Archived Content Information Archivée Dans Le

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archived Content Information Archivée Dans Le Archived Content Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or record-keeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page. Information archivée dans le Web Information archivée dans le Web à des fins de consultation, de recherche ou de tenue de documents. Cette dernière n’a aucunement été modifiée ni mise à jour depuis sa date de mise en archive. Les pages archivées dans le Web ne sont pas assujetties aux normes qui s’appliquent aux sites Web du gouvernement du Canada. Conformément à la Politique de communication du gouvernement du Canada, vous pouvez demander de recevoir cette information dans tout autre format de rechange à la page « Contactez-nous ». CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE / COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES CSC 30 / CCEM 30 EXERCISE/EXERCICE NEW HORIZONS THE BATTLE OF KURSK JULY & AUGUST 1943 By /par Maj I J Phillips REME This paper was written by a student attending La présente étude a été rédigée par un the Canadian Forces College in fulfilment of stagiaire du Collège des Forces canadiennes one of the requirements of the Course of pour satisfaire à l'une des exigences du cours. Studies. The paper is a scholastic document, L'étude est un document qui se rapporte au and thus contains facts and opinions which the cours et contient donc des faits et des opinions author alone considered appropriate and que seul l'auteur considère appropriés et correct for the subject. It does not necessarily convenables au sujet. Elle ne reflète pas reflect the policy or the opinion of any agency, nécessairement la politique ou l'opinion d'un including the Government of Canada and the organisme quelconque, y compris le Canadian Department of National Defence. gouvernement du Canada et le ministère de la This paper may not be released, quoted or Défense nationale du Canada. Il est défendu copied except with the express permission of de diffuser, de citer ou de reproduire cette the Canadian Department of National étude sans la permission expresse du ministère Defence. de la Défense nationale. 1 ABSTRACT The Soviet victory at the battle of Kursk inevitably led to German defeat throughout Europe. It was the most decisive event of World War 2. An examination of Soviet and German Fighting Power before, during and after Kursk demonstrates the newly acquired Soviet ascendancy on the Eastern Front and therefore the ultimate importance of this battle. At Kursk, the lack of operational surprise and the time to prepare enabled the Soviets to destroy key German equipments, capture important transportation centres and gain crucial offensive experience on the way to this victory. Continued qualitative improvement of the Red Army thereafter, combined with sustainable and unparalleled mobilisation and military production, ensured that this success marked the beginning of the end for Hitler and the Third Reich. Events including Stalingrad, Pearl Harbour and Operation Overlord are presented for comparison. All prove to be strategically important but only Kursk can be described as decisive in the defeat of Germany in Europe. 2 There has been no instance yet in the history of wars of the enemy jumping into the abyss of himself. To win a war one must lead the enemy to the abyss and push him in to it. Joseph Stalin, Order of the Day, 23 February 1944 Just five years after Germany’s astoundin yea iltration Ardennes and through the their brea y34.76074com Tm(th-)Tj 12 0 0 12 146.43346 634.76074 Tm(t)Tj 12 0 0 12 149.55585 634.76074 Tm(a)Tj 12 0 0 12 154.71823 634.76074 Tm(k)Tj 12 0 0 12 160.47823 634.76074 Tm(i)Tj 12 0 0 12 163.66063 634.76074 Tm(n)Tj 12 0 0 12 169.48062 634.76074 Tm(g de)Tj12 0 0 12 189.01662 634.76074 Tm(mons)Tj 12 0 0 12 214.18059 634.76074 Tm(tra)Tj 12 0 0 12 226.22858 634.76074 Tm(t)Tj -0.0159 Tc 0.0009 Tw 12 0 0 12 229.31992 634.76074 Tm(ion of)Tj12 0 0 12 256.43274 634.76074 Tm( ‘B)Tj12 0 0 12 270.79796 634.76074 Tm(litzkrieg’, H)Tj12 0 0 12 326.90881 634.76074 Tm(itler )Tj-0.0145 Tc -0.0038 F interpreted at least two ways” largely because the German and Soviet perspectives span different planning timelines.4 For the purposes of this paper, the battle will be defined in its broadest sense and therefore in accordance with official Soviet history.5 That is to say, it began on 5 July 1943 when Germany launched Operation Citadel to capture the Kursk salient and concluded on 23 August 1943 after Soviet forces had completed two counter offensives, Operations Kutuzov and Rumyantsev, which re-established Soviet control in Orel and Kharkov respectively.6 British and Australian military doctrine