn galena Ap apatite ern carnegieite Gp gypsum Apo apophyllite Crn corundum Gr graphite Apy arsenopyrite Crs cristroballite Grs grossular Arf arfvedsonite Cs coesite Grt garnet Arg aragonite Cst cassiterite Gru grunerite Atg antigorite Ctl chrysotile Gt goethite Ath anthophyllite Cum cummingtonite Hbl hornblende Aug augite Cv covellite He hercynite Ax axinite Czo clinozoisite Hd hedenbergite Bhm boehmite Dg diginite Hem hematite Bn bornite Di diopside Hl halite Brc brucite Dia diamond Hs hastingsite Brk brookite Dol dolomite Hu humite Brl beryl Drv dravite Hul heulandite Brt barite Dsp diaspore Hyn haiiyne Bst bustamite Eck eckermannite Ill illite Bt biotite Ed edenite Ilm ilmenite Cal calcite Elb elbaite Jd jadeite Cam Ca clinoamphi- En enstatite ( ortho) Jh johannsenite bole Ep epidote -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,367,760 B1 Wang Et Al
US008367760B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,367,760 B1 Wang et al. (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 5, 2013 (54) NON-BLACK RUBBER MEMBRANES 3,842,111 A 10/1974 Meyer-Simon et al. 3,873,489 A 3, 1975 Thurn et al. 3,978, 103 A 8/1976 Meyer-Simon et al. (75) Inventors: Hao Wang, Copley, OH (US); James A. 3,997,581 A 12/1976 Petka et al. Davis, Westfield, IN (US); William F. 4,002,594 A 1/1977 Fetterman Barham, Jr., Prescott, AR (US) 5,093,206 A 3, 1992 Schoenbeck 5,468,550 A 11/1995 Davis et al. (73) Assignee: Firestone Building Products Company, 5,580,919 A 12/1996 Agostini et al. LLC, Indianapolis, IN (US) 5,583,245 A 12/1996 Parker et al. 5,663,396 A 9, 1997 Musleve et al. 5,674,932 A 10/1997 Agostini et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,684, 171 A 11/1997 Wideman et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,684, 172 A 11/1997 Wideman et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 207 days. 5,696, 197 A 12/1997 Smith et al. 5,700,538 A 12/1997 Davis et al. 5,703,154 A 12/1997 Davis et al. (21) Appl. No.: 12/389,145 5,804,661 A 9, 1998 Davis et al. 5,854,327 A * 12/1998 Davis et al. ................... 524,445 (22) Filed: Feb. 19, 2009 6,579,949 B1 6/2003 Hergenrother et al. -
Glossary of Obsolete Mineral Names
L.120 = clay, Robertson 22 (1954). laavenite = låvenite, Dana 6th, 375 (1892). labite = palygorskite, AM 22, 811 (1937). laboentsowiet = labuntsovite-Mn, Council for Geoscience 765 (1996). laboita = vesuvianite, de Fourestier 191 (1999). laboundsovite = labuntsovite-Mn, Kipfer 181 (1974). labountsovite = labuntsovite-Mn, MM 35, 1141 (1966). Labrador (Frankenheim) = meionite, Egleston 118 (1892). labrador (Rose) = Na-rich anorthite, MM 20, 354 (1925). Labrador-Bytownit = Na-rich anorthite, Hintze II, 1513 (1896). labradore-stone = Na-rich anorthite, Kipfer 181 (1974). Labrador feldspar = Na-rich anorthite, Dana 6th, 334 (1892). Labrador-Feldspat = Na-rich anorthite, Kipfer 107 (1974). Labrador-Feldspath = Na-rich anorthite, Clark 383 (1993). labrador-felspar = Na-rich anorthite, Clark 383 (1993). Labrador hornblende = Fe-rich enstatite or Mg-rich ferrosilite, AM 63, 1051 (1978). labradorische Hornblende = Fe-rich enstatite or Mg-rich ferrosilite, Dana 6th, 348 (1892). Labradoriserende Feltspat = Na-rich anorthite, Zirlin 71 (1981). labradorite (intermediate) = Na-rich anorthite, Dana 6th, 334 (1892). labradorite-felsite = Na-rich anorthite, Dana 6th, 334 (1892). labradorite-moonstone = gem Na-rich anorthite, Schumann 164 (1977). Labradorit-Mondstein = gem Na-rich anorthite, Chudoba EIV, 48 (1974). labradorkő = Na-rich anorthite, László 155 (1995). labrador moonstone = gem Na-rich anorthite, Read 131 (1988). Labrador oder schillerenden rauten förmigen Feldspath = chrysotile ± lizardite or talc or anthophyllite, Clark 620 (1993). labrador schiller spar = Fe-rich enstatite or Mg-rich ferrosilite, Egleston 162 (1892). labrador spar = gem Na-rich anorthite, Read 131 (1988). Labradorstein = Na-rich anorthite, Dana 6th, 334 (1892). labrador stone = Na-rich anorthite, Chester 149 (1896). labradownite = Na-rich anorthite, Kipfer 181 (1974). labratownite = Na-rich anorthite, AM 11, 138 (1926). -
