DOCSLIB.ORG

ALH Online Review, Series XXI 1 Poetics and Practice 'After'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ALH Online Review, Series XXI 1 Poetics and Practice 'After' ALH Online Review, Series XXI 1 Poetics and Practice ‘After’ Objectivism, eds. W. Scott Howard and Broc Rossell (Iowa City: City: University of Iowa Press, 2018), 240 pp. Reviewed by Stephen Fredman, University of Notre Dame How can an earlier literary movement be said to influence later writers? We know that specific precursors exert a powerful call to subsequent writers and that there are many ways to account for literary inheritance—whether it is seen as emanating from the earlier writer or as invoked by the later one. But what about the case of a movement as a literary influence? This may be a matter of ethics as much as aesthetics, for the later writer chooses the earlier movement because of what it stands for—as he or she conceives of it. In this way, a movement may be seen as modeling ethical/aesthetic stances that a later writer wishes to emulate. In broad terms, this is the issue broached by the authors of the essays in Poetics and Practice ‘After’ Objectivism. The question before the critics is not so much did particular poets who have been classified as Objectivists influence later poets, but rather has the movement of Objectivism exerted a decisive pull? Objectivism is a particularly tricky movement to consider because some of its practitioners and some of its later critics have denied that it ever existed. Louis Zukofsky first applied the term to a group of young, mostly unpublished poets whom he gathered for the February 1931 issue of Poetry. None of the assembled poets was consulted about the term, and in fact Zukofsky called them “Objectivists” but refused to delineate an “Objectivism.” Even the manifesto that he printed to introduce the issue, “Sincerity and Objectification: With Special Reference to the Work of Charles Reznikoff,” was a shorter version of an essay on Reznikoff that had been rejected by the Menorah Journal. Although Reznikoff professed great difficulty in understanding Zukofsky’s gnomic essay, should he nonetheless be designated the sole bona fide Objectivist; or, more broadly, does his spare, socially engaged poetry represent the ideal Zukofsky was reaching for? Not exactly. Among the principal poets who have continued to be called Objectivists—Zukofsky, Reznikoff, George Oppen, Carl Rakosi, Lorine Niedecker, and Basil Bunting—stylistic variations are so wide as to make the definition of a movement nearly impossible, prompting Rachel Blau DuPlessis and Peter Quartermain to argue (in their edited volume) for an Objectivist Nexus. And to muddy the waters further, both Pound and Williams (especially) participated directly in promoting an Objectivist movement that they saw at times as containing their own poetry. Yet, no matter how slippery the designation, it refuses to go away. In some ways, this literary-historical conundrum is less worrying and instead attractive to later poets, who may be partial to one or more of the six main poets associated with Objectivism and © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected] 2 ALH Online Review, Series XXI may also find a movement with fuzzy boundaries more welcoming than one more clearly defined. That is, later poets have the possibility of claiming their Objectivism, and this claim has helped authorized the production of a large variety of new work, from the 1950s to the present. As the editors of the present volume put it, “Our work here concerns the relevance of the Objectivist ethos to poetic praxis in our time, and so we must grasp the most essential characteristics of this legacy” (11). Each essay has a dual focus, then, of clarifying “the Objectivist ethos” and of demonstrating its “relevance . to poetic praxis in our time.” In her essay, DuPlessis explores the initial bond between Oppen and Zukofsky and its subsequent dissolution, detailing their disagreements especially with respect to the long-poem and the poetics supporting it. Like many of the contributors, DuPlessis employs the two notoriously ambiguous terms coined by Zukofsky, “sincerity” and “objectification” as engines in her analysis. She proposes Oppen as primarily occupied with sincerity, emphasizing his existential commitment to lived