Ministry of the Interior and Administration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Ministry of the Interior and Administration https://archiwum.mswia.gov.pl/en/news/74,The-7th-Polish-German-Intergovernmental-Consultations. html 2021-10-02, 04:05 The page is in the archive. Publication date 04.11.2004 The 7th Polish-German Intergovernmental Consultations 04.11.2004 - The 7th Polish-German intergovernmental consultations have been held today in Cracow. Marek Belka, Prime Minister of Poland, and Gerhard Schroeder, Federal Chancellor of Germany, participated therein. At the same time the talks between ministers were held, with Ryszard Kalisz, Head of the Polish Ministry of Interior and Administration, and Otto Schily, Minister of Interior of the German Federal Republic, participating therein. Paweł Dakowski, Under-secretary of State in the Ministry of Interior and Administration, also joined the meeting. During the consultations the German side officially supported the idea of Poland hosting the EU External Border Management Agency for Operational Cooperation. The next issue under discussion was the procedure for majority voting at the EU Council forum for Judiciary and Interior on the issues of asylum-granting policy and migration. Minister Ryszard Kalisz expressed his understanding for the German point of view on the subject, with the assumption to postpone the introduction of majority voting procedure included therein. Minister Otto Schily stressed that the cooperation between Polish and German services responsible for public security and order has been successfully developing for many years, and is a good sign for the future. During plenary talks held with the participation of heads of governments, Eugeniusz Szczerbak, Deputy Chief of Police, held a meeting with Mr. Max Peter Ratzel, running for the post of the Director of Europol and supported by the German Federal Republic. Tweetnij Generate PDF Print Notify.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

2016 Program Angv5.Pdf
�� Table of contents �� 3 Table of contents Table of contents 4 5 Table of contents Table of contents 6 7 Table of contents Table of contents 8 9 Conference rooms location 1 0 Pijalnia Building A �� Building�� B �� Nowy Dom Zdrojowy ��
[Show full text]
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
[Show full text]
The Politics of Memory in Poland: Lustration, File Access and Court Proceedings
ISSN: 1711-4284 THE POLITICS OF MEMORY IN POLAND: LUSTRATION, FILE ACCESS AND COURT PROCEEDINGS Lavinia Stan Studies in Post-Communism Occasional Paper no. 10 (2006) Centre for Post-Communist Studies St. Francis Xavier University www.stfx.ca/pinstitutes/cpcs Poland adopted limited transitional justice almost a decade on them by the secret political police; and 3) trials and court after its neighbors Germany and the Czech Republic, but de- proceedings against communist officials and secret agents. communization has been one of the most divisive issues in While substantial, the literature on Polish transitional justice the political life of this young democracy.1 Poles remain tends to focus on lustration viewed in isolation from other divided about the communist past. Its effects on nation- methods of dealing with the communist past. It also building and political culture, and the way in which the post- concentrates on the ‘martial law’ trial of General Wojciech communist state should deal with it, are sources of civil Jaruzelski. We know a great deal about the key moments that debate. Some Poles agree with their country’s choice for the steered legislation towards or against lustration, as well as Spanish model wherein transition to democracy is effected the parliamentary debates surrounding the issue, the main without granting public access to secret archives, without arguments for and against the screening process, and the prosecuting communist leaders for human rights trespasses, reasons why lustration has lagged behind in the country.2 We and without blocking ancien regime officials from accessing positions of power and responsibility. Others believe that 2 Poland’s soft stand toward communist repression provides See, for example, Wiktor Osiatynski, “Decommunization and the wrong moral example for younger generations, and Recommunization in Poland,” East European Constitutional Review, vol.
[Show full text]
Russian Gas Transit Through Ukr
�� 76 A Potential for Growth of Commercial Real Estate Market in Central–Eastern Europe as Viewed from Poland in times of Crisis 109 Amendments to the Act on Cleanliness and Order in Communes – Challenges and Dilemmas 67 America’s Pivot to Asia: What Does It Mean for Europe? 174 American LNG vs. Russian Gas Pipelines: Who Will Take the Lead on the European Market? 214 An Assessment of EU Sanctions Towards Selected Eastern Partnership Countries 150 An Opportunity for Everybody – i.e. How to Take Advantage of Knowledge Within an Organization to Fulfill the Strategic Goals? 169 Are Insurers Prepared
[Show full text]
The Choice of Refusal
The choice of refusal https://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article920 Poland The choice of refusal - IV Online magazine - 2005 - IV372 - November 2005 - Publication date: Tuesday 22 November 2005 Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine - All rights reserved Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine Page 1/5 The choice of refusal The right wing victory in Poland's parliamentary elections, held on September 25, 2005 [1] put an end to four years of government by the Democratic Left Alliance, [2] which had been characterized by growing pressure from neoliberal economic fundamentalism (liberalization of the Labour Code, the Hausner Plan, [3] reduction of company taxation, [4] plans to introduce a legal right to lock-outs), support for the US invasion of Iraq and a series of corruption scandals. [https://internationalviewpoint.org/IMG/jpg/lkposter.jpg] These elections however represent something more than a simple changeover of power in Poland. They have brought to light the scale of the social and political crisis in the country after 15 years of the restoration of capitalism. They have shown the growing potential of social protest, which has not found its expression in any of the parties present on the electoral scene nor even, more generally, within the framework of the system of institutionalized parties. If we take account of the fact that just less than 40% of those registered to vote did so, it can be said that the true victors in the parliamentary elections of 2005 were neither the conservatives of the Law and Justice party, [5] nor the neoliberal fundamentalists of the Civic Platform.
