DOCSLIB.ORG

Relationship: Alfred Landon Peterson to Enoch Enoch Is the 136Th Great Grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Relationship: Alfred Landon Peterson to Enoch Enoch Is the 136Th Great Grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson Relationship: Alfred Landon Peterson to Enoch Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 136th great grandfather Enoch Edna b: 3382 BC b: d: Abt. 3017 BC d: 135th great grandfather Methusaleh b: Abt. 3317 BC d: Abt. 2348 BC 134th great grandfather Lamech b: Abt. 3126 BC d: Abt. 2349 BC 133rd great grandfather Noah b: Abt. 2944 BC d: Abt. 1994 BC 132nd great grandfather Shem b: 2444 BC d: 1842 BC Abt 1842 B.c. 131st great grandfather Kesed Ben Arpachshad b: 2344 BC Mesha, Balochistan, Pakistan d: 1906 BC Mesha, Balochistan, Pakistan Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 130th great grandfather Shelah Salah of Chaldea b: 2307 BC Bc,Jerusalem,Palestine, d: 1874 BC Bc,Jerusalem,Palestine Age, 129th great grandfather Eber Heber ' ibn SHELAH b: Abt. 2277 BC Chaldea d: Abt. 1813 BC Babylon 128th great grandfather Pelag ben Eber Heber 'Aybar b: Abt. 2243 BC Shinar d: Abt. 2004 BC Canaan, Jerusalem 127th great grandfather Rague Ben Peleg the Semite b: Yerushalayim, Israel d: 1978 BC Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Langue 126th great grandfather Serug Ben Rague the Semite b: 2185 BC Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Langue d: 1951 BC Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Langue 125th great grandfather Nahor Ben Serug the Semite b: 2151 BC Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Langue d: 2003 BC Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Langue 124th great grandfather Tarakr ben Nahor the Semite b: 2122 BC Ur, Pyrenees-Orientales, Langue d: 1921 BC Aram, Paktia, Afghanistan Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 123rd great grandfather A ben Terah the Semite b: 1996 BC Ur, Sumeria d: 1896 BC at Canaan 122nd great grandfather ISAAC BEN ABRAHAM b: 1956 BC Hebron d: 1816 BC Hebron 121st great grandfather Jacob Israel ben Isaac b: 1892 Aram, Paktia, Afghanistan d: 1749 Tishri 10 or Atonement in Rames 120th great grandfather Judah ben Jacob b: 1836 BC palestine d: 1707 BC Rameses, Egypt 119th great grandfather Zerah ben J the Judahites b: 1738 Hebron, Canaan, Israel d: 1638 Rameses,Goshen Egypt 118th great grandfather Darda D King of Acadia b: 1414 Minor, Yakutia, Russia d: 1414 Rameses, Goshen, Egypt 117th great grandfather King E Of Dardania b: 1670 BC Minor, Yakutia, Russia d: 1374 BC Minor, Yakutia, Russia Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 116th great grandfather King Tios Tros Of Acadia b: 1375 BC Phrygia, Western, Turkey, Turkey d: 1330 BC Minor, Yakutia, Russia 115th great grandfather King Ilus Iiwas of Troy b: 1345 BC Ancient Troy d: 1279 BC Ancient Babylon 114th great grandfather Laomedon Troy b: 1315 Dardania, Phrygia, NW, Turkey d: 1235 Minor, Yakutia, Russia 113th great grandfather Priam I Podarces P Of Troy b: 1270 BC Troy, Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor d: 1183 BC Troy, Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor 112th great grandfather Helenus I Heleno S Troy b: Bef. 1185 BC Troad, Troy, Greece d: 1149 111th great grandfather Genger Zenter the Scythians b: Scythia, now, Ukraine d: 1149 Troy, Greece 110th great grandfather Franco the Scythian b: 1149 Scythia, now, Ukraine d: Troy, Greece Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 109th great grandfather Esdron The Trojan b: 1190 BC Troy d: Troy, 108th great grandfather Gelio Zelius G the TROJAN b: 1160 Troy, Turkey d: before Christ, Sud-Est, Haiti 107th great grandfather BASABILIANO I Cimmerians b: 1130 Minor, Yakutia, Russia d: Troy, Turkey 106th great grandfather PLASERIUS I Plaserio b: 1130 Minor, Yakutia, Russia d: Troy, Turkey 105th great grandfather PLESERON the Trojan b: 1100 BC Troy, Turkey d: 1050 104th great grandfather ELIACOR The Trojan b: 1085 Minor, Yakutia, Russia d: Minor, Yakutia, Russia 103rd great grandfather GABERIANO Z Trojans b: 1055 BC Troy, Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor d: Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 102nd great grandfather