Synthetic Hypersilicic Cl-Bearing Mica in the Phlogopite-Celadonite
American Mineralogist, Volume 93, pages 1429-1436, 2008 Synthetic hypersilicic Cl-bearing mica in the phlogopite-celadonite join: A multimethodical characterization of the missing link between di- and tri-octahedral micas at high pressures SABRINA NAZZARENI,!'* PAOLA COMODI,! LUCA BINDI,2 OLEG G. SAFONOV,3 YURIY A. LITVIN,3 AND LEONID L. PERCHUK3,4 'Department of Earth Sciences, University ofPerugia, Perugia, Italy 'Museo di Storia Naturale, Sezione di Mineralogia, Universita di Firenze, Via La Pira 4, 1-50121, Firenze, Italy 3Institute of Experimental Mineralogy, Chemogolovka, Moscow, Russia "Department of Petrology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia ABSTRACT A hypersilicic Cl-bearing mica was synthesized at 4 GPa and 1200-1250 °C, close to the solidus of the join diopside-jadeite-KCl, in association with diopside-jadeite pyroxene, K-rich alumino silicate glass and/or sanidine and (K,Na)Cl. The mica shows a negative correlation between tetrahedral Si and octahedral (AI + Mg), suggesting an Al-celadonitic substitution (Si + VIAl+ VIO = IVAI+ VIMg) and a chemical formula: Kl01(Mg245AlolDo35h~lSi352Alo48h~401O[(OH,0)166Clo34)h~2' The presence of hydroxyl was confirmed by OH stretching modes at 3734 and 3606 cm' in the Raman spectra. Single- crystal X-ray diffraction data provide the unit-cell parameters (space group C2/m, 1M polytype): a = 5.299(4), b = 9.167(3), C = 10.226(3) A, ~ =100.06(4)°, V= 489.1(4) N. The structure refinement shows the presence of vacancies on the octahedral sites (15% for Ml and 6.5% for M2). Chlorine occupies a position about 0.5 A from 04 with partial occupancy (0.39 apfu). -
CHAPTER 4 - MINERAL CHEMISTRY and METAMORPHIC CONDITIONS A
- 217 - CHAPTER 4 - MINERAL CHEMISTRY AND METAMORPHIC CONDITIONS a - 218 - Mineral chemistry and metamorphic conditions The aims of this chapter are to present mineral chemical data, to describe the mineral chemistry in relation to parageneses in selected lithologies (with particular reference to high-pressure metamorphic types) and to evaluate the metamorphic conditions under which these parageneses formed in the light of published experimentally and theoretically derived phase equilibria. Finally, a synthesis of pressure-temperature-time (P-T-t) relationships will be presented. Analytical methods and mineral recalculation schemes are described in Appendices 1 and 2. Results of geothermometry calculations are sumarised in Tbj 4.20. SECTION 4.01 The Eclogites 4.01.1 Summary of petrography Detailed petrographic descriptions appear in Chapter 2, the salient features of which are summarised here. The most common parageneses in the eclogites are:- garnet + omphacite +1- amphibole +1- rutile garnet + omphacite + phengite +1- quartz +1- rutile garnet + omphacite + phengite + zoisite +/_ quartz +/_ rut i e. S - 219 - garnet + omphacite + phengite + zoisite + kyanite +1- quartz ^1- rutile Segregations of zoisite + kyanite + quartz occur in some more aluminous types. Occasionally, Na-poor rocks have pale green or blue-green amphibole in textural equilibrium with omphacite and garnet (figure 2.18) which may become an essential or dominant phase, to give:- garnet + amphibole + clinopyroxene +/_ rutile. The phases listed above will be referred to as 'matrix' phases. Solid inclusions are common in the matrix phases (figures 2.19, 2.45). They are not associated with fractures in the garnets and commonly occur in samples where no alteration of garnet rims or matrix grains has occurred. -