reality, and Zukofsky as objectifying “crucial cultural materials” into the complex structure of a “summa” (28). She locates these differences particularly within long poems: Zukofsky’s obsessively imbricated “A”, in 24 sections, versus the serial form of Oppen’s sequences, “Of Being Numerous” and “Some San Francisco Poems.” To demonstrate how such “Objectivist” antinomies play out in contemporary work, she questions four poets about the influence of Oppen and Zukofsky on their long poems: her own Drafts, Beverly Dahlen’s A Reading, Ron Silliman’s The Alphabet, and Anne Waldman’s Iovis. Each poet locates a model in the structures of “epic” complexity or modular seriality, or sometimes both. Likewise, they find inspiration in the ways Zukofsky and Oppen test authenticity through personal relations among family members and activate political ambitions by close attention to language and to the objects of everyday life in an urban setting. Complementing this essay, Alan Golding offers a masterful reading of DuPlessis’s Drafts (a long-poem in 114 sections) as a “Post-Objectivist Serial Poem,” showing how urgently her obligations to Oppen and Zukofsky drive central features of the poem. A number of the other essays discuss relationships between a particular Objectivist poet and a contemporary poet. Graham Foust examines poems of Oppen’s involving plants or flowers in order to show how Louise Glück’s The Wild Iris “seems to engage with— and often deviates sharply from—Oppen’s work” (40). Foust accounts for the subtle ethics of Glück’s relationships to flowers and to other people by tying her poems directly to the opening sentence of Oppen’s “Of Being Numerous”: “There are things / We live among ‘and to see them / Is to know ourselves’” (42-43). Jenny Penberthy discusses the ways that Lisa Robertson’s poetry and her reading of Niedecker establish a fascinating dialogue that illuminates the ambitions of both women poets. Amy De’Ath © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected] ALH Online Review, Series XXI 3 gives a reading of Claudia Rankine’s Citizen as activist political poetry, contrasting it especially with Oppen’s work. She resists seeing Objectivists as predecessors of new black poetry because a work like Citizen takes sides in a racial struggle that Objectivist poets did not consider head-on. No matter how provocative chapters that pair an Objectivist with a later poet may be, they sidestep to some extent the central question I see this book as addressing: How does considering a movement as an influence on later poetry simultaneously affect our reading of that movement and of subsequent work? Again, this seems to be a question of ethics as much as aesthetics. Four essays consider more directly how social and political stances of Objectivism open up territory for later poets. Jeff Derksen argues for an “Affective Poetics of Social Sincerity,” especially in the work of Oppen and Reznikoff. Rather than pointing to specific poets influenced by these Objectivists, he demonstrates the continued relevance of Oppen and Reznikoff to contemporary social conditions and to theory addressed at amelioration. Robert Sheppard likewise marshals the examples of Oppen and Reznikoff (and to some extent Bunting) to account for the complex documentary poetry of John Seed’s English “Mayhew Project.” Julie Carr explores a less-considered feature of Objectivist practice—its “homemade quality” (something Hugh Kenner, however, had noted in A Homemade World in 1975)—using the example of two homemade books by Lorine Niedecker created as gifts for Zukofsky and Cid Corman. As antidotes to alienated labor, these books were greatly satisfying to their maker and their recipients. This practice resonates, Carr notes, with the contemporary movement of craftism, in which “needlepoint, knitting, book making, sewing” stand as practices opposed to commodification, to the constant acceleration of work, and to patriarchal assumptions of value in the art world (134). Like Niedecker, each of the three poet/artists discussed by Carr— Linda Norton, Jill Magi, and Maria Damon—have crafted a “handmade poem/object . in direct response to war—specifically to the wars on terror” (142). The impact of the Objectivist example for confronting the most gruesome and challenging aspects of war, specifically in Holocaust