DOCSLIB.ORG

Office of Native Hawaiian Relations U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Office of Native Hawaiian Relations U.S U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Native Hawaiian Organization Notification List Maintained by the Office of Native Hawaiian Relations U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Native Hawaiian Relations www.doi.gov/hawaiian Native Hawaiian Organization (NHO) Notification List Table of Contents ‘Aha Kāne ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Aha Kukaniloko Koa Mana mea ola kanaka mauli ........................................................................ 1 Aha Moku O Kahikinui .................................................................................................................. 2 Aha Moku o Kaupō ......................................................................................................................... 2 Aha Moku o Maui Inc. .................................................................................................................... 3 Aha Wahine .................................................................................................................................... 3 ‘Ahahui Siwila Hawai‘i O Kapōlei ................................................................................................. 4 Ahonui Homestead Association ...................................................................................................... 4 Ahupua‘a o Moloka‘i ...................................................................................................................... 5 Ala Kahakai Trail Association ........................................................................................................ 5 Aloha First ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Association of Hawaiian Civic Clubs ............................................................................................. 6 Association of Hawaiians for Homestead Lands ............................................................................ 7 Au Puni O Hawaii ........................................................................................................................... 7 Brian Kaniela Nae‘ole Naauao ....................................................................................................... 8 Charles Pelenui Mahi Ohana .......................................................................................................... 8 Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement ................................................................................... 9 EAO Hawaii Inc. ............................................................................................................................. 9 Friends of ‘Iolani Palace ............................................................................................................... 10 George K. Cypher ‘Ohana ............................................................................................................ 10 God’s Country Waimanalo ........................................................................................................... 11 Hau‘ouiwi Homestead Association on Lāna‘i .............................................................................. 11 Hawaiian Civic Club of Wahiawa ................................................................................................ 12 Hawaiian Community Assets, Inc................................................................................................. 12 Hawaiian Kingdom Task Force .................................................................................................... 13 Ho Ohana ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Ho‘okano Family Land Trust ........................................................................................................ 14 Hui Huliau Inc............................................................................................................................... 14 Hui Kaleleiki Ohana ..................................................................................................................... 15 Hui Mālama Ola Nā ‘Ōiwi ............................................................................................................ 15 Hui O Wa‘a Kaulua ...................................................................................................................... 16 Imua Hawaii .................................................................................................................................. 16 Updated: September 23, 2020 U.S. Department of the Interior – Office of Native Hawaiian Relations Native Hawaiian Organization (NHO) Notification List Independent District of Puna ........................................................................................................ 17 Institute for Native Pacific Education and Culture ....................................................................... 17 Kaha I Ka Panoa Kaleponi Hawaiian Civic Club ......................................................................... 18 Kāko‘o ‘Ōiwi ................................................................................................................................ 18 Kalaeloa Heritage and Legacy Foundation ................................................................................... 19 Kalama‘ula Homesteaders Association ........................................................................................ 19 Kalihi Palama Hawaiian Civic Club ............................................................................................. 20 Kamealoha .................................................................................................................................... 20 Kamehameha Schools - Community Relations and Communications Group, Government Relations ....................................................................................................................................... 21 Kamiloloa One Ali‘i Homestead Association ............................................................................... 21 Kanu o ka ‘Āina Learning ‘Ohana ................................................................................................ 