Genesis and Solvus Relations of Submicroscopically Intergrown
Contrib Mineral Petrol (1991) 106:367-378 Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology Springer-Verlag 1991 Genesis and solvus relations of submieroseopieally intergrown paragonite and phengite in a blueschist from northern California* Yen-Hong Shau, Melanie E. Feather**, Eric J. Essene, and Donald R. Peacor Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Received February 12, 1990/Accepted July 13, 1990 Abstract. Electron microbeam techniques have been used Introduction to examine submicroscopically intergrown paragonite, phengite and chlorite from the South Fork Mountain Coexisting paragonite and muscovite (or phengite) have Schist of the Franciscan Terrane of northern California, been analyzed in prograde metamorphic assemblages in which was subjected to blueschist facies metamorphism. the anchizone to epizone (Frey 1970, 1978; Livi et al. The sample also contains quartz, albite, lawsonite, and 1988), in the pnmpellyite facies (including prehnite-pum- rutile. The subassemblage albite-lawsonite-rutile re- pellyite and pumpellyite-actinolite facies, term from Es- quires metamorphic conditions on the low-temperature sene 1989; occurrences from Kramm 1980; Merriman side of the equilibrium albite + lawsonite + futile = para- and Roberts 1985; Pc-Piper 1985), the albite-epidote gonite+sphene+quartz+H20 (T<200 ~ and P< hornfels facies (Okuyama-Kusunose 1985), the green- 7.4 kbars based on thermodynamic data of Holland and schist facies (H6ck 1974; Katagas and Baltatzis 1980; Powell 1990). The white micas appear to be optically Ashworth and Evirgen 1984; Baltatzis and Sideris 1985), homogeneous, but back-scattered electron images can the amphibolite facies (Burnham and Radoslovich 1964; distinguish two different micas by their slight difference Zen and Albee 1964; Henley 1970; Baltatzis and Wood in contrast. -
MUSCOVITE Which Grades Into “Sericite” at Depth (Klein, 1939)
1939). 4. Arcadian mine (Klein, 1939). 5. Kearsarge lode: Generally found with “adularia,” MUSCOVITE which grades into “sericite” at depth (Klein, 1939). KAl2AlSi3O10(OH)2 6. Wolverine mine, Kearsarge: Variety “sericite” A widespread and abundant mica. It occurs in (Morris, 1983). 7. Quincy mine: Dark green, igneous rocks (granites and granitic pegmatites), waxy, barrel-shaped pseudohexagonal crystals up metamorphic rocks (slates, phyllites, mica schists, to 1 cm (pseudomorphous after chlorite?) occurred and micaceous gneisses), sediments and in a large pocket of calcite crystals associated with sedimentary rocks (chiefly sands and some native copper on the 7th level, approximately 100 sandstones), wall rocks of various ore deposits, and meters NE from the Number 2 Shaft. as a replacement of various primary silicates Iron County: Iron River district: As the 2M1 (plagioclase, andalusite, etc.) as the variety type in oxidized iron formation (Bailey and Tyler, “sericite.” 1960). Muscovite is widespread in the Portage Lake Keweenaw County: 1. Central mine: “Sericite” Volcanics of the Keweenaw (often referred to as forms tan, velvety coatings on calcite. 2. “sericite”) in a variety of parageneses (Livnat, Northeast of Gay: In Jacobsville Sandstone in 1983). While the varietal name “sericite” has been section 16, T56N, R30W; contains 1.5 to 4% used for any fine-grained muscovite, it is best Cr2O3 and ~1% V2O3 (L. L. Babcock, personal applied to secondary fine-grained muscovite that communication). 3. Dan’s Point, section 27, has replaced other pre-existing silicates by low- T59N, R27W: A very fine-grained vanadian temperature potassium metasomatism. “Phengite” muscovite occurs with calcite in veinlets less than 1 defines a series of potassium micas with mm thick on the faces of bleached joints in a silty compositions intermediate between muscovite and Keweenawan sandstone. -