[Show full text]
Poland by Krzysztof Jasiewicz
Poland by Krzysztof Jasiewicz Capital: Warsaw Population: 38.2 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$19,160 Source: The data above were provided by The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2012. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Electoral Process 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 Civil Society 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Independent Media 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.75 2.25 2.25 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 Governance* 2.00 2.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a n/a 2.50 2.75 3.25 3.50 3.25 3.25 2.75 2.50 Local Democratic Governance n/a n/a 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 Judicial Framework and Independence 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 Corruption 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.25 3.00 3.00 2.75 3.25 3.25 3.25 Democracy Score 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.14 2.36 2.39 2.25 2.32 2.21 2.14 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
[Show full text]
CSESIII Parties and Leaders Original CSES Text Plus CCNER Additions
CSESIII Parties and Leaders Original CSES text plus CCNER additions (highlighted) =========================================================================== ))) APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS =========================================================================== | NOTES: PARTIES AND LEADERS | | This appendix identifies parties active during a polity's | election and (where available) their leaders. | | The party labels are provided for the codes used in the | micro data variables. Parties A through F are the six | most popular parties, listed in descending order according | to their share of the popular vote in the "lowest" level | election held (i.e., wherever possible, the first segment | of the lower house). | | Leaders A through F are the corresponding party leaders or | presidential candidates referred to in the micro data items. | This appendix reports these names and party affiliations. | | Parties G, H, and I are supplemental parties and leaders | voluntarily provided by some election studies. However, | these are in no particular order. | | If parties are members of electoral blocs, the name of | the bloc is given in parentheses following the appropriate | party labels. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: AUSTRALIA (2007) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. PARTY B Liberal Party John Howard 0101 Peter Costello 02. PARTY A Australian Labor Party Kevin Rudd 0201 Julia Gillard 03. PARTY C National Party Mark Vaile 0301
[Show full text]
Poland Page 1 of 12
2005 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices in Poland Page 1 of 12 Facing the Threat Posed by Iranian Regime | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Poland Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Poland, with a population of 39 million, is a multiparty democracy with a bicameral parliament. Executive power is shared by the prime minister, the council of ministers, and, to a lesser extent, the president. On September 25, free and fair parliamentary elections were held. Lech Kaczynski was elected president in a free and fair election on October 23. The civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces. The government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, there were problems in some areas. The following human rights problems were reported: poor prison conditions occasional lengthy pretrial detention a poorly functioning judicial system restrictions on freedom of speech and of the press discrimination against women in the labor market the sexual exploitations of children trafficking in women and children societal discrimination and violence against ethnic minorities violations of workers' rights and antiunion discrimination RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were no reports that the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. In May 2004 police officers in Lodz accidentally used live ammunition rather than gum bullets to pacify crowds at a student festival, and two people were killed. As a result of this incident and the ensuing investigation, 12 police officers faced disciplinary action, including the Lodz regional police commander, city commander, and deputy city commander, who lost their jobs.
[Show full text]
Poland by Andrzej Krajewski
Poland by Andrzej Krajewski Capital: Warsaw Population: 38.1 million GNI/capita: US$14,250 The social data above was taken from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development’s Transition Report 2007: People in Transition, and the economic data from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators 2008. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Electoral Process 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 Civil Society 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.25 Independent Media 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.75 2.25 2.25 Governance* 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic 3.50 Governance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.50 2.75 3.25 Local Democratic 2.25 Governance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.00 2.00 2.25 Judicial Framework 2.50 and Independence 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.25 2.25 Corruption 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.25 3.00 3.00 Democracy Score 1.58 1.58 1.63 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.14 2.36 2.39 * With the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
[Show full text]
Transition, Justice and Transitional Justice in Poland Stan, Lavinia
www.ssoar.info Transition, justice and transitional justice in Poland Stan, Lavinia Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Stan, L. (2006). Transition, justice and transitional justice in Poland. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 6(2), 257-284. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-56138-8 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0/deed.de Transition, Justice and Transitional Justice in Poland 257 Transition, Justice and Transitional Justice in Poland LAVINIA STAN Poland adopted limited transitional justice almost a decade after its neighbors Germany and the Czech Republic, but de-communization has been one of the most divisive issues in the political life of this young democracy1. Poles remain divided about the communist past, its effects on nation-building and political culture, and the way in which the post-communist state should deal with it. Some agree with their country’s choice for the Spanish model, whereas transition to democracy is ef- fected without granting public access to secret archives, prosecuting communist leaders for human rights trespasses, and blocking ancien regime officials from access- ing positions of power and responsibility. Others believe that Poland’s soft stand to- ward communist repression provides the wrong moral example for younger gen- erations, and allows former communists to succeed in the market economy and open electoral competition.
