Opposing Brzezinski's „Technotronic Elites“ and Geopolitics. News
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Bruno Antonio Buike Opposing Brzezinski‘s „Technotronic Elites“ and Geopolitics. News from the Dark Side of Progress. - Homework exercise in argumentation-technique © Neuss / Germany: Bruno Buike 2020 Buike Music and Science [email protected] BBWV E16 Bruno Antonio Buike: Opposing Brzezinski‘s „technotronic elites“ and geopolitics. News from the Dark Side of Progress. - Homework exercise in argumentation-technique main language: English Neuss. Bruno Buike 2020 Kommentar zu den Titel-pics: St. Michael vom Monte Sant’ Angelo auf dem Monte Gargano hängt mit dem Deutschen Orden zusammen wie folgt: Im Jahre 2012 hat Kaiser Friedrich II. das Kloster San Leonardo an Hermann von Salza, den IV Hochmeister, übergeben. Danach richteten die Deutschherren einen Prozessionsweg zum Monte Sant’Angelo ein, dessen Pilger- Stationen auf die Ritterweihe durch Ritterschlag vorbereiteten. Quelle: Keyserlingk, Adalbert, Graf von: Monte Gargano. Stuttgart: Urachhaus 1987, 3. Aufl; Kapitel „San Leonardo“ und „Deutschherren“. Ich weise ausdrücklich darauf hin, daß in diesem Buch Informationen und weltanschauliche Hinweise aus dem Umkreis der Anthroposophie des Rudolf Steiner vermischt wurden, allerdings auch relativ einfach unterschieden werden können. ---xxx--- 1. Dies ist ein wissenschaftliches Projekt ohne kommerzielle Interessen. 2. Wer finanzielle Forderungen gegen dieses Projekt erhebt, dessen Beitrag und Name werden in der nächsten Auflage gelöscht. 3. Das Projekt wurde gefördert von der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Sozialamt Neuss. 4. Rechtschreibfehler zu unterlassen, konnte ich meinem Computer trotz Jahrelanger Versuche nicht beibringen. Im Gegenteil: Das Biest fügt immer wieder neue Fehler ein, wo vorher keine waren! 1. This is a scientific project without commercial interests, that is not in bookstores, but free in internet. 2. Financial and legal claims against this proJect, will result in the contribution and the name of contributor in the next edition canceled. 3. This proJect has been sponsored by the Federal Republic of Germany, Department for Social Benefits, city of Neuss. 4. Correct spelling and orthography is subJect of a constant fight between me and my computer – AND THE SOFTWARE in use – and normally the other side is the winning party! E16 Opposing Brzezinski‘s „technotronic elites“ and geopolitics Content 1 TABLE OF CONTENT 1. Introduction – p.1 1.1 Why an exercise in argumentation techniques – even if aged 67? - p.1 1. 2 EXPOSITION of problem: A short quotation from Brzezinski – p.3 2. Embarrasement – p.6 3. The TRUMP-claim of a „President not accusable“ and „self pardonning“ (German) – p.7 4. Assessment / Memo of U.S. Department of Justice: Self-Pardon of President – spotlight on Brzezinski’s context “of legal philosophy” – p.8 5. The CORE of problem: HOW TO CONTROL POWER for to give power LEGITIMATION and ACCEPTANCE? - p.13 6. The counter-argument of „authority“ and „double standards“ – p.13 7. The counter-argument of AGEOLD „kalokagathia“ or (philosophical) „catalog of virtues“ - p.17 8: The case of the „Mosaic 10 commandments“ - REVELATION for ALL, not ARBITRARY CONSTRUCTION „by elites for elites“ – p.20 9. Technotronic elites in action: : Who told the Rockefeller- and Gates-Foundations, that there are „too much“ people on this planet? - p.21 10. Is there an interest of technotronic elites in PERMANENT HIGH DEATHTOLL on humans? - p.29 11. AFRICA MULTIPLE HOLOCAUSTS – p.30 12. TURNING THE „ISLAMIC BELT“ from Algier to Aserbeidschan to Afghanistan into a STONEAGE ZONE with WILLFUL POVERTY, HIGH DEATHTOLL and great CAMPS for originally „free“ people – p.33 13. Killing humans large scale with ARTIFICIAL / TECHNICAL triggered earthquakes – p.39 14. Two special TRIGGERED events: Tshernobyl 1986 and WT-Center 9-11-2001 – p.45 © Neuss. Bruno Buike 2020 E16 Opposing Brzezinski‘s „technotronic elites“ and geopolitics Content 2 15. Funding – Simulations – Monitoring: Is the John-Hopkins Edu a Desaster Response Center or a HEADQUARTER for warlike “pandemia-campaigning” (see chapter 9.) - Is Corona a TEST? - Something to learn on “mathematics of death” – p.51 16. Massmurder as Business-Model: Look on claimed Farmers' suicides in India, on 25% of Argentine people contaminated with dioxin and other reports from the „new brave world“ of progress – p.70 17. Resumee – p.85 18. Outlook – p.93 19. Result-Set for engineers – p.105 20. Appendix: “Waging the hearts in the scales of Tahuti” – premodern metatale from 1st Pharaonic Dynasty of Egypt – English / German – p.106 21. Bibliography – p.122 ---xxx--- © Neuss. Bruno Buike 2020 E16 Opposing Brzezinski‘s „technotronic elites“ and geopolitics 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Why an exercise in argumentation techniques – even if aged 67? In 2019 something strange happened: A former Turkish neighbour, at moment as lecturer in German at Oxford University, visited his sister here in Neuss and insisted, that we should have a „long coffee break“ on the marketplace in Neuss. This was not going to be an exchange