representation, is treated by Steve McCaffery. Here the severe means that Reznikoff adopted in his documentary long- poems, Testimony (1934, 1978-1979) and Holocaust (1975), which McCaffery calls “appropriation and retranscription” (149), are models for many poets wishing to engage with what Zukofsky calls “historic and contemporary particulars” without imposing an authorial point of view. McCaffery claims that Holocaust, Heimrad Bäcker’s transcript (1986), and Robert Fitterman’s Holocaust Museum (2011) modify poetry by situating it “within the limits of history and ethics . ; they speak not directly but rather through extracted material evidence and facts that are reorganized in a different discursive context from that of their sources” (150). This austere discipline, first practiced by © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected] 4 ALH Online Review, Series XXI Reznikoff in his lineation of courtroom testimony, is an act of poetic self-abnegation, which McCaffery designates as “Objectivist sincerity as it must be ‘after Auschwitz’” (166). © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nick Selby I in Talking About Transatlantic Influences In
    TNEGOTIATIONSRANSATLANTIC INFLUENCE 1, MARCH 2011 69 TRANSATLANTIC INFLUENCE: SOME PATTERNS IN CONTEMPORARY POETRY Nick Selby I In talking about transatlantic influences in contemporary American poetry, this essay finds itself exploring a double-edged condition. As part of such a double-edged condition, the idea of influence is about power-relations (between texts, between poetics, between nations) and, in the ways that this essay is framing it, the idea of poetic influence across the Atlantic is about senses of possession: possession of, and by, something other. My title promises ‘some patterns in contemporary poetry’. But any patterns that emerge in this essay will be neither as orderly nor as clear-cut as this title might imply. What the essay is seeking to do is to trace some ideas and themes that might develop from a consideration of influence in terms of a transatlantic poetics: the essay’s first half examines the work of two British poets – Ric Caddel and Harriet Tarlo – whose work seems unthinkable without the influence of post-war American poetics upon it; and in its second half the essay thinks through three American poets – Robert Duncan, Michael Palmer and Susan Howe – whose work specifically engages the idea of influence in its debating of issues of the textual, the bodily and the poem’s culpability (and influence) within structures of political power. The idea of influence might be seen to be marked in, I think, three ways in the work of these poets. First, is the idea of direct influence – where one poet acknowledges the influence of another poet upon her / him: an example of which might be Ezra Pound’s petulant acknowledgment of Whitman as a ‘pig-headed father’ (and which is the sort of agonistic view of influence espoused by Harold Bloom in his The Anxiety of Influence);1 or, perhaps, in Michael Palmer’s interest in writing poetry out of his contact with and reading of other poets – Celan, Zanzotto, Dante, Robert Duncan (and many others).
    [Show full text]
  • ENGL 3852 Topics in Poetics W. Scott Howard 'After' Objectivism English
    ENGL 3852 Topics in Poetics W. Scott Howard ‘After’ Objectivism English & Literary Arts Winter Quarter, 2018 [email protected] T & Th 10:00 – 11:50 https://portfolio.du.edu/showard Sie Complex 1110 SH 387-E / 303-871-2887 Description: This course concerns selected works by William Carlos Williams, Lorine Niedecker, George Oppen, William Bronk, Susan Howe, Rachel Blau DuPlessis, Fred Moten, and Lucy Ives, which we will study within and against the so-called Objectivist tradition, following their paths into artistic, cultural, and philosophical / theoretical / political contexts (c. 1931-present). Assignments will include a variety of individual and collaborative works blending creativity, research, and critique. Books: William Bronk. Life Supports: New and Collected Poems . Jersey City: Talisman, 1997. Rachel Blau DuPlessis. Surge: Drafts 96-114 . Cromer, UK: Salt, 2013. [Dana Gioia, ed. Twentieth-Century American Poetics . Boston: McGraw Hill, 2004.] Selected PDFs. Susan Howe. Spontaneous Particulars: The Telepathy of Archives . New York: New Directions, 2014. Lucy