uses the term ‘Fighting Power’ to define and thereby estimate a state’s “ability to fight.”7 This measure provides the ideal framework for a detailed analysis of Kursk. “Fighting Power is the result of the integration of three interdependent components: the intellectual [conceptual] component provides the knowledge to fight; the moral component provides the will to fight; and the physical component provides the means to fight.”8 In short, a states total Fighting Power is derived from the summation of the moral, physical and conceptual components. To demonstrate that Germany lost the advantage during Kursk, this paper will begin by defining each component of Fighting Power before describing how events dramatically changed their balance during July and August 1943. Having thereby 4 Niklas Zetterling and Anders Frankson, Kursk 1943, A Statistical Analysis, (London: Frank Cass Publishers, 2000), 115. 5 Ibid, xiii. 6 United Kingdom, Department of War Studies, Conventional Operations, … 9-7 and Niklas Zetterling and Anders Frankson, Kursk 1943, …xiii. 7 United Kingdom, Ministry of Defence, Design for Military Operations, The British Military Doctrine, AC 71451, (1996), 4-3. 8 Commonwealth of Australia (Australian Army), Land Warfare Doctrine 1: The Fundamentals of Land Warfare, (1998), 5-1. 4 established that the Soviets held the advantage in all respects after Kursk, the paper will then show that the situation was irretrievable. Contrasting the strategic implications of this event with Stalingrad, Pearl Harbour and the D Day landings will reiterate that the battle of Kursk alone made German defeat in Europe inevitable. As already outlined, the moral component of Fighting Power concerns the ability to get people to fight. “[It] has three fundamental elements: the motivation to achieve the task in hand; effective leadership from those placed in authority; and sound management of all personnel and resources. Together they produce the will to fight.”9 Analysing these elements, it is apparent that the Soviets shifted the moral balance during Kursk by leadership and management only. Motivation was not a factor in this regard since the intensity of emotion inherent within both sides changed little during the war. “[The relationship] between Germany and the Soviet Union had always been one of undisguised hatred and fear…. No war had ever been as brutal as this.”10 This was Nazism versus Communism in what Hitler described as a “war of annihilation.”11 The capability gap between the German and Soviet leaders had narrowed markedly during the two years of fighting prior to Kursk. For Germany, regular operational success achieved through well understood, tried and tested methods had made them intellectually stale and arrogant.12 As a result there was no tangible impetus to improve. “The German commanders who prepared for Kursk thought of their opponents 9 United Kingdom, Ministry of Defence, Army Field Manual, ADP-5 Soldiering, The Military Covenant, AC 71642, (February 2000), 1-3. 10 Phil Grabsky, The Great Commanders, (London: Boxtree Limited, 1993), 165- 166. 11 Len Deighton, Blood, Tears and Folly, (London: Jonathan Cape, 1993), 473. 12 David Glantz and Jonathan House, The Battle of Kursk, (Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1999), 269. 5 as tenacious but inept fighters who had difficulty coordinating the many ingredients for modern warfare.”13 In contrast, by 1943 the Soviet leadership had overcome many of the effects of ‘Stalin’s purges’. Walter Dunn Jr, a military historian, describes this recovery as a product of both battle experience and defeat. Improved [Soviet] leadership resulted for the most part from the experience of two years in combat. Inept generals were weeded out, talented junior commanders were promoted to higher commands, and officer schools turned out thousands of junior grade officers to command the new companies and battalions.14 However, in order to continue its development and thereby gain leadership superiority, the Red Army still needed self-belief. “[Soviet] commanders … were haunted by the terrible realization that never before had the Red Army halted a determined German offensive short of the strategic depths. At Kursk this was the unprecedented mission assigned to them.”15 In his book ‘On War’, Clausewitz highlights the importance of self-belief particularly in situations with great uncertainty. “With uncertainty in one scale, courage and self-confidence must be thrown into the other to correct the balance.”16 In hindsight then, the Soviets’ best chance of victory and therefore gaining self-belief, was to fight in a ‘set-piece’ campaign. The unique circumstances at Kursk, in particular a lack of operational surprise, provided precisely that situation.