22 Kapolei Community Development Corporation ........................................................................... 22 Kauwahi ‘Anaina Hawai‘i Hawaiian Civic Club .......................................................................... 23 Kawaihapai Ohana ........................................................................................................................ 23 Ke One O Kakuhihewa ................................................................................................................. 24 Keaukaha Community Association............................................................................................... 24 Kingdom of Hawai‘i ..................................................................................................................... 25 Koa Ike .......................................................................................................................................... 25 Ko‘olau Foundation ...................................................................................................................... 26 Ko‘olaupoko Hawaiian Civic Club ............................................................................................... 26 Kula no na Po‘e Hawaii ................................................................................................................ 27 Kuloloi‘a Lineage - I ke Kai ‘o Kuloloi‘a .................................................................................... 27 Kupeke Ahupua‘a ......................................................................................................................... 28 Lahui Kaka‘ikahi .......................................................................................................................... 28 La‘i‘Ōpua 2020 ............................................................................................................................. 29 Ma‘a ‘Ohana c/o Lani Ma‘a Lapilio ............................................................................................. 29 Machado-Akana-Aona-Namakaeha Ohana .................................................................................. 30 Mahamoku Ohana Council ........................................................................................................... 30 Mahu Ohana .................................................................................................................................. 31 Mainland Council Association of Hawaiian Civic Clubs ............................................................. 31 Makaha Hawaiian Civic Club ....................................................................................................... 32 Maku‘u Farmers Association ........................................................................................................ 32 ii Updated: September 23, 2020 U.S. Department of the Interior – Office of Native Hawaiian Relations Native Hawaiian Organization (NHO) Notification List Malu‘ōhai Residents Association ................................................................................................. 33 Mana Health Services, Inc. ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analyzing the Obama Administration's Efforts of Reconciliation with Native
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 22 2017 Legacy in Paradise: Analyzing the Obama Administration’s Efforts of Reconciliation with Native Hawaiians Troy J.H. Andrade William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Troy J. Andrade, Legacy in Paradise: Analyzing the Obama Administration’s Efforts of Reconciliation with Native Hawaiians, 22 MICH. J. RACE & L. 273 (2017). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol22/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEGACY IN PARADISE: ANALYZING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S EFFORTS OF RECONCILIATION WITH NATIVE HAWAIIANS Troy J.H. Andrade* This Article analyzes President Barack Obama’s legacy for an indigenous people—nearly 125 years in the making—and how that legacy is now in consid- erable jeopardy with the election of Donald J. Trump. This Article is the first to specifically critique the hallmark of Obama’s reconciliatory legacy for Native Hawaiians: an administrative rule that establishes a process in which the United States would reestablish a government-to-government relationship with Native Hawaiians, the only indigenous people in America without a path toward federal recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • Palauea, Honua'ula, Maui
    OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS RESEARCH DIVISION Palauea Palauea, Honua‘ula, Maui By Holly K. Coleman Palauea is the name of an ahupua‘a (land division) in the moku (district) of Honua‘ula on the island of Maui. Many believe that Palauea and surrounding areas were focal points and ceremonial centers of the fishing communities of Honua‘ula (Six, 2013). Today, a high concentration of archaeological and cultural sites can be found in the Pa- lauea Cultural Preserve, which is one of the few undevel- oped land parcels in an area surrounded by luxury resi- dences and resorts. At least fourteen native plant species, including what is believed to be the largest natural stand of maiapilo (Capparis sandwichiana), and at least thirteen archaeological complexes have been identified within the preserve area (Donham, 2007). In April 2013, the Dowling Corporation formally con- veyed the Palauea Cultural Preserve to the Office of Ha- waiian Affairs (OHA). Palauea remains a vital cultural and historical resource for Native Hawaiians and the broader community. The goal of this Information Sheet is to explore some of the cultural and historical narratives of Palauea and the surrounding areas, particularly as OHA transitions into the role of care- taker of this place. This Information Sheet will also strengthen the agency’s foundation of knowledge for this wahi pana (storied, legendary place). Left: View of Molokini and Kaho‘olawe from Palauea Heiau. Source: Shane Tegarden Photography for OHA, 2013. Research Division Land, Culture, and History Section Information Sheet, October 2013 Office of Hawaiian Affairs 560 N. Nimitz Hwy, Suite 200, Honolulu, HI 96817 www.oha.org 1 OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS RESEARCH DIVISION Traditional Land Divisions Winds and Rains of Honua‘ula Honua‘ula was known as a dry land; indeed, Honua‘ula means “red land or earth” and may have also been the named for a variety of sweet potato grown in the area as a staple food (Pukui & Elbert, 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiian Language Normalization: an Analysis of L2 Hawaiian Speaker Narratives