Ives. Orange Roses . Boise: Ahsahta Press, 2013. Fred Moten. The Little Edges . Middleton: Wesleyan University Press, 2014. Lorine Niedecker. Collected Works . Berkeley: University of California, 2002. George Oppen. Selected Poems . New York: New Directions, 2003. William Carlos Williams. Paterson . New York: New Directions, 1992. Invitations: Three Écrits @ 40% (5-7 pages each) Two Assemblages @ 20% (2-3 pages each) One Research Project* @ 40% (10-12 pages or the equivalent, depending upon media) * One Project involving research. Open topic, media, form and style. The project should engage in some way with your selection of materials from our studies, and should also address contexts and works beyond that scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Imagination of China in Ezra Pound's and William Carlos
    English Language, Literature & Culture 2021; 6(1): 7-13 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ellc doi: 10.11648/j.ellc.20210601.12 ISSN: 2575-2367 (Print); ISSN: 2575-2413 (Online) Transnational Imagination of China in Ezra Pound’s and William Carlos Williams’ Poetics Tang Wei 1, 2 1School of Foreign Languages, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China 2School of Foreign Languages, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China Email address: To cite this article: Tang Wei. Transnational Imagination of China in Ezra Pound’s and William Carlos Williams’ Poetics. English Language, Literature & Culture. Vol. 6, No. 1, 2021, pp. 7-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ellc.20210601.12 Received : February 9, 2021; Accepted : March 2, 2021; Published : March 10, 2021 Abstract: As a modernist movement in poetry emphasizing the clarity of expression through the use of precise visual images, Imagism drew inspiration from the poetic forms of different countries, among which an influential one was Chinese poetry. As the pioneer of the movement, Ezra Pound is noted for his profound interest in Chinese ideograph and skillful appropriation of Chinese poetry in his own works which inspire and influence a host of American poets of the Modern period including William Carlos Williams. Though Pound and Williams were both labelled as imagist poets, they departed from each other in their later poetics. Researchers have long noticed this departure, but paid scant attention to the influence of Chinese poetry on it. This paper is intended to conduct a study on the influence of Pound’s and Williams’ transnational imagination of China on their poetics which leads to two opposing directions in dealing with Chinese poetry and culture in modern American poetry.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW OBJECTIVISTS NOUVEAUX OBJECTIVISTES NUOVI OGGETTIVISTI Cristina Giorcelli – Luigi Magno
    NEW OBJECTIVISTS NOUVEAUX OBJECTIVISTES NUOVI OGGETTIVISTI edited by sous la direction de a cura di Cristina Giorcelli – Luigi Magno LOFFREDO EDITORE UNIVERSITY PRESS Nuovi oggettivisti_7bozza.indd 2 14/11/13 10:03 Nuovi oggettivisti_7bozza.indd 3 14/11/13 10:03 4 Pubblicato con il contributo del Dipartimento di Studi Euro-Americani e del Dipartimento di Lingue, Letterature e Culture Straniere, Università degli Studi Roma Tre – Via Ostiense, 236 e Via Valco di San Paolo, 19 – 00146 ROMA ISBN 978-8-887564-641-7 Finito di stampare nel mese di ottobre 2013 In copertina: Tony Smith, Marriage (1961) © LOFFREDO EDITORE UNIVERSITY PRESS s.r.l. Via Kerbaker 19 – Napoli 80126 (NA) www.loff redo.it universita@loff redo.it Nuovi oggettivisti_7bozza.indd 4 14/11/13 10:03 4 5 Pubblicato con il contributo del Dipartimento di Studi Euro-Americani Indice e del Dipartimento di Lingue, Letterature e Culture Straniere, Università degli Studi Roma Tre – Via Ostiense, 236 e Via Valco di San Paolo, 19 – 00146 ROMA I Cristina Giorcelli ISBN 978-8-887564-641-7 Introduction 11 Bob Perelman 1 + 1 = 1: Louis Zukofsky and Question of Unity 17 Bob Perelman Finito di stampare nel mese di ottobre 2013 A Guide to Homage to Sextus Propertius 31 The Job 42 Rome 43 Rachel Blau DuPlessis Objectivist Poetics and the Work of Drafts 45 In copertina: Tony Smith, Marriage (1961) Rachel Blau DuPlessis Draft 104: The Book 61 Draft 106: Meant to Say 66 Noura Wedell Transforming Service: Radical Documentary and the Promise of Objectivism 71 © LOFFREDO EDITORE UNIVERSITY PRESS s.r.l.