Recommended publications
  • Stumbling Colossus: the Red Army on the Eve of World War (Modern War Studies)
    Stumbling Colossus: The Red Army on the Eve of World War (Modern War Studies) By David M. Glantz Stumbling Colossus: The Red Army on the Eve of World War (Modern War Studies) By David M. Glantz Germany's surprise attack on June 22, 1941, shocked a Soviet Union woefully unprepared to defend itself. The day before the attack, the Red Army still comprised the world's largest fighting force. But by the end of the year, four and a half million of its soldiers lay dead. This new study, based on formerly classified Soviet archival material and neglected German sources, reveals the truth behind this national catastrophe. Drawing on evidence never before seen in the West-including combat records of early engagements-David Glantz claims that in 1941 the Red Army was poorly trained, inadequately equipped, ineptly organized, and consequently incapable of engaging in large-scale military campaigns and that both Hitler and Stalin knew it. He provides the most complete and convincing study of why the Soviets almost lost the war that summer, dispelling many of the myths about the Red Army that have persisted since the war and soundly refuting Viktor Suvorov's controversial thesis that Stalin was planning a preemptive strike against Germany. Stumbling Colossus describes the Red Army's command leadership, mobilization and war planning, intelligence activities, and active and reserve combat formations. It includes the first complete Order of Battle of Soviet forces on the eve of the German attack, documents the strength of Soviet armored forces during the war's initial period, and reproduces the first available texts of actual Soviet war plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard Grier on When Titans Clashed: How the Red Army
    David Glantz, Jonathan House. When Titans Clashed: How the Red Army Stopped Hitler. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995. xiii + 414 pp. $29.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-7006-0717-4. Reviewed by Howard D. Grier Published on H-German (April, 1996) David Glantz, America's foremost Soviet mili‐ grad in November 1942. Here the authors depict a tary historian, joins with Jonathan House, Asso‐ Red Army fghting two vicious foes -- the Nazi jug‐ ciate Professor of History at Gordon College in gernaut and Joseph Stalin himself. As German Georgia, to bring us an important and long-need‐ armies swept ever deeper into Soviet territory, ed study. When Titans Clashed: How the Red Stalin repeatedly refused to heed his military ad‐ Army Stopped Hitler demolishes several myths visers, usually with disastrous results. The third and clarifies dozens of unanswered questions. section deals with the turn of the tide from No‐ The book is divided into four sections. In the vember 1942 to December 1943. Glantz and House first part, the authors examine the Red Army from show how the Red Army effectively responded to 1918 to 1941, and set forth their thesis that the the Nazi threat as skilled commanders like Mar‐ Red Army did not achieve victory in the East sim‐ shal Georgi Zhukov, Marshal Aleksandr ply by copying German tactics. In fact, Blitzkrieg- Vasilevsky, and General Alexei Antonov planned style, mobile tactics had been devised and em‐ and executed effective offensive operations of ployed by Russian troops during the Russian Civil their own. Stalin began to show faith in his subor‐ War, decades prior to World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Conclusionconclusion 389 Conclusion
    ConclusionConclusion 389 Conclusion The combat/military effectiveness of an army can be described as the capabil- ity of that institution to sustain itself in the battlefield against hostile forces and to inflict casualties on the opponent by adapting to changing conditions and adopting certain techniques. Combat effectiveness depends on several factors, like recruitment, the combat motivation/loyalty mechanism (an amal- gam of morale and discipline), tactical procedures, the training system, the hardware at the disposal of the military machine, the logistical infrastructure, etc. Let us evaluate these elements in the Indian Army, especially for the period between 1941 and 1945. First, let us analyze the combat contribution of the Indian Army. Winston Churchill and Orde Wingate both had a very low opinion of the Indian Army.1 How far their assessments hold water needs to be evaluated. British India cov- ered 1,630,000 square miles. As a point of comparison, the European part of the USSR extended over 2,110,000 square miles with another 6,460,000 square miles in Asia. In September 1939, Germany had a population of 80 million, the USSR 171 million, Italy 43 million2 and Japan 100 million.3 The Indian Army was not only the largest volunteer force but also the biggest colonial force. But its size pales in comparison with the armies raised by the first class powers during World War II. Malnourishment in the rural sector, political demands (the British could not dare to impose conscription in India for fear of adverse politi- cal repercussions) and imperial prejudice (the Martial Race theory) prevented massive expansion of the Indian Army.