Plaserio Trojans b: 1025 Troy, Turkey d: before Christ, Sud-Est, Haiti 101st great grandfather Antenor I Trojan b: Minor, Yakutia, Russia d: Christ, Sud-Est, Haiti 100th great grandfather Priam II Trianus the Trojan b: Abt. 820 BC Troy, Turkey d: Abt. 770 BC 99th great grandfather Helenus II the Trojan b: Abt. 790 BC Troy, Turkey d: Abt. 740 BC before Christ 98th great grandfather Plesron II the Trojan b: Abt. 760 BC Sea, Sulawesi Tengah, Indonesia d: Abt. 710 BC Troy, Greece 97th great grandfather "King Basabiliano or Trojans b: 875 BC Troy, Turkey (Cimmerians) d: Troy, Greece 96th great grandfather A King of the Trojans b: 845 BC Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, d: 777 BC Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 95th great grandfather Priam III King of Cimmerians b: 720 AD Troy,Troad,Phrygia,Asia Minor no d: 650 AD Troy,Troad,Phrygia,Asia Minor no 94th great grandfather Gentilanor King Cimmerians b: 698 BC Troy,Troad,Phrygia,Asia Minor no d: 620 BC Troy,Troad,Phrygia,Asia Minor no 93rd great grandfather Almadion ( Cimmerians b: 672 BC Troy,Troad,Phrygia,Asia Minor no d: Troy,Troad,Phrygia,Asia Minor no 92nd great grandfather DILUGLIO II, K Cimmerians b: 635 BC Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, d: Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, 91st great grandfather Marcomiro I K Cimmerians b: 605 BC Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, d: 562 BC Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, 90th great grandfather Primo IV King of Cimmerians b: 544 BC Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, d: 450 BC Troad, Phrygia, Asia Minor now, 89th great grandfather Helenus IV King Cimmerians b: 555 BC , Sicambrian King d: 443 BC Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 88th great grandfather Antenor King of T Sicamber b: 526 BC d: 441 BC Cinmerians, ,, 87th great grandfather MARCOMIR I King Sicamber b: 495 BC Troy, Macedonia d: 411 BC Troy, Macedonia 86th great grandfather Antenor II King Sicamber b: 465 BC Old, , , Germany d: 381 BC Sicambri, Western Europe, Franc 85th great grandfather Priam of Sicamber b: 417 AD Old, , , Germany d: 358 AD Minor, Yakutia, Russia 84th great grandfather Helenus I of Sicamber b: 385 BC Old, , , Germany d: 339 BC Gaul, , , France 83rd great grandfather Diocles of Sicamber b: 360 BC Old, , , Germany d: 299 BC , , Gaul, France 82nd great grandfather Basanus Magnus K Sicambri b: 304 BC d: 241 BC Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 81st great grandfather C Sicambri 250BC to 232BC b: 290 BC Helvita, Macedonia d: 232 BC , , British Columbia, Canada 80th great grandfather Nicanor King of Sicambri b: 275 BC Old, , , Germany d: 198 BC Sicambria, , Western Europe, Fra 79th great grandfather King Marcomir II of Sicambri b: Sciambri d: 170 AD BC 78th great grandfather King Clodius of Sicambri b: Sicambria, , Western Europe, Fra d: 159 AD BC 77th great grandfather Antenor III King Sicambri b: Descendants, Called, Sicambri d: 143 BC Sicambri, Ukraine 76th great grandfather Clodomir II King Sicambri b: Helvita, Macedonia d: Abt. 123 BC , , British Columbia, Canada 75th great grandfather Merodochus, King Sicambri b: 123 BC Macedonia d: 95 BC Gual, France Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 74th great grandfather Cassander ( of SICAMBRI b: Bef. 95 BC d: 74 BC Old Sachsen, Germany 73rd great grandfather Antharius of the SICAMBRI b: Abt. 77 BC d: Abt. 36 BC k. in Battle with the Gauls 72nd great grandfather F of the WEST FRANKS b: Abt. 57 BC , , , France d: 5 AD , , , France 71st great grandfather Clodius II K of the FRANKS b: Abt. 37 BC Old, , Sachsen, Germany d: Abt. 20 AD Old, , Sachsen, Germany 70th great grandfather M King of The Franks b: Abt. 17 BC Sicambria d: Abt. 50 AD Old, , Sachsen, Germany 69th great grandfather Clodomir King of the Franks b: 3 AD d: 63 AD 68th great grandfather Antenor IV King the Franks b: 25 AD , , , France d: 69 AD , , , France Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 67th great grandfather Ratherius King of the Franks b: France, Lot-et-Garonne, Aquitain d: 90 AD 66th great grandfather Richemer King of the Franks b: 40 AD Area Later Called West, , Frieslan d: 114 AD Old Saxony, Germany 65th great