    [Show full text]
  • Louis Zukofsky: Sources of US Modernism Timothy Morgan Cahill University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2009 Louis Zukofsky: sources of US modernism Timothy Morgan Cahill University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Cahill, Timothy Morgan, Louis Zukofsky: sources of US modernism, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Journalism and Creative Writing, Faculty of Creative Arts, University of Wollongong, 2009. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3424 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact Manager Repository Services: [email protected]. Title Sheet Louis Zukofsky: Sources of US Modernism A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree Doctor of Philosophy from UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG by Timothy Morgan Cahill, Bachelor of Creative Arts (Honours, 1st Class) Faculty of Creative Arts, School of Journalism and Creative Writing 2009 CERTIFICATION I, Timothy Morgan Cahill, declare that this thesis, submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Faculty of Creative Arts, University of Wollongong, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualification at any other academic institution. Timothy Morgan Cahill 25 March 2009 CONTENTS ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................... 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Incidentally Philip Lamantia : a Study of the Poetics of Surrealism
    INCIDENTAWLY PHILIP I&aNTIA: A STUDY OF THE l?cECICS OF SURREALISM Stephen C. ktt B.A., University of Tormto, 1974 THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF in the Departzrrent SlNX FRASER UN-ITY October 1976 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be repruduced in whole or in part, by photoropy or other mans, without pedssim of the author. Nm: Stephen C. Bett Degree: Master of Arts (English) Title of Thesis: Incidentally Philip mtia: . A Study of the Poetics of Surrealism. Ekamining Camnittee: Chairrperson: Michael Steig Robin Blaser Senior Supervisor Peter Quartermain =tern& Examiner Associate Professor University of British ColWia I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis or dissertation (the title of which is shown below) to usere of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for-such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its 'own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission, Title of Thesis/~issertation: TNCTllFNTAI I Y PHTl TP I AWTA. , Author : / (signature ) Stephen Bett (name ) (date) iii ABSTRACT This thesis attempts to locate and unravel the poetics of Surrealism. The chief cmcern is for the "image," the dynamic center of the poetry, and mst especially for its dialectical and aesthetic properties.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Objectivists”: a Website Dedicated to the “Objectivist” Poets by Steel Wagstaff a Dissertation Submitted in Partial
    The “Objectivists”: A Website Dedicated to the “Objectivist” Poets By Steel Wagstaff A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (English) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN‐MADISON 2018 Date of final oral examination: 5/4/2018 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Lynn Keller, Professor, English Tim Yu, Associate Professor, English Mark Vareschi, Assistant Professor, English David Pavelich, Director of Special Collections, UW-Madison Libraries © Copyright by Steel Wagstaff 2018 Original portions of this project licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license. All Louis Zukofsky materials copyright © Musical Observations, Inc. Used by permission. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... vi Abstract ................................................................................................... vii Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 The Lives ................................................................................................ 31 Who were the “Objectivists”? .............................................................................................................................. 31 Core “Objectivists” .............................................................................................................................................. 31 The Formation of the “Objectivist”
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: a Social Reading of Postmodern Poetic Form 1
    Notes Introduction: A Social Reading of Postmodern Poetic Form 1. In The Political Unconscious (1981), Fredric Jameson makes a stark distinction between intellectual and physical work. Nearly three decades later, in a postin- dustrial service economy, this stark distinction is less evident, though Jameson’s caution remains relevant: “One cannot without intellectual dishonesty assimilate the ‘production’ of texts . to the production of goods by factory workers: writ- ing and thinking are not alienated labor in that sense, and it is surely fatuous for intellectuals to seek to glamorize their tasks—which can for the most part be subsumed under the rubric of the elaboration, reproduction, or critique of ideology—by assimilating them to real work on the assembly line and to the experience of the resistance of matter in genuine manual labor” (45). 2. “Over the course of the Cold War, the United States devoted enormous resources to achieving and maintaining an advantage over the Soviet Union in most areas of military technology. Indeed, for the better part of half a century, reliance on qualitative superiority was at the heart of US military strategy, and its pur- suit was the central, defining feature of the entire American defense effort” (Friedberg 207). 3. Pointing to “the anticommunist crusade of the late 1940s and 1950s” as a major cause for the decline of American organized labor, Ellen Shrecker argues that “McCarthyism tamed American labor and brought it into the Cold War politi- cal consensus. Moreover, by preventing the nation’s unions, if so inclined, from building a broad-based social movement that challenged corporate values and championed social justice, McCarthyism narrowed political options for all Americans” (7).