    [Show full text]
  • A War of Reputation and Pride
    A War of reputation and pride - An examination of the memoirs of German generals after the Second World War. HIS 4090 Peter Jørgen Sager Fosse Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History University of Oslo Spring 2019 1 “For the great enemy of truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest -- but the myth -- persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.” – John F. Kennedy, 19621 1John F. Kennedy, Yale University Commencement Address, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkyalecommencement.htm, [01.05.2019]. 2 Acknowledgments This master would not have been written without the help and support of my mother, father, friends and my better half, thank you all for your support. I would like to thank the University Library of Oslo and the British Library in London for providing me with abundant books and articles. I also want to give huge thanks to the Military Archive in Freiburg and their employees, who helped me find the relevant materials for this master. Finally, I would like to thank my supervisor at the University of Oslo, Professor Kim Christian Priemel, who has guided me through the entire writing process from Autumn 2017. Peter Jørgen Sager Fosse, Oslo, 01.05.2019 3 Contents: Introduction………………………………………………………………………...………... 7 Chapter 1, Theory and background………………………………………………..………17 1.1 German Military Tactics…………………………………………………..………. 17 1.1.1 Blitzkrieg, Kesselschlacht and Schwerpunkt…………………………………..……. 17 1.1.2 Examples from early campaigns……………………………………………..……… 20 1.2 The German attack on the USSR (1941)……………………………..…………… 24 1.2.1 ‘Vernichtungskrieg’, war of annihilation………………………………...………….. 24 1.2.2 Operation Barbarossa………………………………………………..……………… 28 1.2.3 Operation Typhoon…………………………………………………..………………. 35 1.2.4 The strategic situation, December 1941…………………………….……………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Memory Revolution Meets the Digital Age Red Army Soldiers Remember World War II by Iva Glisic and Mark Edele*
    The Memory Revolution Meets the Digital Age Red Army Soldiers Remember World War II by Iva Glisic and Mark Edele* This essay analyzes iremember.ru – an open-access oral history collection containing more than 2,500 interviews with Soviet veterans of the Second World War. Launched in 2000 as a small grassroots project, it soon received state backing and grew into a vital element of Russia’s contemporary memory landscape. The essay examines the origins of this project and its value as a historical source; just as well, it explores its evolution and the curious role it plays in contemporary Russian memorial culture. Bringing together history, memory studies, and the study of contemporary politics, the essay argues that iremember.ru provides important insights into both the Soviet experience of the Second World War and the forces that shape political discourse in Russia today. Military life for young infantry recruit Daniil Zlatkin began on July 3, 1941. After several months of intense training, and narrowly avoiding a death sentence after being accused of stealing potatoes to supplement his meagre food rations, Zlatkin found himself boarding a railroad boxcar (teplushka) with “sixty to eighty” other men on a journey to an unknown destination.1 They would disembark to the sounds of gunfire and explosions in the village of Myshkino, near Borodino, some 150 kilometers west of Moscow – a village whose name would remain with Zlatkin for the rest of his life. That evening, a sergeant (starshii serzhant) summoned the new arrivals and demonstrated the workings of the Degtyaryov machine gun. In concluding his lesson, the sergeant asked the men to confirm that they understood how the device * Research and writing were made possible in part by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (DP130101215) and an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT140101100).