grandfather O the Franks 114 to 128 b: 60 AD Austrasia, , , France d: 128 AD Old, , Sachsen, Germany 64th great grandfather Marcomir King of the Franks b: Abt. 90 AD Austrasia, , , France d: 149 AD Old, , Sachsen, Germany 63rd great grandfather Clodomir King of the Franks b: 104 AD Austrasia,,,France d: 166 AD Old,,Sachsen,Germany 62nd great grandfather Farabert, K of the FRANKS b: 122 AD Austrasia,,France d: 186 AD Old,,, Sachsen, Germany 61st great grandfather Sunno King of the Franks b: 137 AD Ville De, Paris, Ile-de-France, Fra d: 213 AD Old, , Sachsen, Germany Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 60th great grandfather Hilderic Franks b: Abt. 160 AD Cologne, Westfalia, Germany d: 253 AD Old, Sachsen, Germany 59th great grandfather King Of The West Franks b: 180 AD Misc,,,Germany d: 272 AD ,,,France 58th great grandfather Clodius Franks b: 200 AD Paris,Ville De Paris,,France d: 298 AD ,,Westfalen,Germany 57th great grandfather Walter Franks b: 220 AD Austrasia,,,France d: 306 AD ,,,France 56th great grandfather Dagobert I King Of T Franks b: 230 AD ,,,Germany d: 317 AD ,,,Germany 55th great grandfather Genebald Franks b: 262 AD Old,,Sachsen,Germany d: 358 AD ,,,Germany 54th great grandfather Dagobert Franks b: 300 AD Old,,Sachsen,Germany d: 379 AD Old,,Sachsen,Germany Enoch is the 136th great grandfather of Alfred Landon Peterson 53rd great grandfather Clodius Franks b: 324 AD Old,,Sachsen,Germany d: 389 AD Old,,Sachsen,Germany 52nd great grandfather Marcomir Franks b: 347 AD ,,,Germany d: 404 AD
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Performing Death in Tyre: the Life and Afterlife of a Roman Cemetery in the Province of Syria
    University of Groningen Performing Death in Tyre de Jong, Lidewijde Published in: American Journal of Archaeology DOI: 10.3764/aja.114.4.597 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2010 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): de Jong, L. (2010). Performing Death in Tyre: The Life and Afterlife of a Roman Cemetery in the Province of Syria. American Journal of Archaeology, 114(4), 597-630. https://doi.org/10.3764/aja.114.4.597 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhine: Germany's River, Not Germany's Boundary
    Source: E.M. Arndt, Deutschlands Fluss, aber nicht Deutschlands Gränze, English trl. UvA Talen / SPIN. the French was as bad as it was foolish. One would have The Rhine: Germany’s river, not Germany’s thought that ten years, indeed twenty years, of blindness and misfortune might have sent a little light into their dark minds boundary and brought the errants back into line, especially since the French had long ago overturned their own proof, but far from it. There are still many who behave, indeed who exhaust Ernst Moritz Arndt themselves in deductions and proofs, as if the Rhine as the border between France and Germany is something indispu- table and settled. So effective is constant repetition, and so little are most Germans – who pride themselves on their ‘The Rhine is France’s natural boundary’ is what Sully proved profundity in thought and speech – accustomed to thinking. 1600 and 1610; ‘the Rhine is France’s natural boundary,’ The empty echoing of foreign opinions, especially the proclaimed Richelieu in 1625 and 1635; ‘the Rhine is France’s echoing of French hocus-pocus and sophistries, has sadly natural boundary,’ declared Count d’Avaux in the 1640s at become too much of a fashion on this side of the Rhine, in Münster, in the holy places where Hermann the Cheruscan had the country where thoroughness and depth of thought is once made a dufferent typeof declaration to the Romans; ‘the supposed to reside. Given this state of affairs, especially this Rhine is France’s natural boundary,’ resounded from 1670 to sad state of German minds and hearts, I consider it not super- 1700 in Louvois’ and Colbert’s speeches in Louis XIV’s council fluous to present our ancient, magnificent and holy River of state, and the court poets Boileau and Racine sang it in the Rhine, what it was, is and will be, to the good German antechamber; ‘the Rhine is France’s natural boundary’ cried the people, who are confused by too many political prattlers and monsters on the Seine from 1790 to 1800.
