Arxiv:1807.11033V2 [Gr-Qc] 14 Nov 2018 Ed Hscnen H Eairo W Ieetcaatrsis- Characteristics Diﬀerent Two of Behavior the Concerns This ﬁeld

Home , Penrose process

arXiv:1807.11033v2 [gr-qc] 14 Nov 2018 ed hscnen h eairo w ieetcaatrsis- characteristics different two of behavior the concerns This field. h quantity the uesre fwrsi hc h S ffc a eeaie.I spite In generalized. was effect BSW the which Ker in extremal works the of for effect) pa series BSW huge test so-called the (the in [1] large in found arbitrarily was This become can quantity first The infinity. etro asfaeo oldn atce n/rteKligenergy Killing the and/or particles colliding of frame mass of center nwrhl pc-ie eecniee n[]weei a hw for shown hig unbounded was time, that it [7]) first where wormhole the [6] Teo For in (the considered wormholes. were includes space-times wormhole this t in called all, is of (this First collision after process). unbounded formally be could proximation) [5]. - [2] redshift r osbea el[] twsrvae htteei eea unde general a is there that revealed was It [8]. well as possible are ∗ lcrncades [email protected] address: Electronic nrcn er,esnilitrs eie ohg nrycollision energy high to revived interest essential years, recent In hssiuae erhfrohrtpso bet uhthat such objects of types other for search stimulates This ASnmes 47.w 04.20.-q 04.70.Bw, numbers: PACS ergoreg rotating. the be of existence the requires This process. Penrose rmteopst ots ftelpefnto ssalenou small is function lapse the E If mouths. opposite the from ecnie olso fprilsi omoena t thr its near wormhole a in particles of collision consider We fdbi tifiiygosubudd ow r ae ihthe with faced are we so unbounded, grows infinity at debris of ue-ers rcs n oaigwormholes rotating and process Super-Penrose nttt fMteaisadMcais aa eea Unive Federal Kazan Mechanics, and Mathematics of Institute E ean ut oetatrcliin erbakhlsbcueo str of because holes black near collisions after modest quite remains vbd qae hro 12,Urieand Ukraine 61022, Kharkov Square, Svoboda 4 8KelosaaS. aa 208 Russia 420008, Kazan St., Kremlyovskaya 18 hro ..KrznNtoa University, National Karazin V.N. Kharkov eateto hsc n Technology, and Physics of Department .B Zaslavskii B. O. E c.m. spsil.I undotta unbounded that out turned It possible. is o,s omoeshould wormhole a so ion, E htee h energy the there, gh a.Prilscome Particles oat. i h etpril ap- particle test the (in ∗ nasrn gravitation strong a in s ercta rvkda provoked that metric r E h energy the ligraosbt for both reasons rlying fdbi esrdat measured debris of ocle super- so-called tceapproximation. rticle funbounded of nrycollisions energy h atclrmodel particular a rsity, esuper-Penrose he E c.m. nthe in E c.m. ong E , 2

unbounded Ec.m. and E for the Teo wormhole. As is shown and extended to more general wormhole metrics in [9], [10], it is connected with extremely rapid rotation. Recently, a work appeared in which a qualitatively new scenario is realized in static

wormholes, so rotation for getting unbounded Ec.m. is not required at all [11]. One particle comes from the left region, the other one comes from the right region, so particles experience

head-on collision. Such a type of collision gives rise to unbounded Ec.m., if the lapse function near the throat is very small. Formally, scenarios with head-on collisions would give

unbounded Ec.m. near black holes as well but the problem there consists in that near the black hole horizon a particle moves towards the horizon, not away from it, so it is diﬃcult to realize the head-on scenario (see Sec. IV A of [5] for details). One way to resolve this

problem and achieve unbounded Ec.m. due to head-on collisions consists in considering white holes [12]. The scenario proposed by Krasnikov, enables one to find qualitatively different way to form an initial state needed for head-on collision. It is worth stressing that enhancement of energy requires the existence of the ergoregion where E can be negative, as usual in the Penrose process [13]. The conservation of energy entails that a particle with large negative energy compensates high positive energy of debris detected at infinity. As the Schwarzshild-like wormhole considered in [11] does not posses the ergoregion, the class of wormholes considered by Krasnikov is not suitable for our purposes. To achieve our goal of making the super-Penrose process possible, we combine the Kras- nikov’s type of scenario with the presence ergoregion. It can exist if rotation of a wormhole is rapid enough. Now, we arrange head-on collision simply due to the wormhole character of geometry only. In other realizations of the super-Penrose process (without wormholes) it was assumed that there is a potential barrier from which a particle can bounce back [14], [15], [16]. Let us consider the metric