    HAWAIIAN LANGUAGE NORMALIZATION: AN ANALYSIS OF L2 HAWAIIAN SPEAKER NARRATIVES KAPUAOKEKOʻOLAUIKAULUPUA ANGELINE LEIKO ADAMS University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa ABSTRACT This study analyzes the degree to which the Hawaiian language has become normalized in a range of domains beyond language learning contexts for L2 Hawaiian speakers. First, two in- depth interviews were conducted with two graduate students in the Hawaiʻinuiākea School of Hawaiian Knowledge at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (UHM). The interviews were then analyzed using narrative analysis and were organized thematically according to where students report that they use Hawaiian language in and outside of the UHM campus. The narrative data were then used to create a questionnaire to survey 32 students who are self- identified proficient speakers of Hawaiian at UHM about where they use Hawaiian and for what purpose they use Hawaiian in different places and spaces in their lives. The data provide more insight into language normalization by showing where L2 Hawaiian speakers are using Hawaiian in their lives. The findings also provide valuable implications for the ongoing revitalization of ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi and give a clearer picture of L2 language use. INTRODUCTION “E ola mau ka ʻōlelo Hawaiʻi” is a Hawaiian proverb or ʻōlelo noʻeau that translates to “the Hawaiian language lives on” (Pukui, 1983). This ʻōlelo noʻeau has been a sort of slogan for the revitalization efforts of the Hawaiian language. It is one of the most popular sayings among second language learners and speakers about their mission to kōkua or help the Hawaiian language grow stronger. Learning the Hawaiian language is challenging since there are not many native speakers of the language.
    [Show full text]
  • NPRM Part 50 9.29.15.Pdf
    4334-63 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Office of the Secretary 43 CFR Part 50 Docket No. DOI-2015-0005 145D0102DM DS6CS00000 DLSN00000.000000 DX.6CS25 241A0 RIN 1090-AB05 Procedures for Reestablishing a Formal Government-to-Government Relationship with the Native Hawaiian Community AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of the Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) is proposing an administrative rule to facilitate the reestablishment of a formal government-to-government relationship with the Native Hawaiian community to more effectively implement the special political and trust relationship that Congress has established between that community and the United States. The proposed rule does not attempt to reorganize a Native Hawaiian government or draft its constitution, nor does it dictate the form or structure of that government. Rather, the proposed rule would establish an administrative procedure and criteria that the Secretary would use if the Native Hawaiian community forms a unified government that then seeks a formal government-to-government relationship with the United States. Consistent with the Federal policy of indigenous self- determination and Native self-governance, the Native Hawaiian community itself would determine whether and how to reorganize its government. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 90 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Please see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for dates and locations of public meetings and tribal consultations. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the methods listed below. Please use Regulation Identifier Number 1090-AB05 in your message. 1. Federal eRulemaking portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Hereby Halt the Proposed
    No. __-___ In the Supreme Court of the United States ____________________________________________________ KELI’I AKIN, KEALII MAKEKAU, JOSEPH KENT, YOSHIMASA SEAN MITSUI, PEDRO KANA’E GAPERO, and MELISSA LEINA’ALA MONIZ, Applicants, v. THE STATE OF HAWAII, GOVERNOR DAVID Y. IGE, ROBERT K. LINDSEY JR., Chairperson, Board of Trustees, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, COLETTE Y. MACHADO, PETER APO, HAUNANI APOLIONA, ROWENA M.N. AKANA, JOHN D. WAIHE’E IV, CARMEN HULU LINDSEY, DAN AHUNA, LEINA’ALA AHU ISA, Trustees, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, KAMANA’OPONO CRABBE, Chief Exec. Officer, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, JOHN D. WAIHE’E III, Chairman, Native Hawaiian Roll Commission, NA’ALEHU ANTHONY, LEI KIHOI, ROBIN DANNER, MAHEALANI WENDT, Commissioners, Native Hawaiian Roll Commission, CLYDE W. NAMU’O, Exec. Director, Native Hawaiian Roll Commission, THE AKAMAI FOUNDATION, and THE NA’I AUPUNI FOUNDATION, Respondents. ______________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX ___________________________________________________________________________ Michael A. Lilly Robert D. Popper, Counsel of Record NING LILLY & JONES JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. 707 Richards Street, Suite 700 425 Third Street, SW Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Washington, DC 20024 (808) 528-1100 (202) 646-5172 [email protected] [email protected] H. Christopher Coates William S. Consovoy LAW OFFICES OF H. CHRISTOPHER COATES J. Michael Connolly 934 Compass Point CONSOVOY MCCARTHY PARK PLLC Charleston, South Carolina 29412 3033 Wilson Boulevard (843) 609-7080 Arlington, Virginia 22201 [email protected] (703) 243-9423 www.consovoymccarthy.com Dated: November 23, 2015 Attorneys for Applicants Case 1:15-cv-00322-JMS-BMK Document 122 Filed 11/19/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1667 FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2015 MOLLY CC.