    [Show full text]
  • The Labor of the Avant-Garde: Experimental Form and the Politics of Work in Post-War American Poetry and Fiction
    The Labor of the Avant-Garde: Experimental Form and the Politics of Work in Post-War American Poetry and Fiction Aaron W. Winslow Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 © 2015 Aaron Winslow All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Labor of the Avant-Garde: Experimental Form and the Politics of Work in Post-War American Poetry and Fiction Aaron W. Winslow While literary critics have explored the politics of labor in pre-war modernist literature, the post-45 avant-garde has continued to be framed as a depoliticized repetition of previous avant-garde styles. Examining American avant-garde literature in its relation to the political and economic shifts from the 1960s through the late 1980s, my dissertation corrects this narrative to show that labor and labor politics were central categories in post-war experimental poetry and fiction. I argue that writers as disparate as Charles Olson, William S. Burroughs, Samuel R. Delany, and Susan Howe reworked disjunctive modernist forms to cognitively map emergent economic tendencies in the US. Parataxis, collage, surrealist imagery, aleatory compositional methods, non-linear plotting, and metafictional narrative conceits all constitute the stylistic techniques of an avant-garde engaged in an extended dialogue about work and the politics of work. The canon of experimental literature functioned as a counter-discourse that contested and reshaped discourses of labor by considering it alongside categories of race, gender, and sexuality. By using labor as an entry point into the avant-garde, my dissertation reconsiders the post-war literary canon, revealing an avant-garde that includes writers working across modes and genres.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetics and Praxis 'After' Objectivism by W. Scott
    Poetics and Praxis ‘After’ Objectivism by W. Scott Howard and Broc Rossell, eds. Contemporary North American Poetry Series Alan Golding, Lynn Keller, and Adalaide Morris, series editors Poetics and Praxis ‘After’ Objectivism is an important contribution to our understanding of a movement that refused to be labelled a movement. It will be useful for students of modernist and postmodern poetics interested in the evolution of issues first addressed in Zukofsky’s foundational essays, ‘Program: “Objectivists” 1931’ and ‘Sincerity and Objectification’ and in the various formal innovations launched by the practitioners. This is a new look at Objectivism’s influence and, equally, a look at the problematic nature of ‘influence' in general.”—Michael Davidson, author, On the Outskirts of Form: Practicing Cultural Poetics Poetics and Praxis ‘After’ Objectivism eXamines late twentieth- and early twenty-first- century poetics and praXis within and against the dynamic, disparate legacy of Objectivism and the Objectivists. This is the first volume in the field to investigate the continuing relevance of the Objectivist ethos to poetic praXis in our time. The book argues for a reconfiguration of Objectivism, adding contingency to its historical values of sincerity and objectification, within the conteXt of the movement’s development and disjunctions from 1931 to the present. Essays and conversations from emerging and established poets and scholars engage a network of communities in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. shaped by contemporaneous oppositions, as well as genealogical (albeit discontinuous) historicisms. The book articulates Objectivism as an inclusively local, international, and interdisciplinary ethos, and reclaims Objectivist poetics and praXis as modalities for contemporary writers concerned with radical integrations of aesthetics, lyric subjectivities, contingent disruption, historical materialism, and social activism.