dr2 ds2 = N 2dt2 + g (dφ ωdt)2 + + g dθ2. (1) − φ − A θ

We assume that the metric coefficient responsible for rotation ω > 0 like in the Kerr metric. π We will consider all the processes in the plane θ = 2 (which is supposed to be a plane of symmetry), so our metric effectively reduces to the 2+1 dimensional one. We also assume that the metric coefficients do not depend on t and φ, so the energy E = mu and angular − t µ dxµ momentum L = muφ are conserved, u = dτ being the four-velocity, τ the proper time. 3

We suppose that r r< , where r is the throat radius. In terms of the so-called shape 0 ≤ ∞ 0 function b(r) the quantity A =1 b . We make additional assumptions that N has a nonzero − r minimum at r = r and, moreover, N = N(r ) 1. 0 0 0 ≪ The geodesic equations read dt X m = , (2) dτ N 2 dφ L ωX m = + 2 , (3) dτ gφ N N dr = σZ, (4) √A dτ σ = 1 depending on direction of motion, ±

X = E ωL, (5) − L2 Z = X2 N 2(m2 + ). (6) s − gφ dt It follows from the forward-in-time condition dτ > 0 that

X > 0. (7)

Let particles 1 and 2 come from the right and left inﬁnities, respectively, and collide near the wormhole throat. Then, for the energy in the centre of mass frame we have

E2 = (m u + m u )(m uµ + m uµ)= m2 + m2 +2m m γ, (8) c.m − 1 1µ 2 2µ 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 where γ = u uµ is the Lorentz gamma factor of relative motion. − 1µ 2 The conservation laws read

µ µ µ µ m1u1 + m2u2 = m3u3 + m4u4 . (9)

The t and φ components give us

E1 + E2 = E3 + E4, (10)

L1 + L2 = L3 + L4. (11)

Meanwhile, the r component leads to

σ1Z1 + σ2Z2 = σ3Z3 + σZ4. (12) 4

We assume that particle 3 escapes to the right inﬁnity and particle 4 so does to the left inﬁnity. Thus σ = 1, σ = +1, σ = +1, σ = 1 .Then, the conservation of the radial 1 − 2 3 4 − momentum (12) gives us

Z Z = Z Z . (13) 2 − 1 3 − 4 It follows from (10) and (11) that

X1 + X2 = X3 + X4. (14)

Let collision happen just in the region near the throat where N 1. We suppose that ≪ X(r ) = 0 and is not small for all particles. It means that characteristics of all particles are 0 6 not ﬁne-tuned. This makes the problem of escaping much more easy than in the black hole case (see, e.g. [3]). Then,

1 L2 Z X N 2z, z = (m2 + ). (15) ≈ − 2X gφ In this region, (13) can be written as

X X X X + bN 2, (16) 2 − 1 ≈ 3 − 4

b = z z + z z . (17) 4 − 3 2 − 1 It follows from (14, (16) that near the throat (denoted by subscript ”th”)

bN 2 (X ) (X ) 0 , (18) 3 th ≈ 2 th − 2 bN 2 (X ) (X ) + 0 . (19) 4 th ≈ 1 th 2

The quantities X1,X2 are given by the initial conditions. Then, in the region under

discussion, one finds X3, X4 from (18), (19). For a given value (X3)th, there is an infinite set of pairs (E3, L3). They should obey (11), (14). Fixing, say, L4 one finds L3 and

E3 =(X3)th + ωthL3. (20)

Taking L3 large, positive and unbounded, one obtains E3 large, positive and unbounded. This implies that, according to (10), for ﬁxed ﬁnite E , E , L , L the energy E , 1 2 1 2 4 → −∞ 5