    [Show full text]
  • Ptolemaic Foundations in Asia Minor and the Aegean As the Lagids’ Political Tool
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 20 (2013): 57–76 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.13.004.1433 PTOLEMAIC FOUNDATIONS IN ASIA MINOR AND THE AEGEAN AS THE LAGIDS’ POLITICAL TOOL Tomasz Grabowski Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków Abstract: The Ptolemaic colonisation in Asia Minor and the Aegean region was a signifi cant tool which served the politics of the dynasty that actively participated in the fi ght for hegemony over the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea basin. In order to specify the role which the settlements founded by the Lagids played in their politics, it is of considerable importance to establish as precise dating of the foundations as possible. It seems legitimate to acknowledge that Ptolemy II possessed a well-thought-out plan, which, apart from the purely strategic aspects of founding new settlements, was also heavily charged with the propaganda issues which were connected with the cult of Arsinoe II. Key words: Ptolemies, foundations, Asia Minor, Aegean. Settlement of new cities was a signifi cant tool used by the Hellenistic kings to achieve various goals: political and economic. The process of colonisation was begun by Alex- ander the Great, who settled several cities which were named Alexandrias after him. The process was successfully continued by the diadochs, and subsequently by the follow- ing rulers of the monarchies which emerged after the demise of Alexander’s state. The new settlements were established not only by the representatives of the most powerful dynasties: the Seleucids, the Ptolemies and the Antigonids, but also by the rulers of the smaller states. The kings of Pergamum of the Attalid dynasty were considerably active in this fi eld, but the rulers of Bithynia, Pontus and Cappadocia were also successful in this process.1 Very few regions of the time remained beyond the colonisation activity of the Hellenistic kings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Background
    Cultural Background Funerary Patterns in Lebanon—From the Bronze Age to the Roman Period By Signe Krag 2 Hellenistic Cities in the Levant By Eva Mortensen 8 Hellenistic and Roman Sarcophagi in the Levant By Philip Ebeling 12 Maron and the Maronites By Niels Bargfeldt 19 1 Agora nr. 8 2011 Funerary Patterns in Lebanon—From the Bronze Age to the Roman Period By Signe Krag During the Bronze Age inhumation burials were the Photo: Signe Krag common practice in Lebanon. The evidence is very limited, but it suggests that several types of burials were used at the same time, namely jar burials (with inhumed infants and small children), rock-cut tombs, pit graves, cist graves and hypogea with chambers and possible sarcophagi. The burial gifts seem to have been placed in the graves according to the sex of the deceased, as men are often buried with weapons and women are buried with domes- tic objects and jewellery. Furthermore, luxury items are placed in some of the graves, a fact which sug- gests the existence of a society with marked social differences. At Sidon we find evidence for the prac- tice of animal sacrifice, and ovens that are placed at Fig. 1: The sarcophagus of Ahiram depicting mourning women. the graves suggest a belief in the afterlife of the deceased. On the sarcophagus of Ahiram from Byblos are depictions of mourning women which could tell us how the deceased was mourned. The evidence comes mainly from Beirut, Sidon and Byblos. During the Iron Age both inhumation and cremation burials were in use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cimbri of Denmark, the Norse and Danish Vikings, and Y-DNA Haplogroup R-S28/U152 - (Hypothesis A)
    The Cimbri of Denmark, the Norse and Danish Vikings, and Y-DNA Haplogroup R-S28/U152 - (Hypothesis A) David K. Faux The goal of the present work is to assemble widely scattered facts to accurately record the story of one of Europe’s most enigmatic people of the early historic era – the Cimbri. To meet this goal, the present study will trace the antecedents and descendants of the Cimbri, who reside or resided in the northern part of the Jutland Peninsula, in what is today known as the County of Himmerland, Denmark. It is likely that the name Cimbri came to represent the peoples of the Cimbric Peninsula and nearby islands, now called Jutland, Fyn and so on. Very early (3rd Century BC) Greek sources also make note of the Teutones, a tribe closely associated with the Cimbri, however their specific place of residence is not precisely located. It is not until the 1st Century AD that Roman commentators describe other tribes residing within this geographical area. At some point before 500 AD, there is no further mention of the Cimbri or Teutones in any source, and the Cimbric Cheronese (Peninsula) is then called Jutland. As we shall see, problems in accomplishing this task are somewhat daunting. For example, there are inconsistencies in datasources, and highly conflicting viewpoints expressed by those interpreting the data. These difficulties can be addressed by a careful sifting of diverse material that has come to light largely due to the storehouse of primary source information accessed by the power of the Internet. Historical, archaeological and genetic data will be integrated to lift the veil that has to date obscured the story of the Cimbri, or Cimbrian, peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan
    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period by Ryan Anthony Boehm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emily Mackil, Chair Professor Erich Gruen Professor Mark Griffith Spring 2011 Copyright © Ryan Anthony Boehm, 2011 ABSTRACT SYNOIKISM, URBANIZATION, AND EMPIRE IN THE EARLY HELLENISTIC PERIOD by Ryan Anthony Boehm Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor Emily Mackil, Chair This dissertation, entitled “Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period,” seeks to present a new approach to understanding the dynamic interaction between imperial powers and cities following the Macedonian conquest of Greece and Asia Minor. Rather than constructing a political narrative of the period, I focus on the role of reshaping urban centers and regional landscapes in the creation of empire in Greece and western Asia Minor. This period was marked by the rapid creation of new cities, major settlement and demographic shifts, and the reorganization, consolidation, or destruction of existing settlements and the urbanization of previously under- exploited regions. I analyze the complexities of this phenomenon across four frameworks: shifting settlement patterns, the regional and royal economy, civic religion, and the articulation of a new order in architectural and urban space. The introduction poses the central problem of the interrelationship between urbanization and imperial control and sets out the methodology of my dissertation. After briefly reviewing and critiquing previous approaches to this topic, which have focused mainly on creating catalogues, I point to the gains that can be made by shifting the focus to social and economic structures and asking more specific interpretive questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 73 (1988) 15–18 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt Gmbh, Bonn
    EDITH HALL WHEN DID THE TROJANS TURN INTO PHRYGIANS? ALCAEUS 42.15 aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 73 (1988) 15–18 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 15 WHEN DID THE TROJANS TURN INTO PHRYGIANS? ALCAEUS 42.15 The Greek tragedians reformulated the myths inherited from the epic cycle in the light of the distinctively 5th-century antithesis between Hellene and barbarian. But in the case of the Trojans the most significant step in the process of their "barbarisation" was their acquisition of a new name, "Phryg- ians".1) In the Iliad, of course, the Phrygians are important allies of Troy, but geographically and politically distinct from them (B 862-3, G 184-90, K 431, P 719). The force of the distinction is made even plainer by the composer of the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite, which may date from as early as the 7th century,2) where the poet introduces as an example of the goddess's power the story of her seduction of Anchises. She came to him in his Trojan home, pre- tending to be a mortal, daugter of famous Otreus, the ruler of all Phrygia (111-112). But then she immediately explained why they could converse with- out any problem (113-116); I know both your language and my own well, for a Trojan nurse brought me up in my palace: she took me from my dear mother and reared me when I was a little child. And that is why I also know your language well. So the Trojans and Phrygians are quite distinct, politically, geographically, and linguistically.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Franks Free
    FREE THE HISTORY OF THE FRANKS PDF Bishop of Tours Saint Gregory,Lewis Thorpe | 720 pages | 01 Apr 1983 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780140442953 | English | London, United Kingdom Gregory of Tours - Wikipedia Gregory of Tours 30 November c. He was born Georgius Florentius and later added the name Gregorius in honour of his maternal great- grandfather. His most notable work was his Decem Libri Historiarum Ten Books of Historiesbetter known as the Historia Francorum History of the Franksa title that later chroniclers gave to it, but he is The History of the Franks known for his accounts of the miracles of saints, especially four books of the miracles of Martin of Tours. Martin's tomb was a major pilgrimage destination in the 6th century, and St. Gregory's writings had the practical effect of promoting this highly organized devotion. Gregory was The History of the Franks in Clermontin the Auvergne region of central Gaul. Gregory had several noted bishops and saints as close relatives his family effectively monopolised the Bishoprics of Tours, Lyons, and Langres at the time of his birthand, according to Gregory, he was connected to thirteen of the eighteen bishops of Tours preceding him by ties of kinship. Gregory's paternal grandmother, Leocadia, descended from Vettius Epagatus, the illustrious martyr of Lyons. His father evidently died while Gregory was young and his widowed mother moved to Burgundy where she had property. Gregory went to live with his paternal uncle St. Gallus, Bishop of Clermontunder whom, and his successor St. Avitus, Gregory had his education. Gregory also received the clerical tonsure from Gallus.