Nomenclature of the Micas
Mineralogical Magazine, April 1999, Vol. 63(2), pp. 267-279 Nomenclature of the micas M. RIEDER (CHAIRMAN) Department of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Mineral Resources, Charles University, Albertov 6, 12843 Praha 2, Czech Republic G. CAVAZZINI Dipartimento di Mineralogia e Petrologia, Universith di Padova, Corso Garibaldi, 37, 1-35122 Padova, Italy Yu. S. D'YAKONOV VSEGEI, Srednii pr., 74, 199 026 Sankt-Peterburg, Russia W. m. FRANK-KAMENETSKII* G. GOTTARDIt S. GUGGENHEIM Department of Geological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60607-7059, USA P. V. KOVAL' Institut geokhimii SO AN Rossii, ul. Favorskogo la, Irkutsk - 33, Russia 664 033 G. MOLLER Institut fiir Mineralogie und Mineralische Rohstoffe, Technische Universit/it Clausthal, Postfach 1253, D-38670 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany A. M, R. NEIVA Departamento de Ci6ncias da Terra, Universidade de Coimbra, Apartado 3014, 3049 Coimbra CODEX, Portugal E. W. RADOSLOVICH$ J.-L. ROBERT Centre de Recherche sur la Synth6se et la Chimie des Min6raux, C.N.R.S., 1A, Rue de la F6rollerie, 45071 Od6ans CEDEX 2, France F. P. SASSI Dipartimento di Mineralogia e Petrologia, Universit~t di Padova, Corso Garibaldi, 37, 1-35122 Padova, Italy H. TAKEDA Chiba Institute of Technology, 2-17-1 Tsudanuma, Narashino City, Chiba 275, Japan Z. WEISS Central Analytical Laboratory, Technical University of Mining and Metallurgy, T/'. 17.1istopadu, 708 33 Ostrava- Poruba, Czech Republic AND D. R. WONESw * Russia; died 1994 t Italy; died 1988 * Australia; resigned 1986 wUSA; died 1984 1999 The Mineralogical Society M. RIEDER ETAL. ABSTRACT I I End-members and species defined with permissible ranges of composition are presented for the true micas, the brittle micas, and the interlayer-deficient micas. -
Distinguishing Features and Identification Criteria for K
minerals Article Distinguishing Features and Identification Criteria for K-Dioctahedral 1M Micas (Illite-Aluminoceladonite and Illite-Glauconite-Celadonite Series) from Middle-Infrared Spectroscopy Data Bella B. Zviagina 1, Victor A. Drits 1 and Olga V. Dorzhieva 2,* 1 Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Science (GIN RAS), 7 Pyzhevsky per., 119017 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (B.B.Z.); [email protected] (V.A.D.) 2 Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Science (IGEM RAS), 119017 Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 December 2019; Accepted: 5 February 2020; Published: 11 February 2020 Abstract: A representative collection of K-dioctahedral 1M micas ranging in composition from (Mg, Fe)-poor illites to aluminoceladonites through Mg-rich illites (Fe-poor varieties) and from Fe-bearing, Mg-rich illites to celadonites through Fe-illites, Al-glauconites and glauconites (Fe-bearing varieties) was studied by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in the middle-infrared region. Analysis and comparison of the relationships between the band positions and cation compositions of Fe-poor and Fe-bearing K-dioctahedral micas provided a generalized set of FTIR identification criteria that include the band positions and profiles in the regions of Si–O bending, Si–O stretching, and OH-stretching vibrations. FTIR data allow unambiguous identification of illites, aluminoceladonites, and celadonites, as well as distinction between Fe-illites and illites proper, as well as between Al-glauconites and glauconites. Specifically, a sharp maximum from the AlOHMg stretching vibration 1 1 at ~3600 cm− , the presence of a MgOHMg stretching vibration at 3583–3585 cm− , as well as 1 characteristic band positions in the Si–O bending (435–439, 468–472 and 509–520 cm− ) and stretching 1 regions (985–1012 and 1090–1112 cm− ) are clearly indicative of aluminoceladonite.