    [Show full text]
  • Niedecker and the Correspondence with Zukofsky, 1931-1970
    Niedecker and the Correspondence with Zukofsky 1931-1970, Jenny Penberthy; Cambridge University Press, 1993. This is a list of books mentioned by Lorine Niedecker in her letters. The review is of Selected Letters of Lorine Niedecker to Louis Zukofsky starting on page 123. Pg. 123; letter #1, dated 1937? Mention of a book on the songs of birds which came with 2 small victrola records. No reference to specific book. Pg. 124; letter #2, dated July 14, 1938 Anton Reiser, Albert Einstein: A Biographical Portrait. Translated anonymously by Louis Zukofsky (New York: Albert & Charles Boni, 1930). Pg. 125; letter # 4, dated May 18, 1941 The Federal Writers Project, Wisconsin: A Guide to the Badger State (New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce, 1941). Pg. 126; letter #4 Angie Kumlien Main, Yellow-Headed Blackbirds at Lake Koshkonong and Vicinity, reprinted from Transactions of Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters(January, 1923). Angie Kumlien Main, Thure Kumlien of Koshkonong, Naturalist. The Descendants of Thure and Christine Kumlien, reprinted from the Wisconsin Magazine of History (March, 1944). Pg. 128; letter # 4 Black Hawk, J.B. Patterson, Editor, The Life of Black Hawk (Boston, 1934). Pg. 129; letter # 4 Louis Zukofsky, ‘History of Design’ see Terrell, Carroll, ed. Louis Zukofsky: Man and Poet (Orono Maine: National Poetry Foundation, 1980). Pg. 130; letter # 5 dated Labor Day, 1944 Mentions the manuscripts of: Lorine Niedecker, New Goose and Louis Zukofsky, Anew. She typed both manuscripts which were both published in 1946 by The James Decker Press, Prairie City, Illinois. Pg. 132; letter # 7 dated April 25, 1945 Saturday Review of Literature (a magazine) read reviews of August Derleth, The Edge of Night (The Press of James Decker, 1945) & review of Ruth Lechlitner, Only the Years (The Press of James Decker, 1944).
    [Show full text]
  • Lorine Niedecker 2016 Collection Hoard Historical Museum Fort
    Lorine Niedecker 2016 Collection Hoard Historical Museum Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin This collection is from Lorine Niedecker’s personal library, brought to the museum shortly after her death by her husband Albert Millen. The materials were borrowed and returned to the museum in 2016. COLLECTION NOTES - Ann Engelman, Friends of Lorine Niedecker, January 2017 I was honored to catalogue the contents of this box. (2x2’ cardboard) I believe these materials to be from Lorine Niedecker’s library, donated to the museum by her husband Albert Millen shortly after Lorine’s death, per Merrilee Lee, Director, Hoard Historical Museum. Loaned out, the materials were returned in 2017. Notes on the Master List, made specifically by me are indicated “ae.” I was careful about assumptions - what was in Lorine’s hand or someone else’s and noted these. Margot Peters and Karl Gartung also assisted. The two Nidecker My Friend Tree chapbooks were clearly mailed to the researcher who returned these materials and the Niedecker T&G book has his name in it. The assumption is that these did not belong to Lorine but were added, gratefully, to the box contents on return. There were also 3x5 cards that have handwriting that is not Lorine’s. There may be other instances and notes were made accordingly. All contents were very dusty. Damaged conditions, minimal, were noted. I was surprised and delighted how many chap books and books were inscribed to Lorine by their authors. Jargon Press was well represented. The number and variety of small press publishers is impressive. There are many chap books and books by Louis Zukofsky, Jonathans Williams, Ian Hamilton Finley and others.
    [Show full text]