    [Show full text]
  • Kapa'a, Waipouli, Olohena, Wailua and Hanamā'ulu Island of Kaua'i
    CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE KAPA‘A RELIEF ROUTE; KAPA‘A, WAIPOULI, OLOHENA, WAILUA AND HANAMĀ‘ULU ISLAND OF KAUA‘I by K. W. Bushnell, B.A. David Shideler, M.A. and Hallett H. Hammatt, PhD. Prepared for Kimura International by Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i, Inc. May 2004 Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i wishes to acknowledge, first and foremost, the kūpuna who willingly took the time to be interviewed and graciously shared their mana‘o: Raymond Aiu, Valentine Ako, George Hiyane, Kehaulani Kekua, Beverly Muraoka, Alice Paik, and Walter (Freckles) Smith Jr. Special thanks also go to several individuals who shared information for the completion of this report including Randy Wichman, Isaac Kaiu, Kemamo Hookano, Aletha Kaohi, LaFrance Kapaka-Arboleda, Sabra Kauka, Linda Moriarty, George Mukai, Jo Prigge, Healani Trembath, Martha Yent, Jiro Yukimura, Joanne Yukimura, and Taka Sokei. Interviews were conducted by Tina Bushnell. Background research was carried out by Tina Bushnell, Dr. Vicki Creed and David Shideler. Acknowledgements also go to Mary Requilman of the Kaua‘i Historical Society and the Bishop Museum Archives staff who were helpful in navigating their respective collections for maps and photographs. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of Work............................................................................................................ 1 B. Methods......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Successes and Problems of the Hawaiian Language Revitalization Movement Anna Greiner-Shelton Eastern Washington University
    Eastern Washington University EWU Digital Commons EWU Student Research and Creative Works 2014 Symposium Symposium 2014 Successes and Problems of the Hawaiian Language Revitalization Movement Anna Greiner-Shelton Eastern Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.ewu.edu/srcw_2014 Part of the Linguistic Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Greiner-Shelton, Anna, "Successes and Problems of the Hawaiian Language Revitalization Movement" (2014). 2014 Symposium. 47. https://dc.ewu.edu/srcw_2014/47 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the EWU Student Research and Creative Works Symposium at EWU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2014 Symposium by an authorized administrator of EWU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Successes & Problems Of the Hawaiian Language Revitalization Movement Anna Greiner-Shelton Factors in the Decline of the Hawaiian Language • The massive reduction of native Hawaiians due to contact with Western diseases • In 1778, the native Hawaiian population was estimated to be 800,000 • In 1878, only 47,500 native Hawaiians remained • 94% of the native population had been wiped out • Erosion of the major institutions of Hawaiian life • Resulted in English becoming the dominant language • The replacement of Hawaiian with English • Occurred because of Hawaiian‘s perceived low and inferior status in relation to English • In 1840, Hawaiian was the primary language used in the government • 30 years later, all official government
    [Show full text]
  • From Mauka to Makai
    FROM MAUKA TO MAKAI: THE RIVER OF JUSTICE MUST FLOW FREELY \, . REPORT ON THE RECONCILIATION PROCESS BETWEEN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND NATIVE HAWAIIANS PREPARED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OCTOBER 23, 2000 University of Hawaii School of Law Library - Jon Van Dyke Archives Collection --- FROM MAUKA TO MAKAI: THE RIVER OF JUSTICE MUST FLOW FREELY REPORT ON THE RECONCILIATION PROCESS BETWEEN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND NATIVE HAWAIIANS PREPARED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OCTOBER 23, 2000 Description of the Reconciliation Process and this Report In 1993, with Public Law 103-150, the Apology Resolution, the United States apologized to the Native Hawaiian people for the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawai' i in 1893 and expressed its commitment to acknowledge the ramifications of the overthrow