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches to Community and Otherness in the Late Merovingian and Early Carolingian Periods
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by White Rose E-theses Online Approaches to Community and Otherness in the Late Merovingian and Early Carolingian Periods Richard Christopher Broome Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of History September 2014 ii The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Richard Christopher Broome to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. © 2014 The University of Leeds and Richard Christopher Broome iii Acknowledgements There are many people without whom this thesis would not have been possible. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor, Ian Wood, who has been a constant source of invaluable knowledge, advice and guidance, and who invited me to take on the project which evolved into this thesis. The project he offered me came with a substantial bursary, for which I am grateful to HERA and the Cultural Memory and the Resources of the Past project with which I have been involved. Second, I would like to thank all those who were also involved in CMRP for their various thoughts on my research, especially Clemens Gantner for guiding me through the world of eighth-century Italy, to Helmut Reimitz for sending me a pre-print copy of his forthcoming book, and to Graeme Ward for his thoughts on Aquitanian matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Lanaken En De Vroegste Geschiedenis Van Franken En Merovingen
    Lanaken en de vroegste geschiedenis van Franken en Merovingen Jozef Van Loon, KANTL Samenvatting De Limburgse plaatsnaam Lanaken is een historisch gedenkwaardig toponiem. Traditioneel wordt hij verklaard als een naam op -iniaca(s), maar klankwettig is dat onmogelijk. Hetzelfde bezwaar geldt voor talloze Franse toponiemen die met het suffix worden gereconstrueerd. Een nauwkeuriger onderscheiding van de vele varianten die terug- gaan op het Keltische ākos-suffix, maakt het mogelijk deze namen nauwkeuriger te periodiseren, van late prehistorie tot Vroegkarolin- gische tijd. Lanaken zelf is aldus te reconstrueren als *Hluþenakōm, een naamformatie die wellicht uit de tweede eeuw n.C. dateert. Het eerste deel van het toponiem bevat de naam van de Germaanse godin Hluthena, die in de Romeinse tijd vooral werd vereerd in het gebied van de Sugambri, en is tevens het kenmerkende naambestanddeel van de Merovingische dynastie die uit die stam is voortgekomen. Van de oudst bekende naamdrager, Chlodio, wordt aangetoond dat hij voluit Chlodebaudes heette, een naam die alleen voorkomt in enkele genea- logieën die tot nu onbetrouwbaar werden geacht. Het artikel gaat zijdelings ook in op de etymologie van de namen Liedekerke, Luik, Montenaken, Salii, Sinnich, Thüringen en Vicus Helena. Summary A new etymology of the Limburg place-name Lanaken leads to far- reaching conclusions with respect to the descent of the Merovingian dynasty and their Frankish origins. Traditionally, the name Lanaken, like many French place-names in -y, -ies etc., has been seen as containing the Gallo-Roman suffix -iniaca(s). However, this recon- struction runs into problems with the historical sound laws of Dutch and French.
    [Show full text]
  • De Eindeloze Stad: Troje En Trojaanse Oorsprongsmythen in De (Laat)Middeleeuwse En Vroegmoderne Nederlanden
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) De eindeloze stad: Troje en Trojaanse oorsprongsmythen in de (laat)middeleeuwse en vroegmoderne Nederlanden Keesman, W.A. Publication date 2014 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Keesman, W. A. (2014). De eindeloze stad: Troje en Trojaanse oorsprongsmythen in de (laat)middeleeuwse en vroegmoderne Nederlanden. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:06 Oct 2021 VI. Trojaanse oorsprongssagen in de verdere Nederlanden 1. Inleiding Brabant was niet het eerste en enige vorstendom in de Nederlanden waarin men zich verbond met Troje. Ook in de andere territoria werd de Europese, speciaal de Frankische traditie gevolgd. Al deze sagen moeten niet alleen in het kader van die oudere overlevering maar ook in elkaars licht worden gezien: er was onderlinge navolging en - soms duidelijk, soms subtiel - concurrentie.
    [Show full text]