L formally. As, by assumption, there exists the ergoregion, negative energies are 4 → −∞ admissible. Thus we obtain simultaneously not only the analogue of the BSW effect but also the super-Penrose process without requiring fine-tuning typical of the BSW effect near black holes [1]. This means that rotating wormholes can be considered as legitimate candidates for such high-energy processes. This is not the end of story. To achieve our goal, it is necessary that particle 3 escape to infinity without reflection from the potential barrier back to the vicinity of the throat, so that the expression inside the radical in (6) should be positive everywhere. Then, the condition under discussion reads Z2 > 0, where Z is given by (6). To simplify formulas, let

us assume that m3 = 0 or negligible. We have from (6) that L X > N , (21) √gφ where it is supposed that L> 0. Eq. (21) is to be satisﬁed in an arbitrary point, not only on the throat. Now, we apply (21) to particle 3 that gives us

NL3 X3 > . (22) √gφ Using (5), we can relate them to their values on the throat:

X =(X ) +(ω ω)L , (23) 3 3 th th − 3 whence (X ) +(ω Ω )L > 0, (24) 3 th th − + 3 N where by deﬁnition Ω+ = ω + . This quantity has simple meaning. For a particle on the √gφ orbit r = const the requirement for the interval to be time-like ds2 < 0, entails

Ω < Ω < Ω+, (25) − where in a similar way Ω = ω N , Ω = dφ . In particular, the ergoregion appears when − − √gφ dt Ω > 0, so rotation becomes inevitable. − Discarding terms of the order N 2 and higher, we have from (18) that (X ) (X ) . 0 3 th ≈ 2 th Eventually, we obtain the condition

(X ) + L (ω Ω ) > 0. (26) 2 th 3 th − + 6

As (X2)th > 0 and, by assumption, L3 > 0, it is suﬃcient to require

ω Ω > 0 (27) th − +

for (26) to be valid. It is worth stressing that in (27) the quantity Ω+ is taken in the

point r, meanwhile ωth = ω(r0). Inequality (27) can be compatible with (25). There is no contradiction here with (25), where all quantities are taken in the point r of collision. In other words, the suﬃcient condition of the validity of (26) reads

ω < Ω+ <ωth. (28)

For a black hole, in the horizon limit N 0 and all three velocities ω and Ω tend to the → ± same limit. By contrast, for a wormhole case the lapse function remains small but nonzero.

Let in the vicinity of r0, 2 2 2 (r r0) N N0 + −2 , (29) ≈ r1 where r1 is some constant. Then, using the Taylor expansion in the immediate vicinity of the throat, we have N0 Ω+(r) ωth + ω′(r0)(r r0)+ . (30) ≈ − gφ(r0) Usually, ω′ < 0 (in particular, this is valid for the Kerr andp Kerr-Newman metrics). Then, N0 we see that for a wormhole under discussion there is a small region r r0 r∗ = ′ , ω (r0) g (r0) − ≤ | |√ φ N0, in which 0 < Ω+(r) ωth . There, condition (27) can be violated. Also, eqs. (28) − ≤ √gφ(r0) ceases to be self-consistent there. Then, in eq. (26) the second term is negative. However, the inequality can be still valid, provided L3 is somewhat bounded. In the worst case, for r r , it follows from (26) that → 0

(X2)th gφ(r0) L3 < (L3)max = . (31) Np0 For a given N , this gives some upper bound. However, sending N 0 we obtain that 0 0 → (L3)max grows without bound. According to (20), E3 also becomes unbounded. Thus, near 2 the throat (where collision occurs), large L3 is compensated by small N, so Z > 0. Far

from the throat, X3(r) is large due to the term E3 and overcomes the contribution from L3 in (6), so Z2 > 0 again.

For small but nonzero N0, the existence of the bound on E3 follows also from the Wald inequalities [17]. If, say, two massless particles appear as a result of collision, we have for such a collisional Penrose process (see, e.g. eq. (4) of [16]) 7

2E E + E2 + g E2 , (32) 3 ≤ 00 c.m 2 p E = E1 + E2. For very large Ec.m, the maximum possible energy at inﬁnity

√g00 (E ) E (33) 3 max ≈ 2 c.m.

Here, g00 > 0 since collision is supposed to occur in the ergoregion.