in order to provide a proper foundation for reconciliation between the United States and the Native Hawaiian people. The passage of the Apology Resolution was the first step in this reconciliation process. In March of 1999, Senator Daniel K. Akaka asked Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt and Attorney General Janet Reno to designate officials to represent their respective Departments in efforts of reconciliation between the Federal Government and Native Hawaiians. Secretary Babbitt designated John Berry, Assistant Secretary, Policy Management and Budget, for the Department of the Interior (Interior), and Attorney General Reno designated Mark Van Norman, Director, Office of Tribal Justice, for the Department of Justice (Justice)(together, the Departments), to commence the reconciliation process. Messrs. Berry and Van Norman, the authors of this Report, have accepted Senator Akaka's definition of "reconciliation" as a "means for healing," and in addition believe, in words taken from one statement, "a 'reconciliation' requires something more than being nice or showing respect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hawaiian Island of Ni`Ihau, Although Technically Part of The
    Forbidden BY DAVID BURNEY, Ph.D. sland he Hawaiian Island of Ni`ihau, although technically part of the United States, is probably less known to most Americans than any other part of the country. Just under 18 miles to the southwest of the major international tourist destination of Kaua`i lies the mysterious T“Forbidden Island.” This nickname is apt, because it is the invitation-only property of the legendary Robinson family, descendants of the Scottish Sinclairs who bought the island from King Kamehameha V in 1864 for $10,000I and a baby grand piano. It is also, in a sense, the last stronghold of Hawaiian as the primary language and where Hawaiian culture has been passed down directly from the ancestors for centuries with little intervention from Western culture — except for the residents’ strong Christian faith. Owners of this island have kept the modern world at bay to a remarkable extent. In recent years the population, which almost certainly contains a higher percentage of people of nearly pure Hawaiian ancestry than any other, has been slowly decreasing — from about 200 to recently where less than 40 residents were on the island for several months at a time — as families seek employment opportunities along Kaua`i’s south shore or farther afield. The Robinson’s enterprises on the island until of late included the cattle and sheep ranch, a charcoal-making operation utilizing the invasive kiawe trees, and a honey business whose yearly production was measured in tons. Picture above: Kamehameha V, King of the Sandwich Islands. Copyright: Corbis. 1 ne of the island’s most famous creatures that, lacking the exotic fish that inhabit traditional industries is, the shallow waters in much of the archipelago, however, still very much alive provide sustenance for hundreds of Hawaiian and wherever Niihauans have Stilts, large wading birds with bold black and white migrated: the creation of the feathers and very long, bright red legs.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Hawaiian Homeownership Hoʻokahua Waiwai (Economic Self-Sufficiency) Fact Sheet, Vol.2016, No
    Native Hawaiian Homeownership Hoʻokahua Waiwai (Economic Self-Sufficiency) Fact Sheet, Vol.2016, No. 1 © Kamakanaokealoha Aquino Research Division Special Projects Unit June 2016 OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS RESEARCH DIVISION Hale Māmalu, Kalihi, Oʻahu, Hawaiʻi. © Wahineʻaipöhaku Tong, 2015 The Significance of a Home Increasing the number of Native Hawaiian Homeowners The location of a home was an important consideration for One of the priorities under the Office of Hawaiian Affairs Native Hawaiians in the 18th century. A kahuna, or expert, (OHA) 2010-2018 strategic plan is to increase Hoʻokahua determined whether an area was hospitable or suitable for Waiwai (Economic Self-sufficiency) for Native Hawaiians. living. Hawaiian scholar David Malo (1851) highlighted the One indicator of economic self-sufficiency is significance of a house as a means of securing well-being for homeownership