[Show full text]
Polityka Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego Gabinetów Z Udziałem Sojuszu Lewicy Demokratycznej
106 BOLESŁAW SPRENGEL ARTYKUŁY „Polityka i Społeczeństwo” 3(12) / 2014 Bolesław Sprengel POLITYKA BEZPIECZEŃSTWA WEWNĘTRZNEGO GABINETÓW Z UDZIAŁEM SOJUSZU LEWICY DEMOKRATYCZNEJ Polityka bezpieczeństwa a polityka lewicowa Bezpieczeństwo wewnętrzne zajmuje marginalne znaczenie w bada- niach nad polityką partii politycznych i rządów III Rzeczypospolitej. Dotyczy to zarówno monografii poświęconych koncepcjom politycznym oraz roli polityków w polityce bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego. Autorzy tego typu opracowań na ogół ograniczają się do pobieżnego przedsta- wienia poglądów szefów rządu zawartych w ich exposé. Brak natomiast analizy ich działalności i praktyki rządzenia. Co więcej, brak jest badań nad celami polityki bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego kolejnych gabinetów politycznych rządzących w minionym dwudziestopięcioleciu. Tym sa- mym nie zbadano różnic między praktyką rządów reprezentujących róż- ne orientacje polityczne. W tej sytuacji konieczne wydaje się zbadanie celów politycznych realizowanych przez gabinety koalicyjne z udziałem Sojuszu Lewicy Demokratycznej, aby poznać ich specyfikę oraz od- mienność w podejściu do bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego kraju. Pytania dotyczą m.in. centralizacji i decentralizacji, koncentracji i dekoncentracji polityki bezpieczeństwa oraz podejścia do stanowienia i stosowania prawa. W ujęciu ekonomicznym pytanie dotyczy m.in. dążenia do pod- noszenia jakości działania, zwiększania lub zmniejszania nakładów na bezpieczeństwo wewnętrzne oraz stosunku do polityki społecznej jako instrumentu poprawy bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego. Udzielenie wy- czerpującej odpowiedzi na wszystkie te pytania przekracza możliwości tej publikacji. Podjęte tu starania mają pomóc w dalszych, bardziej szczegółowych badaniach. W tekście tym dokonano analizy logicznej i językowej wybranych dokumentów. Bardzo przydatna była tu analiza Wydział Politologii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Ko- pernika w Toruniu, ul. Batorego 39L, 87-100 Toruń, e-mail: [email protected] Polityka bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego gabinetów... 107 instytucjonalno-prawna.
[Show full text]
Title: Mediatizing Secular State : Media, Religion and Politics in Contemporary Poland
Title: Mediatizing Secular State : Media, Religion and Politics in Contemporary Poland Author: Damian Guzek Citation style: Guzek Damian. (2019). Mediatizing Secular State : Media, Religion and Politics in Contemporary Poland. Berlin : Peter Lang, doi 10.3726/b15404 Wydanie książki dofinansowane ze środków Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach. Książka udostępniona w otwartym dostępie na podstawie umowy między Uniwersytetem Śląskim a wydawcą. Książkę możesz pobierać z Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Śląskiego i korzystać z niej w ramach dozwolonego użytku. Aby móc umieścić pliki książki na innym serwerze, musisz uzyskać zgodę wydawcy (możesz jednak zamieszczać linki do książki na serwerze Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Śląskiego). Studies in Communication and Politics 8 8 Studies in Communication and Politics 8 Damian Guzek Damian Guzek Damian Guzek Damian Mediatizing Secular State The book provides an empirically based analysis of changes on how various political and denominational actors seek to influence the Church and state Mediatizing Secular State relationship, as well as how we understand the idea of the secular state. A set of case studies shows how and why changes in the coverage of the secular Media, Religion and Politics state and Church-state relations have followed the dynamics of media logic. By establishing a grounded theory based on media content, legal regulations and in Contemporary Poland political party programs in the years 1989–2015 as well as a current survey, the author throws new light on the theory of mediatization. The book demonstrates that the disseminated idea of the secular state is largely a result of the adaptation of both political and religious representatives to a dynamically changing media logic. “The book is the first study of this kind showing the Polish perspective.
[Show full text]