of the heavy academical stuff, but rather more tale-telling from his „adventures in searching“ and „journeys to sources“, including his visits to somewhere some OLD Iranian places, to sit down and read ORIGINALS from poetry and philosophy – which is: IN MIDST of the TURMOILS of our somewhat running mad times, with all the war rhethorics and all the dying and all the poverty. What was felt so much OUTSTANDING in such unspectacular coffee break was, that we both really had a CONVERSATION, no exchange of arguments, no HEAVY debate. Well, you see, I am a solo fighter since 40 years now and used to solitude. But at this occasion I suddenly remembered my young years, where we had very similar talking all night long till morning, when stars faded and the sun rose. And we both agreed, that the today situation in any professional European university surrounding, to watch the competition under working conditions of „compartmentalization“ and „need-to-know“ clearance, but not longer to have those harmless exchanges, not aimed directly to any career-issues is a pity, not quite normal – plus superfluently making things difficult more, than they should. I thought this strange tendency of SILENCE without VERBAL COMMUNICATION in the academical everyday-life -experience over and over – and finally came across the question of my youth, WHY Plato wrote Dialogues1 / (DIALOG2) – which are „dia-logs“, in which is applied „dia-lectics“ of some sort. We may say: The characteristics of application of DIALECTICS of some sort may be attached correctly to the GREEKS – whereas we have in the OLD Jewish „art of learning“ Thora in the „Schul“ (as for instance among Chassidim in Eastern Europe), would set an accent on PERSONAL MEETING via „given texts“, by which SOMETHING from the SPIRITUAL CONTENT of texts debated should arise and become such VISIBLE and MORE EXPLICIT. Which is special: to have conversation for probing REASON and conversation to meet something from the DIVINE. Well, thinking hard, I eventually remembered another special type of literature from medieval ages, which were the „Questiones quodlibetales“ - so to say: „debating questions on this and that – and whatever“ - of Thomas of Aquinas, in which Thomas in more INFORMAL way picked OCCASIONAL „problems of actual interest“, to just „probe them little bit“ - but WITHOUT starting HEAVY BOOKS about them, leaving the audience to wait for years for ANY answers! Such my motivation derived from historical examples above may be condensed to the following: 1 See „Dialogue“ in Wikipedia EN URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialogue 2 See „Dialog“ in Wikipedia DE URL https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialog © Neuss. Bruno Buike 2020 E16 Opposing Brzezinski‘s „technotronic elites“ and geopolitics 2 This EXERCISE is PROBING like we do in REAL LIFE and – figuratively speaking – NOT simply on „dead paper“ alone, the style is „little bit spicy“ – to cope especially with these INTERESTING and SPEEDY times of GREAT TRANSFORMATIONS EVERYWHERE, where not everything is „set in stone“. Within this „changing by learning“ process of today, replacing the „good“ with the „better“ with no hesitation, if needed, my actual stand in learning may be roughly speaking described, as follows: I just this year finished the book „Geschichte vor dem Katalysmos“ („History at the eve of Kataklysmos“) and started the next book, which will be mainly on „Hitler in Argentina“. Both books have as underlying problem the question: WHAT IS HISTORY? Is history MADE BY THE OLD GODS of Sumer and Egypt and before that by OLD „God“s“ preparing the planet, coming perhaps from the PLEIADES and / or the „Cygnus-constellation“ („Swan“ over the North Pole) or other constellations like „canis major“ (with Sirius) and so forth? Or shall we assume, that history is MANMADE, following LONG-RANGE PLANS of just „human“ POWER ELITES – (in which some perhaps may suggest the survival of some sort of OLD HALF-GODS, as for instance NIMROD in the Rothschild family – as has been really debated within Farrell, „Babylon Banksters“3)? What ever history might be or not, however, these questions imply, that history IS NOT „arbitrary“, as they today are telling in lots of academical quarters! „Trials for rethinking“ may not be mixed up with elaborated philosophy nor with academical course books. But luckily THIS essay will be worthwhile nevertheless – if not in parts SHOCKING! So this „VIRTUAL debating“ of a „synthetic group with locally absent participants“ may be opened – until our era may return to have re-invented „Plato‘s academia“ or the fully evolved thriving of life „science apparatus“ of the „Library of Alexandria“ or the efforts for „cultivation“ as in the living family surroundings of Master Kong in China, better known in Europe under the name of „Konfuzius“. ---xxx--- 3 See and compare: Farrell, Babylon Banksters. The Alchemy of deep physics, high finance and ancient religion, Port Townsend/WA: Feral House 2010; chapter III/8/B: The Myth of the Rothschild descent from : A second look“, p.96 – chapter III//8//D: the Ancient Contact: The Rothschild -Nimrod-Myth in a wider context, p.