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's 'New' Tools for Confronting the West
    Research Paper Keir Giles Russia and Eurasia Programme | March 2016 Russia’s ‘New’ Tools for Confronting the West Continuity and Innovation in Moscow’s Exercise of Power Russia’s ‘New’ Tools for Confronting the West Contents Summary 2 1. Introduction 4 Context 4 What was new in Crimea? 5 2. Russian ‘Hybrid Warfare’? 6 NATO and hybridity 7 Nothing new 8 ‘Hybrid’ viewed from Russia 9 3. The New Russian Army 13 Russia’s military transformation 14 The new Russian soldier 16 Rearmament prospects 17 Implications for neighbours 19 Military intimidation 21 The military outlook 24 The National Defence Control Centre 25 4. The Old Information War 27 Adaptation by trial and error 27 Success or failure? 31 The unimportance of truth 37 Influence – political and economic 40 Consequences 41 Cyber, trolls and bots 44 5. Trigger Points 47 Western responses 49 6. Policy Implications 54 Political 54 Military 55 Strategic communications and media 58 Intelligence and assessment 61 Cyber and information security 62 Deterrence 64 7. Final Word 69 About the Author 70 Acknowledgments 71 1 | Chatham House Russia’s ‘New’ Tools for Confronting the West Summary • In the last two years, Russia has demonstrated its return to an assertive foreign policy by successful military interventions in Ukraine and Syria. The capabilities it employed to do so surprised the West, despite being well advertised in advance and their development described in detail by the Russia-watching community in Western nations. • The distinctive Russian approach to operations in Ukraine gave rise to an impression among some observers that its military had employed fundamentally new concepts of armed conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 2017+ University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2018 German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941 David Sutton University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1 University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Sutton, David, German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Armageddon in Stalingrad: the Stalingrad Trilogy V
    ARMAGEDDON IN STALINGRAD: THE STALINGRAD TRILOGY V. 2: SEPTEMBER - NOVEMBER 1942 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Colonel David M. Glantz, Jonathan M. House | 864 pages | 15 Dec 2009 | University Press of Kansas | 9780700616640 | English | Kansas, United States Armageddon in Stalingrad: The Stalingrad Trilogy v. 2: September - November 1942 PDF Book Their trilogy, backed by meticulous scholarship and refreshingly fair minded, significantly alters long-accepted views of several important aspects of the campaign London: Michael Joseph, Written with the narrative force of a great war novel, this new volume supersedes all previous accounts and forms the centerpiece of the Stalingrad Trilogy, with the upcoming final volume focusing on the Red Army's counter offensive. Armageddon in Stalingrad continues David Glantz and Jonathan House's bold new look at this most iconic military campaign of the Eastern Front and Hitler's first great strategic defeat. Joseph rated it liked it Feb 14, Seller Inventory GRD Seller Rating:. House Publication Lawrence, Kan. They allow the authors to reconstruct the fighting hour by hour, street by street, and even building by building and reveal how Soviet defenders established killing zones throughout the city and repeatedly ambushed German spearheads. But for the serious student of the Eastern Front, I highly, highly recommend it. Your email. Glantz and Jonathan M. In Armageddon in Stalingrad Glantz and House focus mainly on the fighting within the city itself, although some attention is paid to the conduct of German and Soviet operations in the Caucasus and around the city of Voronezh. Include data citation:. ISBN: We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Approaches to Military History
    Karl-Heinz Frieser. The Blitzkrieg Legend: The 1940 Campaign in the West. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2005. xx + 507 pp. $47.50, cloth, ISBN 978-1-59114-294-2. Evan Mawdsley. Thunder in the East: The Nazi-Soviet War 1941-1945. London: Hodder, 2005. xxvi + 502 pp. $35.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-340-80808-5. Reviewed by James V. Koch Published on H-German (June, 2006) The world does not lack for military histories are written about in the historical surveys that of World War II, general or specific. Hence, when college students and others read. They appeal pri‐ new ones appear, it is legitimate to ask, do they marily to specialists who continue to dissect these really provide new information, insights or inter‐ campaigns, both of which are classics in the realm pretations? Both Frieser's look at the astonishing of conventional land warfare. six-week 1940 German campaign in the West that Frieser argues persuasively that Germany drove France out of the war and Mawdsley's ex‐ took several huge risks by attacking France, amination of the titanic 1941-45 German/Soviet Britain, Belgium and the Netherlands (the West‐ battle on the Eastern front meet that test. Both ern Allies) on May 10, 1940. Germany was unpre‐ provide new data, or at least bring together in one pared for anything more than a very short war book data that have been dispersed over many lo‐ and chose a strategy (thrusting through the sup‐ cations. Further, both authors look at these cam‐ posedly impenetrable Ardennes, crossing the paigns a bit differently than previous researchers Meuse, and driving to the Atlantic Coast) that and prod us to reformulate our understanding of could have been frustrated in a half-dozen ways critical aspects of these battles.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership at the Operational Level: Canadian Doctrine and a Soviet
    LEADERSHIP AT THE OPERATIONAL LEVEL:CANADIAN MILITARY HISTORY DOCTRINE ANDASOVIET CASESTUDY Associated Press 9504220378 Muscovites are dwarfed by this giant image of Marshal Zhukov hanging from the Lenin Library, 22 April 1995. by Hugues Canuel Introduction upon the post-Cold-War experience, but they equally reflect the long tradition of Canadian military service in the ore than 15 years have passed since the fall of the framework of the major conflicts of the 20th Century.3 MBerlin Wall. The Canadian Forces (CF) is continuing Furthermore, and given the fundamental nature of the to adapt to the complexities of the post-Cold-War era. underlying principles, the authors of the new leadership As much in Canada as in the rest of the Western world, doctrine have accepted the challenge of elaborating the ‘peace dividends’ were achieved at the same time as the upon a theory applicable to all levels of command – strategic, ‘New World Order’ sank into instability. The 1990s were operational, and tactical – for all ongoing operations difficult years for Canadian military personnel. While conducted by units deployed overseas, as well as for those suffering stringent reductions to their budgets, as well tasked with the smooth running of activities at home, in as to their actual numbers, there was a concurrent and both line and staff positions.4 unexpected increase in overseas military operations. The difficulties that were encountered during some of these deployments, as well as several disciplinary incidents that took place in Canada, attained such notoriety that Commander Hugues Canuel is the Executive Assistant to the Chief Canadian authorities saw fit to effect a robust turnaround.1 of the Maritime Staff at National Defence Headquarters, Ottawa.