and OHA’s desired results under the the ʻohana (family). It was an indication of prosperity. strategic plan aims to increase the percentage of Native Hawaiian owner-occupied houses from 56.62% in 2008 to A home was also viewed as a living member of the family 58% in 2018. and community. A kahuna would conduct a dedication ceremony at the completion of a building by performing a This factsheet provides the context of Native Hawaiian moku (navel-cutting ceremony), similar to one given to a homeownership in Hawaiʻi. It begins by highlighting trends child at birth. A prayer and cutting of the thatch by the over time in owner-occupied housing units, household doorway represented severing the piko (navel-chord) of the income and housing costs. This section is followed by an house, thereby making it habitable (Handy, Emory, Bryan, analysis of the differences between counties including Buck and Wise, 1965).
    [Show full text]
  • The Color of Nationality: Continuities and Discontinuities of Citizenship in Hawaiʻi
    The Color of Nationality: Continuities and Discontinuities of Citizenship in Hawaiʻi A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE DECEMBER 2014 By WILLY DANIEL KAIPO KAUAI Dissertation Committee: Neal Milner, Chairperson David Keanu Sai Deborah Halbert Charles Lawrence III Melody MacKenzie Puakea Nogelmeier Copyright ii iii Acknowledgements The year before I began my doctoral program there were less than fifty PhD holders in the world that were of aboriginal Hawaiian descent. At the time I didn’t realize the ramifications of such a grimacing statistic in part because I really didn’t understand what a PhD was. None of my family members held such a degree, and I didn’t know any PhD’s while I was growing up. The only doctors I knew were the ones that you go to when you were sick. I learned much later that the “Ph” in “PhD” referred to “philosophy,” which in Greek means “Love of Wisdom.” The Hawaiian equivalent of which, could be “aloha naʻauao.” While many of my family members were not PhD’s in the Greek sense, many of them were experts in the Hawaiian sense. I never had the opportunity to grow up next to a loko iʻa, or a lo’i, but I did grow up amidst paniolo, who knew as much about makai as they did mauka. Their deep knowledge and aloha for their wahi pana represented an unparalleled intellectual capacity for understanding the interdependency between land and life.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Case for Tongan As an Endangered Language
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Making a Case for Tongan as an provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa Endangered Language Yuko Otsuka At fi rst glance, Tongan appears far from being endangered. It has nearly 100,000 speakers—remarkably sizable compared to other languages of Oceania—and is spoken in a predominantly monolingual and monocul- tural society.1 Furthermore, Tonga is an independent nation-state, in fact, the last kingdom in Polynesia. Why should one be talking at all about Tongan being endangered? This paper examines the linguistic situation in Tonga and argues that there are reasons to be concerned about the future of the Tongan language in the long run. The position put forward in this paper is as follows: In the postcolonial context, many instances of language endangerment should be defi ned in terms of a unit larger than a nation-state. Globalization has put small island nations like Tonga in a position such that, in order to survive, they are compelled to conform to the Western development model that is asso- ciated with English as a socioeconomically privileged language. Here, the term “globalization” refers to a particular aspect of the phenomenon, that is, interconnectedness facilitated by the expansion of Euro-American values. Interconnectedness certainly has benefi cial consequences, such as bringing new opportunities. Epeli Hau‘ofa, for example, has argued that it has empowered the peoples of Oceania, liberating them from the artifi cial boundaries imposed by nineteenth-century imperialism (1993, 10). The following discussion, however, focuses on the adverse effects of intercon- nectedness, especially as it affects language maintenance.
    [Show full text]