The quantities γ and Ec.m. (8) can be found directly from equations of motion (2) - (4). Then, for head-on collision (σ = 1, σ = +1) we obtain the formula (listed in many 1 − 2 papers on the BSW eﬀect)

X1X2 + Z1Z2 L1L2 2m1m2γ = 2 . (34) N − gφ When N 0, 0 → 2 2(X1X2)th Ec.m. 2 . (35) ≈ N0 Taking E = E = m , we have E m/N . Thus (E ) m/N as well. 1 2 c.m. ∼ 0 3 max ∼ 0 One more reservation is in order. The combination of small N and a wormhole nature of the metric (because of which the horizon is absent) leads to the undesirable behavior of the Kretschmann invariant in the limit N 0. This gives a low bound on admissible value of 0 → 5 N0. Corresponding estimates were made in [18] for wormholes having the same mass (10 cm in geometric units) as astrophysical black holes. Then, the condition that tidal forces do 13 not destroy atomic matter gives N0 > 10− . This is a very weak restriction. For rotating wormholes formulas from [18] are not applicable directly but they can be used at least for rough estimates. Thus we showed that there is a way to achieve the super-Penrose process without ﬁne- tuning or specially invented scenario. Rotating wormholes realize this in a quite natural way. It is worth stressing that the results are model-independent and are insensitive to the details of the metric. The key point consists in that due to a wormhole character of the

metric, head-on collision is possible in the region of small N0.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the subsidy allocated to Kazan Federal University for the state assignment in the sphere of scientiﬁc activities. I also thank for support SFFR, Ukraine, 8

Project No. 32367.

[1] M. Ba˜nados, J. Silk and S.M. West, Kerr black holes as particle accelerators to arbitrarily high energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, (2009) 111102 [arXiv:0909.0169]. [2] M. Bejger, T. Piran, M. Abramowicz, and F. H˚akanson, Collisional Penrose process near the horizon of extreme Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 121101 [arXiv:1205.4350]. [3] T. Harada, H. Nemoto and U. Miyamoto, Upper limits of particle emission from high-energy collision and reaction near a maximally rotating Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 024027 [Erratum Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 069902] [arXiv:1205.7088]. [4] O. Zaslavskii, On energetics of particle collisions near black holes: BSW eﬀect versus Penrose process, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 084030 [arXiv:1205.4410]. [5] O. B. Zaslavskii, Is the super-Penrose process possible near black holes? Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), 024056 [arXiv:1511.07501]. [6] Tsukamoto, N., Bambi, C.: High energy collision of two particles in wormhole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 91, 084013 (2015). [arXiv:1411.5778]. [7] E. Teo, Rotating traversable wormholes, Phys. Rev. D 58, 024014 (1998) [arXiv:gr-qc/9803098]. [8] Tsukamoto, N., Bambi, C. Collisional Penrose Process in Rotating Wormhole Spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 91, 104040 (2015). [arXiv:1503.06386]. [9] O. B. Zaslavskii, Rotation as an origin of high energy particle collisions, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, Vol. 31, No. 4 (2016) 1650029 [1506.02638]. [10] O. B. Zaslavskii, Rapidly rotating spacetimes and collisional super-Penrose process, Gen. Relat. and Gravitation 48 (2016) 67 [arXiv:1511.00844]. [11] S. Krasnikov, Schwarzschild-Like Wormholes as Accelerators, [arXiv:1807.00890]. [12] A. Grib and Yu. V. Pavlov, “Are black holes totally black?” Grav. Cosmol. 21, 13 (2015); arXiv:1410.5736. [13] R. Penrose, Gravitational Collapse: The Role of General Relativity, Rivista del Nuovo Ci- mento, Numero Speziale I, 257 (1969). [14] O. B. Zaslavskii, Ultrahigh energy head-on collisions without horizons or naked singularities: General approach. Phys. Rev. D 88, 044030 (2013) [arXiv:1305.6136]. 9

[15] Patil, M., Harada, T., Nakao, K., Joshi, P.S., Kimura, M.: Inﬁnite eﬃciency of collisional Penrose process: can over-spinning Kerr geometry be the source of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays and neutrinos? Phys. Rev. D 93, 104015 (2016) [arXiv:1510.08205]. [16] I. V. Tanatarov and O. B. Zaslavskii, Collisional super-Penrose process and Wald inequalities, Gen Relativ Gravit 49, 119 (2017) [arXiv:1611.05912]. [17] R. Wald, Energy limits on the Pentose process, Astrophysical Journal, 191, 231 (1974). [18] S. V. Sushkov and O. B. Zaslavskii, Horizon closeness bounds for static black hole mimickers. Phys. Rev. D 79, 067502 (2009).