    [Show full text]
  • How Did the Red Army of the Soviet Union So Fiercely and Victoriously
    The Story behind the Battle: How did the Red Army of the Soviet Union so fiercely and victoriously defend Stalingrad in 1942-43 despite the lack of trained officers, equipment, preparation, and morale in 1941? Carol Ann Taylor Student No. 30620882 Thesis for Honours Degree of Bachelor of Arts in History School of Social Sciences and Humanities Murdoch University 2012 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Bachelor of Arts in History with Honours at Murdoch University, 2 November 2012 I declare that this thesis is a true account of my own work, unless indicated Signed: Carol Ann Taylor Date: 2 November 2012 Copyright Acknowledgement Form I acknowledge that a copy of this thesis will be held at Murdoch University Library. I understand that, under the provisions s51.2 of the Copyright Act 1968, all or part of this thesis may be copied without infringement of copyright where such a reproduction is for the purpose of study, and research. This statement does not signal any transfer of copyright away from the author. Signed: ................................................................................................ Full Name of Degree: Bachelor of Arts with Honours in History Thesis Title: The Story behind the Battle: How did the Red Army of the Soviet Union so fiercely and victoriously defend Stalingrad in 1942-43 despite the lack of trained officers, equipment, preparation, and morale in 1941? Author: Carol Ann Taylor Year: 2002 Abstract The victory over Axis forces by the Red Army during the Battle of Stalingrad in 1942-1943 is considered one of the major turning points of World War Two.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterarbeit
    MASTERARBEIT Titel der Masterarbeit Western aid for the Soviet Union during World War II Verfasser Denis Havlat, BA angestrebter akademischer Grad Master of Arts (MA) Wien, 2015 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 066 689 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Masterstudium Zeitgeschichte UG 2002 Betreut von: Univ. Prof. Dr. Carsten Burhop 2 Contents Introduction 4 1 The Origins of Lend-Lease: Cash and Carry and aid for Britain 9 Aid for Britain 11 2 The Eastern Front and Western aid 1941 14 The state of the Red Army at the start of the war 18 Lend-Lease 21 The air war 24 The Mediterranean 25 3 The Eastern Front and Western aid 1942 27 Lend-Lease 30 The air war 32 The Mediterranean 35 4 The Eastern Front and Western aid 1943 37 Lend-Lease 39 The air war 42 The Mediterranean 46 5 The Eastern Front and Western aid 1944-45 48 Lend-Lease 50 The air war 52 Italy 56 Western Europe 57 6 The impact of Western aid 60 German military effort used against the Soviet Union and the Western Allies 60 Disruption of German economy 64 Lend-Lease deliveries 66 7 The Russo-German war without Western intervention 71 8 Conclusion 76 Bibliography 79 Abstract 85 3 Introduction It has been seventy years since the end of the Second World War. In the decades following this conflict, thousands of books and articles have been published, examining almost every aspect of the events which took place during this time period. Soldiers, politicians and ordinary civilians alike have composed countless accounts and memoirs, while historians have extensively studied the people, decisions and campaigns which were crucial to World War II.
    [Show full text]